Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

DR. KING



martin luther king jr.

DR. KING
He didn’t lead a major civil rights struggle and get assassinated for you to walk around with your pants around your knees.

(Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.)

Picture by: dunno source Caption by: raymaty via Poster Builder

» Recaption This!

» View All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 339 comments

  1. FamilySly says:

    Meh, not funny.

  2. Igor The Vigorous says:

    Are they implying that all blacks walk around with their pants around their knees?
    Oh well. MLK would probably disappointed with us for various reasons anyway- one of them, probably, the way I’ve seen people acting towards Mexican people just for their nation of origin…

    • FaileV says:

      i didn’t see it as implying that all do, just that some do, and that few effects the many. only as strong as the weakest link kinda thing, but i can also see how easily it can be generalized to all so…yeah all in all not that good.

    • Sud_Vicious says:

      I think the statement is directed specifically at those who do walk around with their pants around their knees.

      “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.”

      I think the statement impinges on their character more than their color.

    • gniknihtdrawkcab says:

      This is a very odd statement: “the way I’ve seen people acting towards Mexican people just for their nation of origin…” I don’t think Americans have a problem with Mexicans. What we do have a problem with is illegal immigrants, no matter what nationality. It just so happens that they’re the majority of that category. If someone wants to become an American citizen, that’s fine, but do it the right way. Embrace the American ways, history, and, yes, learn English. Even though we don’t have a document stating that English is our national language, when 99% of the people speak it, it’s pretty much the national language. Also, if you’re an American, don’t fly your old country’s flag. That’s not being an American. That’s trying to be some other nationality living off of the American people. If you’re so proud of that country, go back to it. Otherwise, be proud of this country if you want to come here.

      • Danbala says:

        So you advocate assimilation rather than integration?

        • gniknihtdrawkcab says:

          To a point, yes. I know that people will always keep a part of their old country, and that’s fine. However, if you’re an American, you should not be flying your old country’s flag. Show some pride. You are no longer of that nationality. I know that if you came here legally, you went through a lot. There must have been a reason. If you came here illegally, you probably went through a lot more. However, the first thing you did was break the law. I’m sorry, but that’s not right. You are not welcome if you do not respect our laws…

          • Danbala says:

            Right. Illegal immigraition is a different animal than immigration, I think. But why would flying your old country’s flag be wrong – and in what way is that not showing pride?

          • gniknihtdrawkcab says:

            What do you mean, you think. There’s a huge difference between coming here legally and breaking our laws. I don’t even know why that’s up for debate.

            Because you do not belong to that country anymore. You are an American. No longer German, Austrian, Mexican, etc. If you are an American, and proud to be an American, you should fly the flag if you’re going to fly one. How is it showing pride to be an American by flying another nation’s flag?

            • Danbala says:

              “What do you mean, you think.”
              I used the “I think” of the “in my opinion”-type.

              “There’s a huge difference between coming here legally and breaking our laws. I don’t even know why that’s up for debate.”

              I only mentioned it because you talked about it so much in your post that I responded to – just to note that I had read it, but that it felt irrelevant for the assimilation/integration topic.

              Thanks for answering my question. I guess I am unable to understand how your past can no longer be a part of you whether you are an American or not, nor why pride, or what sort of pride, should restrict you to only one flag. It is nowhere within my ability to grasp that reasoning, I suspect. Sorry to have wasted your time on that topic. :p

            • Danbala says:

              Oh, I changed my mind – I did have another thought/question/reaction to what you’ve written after all! :)

              “How is it showing pride to be an American by flying another nation’s flag?”

              Couldn’t it be a way of both showing pride of “your old country” while also displaying a pride or joy and appreciation for living in a country where it’s actually legal to use another flag than that of the nation?

              The aspects that I feel pride in and really appreciate of my country is that sort of freedom – that we can function and thrive no matter what flags are on the poles of the lawns across the nation.

              I should add that I believe less and less in the concept of nation states with every year that passes, so that “pride” is a bit more complicated than that. ;p

            • Bee says:

              Oh please! Spare me your nationalistic crap.
              As the saying goes: “You can take an X out of Y, but you can’t take Y out of an X.” Being naturalized doesn’t mean you suddenly don’t have a heritage anymore.

            • gniknihtdrawkcab says:

              I guess my thinking is just wrong. I mean, if I hated America so much that I moved to France, I don’t think I’d be flying the American flag. If I left America because I was being persecuted or held back for whatever reason and I could move to another country and be welcomed and make something of my life, I would respect that country and be proud of it. I just don’t think I’d try to change it to be more like the country I left. And, I would try to actually fit in and be a part of that country, not try to remind everyone that I’m not really one of them.

              I love how everyone wants to be treated the same and you leftists like to tell us that we shouldn’t see people for anything but their character, but you’re the first to throw ethnicity in our faces. What I’m getting at is that if you want to be an American, then great, learn our laws, our language, etc., and be an American. Don’t come here, tell us you just want to fit in, and then do everything you can to prove that you’re not one of us.

              • valdis says:

                “I guess my thinking is just wrong. I mean, if I hated America so much that I moved to France, I don’t think I’d be flying the American flag.”

                Ahem. My grandfather didn’t leave Latvia because he hated it, he left because the Soviets were about to either shoot him or load him on a cattle car to Siberia, for the crime of being a Boy Scout leader.

                Deal with it.

                • Pencilsharpener says:

                  Yes, the oppression people face that leads them to America is not always because of a failing of the nation itself. However, I agree with gniknihtdrawkcab’s overall sentiments. Everyone should probably assimilate if they freely move here, and by that, I pretty much mean learn English so that you will have a voice.
                  The Native Americans should have been allowed to integrate, however…

            • Cathy says:

              to gniknihtdrawkcab – So to think of it, it most likely REALLY pisses you off seeing other countries flags around America? That just makes you a douche, plain and simple

          • Jessi says:

            So the fact that someone is now an American means they can no longer have a past or a love for their country of origin? My grandmother happily came to this country and was full of pride in being an American, but she still proudly represented her South Korean heritage and had a Korean flag which she flew. Lower than the American flag, of course, but she still flew it.

            America is supposed to be a melting pot. A place where people of other cultures come and can not only be free, but still maintain their identity.

            By the way, I’m a Texan – should we not be able to fly our flag there? We were, after all, our own country once.

          • Mel says:

            I’m sorry but becoming American doesn’t mean you should try to ‘wipe out’ your roots, which is how that’s coming out. Why not respect who you are, where you came from and what you went through to come to the States? What makes our country so great that we shouldn’t wave flags of our old country in respect to them? And what about all those people trying to escape oppression or starvation or whatnot? Wouldn’t you break the law to find yourself – or your kids – something to eat?
            This country was founded on the idea that we could take anything we wanted and make it ours. I don’t think we should continue that sense of ignorance by saying it’s ‘a lack of pride’ to not wave the US flag. A lot of immigrants who appreciate being here DO wave the flag, but there’s no way in hell they don’t care about who they are, which can be partially defined by where they’re from, and to show pride they’ll wave that flag. The transition from one place to another isn’t that absolute.

      • peanut_butter says:

        I’ll second that… when my ancestors came to this
        country it was because they wanted to be American

        If you’re so proud to be mexican, go back to mexico
        I’m sure you won’t last long.

        • Igor the Vigorous says:

          When and where did your ancestors immigrate from, exactly?
          Because it’s not like we see the remnants of the European culture in Boston, etc. or anything. Yeah, other cultures are UNACCEPTABLE, right?

      • Squiggly says:

        I think(and someone please correct me if I’m wrong here) that he was talking about some people who just assume that because someone is Hispanic or just looks Hispanic that they are in this country illegally. I have seen people taunting Mexicans telling them to “go back where they can from” or that they “didn’t need they kind here.” It’s unfortunate we still have people who act this way and it’s quite despicable for someone to assume that just because you look a certain way, you aren’t a legal citizen.

        • Igor the Vigorous says:

          That’s exactly what I meant, Squiggly. If the intent behind my words was a nail, you just punched me in the face. Or maybe you punched me in the brain.

          • Squiggly says:

            Oh I’m happy I understood what you were saying properly. Sometimes I may misread or misunderstand and I do hope to be corrected if that should happen.

            Er, sorry about the brain punch?

      • Igor the Vigorous says:

        Gniknihtdrawkcab, I was referring to the way I’ve heard people in my town talk about or interact with people who appear to be “Mexican”, or have a Central American accent.
        I knew a girl last year who was a real b*tch and hardly did her work, but we were friends, and I read her paper that said we needed to stop all Mexican immigrants because she (and apparently, a lot of the people she knew) believed they were dirty, violent people who weren’t as good as the people already in the country. It’s funny, because she’s the violent drug addict…. Project much?
        Anyway- I don’t know why some of the people I’ve met feel compelled to treat Mexicans like they’re “less” than they are- don’t they realize it’s just another form of discrimination?

        • FaileV says:

          But if they don’t make themselves out to be better for arbitrary reasons like their skin color or country of origin then they would have to actually accomplish something meaningful in order to gain power and respect. That is far too much work, discrimination is easier

    • Sgt Dill says:

      Woah . . . moron.

  3. ay dios mio says:

    Has anyone else seen that episode of The Boondocks where MLK woke up from a coma to see what society has become. This made me think of that, and I wanted to discuss.

  4. lowly grunt says:

    I lol’d!

  5. Murray says:

    Actually, he did do all that for blacks to wear pants below their asses. It’s called freedom of expression. It’s also stupid and their are expressing their idiocy, but it’s allowable.

  6. S.A.R. member says:

    this is the truest, most honest news pic Ive seen lately. I think Dr. king would be b****slapping Kanye, Snoop and the Williams sisters if he was alive today. His achievments and meaning were taken WAAAYY out of context by the ilk of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton(add them to the b****slap list.) No racism here. just honest, God-given truth.

  7. Veg says:

    Wow, what a lame caption.

  8. Care Troll says:

    What’s really funny is that most people don’t realize that wearing your pants hanging around your butt like that was a prison symbol. It’s basically saying that your butt is claimed territory and if anyone tries anything they will have to answer to who ever claimed you. I can’t help but laugh at people who think wearing the equal of a gay jail wedding ring is fashion.

    • MaMaQ of Philadelphia says:

      Honey – now THAT’s an interesting point.
      I know a few teachers in the area & I might have to recommend they drop this interesting information to some of the kids swaggering into their razor-wired school yards.

      Of course, you never know. They may just be exhibiting their career goals… ?

      What’s funny to me is that around here it’s the harmless kids who wear their pants the lowest. It’s just fashion.

      The young men I worry about most are the spotters/dealers who look like they could take me out, jump a fence and disappear… They don’t wear no muffins, chains, or anything you could point out in a line-up.
      *harumphs, shivers & considers reconnecting w/ neighborhood watch*

      • Allie says:

        If you haven’t heard of snopes.com please go there and search for sagging pants. I would paste what they say here but you can’t copy their text. To summarize:

        Yes, it started in prisons.

        No, it has nothing to do with gay signs; it happened because of ill fitting clothes and no belts.

        The theory about it being a gay sign was started as a method to disdain the people dressing like that.

        Personally, I think it is stupid and ugly but super funny. Funny, because someone with saggy pants has to limp while holding up their pants. If they let go the pants fall.

        • Care Troll says:

          So you think it’s stupid and ugly yet you help dispel the rumor started to end it?
          and yeah I didn’t know it was fake until I checked snopes. oh well.

  9. juan says:

    Why does everyone cry racism when a constructive criticism is made?

    The image doesn’t say all african americans behave in this manner. It is simply a criticism of those who don’t appreciate the sacrifice and struggle that was require to provide the opportunities that many are squandering today. Typically those who wear their pants around their knees are not taking advantage of the opportunities available to them.

    • parksj1 says:

      I haven’t cried racism, but I do think that if Dr. King were alive today, he would have bigger things to worry about than fashion. There might be some kind of correlation between taking advantage of opportunities and how you wear your pants, but I think it might be a difficult one to prove.

      • lowly grunt says:

        I don’t really think it’s just fashion; fashion can be very political and I think the lol maker is suggesting that the politics of this particular fashion is whack.

        I didn’t know that about prison wear. Interesting bit of information that I will store and use when I can.

    • charro says:

      RACISM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    • Cathy says:

      to juan – EXCUSE ME!!!How on earth can you say that?? I’m afraid you’re not even realising that your words are spelling r-a-c-i-s-m! You’re saying that blacks aren’t appreciating the opportunities and freedom they have been given? But don’t ALL races deserve the equal amount of freedom and opportunities? How on earth can you sit there and say like the big Slavemaster himself that “You, n*gger, have not appreciated the freedom I gave you, so I shall enslave you again”
      Like there aren’t as many whites acting and dressing ghetto as blacks? But you don’t say to white people that they should appreciate their freedom because they’ve always had it! Damn…I hope you get my point

  10. Squeaskie says:

    Actually, it is exactly what he led a civil rights revolution and got assassinated for. Freedom is exactly what he wanted.

  11. ack154 says:

    This made me think of a local news story today:

    http://www.the-leader.com/news/x2028879747/Man-arrested-after-Watkins-Glen-standoff

    Pretty much nails home the point of this one.

  12. asdf says:

    And get off my lawn! Damn kids these days…

    *mutter*

  13. diabeetus ieatus says:

    daaaaannnnggg POWN’D!

  14. i_@m_#1 says:

    Confession prayer, “Forgive me Lord for I have sinned ( yes, I know I really need to knock it off) I used to sneak up and pants the guys who did that at my middle school. just the guys who were jerks to me. It wasn’t long before they got the hint and started pulling them up and using a belt. I’m willing to bet the principal appreciated since I never got caught and his students were following the dress code. I know it isn’t very lady like, but am I forgiven?”

    • Forgiven? You are my HERO. I’ve always wanted to do that to guys (regardless of race!) who wear the giant rodeo-clown pants belted below their equator.

    • Jessi says:

      The saggy pants thing is one of the few times in my school career that I was thankful for the strict dresscode my district enforced. Anyone with even slightly baggy pants was sent to the office by a teacher where they were asked to wear a belt. If they did not have one with them, they were given a piece of rope to use as a belt.

  15. Reika says:

    You know what? Someone get me a flamethrower, that soap box is going to die today.

  16. Alixandria says:

    AMEN! My only criticism is that his name and title was Doctor Martin Luther King, Junior.

  17. Cecona says:

    Amazing how fast the shit starts to fly when something like this appears.

  18. Alixandria says:

    I wonder how many of those goofballs would continue doing it if they knew that the fad started in prisons as a way for other inmates to know they were “taken”.

  19. Rob says:

    this is good

  20. varenoea says:

    The guy fought so that people will be respected and treated equally, no matter what they look like.

    And “no matter what they look like” includes “no matter where they wear their trousers, even if they wear them on their head.”

    Shame on you. You’re ignorant, superficial and self-righteous.

    • MLD says:

      This was basiclly my first thought.

      My second was, I’ve seen this caption before. Might’ve been a different leader, but same caption basically.

    • ay dios mio says:

      I guess that’s why MLK always looked “street” when he spoke to crowds right?

    • Jessi says:

      He did *not* fight for people to dress like fools.

      • The Truth says:

        No he got terrorist groups such as The Black Panthers to fight for him, in much the same way as Nelson Mandella hid behind the cloak of “Oooh. Nothing to do with me. I’m the Political Wing.” Sorry a Terrorist is a Terrorist. If you support Terrorism then you are as bad as the Terrorists.

        • paws4thot says:

          So you’re admitting that the US people (not the government, just the people) sponsored terrorism in Northern Ireland?

          • The Truth says:

            The Irish Americans definately did. The rest of the Americans didn’t give a damn and so supported Terrorism by default.

    • Cathy says:

      varenoea – AGREED!!! The first one here I can agree with..

  21. AngelaF. says:

    D’oh. I actually read that as a comment on the ‘anti-racist’ buzzword of ‘put your pants on’ that’s used to people who persistently disagree with them?

  22. BananaGirl48 says:

    Racist stereotypes much?

  23. ubr says:

    wow. this one hits the stupid meter… reminds me of the one with lil wayne on roflrazzi with pretty much the same caption… for some reason certain people seem to think that mlk only stood for freedom as long as you mimicked white culture…

  24. orrion23 says:

    civil rights has nothing to do with how people wear their clothes

  25. Me :D says:

    I have a dream… that one day my children will not be judged by the color of their skin… but by how homeless they look.

  26. Kelly says:

    actually, low-riding pants has nothing to do with race. it originated in jail, supposedly as a sign of being someone´s bitch. i´ll bet you anything the “gangsta” rapers of today would think twice if they heard about that.

    • ubr says:

      nope.
      sagging and loose clothing has nothing to do with being a prison bitch, it had to do with the fact that they don’t allow belts in jail and baggy clothing makes things easier to conceal…

  27. Dina says:

    So who are white kids who act like thugs letting down? :P

  28. gmc360 says:

    I’d rather die on my feet, than wear pant around my knees?

  29. VictoryNotVengeance says:

    I would say that is exactly what he did. The Civil Rights movement was more than just and oppressed group trying to have the opportunity in the “white man’s” world. It was a struggle to gain acknowledgment that all people of all skin colors were to be respected as brothers and sisters. A movement to promote our differences and our similarities. In a way, he fought and died so that anyone could wear their pants anyhow they wanted or not at all, and it be ok because you were a person, and whatever fashion or look you choose shouldn’t cause any judgment on you. Just because our society found other ways to judge minority cultures, and they found new ways to set themselves aside and find new cultures and ways of expressing themselves, doesn’t make the struggle in vain. It just means the struggle continues. One must always try to love more, judge less, and try to understand.

    Besides…. who the hell though a tie was a good idea in the first place? Or having to wear long sleeve button-ups? Bring me my Khaki shorts and a T-Shirt any day. And whats with all the flip flop wearers? If you ever had to run you would be screwed via flat tire? And does -every-one have to have one of those rubber bands connected to their sunglasses? You can just take them off?

    • charro says:

      I got my swim trunks, and my flippy floppies..

      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

        I’m ridin’ on a dolphin, doin’ flips n sh*t. That dolphin’s splashin’, getting erryboby all wet! But this ain’t Sea World, its as real as it gets!

    • ay dios mio says:

      MLK fought for people to judge on character.
      Character dictates how you dress yourself in the morning, and if you can’t even put on a pair of pants you can still be judged. It may not be perfect, but it isn’t automatically based on race. It’s not like white people are the ONLY group that thinks a suit looks nice. Every time I go to Men’s Warehouse there are more black men, and they rock those suits better than I do.

      • VictoryNotVengeance says:

        My point it what makes you fashion police? Do you go around calling every girl in short shorts a whore? Because that’s probably what everyone from the 50’s and early 60s would think. You don’t judge, because its acceptable fashion now. If someone wants to wer their pants hanging low then by all means do it. Its not like you are seeing anything other than their boxers anyway. So just pretend they are wearing swimming attire. All those two piece female bathing suits certainly seem like underwear to me, and I don’t hear any complaints.

        • randman83 says:

          But the matter of the choice to dress that certain way still stands. If one chooses to dress like a slob, their character dictated that it was acceptable for them to dress like a slob. Whether they were motivated by a need to fit in or wanting to broadcast an image of tough, thug douchebag is irrelevant. They made a conscious decision to do so, and that decision has a consequence. The “don’t judge a book by it’s cover” routine doesn’t apply to matters of choice, because that is the only thing anyone should ever be judged by. That was what MLK fought for.

        • Jessi says:

          There is a time and a place for certain clothing. You don’t hear any complaints about two piece bathing suits at the pool or on a beach, but I guarantee you if a girl tried to wear the same thing to a grocery store or a similar place, there’d be issues.

          ‘It’s not like you are seeing anything other than their boxers anyway.’ Societal norms dictate that it is improper to sees a person’s undergarments in public. Hence the reason girls don’t go walking around in bra and underwear and nothing else. And why those who go around with underwear you can see are treated the way they are.

          There are certain rules of decency to follow when in a public place.

  30. Many V says:

    indeed, these people are probably rolling over in their graves seeing what their dreams became

  31. Kelly says:

    Try being short so your eye level to the idiots unders.

  32. Marget says:

    For the record he fought for equal rights for all men, woman and children. Of all colors, so this isn’t racist at all.

  33. Fredthelog says:

    So true. I’d like to see some black guys be responsible now and again. Kinda impossible though….

    • What? says:

      I don’t usually use the term “retarded,” but in reference to this I think it more than applies. First of all, Dr. King fought and died for equal rights, and he was too busy doing so to worry about anyone’s PANTS.

      Second, what on earth do pants have to do with responsibility? If you don’t see black men being responsible, it’s because you’re not looking–not because they don’t exist, and certianly not because some people (of all ethnic backgrounds) occasionally wear loose trousers.

      • xy says:

        But now, unfortunately, I am just hearing all of Dr King’s speeches with the words “PANTS” randomly inserted in to them.

        “I have a dream – about your pants”
        “Free at last! Thank god almighty, the pants are free at last!”

        Somehow I don’t think he would have convinced quite as many people….

    • Jessi says:

      I sincerely hope this was sarcasm…

    • xy says:

      I know. Not a single black guy in America has a responsible job. It’s not like there’s one running the country or anything……

  34. Blarg says:

    He also didn’t do all that for you to run on stage and steal cute girls’ microphones to hijack their acceptance speeches. FOR SHAME, KANYE, FOR SHAME.

  35. Bubulina says:

    I think that is one of the things he fought for: so that everybody should be able to express themselves the way they see fitted.

    • Jessi says:

      So, the members of the KKK are just expressing themselves in the way they see fit – do they fall under this category?

      • villy says:

        well that’s just idiotic.

        • ay dios mio says:

          Why? It seems extreme but it is a really good point.

          • Jocasta says:

            No, it isn’t, as the KKK hurt others. Whereas pants-saggers and just look silly.

            • Jocasta says:

              Minus that ‘and’.

            • Jessi says:

              I’ve had my car broken into by a ‘pants-sagger’, I’ve also had ‘pants-saggers’ steal from my place of business.

              Sure, it’s not anywhere near the scale of pain and hurt that the Klan have inflicted, but it was still hurt.

              Anyway, Bubulina’s post was about how Dr. King fought “so that everybody should be able to express themselves the way they see fitted.” Stupid people don’t apply? Ignorant morons aren’t allowed to express themselves?

    • randman83 says:

      Actually, Dr. King was all about people having integrity, being judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. If he saw these little cretins (black and white), I think he’d knock them upside the head. The way one dresses is a choice in America, and choices reflect character. He’d be ashamed of these losers for not having integrity, not applauding them for “expressing themselves.”

      • Jessi says:

        I believe he’d do the same for the girls who feel the need to wear super skimpy clothing.

        Seriously, working in retail, there have been so many people I’ve seen that made me exclaim to fellow associates, “Who let them leave the house looking like that?!”

  36. bando says:

    the point is simple…..PULL UP YOUR DAMN PANTS! IT LOOKS LIKE HELL! really??? It has nothing to do with race…it has EVERYTHING to do with STOP LOOKING LIKE AN IDIOT THAT DOESNT KNOW HOW TO BUY PANTS THAT FIT AROUND YOUR WAIST!!! not to mention that it requires one hand to keep pulling them up. How are you supposed to complete a two-hand required activity? It just looks dumb. If you think wearing your pants around your ankles is “fashion” and that you are some how “saying something” GROW UP!

  37. villy says:

    Actually he kinda did.

    Everything he did was so that people would all have the EQUAL opportunity to live their lives as they saw fit. To be ALLOWED to just be who they are.

    I am not defending the style. Its quite ridiculous.

    But so is this caption.

  38. David says:

    seems to me this is a great example of what he stood for: to give people of colour the right to do what they wanted (within the law) without being harrassed for it.

  39. purpose says:

    He also didn’t lead a major civil rights struggle and get assassinated for you to generalize all black people as having sagging pants…

  40. Dustie says:

    I have to reference my young adult daughter here: she always said that this was a great trend for guys because it told her right up front which ones were to big of a project to even start on. BTW, she said the same of ball caps, visors, etc. worn in ways for which they were not intended.

  41. faith says:

    its not funny, but its true!

  42. andAsh says:

    SO TRUE AND SO RIGHT!

  43. Jocasta says:

    In before white people fawning — oh, dammit, too late.

  44. tigertown says:

    amen

  45. scaryinsidemyhead says:

    Apparently, he did it so Kanye West could interrupt a white girl accepting an award and not physically get pulled off the stage.

  46. Photography says:

    hahaha love it!

  47. eldavid says:

    …or did he?

  48. Philip says:

    It sounds as if there should have been a punchline after that.

  49. Daxraiu says:

    I don’t care what color you are – Black, White, Red, Yellow, brown… potato potahto – Pull your god damn pants up!

  50. Anna says:

    That wasn’t really funny, and kind of offensive. I don’t think that a couple kids in baggy pants would really bother Dr. King.

  51. PkG says:

    Genius! My scientific research leads me to believe that the lower the trousers the dumber the wearer.

  52. black ppl are cool says:

    racism… the game

  53. WtH says:

    omg its true but wow are you people rasict someone spoke the truth and then you shot him down, its not right in anyway, we should cherish the life we have and forget what the person yelled at us yesterday, man we all need to grow up and be fine with the world and happy with are neigbors.

  54. St. Peter says:

    It’s AWESOME! All you ghetto thugs!

  55. kenny fox says:

    im not going to read the other comments. i only have one thing to say. amen.

  56. T24G says:

    @kenny fox – 100% agree

  57. Mandy says:

    I’m not going to read anything else. I agree completely.

  58. Lori says:

    I was at the mall last night with a friend who just happens to be black and all these kids who just happened to be black were in the department store acting loud and stupid. When we left, I was driving towards the mall exit and there were police cars and mall security trying to break up a fight that those same kids had gotten into. They were making fools of themselves, drawing a crowd… they probably thought little of the fact that the cops had to be called in. I remembered seeing this picture and had to come home and look it up. I think Dr. King would be disgusted to see this kind of behavior. My friend and I then went across the street to Target and saw a white guy getting arrested, supposedly for shoplifting. Stupid knows no race I guess.

  59. Rachel says:

    pants on the ground, pants on the ground

    lookin’ like a fool with your pants on the ground


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    Classicist the Zappa… on KINDNESS
    Classicist the Zappa… on Get of your
    ba12348 on Let’s imagine the look o…
    paws4thot on Get of your
    The Steve on TRAIN ORIGAMI
    pittypat on KINDNESS
    pittypat on KINDNESS
    Rando the Filthiest,… on TRAIN ORIGAMI
    Rando the Filthiest,… on Get of your
    n10bettes on TRAIN ORIGAMI
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz