This is how you know
This is how you know Armies are run by men
What is happening in the picture? Tell us in the Comments
Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Joy via Our LOL Builder
You May Like:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Disney Merges | STRESS Next »
» 229 comments
-
Recent Comments
dissimilitude on WOOPS dissimilitude on Let’s imagine the look o… Raptor007 on Get of your n10bettes on WOOPS AC on WOOPS mabsba on Let’s imagine the look o… shortright the ivani… on TRAIN ORIGAMI mabsba on TRAIN ORIGAMI I want to beat EWAda… on TRAIN ORIGAMI Rattus on WOOPS 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Join NOW!
Join who? or what? and why?
Where do I sign up?
SPAM!
You are correct sir. This one was here before under a different name.
and why now?
yvaN eht nioJ
You didn’t name yourself L. T. Smash, so I award you no points.
Anyone else notice there isn’t a bit of cellulite to be found.
Stockings help hide that. Not to mention it’s typically found on the backs of the thighs, and you really can’t tell much from this angle & distance. Why don’t you get closer?
No, closer.
That is because they appear to be models. Probably not much jiggle, either.
Although cellulite is not caused by an excess of weight. The more fat you have, the worse it is, but skinny girls can have cellulite too.
yes, we do have tons of it, we just know how to hide it better.
They are rather looking like flight attendants…
Maybe they are fight-attendants…
Coffee? Tea? Beatdown?
win!
And who says that’s a bad thing?
well DUH….Everything is run by men.
You keep thinking that…
Yet women admit they dress for other women- not the men in their lives.
Who told you that one?
::snortsintohand::
After a couple decades into life, you will realize it is true. Guys don’t care about the pushup bra–they would rather see you without one. Ditto for the fancy hairdo, earrings, etc. They like the effort, but couldn’t care less if you are fashionable or not. The massive fashion and grooming thing is a form of female competition.
V-neck sweaters and tight clothing is for the guys.
Yes. it’s not the clothing that matters, it’s what lies beneath..
Don’t believe all of it. They like the fancy bras and the cheeky panties. I didn’t buy my first Aubade bra & shortie set because I loved the hefty price tag! I said, lookit this, it’s pretty! My BF said: Get it. NOW.
Fashion? Yeah, it’s to look good, and I suppose, with some women, it’s competition with other women.
C’mon. You seriously believe that your BF would care if you were wearing Gaultier or GAP? Doubtful. Most men don’t really care what you’re wearing. If Fruit of the Loom made under-things as high quality & pretty as Aubade your BF wouldn’t know the difference. You don’t hear men commenting on women’s outfits. Whereas women do that ALL the time.
There’s a difference between cute/sexy and expensive, although with underwear in particular it seems like they coincide a lot. Little lace panties that are designed to make your butt look cuter are both more attractive and more expensive than the bargain panties from Family Dollar. If I found something awesomely cute at Family Dollar, though, I’d buy it and wear it proudly and I don’t imagine either guys or girls would really care that much about the label.
Ok, I’ll admit I really don’t hang out much with people who tend to care about labels and brands.
How long will these girls spend on totally guessing in the dark what guys want?
A. Forever
or
B. Until the end of time
text your answer to 12343 and win completely nothing*
* texing will be seen as legal surrender of your soul to Satan. Lucifer, Satan, Hell and all other related names are copyright proterties of EA.
Hmmm. I had a long reply typed out to this and PK ate it. How long will you guys spend trying to figure out what girls want?
I think we’ve mostly got a clue what guys want: Food, beer, and sex. Possibly sports. And not to have to Talk About The Relationship.
We want revolution
Constant evolution
Diss has this all figured out.
I would probably order it Food, Sex, Beer…but it’s a personal prefernce and changes from guy to guy.
Really, the only two universal wants of a man are food and sex. If he doesn’t have a stiffy, make him a sandwich.
i would be scared of catching a disease from any panties at Family Dollar lol
Hel: You’ve apparently missed my point. Completely and utterly. “C’MON.” I NEVER SAID A BRAND MATTERED. I mentioned a brand for illustration’s sake, only.
VG said ” . . . guys don’t care about the pushup bra . . . ” & I replied that they LOVE the lacy & fancy underthings. As for what BRAND? NO, I never said he cared about what brand.
As for others saying: “we’d rather see you without”; I was trying to give a different perspective: his (and some other men I’ve *ahem* talked to). Simply put: they LIKE the tease. They LIKE to see a hint of something, but not always ALL of it. He likes it when I’m walking around the house in bra and shorties, getting ready to go somewhere . . .
I get really sick of this attitude that women are horrible to each other, when I’ve heard plenty of men make the catty comments and run each other down–NO, not about their “outfits”, but they find plenty of other things. Let’s face it: men and women aren’t that different. When they sense sexual competition, they do two things: 1) Go on the attack; 2) Do something to impress.
Pics?
You wish.
What do you mean don’t believe it? How can I not believe the evidence of my own central nervous system? That way madness lies!
Sorry, Keithy….my reply was meant for VG. I meant that some of her reply was valid, in my experience, but some of it: not so much.
It’s run by gay men, judging by the standard of tailoring.
win
I doubt that … there’s no consistency with the skirt length, or jacket length … WTF … I thought the military was all about conformity.
And how DO they fight in those heels?
Ever had a stiletto in your eye?
Not since I accidentally tried to put a collar and leash on Chelsea Clinton…..
You haven’t seen Chels lately have you? Once she was past the awkward years, she got really CUTE.
Jane, I said, “IN those heels”, not “with” those heels.
Oh, well if you’re going to be picky about it. ;P
That’s me! I’mma detailed oriented.
Sometimes.
::getsouteraser::
Dammit.
Details are important, they’re what won us ‘nam.
… or are you just sad to see me?
does anyone else see the pending up-skirt photo?
I’m thinking about it, but I don’t see it yet.
“These are Ucrainian policewomen” post in 3, 2, 1…
Russian
Belgian!!!
Socialist!!!
TOO SOOOOOOOON!?!?@EEJ@#IF#I$
Bulgarian.
This is the legged forces division of the Secret Society of Sexist Sexists.
*salutes*
Sexists Society of Sexist Sexists….we’re not really a secret.
Whatever…you expect me to think before caffeine and after looking at all those legs and heels?
You saw all those legs and still needed caffeine? Shoot, I’m an ostensibly straight woman and my first thought was “wowza, lookit those gams!”
Oh, it woke me up…but it didn’t engage the “thinking” brain.
O_o
Don’t get like that.
God gave us two heads and only enough blood to work one at a time.
Which is a good thing. Think how much worse your gender would have screwed up the world if that wasn’t the case.
Or how awesome it would be if we could be horny and have deep thoughts at the same time.
“Darling, what are you thinking?”
“Just wondering about Cantor’s theorem on mathematical infinities: oh and boobies”
I’m saluting with my gun.
Not my rifle.
Something’s rising, but it’s not the urge to join.
Oops, wrong LOL.
THE FLAG IS BELGIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Russian Police
Oh please. You really think men rule the world? We just let them think that – it makes them happy. All we have to do is put on short skirts and heels and watch them fall at our feet.
Psst, don’t forget the cleavage. The core of democracy has been shaken by many a low-cut sweater…
And oddly enough, we really don’t mind. “No, the cleavage…it’s making me lose power…and I like it…”
Rando’s right. People assume they’re like a tractor beam we want to run away from, but it’s a conscious decision.
“Let’s see, I give up decision making for awhile and I get to look at them? I can do that.”
You know what I call a man who won’t let women manipulate him with sex? Stupid.
Is it manipulation if you’re aware and agree to it?
Only if the guy has to “manipulate” it on his own later.
The proble if women truely ran the worlds is either Severe negotiations or wars would be started at least once a month.
**puts on jester’s hat and dances around** I am so sexist, I am so sexist…
After a FB conversation last month, I guess that is true for SOME women. Not this one! Well, so long as I have enough chocolate… Chocolate in every house, and peace in our time!!!
Which makes me think of a tee-shirt slogan I saw once:-
“Give me all your chocolate, and no-one gets hurt!”
**buys stock in Haggin Daz** Alright we’ll give you the Golan Heights for two ship containers, one of Chocolate Chip the other of Cookie Dough.
. and don’t forget the chocolate cakes!!!
*Hands ILPB a membership form*
Sign here please.
**starts signing** I better not get any spam or telemarketing cards from this…
No, we don’t allow that sort of thing.
However, our sister organization AAAM may require you to occasionally oggle and objectify our lovely female counterparts….as a critical part of their membership screening process of course.
Robin Williams fan huh?
*She’s standing with AK-47 on top of the roof just screaming GET IN THE HOUSE!!!11 GET IN THE FU<KING HOUSE"
Robin has his moments.
Yes, but they’d be over much sooner than 6 or 7 friggin’ YEARS!!
(And everybody would hug at the end! So, there!)
Hmm…don’t know about that. I remember hearing that the SAS terrorist manual says that in a gender-mixed group of terrorists, shoot the women first.
Err, why’s that, because we (the women) fight harder?
(That was kinda my point, too, particularly with the implied menstrual irritability about which ILPB posted, above.)
Hey! I gave you the little winky face! Don’t jump on me!
(But what I said is actually true, and it’s because women never give up — else we wouldn’t have survived as a species!)
Also, I would think that the men would work harder to “protect” the women. Just a theory. Isn’t that one of the reasons cited as to why women shouldn’t be in actual ground combat situations?
It’s certainly one of the excuses cited. But in evolutionary terms, for mammals (which we are, despite some bible thumpers disavowal of this fact), the female protects the young. I think I was speaking a little more long-term than you were reading.
‘zactly.
I think our wars would mainly consist of spreading rumors behind China’s back and telling the rest of the world that they’re not allowed to be friends with Iran anymore or we’ll never talk to them again.
Psst, did you hear who France is sleeping with this week? I so told you she was a skank!
That Swedish tart!
“Look, if you start disarmament right now…you can look at our boobies.”
“Where do I sign?”
Jane: That’s how the U.S. fights, now …
Say! Who’s running this show, anyway? The 4th-graders from Hell?
Yeah, the similarities were unintentional yet obvious and painful when I was reading it back after posting.
And then go back to working for less pay…
Okay, that was mean of me.
You can’t have the power all the time.
Women are smart enough to know this.
Ya know, I am going to stop right here since this argument is going to get very circular on the side of women having more power and I was only going for mildly caustic levity in the form of sarcasm…
round and round the garden,
like a Teddy Bear……
Something like that but with more raspberry jam and less tuna fish.
Anchovies?!?!?!
Hey! If it smells like tuna, see a doctor!
me too. I suppose a smily face would have helped that.
Embrace the awesome power of the smiley face. :biggrin:
Why does my biggrin not work?
: D works. Without a space. Like this:
Testitng:
Thanks! And thanks again for adblock.
It is more my fault than yours. I’ve been really pissy for months now. It is most of the reason for my continual absence. Speaking of which…
*vanishes*
Darn! Too quick for my pouncing.
I am sure with more training, you could be the best at pouncing but until then… *poofs*
I’ve been spoiling her recently, I tend to be a sucker for the pouncing..
Just means she won’t catch me nearly as often though I abdicated pretty much all the pleasures of being president when I left so I can’t truly have a platform to complain from.
Well you know… we do have torture sessions in the Bedroom of Doom now… they involve a lot of pouncing, and considering how we seem to be having more and more company during the sessions these days, I’m sure you can get all the pouncing in that your draconian heart can handle…
Just… bring a towel… never come to the sessions without a towel…. never.
My time came and went so I am fine with missing out. Enjoy yourselves though. *vanishes*
I’ve been really pissy for months too. That’s why I come here. Gotta have someone to take it out on.
‘zactly.
I rest my case.
Skirt budgets have been cut again.
The ministry of defense has maxed out?
Even worse, they cut the waxing budget. ::shudders::
You should see what they can do with sharpened, depleted uranium.
I love the part where the line up in formation and get to practice picking up ammo off the ground from the parade rest position.
“Oops, I dropped it again! Will you pick that up for me? Oops, I dropped it AGAIN!”
I approve of this army.
That’s a wave of destruction that’s easy on the eyes!
Haha Zapp ftw.
Cham-paggin?
I’m going to need another angle…I can’t decide who wins the award for shortiest skirt.
I’m game to be on this committee of judges if you want.
I never could run in heels ……
Me neither.
Uh, not that I’ve tried.
I made a bet with a girl one time about that.
Stupid me.
Men’s center of gravity is not conducive to walking in high heels. Men’s center of gravity is the chest and women’s is the hips. When you add an extra 4+ inches to an already high center of gravity it can only spell disaster.
Not realizing that is what made me stupid.
Actually most men’s center of gravity is right around the navel. Most women’s are yeah, right in the center of the pelvis.
Call Dana Scully, she’s a complete pro at that.
I must agree; she was pretty much the Running in Heels World Champion.
I would hate to see the condition of her toes, now.
You say that like it’s a bad thing… d^_^b
So this caption says that the women wouldn’t doll themselves up if they had the chance? Oh right, only because men are the only ones who want to see women look pretty.
Would “pretty” be what it was today if billions of dollars weren’t spent on advertizing telling you what was in fact “pretty”. Those product execs might have some females on the board now, but they certainly didn’t when it started. And that’s just modern history. We have been a patriarchal society since the dawn of man.
Well, that’s hardly been universal, especially if you’re going all the way back to the dawn of man.
I’d certainly argue that we’re not (those of us in the USA, at least) living in a patriarchal society now, at least not by any definition of the term that’s not so watered down as to render it meaningless.
but watering down terms is the key to victory in any argument where the end result is you walking away assured of your own superiority right?
*Soccer guy scream* SCOOOOOOOOORE!
When comparing myself to a few of the posters on PK, I don’t even need an argument for my smug feeling of satisfaction. Thanks for your help!
Depends on which Dawn of Man story you like. And you can argue what you want. Take a look at wages earned, top earners, and percentages of each. Denying that we are still largely patriarchal is still false in my opinion. No watering needed.
If you’re going to make the argument that money is the best measure of success ….which I wouldn’t have expected from you.
I wasn’t measuring success. I was measuring control.
If you’re looking at the high-level corporate power structure, yes, it’s still largely male. A better question might be “is it still largely male because women are somehow prevented from participating or because women are less likely to give a shit about defining themselves as ‘Chairman of the Board’?”
Anyway, looking at it that way, given that 99% of men in our culture wield less financial power than these guys, it’s less patriarchy you’re talking about and more about oligarchy.
When you look at day to day power issues between normal people, it’s a completely different perspective. We don’t live in a culture where female children don’t inherit, or wives are treated as property.
“If you’re looking at the high-level corporate power structure, yes, it’s still largely male” – Well there you go then. The corporate power controls the government. The government “controls” the people (for now). It is a patriarchal oligarchy.
I am going to go with your option A on the second part. Clearly, it’s not because women aren’t interested in being CEO’s. That’s like saying that pre-integration that blacks just weren’t interested in being on the police force.
99% of men, 99% of women equal out. Now look at the top 1% and tell me what you see.
Day to Day “normal” interactions vary from instance to instance.
Honestly, I think there’s a smaller percentage of women who actually give a shit, or at least give enough of a shit that they’re willing to make the necessary sacrifices to attain that type of power.
Yes, normal interactions vary. But in our culture, if a teenage girl or young woman’s father is trying to force her to marry his business partner, she doesn’t have to. If a woman wants to vote, she has the same right to as a man. Women can own property and have all the same legal rights as a man. I guess my question to you is: If you want to call what we have in our culture patriarchy because the top levels of power are dominated by men, then what the hell are you going to call a culture where women CAN be forced into marriage; where they aren’t accorded the same rights to own property; where they can’t get the same education as a man? In my opinion, using the term patriarchy regarding our culture pretty much explicitly devalues the term.
Its not only the top levels of power actually, first of all even doing the same job women make less money. In Sweden that number is 12 percent, and were one of the most gender equal countries in the world (according to the UN, WHO and a bunch of others). More than that, jobs that have a female dominated workforce are severely lower paid than sectors that are male dominated. Compare nurses and construction workers for example, nurses have more education but get paid worse. And if you take skilled labour like electricians or plumbers and compare them to nurses then the numbers are ridiculous.
The work women do is judged as less valuable inherently by the market, because its women doing it. Nothing to do with productivity.
Apostrophe fail… sry bout that, keyboard is shit.
You overlook the fact that construction workers are far more likely to be unionized. (Well, ok, I don’t know if that’s true in Sweden?)
It’s certainly true that female-dominated professions pay less; some of that is, well, kinda left over from when it was generally considered ok to pay women less overall. Things don’t change overnight and quite honestly you can’t compare apples and oranges (“Hey, I have to be outside in the rain! And I hurt at the end of the day….and have a far greater chance of being killed or badly injured on the job.” “Yeah, but I have to deal with ACTUAL shit. Blood, too.”) But a male construction worker and a female construction worker doing the same job should earn the same; as should a male and a female nurse.
I don’t know about the average of this profession, but my mom’s a nurse. She makes almost as much as my dad and pokes fun at him because she doesn’t have to be around chemicals and (insert large number) psi valves all day. My mom loves her job, and doesn’t PERSONALLY see any bias in her wages and the men she works with. Could just be our area though. *shrugs*
I’m a licensed veterinary technician -another position that is also usually female-, and I get paid a LOT less than the male-dominated jobs. And, you know, I also hurt at the end of the day… have to deal with an interesting variety of bodily fluids… deal with cold/rain/etc… deal with pissed owners… and have to deal with possibly getting killed or badly injured on the job. So, uh… that whole more hardcoreness in male jobs thing is stupid. I want their salary.
You’re looking at it in a- “well, they don’t have to do that anymore- therefore, they are equal!”
White males are the most privileged in society (looking at USA stircly, that is where I live). They own most of the wealth, run most of the gov’t, and have most of the power. If you are saying, then, that that has nothing to do with men and women being equal then what does? How are men and women equal? Socially? They get the children in a divorce?(That really evens the tables- I get the kids, you get higher pay) Are you also going to point out that most of these women in a divorce end up in poverty while the opposite is for men who get custody?
You misunderstand. I’m not saying what we have is perfect or that we need to stop working for equality. I’m saying that it’s progressed to a point where to call it patriarchy in the classic sense of the term is inaccurate at best and disrespectful to the struggles of women having to live in true patriarchal situations today in other cultures.
Says the man. I’m a girl and I never ‘doll up’, as it’s a waste of time and completely impractical.
So yes. It is because men are the only ones who want to see women look pretty. You shave your legs, and I’ll shave mine, Richard. Or should I say, Dick?
Get many dates?
Maybe she does! Oh, you meant with men …
psst drag kings dont count hun, we mean real women
Um….I’m going to have to disagree with you there. I’m a woman, and I enjoy looking at pretty women. Pretty not necessarily meaning “fake” or “Barbie-doll” or “fashion model” but definitely including “takes the time and effort to take care of herself and try to look nice.”
I think she’s even more wrong than that.
Most men would rather just see you naked.
Most girls get dressed up for no better reason than to show each other up. I love it when a girl gets all dressed up, but 9 times out of 10 no matter how much I like the outfit, I’d rather just see her in lingerie or something slutty instead of a classy outfit.
I’m a guy. If it looks nice piled in a heap on the floor or hanging from the ceiling fan, it’s a good outfit.
I disagree. That slutty outfit (whether anyone wants to admit it or not) is worn by sluts.
I don’t want something that worn out. I mean I don’t expect everyone to be a virgin but at a certain points let’s all keep it in our pants.
I respect a woman who can look attractive without being slutty. Sexy stuff is for the bedroom.
That’s my two cents.
Who said anything about going out?
I agree with you. Like I said, if it’s just ME looking, then slutty is great. When I take her out to meet my friends, classy is the way to go.
Well, but she implied in her post that she doesn’t even bother shaving her legs. You really want to see that?
(Also, let’s face it — you see a naked woman walking down the street, your first thought is probably not “Damn, it’s my lucky day!” but “What the hell is wrong with her?”)
My first feeling in this situation is one of profound gratitude for being allowed to witness the beauty of the female form. Then my alarm clock goes off..
“she doesn’t even bother shaving her legs. You really want to see that?”
Oh, you Americans. ;p
It’s just hair. Who cares? Anyone who ever had an issue with me not shaving my legs, was not somebody who I valued my time with or cared about for longer than 25 minutes.
I think this falls into the category of why do you CARE if someone shaves her legs or his beard or not? Unless it’s YOUR significant other…I like my husband’s beard.
(Actually, I doubt I would notice if a woman had shaved legs or not.
)
I have to say, (and this is in response to some of the other things in this thread, not just what Diss said, this just seemed the best place to reply) I don’t shave my legs, it’s not that I don’t bother not to, but I get very bad razor burn, I don’t like the pain from the hair growing back and I have better things to do with my time. The only one’s who ever even see my legs are the people I sleep with and they don’t complain. Just because I don’t shave my legs doesn’t mean I’ve completely let myself go. I’m a big fan of regular bathing and grooming, and I like looking pretty, but shaving isn’t worth it to me. If you want to keep me supplied in veet or pay to have laser hair removal then go for it, but I won’t go through that much pain and annoyance for so little return. (Keithy I hope this doesn’t adversely affect our engagement)
Aren’t the English like the Europeans in that regard? Which should make it okay with keithy!
Yay! We’re going to have wedding cake.
So long they don’t have hairy chests or shoulders I’m good
Most of us guys shave our faces, and trim in other areas, expecting you to groom yourself isn’t out of line.
I don’t see how shaving legs can be all that bad…sure there’s a lot of skin, but it’s not all that badly contoured. (anticipates flames)
Try shaving your jaw sometime…or that little spot under your chin on each side that no matter which way you draw the blade it doesn’t shave close enough….Arggg!
I will respect that a woman does more trimming than a man I really will, but don’t sit there and tell me that it’s more painful.
“I hate shaving my legs!! It hurts!!”
“Imagine that on your face and neck every single day. At least you can wear pants to cover it up if you want to skip a day.”
*Ahem* If shaving your legs hurts, you’re fcking Doing It Wrong.
*snerk*
never hurt bitter troll to shave bitter trolls legs
Question is, where the hell do you stop?
just above the nipples
You have nipples on your legs?
no, bitter troll just keeps going and going
It’s not shaving the legs that hurts. It’s shaving other sensitive areas that’s the problem.
Here. let me help you with that…
I’ve learned from personal experience that we men are terrible at shaving that area….
Well the offer was on the vague possibility that Jane HADN’T learned….. :;:
I agree. I learned my lesson with that. It’s not so much the shaving, but the day after…
A neat close trim is good enough for me.
Better than waxing….
My response to waxing is…You First!
Seriously? I’d rather shave my face every day than shave my legs once a week. Shaving my face (yes, I have done it, nope, not hairy, just peach fuzz, but I was having a particularly low self-confidence day and felt hairy) takes a lot less time, and I didn’t cut myself in any heavily bleeding areas (ankle, knee, back of the knee) or even nick myself at all. Having a totally hairless face feels weird though, with dry skin, and then I broke out in a little red rash.
that was just the herpes
If a little peach fuzz is all you shaved on your lip than you have NO idea what it means to shave your face.
I wear my biker boots, a tee shirt, and jeans to my boyfriends house (no makeup, and I look like a drenched dog cuz I forgot my umbrella). He doesn’t care if I’m pretty. The tee shirts a V-Neck for comfort, and trust me, he doesn’t mind.
please dont feed the man hateing lesbains
Do it enough times in a row without even offering to look good for him and he WILL assume the you don’t respect him enough to even get dressed.
A few times = extremely cute, and comfortable around us
everyday = too lazy to get dressed
*blushes because the last two months of pregnancy were pretty horrific* I think I wore pajama pants every day.
Well I mean obviously that’s a different story.
My only complaint is unequal expectations. When I worked in a corporate office, guys were dressed if they had dress pants and a button down shirt. If women weren’t wearing jewelry and make-up, there was a definite attitude that one was casually dressed. Didn’t matter if you were wearing a freaking Evan Picone suit.
Maybe this girl and her boy have the same low level of expectations of each other. Then it works for them.
I don’t work in an office any more, but you can bet that I don’t see clients wearing my gardening clothes!
Right, ’cause if it were run by women, all their skirts would be hemmed to the same length.
They were originally…the especially scandelous ones rolle it up at the waistband like the cheerleaders did in high school….too bad none of my high school cheerleaders looked ANYTHING like these women…
… and now, out National Anthem, performed by ZZ Top…
*golf claps*
By the way, the cameraman in the bottom right corner (behind “men”) sure is getting a nice shot
As a retired military guy, something made me doubt this group as an actual military group. After a few minutes, it became obvious: those uniforms aren’t exactly uniform. That is, their shoes don’t match. Some are sandals, others slippers, pumps, etc. No army would march with various high-heels like that in the same formation. Except, that is, for the guys in Key West’s Banana Republic Army. Heheheh…
Also notice the option for a longer skirt. Only one woman is wearing it. Second to last row, second woman in. The only thing uniform about them are the coats and hats.
This is the Russian police force by the way. Been there, seen that.
Yeah, but did you get the t-shirt?
Is that man in front bowing?
He IS Belgian.
He’s holding a video camera level with the street. Either he’s a legitimate producer trying to get a cool shot of all their feet marching by, or else a perv who’s just about to tip the camera to check if he can see up their skirts. Or more likely, both.
That day, all female officers will be required to wear…
TINY MINISKIRTS!!!
again ttrample me!
this army was made by Roy Mustang
TINY MINISKIRTS!
Yes, because women NEVER dress in short skirts on their own, a man is always responsible.
Jeez, defensive much?
Directly or indirectly, a man IS responsible. If a woman wants to be sexually alluring, who’s she doing it for (if she’s heterosexual)?
However, if a woman wants to perform hand-to-hand combat, or fight fires, or clean the house, what is she going to wear? Yeaaaah, that’s right: a super-short miniskirt. Of course! ::rollseyes::
So no woman has ever worn a short skirt and/or a cleavagey top to say “I have a better figure than you” to another woman then?
I can’t speak for every single woman on the planet, because I don’t know how they ALL think . . . so, no, I can’t say no woman has ever . . . I doubt, however, most women think like that. I don’t. If I wear something like that, it’s male attention that I want. That other attitude is ridiculous. My not-so-humble-opinion.
Besides, I think the main point is the second thing you said — these are military personnel…in mini skirts and high heels? That would be great fun on, say, an aircraft carrier.
PS If a woman had picked the outfits, they would have matched, right?
Yes.
If I had picked the outfits, I would’ve picked heels that were not 3-1/2″ spikes; but then, I’ve got an ankle which is held together by 3 pins. I wear heels, but usually 2 or 2-1/2″ is about all I can do, for a little walking or more than a couple of hours, anyway.
LOL WUT.