'
Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

SCIENCE



large hadron collider

SCIENCE
If you don’t understand how it works, don’t talk to me about how it is going to destroy the world.

(Large Hadron Collider)

Are we dead yet?

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: thekadar81 via Poster Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

Yeah, but we're the cops...A for-profit insurance company has just denied a woman's medical claims after her husband beat her up because "domestic violence is a pre-existing condition.""Is That Your Age Or Your IQ?"Enter The Minds of Those Who Were There

» 399 comments

  1. VonWurzel says:

    You know, you could substitute “Science” with any number of words defining political ideology or beliefs and it would still fit . . .

    • Danbala says:

      Indeed! And a few other things like various media.

    • dhydar says:

      Hmm…. I’m guessing that this applies to Global Warming or Climate Change or whatever they’re calling it this week…

      • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

        No, because in that case the science is settled.

        SETTLED.

        • sisyphusredux says:

          Not.

          Nothing in science is EVER settled. Especially something with so many variables as the weather.

          • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

            Seriously, did you not see the Al Gore movie? With the smokestack and the hurricane on the poster? Settled.

            James Hansen also told me so.

            SETTLED.

            • alex says:

              If it’s on Wikipedia, it has to be true… and global warming is on Wikipedia.

              WIKISETTLED.

              • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                Burn.

                • Tacomagic says:

                  Nobody ever sees the Wikipedia closure coming. It’s like the Spanish Inquisition of locked in facts!

                  As a refresher for everyone this is the chain of science:

                  Hypothesis > Testable Theory > Experimentation > Revision > Peer Revision > Accepted Theory > Law > Wikipedia.

            • dhydar says:

              Well, anyone who can build a crane that would hoist Al Gore 15 feet MUST know science.

              • viking gal says:

                Or at least the branch of applied science called engineering!
                Actually, science has expanded and specialized so much in the past 30 years, that no one person can know all of ‘science’.
                —-
                Does anyone else remember a regular radio clip called ‘Ask Dr. Science’? Irritating guy, as I recall.

                • dissimilitude says:

                  “He knows MORE than you do!” Yes. Kinda funny, if I recall.

                  • Vila Restal says:

                    And I remember “Ask Dr Ruth”. What happened to the old Dwarf Doctor??

                    • viking gal says:

                      She’s still around. I think she has a website now, and I recall reading that she gave a public talk in Boston this past summer. Not much can keep her down!

                      • Vila Restal says:

                        I just read her entry on Wikipedia. She was a SNIPER in the Israeli Army. (Then again she was that small she probably couldn’t have been seen :-) ) You just couldn’t make that sort of stuff up could you :-)

      • John says:

        Climate change.
        So many idiots were thinking that global warming meant everywhere just got warmer and whats wrong with that? that they use climate change to help reinforce the idea that some places, such as the UK could actually get a lot colder and wetter.

        • paws4thot says:

          When are you going to take action on the real causes of Climate Change, you know things like continental drift and global vulcanism?

          • keithybabes says:

            That’s illogical, Captain.. :twisted:

          • Atalanta says:

            Chem 102 from first year: they’ve plotted atmospheric CO2 levels they’ve measured, then compared them to production by natural causes and human causes. Neither of the natural nor human plots explains the trend, but put them together (with more weight on the human aspects), and the trends match. So yes, natural flux does have an effect, but not *nearly* the same as what we’re doing.

            Humans are the cause of *excessive* global warming. No doubt about it.

            • Beege says:

              How much more weight was put onto human causes? Your comment provides no scale on how big a problem we are.

              • viking gal says:

                I found a Norwegian research article which only traces the amount of Carbon 14 (radioactive form created in the atmosphere) since 1960. The percentage spiked in the 1960s (due to bomb testing), and has declined ever since. However, we all know that the overall carbon concentration in the atmosphere has increased over this same time. So that means that the increase in carbon in the atmosphere has to be coming from non-atmospheric sources (living organisms would have the carbon-14 including variety, since we all breath–and eat carbon-fixing plants). The only non-atmospheric sources would be geologic emissions (like volcanoes) and the burning of fossil fuels.

    • Aaaaargh says:

      Political ideology: yes. Beliefs: no. Science is different from beliefs in that it is (relatively) clear how it works and in that it can be explained. “Beliefs” are just a feeling that is really vague to anyone who doesn’t share it.

      • Danbala says:

        Still, not understanding beliefs (or possibly not understanding humans?) leads to doomsday ideas on what this or that religion will mean for the world.

        • Aaaaargh says:

          No trouble with that if it’s based on arguments. Only the fact that you shouldn’t judge beliefs if you don’t understand them is nonsense, because the problem is that people can’t explain it. Because an explanation isn’t possible as it is a feeling, or something like that. Not judging science if you don’t understand it is more realistic in that way. If you interpret it wrong, it’s your own problem as it’s really clear and only one way to interpret it. (well, not the bit of science where there’s discussion about practical effects but then there’s at least discussion with solid, clear arguments)

          • Danbala says:

            Essentially I agree with you. I guess I’ve just come across one too many people with a strong conviction that Islam will destroy the world and letting muslim immigrants into the country is DOOM. :p

            • defaultscreenname says:

              Don’t be daft. Islam won’t destroy the world. That’s soooo 2005.
              Mayans are the new threat to humanity!

              • Vila Restal says:

                Actually nothing will happen in 2012. It’s merely the similar sort of predictions that the Aztecs had every 52 years when they carried out their “New Fire Ceremony” (Look it up on the Interweb) and they thought that if it wasn’t carried out then the world would destroy itself. Well everyone is still here. Same thing with the Mayan Calendar. It’s reaching the end of their age so everyone thinks that “Oooh. This means the end of the world”, when all it means is that one year will close on 31st December 2012 and a new one will begin on 1st January. Just like every other year.

        • dhydar says:

          The real problem here is that it’s fairly common for people to claim that their *beliefs* are “science”. Heck, even that their *desires* are “science”.

  2. Schmoe says:

    I’ve been expecting you, Mr. Bond.

    • bond the Zappaist says:

      Do you expect me to talk

      • Cougar Whacker says:

        No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die.

        • not quite the real Bond the Zappaist says:

          OK…um…look…that thing is really hot and it’s getting reeeeally close to my junk soooo…maybe we can, like, discuss stuff, OK???

          • Default User says:

            Oh! You want to talk! *sits down with coffee mugs and begins speaking at an incredibly high speed* SOhowhaveyoubeen? I’lltellyouhowI’vebeen. Justawful. Thanksgivingisanightmare,themotherinlawdoesn’tlikemycooking, theniecesandnephewsarerunningamuk. Theturkeyisn’tdefrosting, thecranberrysauceisasolidlump, thecathasgonemissing, I’msoooonotpreparedforblackfridayshopping…
            *goes on like this for several hours* Sooo…What do you think?

        • xy says:

          (smirk) I think waiting for a micro-black hole to develop so it would suck Bond in bit by bit until his eyeballs exploded would be *really* dull to watch (until, obviously, the eyeball exploding bit – that would be fun!)

  3. ay dios mio EWAdams no es gracioso says:

    People think it’s going to destroy the world?

    • “ZOMG IT IS MAKING THE BLACK HOOOOLLLLES AND WE ARE ALL GOING TO GET SUCKED IN AND THE EARTH WILL BE DESTROOOOYED1!!11!!!elebenty”

      Something like that. ;-)

      • keithybabes says:

        Well, they’ve spent so much money on it, we should expect no less. I mean bashing a few subatomic particles to bits just seems a bit lame…

      • Scythelord says:

        You do know it’s not baseless claims by idiots saying such things, but rather scientists stating there is a possibility of bad outcomes.

        • keithybabes says:

          Er, not really. Rather the opposite in my reading of it.

        • ms says:

          Scientists wondered about it, but they also realized that a portion of cosmic rays that strike the upper atmosphere have even more energy than the LHC can pack into a collision. Since these cosmic rays are a regular event, we know either 1) the black holes do not happen, or 2) they happen all the time without hurting anything.

          That’s a little different from the claims of the tin-foil-hat crowd who claim that the LHC is going to kill us all. If you understand what you are talking about, you don’t make claims from just half of the available data.

          • MRob says:

            Oooh, very nice argument, I like.

            Course its a real life example that supersedes the previously advanced theoretical possibilities, so the people who initially said it might destroy the world are not complete idiots (just a little narrow in their thinking). And then the concept was of course attention grabbing, so you can understand how it was trolled by all the main stream media outlets.

            The above “lol” is really just a statement of snotty nosed superiority over the less well read masses, who found the idea intriguing and amusing. So smile, dont glare or patronise when people suggest it.

            • alex says:

              Even the theoretical physics aspect of it though never really supported a conclusion that the Earth could end for 2 reasons:
              - Black holes of the magnitude you would expect to be created on the subatomic level in the LHC would decompose in nanoseconds from radiated energy (yes, black holes radiate… Reference Stephen Hawkings’ work).
              - Black holes can’t really be “created”, nor do they “suck things in”. A black hole can have no more mass than what it started with… so essentially any black hole created would potentially sink to the centre of the Earth, but everything else would just keep rotating around it unchanged.

              • alex says:

                Clarify: A black hole created in the LHC would only have a mass equal to that of the particles which were used (and consumed) to make it. You can’t create a bigger black hole (mass wise) than the mass you start with.

                • Dhoti says:

                  Sure you can — if the black hole captures more matter than it’s radiating, it’ll gain mass.

                  • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                    Mmmmm I would concede a point to you Dhoti; but the statement “you cannot create a bigger black hole than the mass you start with” is still correct – if it sucks in more stuff, then it’s using its own energy to expand. Grow. Whatever. It started out one size and then due to its nature expanded. Not the same thing.

                    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                      See below: alex was saying that, because the black hole has the same mass as whatever collapsed to form it, it can’t suck anything in. (I think that’s what he/she meant by “nor do they ‘suck things in’”, anyway.) That’s not, I think, true in the general case.

                  • alex says:

                    Right, except that the black hole will still only exert the same gravity on the matter around it that was already being exerted (since no new mass was created, gravity hasn’t changed). It just means you end up with the Earth continuing to rotate around a nano-scale black hole sitting at the centre of mass of the planet.
                    Except, of course, that the black hole wouldn’t survive long enough for that to occur.

                    • Default User says:

                      I wish it had happened. That would be awesome to have a innocuous black hole sitting in earths core. I know it wouldn’t do anything and I would never be able to see it, but it would still be neat :D

                      • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                        The Terrafirmians might be able to send you a picture.

                        • Default User says:

                          No, they stopped responding to my e-mails when they found all the surveillance cameras I’d put up in their bedrooms. Also..there’s the restraining order that won’t let me under the earths crust anymore.

                        • HelOnWheels says:

                          Got any more of those cameras? I’m falling behind on my stalking of Diss and I’m sure that she misses that creepy “I always fell like somebody’s watching me” feeling. I wouldn’t want to disappoint her.

                        • defaultscreenname says:

                          No. They kept them all after the court settlement. Stupid Terrafirmians. Now all i can afford are a few strategically placed mirrors.

                    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                      Yes, but now it’s *only* exerting the gravitational force (ignoring Hawking radiation for a moment). Doesn’t that mean that a nearby particle, previously in equilibrium due to one of the other forces, could be drawn in?

                      I don’t think the creation of a black hole is necessarily an external non-event, if I’m reading you right; you seem to be saying that only matter that was originally bound for whatever used to be there will fall into the black hole, which I don’t think is correct.

                      Regardless, given the size and lifespan of microscopic black holes, I don’t think it’s likely to absorb even a single stray particle in any case.

                      • alex says:

                        Well, yes and no. It will be exerting gravity still, but also will be exerting some pressure due to radiation. A black hole is just a mass so large that it has a radial limit (the event horizon) where even a photon of light can’t escape it’s gravity.
                        I think I’m making this more convoluted than it needs to be, I’ll say it this way instead:
                        Current theory holds that there’s a super-massive black hole at the centre of our (and most other) galaxies. There are several stars that have been observed revolving around this object. They’re not falling into it, they’re just revolving around it the same they would anything else of a similar mass.

                        If the Earth was a static system only held together by gravity counteracted by internal pressure, than perhaps it could collapse in? However, the Earth, in reality is a more complex system than that, for starters, is revolving around it’s centre of mass.

                  • keithybabes says:

                    Create: vt : to cause to come into existence. Keep up.

                    • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                      Now do you see why I yank your chain? Your little reactions are just hysterical! LOL!

                      Begone, adults are speaking.

                      • viking gal says:

                        Where? I only see PKers! :P

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Dhobi, did you READ what alex wrote? Your response indicates not. Admit it. Be a man.

                        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                          Did you UNDERSTAND what alex wrote? Or what I wrote? Given that you were doing research in *the dictionary*, probably not. (While you’re there, look up “context”. It’s a noun.)

                          Normally, I get a chuckle out of playing uptight pricks like yourself, but I’m starting to feel bad; I get the sense that you may in fact be mildly mentally disabled.

                        • keithybabes says:

                          You still haven’t admitted it. But I’m glad you’re beginning to realize that I’m only MILDLY mentally disabled. When you realize what an a$$hat you are you will be making further progress.

                        • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                          I’ll assume, by your continued and pointless responses, that you have absolutely no frickin’ idea what the original conversation is about. (Or prove me wrong — explain alex and my points. Go ahead. I dare you.)

                          When you have to resort to mimicry — and really, that’s the best you can do? — it’s just, well, sad. (Not that I’m not laughing at you, retard or not. You’re such an amusing little puppet.)

                        • pittypat says:

                          If time kermits, I think you should punch him, Judy.

                        • Brak the Zappaist says:

                          Boy Howdy-that’s what he should Doody, all right!

                        • keithybabes says:

                          @Dhobi, I take it a BJ is out of the question then?

                        • pittypat says:

                          Blue Blue windows behind Oscar
                          Elmo moon on the rise
                          Big Bird flying across the sky …

                        • keithybabes says:

                          Actually I’d better explain it. In cake language. I imagine you like cake, Dhoti? Basically what alex was saying was that you can’t create a cake that weighs more than the ingredients that you put into it. Then up pops Dhoti and says ‘You can if I come and sit on it’. Too late Dhoti, the cake is created, and 200 lb of sh!t and sawdust is not going to improve it.
                          Anyway I think you have done something positive in one of your earlier comments. You said ‘ leaving aside Hawking radiation for a moment…’. I think that has a chance of becoming a new meme. It might need some alteration along the lines of ‘leaving aside Dhoti’s theory of cake improvement for a moment…’. Basically it’s in reply to every self-important cut-and-paste artist who wants the world to imagine he knows more than he does about any particular subject. It certainly cracked me up. But then I’m easily amused.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          Because you don’t understand, of course, nobody else does, either. Typical.

                          Still, I’m amused beyond words that you actually think you’re funny, and that any of this is making you look good. Not to mention that, for multiple days now, you’ve had nothing better to do than let me lead you around like a puppet.

                        • Brak the Zappaist says:

                          Oh my god…this is too funny. Dhoti sez..”Nobody understands me!!” Can I get a WWWAAAHHHHH!!!

                        • Dhoti says:

                          Stick to the rhyming nests, brak — your reading comprehension skills are failing you.

                        • Default User says:

                          See?! See!? Brak’s right! No one understands you!

        • There was an “educated” thought that the initial nuclear explosion would start a chain reaction that would consume all matter until it ran out.

          • keithybabes says:

            I did read about why it couldn’t happen. Something about event horizons; kind of made sense at the time…. *brain explodes*

            • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

              Actually, no, nothing like that at all. Wow.

                • Dhoti the anti EWAdamsist says:

                  I can just imagine all the brow furrowing and head scratching that went into that one. Zing!

                  • You know, being an arrogant ass just for the sake of it make you, well, an ass.

                  • keithybabes says:

                    Well now, since I’m such a retard, suppose you explain (in short words obviously) why a black hole will not consume the universe, without using the words ‘event horizon’? Suppose you contribute something either funny, or intelligent, or relevant, or educational, rather than just twattish? Marks will be given.

                    • keithybabes says:

                      Or fVck off, either is fine.

                    • Dhoti says:

                      How is it my problem that you can’t keep up? Lashing out at me may make you feel better, but it’s not productive.

                      Since you are, as you say, a retard, I have to point out that the answer you’re looking for now (“why aren’t black holes slowly consuming the universe?”) is different from what you were discussing before (“why won’t the initial ‘nuclear explosion’ result in a universe-consuming chain reaction?”). If you don’t understand the question, there’s no point in providing an answer.

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Let me see.. no marks for funny. One for intelligent, none for educational, none for relevance and minus one for twattish. That leaves you with zero. Keep up the good work, Dhotage.

                        • Dhoti says:

                          It’s like you’re a stereotypical villager in an old monster movie — the moment you see something your superstitious peasant brain can’t comprehend, out come the torch and pitchfork.

                          Again, your smooth cortex is not my problem.

                        • keithybabes says:

                          You started with the torch and pitchfork, Dhonki.
                          Anyway, I can’t sit around gabbing, I have to go and hide. I think I can hear Russian tanks coming down the street.

                        • PortlandMark says:

                          (This is like watching the Palin/Reagan/Bush/Batsh!t crazy wing of the republican party feuding with the George Will wing. Love it love it love it!)

                          Someone pass me the popcorn?

                        • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                          *passes PM the popcorn*

                          You should hang out more.

                        • PortlandMark says:

                          Well, if I knew the entertainment was like this, I’d have been here more already! (nom nom nom)

                          My mouth sure is dry all of a sudden. Anyone want a Winter Hook Christmas Ale from Red Hook?

                        • defaultscreenname says:

                          No thanks, I’ve got some hard cider on tap. I’m good. Though if anyone wants some margaritas I recommend you get one before Rando gets here and drinks them all.

                        • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                          Oooh! I would! Thanks.

                        • wicket_arse says:

                          PK is fun!!! bravo for the laughs and giggles while reading this thread.

                        • (Damn these margaritas are good.)
                          Wait…what?

                    • Nebton says:

                      Well, I realize this will probably fall on deaf ears, but the reason that a black hole won’t consume the universe is because the universe is expanding. Eventually this is predicted to result in the “cold death” of the universe, but our little science experiment will have practically zero impact on that. (“Practically” because it does contribute to the net increase in entropy, but then again, so do your comments on this thread, so way to go in contributing to the end of the universe!)

                      • viking gal says:

                        *applauds*
                        Science AND a sense of humor. My kind of guy/gal! (Nebton being one of those gender-neutral handles)

                      • keithybabes says:

                        Well, you know here at the PK laboratory it’s usually very quiet, which white coated scientists calmly analysing lols and writing short reports, sometimes with a little gentle humour thrown in. And polite, in the way that laboratories often are. But every so often all hell breaks loose and the place is like a monkey house. Lols get mixed up, reputations are dismantled, name calling is indulged in.. it’s not good for science but maybe a little for humour.

                      • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

                        In the end, only entropy can triumph.

  4. keithybabes says:

    I was having great difficulty destroying the World until I discovered science. MWAHAHAHAHA!

  5. angie says:

    this is the thing that everyone was sceared of when was going to be turned on, then it didnt work, now every has forgotten about it, daft planet we live on.

    • HelOnWheels says:

      Actually, people have not forgotten about it. It’s been the subject of a lot of new quantum physics theories. It’s very interesting. Look up the Higgs Boson particle and how it has theoretically created events in the future that have impacted the past. Super cool stuff.

  6. Oh noes says:

    If this machine never works properly, then the only black hole created will be in the pockets of the people who funded it.

    • The Steve says:

      Hot Pockets?

    • HelOnWheels says:

      And you can’t exactly use it a found-art installation if it doesn’t work.

    • Seabee says:

      Oh noes, I think I hate you.
      I get to the end of the line with a comment about black holes and bank accounts, and there you are again, stealing my thunder!
      I want my thunder, dammit!

      *throws tantrum*
      *900 miles away LHC is hit by tantrum shockwave*
      SNAP!
      *another $10 000 000 bill for repairs!*

    • Kn0wledge1ne says:

      What the hell are you talking about? It DOES work…

      • I heard it melted a candy bar in some guy’s pocket.

        • wicket says:

          i think that was at the Willy Wonka factory, not the LHC.

          • Psssst, that’s how microwave ovens were invented, while doing experiments on early Radar.

            • HelOnWheels says:

              Really? Now THAT’S cool. I love this place. I learn something new every day.

              • The experiment in the beginning was an attempt to make a death ray, as in kill people with energy, experiments. While testing, an airplane flew in the path, and it showed up on a scope that was taking measurements. 2+2=4, they then knew they could find airplanes with it, but that it would take too much power to kill people with it.
                And later, while learning how to make radar work, experimenting with a thing called a magnetron, they melted the candy bar while testing it. After the war, he did experiments again, and developed the first oven.

                • viking gal says:

                  You sir, have won 3.2 gold-plated internets for that history lesson. Full of geeky WIN!

                • wicket says:

                  Not so surprising. A lot of great inventions come from the bi-products of military research initiatives to kill people. That seems so counter intuitive to me. But i’m not complaining as I’m about to go heat up a hot pocket in my microwave while I use the internet to play video games and talk to my friend on my cell phone.

                • Vila Restal says:

                  Actually as far as I heard the story it goes – When doing experiments on Radar a scientist (based in Britain) found that there were dead birds round the base of the Radar dishes. After inspections they discovered that the birds were actually cooked from the inside. After the war it was discovered that the cause of the deaths were actually down to the part that emitted the radar signals. This was eventually built into the first Microwave.

                  • paws4thot says:

                    JAC is correct as far as the original idea behind the “Chain Home” Radio Direction Finding, German “Giant Wurzburg” and similar systems were correct.

                    The modern microwave oven is also a development of the cavity microtron, which was developed for the Aliies short-wave (10cm or less) radar systems (2-stage Merlin Mosquito nightfighters, Lightning M, P-61 Black Widow, H2-S terrain radar), whilst the Germans were still using 33cm or so, hence the arrays of huge dipole antennae on their night fighters.

  7. 'Nuther Guest says:

    Let’s see, what has ‘science’ given us…hmm. Medical advances. Quality of life. Better food. The atomic bomb. Chemical warfare. Yup, all of those are totally benign, in no way capable of destroying the world. Whew. I feel so much better now.

    • dhydar says:

      History of Science, summarized :

      (1) C’mon – what could *possibly* go wrong?

      (2) Well… how were *we* supposed to know *that* would happen?

      • viking gal says:

        Along with spilling tea on the cell culture plate, and deciding to run the experiment anyway…resulting in a major discovery! (happened to a jerk of a teacher that I had once. honest!)

    • keithybabes says:

      GM = Day of the Triffids.

    • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

      Don’t forget LSD!

  8. Hailey says:

    I’m guessing it’s really going to start putting interesting things out right around Dec. 21, 2012.

  9. InsertCleverName says:

    Smah those particals, baby! Boom Bah!

  10. alaaii says:

    omg, really good caption
    physicist here ;D

  11. That’s definitely gonna destroy the world. I mean look at it. It’s all wacky and sciencey and stuff.

  12. Atalanta says:

    Hate to harp on this… but this is *exactly* why people need to stop freaking out and listen to their doctors when it comes to H1N1 and the vaccine. It’s safe, effective, and the same composition as every seasonal vaccine. If you don’t understand what Freund’s Complete Adjuvant is, you should read some more immunology textbooks. Or listen to the people that actually did. Bah.

    – Atalanta
    Frazzled microbiology major

    • viking gal says:

      :)
      *have a cookie*
      –understanding biology prof.

    • wicket says:

      as long as we have a microbiologist here, can i ask you something? When I walk into a public restroom and smell someone else’s poop-mosphere, am I actually inhaling tiny airborne particles of their poop?

      • keithybabes says:

        Yeah. Carbon Dibackside. Is it a wave or a particle? I’ve often wondered that!

      • viking gal says:

        My non-microbiology understanding of the ‘aroma’ is that it is from the hydrogen sulfide, indole and skatole gases which the bacteria made, while digesting gut contents for their own use. But if you are close enough in time and location to the flushing at the production site, I suppose it could be possible? Since we usually have stall walls and doors in the way, I wouldn’t think it was a huge risk, however… But I would like to hear from Atalanta also! –assuming she didn’t dive back into his/her studying?

        • keithybabes says:

          The Victorians thought that the smell was the disease-carrier rather than just a symptom of nearby disease-carrying stuff. A lot of folk resisted having wcs inside the house for that reason.

          • viking gal says:

            Outdoor priveys. Now THERE is a smell. *gags discretely*

            • keithybabes says:

              Yup. My grandma had one. For those caught short on winter nights there was also the chamber pot under the bed. Oh the times we had…

              • Default User says:

                Because the chamber pot in the bedroom would be so much safer than the WC in it’s own room. Victorian logic fail! :P

                • viking gal says:

                  Well the chamber pot usually did live in its own cabinet (called a commode), for what that is worth. I actually found one in an antique store–the backplates for the handles are engraved with pots with a flower and butterfly–as if that would make them smell better!

        • Default User says:

          Interestingly enough, there’s been a number of studies on whether or not the flushing toilet puts poo particles on your toothbrush. Some studies say yes others say no. I would call the results inconclusive at this point.

        • Atalanta says:

          Wow – leave a conversation for couple of hours, people start pulling out pitchforks and making poop jokes… XD

          Yeah, I’m with viking gal on this one – it’s certainly possible. But honestly, the adverse effects are probably immeasurable. Give your immune system some credit – it’s worked through parasites, viruses, bacteria, splinters, rusty nails… I think it can handle a little fecal matter. And besdies, what’s the worst thing that could be in it? Maybe a colonization of normal E. coli that you already have in your natural flora? Or a random virus you’ve probably come across before and your memory T cells will have a field day with?

          Nah. On the off chance it did happen – your immune system would have it licked, no problem. /bows

          /takes cookie – OM NOM NOM

          – Atalanta

          P.S. – (Consider this the first time being a micro major has ever been so popular. :D )

  13. Atalanta says:

    Hate to harp on this… but this is *exactly* why people need to stop freaking out and listen to their doctors when it comes to H1N1 and the vaccine. It’s safe. It’s effective. It’s the same composition as the regular seasonal vaccine.

    Basically, if you don’t know what hemagglutinin and neuraminidase are, you should read some immunology textbooks. Or listen to the people that actually did. /facepalm

    – Atalanta
    Frazzled microbiology major

  14. Jenna says:

    Thank you! I just wrote an 8 page research paper on the LHC and I am so happy someone agrees with me. It might help people if they actually READ credible information too. Dumbasses.

  15. Necron says:

    There is lots of credible information from physicist on both sides. They say worst case scenario is that it has a 1 in 50,000,000 chance to create a black hole big enough to destroy the world… That odds you are willing to bet on? O.o

    • wicket says:

      crazy how the numbers ended up on such an even number. almost seems like it was made up, instead of actually calculated.

      • ay dios mio EWAdams no es gracioso says:

        well it’s a 50/50 shot it ends up even. Just like it is for ending up odd.

      • gmc360 says:

        It probably is calculated, but it gets rounded to nearest order of magnitude when published.JJust like when someone says something will cost a trillion dollars, it is not a trillion on the money – hey that was an unintentional pun, extra points?

    • bitter charro Supreme Internet Dicktator says:

      Only if it comes with a winning lotto ticket.

    • xy says:

      If someone told me that they would fire a gun at my head, and that it had a 1 in 50 mil chance of killing me, but that if it didn’t kill me, I wouldn’t gain anything real from it happening, I think I’d have to decline…

  16. Dexaan says:

    They’re waiting for you, Gordon… in the TEST chamber.

  17. Maxwell Supreme Socialist Presidictator of PK says:

    You know what will destroy you? Bill Nye….
    Billy Nye will end your asswith science!

  18. Cowlifornia says:

    AAAH! the octopus is coming for meeeeeeee!

  19. GetMeOttaTexas says:

    I have a black hole in my desk drawer. It eats my pens. Earth is safe as long as I keep buying pens. I am really hoping for a good xmas present for this sacrifice although I may consider letting the *alleged* History Channel have access. They could get a whole weeks’ worth of their new style crackpot theory “history made everyday” by us type programming out of it…

  20. Xenon says:

    Particle physics gives me a hadron. :P

  21. Dark Pascual says:

    Hey, if that thing destroys the world by 2012, I win pizza and a soda…

  22. jameshogg says:

    Best thing to do is look at evidence – because no matter what you believe, it will not make that evidence any more or less true.

    That’s why you can be pretty certain that scientists know what they are doing with this machine. Unlike unquestioning believers who always insist they are right all the time, scientists actually try to prove their own theories WRONG, and therefore make much more progress than any irrational believer ever will.

    So no need to worry. Same thing with 2012 (I wonder what date the religions will pick for the next end-of-the-world hype?).

  23. bitter troll says:

    bitter troll does not believe in science…its made up fantasy bitter troll tells you!

  24. D-Day says:

    OMG THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  25. DW says:

    Well, that puts the kibosh on the Global Warming debate.

  26. Lllll. says:

    …if you understand how it works then why do you need it?…

    • Default User says:

      Well you se- Wait. What? Do you know how your liver works? Doesn’t matter if you do or not really, you still need it. Or maybe your car? Might not need it to live, but I doubt you’d give it up. Understanding how something works doesn’t mean you don’t need it.

      • talus says:

        Problem is we DON’T NEED a large hadron colider
        It is a huge ass multi million dollar paper maiche volcano
        currently it doesn’t have any practical applications
        also ther amount of power needed to run it for about twenty minutes could run chicago for like a week.

        • keithybabes says:

          I reckon it’s worth a few bob to help unravel the mystery of the universe.

        • paws4thot says:

          How do you know we don’t need the LHC? Suppose that it leads to the breakthrough in atomic physics that makes room temperature fusion on the “Back to the Future” scale (reactor small enough to run your car on) possible? Won’t that solve a lot of problems with fossil fuels and CO2 emissions?

        • Philip says:

          And we don’t need to know how to efficiently stack spheres in 23 dimensions.
          Oh wait, we use that to make the internet more efficient.

          And we don’t need to know how to make numbers which don’t exist (i).
          Oh wait, they’re fundamental to modern physics and computer technology.

          Just because you don’t know the purpose or don’t directly see it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t have one.

    • Lllll. says:

      …so, this comment produced a collection of typists who have acknowledged individually they do not know how it will work…only that they will probably need some results/insights from a difficult machine…for some to supplement their livers…which filter toxins from the body and other tasks…which should be failing any second now…and they will have to wait in ques for a replacement…

  27. Edwin says:

    Replace ‘science’ with autism, vaccinations or both, replace the picture with Jenny McCarthy, Jim Carrey, J.B. Handley and Andrew J. Wakefield and we’re all set


Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    viking gal on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Liberty on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Thatgamerguy on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    SemperGunny on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    The Amazing Rando on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    Kn0wledge1ne: King o… on Gates Angry! Gates Smash!
    dan_144 on Gotcha
    The Amazing Rando on Which One Has The Vodka?
    SemperGunny on Interrupting Kanye: I’m …
    The Amazing Rando on Captionable Photo of the Day: …
  • Hall Of Fame


    Classic Political LOLs!

    Hall of Fame


  • Tag Cloud

  • See Random Political LOLs

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog