'
Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

The police still haven’t



feminist protesters

The police still haven’t found his body.

(Feminist protesters)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: BroadwayJoeFYVM via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

Secret Service intervention required...  ...in ...3 ...2 ...1not now honey,  Mommy is busy    taking away your rights as a womanREASONABLE FIRST AMENDMENT LIMITSEight years summed up in a single picture.

» 608 comments

  1. Sylvia says:

    And they never will, either.

  2. McCain says:

    Bad thing, right?

  3. B says:

    …And they never will.

    • keithybabes says:

      They never will iron his shirt? How the f*** is he going to get it ironed?

      • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist Pastafarian says:

        You have a death wish too, huh?

          • Rattus says:

            They really don’t.

            • ok, we will iron the shirts, they can start painting, doing the auto repair, taking out the trash, doing the heavy lifting, defending the house from dwarven raids…cause mens work is still mens work..but noooooo dont lable something as womens work thats so sexist..

              • viking gal says:

                Most women paint, take out the trash and do heavy lifting. Some women do auto repair–I used to, but didn’t really like having old car oil on my face. I can do some appliance repair also.
                However, you do have me on the dwarven raids, I haven’t fended them off yet–but I have gone into a flooded basement to turn off the electrical power. Does that count?

                  • viking gal says:

                    Nope. All married cousins, aunts, friends. If the house needs painting, it goes faster when 2 people do it. And different couples have different ways to divvy up the chores.
                    I guess I technically qualify as ‘single’, but I’ve been in a relationship for 4 years now. He’s better at tech and laundry than non-tech repairs. And the trash needs to go out, even if the guy is overseas on a trip!

                  • Tut tut, still working on that dryer, love? Here let me have a look at it, this is man’s work. Make us a cup of tea, there’s a good girl. *pokes dryer* *drinks tea* *pokes around in enormous tool box**pokes dryer again*. See here’s your problem right there. It’s fvcked.

                    • viking gal says:

                      *snort*
                      I’ve gotten an extra 3 years out of a washer that my male roomies assumed was ‘dead’ (just needed a new pulley), and 5 extra years out of an ancient dryer. (periodic oiling and whacking with a wrench for that one!)
                      Grad student = broke, and I was one for quite a while!

                      • mabsba says:

                        Yeah, I changed the fuse earlier. (The parts I took out on Saturday that some smart man described as the fuses were NOT, in fact, the fuses.) After I got home I thought maybe the connections were bad, so I cleaned the fuse connections. No go.

                        I wish I had some decent schematics. The ones it came with are just for identifying parts — not actual disassembling. (And hopefully reassembling!) Now I have to decide if I want to remove the thermostat and check that. I really hate my dryer right now. :(

                      • Default User says:

                        I think you should try VG’s method. Hit it with a wrench.

                      • mabsba says:

                        I thought about that, but I figured she probably doesn’t have the wrench any more. :) Right now I’m weighing the cost of getting it fixed versus a new dryer.

                      • paws4thot says:

                        I don’t know how easy it would be to source a copy in the USA, but Haynes Publishing have done some domestic appliance manuals in the UK.

                  • Rattus says:

                    I’m married. I do ALL furniture building and reupholstering, painting, putting up of shelves, hooks and curtain rods (plus I make the curtains myself) and I stripped and painted the front of our house. I also do some of my own bike repair (I admit that my husband does the more technical stuff), including fixing flats on the road. On top of that, I make my own clothes and some of my husband’s foul weather gear. We don’t live in the 50s anymore gentlemen, and it’s time you all started learning how to look after yourself.

                    Oh yeah, my husband knows that he needs to put my tools back where they came from or there will be hell to pay. Or at least some whining to listen to.

                  • BoringTroll says:

                    You can probably order a service manual from repairclinic dot com. They also let you search for replacement parts by size, color, material, etc… its like the game 20 questions, but it helps you fix stuff. It also helps you identify parts correctly.

                    • Default User says:

                      That information is useful and dull! You are a boring troll!

                    • mabsba says:

                      This was actually really helpful. (The dryer still doesn’t work, but I know what all the pieces are called.) :)

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        Food for thought, most modern dryers are sooooo much more energy efficient, they will pay for the cost of buying them in a decent amount of time. Even if you have to finance them.
                        And the larger the house hold, the better that gets. I have the Whirlpool Duet washer and dryer, the front loading style. With 5 kids, this is the only way to keep up with laundry. It washes nearly 3 times the clothes per load, takes less time, water, energy and soap. And the dryer gets the job done in about 45 minutes, instead of 60. And that’s with the larger loads too. Plus it has an automatic sensor, so if it gets done in 35 minutes, it shuts off the heat and sounds the buzzer. And my clothes seem to be cleaner too. I can only guess the front load type of drum works better.
                        But be careful of imitators, as I have seen some front load washers that have drums the same size as a normal washer.

                      • mabsba says:

                        Thank you for the advice. We discussed all this for quite a while this weekend (it died on Friday). The money is not the consideration right now; there are some other issues that just need attention more than spending time choosing a dryer.

                        Regarding the front load washers, I have read a lot about people having problems with mildew and mold (not entirely sure what distinction they were making there). And my husband has not been impressed with the reliability, but that might just be new appliances in general. (He’s the shopping one; I don’t like to shop for anything except books and art stuff. He likes to research and read up on everything.) Hopefully this is not your experience. :)

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        As far as the mold issue, simple. Wipe the door gasket, on both sides. DUH. And most people would shocked to know how much mold is growing in a stand up washer. You just don’t get as easy access to it, IE, out of sight, out of mind.
                        My set is more about 10 years old now, and the only issues have been replacing a sensor in the dryer door, and a pump in the washer. The sensor in the door actually didn’t have to be replaced, but it was under warranty, so the repairman did. Turns out that removing 3 screws, lifting out the lint screen, and blowing off the sensor solves it.
                        I also don’t think the pump would have had to be replaced as soon, were it not my wife trying to teach my mentally retarded 13 year old daughter how to wash clothes. She gets the idea, but was obviously not checking pockets, as when I took it out, it was full of pennies and rocks. (I also have a 9 year old autistic son) The screen caught all the junk, but was slowing down the flow of water to the pump, causing cavitation damage. Take the time to set it up properly. Nice and level, sturdy floor. Ground it well. I actually put a 3/4 inch piece of plywood under mine to protect both the machine and floor. And I love my machines.

                      • Oooooh, that sounds nice, JAC. We have to run our POS dryer at least two times on “towels” load just to get an average load of laundry clean (that isn’t even towels). Alas, I only rent, so it’s not even my dryer.

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        I have a front-loader washer (about 5 years old now) and LOVE it. Never had any mold/mildew problems, and it gets clothes cleaner with less water.

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        Diss, your is just getting the age to start semi yearly cleaning. The big rubber ring that seals the door to the tub needs to be simply wiped on the underside. It’s quite flexible on most models. And I also advise removing the lower front panel, and unscrewing the pump cover, and cleaning that screen. Just for long term prevention. It’s so much easier to do on the upright models.

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Funniest thread I’ve read in ages.

                      • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                        @ Keithy – Agreed. I couldn’t tell if somehow it was a commercial for a new front load washer.

                • TLV says:

                  For ale!

            • You missed the iron-y, love. (clue: the word ‘ladies’)

      • Sylvia says:

        He can lay in the road and wait for a steamroller to come by.

  4. McCain says:

    Thats a bad thing, right?

  5. wasyoungonce says:

    iron your own shirt butt wipe,

  6. The Steve says:

    Oh behalf of SSOSS I think I can safely say that guy’s sign is funny.

    This is like holding up “Cubs Suck” sign at Wrigley. It’s just awesome.

    (ps: I iron my own shirts)

    • It’s the interwebs, so the feminists can’t hurt us! Hahahahaha
      OW FVCK!!!!
      How’d they do that?

      • (BTW, before any feminists give me any crap for laughing at the Steve’s comment, trust me, there ain’t nothing chauvinistic about my marriage. *goes to change the laundry before cooking dinner*)

        • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

          As a feminist I approve of this LOL and TS’s comment. Plus, I think the guy’s sign is funny. Funny in that tragic way because they probably didn’t find his body. He obviously had a death wish or lost a bet.

          • Justacarolinian says:

            What do you say to a feminist with 2 black eyes? Nothing, she’s already been told twice…..
            And it was one of you ladies on here that told me that joke, so be sure to laugh with her……

            • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

              Actually, I remember who told that joke and it wasn’t one of the women on here. It was a jerk who has been banned.

              • Justacarolinian says:

                No, Ma’am. I promise you, it was one of you about 2 weeks ago.

                • viking gal says:

                  The version I heard is ‘what do you say to a woman with 2 black eyes?…time for a new bra’.
                  I like my version better!

                • mabsba says:

                  First, I will believe that when that woman confesses to it. Second, a woman telling a joke about domestic violence is just about as funny as a black person telling a joke about lynching. Not.

                  • Justacarolinian says:

                    Well, I’m actually waiting on that woman to speak up. Which is her prerogative to do. It was on Facebook, and she told me a handful of women’s jokes.
                    And you know what? I laugh about male jokes too. And I have heard a black man make jokes about lynching.

                    • mabsba says:

                      I spent Friday afternoon with a friend who was grieving for her friend who was in an abusive relationship and killed herself last week. So I guess we just have different ideas about what’s tasteless.

                      PS I wouldn’t laugh at jokes about men getting beaten up either.

                      • wicket says:

                        I agree that the joke was bad. It wasn’t even that funny when i heard it 15 years ago. But if it’d been funnier, i’d have no problem laughing at some extreme version of a societal taboo such as, wife beating. It’s got to be funny though, otherwise I’m on your side and I’d rather not here it.

                      • So basically timing killed it for you. I hate when that happens.

                        • mabsba says:

                          No, I’ve always thought that joke sucked. This week it just sucked more. Domestic violence is the leading case of violent death for women in this state, so that makes it just soooooooooo funny. Not.

                          Jokes don’t have to be tasteless. ;)

                        • Eh, I prefer tasteless jokes, personally. That one was always meh for me but never one to get worked up about.

                          Though in my defense, I prefer sex jokes over trite chauvinistic jokes. As for your comment about conditions making the joke not funny, that logic should hold that I abhor any rape jokes but I don’t…

                    • Justacarolinian says:

                      But are you a Barbie girl? In a Barbie world?

                  • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                    mabs – it was me. i wasn’t here to speak up yesterday because i was crazy busy with work… but i told JAC a whole string of “anti-female” jokes that i find funny.

                    i think my favorite is…
                    “how many men does it take to open a bottle of beer?”
                    “none, it should be open when she brings it to him!”

                    • mabsba says:

                      That’s anti-female. The other is tasteless. Sorry. That’s my opinion.

                      • Justacarolinian says:

                        What you are missing is that it’s demonstrating the absurd by being absurd. No one with a right mind would take it serious.
                        And on a personal note, I hope you look into both sides of domestic violence. It’s not just men beating and killing women. The truth would surprise you.

                        • mabsba says:

                          No it would not and neither does your assumption that I am not familiar with the subject.

                          I am not ‘missing’ anything. I have a right to believe that something is tasteless.

                        • Justacarolinian says:

                          Just basing it on your comments. And it is tasteless. It’s demonstrating the absurd by being absurd. With all that education you brag about, I would think you could understand that.

                        • mabsba says:

                          I just said I thought it was tasteless. Which apparently you agree with. I don’t happen to like tasteless and don’t think it’s funny. You know, one can get the point of a joke without liking the joke.

                        • Justacarolinian says:

                          But what you are missing is that you can laugh at the stupidity of others. It’s called mocking! Yes, it can be done!
                          And it’s often a way to influence others to understand the foolishness of certain parts of an argument. This amazing thing called peer pressure!
                          And the shocking part of the whole thing? I think you knew that from the beginning! Yes, you did!

                        • mabsba says:

                          I just find it tasteless and unfunny. Period. I’m sorry that’s so hard to grasp. Who made you the humor king?

                        • Justacarolinian says:

                          Did you forget that you sent in the nomination yourself? Egads, mabs has oldtimers!

                        • Okay, honestly, I hate that joke too. Domestic violence jokes tend to make me wince (saw one on Family Guy last night that I didn’t enjoy at all). There’s no history of domestic violence in my family or anything, so I must just hate certain really tasteless jokes (yet others I find hysterical).

                        • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                          I get the joke. Like mabs, I find it tasteless. I have also heard jokes like this told from people that hold views a little too close to the ‘absurd’ beliefs you are referring to JAC. It makes it less funny when (tasteless or not) when there is evidence that the person telling the joke has a little too much in common with the ridiculous beliefs being prodded.

                          Plus, insisting that a joke is funny does not make others think the joke is funny.

                        • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                          On another note, I was going to write “it is less funny when you have a joke repeatedly shoved down your throat,” but I decided that could have been construed as another domestic violence joke.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Or a joke about someone not too well endowed. :)

                          See, I can even make crude jokes. There are just some subjects I don’t think are amusing ever.

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        Then there’s the “How many women does it take to screw in a light bulb? None: the b**** can cook in the dark!” Tasteless: Yes… Funny: After a few beers.

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        Well when she sees the fire from the food it’s done.

                      • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                        ILPB these are for you…

                        why don’t women wear watches?
                        there’s a clock above the stove.

                        why do women have smaller feet than men?
                        so they can stand closer to the stove.

                        why couldn’t helen keller drive?
                        because she was a woman.

                        aaaaaaand i’ll stop there. the rest of them get A LOT worse.

                      • turns out hellen keller could talk, but since she was a woman no one really listened anyways

                      • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                        why didn’t anyone hear helen keller when she fell off the cliff?
                        she was wearing mittens!

                        (not a female joke… but one that’s equally atrocious and hilarious)
                        why’d the girl/boy fall off the swing?
                        she/he had no arms!

                      • Default User says:

                        -Here’s a bad one for you-
                        Top ten best pick up lines:
                        5. Did it hurt? When you fell out of heaven?
                        4. You’re legs must be tired because you’ve been running through my mind all day
                        3. That [article of clothing] is very becoming on you. If I were on you I’d be cumming too.
                        2.(Use index finger to call someone over then say) I made you come with one finger, imagine what I could do with my whole hand.

                        And number one best pick up line ever: Excuse me, but does this rag smell like chloroform to you?

                • I think it was jim. If not, it was definitely another bloke who was being a tw@t.

              • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                i told waylon that one… i have any number of anti-female jokes that i find far too funny.

            • Rattus says:

              I would like to say that I hate that joke as much as any other joke I’ve ever heard, and I hate it more each time I hear it. Which I guess puts it at number 1 on my sh!t list.

          • The Steve says:

            Yeah, but you’re not one of those crazy “all men are evil and going to extremes to avoid enjoying sex advances our agenda” feminists.

            They make everyone miserable, even themselves.

            • Dina says:

              Hey now, they can enjoy sex. But only if it’s with other women. ;)

              (And before anyone gets shirty, look up lesbian feminism.)

              • viking gal says:

                I’ve run into a few of that sort of feminist only 2 or 3 times. And I went to a women’s college, and have attended several women’s studies conferences. So the ‘all men are evil’ feminist is a VERY rare bird.
                I only wish the ‘all feminists are man-haters’ statements were as rare. ‘all feminists are man-haters’ is an obvious attempt to get women to disclaim feminism–when feminism is the radical concept that women are people as much as men are, and that people deserve choices in how they want to live their lives.

            • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

              The key idea of feminism is about choice. Choosing to be a mother and wife is no less feminist than if you choose not to do that. It’s about the ability to choose what you want for yourself. If I want to iron my man’s shirt than who is to say that I “shouldn’t”?!! Hell, I make almost 2X more money than my man and still iron his shirts because (1) I’m better at it than he is and (2) I like it. I dare anybody to tell me I’m not a feminist!!

              • your not a feminist…bitter troll bases that off nothing at all then the fact bitter troll was dared

              • Rattus says:

                Agreed. I do whatever insignificant amounts of ironing get done in our house. Not because my husband asks (or, god forbid, tells) me, but because he has no qualms about leaving the house looking like a sharpei and I’d just as soon he didn’t.

                • Cat Lady says:

                  LOL! Love this comment.
                  Polo shirts and no-iron trousers are your best friends in this regard. I haven’t ironed anything except sewing projects since the years started with 199X.

              • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                My problem with “feminism” as defined is it isn’t really about choice or equality. I’m all for women having equality. Let them get paid the same for the same work. If they want to be police, firefighter, or military then by all means hold them to the same physical standards as the men. If women want to be considered equal then have equal standards. (I’m sure I’ll get a few, “But women are physically weaker than men on a regular basis per genetics”) I call BS on that. If they want to do the same physical means as a man, let them pass the same physical tests.
                Also don’t get me started on “feminsim” in the courts. Utterly destroying father’s rights, one case at a time.

                • I’ve seen a decent amount of that, luckily, the women who run in the same crowds as I do have a logical view of the matter. Equal pay for equal work, meet the standards or gtfo.

                  They are also perverts, which is always a plus. I find the world would be better with more of them in it.

                • mabsba says:

                  It depends on who’s doing the defining. You did a fine job — equal pay for equal work, etc. And there’s still lots of cases where that is not true, incidentally. (BTW, our women cops have the same tests and training as the guys, which has been true everywhere I’ve lived.)

                  I don’t know about the ‘father’s rights,’ either. I mean, it used to be that mothers automatically got custody, which was wrong, but I see that changing. And just like changes in the other direction (I never knew a female doctor in the 70s and now they’re half of med classes), it does take time.

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    Must not be in America. (cops standards)

                    There are multiple cases where Mothers who are abusive, and it’s been shown to courts that they are, have gotten custody of children b/s “Women are better at rearing children than fathers”. It’s sickening and demeaning. I haven’t really seen a trend go other ways. Of course there are too many father’s out there that fit the “stereotype” of not caring, but really I think of that as the exception not the norm (I hope.)

                    • mabsba says:

                      Oh,no. It’s definitely improving for fathers. But it’s hard when the default is set to the other gender. (Believe me, I know. My field is not exactly female dominated.) Part of the problem is you have to either replace or re-educate all the judges who have that mindset.

                    • In Missouri, it’s extremely hard for fathers to get custody. I know of one mother in particular who is drugged out, abusive, and God know what else, and her ex had a hell of a time getting custody of their daughter from her. And she’s already got her back again.

                      • mabsba says:

                        I know. It’s so ridiculous how long it takes courts to catch up to reality. Like the JP in LA who wouldn’t marry the mixed race couple? Hello! 21st century knocking!

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        I don’t know the exact situation in that case, but one problem with our current system for custody in most states is that once it’s set (whether by agreement of the parties or by the court) it’s extremely difficult to get it changed unless there’s agreement. You pretty much have to prove abuse or neglect at that point to get a change of custody (which it certainly sounds like he should have been able to do…sad.) I understand the theory that the courts don’t want to be bouncing the kids around like superballs, but I don’t think our current system is good either.

                  • dissimilitude says:

                    Actually, if you go back far enough (prior to the 19th century), it used to be that fathers automatically got custody in a divorce. The development of what was known as the “tender years doctrine” led to mothers getting custody most of the time; legally this is no longer supposed to apply in most states. (I’m not saying that it doesn’t, informally.)

                    Personally I think that people who have children and are divorcing should, regardless of gender, be willing to take a step back from their personal animosities and work together to determine how they can both best meet the needs of their kids.

                    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                      I think whomever can provide the most stable environment for the child to grow up is best. However the bigger issue is that in many a divorce the women tends to get the house, half the savings, which in turn gives the advantage to the mother to “get” the kids due to “less destruction to the lives of the children to continue living in the same location as before.”

                      • mabsba says:

                        When this is true (of the house), I can understand that argument. However, in reality, after a divorce, the most common situation is that the women and children have a drastic drop in their standard of living and the men have an increase. E.g., if they start out middle class, the men move to upper middle class; the women and children move to lower class.

                        My personal observation has been that the parent leaving usually doesn’t want the kids, so custody is more about the custodial (abandoned) parent trying to get money for the kids. Which sucks, but is another example of why a lot of people shouldn’t breed.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          Side story, here: when I got divorced some 11 years ago, I considered trying to keep the house. Then I considered that he’d been putting off pretty much ALL maintenance and repair for the past few years. I rented an apartment and told him he could keep the damn house. The water heater gave out the following week. :-P

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          That’s the mentality that feeds women getting the kids…. father wants nothing to do with the kids. I also find it hard that the father who has to pay child support (sometimes up to 20% of paycheck) can have a higher standard of living. Also if the mother had a job outside the house I find your arguement lacking as well. Only if the mother was a stay at home mother who relied on the Father’s income to keep the hosue afloat can I see standard of living decreasing.

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          20%? My fiance’s paying close to half his paycheck for 2 kids.

                        • mabsba says:

                          I am only repeating statistics from our state’s newspaper (yes, we only have one to speak of) about the change in status. But those statistics are readily available online for the nation as a whole.

                          I don’t know what you mean by ‘mentality.’ If you’re referring to my personal observations, that’s a gender neutral statement. I have seen both happen (parents of both genders abandoning spouse and children).

                        • Default User says:

                          PB, 20% isn’t that bad in my opinion, if the other parent has sole custody unless they are already rich they are probably going to need that financial support. Raising kids isn’t cheap.

                          I personally haven’t actually seen most of the unfair cases you(everyone now, not just PB) are mentioning. In most of the cases of people I know (including cases from when I was growing up and my friends were the children) it’s mostly been a case of one parent actually didn’t want custody or both parents shared custody. Though there was one case that rather angered my involving a friend of mine. When he was 16 a senior girl at his high school didn’t know what she wanted to do with her life., then she figured it out, she wanted to be a mother, she convinced my friend to cut class, go home with her, have sex with her (yeah, none of that was overly difficult) and then lose his virginity to her without using a condom (that was the part that caused trouble, but hormones won out). He’s been paying child support for that since he turned 18. He did actually try to argue statutory rape because he was 16 and she was 18 but the judge didn’t take it. I feel it was unfair to make him responsible for the child when it was in this case the woman who intentionally got pregnant because she wanted a baby and he just happened to be the luckless sob she choose to be the father.

                        • froofrou who is pissy today says:

                          I WISH we only had to pay 20% to that soulless harpy who keeps the kids now…..And God forbid if a promotion does go through, her first stop after hearing about it will be court to file for more.

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        Well, also it’s not unusual that the mother’s been more involved in the daily lives of the kids (as far as actual caregiving goes). I’ve seen crap on all sides. I’ve seen deadbeat dads who refuse to support their kids and stop spending time with their kids when the kids get old enough or cynical enough not to be easily manipulated. I’ve seen gold-digging bitches who will take the kids as far from the dad as possible without having to get the court’s permission to leave the state and make it near-impossible for the dad to spend time with the kid.

                        But, I’ve also seen (a few) couples who have managed to share responsibility and time with their kids; who can be civil, even friendly, at holidays and special occasions, and who both seem to grasp that whatever failings their marriage had, they’re both decent parents working together to try to raise good kids. It gives me hope.

                • viking gal says:

                  As for the physical standards, the change in standards & carrying procedures for firefighter work has resulted in a HUGE decrease in the injury rates of the male firefighters. Which means a decrease in workman’s comp. claims having to be paid out by taxpayers.
                  Within reason, I can see your point. But take some time to explore the possibilities before saying ‘no!’

                  As for feminism in the courts, I assume you are speaking about parental custody/child support, and about not sexual harassment, discrimination, women as judges, or reproductive rights? (aside from abortion–lets stay away from that one today, OK?)

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    I’m talking custody rights at this point (hence the word Father’s rights, and part of it is abortion/ child support arguement but we’ve been there before.)

                    I’m sorry I prefer higher standards. I’m a big guy, and I want someone able to carry me out of my burning house if need be, workman’s comp is a price I’m willing to pay in the case I ever need someone like that.

                    • dissimilitude says:

                      I’d support high physical standards without regard to gender (for firefighters); I’d rather have a big, strong woman trying to rescue me than a little chubby guy….

                      I think the point with workers comp is that the change in carrying procedures reduced injuries, correct me if I’m wrong there, VG. (I hope the change was more than just putting up posters in the firehouse that said “Be safe, use your knees when you pick people up!”)

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        I have an image of a poster with a firefighter in a bar with a drink having a gal sitting on his knee, and the wording you said. Is that sexist? :-)

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          No, just funny. :-)

                        • viking gal says:

                          Diss has it right, the co-ed firefighters has changed the procedures for carrying a human out of a building. And it has reduced injuries greatly–which had not been expected when they instituted the change in rules. Basically: no more ‘Rhett and Scarlet’, no more ‘sling him over your shoulder’. Now they wrap the vic’s arms around the firefighter’s shoulders, the firefighter keeps a grip on the elbows (near mid-chest on the firefighter), and carry the vic down like a backpack–balanced across the spine and therefore safer for the carrier.

                      • mabsba says:

                        I believe diss is correct. I have a female firefighter friend who been a firefighter for a LONG time (about 20 years), and she talks about the improvements that have been made along those lines. She would be my #1 pick for rescuing me. :)

                        And I do live in the US. All my life, in several states. And the cop standards were identical (male/female not state to state) in all of them.

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          State Troopers might be, but local standards are different, especially per County/ Township. Even the FBI has slightly different standards for men and women.

                        • mabsba says:

                          God. Way to nitpick. Well, perhaps I was not clear. I only put ‘state to state’ because otherwise people would think I was talking about state standards being equal (which they aren’t). I am and was talking about local, ie city, town, county etc, forces. Everywhere I have lived, the standards and training have been the same. Period. That’s my experience, for where I have lived, so please stop repeating that local standards are different. That blanket statement is NOT true.

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          Just b/c the places you lived held the standards the same NOT everywhere has, that is my point. So I stand by it and will continue to stand by it.

                        • mabsba says:

                          It sounds like you were saying that all local forces have differing standards, which is not true in my experience. Of course, some that I don’t know about may (how could I know that). But I don’t/didn’t contest that. I just was saying it wasn’t true for all of them.

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          The we’re in violent agreement so let’s go kick some troll a$$!!

                        • mabsba says:

                          But there are so many to choose from! How will we pick?

                        • mabsba says:

                          Oh, no. We scared bitter. *pats bitter* We’re sorry. We meant the nasty trolls, not you. Look, my son didn’t eat all the cookies and no rhubarb! *gives bitter cookies*

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          OUCH!! Bitter watch the fingers!!

                    • Default User says:

                      I’m a big guy, and I want someone able to carry me out of my burning house if need be,

                      Having no idea what you look like or how much you weigh, I can with 95% certainty that my old boss is half your size or smaller. Not only can she pick you up and carry you out of the building she can do it at a run if need be. She was one scary woman.

              • Almost? Slacker. My wife DOES make 2X more than I do. And that’s while she’s going to school. Thus, I get to do all the domestic stuff (cleaning, cooking, laundry), and FTR, I SUCK at it!! OMG, I hate housework with a passion.

            • viking gal says:

              There are a few–very, very few. About as common as the albino gorilla.

              • Green Beard the Canuck, Pirate of the Mighty Bow River says:

                It’s kinda that whole ‘the mad dog barks the loudest’ thing again Militant Lesbian Feminists are rare, but they are loud (and scary… seriously I had one tell me all men should be castrated by rubber band except a few to keep around until they work out parthenogenesis) and so when guys think of Feminists that’s what comes to mind quicker than the less… aggressive… feminists

                • Justacarolinian says:

                  Garp bit bonky!

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  Who was that Feminazi (b/c she was) who wrote all straight men who’ve had sex with a woman are rapists, b/c a woman is forced into sex due to society or some $hit like that?

                  • Danbala says:

                    Andrea Dworkin? I think her work is interpreted as something like that most of the time, at least.

                    • the magic of cut and paste

                      In 1987 Dworkin published Intercourse, in which she extended her analysis from pornography to sexual intercourse itself, and argued that the sort of sexual subordination depicted in pornography was central to men’s and women’s experiences of heterosexual intercourse in a male supremacist society. In the book, she argues that all heterosexual sex in our patriarchal society is coercive and degrading to women, and sexual penetration may by its very nature doom women to inferiority and submission, and “may be immune to reform.”[55]

                      Citing from both pornography and literature—including The Kreutzer Sonata, Madame Bovary, and Dracula—Dworkin argued that depictions of intercourse in mainstream art and culture consistently emphasized heterosexual intercourse as the only kind of “real” sex, portrayed intercourse in violent or invasive terms, portrayed the violence or invasiveness as central to its eroticism, and often united it with male contempt for, revulsion towards, or even murder of, the “carnal” woman. She argued that this kind of depiction enforced a male-centric and coercive view of sexuality, and that, when the cultural attitudes combine with the material conditions of women’s lives in a sexist society, the experience of heterosexual intercourse itself becomes a central part of men’s subordination of women, experienced as a form of “occupation” that is nevertheless expected to be pleasurable for women and to define their very status as women.[56]

                      Such descriptions are often cited by Dworkin’s critics, interpreting (sometimes even falsely quoting) the book as supposedly claiming “all” heterosexual intercourse is rape, or more generally that the anatomical machinations of sexual intercourse make it intrinsically harmful to women’s equality. However, critics such as Cathy Young point out that numerous statements in the book, such as “Intercourse is the pure, sterile, formal expression of men’s contempt for women,”[55] are difficult to misinterpret.

                      Dworkin rejected that interpretation of her argument,[57] stating in a later interview that “I think both intercourse and sexual pleasure can and will survive equality”[58] and suggesting that the misunderstanding came about because of the very sexual ideology she was criticizing: “Since the paradigm for sex has been one of conquest, possession, and violation, I think many men believe they need an unfair advantage, which at its extreme would be called rape. I do not think they need it.”[58]

                      • mabsba says:

                        This is good. We were missing the ordinal post. But this one is related to the topic…does that disqualify it? :(

                      • Danbala says:

                        Oh, the “Indeed.” was for bt’s post, not for mabsba’s. :p

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        yeah that’s the b*tch!!! :-)

                      • n00b says:

                        Wow, just wow…

                      • viking gal says:

                        Just for a bit of perspective, Dworkin was writing at a time when most western medical textbooks were ignoring the sexual functions of the clitoris. So, yeah, back then women’s sexuality was marginalized in a big way.
                        Why do I know this about texts and the clitoris? Because I like old textbooks on medicine and sexuality! :P

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        The whole double-standard thing is what I have a problem with; there’s still plenty of guys out there who have a problem with women who DO like sex. Which mystifies me….you’d think they’d be in favor of that.

                      • Default User says:

                        In response to Bitters copy and paste, I’d like to say a belated “FIRST!”
                        @VG In Scientific American magazine a few months back the theme was the beginning of things. One of the articles was the vibrator, clitoral stimulation was used to help reduce “Female Hysteria” something at the time was considered a valid psychological condition. This was mid 1800′s, they continued the practice into the 20th century before finally figuring out that the paroxysm that were caused were actually sexual in nature.

                        @Diss I agree completely. I like having sex therefore I’m a slut, if I were a guy I’d just be normal.

                      • Danbala says:

                        Yeah, I can’t dismiss Dworkin too easily, I think she’s a bit misrepresented by the misinterpretations. (Gosh, that must be the first time that has ever happened to anyone.)

                      • dissimilitude says:

                        @ DU: I think they may have been onto something. I find I’m generally in a much better mood if I’ve been having regular orgasms. ;-)

                      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                        Diss that is your mistake right there. “How many men does it take to give a woman an orgasm? Who cares!?!?!?” :-)

                        So really you don’t need sex for that. :-)

                        I don’t live by that standard, if she likes sex, give me her number, is she doesn’t send her to Rando. :-)

            • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

              “You mean coitus?”
              “It’s a male myth about feminists that we hate sex. It can be a natural, zesty enterprise. “

  7. bob says:

    that guy is my hero

  8. Steve says:

    this guy is a DJ on a Boston radio station (he’s either Toucher or Rich).
    he also did the same thing during a Hilary Clinton rally in 2008.

    • Darrkwolff says:

      It’s Rich. He used to be on a morning radio show in the Dallas metroplex area, and he was talking about holding that sign during a Hillary rally, and how Hillary commented on his sign.

      • Tankard Hoot says:

        This was Rich during a stunt when he was on a morning show here in Atlanta. This pic was taken during the Masters tournament in Augusta about the fact women aren’t allowed to join the golf club.

  9. eNSIXX says:

    How many feminists does it take to screw in a light bulb?

    The Answer: 3.
    One to screw in the lightbulb while the other two perform a sexual act on me. Bazinga

    • i_@m_1 says:

      At least we can screw in a lightbulb and satisfy your needs, what have you done for us lately?

      • The Steve says:

        She really should be able to screw in the light bulb and perform sexual favors at the same time.

        • keithybabes says:

          While ironing a shirt.

          • Default User says:

            We can only do that if you’re wearing the shirt at the time.

            • mabsba says:

              And guess where the light bulb is going…. ;)

              • Naoyusimi says:

                HA! Mabs.

                How many men does it take to screw in a light bulb?

                Only one. He holds it up and waits for the world to revolve around him.

                • mabsba says:

                  That sounds more like a teenager. :D

                • paws4thot says:

                  How many radicalc feminists does it take to change a light bulb?

                  None; they form a support group, then sit about in the dark waiting for the light bulb to decide that it wants to change!

                  • n00b says:

                    Radicalc? Is that feminists that are good at advanced mathematics?

                    • Default User says:

                      Mabs! Are you a radicalc feminist?

                      • mabsba says:

                        Well, I wasn’t going to point this out (having already been accused today of ‘bragging’ on such things), but calculus really doesn’t count as advanced mathematics. It’s a required course for engineers, after all! :D

                        Definitely a feminist in the true definition of the word, not what the whacko trolls (is that redundant?) have been saying. But also lucky that my feminist parents (yes, men can be feminists) taught us that it’s about women being free to make choices, not what choices women make. (I still remember my mom being really mad at someone who was criticizing a mom for choosing to stay home with her kids. :) )

  10. I’m making a prediction: The Belgian Flag of this LOL is gonna be “and they never will.” Let’s watch and see how it plays out, shall we?

  11. Sqwirk says:

    That guy is bald with glasses and a beard.

    I think he’s mistaking feminism for his being unattractive.

  12. i_@m_1 says:

    He should have known better than to piss us feminists off. Let this be a lesson to all pigs out there.

  13. keithybabes says:

    I like the ‘Sexism is a Handicap’ poster. Do sexists get affirmative action, or their own bus?

  14. cgray says:

    All feminists are butt ugly. That’s why they hate Sarah Palin. She’s hot, they’re not, and she can probably iron a shirt better than they can.

  15. n00b says:

    Wow, two funny ones in a row! Where am I?

  16. Mina says:

    (Just for you Rando)

    …and they never will.

  17. did the shirt ever get ironed????

  18. Sara says:

    How to get your shirt ironed:
    “Honey, you look so nice today and I am such an idiot I can’t even turn on an iron…I was going to run to the mall….but this stupid shirt I want to wear looks terrible..”
    “Oh you are such a dufus, let me do it for you..”
    Bingo..shirt ironed!!

  19. slaggingham says:

    My wife irons my shirts (the few I still own that aren’t wrinkle-free never-iron types.)

    But only because I am retarded at doing it, and she’d rather not be embarassed at the way I look — it’s embarassing enough already.

    And because I ask nicely. And buy her things.

  20. cgray says:

    Viking gal, my hot milf wife doesn’t let me date ugly lesbians like you. Sorry. And yes, she knows how to iron.

    • viking gal says:

      I’m not lesbian. And I’ve been told all of my life that I am on the other side of the spectrum from ugly. But you keep telling yourself that, if it helps you maintain your fantasy world.

    • viking gal says:

      Oh, and I have been remiss. Given my politics, I DO know several lesbians. Lets’ see: cute, cute, waay gorgeous, cute, cute, attractive in a handsome way, cute, quite presentable. Nope, no ugly lesbians, sorry!

    • “Hot milf wife?” Oh, you wish, you little turd. We all know you’ve never seen a woman naked.

      • dissimilitude says:

        Not to stray too far off-topic here, but I really have a strong dislike for the term “milf”, because of the implication that there’s a general rule that women who have given birth before (mothers) are not normally sexually attractive.

        • mabsba says:

          Now I’m sure someone will insist that you just don’t have a good sense of humor or don’t get the joke properly. :D

          PS But I agree with you. ;)

          • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

            “are not normally sexually attractive”

            Of course they aren’t. Aren’t they just baby making/feeding machines on legs?

            • Default User says:

              Actually I think it’s not that women who give birth aren’t sexually attractive, it’s more the idea that your friends mothers aren’t supposed to be hot because, well, they’re your friends mom. When I think of MILF, I always get the idea that the person using the term is a high school boy.

              • dissimilitude says:

                Ah…that makes more sense. I hear guys MY age using it though…generally meaning, as far as I can tell, “hot woman over about 30 or so…”

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  BUT under the age of 45, b/c then you get into Cougar territory.

                  • viking gal says:

                    Rawr!

                    • Default User says:

                      I thought you could hit cougar at 35 providing you were preying on guys sufficiently younger (i.e. barely legal)

                      • mabsba says:

                        That sounds right. But since Nao pointed out that cougars are chasing younger men and I already have one that comes instead of having to be chased, I have decided that being a cougar is silly. :D

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          DU: I’ve chased AWAY men that young . . . damn, they are pushy these days with older women. I wonder if my mom ever had that problem. Come to think of it, she DID date a guy, when I was in high school, who was 26 . . . that’s right. She almost didn’t date him, because she thought he was too young! LOL
                          She was 40 or 41. Then, she ends up marrying my stepdad just 4 years later, who was 11 years younger. In both cases, though, they did the chasing, not her.

                        • Default User says:

                          Mabs: I think they like the chase, as do the younger men, it’s the whole playing hard to get thing.

                          Nao:I’ve heard alot of guys say older women are more generous in bed, might explain why they’re so pushy.

                          When I’m older I really don’t think I’ll make a good cougar, I slept with a guy who was about for years younger than me (he was 19), I didn’t find out his age till after and I honestly felt dirty for that, and not the good dirty.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Nao, the older you are, the less the same age difference matters. I.e., 35 is fine if you’re 45, but 15 when you’re 25…ew…and illegal. :)

                          DU, mine has never played hard to get…at any age. :D

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Want to know the bad kind of dirty? I didn’t do anything but drool all night, but the night my stepbrother got married, I met my new stepsister-in-law’s brother . . . OMG, was that guy hot-hot-hot.

                          I found out much later in the evening that he was STILL IN HIGH SCHOOL. I was 34 or 35 . . . I felt pervy-icky!!
                          (OK, what’s the code for the blushing, again?)

                        • mabsba says:

                          :redface:

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Mabs: I know about the older age +/- same years-thing, but at 41, 26 was too young; at 45, 34 was OK to marry.
                          LOL
                          It wasn’t THAT different.

                          Years later, about a month before I turned 39, I met a guy who wouldn’t give up until I went out on a date with him. He was 28–same age difference.

                          My fiance, who’s 1 year younger, has NEVER dated in his own age cohort . . . he says (in an attempt to needle me) that 1/2 his age is about right . . . I don’t give him the satisfaction of much more than a squinty-eyed glare. :P

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          I guess I should say, “He’s never dated in his own age cohort . . . until he met ME.”

                        • Default User says:

                          Either he’s saying you look alot younger than you are or he’s saying you’re really immature for your age :D

                        • mabsba says:

                          Still can’t figure out the stupid redface. That’s what it says in ‘properties’ for the blushing face.

                          I dunno, someone in their 30s is waaaaay different than someone in their 20s. But really, it’s been so long since I dated. Some guy was chatting me up at the store, so I pointed out that my ring was a wedding ring (it’s a sapphire rather than a diamond so not everyone realizes that) and he said ‘Oh, that’s okay.’ I told him that if that was okay with him I wouldn’t be interested in going out with him if I wasn’t married. Yuck. Guys like that make me glad I am married. :)

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          D.U.: I prefer to think HE matured a LITTLE, AND I’m younger looking that I am.

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          For the most part, Mabs, I agree that guys in their 20s are too young/immature for long-term (fun for a fling, though :D ), yet it really all depends on where you’re at in your life and what you want out of it. If he wants what you do, then there’s no problem. I know several May-December couples (most of them older guys/younger women, of course) who seem to do just fine, and have been together long years.

                        • mabsba says:

                          So, Nao, when your fellow says that he likes women half his age, you say, primping, “So you must be talking about physical appearance, right?” The beauty is what can he do except agree that will end well for him. :D

              • justacanuck says:

                I had a hot photocopy repair guy call me a “yummy mummy”. He was ten years younger than I, I was not offended.

          • Justacarolinian says:

            Oh, NOW you get a sense of humor. Sheesh

            • Naoyusimi says:

              Are you confused? She doesn’t like the term . . .
              Just cuz she pasted some smileys on her post, doesn’t mean she’s laughing about it.

              Or am I confused?

              • mabsba says:

                No, you’re not. I was just ignoring him. According to ILPB I am a cougar now anyway, so it’s no longer relevant to me. *skips away singing “I love kitties”*

                • Naoyusimi says:

                  You’re a cougar? You said you’ve been married 23 years . . . how’s that a cougar?

                  • mabsba says:

                    Actually together 23, married 20. But I thought that was the natural progression (from MILF, which I repeat I do dislike, to cougar)? *goes to check wiki*

                    • mabsba says:

                      Ahem. Yes, well. I fit the *age* part of the description at least. :D

                      • Naoyusimi says:

                        Yeah, I haven’t wikied, or anything, but I think the term applies to women who seek out young men . . . .

                        Which, a few years past, I guess I could be guilty of . . . :D
                        Now, my fiance is 1 whole year younger–and he loves to call me “grandma”–I’m going to kick his little behind, one of these days!

                        • mabsba says:

                          My husband is almost exactly 5 years older than I am. But he doesn’t use dead mice as cat toys! Still ew.

                          Of course, we would never touch a dead mouse with bare hands because of bubonic plague. ;)

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          Oh, that’s what’s wrong with him! Now, I get it. :D

                        • mabsba says:

                          Oh, sorry. Thought that was obvious. (It is, after all, the only thing I know about him.)

                          *now envisioning Nao introducing him — “This is my fiance, who uses dead mice as cat toys.”*

                        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                          Hey grandma iron my shirt, and fetch me a beer on your way to the luandry room!!! :-)

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          I said HE calls me that, and I’m going to kick his little behind, one of these days . . . . what do you think I’m going to do to YOU?

                        • mabsba says:

                          *mabs reappears, waving stungun* Sorry, I had to go to work again. Would you like to borrow this, Nao?

                        • Naoyusimi says:

                          I had to go,suddenly, too. Just got back, but I’ll borrow that and lie in wait for that churlish character . . .

  21. cgray says:

    Feminism is stupid. If women want something, do it the traditional way. If I piss my wife off, she threatens to kick me in the n*ts. Works like a charm. It’s called compromise.

  22. Women -blank- while corprate CEO’s play…

    what is the blank we cannot see?

    bitter troll hope it says Iron

  23. Daniel says:

    Yeah, equip fanatics with extremly hot metal objects and then insult them. Great survival strategy.

  24. Schmoe says:

    Okay, all men are total scum. If it would benefit my wife in the least I’d commit suicide. There. Does that placate all you women who have been abusing me in so many ways all my life?

  25. Schmoe says:

    “We live. We die and death not ends it.”-Morrison

  26. Azkyroth says:

    “Iron my shirt, bi—HEY! GYAH! I MEANT – OW! – AFTER I TAAAAAHHHHHKE IT – YEOW! – OFF!”

  27. Ferret says:

    So, did they ever learn their lesson and iron his shirt? I’m curious to know.

  28. marlo says:

    If you really want something done you’ll do it yourself though.
    My girlfriend is messy, but I don’t tell her to clean up after herself, I fold up her clothes and put them away and generally tidy up her mess, I kiddingly bring it up but I don’t care, because I’m the one who doesn’t like the mess… and I quite like tidying up.

  29. *sigh* Oh I do love the smell of a sexism debate in the morning, smells like victory.

  30. mai left b00bie... u sux it says:

    Hi good-lookin’! I’ll iron your shirt… you have to be wearing it at the time, though. >:)

  31. EvilDave says:

    As so many seem to think it would be OK to kill the guy, does this mean it is OK for men to kill women who talk smack about men?

    Or, are you just a bunch of hypocrites?

    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

      **FLAME ON**

      • EvilDave says:

        It is not my fault most feminists are hypocrites.

        They think it is funny to talk about abusing and killing men and fly off the handle when someone makes a similar joke about women.

        They protest anything they see as degrading to women, but think anything that shows men as useless and incompetent is absolutely hilarious. Just browse any greeting card shop.

        They say they can do the same jobs as men, but only as long as the physical requirements for them to do the job is different. Just look at the PT tests for women vs. men for the police, fire departments, and military.

        Feminists don’t want equality, they want superiority.

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          Radical feminists do want superiority, however they are in the minority. Most feminist want equality, it’s just the bitterness seeps through. So you’re pretty much an a$$hat for generalizing people. You’re also a hypocrite for getting pissy about generalizations towards men, when you’re generalizing people.

          • EvilDave says:

            Most feminists want superiority and are just quiet about it. When was the last time you heard of feminists making a stink about a women-only anything?

            Seen any feminists protesting Shapes because Shapes is unisex?
            Seen any feminists protesting Hallmark because they have cards that are degrading to men?
            Seen any feminists arguing that the physical requirements for any job should be the same for both sexes?

            No, but you see just the opposite with feminists protesting men’s only establishments, anything that makes women the butt of jokes or degrades women in any way, and claiming that, while they can do everything a man can do, they have to have special, and easier requirements.

            You just don’t like people showing you how hypocritical feminists actually are.

            • n00b says:

              The one thing I don’t like about feminists is that they don’t seem to want to speak out about the atrocities on women in muslim nations. I just can’t understand that at all. But they will diss any western man for the tiniest hint of chauvinism

              • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                Gross generalization, n00b, gross generalization.

                • n00b says:

                  You think? I think it’s political, feminism has gotten too political. It should be about women, all women and their rights to equality or to at least be treated well…

                  • mabsba says:

                    How can that not be political? One has to use the political process to change discriminatory laws (regardless of whom they discriminate against).

                    • n00b says:

                      But, my impression is it’s gone to far to one side of the political spectrum, instead of being about all women, left and right. You can be pro woman and still be conservative, like myself.

                      • mabsba says:

                        Yes, but it’s a bit like being a Republican teacher. Historically, it’s not the side that has supported teachers, so you’ll be the odd man (hee hee) out. We all have to live with our choices, political or otherwise. :)

                      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                        You have that impression because the loudest voices on either side of the aisle tend to be, well, the loudest and most extreme. Those are the people that forget that feminism is about equality and choice. Being told that you’ve made the wrong choice, regardless of what it is, is anti-feminist and anti-woman.

                  • Bitter wino, the wine steward says:

                    I don’t really know what you mean by being too political in this context. Maybe examples would help?

                    Not to mention that feminism means a lot of different things in different contexts and to different people.

              • mabsba says:

                OMG, I don’t know what kind of women YOU know, but this is a frequent topic in all the circles I frequent. Perhaps there is a reason you are hearing about ‘western men’? ;)

              • viking gal says:

                As for atrocities in Muslim nations, I read about the Taliban, and the crap they were doing to the women in Afghanistan eons before 9/11. Actually, I believe that George HW Bush was in office when I read that article…in a feminist magazine known as ‘Ms’. Here is an article from 1998 on the topic {http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?id=3281}

        • dissimilitude says:

          It is not my fault most people are hypocrites.

          There, I fixed that for you.

          • mabsba says:

            Cookies for diss for being the fix-it girl! :)

          • EvilDave says:

            No, you broke it. Just because you don’t like the message or the truth, it does not give you the right to change either.

            • dissimilitude says:

              So your world view is that hypocrisy is now limited only and solely to feminists? That’s interesting.

              Wait, though, does that mean that everyone who’s a hypocrite is also a feminist?

              • EvilDave says:

                See, there you go trying to change the message again. Maybe you should take a reading comprehension course. Maybe some logic courses too.

                I see you like to use red herrings, trying to change the argument to something you can win instead of the actual discussion. And, your second paragraph shows you have no clue about logic.

                You argue just like a liberal and a feminist, by purposely misrepresenting and misstating what is said by your opponents and then acting on your own misstatements and misrepresentations.

                • dissimilitude says:

                  Nope, you said “most feminists are hypocrites”; I pointed out that most people in general are hypocrites, and you….apparently disagree?

                  Logically if, as I propose, most people are hypocrites, and accepting the premise that all feminists are people, then your statement is, of course, true; however, I think it’s unnecessarily limited in scope.

                  • mabsba says:

                    Now, now, diss. You know all that logic stuff is too hard for the boys to understand. ;)

                    • dissimilitude says:

                      Apparently I’ve been hanging around with too many liberals; I’m bilingual now! I can argue in liberal! Lol….

                      *sigh* Let me rephrase this, Dave: Why would you expect feminists, as a group, to be any less hypocritical than other discrete groups of people or than people in general?

                      • bad fairie says:

                        because men are perfect and can do no wrong no matter what (according to my former mil…… i used to tell myself she was being sarcastic, but then one day i realized she meant it ! )

                        • mabsba says:

                          That’s always rather frightening when you’re having one of ‘those’ discussions with someone and you think they’re joking and then realize that they are totally friggin’ serious. I had one of those with someone about Mexicans once…. *shudders*

                        • froofrou who isn't as pissy today says:

                          Messicans?? Damn Messicans? Always comin’ in here and stealing our jobs, riding our women, and raping our bikes…..

                        • mabsba says:

                          Now that would be funnier if it weren’t close to the content of the conversation. I was getting pissed because I thought the guy was making these racist jokes, then I realized that he really meant it. Ew.

                        • Default User says:

                          My poor bicycle is still in therapy….

                        • mabsba says:

                          My friend has a nice unicycle looking for a buddy….

                        • Default User says:

                          So long as it isn’t of messican, those just bring back the memories, and the nightmares. Ever hear a bicycle wake up screaming?

                    • EvilDave says:

                      Surprise surprise, a sexist comment degrading men. Why am I not surprised? You are hoist on your own petard.

                      Seeing as logic was pioneered by men, I somehow doubt the truthfulness of your statement.

                    • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                      And you argue like a liberal, Diss!! Buahahahahaa!! :-p

                    • n00b says:

                      Eeek! mabs you aren’t making it any better! Logic stuff is too hard for angry frothy trolls – there, that’s better!

                  • EvilDave says:

                    No, I said you are changing my statement into something I did not say. You fixed nothing, but rather reworded what I actually said into something that did not make the point I was making. And, you did it because you didn’t agree with it, not because it was false.

                    It is limited in scope because of the scope of the statement in general. You wish to change the scope to dilute the effect of the argument. And again, you are doing so because you don’t like the message.

                    Rather than deal with the message, you change the message into something you prefer.

                    • n00b says:

                      Calm down! You got dumped recently, didn’t you? Who hurt you!? WHO!!??

                    • mabsba says:

                      It’s called a syllogism. Diss pointed out that your statement (Most feminists are hypocrites) was the the concluding statement of a syllogism beginning with her statement (Most people are hypocrites). The inference, of course, being that your statement although true (by syllogism because her statement is true) brings no new information.

                      One could just as easily have said that most men are hypocrites, that most women are hypocrites, most lumberjacks are hypocrites, etc.

                      Diss, I still think it’s too complicated for him.

                      • HelOnWheels the Gene Pool Lifeguard says:

                        Lumberjacks are not hypocrites!! Lumberjacks are “okay”!!

                        *starts singing*

                        I cut down trees. I skip and jump.
                        I like to press wild flowers.
                        I put on women’s clothing
                        And hang around in bars.

                        MOUNTIES:
                        He cuts down trees. He skips and jumps.
                        He likes to press wild flowers.
                        He puts on women’s clothing
                        And hangs around in bars?!

                        He’s a lumberjack, and he’s okay.
                        He sleeps all night and he works all day.

                      • EvilDave says:

                        Unfortunately, that syllogism is a red herring because we are not talking about all people but just feminists. In other words, trying to change the statement and argument, which is the point of a red herring.

                      • EvilDave says:

                        Oh, and her argument is also a logical fallacy: Appeal to common practice.

                        Something is not right, justifiable, etc. just because it is a common practice.

                        • Classicist the Zappaist says:

                          HI STRAWMAN HOW ARE YOU?! YOU SEEM TO BE DOING FINE TODAY CAUSE I SAW WHAT YOU DID THERE!

                    • dissimilitude says:

                      I’ll try this again. It’s not a matter of diluting your argument, it’s a matter of “Well, duh. Like everybody else.” I’m not sure from what you are getting that I “don’t like the message” as I’m clearly in agreement with you that the group you are discussing, like the majority of people, can and does have hypocritical attitudes and behaviors.

                      • n00b says:

                        He just wants to be angry and yell. You were interfering with that reason and logic stuff…

                      • EvilDave says:

                        You are not in agreement with me.

                        I do not believe all people are hypocrites. Of those who are hypocrites, fewer still behave as feminists do, to wit not only to engage in the behaviors they decry but also to emulate all the worst traits of those they decry and still claim moral superiority.

                        • mabsba says:

                          Okay, apparently a reading fail as well as a logic fail. No one said ALL people are hypocrites.

                        • EvilDave says:

                          Fine, I do not believe most people are hypocrites either.

                        • dissimilitude who is Not a Fvcking Mindreader says:

                          Well, I’m glad we were able to clarify your position.

                        • Woman hating troll hates women…and fear them…fears them greatly…

                        • keithybabes says:

                          You can take it Dave. Be a man.

                        • Default User says:

                          I figured out who this EvilDave guy is! I met him a few years ago, he was sadly friends with some of my friends. I remember him because at one point he had me in a corner and was going to try things I didn’t approve of(at least I didn’t approve of with him). I maybe pulled a knife on him when he didn’t take no, hell no, back the fsck up, and I mean it, for an answer. Knife to the chest is a very persuasive argument. But if all his ‘dates’ go like that one did it would explain why he’s so bitter with women.

        • Charro God says:

          Do you think maybe you could find an unbiased source for that, or are you committing the fallacy of Hasty Generalisation?

          Are you going to compound it by adding an Appeal to Authority?

          Come on EvilDave. Let’s play.

  32. Classicist the Zappaist says:

    Feminist women who still think that guy’s sign is funny must post \/ here \/ .

  33. Marie says:

    This picture was doctored. The word “bitch” was not on the sign. One side said, “Iron My Shirt,” and the other side said, “Make Me Dinner.” I know. I was there.

  34. ... says:

    I heard this guy on the radio this morning so this caption is fail.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Toucher_and_Rich_Show

  35. Me :D says:

    Feminists are pretty sexist…

  36. Danbala says:

    What do they mean with “sexism is a handicap”? Does that imply that one should feel sorry for sexists (and racists and other stereotypists) for their handicap? Can’t say I wanna. :p

    • dissimilitude says:

      I can’t tell for SURE, but it kinda looks like to me that the protest may have something to do with golf….which would make “sexism is a handicap” a pun.

      • mabsba says:

        Some where on this thread someone said that it was outside a men’s only golf course, so that’s probably it. (Although I didn’t catch the pun until Diss pointed it out — not one of my sports.)

        • dissimilitude says:

          If we can have gyms just for women, why can’t you have a golf course just for men? Unless it’s a public course, I guess.

          • mabsba says:

            Yes, a public course obviously can not be allowed to discriminate, but I don’t know where this is. I only know what little I read from the person’s post, sorry.

            • I Like Peanut Butter says:

              It’s a private course. Augusta is privately owned and is very exclusive (only 300 members at any one time).

            • dissimilitude says:

              A little google-fu suggests that it may be Augusta National, which is not just private but insanely exclusive. Apparently there’s been ongoing controversy blahblahblah over the fact that they don’t have any female members. There’s apparently only about 300 members at any given time and it’s insanely exclusive with a huge waiting list. They don’t have any particular policy barring women (or anyone else) but they didn’t have a black member until 1990….I get the impression that it’s not a place where anyone moves up the waiting list too fast unless they could potentially make an offer to buy the place outright. And apparently women are allowed to play there as guests of members, so it’s not like they’re completely banned or anything.

              Seems a silly thing to make a huge fuss over, but then I don’t play golf and if I did it’d probably be on one of our local public courses, so maybe I just don’t “get it”.

              • mabsba says:

                Yes, still cleaning my pretty, WORKING dryer so no googling time. Thanks for info. BTW, Augusta only allowed their first black member because the PGA announced they were not going to hold any more tournaments any place that discriminated on the basis of race.

                That’s most of my golf trivia right there! :)

                • viking gal says:

                  And I think the PGA was forced to confront Augusta on that because Tiger Woods was going pro. And it would look REALLY bad to have a PGA tournament at a course where Tiger Woods would not be able to be a member… Whoops!

                  The fuss over men-only golf courses is based on the fact that inviting a colleague to play a round of golf at one’s country club is a time-honored way of firming/developing business contacts.
                  Me, I like the quote attributed to Samuel Johnson about golf…it ruins a perfectly good walk!

                  • mabsba says:

                    I think that was Twain. :)

                  • froofrou who is pissy today says:

                    I have a serious problem with forcing a private entity to do anything it doesn’t want to do. The sanctions are just fine, but to force Augusta to allow women as members just because some women are pissy about it is stupid. Go, form your own, No Boys Allowed golf course and shut the hell up! As Diss pointed out, if we can have all-girl gyms and whatnot, why can’t the guys walk around in all of their old man nekkidness without having to worry about a woman seeing it and being scandalized??

                    • viking gal says:

                      They’ve always had women play there–as guests. The women can’t be members, so they can’t invite guests. And of course since women don’t occupy most of the fortune 500, they don’t tend to have the moulah as of yet to buy and start their own golf courses.
                      It isn’t as big an issue now as when you were in diapers, so it is a bit hard for you young pups to understand the urgency of the 70′s and 80′s for this sort of thing. *creeky voice* Now back when I was your age…!
                      Now of course we have up-and-coming women forming wine tasting groups and so forth!

                      • froofrou who isn't as pissy today says:

                        Either way, the libertarian side of my brain goes all twitchy at trying to force a private organization to do something because someone else thinks they should. Or not do something because someone else is pissy about it. ARGH.

                        • viking gal says:

                          I understand your twitchiness. I share a little bit of it; but have more experience with the other side of things, having grown up pre-Xena. I sooo wish I had had Xena on tv when I was a kid!

                    • Danbala says:

                      “I have a serious problem with forcing a private entity to do anything it doesn’t want to do.”

                      I totally agree. Private groups or clubs should be allowed to discriminate as much as they please. (But of course it should still be perfectly fine for anyone to protest against them as much as they want to.)

      • Danbala says:

        Oh, I didn’t see that, but when you say it it seems plausible. :)

        … but then they’d be saying that sexism is a great equalizer system that allows people to meet and compete on somewhat more similar terms?

        My ickle gurly brain gets overheated now!

  37. Dr Knockers says:

    WTF is going on here, can we get back to the Sexist b’stard in the picture? Any “bitch” out there prepared to straighten out something of mine that’s all wrinkled and could do with an “iron”?
    Dr K

  38. D the Bag says:

    That’s Rich Shirtenlieb from Totcher and Ritch in Boston, Morning on 98.5 the Sports Hub. That guy is friggin hilarious!

  39. Nihil says:

    he will never find a womens body….

  40. Monika says:

    oooohhh, he should have gone with the classic: “Make me a Sandwich” I am thoroughly disappointed.

  41. bob says:

    that guy is my hero.


Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    viking gal on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Liberty on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Thatgamerguy on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    SemperGunny on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    The Amazing Rando on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Kn0wledge1ne: King o… on Gates Angry! Gates Smash!
    dan_144 on Gotcha
    The Amazing Rando on Which One Has The Vodka?
    SemperGunny on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    The Amazing Rando on Captionable Photo of the Day: …
  • Hall Of Fame


    Classic Political LOLs!

    Hall of Fame


  • Tag Cloud

  • See Random Political LOLs

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog