Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

Ladies and Gentlemen



conspiracy theorist

Ladies and Gentlemen, Here we have what is called a classic retard. Not even smart enough to know no one will go to a friggen website with the word VIRUS right in the name.

(Conspiracy Theorist)

Beware of morons with signs

Picture by: roflcoptorFAIL Caption by: Grimmiekins via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 655 comments

  1. factory says:

    But some people go ther anyway. The deserve it I think

  2. M.A.D.MikE says:

    This site was brought down btw

  3. Alex Swanson says:

    People who are stupid enough to go to that site definitely deserve whatever they get.

  4. Russian says:

    Still better than mass media…

  5. gamingkitty says:

    If the site’s real/running, they’ll get more hits than you think. My cousin-in-law is constantly slapping down engineers who go looking for the virus du jour “to see what it does”.

  6. Bollo says:

    Yes because we all know the best way to avoid computer viruses is not to go to sites with ‘virus’ in the name.

  7. Katharina says:

    Of course your save on all sites that don’t have the word virus in their name, the same goes for files you download btw. And emails to of course.

    If you don’t know anything about this stuff then don’t make fun of people you think are stupid.
    And btw why would he walk around promoting his “virus” website? Have you ever seen a hacker do that?

  8. keithybabes says:

    I’m not going to touch that website, but others I’ve seen with 9/11 conspiracy theories were good for a laugh. The amount of time and mental (?) effort that people have put into proving that the government did it, is quite impressive.

    • Captain Wow the Ambassador of Awesome says:

      Have you ever talked face to face with a 9/11 inside job conspiracy theorist? BATSHIT crazy. There is NO way you can even come close to convincing them otherwise.

      • keithybabes says:

        Well, no. Almost a religious thing with them, isn’t it? The only similar thing here in UK was the nutters who thought Prince Philip organised Diana’s death. Mind you that one was easier to believe…

      • mothergoose says:

        I talked with one of those “conspiracy theory” guys once… I was amazed… they really believe their theory. If you talk to them long enough, you start to get sucked down the vortex of loony…

      • I Like Peanut Butter says:

        I was talking with one once. They’re thought was that a plane would be bigger than any side of the Pentagon. I asked one simple question, “Had you ever been to the Pentagon, and seen how massive it is?”
        “No! But this one website gave out the plans for the Pentagon.”
        “Really plans of a Secret Facility with TS potential was just posted ont eh website for anyone to see.”
        “See exactly an inside job.”
        It go worse from there… but in the end I kicked him in the nuts, so I won the arguement!! :-)

        • ay dios mio says:

          Hopefully he won’t be able to reproduce.

        • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

          Ro Sham Bo for the win!!!

        • MRob says:

          Hahah yeah funny… Of course its really quite easy to line up how big the side of the Pentagon is with the size of a Boeing.

          I tell you something which is even funnier though.

          So I was watching an “expert” on TV trying to dismiss how the hole in the Pentagon is clearly much smaller than a large passenger plane, and his explanation was that upon impact, the fuselage of the plane would penetrate the building, but when the wings reached the hole in the wall, they would pivot inwards effectively “folding in”. Man, I was studying mech eng in Uni at the time, sitting there with another mech eng student, and I tell you, once we picked our jaws up from the floor, how we laughed at the stupid prick!! And this guy was from Janes Defence Weekly!! WTF??!! HAHAHA!! Either he’s a complete and utter moron masquarading as an “expert” or he must have known what he was saying was utterly ludicrous hahahahah….
          …..
          ….Oh wait, sorry were we ridiculing people who belive 911 was NOT an inside job? Oh s**t, my bad….

          • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

            So your IQ is around 130-140 but you still can’t spell “defense”? Are you sure you didn’t accidentally add a 0 to those numbers?

            • Some pass me the shamwow. I didn’t have one of MY patented screen protectors on.

              • MRob says:

                ROFL I thought “hang on a sec is that right?!” – and yeah, turns out, defence is the UK spelling, defense is the US spelling…..man, the fails, they just keep on coming for your today, huh??
                Oh well, I should let you off for this really, since the US/UK spelling divide is something we are much more aware of than you, but still, I gotta say, the extra portion of irony is quite delicious.

            • MRob says:

              Wow, spelling nazi AND ad-hominem attack all in one sentence. Gratz?
              (Tad poor though I admit lol, too used to spell-checkers :p)
              (Oh and spelling ability doesnt necessary have anything to do with intelligence, I know a number of people who are seriously dyslexic but still very intelligent, so well done double fail for you)

              • Default User says:

                I know of people who are seriously dyslexic but have no trouble spelling. Reading on the other hand can be a bit tough sometimes.

            • keithybabes says:

              Ahem. That’s how it’s spelled in UK… just sayin’.

              • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                If this guy was from the UK I’d excuse him. He’s clearly a Truther from the States, however, who thinks he’s got it all figured out with his giant Stewie brain and has personal knowledge of the kahnspirasays all over the globe. Especially those masterminded by someone he’s admitted he’d rather think of as being less intelligent than a chimp.

                So he’s a douche :-)

          • You can have a high IQ and still be completely nuts. I think we have a winner.

          • UMMM ok says:

            You claim to be “smart” ( I assume that’s what you’re trying to imply at least)…so if a plane didn’t hit it…as you seem to be saying…..why is there video of an airplane hitting it,why were there thousands of people who SAW it and why was there airplane parts all through the building and besides ALL THAT, if the plane didn’t hit the pentagon, WHERE DID IT GO???

            So who’s the utter moron?

            • Default User says:

              Midgets did it. We explained all this. {http://punditkitchen.com/2009/11/23/political-pictures-conspiracy-theorist-classic-retard/comment-page-1/#comment-271330}

          • Scythelord says:

            Oh of course a planes wings wouldn’t get torqued inward when crashing into a building designed to withstand a nuclear detonation…. Jackass. Yes the wings will get bent inward. Basic leverage at work. A Boeing’s wings cannot withstand 500 mph in low altitude air, much less a building.

      • MRob says:

        The same is true of all beliefs, yourself included. Just as they would never convince you it was an inside job, irrelevant of any evidence that may be presented.
        Truth is that whether people believe it was or was not an inside job, tends to come more from the pre-disposition held before the fact. The human mind is incredible when it comes to inventing justifications for pre-existing beliefs (BOTH sides of the fence…). This applies to all areas of human endeavor, although religion, politics and (facepalm) science and probably the biggest offendors. Indeed, the fabrication of a cohesive internal narrative is one of the foundations for how the modern human gets through life.
        That said, drop your assumptions (haha if you can, unlikely) and examine the evidence for yourself. Something which, unfortunately, “deniers” very rarely do, but “believers” are able to do in abundance. Of course none of you will, least not for more than 5 minutes while fuming about how stupid some people are, because the you already “know” its retarded to even suggest it was an inside job. You knew that before 911 even took place.
        p.s. I am an engineer with an IQ around 130-140, so please, drop the “retard” tags kthxbai.

        • I am an engineer with an IQ around 130-140

          Are you a member of mensa as well?

        • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

          i have ONE simple yes/no question for you (which may lead to others depending on how you answer):

          do you believe george w bush to be more intelligent than 90% of the population, all other recent presidents and hundreds of intelligence agents (american and otherwise)?

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          So wait, b/c I deny it’s a conspiracy theory then I can’t “drop my assumptions” and examine the evidence for myself. I’ve examined the “evidence” myself. I’ve examined the fact that hundreds of people saw a plane fly into the pentagon. I’ve examined the fact that thousands of people heard the plane fly overhead (a passenger 727 makes a much spearate noise than a one engine drone). I’ve examined the phone calls from people aboard an airplane highjacked by Muslim terrorists. I saw with my own two eyes a plane fly into a building on TV. I watched on TV the Trade Center fall from the top, and collapse upon itself. (Funny how the explosives weren’t set off from the fires and impact of the airplane). I’ve studied how shock can effect metal and make thermal coverings just crack off exposing bare steel. I saw one engine from the pentagon plane being removed from the wreckage, and it’s serial number matched the number of the flight that flew into the pentagon.

          I think that the “believers” have a problem with the facts being shown them and their “assumptions” it’s from the ebil gubberment that it’s a lie.

          Ok so you have a “high” IQ, but common sense is lacking, b/c everyone online has huge….. IQ, I was saying IQ.

          • MRob says:

            LOL!
            Then fair play to you, you have examined the evidence and come to a reasonable conclusion. Note that I didnt directly say what I thought, I am much more interested in poking at people who dismiss it as impossible based upon pre-existing assumptions, which is at least as common to see as the people who believe it was an inside job for much the same reason.
            As for me, I see some big unanswered questions, but I’m not going to say 100% either way, because its frankly well outside the realm of my experience. I certainly see it as a distinct possibility, although I’m not interested in getting into a discussion of the evidence.
            And again, I was only objecting to the use of “retard” against people who entertain the idea that it was an inside job. Very unfair.

      • salspua says:

        So who made NORAD stand down? Extremists with box cutters? Osama Bin Laden, from his hospital room in Dubai? Men in a cave? Or could that only be an inside job?

      • coolidge says:

        I think I know what you mean. I say it is perfectly logical that passports, which are made of paper, would survive an inferno while a black box, which is made of metal, wouldn’t. I hear you about them conspiracy theorists being nutjobs. I mean so what that the twin towers shouldn’t have collapsed anyway no matter how hot and intense the fire was, and that there were eyewitnesses accounts of hearing explosions prior to the collapse, explosions which occurred long after the planes hit the buildings. Again, I hear you.

        • NRen2k5 says:

          I think I know what you mean. I say it is perfectly logical that passports, which are made of paper, would survive an inferno while a black box, which is made of metal, wouldn’t.

          No, what’s perfectly logical is that the impact or explosion could blow sheets of paper away while metal boxes would stay more or less in place.

          I mean so what that the twin towers shouldn’t have collapsed anyway

          Says who?

          there were eyewitnesses accounts of hearing explosions prior to the collapse, explosions which occurred long after the planes hit the buildings.

          Yeah, and if you actually bother to read the eyewitness quotes from their sources rather than from 9/11 Truth, you realize that what the witnesses were talking about was the sound of jumpers hitting the ground, not actual explosions.

          Reserve the sarcasm for when you’re actually right.

        • Bobnine says:

          I think the force of the explosion is the important factor, not the temperature. Things don’t need to melt to break. That said, the way the buildings fell looked very very similar to precision demolition.

  9. Aldyth says:

    The caption would really be funny if it didn’t insult people who have mental retardation. There is a world of difference between having retardation and being stupid. One’s a disability – which you don’t poke fun at. The other is an acquired condition brought on by making one bad decision after another – which you can poke fun at.

    • keithybabes says:

      Not sure which is worse. calling someone with mental retardation a retard or someone who’s being stupid. I’d go for the former, on balance. I think the word is commonly used of as an insult..

      • keithybabes says:

        Must learn to proofread.

      • Like I said below, I think calling someone “mentally retarded” has different connotations than calling someone a “retard.” I think the former has more of a clinical term connotation while the latter has taken on the form of an insult.
        Frankly, it doesn’t matter what the clinical terms are, people will always find ways to turn them into insults. Human nature apparently.

        • parksj1 says:

          I think it’s just like using the term “gay” to express displeasure with something. It’s offensive to a lot of people. Doesn’t matter how it got that way…it’s offensive to use “retarded” or “retard” to refer to something or someone as stupid. I’m not saying I don’t do it…unfortunately both words are still part of my vocabulary, but I have close friend with a child who has Downs Syndrome, and I know it hurts his feelings when I say something’s retarded. So I am trying to change.

          • ay dios mio says:

            Most of the gay people I know call stuff “gay” too. If you don’t think it’s right than don’t say it, but it really hurts the argument that it’s offensive.

            • A lot of the gay men I know make it their mission in life to declare their gayness repeatedly to every person that is withing shouting distance.

              • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                Dude that’s just gay to say that.

                • Hmmm, not really. I just got tired of the email going off every 30 minutes or so informing me that “wheeeeeeeeee, I’m gay” has posted another “suck my lolipop” post on Facebook.

                  • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                    you know you can block him from your newsfeed/live feed… right?

                    • Oh, NOW you tell me. Actually I didn’t have too. He made a remark how all straight people were evil and out to get gays, and I politely informed him that I could care less about his sexuality. He then got pissy with me, and removed his friendship, which was ok, as he was the one who requested it in the first place.

                      • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                        anytime you want to hide a person or application hover over the upper right corner of that news feed/live feed item. you’ll get a box that says “hide?” and if you click it it’ll block them!

                        i’ve blocked a lot of people from my newsfeed because they annoy me beyond belief.

                        • Yeah, I figured that out, but thanks!

                        • Yeah, that’s a handy little thing. I’ve gone so far as to make it so only a select group of friends on FB can even see my status because there were some people who repeatedly posted some insensitive comments about a certain sensitive topic (You know what I’m talking about). Ironically, the people posting such insensitive things were pregnant women. And I’ve blocked all people with new babies until the time comes when I can look at their profiles without twitching again. (And I’ll stop now since this isn’t really the forum to discuss such issues.)

                        • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                          *hugs rando*

                          pregnant women are either emotional sobbing messes or the biggest bitches i’ve ever met. not much middle ground. i fear for people when i get pregnant in the years to come… i’ve never been much to be an emotional sobbing mess, so i see myself being a raging bitch for nigh on 10 months.

                        • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                          Kiss my ass, Shorty ;-)

                  • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                    **eeeeearrrrrrrrrrrrr** Right over your head there JAC……. at least Rando got it.

          • Vila Restal says:

            Actually it’s wrong to call Gays gay as the homosexual lobby stole the term Gay from what it means – “Happy and Jolly” (You want a good laugh, try playing the song “When the Red Red Robin goes bob bob bobbing along” to a bunch of kids, and wait until you get to the term bright and gay and watch to see them creasing up in laughter.) See Gay should go back to meaning what it used to mean. (In the words of Clive James – “You can’t use the term Gay anymore. I like to think of myself as a pretty Gay kind of a bloke, but I can’t say that anymore”)

            • fizz says:

              Stole? Puh-lease :-\
              It was a euphemism / underhanded slur directed at effeminate men suspected of being homosexual . They just took it on as their own, thereby removing its sting.

              And now it’s being used as a pejorative again … “that’s so gay”. I don’t like that but I don’t get uptight about people “stealing” the word.

              Language and culture are dynamic … get used to it.

              • Default User says:

                Like the etymology of the word fagot. That word has had something like seven different meanings including a burden to carry, a bundle of sticks usually used as kindling, or a slur for old people.

    • bodo says:

      I thought mental retardation was defined as having an I. Q. below a given level? And being stupid is defined as, well, having a low I. Q. (not as specific though). Unless you only mean people with Down syndrome? I’m not making fun or picking on you, I’m curious.

      • I think they’ve leaned away from many of those “IQ” terms, like idiot, imbecile, moron, etc. because of how they’re being used now. Do they still use retarded? Frankly I hope they’ve found new and better terminology for those who are actually mentally retarded because that word has just been ruined. As much as I try to avoid saying it these days (being a compassionate bleeding heart liberal and all), a childhood where everyone called everyone else retarded (even people in my school with retarded siblings did it) makes it hard to break the habit.
        That being said, I think calling someone a retard has totally different connotations than calling someone mentally retarded. It seems to have gotten its own meaning away from the original term.
        And finally, congratulations, Grimmiekins on making the front page again! I’ve got to write some damn LOLs, Grimmie is kicking my ass on front page LOLs.

        • keithybabes says:

          Doh! Didn’t spot that either! Grimmiekins FTW! *mutter mutter s’not fair mutter mutter…*

        • I have a mentally retarded 13 year old, and the term they try to use to nice it up is “M R.”
          She is a very normal, rather intelligent young lady, with the exception that she simply hasn’t progressed passed the skill levels of an average 6-9 year old. Mainly reading and math. Though, like Autism or any such neurological disorder, there is such a wide range of what the problems are. And often there is a set of commonalities, though no distinct set of symptoms.
          Most adults recognize her disability, and treat her respectfully. It’s other kids that taunt her with a vengeance. Because she still thinks like a younger child in play behaviors, some have called her a baby, and that hurt her badly. I actually had to send my over sized 14 year old son to visit a few of them, with a word of advice….

          • viking gal says:

            I think that was probably an excellent lesson for the young jerks–that those they tease have people who care about them. I am sooo for the anti-bullying campaigns that have popped up in this country. About time!! If for no other reason than that un-redirected bullies tend to grow up to be lousy adults. Not to mention the real harm to the victims…

      • Aldyth says:

        To have mental retardation requires an IQ below 70. You can have a person of above average intelligence (meaning over 100) who is stupid – as in Sarah Palin.

    • Whatever says:

      I’m glad you said this. I was going to make a similar comment. This word used in this way has bothered me for a long time. It was bad enough when it was third-graders saying it, but now that those third-graders are thirty-somethings, they really ought to know better.

      Unfortunately, I’ve run into far too many people who are long past any age where “youthful ignorance” is remotely an excuse, who still speak and behave like children, and particularly rude children for that matter. Now that is the sort of thing that I would call stupid.

    • zoozoopedals says:

      Hear Here!

      Everyone knows that the politically-correct term for mental-retardation is learning disabled! Shame on you people.

      As an aside, the politically correct term for me is: “Oversensitive Self-Rightious Douchebag”.

      • Learning disabled covers a huge spread of disabilities. M R is the term used for the mentally retarded.

      • Aldyth says:

        Actually, you are not correct. The clinical definition of learning disability requires that the person not have a diagnosis of mental retardation. You can have a highly intelligent person who has learning disabilities. Albert Einstein had issues with dyslexia, the most common learning disability.

        The most politically correct terminology for mental retardation is intellectual disability.

    • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

      SILENCE RETARD!

  10. just another retard says:

    9/11 was an falseflag operation.
    Thermate in the dust
    http:// w w w .bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
    liquid metal in the rubble
    http:// w w w .youtube .com/watch?v=_wVLeKwSkXA

    • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist says:

      Hey! Way to have an appropriate name! *applause*

      I don’t think people really use the word “retard” or “Retarded” to connote someone with Downs Syndrome anymore. It’s more a low IQ thing these days. JMO.

      • Stupid assholes do it. I’ve heard it. I’ve also heard them refer to autistic people as retards, which just about sends me into a flying rage. My son is on the autism spectrum (not formerly autistic, but on the spectrum), and I mentioned that to the people making fun of autistic people. They STFU real quick.

  11. Fuzzy says:

    What does a virus do? It spreads, hence “truth virus”. Spread the truth.

  12. Dhoti says:

    Rhinovirus doesn’t spread rhinos — why should this Troof virus spread the truth?

    Time for some Troof antimicrobials, I think…

  13. F3N4T!K says:

    Really, anyone dumb enough to think the website is a virus is already too dumb to understand the content the website contains.

  14. TomTom says:

    9/11 was an inside job. Take 2 mins from your morning yuppy latte and google 9/11 inside job, take a look at thousands of websites devoted to the topic.

    Perhaps you might find something you didn’t expect to see…. the truth.

  15. TomTom says:

    9/11 was an falseflag operation.
    Thermate in the dust
    http:// w w w .bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
    liquid metal in the rubble
    http:// w w w .youtube .com/watch?v=_wVLeKwSkXA

    • The Steve says:

      Are you kidding? You beleive that crap?

      “That LOOKS LIKE melted metal.” So? It’s obviously Aluminum. Look at it, molten steel hardens to dark black. That’s whitish grey at best. Aluminum melts at a little over 1200 degrees F which is not at all an impossible temperature to reach in an intense fire.

      Even if you claim jet fuel couldn’t burn that hot, carpeting, office furniture, and anything else in the building would have also been burning. Fires in many buildings that aren’t fueled by tens of thousands of pounds of jet fuel reach the melting point of aluminum.

      Other aircraft fires where the jet fuel didn’t even ignite leave the alumium body of the fuselage burned to the ground, evidence that things like seats, carpeting, and other furniture can reach hot enough temperatures to melt aluminum. (Air France 358)

      In conclusion, you’re an idiot, and you can’t believe everything you see on YouTube.

      • Steel doesn’t have to melt in order to collapse under the weight of the building. Ask anyone who has had to use an acetylene torch to cut things up. You have to be careful how you do the cutting, so you don’t have things falling on your head, long before you finish the cut.

        • The Steve says:

          The video he links points to dripping “molten metal” falling from the opening in the building.

          I bothered to watch it before responding. I’m well aware that steel becomes structurally compromised far before it actually melts.

          • When *ahem* compressed under thousands of tons, hot metal would also drip. And it quite possibly would be the simpler alloy metals used for studs or other structural items in the building. Sorry if that seemed like it was pointed to you. It was rather to back you up.

            • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

              lets not take into considerationt he building was filled with items and stuff made of other metals and what not too.

  16. TomTom says:

    Nothing to do with the ‘Bush admin’ take time from your life to look it up yourself.

    Rando, I’m sure you’ve spent an extensive 2 minutes reading up on the subject. Just keep watching the baloon boy on CNN, all is well, all is well.

    • james says:

      The first post from “TomTom” had a line break after each sentence (fragment), whereas the second is written in block prose. The first had no misspellings nor abbreviations, but the second uses the abbreviation “admin” and misspells “balloon.”

      Conclusion: The 2nd post was written by the government in order to further obscure the truth about 9/11.

      • The Steve says:

        Hahah, I love Penn and Teller, and boobies, which makes it a perfect show!

        • Get over yourself! says:

          Sexist posturing. It’s actually the a@@holes you like.

          • The Steve says:

            Of course it is. I’m not a 14 year old boy anymore, I’m well past watching a show just for frontal nudity. Boobs on TV are eye candy, not entertainment. I need some funny @ssholes like Penn and Teller to make me laugh in between the eye candy.

            If enjoying the sight of a pretty naked woman makes me sexist, then I should join the sexist society of sexist sexists.

            • *hand clipboard over to The Steve*

              Sign on the dotted line..

            • There’s nothing more sexist than being attracted to women. How dare you, The Steve!!!!

              • Whatever says:

                “Being attracted to” and “Demeaning and objectifying” are not the same thing.

                For crying out loud.

                • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

                  clearly your a commie socialst murder from belgien who hates women and loves tacos…cause….TACOS RULE

                • The Steve says:

                  If you’ve ever worn a push up bra or high heals you’re a HYPOCRITE!

                  Your tits aren’t that firm, and you’re not that tall. You objectify YOURSELF. And we men thank you for it.

                  That doesn’t mean I would ever treat a woman as anything less than a princess.
                  (until they prove otherwise by being a lying cheating b1tch)

                  • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

                    no no no women have the right to want to feel sexy, but not looked at like they are sexy…..and its ok for them to lie to men about what they really look like…because clearly men are all pigs

                  • Default User says:

                    I don’t I’ve put on a pair of heels since High School, and that was a special occasion. Also, I sure as hell don’t need a push up bra thankyouverymuch.

                    • Default User says:

                      I don’t THINK I’ve put on a pair of heels….

                      Or I don’t think. Whichever.
                      Must learn to proofread one of these days.

                  • Whatever says:

                    Oh, yeah, of course. Wearing high heeled shoes is totally exactly the same thing as declaring myself to be a public sex object.

                    And of course all women are either “Princesses” or “Lying Cheating B1tches”, and that’s not demeaning at all.

                • I suspect there’s a good (big) middle ground between “all chicks is good for is fvcking….hey, baby, take yer shirt off! And make me a sammich!!” and “OMG can’t look at boobies must respect womyn for their brains only don’tlookdon’tlookdon’tloooook!!!”

                  This middle ground would clearly include an appreciation for the visual stimulation provided by an attractive woman for the average hetero guy. A guy saying that he enjoys looking at boobs is not inherently demeaning and objectifying. Get over yourself.

                  • fizz says:

                    Yay for the middle ground :)

                    And of course, there’s appreciation and *appreciation* … one says “What an attractive woman” and the other says “I see only your visual qualities and not your discomfort or fear as I leer, gesture and catcall at you … but it’s okay, ‘cos I’m appreciating you … you know you want it baby”.

                    Maybe that’s part of Whatever’s perspective on the situation …

            • Big Daddy Ivan The Shortrightist says:

              Well, I have testicles, so the day I stop enjoying looking at boobies, the testicles will most likely be shriveled up like raisins, and I’ll be farting dust. Ok, even when I can’t DO something about it, I’ll still be enjoying looking at boobies. Just sayin’.

            • bodo says:

              Not exactly a regular, but may I sign up too please? Thanks. Wait, is this the sexist line? I thought I saw something about 8008135? Please?

  17. Cruiser says:

    This is not funny. 3,000 people were killed on 9-11 and 8 years later we are no closer to people knowing the true events that took place on that day.

    Anyone who laughs at the conspiracy theories obviously has never read on the subject themselves.

    Who doesn’t have 5 minutes to Google it?

    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

      Do you want to know what’s really not funny? Willful ignorance, hatemongering, and anti-Semitism — that’s what the 9/11 conspiracy theories are *really* about.

      You, the rest of the loonies, and the 20% of Democrats dumb enough to agree with you can FOAD.

      • The Steve says:

        “20% of Democrats dumb enough agree with you”

        So did you just pull that statistic out of your @ss?

        Liberal =/= conspiracy theorist lunatic fvckweasle.

        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

          Link, from a 2007 survey.

          My mistake — it’s actually 35% of Democrats, and only 22% of all voters.

          • Get over yourself! says:

            QQ

          • The Steve says:

            Believing the administration knew there was a threat of attack in advance =/= to beleiving that our own government orchestrated such attacks.

            If they didn’t know ANYTHING about a potential attack, then what the hell are we spending all this money on intelligence for? The CIA apparently sucks at what they do. (no surprise, they’re gov’t employees)

            Even IF they had intel to suggest an attack was planned, it doesn’t mean they could do anything about it. I don’t think they had any knowledge, because I don’t think anyone in our government is really that good at their jobs.

            I just don’t think it’s fair to apply the results of that survey in a manner that essentially labels 22% of all voters as conspiracy theorist nut-jobs.

            • Get over yourself! says:

              …and the survey says…. steve is whiny!!!

              • Cruiser says:

                Certain members of classified departments carried out the events of 9.11.01. This was not CIA, FBI, NSA, or others. These were people who do not fall under any acronym you would know.

                The former director of NASA is on the road as we speak presenting facts on why he and his team believe the buildings came down under a controlled demolition.

                Laugh if you will, but the truth is nothing to laugh about.

                • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                  First off, if you had a clue, you’d realize that the guy in charge of NASA is known as the Administrator, not the Director. (Again, I don’t expect perfection, but you should at least get the basics right.)

                  Now that we’ve cleared that up, tell me why Mr. Deets doesn’t appear on this list of NASA administrators, from Wikipedia.

                • mothergoose says:

                  I always love how it’s “Departments of unknown origin” or it’s “The illuminati” or the ever dreaded “THEY”…

                  How hard is it to understand… it was members of Al Qaeda acting out a plot hatched by KSM and Osama bin Ladin…

                  Oliver Stone didn’t make a documentary when he made JFK…

                  • The Steve says:

                    I agree, it was ALREADY A LEGIT CONSPIRACY!!

                    Why do the nuts have to make it a conspiracy that was made to look like conspiracy to cover a conspiracy?

                  • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                    you know what would be hilarious… if a government program used the acronym T.H.E.Y. and the members plotted horrific things and carried out the plans. then you’d be justified when you ranted online with the “THEY DID IT!”.

                    hmm, maybe all these nutjobs are on to something and there ALREADY IS a government program doing that exact thing!

                    *gasp*

                    the horror!

                  • justacanuck says:

                    Well, we Canadian conspiracy nuts know that it was all about Americans trying to trick us canucks……and…..manifest destiny….and stealing our beavers…and….

                    Anyone want a beer? It’s Canadian.

                • keithybabes says:

                  Was it MIB?

                • The Steve says:

                  Cruiser IS one of your 20% Dhoti.

                  Maybe my faith in people’s intelligence is unfounded.

                  My apologies.

                • I Like Peanut Butter says:

                  Last time I checked NASA dealt with Space. Even though planes were involved I didn’t see the hubble tele-scope, space shuttles, or even Houston involved in this one. So when a giant asteroid is hurtling towards the earth, I’ll ask NASA and Bruce Willis to save us all from the evil rock/ ice/ termite dusted area. :-)

                  • Captain Wow the Ambassador of Awesome says:

                    What about Clint Eastwood, James Garner, Donald Sutherland, and Tommy Lee Jones?
                    *facepalm*
                    I’m seriously ashamed of the fact that I could actually name every old dude in Space Cowboys.

            • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

              I’m not going quite that far — I did distinguish between the loonies and the morons who just fall for it — but it does suggest pretty widespread stupidity, or at least ignorance. At this point, without crackpottery, there’s no excuse for believing that Bush had advance warning of the attacks — the 9/11 Commission report is long, but it’s not a difficult read, and it’s not difficult to find.

              • Default User says:

                And on the off chance you do find the 9/11 commission report difficult to read, don’t worry, they made a comic book version.
                No, really. They did.

            • I’d be willing to believe that they knew something was coming, but didn’t take it seriously. Now, I don’t think the Bush administration had anything to do with 9/11, but I think they did exploit it for their own agenda.

  18. Cruiser says:

    Willful ignorance is the belief that truth comes from TV. How about you go Nuke Iran Dhoti and FOAD. Not really sure how anti-semitism got into the mix of things but OK?

    Learn to read you mind-controlled sheeple!

    Google “911 truth” and read, perhaps you might learn something that has meaning. Something you wont see on Good Morning America you dumb Fing yuppies.

    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

      First off, see that “Reply” button in the bottom right hand corner? Use it. (It won’t secretly report you to Dick Cheney and the Mossad, I promise.)

      As the first Troofer to use the word “sheeple” on the thread, you win the grand prize — a piece of tempered steel and a blowtorch. Put the two together and see what happens.

      • Cruiser says:

        They found termite dust in the remnants of the WTS towers… did you know that?

        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

          Why is that surprising? The place was filled with wooden furniture, wooden paneling, etc. — one would assume that some termites would eventually make their way in.

          And I assume you’re referring to the WTC towers, right? I don’t know where the WTS towers are.

        • Whatever says:

          Bah ha… termite dust? Are you kidding? Termites are evidence of a government conspiracy now? If that’s true, then my house was recently treated for government conspiracies, and we had to repair a little government conspiracy damage to the hardwood in the living room. I should call the government and demand restitution.

        • The Steve says:

          Gypsum wallboard (drywall) decomposes rapidly when heated. It gives off Sulfer Dioxide.

          Go look up the chemical reaction that occurs between Sulfer Dioxide and Iron.

          Then talk to a blacksmith and ask him about it.

          You don’t need magical thermite to bring down a building.

          • So, someone SLAMS a jet plane with tons of jet fuel on it into a huge building. The building burns for a while and collapses.
            And THAT’S their evidence that it was blown up from the inside???
            I love a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but this is too much for me.

            • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

              Clearly it was a supremely timed government plot involving everyone from the president on down working together in such a way as has never been seen in government before, and would make a Swiss watchmaker jealous.

              • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                the thing that gets me about this BS… the people who are bitching that 9-11 was a conspiracy usually are the same ones saying bush is dumber than my shoe.

                figure it out people!

                either he’s an evil mastermind who plotted an attack against his own country or he can’t spell his own name. he can’t be both!

                • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                  What if he’s Rainman????? *quirks eyebrow*

                  • HelOnWheels says:

                    They’re looking behind the wrong bush, so to speak (pun intended). Of course GWB didn’t plot against his own country. Karl Rove & Cheney planned the whole thing.

                    • Actually, Rove & Cheney might be demented enough to do something like that.

                      • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                        I think you’re giving both of those guys a little too much credit.

                        • HelOnWheels says:

                          If evidence ever surfaced pointing to that I can honestly say I would not be the least bit surprised.

                        • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                          I think that if there was evidence of the sort, the type of guys employed by both the Clintons and Obama would have found it. I’m not trying to throw up a partisan shield here, I’m being serious. The Clintons are the world’s best at ferreting out dirt on their opponents, and wouldn’t it have been a major campaign kudo had Hillary been able to whip that little nugget out for the American people to see?

                        • Well, I didn’t say they did it. I just said they’re sleazy enough to do it.

                        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                          Hel, I don’t get that attitude. If you really believe they were involved, why aren’t you doing anything about it? And if you don’t, why leave the nebulous door open?

                          I used to have a neighbor who was a full-on Troofer, as in he would stand outside the local Starbucks with his “9/11 Was an Inside Job” t-shirt to try to sway the sheeple. (Really, he was just divorced and horribly bitter and looking for an outlet for his hate, which seems pretty typical of Troofers.) I used to call him a coward whenever I caught him wearing that — as in “if you really believe that’s true, why aren’t you picking up an AK and fighting for your country?”

                        • HelOnWheels says:

                          I was speaking hypothetically, of course, and not trying to be partisan. Just saying that Cheney & Rove setting something like that up is not out of the realm of possibility, at least in my mind.

                        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                          Still — as much as I hate sleazeballs like Emanuel and Axelrod (probably about as much as the other site hates Cheney and Rove), I don’t seriously think that they’d commission the murder of literally thousands of people just for a political point.

                        • HelOnWheels says:

                          Dhoti, you need to relax and stop reading things I never wrote or implied. I do NOT believe that members of the U.S. government engineered the murder of thousands of their own citizens. However, my opinion as to the sliminess and evil of Cheney & Rove is such that IF there was EVER any evidence that they did such a horrible thing it would not surprise me. I was having a HYPOTHETICAL discussion with Froo.

                          Chill out, dude. You’ll live longer.

                        • I don’t think very highly of Darth Cheney or Rove at all. Do I think they’re disconnected enough to mastermind something like this for the sake of power? Yes. Do I think they did it? No.

                        • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

                          I don’t get the impression that Dhoti was being “uncool” on this one, Hel. I think he was just giving you his opinion of the facts, and his incredulity that people actually believe that someone like that is possible.

                          Meanwhile, I agree with him that I doubt that anyone is evil enough to do something like that for a political point……

                        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                          One person, maybe. (Say it turned out that Vince Foster was murdered by a Clintonista — I might not have been all that surprised, but I would have still been shocked, because that’s pretty far into “Murder at 1600″/”24″ territory.)

                          But 3000+? That’s Joker territory.

                        • HelOnWheels says:

                          “doubt that anyone is evil enough to do something like that for a political point”

                          And I would have to respectfully disagree with you on that point. We can agree on the fact that we disagree. :-)

                  • shortright the ivanist who thinks clothes are overrated says:

                    then he’d be stuck watching wopner all day or cheating in a casino rather than plotting the downfall of the US. ;)

                    • Counting cards isn’t cheating, it’s just not allowed.

                      • paws4thot says:

                        AIUI, after they discovered that people could do it, the casinos changed the rules of Blackjack to outlaw card counting. If it’s against the rules of the game, doing it is cheating.

                        Whether or not this says more about the casino owners than the few individuals who can do it is another matter.

    • Whatever says:

      Oh, sorry, I don’t know what you said, because I can’t read.

      I’ll just be over here with my Literature and Language degree, not buying into your bullcookies.

    • *something clicks*
      We are the mind-controlled sheeple.
      The government controls our minds.
      Join usssssss…join usssssss…

    • viking gal says:

      I read engineering analysis in ‘Science’ magazine, which I trust more than any fly-by-night website. That is not ‘willful ignorance’, it is educated choice of sources.
      As for ’sheeple’, I think this is the case of the pot calling the kettle black. STFUGTFOESADITOP(tm).

  19. Cruiser says:

    Thermite, I meant thermite jack ass, also WTC towers. You probably think that you are funny, when you are actually just an ass…. You are certainly not smarter than the former director of NASA.

    On October 21st at the University of San Diego, Mr. Dwain Deets, former Director of NASA Aerospace Projects, gave a multimedia presentation on behalf of nearly one thousand architects and engineers who cite evidence of explosive demolition in all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 and are calling for a new, independent investigation into their destruction. These architects and engineers are listed on their website at ae911Truth.org.

    • Whatever says:

      Okay A: Three?

      And B: Are you saying that the towers were laden with dynamite, and that the two big ol’ airplanes were just window dressing?

      • Cruiser says:

        “Whatever”, do you honestly think that you are smarter than thousands of engineers and architects?

        They have found thermite dust in the rubble, look it up. You all have the power of Google… use it.

        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

          There you go again…proof by ill-defined authority.

          Read this — I’ll be happy to explain anything you’re unclear about, or pass you off to someone who can — then tell me if it causes you to revisit your “theory”.

        • Whatever says:

          No, I do not, but I am smart enough not to assume that someone is a expert of any kind just because they say so on the internet. Anyone with a keyboard can type diatribe and quote a thousand engineers and architects that they completely made up.

          And also, I can tell the difference between two skyscrapers, and three.

        • keithybabes says:

          I wouldn’t trust an architect’s opinion on structural engineering issues. I only say that because I am one…

        • Like it’s real hard to dig up 1000’s of batshit lunatics. I’m sure we could find thousands more who would say, “Nope. It’s pretty simple. Plane flies into building. Building burns. Building collapses.”

      • Yes, Three says:

        …and if WTC 7 is new to you, I suggest you all start googling from there.
        That, in NYC, two planes hit two buildings, and resulted in the TOTAL collapse of three buildings, and that WTC 7’s fall is not mentioned at all in the “official” (c)omission report, should be enough to ring some bells that the accepted story is just wrong.

        • I Like Peanut Butter says:

          Yeah 2 110 story buildings collapsed spewing dust and debri everywhere, I’m sure there was no collateral damage to the building that was CLOSEST to the falling buildings. Especially since it was only half their size.

          • Whatever says:

            Oh, okay, so two were hit by planes, but the third was included in the government conspiracy. My bad. I guess the government thought three planes would be too conspicuous, so they sent the third plane to DC as a sort of obfuscation. I totally get it now!

            • I Like Peanut Butter says:

              What about the fourth plane in PA? OH wait they just used the brand new Stealth Crapper to crash that plane. All the people making phone calls to their loved ones were actors. I think they got Rober DiNero to make a few calls.

              • Default User says:

                No, no, no, the were to low on budget to afford the Stealth Crapper at this point. The just made up the fourth plane all together. All the family members claiming calls from loved ones were members of the conspiracy.

    • igloomccoy says:

      Please, please, PLEASE USE THE REPLY BUTTON

    • I Like Peanut Butter says:

      Reply button it is your friend. Of course you are a conspiratist so by jumbling your response with others you confuse the issue and make it easier to try and prove your point.

      Why is Mr. Sweet former, I’m thinking he got too dumb for the position. :-)

      • Cruiser says:

        On October 21st at the University of San Diego, Mr. Dwain Deets, former Director of NASA Aerospace Projects, gave a multimedia presentation on behalf of nearly one thousand architects and engineers who cite evidence of explosive demolition in all three World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11 and are calling for a new, independent investigation into their destruction. These architects and engineers are listed on their website at ae911Truth.org.

    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

      I don’t expect perfection, dear Cruiser, but when a supposed “expert” can’t be bothered to correctly identify even the most basic concepts, well, it doesn’t exactly fill me with confidence.

      And you’re absolutely right, I’m not smarter than the former director of NASA. (At least the one I’ve met personally; I’ll give the others the benefit of the doubt.) I am, however, smarter than many retired NASA engineers, of which Mr. Deets is one. To suggest that he was the “director of NASA” is laughable at best.

      But why do our relative intelligences even matter? I have yet to see you even attempt to make the beginnings of a logical argument — instead, you make whiny little insults and fall back on proof by authority (where “authority” is defined as “someone smarter than me who also agrees with me”).

    • Dwain Deets?!?!? LMAO!!

      I knew the guy from when I worked at NASA’s DFRC. He was a hell of an engineer, but seriously, he should have stuck with that.

  20. Gia says:

    -___- this was a photo taken in Allentown, where i live….

    I actually think i know that guy

    • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

      can you smack him for bitter troll?

      • Jay says:

        I dunno who he is, but I was thinking of running him over on my way to work, it would’ve been funny as hell.

        Yeah, good old Allentown.. I thought this looked familiar..

  21. n00bs says:

    Is Rosie O’Donnel visiting this site now?

    • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

      no this one is not about cheeseburgers, or cheesecake, or pie, or muffins, or cookies, or cake ooh she loves cake…and jelly beans!

      • n00bs says:

        Hmm, maybe she meant to be in the next about McDonalds but landed in here? She was pretty “big” into the 911 conspiracy theories.

        • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

          it was hamsandwiches that committed 9-11~!~~~~!!~~! they must all be destroyed…BY ROSIE!!!

  22. Mina says:

    LOL, Reminds me of some graffiti I saw on the interstate a few months back… “9/11 was an insid job” and yes, that’s EXACTLY how they spelled it! Now the city has put fresh cement on it to cover it up. It’s a comspiracy I tell you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!11!!!

  23. DogHouseTreat says:

    9.11 was an Inside Job!

  24. jameshogg says:

    I urge anyone believing in this conspiricy take a lot at what it REALLY means to be skeptical: looking at ALL the evidence, not just the evidence you require to fit your theories.

    Because being skeptical is about being ready to be wrong – and it takes a brave believer to question if he/she is wrong. If you believe the government set 9/11 up, you’ll have no problem giving better evidence than what you have.

    Trust me, I’ve been there and believed this conspiricy myself. Just please come to recognise that if governments can influence mass audiences and brainwash people, and if religion can influence mass audiences and brainwash people*… that maybe the makers of videos such as Loose Change can ALSO influence mass audiences and brainwash people – you in particular. Please understand – devoting your time to a lie is not worth it.

    * I hate the irony of the first Zeitgeist movie.

    • I also used to believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy. Part of me isn’t 100% convinced that SOMETHING wasn’t going on, but I think it was just turning a blind eye to something they didn’t think was actually gonna happen. Hell, they might have even heard the whole plot and thought it was bullshit. I mean, before 9/11 actually happened, would you have believed something like 9/11 would happen, and happen so effectively?
      But the fact of the matter is, there’s not any good proof whatsoever. And instead of dragging out a national tragedy for the sake of conspiracy, it’s best just to let it go. Because sometimes the truth is really just that simple.

      • froofrou: Now 5 times more accurate! says:

        I can’t even imagine the amount of intel that the White House has to slog through every day. Even if this was a serious threat before it happened, I wonder how many other just as serious threats went out that day and were prioritized along the same lines as this one? I doubt it was ignored so much as filed away along with all of the other whack job religious chatter that happens all the time.

        • DogHouseTreat says:

          I believe that 9/11/01 was a conspiracy and am 100% convinced that it was parts of our own government.

          Do I believe Bush himself had anything to do with it? No, Do I claim to know who did? No Do I ask myself questions and then answer it on forums? Yes

          • slaggingham says:

            They make meds for paranoid schizophrenia now.

            • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

              Nah, nothing so grandiose — like most Troofers, DHT here is just deeply bitter and hateful and managed to hook up with a group of like-minded hatemongers to wallow in it.

              Just look at how they start a conversation — every single one of them shows up, guns blazing, screaming about how stupid everyone else is.

          • So you don’t know who did it, but you think SOMEONE in our government did. And you came to that conclusion how exactly?

  25. Cruiser says:

    Keep on believing your television, all is good.

    All is well.

  26. alore says:

    911 – Loose Change

    just watch the movie

  27. Cruiser says:

    You can watch Loose Change 911 for free on YouTube, check it out!

  28. slaggingham says:

    Needs moar Van Jones.

    Also, needs less YouTube crackpots.

  29. DogHouseTreat says:

    Millions of barrels of crude oil exhausted EVERY DAY…..

    Yeah, that has absolutely no impact on our planet…..

  30. crickets says:

    they put it there to make sure only people dumb enough to believe their insane conspiracy theory check the website. it conserves bandwidth.

  31. gallegosaa says:

    It’s actually truth-v irus…

  32. Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

    It doesn’t look like anyone’s linked to this brilliant xkcd comic yet — pretty much sums the whole thing up.

  33. Travis says:

    I can’t believe the number of people that still believe that “terrorists” blew up the towers. I used to think that until I actually looked into it a little bit. There is a lot of solid evidence to prove otherwise.

  34. All Knowing Search Engine says:

    Has no one noticed the pink hair?

  35. sergei says:

    typical american full of retards

    • bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

      how many retards is he full of?

    • wicket says:

      typical non american retard full of …

    • Cowlifornia says:

      *slaps segei with firefox and adds to block list*

      but common, most of our retards are in polotics!

      I found the perfect example of polotics while playing Killing FLoor :P if you want your friend to join you, you need to kick someone. so you talk to the 4 people on teamspeak and they agree to kick someone. screw the other 2 guys, don’t need them :D

      • sergei says:

        wtf is segei ????!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!

        typical american full of fail

        • Default User says:

          Typical socks. *yawn*

          • Vila Restal says:

            Stuff who is who!! What the hell are Polotics??? Is that a Game on horseback played by people with a nervous twitch :-)

            • HelOnWheels says:

              Correct, Vila.

              Polotics = a physiological condition usually found in the economically higher tiers of society. Its symptoms include involuntary spasms and posh accents. Its main cause is the watching and participation in an equestrian mallet and ball sporting event.

    • dissimilitude says:

      Now that was bad porn…

  36. Cruiser says:

    Google 9/11 Truth. Read for 5 minutes. Pretend that you didn’t spend 8 years listening to bullshit on TV. Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation (a huge media conglomerate).

    Spend 3 minutes! 1 minute for each thousand Americans that died that day. Prove to yourself that you know what you are talking about.

    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

      You first — spend twelve minutes (that’s one minute for each SAS operative that planted explosives in WTC 7 — you knew that, right?) and corroborate the existence of nano-thermite.

      You *are* capable of backing yourself up, right? Go ahead. I dare you.

      • Cruiser says:

        I know that WTC7, a 52 floor building, fell at free-fall speed with small isolated pockets of fire. It was the 3rd office building in history that collapsed due to fire. The first two were WTC 1 and 2.

        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

          Knowledge can be supported and defended; faith can’t. You merely believe it, because you can’t support or defend it.

          (Also, they were more like the 17th through 20th. Wrong again.)

          • Cruiser says:

            What Dhoti? Did I put something in your coffee while you where in the bathroom? You’re talking gibberish.

            Firefighters on the scene, in WTC 7 reported small, controllable, isolated pockets of fire. There is still no official explanation for the collapse….

            Watch a video of WTC 7 free-falling in on itself…. doesn’t take ‘faith’ to see something wrong.

    • n00bs says:

      “Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corporation ” — so? What does that mean? I thought it was the US government that was behind 911 according to you. Now it’s a huge media conglomerate? Are they working with the US government?

  37. DogHouseTreat says:

    This is what I find on the site that you linked.

    “When did WTC 7 collapse?
    On Sept. 11, 2001, WTC 7 endured fires for almost seven hours, from the time of the collapse of the north WTC tower (WTC 1) at 10:28:22 a.m. until 5:20:52 p.m., when WTC 7 collapsed.”

    Once again, the first time in history large office buildings have collapsed in on themselves from fire.

    Not to mention, the site you linked ends in .gov……

    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

      So why do you trust that NASA engineer, my poly-cotton blend friend? Didn’t his email address end in .gov, too?

      Since you’re utterly unable to defend yourself logically, I’m forced to conclude that you’re motivated by blind faith. I’m glad we’re finally seeing eye to eye.

  38. Cruiser says:

    Eddie you are so funny! What are you 60 years old?

    Dhoti, there is nothing you can do to convince me the government had no part in 9/11 and there is nothing I can do to show you the opposite.

    Please use your gigantic brain, and all of your wisdom on something more useful than trolling blog comments. Perhaps you can find a cure for cancer, write the next greatest novel, find a solution for global climate change…. anything would be better than wasting your ginormous amount of intelligence on crackpots like me.

    Seriously, get a life.

  39. Thor, metal Floydist says:

    @DHT, Cruiser and all thermite people:

    You know that Thermite is simply Aluminum + Iron Oxide (rust+aluminum), right? I don’t see how *possibly rusty* support beams, combined with aircraft aluminum wouldn’t turn to thermite…

    To cook off, thermite requires a lot of heat, but Jet fuel has enough. If it didn’t, there are a lot of magnesium parts on the plane that could burn and act as a fuse (hint: you can light magnesuim castings in a bonfire. Wicked hard to put out).

  40. bitter troll the belgien flag!!!111!!!111!1!! says:

    bitter troll remember’s the early 90’s rap group “public enemy”….wonders if the CD “9-11 is a joke” can be considered offensive now

  41. TEH G4M3 says:

    THE GAME YOU JUST LOST IT !!

  42. orly says:

    Obviously, the author is an idiot who just bought his first computer and just learned about viruses. Good job, moron !

  43. Wichser says:

    cleary the belgians did it

  44. anton says:

    FAKE THIS SITE DOESN”T EXIST I CHECKED


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    shortright the ivani… on WOOPS
    Kn0wledge1ne on GOVERNATOR
    Lefty on GOVERNATOR
    Rando the Filthiest,… on GOVERNATOR
    Rando the Filthiest,… on WOOPS
    Igloo McCoy on TRAIN ORIGAMI
    Igloo McCoy on WOOPS
    pittypat on Let’s imagine the look o…
    dissimilitude on Let’s imagine the look o…
    CreyZee on LEVELS OF FAME
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz