Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

Obama.



barack obama

In front of Lincoln. Holding a puppy. Your argument is invalid.

(Barack Obama)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: FTW via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

And this new constitution shall only be followed by the first 42 presidents.  After that they get to do whatever they wantIt's okay to believe in evolution...as long as you don't mind going to Hell.THE MYSTERY MACHINE NEVER LOOKED THE SAME AFTER SHAGGY FOUND JESUS.REAL men are proud of their wives

» 363 comments

  1. Grantski says:

    oh, the irony.

  2. Smurf says:

    Stay tuned aus, you are about to get it.

  3. keithybabes says:

    That’s a kind of Mona Lisa expression on his face there. Got to admit it worries me a bit.

  4. steve says:

    the irony is that lincoln was key in setting the slaves free

  5. squ3lch says:

    Actually, this pretty much validates MY argument…

  6. nazzikene says:

    BTW… if I’m not mistaking, Obama is photoshoped into the pic…

  7. gniknihtkrawkcab says:

    I don’t get it. It just looks like Obama brought his lunch to the Lincoln Memorial. (He eats puppies you know…)

  8. I Like Peanut Butter says:

    Who votes for this knock off piece of $hit!!!! I voted it down like the three times I saw it in voting, and each time it had a socre of like -10. WTF? Knock-off from the hysterical Shaq is holding a panda one…. CAN’T people be original.

    • Rax says:

      I’d say filtering but apparently there is no evidence of this ;) . I don’t want to be called a troll again.

      Now the voting process is firmly set in stone and well documents so the -10 “rating” must have been related to something like the tempurature in North Dakota at the time.

    • I Like Jelly says:

      How is it that you’re voting on the same lol three times?

      Voting here is so eff-ed up. Somebody just goes through and votes “no” on everything, and they do it multiple times. Is it you?

      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

        I hit the button for whatever pic is in front of me. If I see the photo more than once blame PK.

        • PortlandMark says:

          Speaking from personal experience, sometimes you click “submit” and nothing happens… you wait, click it again, wait… click one more time, and FINALLY the screen changes. Now, PK has three copies of my lol, and voters are frustrated as hell.

      • mabsba says:

        I even asked if they could moderate the front pages so that the same people don’t always get them, but they said it was all automatic. :(

    • Default User says:
      I thought it was funny....I'm sorry.  I'll go now
  9. fantasticfake says:

    It’s been photoshopped. A wretched attempt by a novice with limited experience. Two pics combined.
    Tell-tale fuzzy halo along Obama’s shoulder reveals a poor attempt to blend his body with the image that has Lincoln statue. Also because there’s a strong light source on Obama’s face coming from the right, and Lincoln’s face is lit from the left.

  10. nick says:

    I could comment here, but the awesomeness of this picture makes it invalid and irrelevant.

  11. Poncho says:

    Unless your argument is he has tripled the national debt in 1 year, lied about virtually every campaign promise, and is only 1/2 black, then your argument would still be valid. Therefore the validity of this picture is nullified….much like his tenure in office should be.

    • PotlandMark says:

      “tripled the national debt in 1 year”

      The national debt was around ten trillion dollars when he took office. I’m not sure where it is exactly, today, but I believe congress just undertook to allow borrowing up to around twelve trillion dollars. For those of you who are math challenged, twelve is not three times ten. Don’t worry though, your vote still counts as much as mine does.

      Campaign promises: Actually, there are a few he’s broken that p!ss me off greatly, but I don’t think one could argue for “virtually every” promise broken. I’d be interested to see an accounting, though.

      • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

        The St. Pete Times runs PolitiFact, which keeps tabs on Obama’s campaign promises. They’re actually fairly generous, with most promises, including the infamous Guantanamo one, listed as “in the works”.

        I’m confident you’re going to jump down my throat because it doesn’t validate some piece of spin you blindly parrot — so just give me a minute to get my popcorn…

        • PortlandMark says:

          Thanks for the link. I’ll follow it up later.

          • PortlandMark says:

            After examining the link:

            1 promise broken.
            1 promise kept.
            7 promises “In the Works”.
            6 promises “Stalled”

            Certainly not a ringing endorsement of Obama’s political agility and skill, but at least it can’t be said that he’s broken “Virtually All” of his campaign promises.

            • Jonathan says:

              Don’t know when you checked but now it reads
              91 promises kept
              33 compromised
              15 broken
              87 Stalled
              275 in the works

              For one quarter of one term that doesn’t seem too bad. Especially as many of them (Guantanamo for example) were blocked by congress and the senate rather than him actually changing his mind.

        • Wino says:

          I have been checking this site regularly since they started tracking his promises. Many of the ratings are nonsensical b\c they feel the need to rate everything in their listed categories without very much information.

          I do think that this website brings into question much of the common criticisms of Obama, particularly related to his ‘inactivity’ or promise breaking. Besides rating some things too early, my problem with the St. Pete times is that they seem to treat every ‘promise’ equally and their list of the top 25 promises doesn’t provide a reasoning for why they are the top 25.

        • Nebton says:

          I think it’s actually a pretty good list, FWIW. The promise that’s still “in the works” that strikes me as taking way longer than it should is repealing DADT. That’s purely an executive decision, so Congress has no ability to stall him on it. Obama has disappointed me a little more than I expected in getting things done, but if he hadn’t, he’d be upsetting a lot more people on the right (not that I think that’d be a bad thing).

          • PortlandMark says:

            Not true about DADT. NPR was discussing it yesterday; congress passed it into law in 1993, so it’s going to need a new law to repeal it.

      • Default User says:

        Last night on the Daily Show Jon Stewart said that Obama’s mistake was in treating Congress as an equal branch of the government. I would have to disagree. Obama’s mistake was treating congress like a group of rational reasonable adults. I think we should be able to put politicians in time out for not playing well with others.

      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

        How can Obama blame the Republicans when he has a Super Majority (well HAD a super majority) in both the Sentate and House. He should have had no problem pushing his agenda if it was “strictly” partisan, as he said everything was. The man can not see the forest through the trees, is a lack luster leader, and needs to understand the country he lives in. He’s not in Europe, and he needs to realize that.

        • FaileV says:

          I personally think he was being idealistic. Believing congress represented the people, so the best choice would be to get congress to agree, not just push what he wanted. In which case…that was rather stupid.

          • Jane St.Clair Glamorous First Lady of PK says:

            Clearly Obama expects the best out of people and thinks that if we all talk about it we can have a reasonable discussion and come to a solution. What he’s forgetting is that the “people” in congress are not human beings by any stretch of the imagination.

            • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

              If that’s true, why do his discussions end up looking like dictums? He’s barely engaged Congress, spent his first year skewering his critics, and is somehow surprised they they haven’t followed orders.

              • Jane St.Clair is Having a Tea Party says:

                I doubt we’ll ever see eye to eye on Obama, Dhoti. ;)

                Mainly I was attempting (and failing) to sarcastically paint the entirety of congress as soulless robots from some Terminator knock-off.

        • mabsba says:

          LOL. If you think Obama had a super majority, you’re counting pseudo-dems like Lieberman, yes? And the DINOs that vote against everything Obama wants passed?

          • Nebton says:

            Well, to be fair, technically, if you count the two non-Democrats who caucus with the Democrats (Frank and Lieberman), we did briefly have a super-majority between the time that Franken was sworn in and Kennedy died. (By the way, is it just me, or has no in the media seemed to notice that the Dems did not lose the super-majority in this most recent election, but rather failed to regain it? Once Kennedy died, the super majority was gone.)

            The difference is that the Republicans are marching in lock-step and the Democrats are not. Whether you think that’s good or bad is up to you.

            • mabsba says:

              Well, I really think a couple of those so-called dems are barely so, but I concede your point. I think Obama should have just shoved everything through by reconciliation when he first got in office as Bush did. Now he’s lost a lot of the momentum.

              • Nebton says:

                Of course, the real contradiction is that while berating the Democrats for not being able to get bills passed while having a super-majority, the Republicans were also howling about how partisan the Democrats were being. If they had been as partisan as the Republicans, those bills would’ve gotten passed.

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  Repubs were yelling and screaming about how partisan Obama was being, and how the leadership was being. Pelosi saying something along the lines of “We’ll do it our way without the Republicans help”. The problem was that all the Blue Dog Dems knew that the public didn’t want the plan as presented and in order to get their votes the Dems sold their soles and changed the bill to the point now that the Bill is a Frankenstein where NO ONE is happy about it, YET the President and Pelosi are still shoving it down people’s throats.

                  And the Dems had a Super Majority even after Teddy died, b/c the Governor of Mass appointed a stand-in until the election, so yes there was a Super Majority until last week, it’s just that there were some Dems that realized their constituents DID NOT WANT this bill.

                  The Bills didn’t get passed b/c they weren’t bi-partisan, they were whatever the President and Dem leadership wanted, and disregarded what the republicans wanted or proposed. WHY would you vote yes for something that you had no say in and disagreed with? Sounds kind of stupid to me.

    • Rax says:

      I think you mean the yearly deficit.

      I would ask if you also have considered home much additional money has been printed….last time I saw a report is was approximately an additional 123.5%. This would mean you would need to add over a trillion dollars to your deficit number.

      • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

        The national debt is distinct from the money supply, but otherwise your point is correct.

        Remember, kids — when emphasizing fiscally irresponsible Republicans, reference the national deficit; when covering for fiscally irresponsible Democrats, reference the national debt. Easy!

        • wicket says:

          I saw a nice piece on the history of the last 5 Presidents and their deficits before and after holding the office. Every Republican: Reagan, Bush 1, and Bush 2 spent more than their Democratic counterparts Carter and Clinton. Pretty interesting stuff, considering the right claims to be the fiscally responsible of the two.

          • Nebton says:

            Hopefully, Obama won’t break the trend, but so far… (And yes, I realize he was dealt a difficult hand.)

            • Rax says:

              I will certainly grant a bad hand, but in the end he asked to play.

              For myself, I am unhappy with his lack of results even after I take into consideration what he started with.

          • Dhoti is wanted by the Cheezburger Police says:

            My beef with that comparison is that it doesn’t correct for the business cycle, which has a major impact on federal revenue. If you do, things like the Bush deficits (41 and most of 43) and the Clinton surplus basically flatten out.

            In fact, if you take that at face value, it also says something about different voter behavior in booms versus busts.

          • I Like Peanut Butter says:

            wicket; That’s b/c Carter and Clinton taxed the $hit out of people which helped to tank the economy’s at the end of their Presidencies. What people don’t realize is that the Internet Bust happened in Clinton’s last year.

            • Agent Maxwell Silverhammer says:

              Well if we’re running that course then.. can the right finally admit Bush F-ed up the economy?

              • Justacarolinian says:

                Bush and the economy plus no child left behind are the reasons I got real hard into looking into the libertarian party, and decided that I didn’t like none of them.

                • Maxwell Silverhammer in his TARDIS says:

                  I refuse to comment on No Child Left Behind for the sake of my blood pressure.

                  • mabsba says:

                    But it’s great if you want to see a public school teacher’s head explode!*

                    *not that I would encourage that as some of my best friends are teachers. ;)

                  • Well, you gotta stop those damn union teachers from turning our kids into damn commies somehow.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      Naw only the REAL life can stop that… :-) That’s why the moajority of people get more conservative the older they get… (my wife was a Clintonite when I met her 8 years ago, she’s slowly transitioning to the Middle… SHE ALMOST voted for McCain, until he started to pan handle to the Christian Right.

              • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                Max: I don’t know is Bush helped FVck the economy, however his spending was out of control, hence why Bush is NOT a conservative. Why do you think his approval rating was in the low 30′s, b/c Conservatives didn’t like what he was doing also.

          • Rax says:

            In this case, thats like saying less dead.

            And I think Obama may reverse that trend.

      • mabsba says:

        There are many games played with the annual deficit. You can find many sources online that compare how Obama’s admin measured it in 2009 versus Bush’s admin’s methods (the most obvious difference being that Obama included the costs of the Iraq & Afghan wars and Bush didn’t).

        E.g., {http://www.capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/stan-collender/789/bush-gimmicks-2009-obama-deficit-would-have-been}

        • Rax says:

          That was a good web site and matches the information that I have seen about the Obama-debt.

          The numbers that I was able to find places the Bush-debt (second term) including the war at around 3 trillion (give or take). Although I would have to include the loss of the Clinton-Surplus against his term.

          But when you account for the Obama-printing of 1.2 trillion additional, this would raise his first year debt to about 2.5 trillion (in 1 year alone) accounting for the items you specified but not including any residual commitments for things like TARP.

          I would have to say that in both cases, I would have to agree that this is too much.

          • PortlandMark says:

            To be fair, the Fed is not under Obama’s direct control, so the printing of excess money can’t be blamed on him. Otherwise, carry on.

            • Rax says:

              and would Bernanke have been reappointed let alone confirmed without Obama?

              I think its clear which direction is uphill in Washington.

              Just because a the dotted line isn’t straight (the blackhole we call the deficit bends space and time) doesn’t mean its still can connect the dots.

    • Danbala says:

      “and is only 1/2 black”

      Very klutzy of him. :p

  12. phil says:

    There is no way that is photoshopped at all. I don’t believe. I mean words do magically appear in pictures, just like money magically appears in Obama’s budget! The irony can also be found in the fact that Lincoln was the first REPUBLICAN president, and also emancipated the slaves, however, a BLACK lying DEMOCRAT is standing in front of his statue.

  13. deadinfrance says:

    the dog looks constipated…..

  14. ts.atomic says:

    The picture and caption make no sense. Then again, most everything this President has done flies in the face of logic and reason (ie, spending our way out of debt; war criminals in civilian court; aversion to calling islamo-terrorists “terrorists”; Blaming Bush for Obama’s inheriting economic problems caused by legislation that Obama himself supported, argued for and voted for; etc. etc. etc)

  15. Rax says:

    Nice to see how the commentary tone on the Obama pictures have change in the past 9 months.

  16. sad smiles says:

    i’m not the brightest bulb in the tree, but: is this a photoshop or did the White House actually stage this photo?

    • Justacarolinian says:

      You didn’t hear about the panic that savage beast caused? Poodles at the Lincoln Memorial, oh the horrors!

      • Wino says:

        There was BLOOD everywhere!

        • mabsba says:

          It’s really the white rabbit in disguise.

          • Wino says:

            “He’s got huge, sharp– he can leap about– look at the bones! “

            • mabsba says:

              “What, the rabbit?”

              • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                Mabs, my son came to me a while ago and said, “Mom, I saw this awesome movie. Do you know who Monty Python is?”
                I was so proud, I nearly cried (his dad didn’t “get” Python).

                • mabsba says:

                  Aw. That’s one of the best parts of parenting. My husband bought me the entire Monty Python show on DVD for xmas. My son finished watching it before I did.

                  Actually, it was very cute. He kept waiting for me to finish each DVD, then finally asked if he could ‘skip ahead.’

                  • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                    My son and I are so alike in personality but vastly different in tastes. I never thought we’d connect over anything but Scooby Doo :lol: The moment is going in his baby book, dammit!

                  • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                    Was this the 17 year old? I find very few teenagers get or like Python. My friends thought I was nuts. :D

                    • Default User says:

                      I was 17 but 7 years ago and I knew plenty of others my age who liked monty python. Admittedly all of my friends were a bit weird.

                      • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                        Not weird, DU, above the norm.

                        • Agent Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                          Most teenagers don’t get political and social satire…

                        • mabsba says:

                          These teenagers were better informed about the last election than most eligible-to-vote adults I know…sadly.

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer in his TARDIS says:

                          I will say that is true, the last generation surprised me a bit. Although their taste in entertainment annoys me (Miley Cyrus. Jersey Shore) I will say that I am overall impressed with their life decisions.
                          And then there are others that make me facepalm, but hey, they’re teenagers ;-)

                        • mabsba says:

                          Whenever they have a dance, they seem to have ‘discovered’ some new band…like the Beatles. A bit like Nucky’s boy ‘finding’ Monty Python.

                          They still do amazingly stupid things at times. ;)

                    • mabsba says:

                      In his group of friends I think they could have entire conversations just quoting Monty Python. (I only have the now 17 year old.)

                      • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                        Apparently, I only knew losers with no taste. I’m not really surprised. :D

                        • mabsba says:

                          Aw. I haz a sad for you. Of course, most of my son’s friends are at the same private school, so automatically you get only pretty smart kids. And obviously really smart people LOVE Monty Python, right?

                        • justacanuck the Official Booty Wench of Asgard says:

                          Well, looking at my ex-husband, I would have to yes, only smart people get and love MP. :D

                        • viking gal says:

                          Monty Python geeks RULE!

                        • Brak the *BANG* THUNDER GOD INCARNATE...actually pretty beat himself. Ah, the climb says:

                          Are you embarrassed easily? I know I am. But that’s all right-it’s all part of growing up and being British.

  17. This would have made a much better Clue reference…

    “I’m ready to make an accusation! Obama, with a puppy, by Honest Abe!”

    It even conjures the image of Obama using a puppy flail to kill some Victorian dressed individual. Much funnier.

  18. Warm Mountain says:

    The deal with the dog is that the dog only has three legs. Kind of a mutt. Obama called himself a bit of a mutt more than once. And Lincoln is his role model, and I think he believes that someday he will be revered at a great president like Lincoln. So, unwisely, Obama posed in front of Lincoln’s statue with this mutt to illustrate how a man like Obama could grow up to the president. I think it’s creepy myself.

  19. Blargh says:

    He looks pained at having to lower his chin from it’s normal position.
    Photographer: Ok, tilt your head down a little bit
    Obama: like this?
    Photographer: little bit more
    Obama: how’s that?
    Photographer: little bit more
    Obama: there?
    Photographer: Holy freakin’ cow man, like 20 more degrees! don’t make me coax it all out of you *grimace*
    Obama: Hurry, I can’t hold it for very long

    • Agent Maxwell Silverhammer says:

      How dare a president have his head held high! This is America it’s the residents who get to hold our heads high cause we’re awesome! We want our presidents short, stocky, with no neck and no self esteem!
      WARGLBLARGLE!

  20. justalurkr says:

    I’m still unclear what about the iconography of a president holding a puppy in front of another president renders any argument invalid, let alone what irony (if any) there may be. Of course, I only skim on my lunch break.

  21. CAIN says:

    he is truly a villain like mr evil

    IN THE NAME OF OF CAIN IN THE NAME OF CAIN!!!

  22. Kuro says:

    looks shopped.

  23. Kraas says:

    Well this is stupid…

  24. Danielle says:

    Awww, a bichon!

  25. Attani says:

    Bush in front of Lincoln would be ironic.

  26. tengrosita says:

    Thank you very much for this post. A good read indeed…

  27. Trelior says:

    Two angry camels in a tiny car. Your argument is invalid

  28. Wendy says:

    Two camels in a tiny car?

    =3 FTW

    • George says:

      lmao thats what i was gonna put when i clicked on on this pic!!!
      cuz nothing beats two camels in a tiny car haha win

  29. Sharon says:

    I… can’t believe I read all these comments.
    All your arguments are invalid.

  30. murdermajig says:

    2 CAMELS AND A TINY CAR!!!!!!

    Makes Obama holding a puppy behind lincoln INVALID

  31. Tanpuk says:

    And yet this is truly all it takes for him to win the hearts of millions. He has a dog. Well, lets see, WHAT DOES A DOG HAVE TO DO WITH POLITICS?!?! hes black. well, lets see, WHAT DOES BEING BLACK HAVE TO DO WITH POLITICS?!?! black or white, dog or no dog, facebook or no facebook, all that matters is the ideas that he has (which suck btw) and yet he has half of the country swooning after him. mccain at least was a lesser evil. Do you want firearms to be illegal? people that are law abiding citizens will just be hurt by this. people who dont care just armed themselves and law abiders will be even more defenseless. do you want healthcare to be government run? think about canada, where it is government run. most canadians come here for healthcare because the government decides if you are worth treating, and that could take an average of 6 weeks. I COULD BE DEAD IN 6 WEEKS! I could be infected or hurt beyond repair with coplications easily avoided by instant care. He promised change, but he has done nothing but change us for the worse! he lowered the value of the dollar by printing more bills, then gave it to companies and people who failed anyway. The only good thing he has done was with the somali pirates, and that is a no-brainer. reconsider obama and vote for the true choice in 2012: CHUCK NORRIS!!! and yes, he is running, no scam


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    shortright; founding… on Watch Out Terrorists…
    Shaks on AFRICA
    Shaks on At Least They Won’t Be…
    murky 2.0 on Watch Out Terrorists…
    Shaks on Watch Out Terrorists…
    Dontmonkeyk on Ministry of Silly Walks: Aztec…
    Dontmonkeyk on Will There Even Be A Next…
    dissimilitude on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    dissimilitude on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    jklinders on Will There Even Be A Next…
  • Hall Of Fame


    Classic Political LOLs!

    Hall of Fame


  • Tag Cloud

  • See Random Political LOLs

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog