Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

Stop picking on her!



ann coulter

Stop picking on her!
Life for transexuals is hard enough as it is.

(Ann Coulter)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: Cleopatra_Bones via Advanced Lol Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 642 comments

  1. whirlabou says:

    She actually looks like an elk, without the antlers.

  2. mothergoose says:

    I like the LOL asking why the cross she’s wearing isn’t burning into her chest.

    • raptorkeeper says:

      I asked the same question many times before. She scares me.

      • mothergoose says:

        I don’t think she scares me as much as the people who blindly hang on her every word… THEY scare me.

        • Ivan The Floydist says:

          Although Maddow is not quite as nuts. I love her show, I just don’t rely on it for my “world view”.

          • mothergoose says:

            Agreed. I like Rachel. She has been fair to Conservatives who choose to appear on her show, and hasn’t let her ego get in the way (yet).

            Agree totally with Rando the Floydist’s statement… every pundit has their neuroses. (i’m hoping that’s the plural for neurosis)…

          • Rando the Floydist says:

            Oh yeah, I like Rachel. She’s a good sane balance to Olbermann’s over the top style.

          • corndog says:

            I don’t believe that I’ve ever seen a clip from Maddow’s show that carried any kind of information or argument that was of interest; it’s possible that the people that follower her are picking Reall Lame Clips to post on youtube, though.

            What has she ever said that was of interest?

            • Rando the Floydist says:

              Well, that’s kind of the thing. She doesn’t say anything outrageous really, so she doesn’t end up being mocked as often as other pundits. That’s why she’s the level-headed one countering Olbermann’s antics.

              • dhydar says:

                Hmm… the problem, though, is that she says nothing interesting or vaguely enlightening, either.

                I suppose vacuous is better than vicious, but I avoid both.

                • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                  It’s more that she’s into posting the facts… she like’s blowing the lid off of “scandals” or lies using actual factual (heehee that rhymes…) information. She then ties it all together using logic…
                  But I guess if you don’t cal that interesting or enlightening and would rather refer to it as vacuous… well then… I think that kind of speaks for itself.

                  • The Amazing Rando says:

                    But she doesn’t scream and incite hatred and chaos! What kind of pundit is THAT??

                    • No1askedme says:

                      I know right!? What kind of pundit uses FACTS?!

                    • Sheesh says:

                      One that outsells her books over any liberal writer? Or are you jealous of her success?

                    • Ivan The Floydist says:

                      Look Rando! It’s the other half of The Fu(kweasel Twins! Hi Fu(kweasel!! *waves*

                      Anyway, we were talking about Rachel Maddow in this particular thread, not Ann “The Devil” Coulter. Reading Fail.

                      Fu(kweasel.

                    • The Amazing Rando says:

                      I’m not jealous of her success, fvckweasel, I’m appalled by it. If I had only known one just has to rant excessively and controversially on topics to become famous, I’d have been all over that 10 years ago.

                    • bad fairie says:

                      so sheesh, if she’s such a success as an author, why do i find her books on the shelf at the dollar store?

        • corndog says:

          Heh … no more so than people who blindly attack her appearance because they were told that she is their enemy…

          • Rando the Floydist says:

            If we can attack her appearance, how can we be blind? And we weren’t told she was the enemy. We KNOW she’s the enemy.

          • Ivan The Floydist says:

            What, you mean like that fella up there attacked Rachel Maddows’ appearance? Hypocrite much?

            • Rando the Floydist says:

              Yeah, they really need to coordinate their trolling a bit better. Contradictions abound.

              • Justacarolinan says:

                Now you know BT is the only troll with any ACTUAL intelligence.

                • Rando the Floydist says:

                  That’s true. I guess I’m expecting too much out of them.

                • No1askedme says:

                  Yeah, it would seem many trolls have been mistaking insanity, walls of text, name calling, and ALL CAPS for intelligence lately. It’s sad to see the decline in troll quality, because that doesn’t mean anything good for anyone. :(

                  • HelOnWheels says:

                    “It’s sad to see the decline in troll quality”

                    What do attribute that to? Maybe we should consider importing our trolls from some place with a proven troll quality record.

                    • No1askedme says:

                      Hmmmm, I propose an international troll exchange program.

                      • randman83 says:

                        Well, troll economists have agreed that for troll quality to increase, the trolls must first experience a troll recession. This would be caused by high quality lols that they have no clue how to troll properly.

                        However, if we do import, we need to consider how an influx of foreign trolls will affect our lols, because if we have a bunch of lols about uninteresting foreign politicians, we won’t have a lot to bash the trolls about.

                        Troll markets are hard to predict.

                        • lowly grunt says:

                          “This would be caused by high quality lols….”"

                          Well, then I guess we are stuck with our quotidian bunch. Drat.

                        • viking gal says:

                          I wish to award one internet, bronzed, economics division, to randman83.
                          *bows*

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                          Randyman! (I found you a nickname) I do hereby concur with VG on her awarding you a bronzed internet, and present you with this, certificate of PK regular authenticity!

                        • randman83 says:

                          Happy day, oh, happy day! I accept this reward and all responsibility attached with it. I will do my utmost to further enforce the inferiority complex present in the collective minds of the PK troll population (BT exempt), and will continue regular, objective reports on various lols and wharblgarbl warblgarbl rabblewarblgarbl…
                          *gets yanked off stage amidst airborne tomatoes*

                        • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

                          And I now invite you to ceremonial after party at my Fortress of Doom!
                          Eddie! Bring the tequila!
                          Rando! Bring the music!
                          BT Bring the…. something that wont run people off!

                        • YAY! Congrats on the award.. don’t assume however that you have lawn privileges, ok?

                          It’s earned, not given.

                        • *lugs in two cases of Waco Cabo Wabo..*

                          drink up, me hearties! Aaaaaaarrrrr

                        • The Amazing Rando says:

                          Let’s see, I have Pink Floyd and the Beatles and…that’s about it. So we’re set!

                        • charro says:

                          YAAAAAAAAAAR! *double fists tequila shots*

                        • randman83 says:

                          Someone needs to bring Primus
                          *rumages through music files*
                          Nothing better than some random vocals and epic lead bass.

                        • Ivan The Floydist says:

                          You do NOT pre-empt Pink Floyd & The Beatles with Primus! That can get your membership revoked, bucko!

                        • viking gal says:

                          Primus makes my ears bleed. How about some DMB instead?

                        • The Amazing Rando says:

                          …oh thank God charro said tequila shots…

                        • randman83 says:

                          Hey, I just said their bassist was epic (and their vocals are random). Anyone who disagrees needs to go interweb Les Claypool. However, Pink Floyd still owns.

                • charro says:

                  I love my bitter troll.

        • katdemon♥fire says:

          Thank you.

    • paws4thot says:

      Because she’s not a vampire? I know nothing about her, but I thought holy symbols only burnt vampires!

  3. ninke says:

    not bad actually… Though I’ve never heard of her… Wonder what she sounds like though XD

  4. thebabbster says:

    Have a go at that Adam’s Apple!

  5. aurora says:

    You are all so funny -.-
    Idiots

  6. flmom says:

    Actually she resembles an afghan hound (with apologies to afghan hound owners)

  7. samiam says:

    don’t insult trannys by saying ann coulter is one of them, ann coulter is worse

    • arimareiji says:

      I’m not sure “worse” applies to their respective medical conditions… one has reversed genitalia, one has reversed GI tract orifices.

  8. pbean says:

    It’s interesting ALL comments actually ignore the caption and make jokes about the person portrayed in the picture.

  9. Nailin Palin says:

    Great LOL! This is now one of my favorites.

    But shouldn’t there be another, of Rush Limbaugh, to balance it out? The caption would be: “Stop picking on him! Life for drug addicted, racist pedophiles is hard enough as it is.”

  10. Rando the Floydist says:

    *snort* Heh…uh, I mean, hey, that’s mean! *snicker*
    (Today’s forecast, mostly cloudy with a 150% chances of trolls bitching about this.)

  11. Rae says:

    If that Adam’s Apple were any bigger it would need its own zip code.

  12. AC says:

    So glad I only hear about Coulter through PK…

  13. Nick says:

    All of you liberals out there need to read her stuff with an open mind. You might actually see that her stuff makes sense.

  14. NJ says:

    I think her eyes are off a bit

  15. arimareiji says:

    Maybe she meant she wants him in her mouth, and she’ll light him up?

  16. dontyouknow says:

    Leave it to the “progressives” of this country to decry anyone opposed to “alternative lifestyles”, then immidiately turn around and use those “lifestyles” as insults.

  17. Ivan The Floydist says:

    You forgot one:

    Call observer a party-line totin’ conservatroll – CORRECT

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      observer has gotta protect his/her boyfriend up there.

    • Justacarolinan says:

      As opposed to a party-line-totin’ libratroll? Both sides have them, and they usually aren’t totin the party line, but rather one or two extreme agendas. Except for the ebil juice sold weapons to everyone then started the war trolls. They are just scary, period.

      • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

        Yes, but in this thread… EVERYONE’S a libratroll… even you yourself have indulged. If anyone comes onto this site expecting us to play nice with the resident Pundit “bully” then you’re sorely mistaken.

      • charro says:

        Jeesh, why you gotta pick on the Libras? Geminis are much worse, if you ask me. :-P

  18. David J says:

    I’d do her…and I hate her! What does that tell you?

  19. Ivan The Floydist says:

    I just thought of something almost…unspeakable. Imagine a new Fox News show. An hour long show with Ann Coulter and Michelle Bachmann. Just chatting and giving their opinions.

    I…I may never sleep again.

  20. cgray says:

    Ann Coulter’s politics are mainstream conservative. She just uses the acerbic attacks to draw attention and make money. All you liberals saying you hate her are falling for her scam. You’re just wasting emotional energy. Like when people pay attention to Madonna.

  21. Sara says:

    Call ann coulter an evil lying anti-human piece of crap = insult to crap.

  22. Schmoe says:

    Wrong-she’s just wrong. Her personality would make a necrophiliac gag.

  23. Justacarolinan says:

    I don’t care who you are, that LOL is funny. I bet even Ann laughs at it.

  24. tim says:

    i know coulter’s an absolute joke and all, but why do you have to go make fun do transexuals like that?

  25. The ads are regional.. I’m seeing ads for someone selling t-shirts.

  26. Sud_Vicious says:

    Why doesn’t someone ask David Brock?

  27. Anony----- says:

    What is this woman about?!

  28. dieOFaids says:

    Above comment proves my point. Since it’s safe to say you’ve never read a single word she’s written, what exactly does she “lie” about?

    Oh that’s right, liberals just rely on other liberals to tell them what people say. Did you hear, Sarah Palin said you can see Russia from her house…..

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      I can understand having differing viewpoints, but this blatant hatred of all liberals is kinda disturbing.

      • viking gal says:

        I suspect dOa is about 13, either physically or mentally. And doesn’t deserve anyone’s attention, except perhaps that of the truant officer.

        • Rando the Floydist says:

          This proves that some parents are awful at indoctrinating their children with their hatred. Sad really. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to direct my children’s Pledge to Emperor Obama. I’ll be back later.

          • Prepositionmann Goebbels says:

            Neh, it proves that some parents are awful and are really good at indoctrinating their children with their hatred. Two different critters. (^_^)

    • Wait…since the comment above yours is…YOUR comment…you’ve proved your own point? How very circular of you.

      As a conservative woman myself, I find Coulter’s over-the-top vitriol embarrassing and histrionic. So fu(k off.

    • Sara says:

      Well it is safe to say that you are an idiot, I have read her crap. It was long ago and I choose not to retain or relive the memory. I do recall seeing her on TV spouting garbage about some 9/11 widows. And WHO told you that nonsense about liberals telling liberals…blah blah, rush or ann??
      Hopefully your name speaks of YOUR future, dork.

  29. Rando the Floydist says:

    Ms. Coulter, we would like to ask that you refrain from commenting on this website. And anyone who picks a name like “dieOFaids” shouldn’t talk about other people’s hatred.
    Admins? A little help here? We’ve voted this one off the island already.

    • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

      Didn’t even need a tribal council for that asshat.

    • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

      Also… why am I reminded of a scene from a terrible movie called Robo-Wars… in which a certain character actually uses the insult “I bet they got AIDS”…
      Keep in mind this insult sprang from the mind of a guy who directed some classics as “Porno Holocaust” and “SS Death Love Camp”

  30. bitter troll says:

    thats not a woman…thats a space station…

  31. Sara says:

    This post is a perfect example of ann the mann followers. Hey di(kwad you have absolutely no idea of whay anyone looks like who post here yet you call posters “fat” and “ugly”. Your credibility is now negative 1.
    And as for how much money she has, well as long as there are dumba$$es like you around buying her crap…..

    • bitter troll says:

      Rosie O’Donald has more money then bitter troll ever will..does that mean she is right?

      no.

      so cash in pocket means nothing.

      Micheal jackson made lots of money, bitter troll dont think bitter troll would take his advice..cause he’s dead…and that would be creepy

  32. Jysella says:

    Life for transsexuals is hard enough as it is.

    You could at least refrain from making it harder by telling transphobic jokes.

  33. maevele says:

    she may be a venomous twit, but it’s effed up to insult her by implying she is trans, because duh, there is nothing wrong with being trans. insult her for being a demon, but if you can’t find something better than ‘hurdur, she looks like a mayuuunn’ to insult her, you kinda suck.

  34. penguin_man says:

    Who is this?

  35. steroid says:

    Yeah, just like you should stop picking on Nancy Pelosi, because it’s hard enough being retarded.

    Or on Ted Kennedy, because it’s hard enough being a fat jerk who drank himself into the grave.

    Or on Obama, because it’s hard enough being a socialist in the real world.

    • Rando the Floydist says:

      Jackass troll is a jackass.
      As for “socialist,” you neocons keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      • steroid says:

        Please, enlighten me. What is socialist?

        • No1askedme says:

          Someone who puts the good of the people before the good of the government.

          • steroid says:

            Ah, but what is the good of the people? I believe the good is to give people choice, which means, among other things, the right to keep their money, dispense their property as they wish, and collude to get more property. I believe that the good is justice, not prosperity.

            Is this socialist?

            • No1askedme says:

              It’s true that the modern Democrat party embraces some socialistic policies, but they’re hardly socialists. Look up the Democrats’ ideologies during the 1920’s, that’s when they were truly socialists. As for people keeping their money, that’s what his tax changes did, taxed the wealthy (who can afford it, and many don’t deserve the money they have) more in order to reduce the tax burden on members of the middle and lower income brackets. I consider that fair. As for reducing peoples’ ability to make a range of choices, where are you getting that?

              • steroid says:

                The wealthy should have choices–including those afforded by money–as well as the non-wealthy.

                “As for reducing peoples’ ability to make a range of choices, where are you getting that?”

                Under Obamacare, I cannot choose to spend my money on an XBox instead of an insurance plan.

                Under cap-and-trade, I cannot take the property my business is on and run the business the way I want it to be run.

                Under equal-opportunity/affirmative action, I cannot hire who I judge is the best person to fill my needs in disposing of my property, but must consider the hiree’s welfare.

                The freedom to choose includes the freedom to make choices that are unpalatable, anti-social, and even false-to-fact. Those are the choices that Obama and the Democrats want to curtail.

                • No1askedme says:

                  I agree with you on affirmative action, but that’s been around for decades, and I haven’t heard anything about Obama expanding it. “Obamacare” would simply be an available plan, you would still have access to corporate plans, and I don’t think it could possibly cost private individuals more that $20 or so a year; much of the burden would be on corporations. I’ve read about this “cap-and-trade” thing, but I still don’t really understand what it is, doesn’t it have something to do with emission standards or something? To me, Obama’s policies aren’t about trying to prevent people from making poor decisions (nice observation btw, I never thought of that and it kinda reminded me of 1984), they’re more about making sure individuals are held accountable for their actions, although you’d never know it from the bailouts…

    • No1askedme says:

      Calm the fvck down man! We insulted one person who deserves it, and you insulted one person who deserves it (Pelosi) and two who don’t. I guess I can’t blame you though; it’s hard being a neo-con when no one but other neo-cons likes you…

      • steroid says:

        I don’t particularly care if you like me. (BTW I’m not neo-con, I’m radical libertarian–basically Ron Paul plus I favored the Iraq war) I do care if you advocate government policies that curtail my freedom.

        And I care if you take what are nominally non-ideological web sites and assume that the centrist, inclusionist, egalitarian view is de rigueur, and that anyone who espouses a different view is a troll. Slap a big, “Modern Liberal Pundit Kitchen” banner on the top and you won’t have problems with folks like me. But that means admitting that you have a political position, and do not automatically possess the right answer.

        • No1askedme says:

          Very true, but Obama isn’t a socialist, that’s more of what I was getting at. Sorry for assuming you were a neo-con, but you were behaving the same way and I haven’t seen you post here much before. I still don’t fully understand why you would support the Iraq war, would you mind explaining? I have friends who are libertarians, and they were all opposed to the war.

          • Shaq says:

            Why does everyone say Obama isn’t a socialist? He’s all about redistribution of wealth, isn’t that part of socialism? He even said it in an interview before he was elected.

            • Charlie Foxtrot (Floyd Extrodinaire) says:

              Hey — give me all the wealth, doesn’t that make me a capitalist?

            • No1askedme says:

              Redistributing the wealth in a fashion that gives everyone the same amount of money is communism, socialism is putting citizens before the government. Obama’s “redistribution’ plan simply raises taxes on the wealthy (who can afford to “donate” more to the government) and reduces the tax burden on everyone else. Bush reduced taxes on the corporations and wealthy and raised taxes on the poor and middle class, whom his deregulation policies destroyed financially. Which would you rather have?

              • Shaq says:

                So, from your description, Obama IS a socialist. I thought you said he was not…

                • No1askedme says:

                  No, my point is he’s not “redistributing the wealth” like all the pundits are saying, he’s making taxes fair again after Mr. Bush fvcked them up. If anyone redistributed wealth, it was Bush and the republicans.

                  • Shaq says:

                    Ok, we will see… I don’t believe raising taxes on anyone is good for the economy, even the wealthy.

                    • No1askedme says:

                      Then you should have hated and protested Bush more than Obama, because Bush raised taxes way more to fund his little war. Besides, we need tax money to pay off all our debt accrued during that war. The money isn’t gonna magically appear on its own…

                      • Shaq says:

                        No, he didn’t raise taxes, he cut taxes, that’s why we have a huge national debt. He didn’t do things right either.

                        • No1askedme says:

                          Look it up, he only cut taxes for the rich an big businesses. It was part of his “trickle down economics” scheme which failed miserably and landed us in a recession. When the war started he funded it partially by raising taxes on the middle class and poor.

                  • No1askedme says:

                    P.S. Why did you choose the name “Shaq” of all things?

  36. steroid says:

    I’m keen to get rigorous definitions here. Somewhere between Communism and Socialism and Laissez-faire lies Obama (and LBJ and FDR). We need a word for it so those of us who don’t believe in it can be accurate and honest.

    I supported the Iraq war for the same reason I oppose Obama’s domestic agenda: because I believe that maximum freedom is best. I saw a major threat to the freedom of the individual from radical Islam. Not merely the threat to life from terrorist attacks, but the necessary resources spent on confronting the threat. I was upset when newspapers and magazines refused to publish the Danish cartoons. I was irked when a supermarket cashier refused to move a pack of bacon over the scanner, and was not immediately and unceremoniously fired. I was ticked when cab drivers refused to carry passengers with (closed) containers of liquor and were not demonized in the press as taking their religion too far. The nations whose populations mostly adhere to Islam needed to be sent the clear message that they did not hold the political advantage, that they could not use the threat of terrorism to win concessions, even merely symbolic ones.

    In short, I favored the Iraq war because it offered those nations a simple choice: radical Islam, political and economic strength, not getting invaded–pick any two.

    • steroid says:

      Oops, that was a reply, of course.

    • No1askedme says:

      Ah, I see your point with the war now, but Iraq had no hand in any terrorist attacks for decades. I don’t think what we did in Iraq was wrong, it was how we were fooled into it, lies and hate propaganda, that I was against; but I see your point. However your comment here doesn’t have anything to do with Obama… You’ve clearly thought this out, but that wasn’t clear from the way you posted up above. I suggest you try to be more clear as to your message when posting in the future.

      • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

        I like how the guy talking about not having his freedoms restricted wants cab drivers to be “demonized” for “taking their religion too far”
        Way to support double standards Steroids!

        • No1askedme says:

          Meh, he’s entitled to his views, and you don’t know what he’s experienced; lay off of him a bit. At least he was willing to give me a straight answer to the questions I asked him unlike most people I ask. He’s not even a neo-con, so chill out.

          • Maxwell Silverhammer says:

            Sorry, but I call em like I see em. You can’t be all about your own personal freedoms when you want to infringe on other people’s, it doesn’t work that way.

            • No1askedme says:

              I think he was calling people out on their own double standards, refusing to act where action was needed and ignoring their surroundings for their own gain. You’ve gotta admit, some of the stuff he described is pretty effed up.

    • The Amazing Rando says:

      “I supported the Iraq war for the same reason I oppose Obama’s domestic agenda: because I believe that maximum freedom is best.”

      Be careful. There’s a difference between freedom and anarchy. There is such a thing as too much freedom.

  37. She is a very intelligent & gorgeous woman… Nowadays in the internet only 14 years old school girls are considered attractive.

    • No1askedme says:

      Beauty is in they eye of the beholder I guess, but to me she looks like skeletor… As for intelligent… I don’t think so, she’s just sensationalistic. She’s a pundit for goodness sake! Pundits are paid NOT to think for themselves!

    • I respectfully disagree..

      1) Ann Coulter does nothing for me, and apparently for a whole slew of other people.
      2) Kindly cite where she is even remotely intelligent.
      3) 14 year old girls do nothing for me. Further, it could be miscontrued if that is what your desire is (unless you happen to be 15.)

  38. arimareiji says:

    Am I the only one who’s getting some effed-up format of centered comments with numbers to indicate nesting levels?

  39. Charlie Foxtrot (Floyd Extrodinaire) says:

    Are you really that stupid or do you practice in front of a mirror?

  40. Julie says:

    Well said! (S)he’s such a hateful witch!

  41. RoyBatty says:

    It’s called an Adam’s apple and the chicks I date don’t have one…

    BTW – if you Google “Adam’s apple” the very first image returned is Coulter’s. Just saying….

  42. Okay, this was mildly clever enough to surprise me and get a laugh.

  43. Squirrely__Kitteh says:

    I think that is really mean

  44. Begoniac says:

    I notice that Coulter dragged her larynx and her bony frame to Fox News yesterday and claimed that “liberal agitators” were behind all the posters of Obama as Hitler.

    Yeah, I have little elves churning them out in my basement as fast as they can. Can’t keep up with the demand!

  45. Winyan Staz Wakien says:

    Please stop calling him a she. It takes more than a fake boob job and a little black dress to make a real woman.

  46. D says:

    Hmm, just 10, nay 9 more comments and there will be 666 comments to this.

  47. Pirate77 says:

    Okay… let’s say it’s true, she’s a man. Then she’s more man than the Barack!

  48. Roxie Moora says:

    Agreed – could not have said it better myself.

    Ann Coulter pisses me off just as much as the next liberal nutter, but calling her a transsexual is an insult to the trans community. We can’t all be cisgender perfect.

  49. F. Danconia says:

    Say what you want, this woman is hot in so many ways!!

  50. DR says:

    Okay, no one make one more comment on this article. We’re at 666 comments. Everything’s perfect. :D


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    keithybabes on you got
    NeilH on MRE
    Churj on you got
    fdoomz on you got
    Danbala on you got
    The Amazing Rando on you got
    The Amazing Rando on And then the nasty ol…
    The Amazing Rando on And then the nasty ol…
    Lilly on you got
    The Amazing Rando on RAINBOWS
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz