Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous GIRL POWER | WHAT?!?! Next »
You know, you should’ve put a bra on. And you should’ve worn a nicer outfit. That is, if you have one.
(Hillary Clinton and Natalie Portman)
Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: dunno source via Advanced Lol Builder
 | YoYo Bama on SPEECHLESS |
 | mememememe on SPEECHLESS |
 | gmc360 on SPEECHLESS |
 | /( Y )\ on SPEECHLESS |
| YoYo Bama on SPEECHLESS |
 | Nic on ABSTINENCE |
| YoYo Bama on SPEECHLESS |
| Nic on SPEECHLESS |
 | paws4thot on SPEECHLESS |
 | KaliBurns on Lolrus Nooz |
Cheezburger Network Blog
hmm..no pic that I can see
It doesn’t work for me either.
that happened to me yesterday with a LOLdogs pic… it works now though
Pic works for me, but
Why are those 2 together?
I would kind of like to see what these two are staring at.
Compared to her bright orange pantsuit this isn’t too bad.
*in best Hannibal Lecter voice*
“Oh Senator… Love your suit.”
It’s not really funny. Your not missing out.
Just came up..the pic..not me…your right…not very funny
Both of you!!
You’re you’re you’re you’re!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At least they didn’t end their sentences with a preposition, like Hilary up there.
THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!
And never forget it!!!!!
Reminds me of a joke that goes something like this:
-
A college student was wandering around campus looking for the library, when he sees a professor. Walking up to him he asks, “Excuse me, but could you tell me where the library is at?” The professor puts on his most indiginant look and says, “Young man, you are now in college and you should have learned by now that you never end your sentence with a preposition!” The young man thinks about this for a minute and then asks, “Excuse me, can you tell me where the library is at, asshole?”
I hear that one around here all the time. My Papa, when I asked where my Grammie was ‘at’, he’d say between the A and the T.
Yup yup yup….feminism in politiks – still judged on what you wear, and not what you have to say or do. :/
…and always will be.
What you wear, your hairstyle, how effective your fake smile is, etc. Of course the male politicians all have fake smiles, plus comb-overs or toupees, but…!
well if she just went into the kitchen and made bitter troll some pie, would she really have to worry about all that fake smile stuffs?
I like pie!
+97 points. Sorry I’m late.
At one point I really wanted to become a televangelist (ask me about Jupeterianism, go ahead, ask me), but the whole thing about having to do a comb-over just kind of turned me off.
Compared to the bright orange pantsuit this isn’t too bad.
The black pantsuit is dull, but professional. The nipple exposure is at best sloppy and at worst trashy. And the caption isn’t particularly funny….
Flodnak, I saw what you did there.
Wait a minute, this can’t be little gator and flodnak from AFU, is it (I realize it’s been more than a decade since I was active there)? If so, howdy (and I hope you’re still making those cookies). If not, never mind.
.that’s me! now making lols since, um, whenever i started/
Yeah, because when the word “pantsuit” comes up, it really conjures images of exciting fashion choices!
Exciting fashion choices are not necessarily a good idea in politics.
Professional usually isn’t exciting, and you’re right. It’s not really supposed to be. You don’t want your clothes distracting from what you’re doing.
Even the word, “pantsuit” reeks of sexism. It descends from a time when the unusual choice of a suit with *pants* must be differentiated from what a woman is *supposed* to wear.
Good point! My feminism meter missed that one!
Does the feminism meter come with a misogynist alarm? Did you spend the extra tolerance levels and get the racism detecter?
I have the full set–homophobia radar including. I think it comes packaged with the socially liberal politics : )
Does your meter run on lithium batteries? I’m considering the photovoltaic cell version, myself!
Dilithium crystals are the way to go if you have the Star Trek edition. Hey, it was progressive for the time….
It’s a pantsuit, vs a suit with a skirt.
You really are a freak, aren’t you?
From Wiki:
Formerly, the prevailing fashion for women included some form of coat, but paired with a skirt or dress. Hence the name pant-suit.
Gee, thanks DT, because of course that ‘freak’ includes me as well. The English language does have some sexist underpinnings here and there, and commenting on it is not hostility towards men. I think perhaps you’re a bit over-caffeinated today?
Pantsuit is not sexist. It’s descriptive of what she is wearing.
Or is it sexist to describe Barack’s clothing as a double-brested suit?
*breasted
I think that was the point of the comment – why point out the difference?
Because there’s an entire industry devoted to doing just that. Do you want them to lose their jobs?
Sure! Have you ever tried to find decent clothing for a female viking? Off with all of their heads!
“Have you ever tried to find decent clothing for a female viking?”
`
Sears has some OK-looking metal bras, but just TRY finding a horned helmet that will fit over long blonde braids!
“Even the word, “pantsuit” reeks of sexism. It descends from a time when the unusual choice of a suit with *pants* must be differentiated from what a woman is *supposed* to wear.”
`
I don’t see it quite that way. I interpret “pantsuit” as slacks and a matching blazer, as opposed to “suit”, which I interpet as a skirt and a matching blazer. I suppose it could be labeled sexist in that only women have the option to wear a skirted suit, but that’s stretching it (the point, not the suit) a bit.
So does single and double breasted. What are you gonna do?
Crank up “James Brown’s Greatest Hits” and dance around the house.
if hallry is only single breasted, no wonder bill humping fat interns
Agreed- I think it’s an identification, rather than implying that they’re not supposed to be wearing said articles of clothing. Women can wear two different kinds of leg-covering thingies (So can men, but let’s just say for our purposes they refused to.)
therefore, the type of clothing they choose for the suit should be identified in the word, because when it’s a woman, it could be one of either.
I think that’s what she means: if you refer to a woman wearing a “suit”, the assumption is automatically a skirt suit unless specified otherwise. Since skirts are gender-specific (and not nearly as practical as trousers), that’s where the sexism comes in- the assumption.
The assumption is also a thinly-veiled directive: you’re female, thus you should wear a skirt.
I find skirts more practical than trousers quite often. Depends on their respective cut, of course.
I don’t know why it’s considered sloppy or trashy! It’s just a natural reaction.
Also, to hide erect nipples is not really what bras are made for.
Ick, didn’t mean to post twice, it didn’t show up the first time. >_< Sorry, folks.
For this heinous infraction you are hereby sentenced to death. Save your breath, apologies are futile.
Oh BTW, it happens all the time, no sweat.
The Emperor is not as forgiving as Captain Wow…
True that, but the Emperor keeps running around in his birthday suit, so I pay him no mind!
YOu can always tell Hillary’s fake smile. She looks like a stunned mullet.
She looks like she hiding nuts for the winter.
She looks like she was on the receiving end of the ‘flashy thing’ from MIB.
She doesn’t have a real smile. Just that mouth-curve-thing.
The more she tries to smile, the more batshit crazy she looks.
Alot of it is in her eyes… she gets those “Wombat in the headlights” huge eyes with her mouth agape and looks like she should be popping Seraquil at the loony bin…
Wait, Hillary’s in the picture? For real? Lemme go check again…
I LOL’d
No, it’s true! She is in the picture! And it’s a really bad picture of Ms. Portman’s face, too – did you see that? Holy crud!
The only reason this could have been voted onto the front page is because of Natalie’s nips cos it ain’t funny.
But nevertheless it’s always great to see Natalie’s nips so WIN.
PK/ROFLrazzi Rule #1: Breasts=front page.
Wait, is there something wrong with that rule?
Well of course not. Did I say there was?
Better Natalie’s nips than Hillary’s hips.
Booooooobies!
whatchu want, natalie? to drink and fight!
whatchu need, natalie? to f*ck all night!
Someone says something about boobs and all of these nonregular people show up. Do you just have some sort of radar for the word “boob” or something?
Boobdar has pinged sir
we detect someone on interwebs said boob!
FULL SPEED AHEAD
Be careful with that boobdar. It’s very sensitive. If you try to adjust it too much, it totally freaks out.
then slams you into fatguy with saggy man boobs
Now see, you’ve totally gone and ruined the joke. Way to go.
-pouts-
bitter troll sorry…
…and bitter
…-pouts and looks up with puppy dog eyes-
bitter troll sorry…
and bitter….will give doggie back his eyes too
Okay, now that made me LMAO, seriously.
remember kids
animal abuse is funny when bitter troll does it
“then slams you into fatguy with saggy man boobs”
`
A bar near me used to have a sign advertising “topless bartenders”. It made me laugh to picture a fat middle-aged guy with back hair and a cigar tending bar shirtless, and if anybody complained, going, “What?”
Boobies are so wonderful
Boobies are so nice
Boobies go so great with scotch
Or bourbon over ice.
Some guys live for love that’s true
Some guys live for cooters
I prefer to write dumb poems
About bodacious hooters
Boobies ain’t just singular
They’re always set up double
I love to plant my face in them
And go…”BLUBBLE UBBLE UBBLE!
Boobies are so versatile
And have so many names
Knockers, ta-tas, hooters, knobs…
I call mine Ralph and James.
Boobies come in such a wide
Variety of sizes
Some are just so awesome
That they merit awesome prizes.
Of course there are some not so nice
That look like bowling pins
With stretch-marks flopping down somewhere
Around your granny’s shins.
I love to watch the gals go by
And watch their buttocks wiggle
But really I’d much rather watch
Their boobies bounce and jiggle
Some of you might laugh at me
To write this silly rhyme
But boobies are my special love
To me they are sublime.
If I were Emperor of the world
And master of all cities
I’d pass a law to keep the girls
From covering their titties
Let them puppies loose I say
Let ‘em sway and flop
Riverdance be damned I say
Let’s do the Boobie Hop
I really respect womanhood
And all their wondrous feats
Especially wet t-shirts
That show off their wondrous teats.
I see boobs were e’er I look
In mountains, lakes and rivers
I sculpt them from all kinds of things
Like marble and chopped liver.
So if you think that I’m uncouth
For where my head is at
That’s O.K, I’ll give you that…
Then swap you TIT for tat.
So in the end if you’ll forgive
My weird preoccupation
I’ll seek the help I truly need
And keep you aBREAST of the situation.
dat was beautiful
*wipes a tear from my eye*
Bravo, bravo!!
*gives standing ovation*
I cried. You are among the greatest of men. I bow to you.
Actual author here.
OK. Him then.
::tiltshead,closesoneeye&squints@Eric-in-STL::
Define . . . “nonregular” . . .
People who just kinda randomly appear just because the subject at hand are breasts. Not that that’s necessarily a problem. I just thought it was interesting.
hoomans and the obession with bewbs
gross
OK, I don’t fit that definition.
*That* definition, anyway.
I was mostly referring to a couple others who just kinda popped in with “yay fer boobies!” which is fine, but makes me think there are boobie trolls out there. But I don’t know you yet. Howdy.
I’ve seen you around.
Howdy.
I figured you were referring to them, but I was making a very (very slight) sort of a funny.
boobie trolls? breed of troll bitter troll would like to meet
If you trolls all have 6 nipples, then boobie troll probably has major back problems.
Why does she need a bra? Her girls are plenty perky without one…
It’s obviously the icy chill radiating from Hillary causing her to nip out.
I will have to, for the first time, agree with Steve on this one.
That should be the caption.
“It’s obviously the icy chill radiating from Hillary causing her to nip out.”
OK, I don’t care on what side of the political fence one falls, that SH!+ was funny.
But seriously folks, even the small ‘n’ perky should really wear a bra, otherwise they won’t stay that way for long, and once that connective tissue (ligaments and skin) stretches, only surgery can do the repair.
Besides, not wearing a bra with that shirt in public is rather like not wearing pants over your tighty-whities or boxer briefs in the same situation. Unnecessarily distracting!
OK, it’s a beautiful thing in Natalie’s case, but it is also distracting, no?!
teh awesome? Yes. Distracting? not really.
“even the small ‘n’ perky should really wear a bra”
`
Time and gravity aren’t kind to the big ones, but they don’t do the small ones any favors, either.
It looks like she IS wearing a bra…look at the curve from her left armpit to her shoulder. The shirt is slightly whiter in the area where a bra would be.
It’s just not a padded bra.
For real, it doesn’t matter how big and supportive your bra is, if it’s not PADDED, then the nips will rear their ugly heads.
Um, sorry, but disagreeing on your choice of adjective with regard to nipples. They’re one of my favorite things (at least, the adult female kind, no offense to any males reading this). I mean, I’ve never tried to work them into the song, or anything (it never occurred to me; perhaps I’m not dark or twisted enough – need more lessons, apparently).
Now I’m gonna have to spend some time and rewrite that song to make it about breasts. I have no choice. Thanks.
Nipples, actually, although if you can work breasts in that’d be awesome (as long as it’s tasteful, and all). Oh, and d’mention it – anytime.
See my chest,
See my chest,
Put my boobies to the test.
Use your eyes and hands and lips and teeth
and we’ll provide the rest…..
Boob du jour,
Fine with me,
Why it’s all quite nice you see,
Try the C-Cup, it’s delicious,
Don’t believe me? Ask Salicious!
We can’t sing, we can’t dance,
After all Sir, this ain’t France,
And a booby here is never second best!!!
Go on, unfold the blouse now,
Take a handful of the boob now,
See my chest, see my chest, see my chest!!
–
–
All I am saying. Is give bewbs a chance.
If all the soldiers in the world
put down their weapon, and picked up a woman
what a peaceful world this world would be!
Aw..redheads not warheads…blondes not bombs! Talkin’ bout brunettes not fighter jets!
Aww it’s got to be sweet sixteens not M16s
When will the government realize
it’s got to be funky sexy ladies
ugly??! no self respecting human would consider a breast or nipple ugly!
True dat!!
bitter troll not human!
you all gots ok nipples
but not 6 great nipples like bitter troll
Dang! With 6 nipples, I hope you have a nice soft shirt–one that doesn’t chafe!
Female trolls must have a hell of a time finding a bra.
And the decision making once you find those 6-pack bras!
Maximum cleavage?
Lift and separate?
A mix of both?
Oy!
I wonder if cup size varies?
“I’m a 36C, 36B, and 36D.”
troll jiggles need not match
so bras for them can be hard to find
Wouldn’t trolls just not bother with them. I mean, trolls don’t care if they sag, right?
bitter troll hangs free, swings like tarzan, dresses like him too
some uppity trolls care, it personal choice really
Suddenly that 3-breasted hooker from Total Recall doesn’t seem that impressive.
No, I don’t think so. If anything, there might be something built into the shirt, but it’s useless and thin, or it’s a camisole, no bra.
THIS! I saw that spot, too, though I’m not sure if it’s a shadow. Even so, you’re right, if it’s not a padded bra, they’re gonna poke through.
Hilary should have put a paper bag on.
I will never get tired of this picture.
Nipples FTW
Natalie *is* wearing a bra; she’s just got extremely muscular little nipples and she’s *very excited* to be meeting Hillary. And no, I don’t mean anything perverted by the word “excited,” just excited.
Yeah you do. And it gives a great visual.
hillary is ice queen, no need to deny
standing next to her would make bitter trolls
6 nipples hard too
Caption sucks. Not only is it stupid and denegrating, (which, frankly, is par for the course, I don’t even notice anymore) it’s not even funny! The ultimate sin!
Not very funny, but gets boost for making fun of Mrs. Bill Clinton.
Luuuuuvely. You’re such a sexist puke, the woman you hate doesn’t even get her own identity anymore.
Lighten up feminazi freak.
You wang?
I bang!
@Deep Thought (yeah, right):
I didn’t start the crap, the Sex Pistol up there did, Mr. Limburger cheese fathead pill-popping draft-dodger!
Get back in the kitchen. I’m hungry.
You’re always hungry . . . you should graduate from Oxy’s to speed, now, so you can lose some weight. You have a face for radio, but I’m sure you’ve been told that before.
Don’t you have someone to suck off?
Here. let me answer that for you:
“No, I don’t. My mouth is such an emasculating buzzsaw no man would ever come near it for fear of pulling back with shredded junk.”
There we go.
ROFL
If a woman’s “mouth” (i.e., words) can emasculate you, you’re not very secure in your manhood, now, are you?
Or, your grasp of language + critical thought is tenuous.
Oh yeah, that’s right, we DO want you to speak…
Or, your grasp of the nuances of relationships is apparently, lessee, non-existent?
@Deep. I think she is mistaking your humor for hostility towards women. But then it does kind of read that way in this thread. Just sayin’
You’ve gotta admit there are elements of Poe’s law emanating from this “woman.”
Perhaps. But telling her to go find someone to perform oral sex on? I find that really offensive, myself.
Since when?
Oral sex between consenting partners is one thing.
Telling a woman to go perform it on a random guy is basically telling her to go ’service’ a guy. Do you ever tell a guy to go perform oral sex on a woman, when you are mad at him?
I asked her if she had someone, remember? I didn’t’ tell her to go blow someone. You may want to reread that.
I did. I see your point. And Naoyusimi isn’t playing nice.
Your words do still bother me. However, I will admit that I have a low tolerance for guys using sex imagery to put a woman down. I find it demeaning to both sex (which should be both fun and a positive thing), and to the humans involved. (I don’t tend to hear women do it very much, but that might be the crowd I hang with?)
So, I guess my hangup got caught up in your argument.
I apologized to you in the next lol.
:rolls:
Argh–smilie failure!
I LOL’d about the “don’t you have someone to suck off”-business, until the “emasculating buzzsaw” bit followed … then, I saw him as one sees a rabid animal: ready to be put down.
I’m not “playing nice”? Hell, I thought I was just having fun with a namecalling loony until it went on and on and on. Ah, well.
So, DT, you’re really NOT a namecalling loony? VikingGal is completely right (and I’m NOT one of those extremists, either, BTW) about the language having sexist “underpinnings”, “pantsuit” being one of them, as I DETAILED above, before your revamping of it. It was fun for a bit, but you woudn’t seem to let it go, so–yeah, I was fooled … ::shrugs::
I have stuff to do, anyway.
Later, all.
You know, if you walk around all the time with Sandy Vag you’re the only one whose tender parts are rubbed raw. The rest of us just get out of your way when we see you coming. Just sayin’.
@VikingGal:
I see the “sex slam” as the “I give up” of nearly any argument btw. men & women. I take it with a grain of salt, shall we say, because it’s usually the desperate reach of 14-year-old boys when they can’t think of something else to say. Or, those with the 14-year-old boy mentality.
(Oh, wait, that’s all of ‘em.
)
Ta-ta!
Stopping? Naoy, don’t bother trying to discuss things with Deep. Even if it’s not right, or insulting, take it with a grain of salt- he just likes to poke holes in arguments and be sarcastically crude.
It’s what he’s great at.
(Oh, wait, that’s all of ‘em.
)
Now who’s sexist? Good work, kettle.
C’mon, Deep.
Let’s drop it and move to another topic, regardless of the anger….
Oh, I just find the “we’re victims and you stereotype us with your baaad sexist words and ways” amusing coupled with the “all menz are dumb horny teenagers” mentality.
I knew it was coming.
A hypocrite is a person who – but wait, who isn’t?
“Get back in the kitchen. I’m hungry.”
`
If you’re hungry, I think you should get back in the kitchen. You won’t find anything good to eat in the living room, except maybe some cheetos that fell between the couch cushions, but bitter troll already called dibs on those.
Just bring me a snack and a beer in the bedroom then, babe
-peeks out from the cushions with orange all over his face- wha?
Hey Naoy! Ignore DT, he’s just a troll like object filled with skepticism, and I don’t have any particularly funny memories of Sud. So it’s not worth it.
Bullsh!t. I command the woman to STFU, get to her knees, feed me grapes and service me as I desire.
But I thought that was my job?
BECAUSE I LEARNED IT FROM YOU WHEN YOU WERE HIGH OVER 9000 AND WOULDN’T LEAVE BRITNEY ALONEEEE!
Sorry. Meme outburst.
Tyler! Is that you??? How ya doin’, sweetie?
::hugs::
OK, really gotta go!
(Late, again.)
Oh right- Yep, there were just too damn many Tylers, so I changed it, mathter.
-hugs-
um… ba-zing?
Hmmm … she’s wearing a bra. Otherwise those silicone fakes would slide out and land on the floor.
???? Natalie Portman silicone? Not on your dang life. That’s 100% pure Israeli Princess perk right there.
They are real, and she is wearing a pretty tough bra.
But then, some other things were pretty tough.
Wow, those post-it’s come in handy. Now I don;t have to look at that wookilar that Natalie is standing next to. Really, WTF is that thing? It’s hideous and I hope she squashes it like a cockroach.
This is my lesbian fantasy come true!
+320 points.
Those are regulation points. However, that is pretty f’ed up.
natalie portman is hawt gigitty gigitty goo
Even Hilary’s birthday suit is a pantsuit.
Natalie Portman never needs to wear a bra….ever.
hmmm…. boobies.


Bottom of Form 1
Special Report
Air Date: Monday, May 19, 2008
email this article to a friend Watch the video
Banish the Bra?
Reported by:
There Know Laws Say Women Has To Wear Bra, can Go Bra Less
All The Time There Know Write Laws Books Say Women Has To Wear Bras, Just Go Braless Med Health Issuer
News College Med Health Issuer class By John Kuzmeski
Once considered a necessary undergarment, bras today lend more than just support and they have become a fashion statement! But some medical experts say the bra you wear every day could be bad for your health! 7’s Sorbonne Bannered looks into the possible link between bras and breast cancer. No longer just hidden under shirts, Victoria’s Secret brought the bra out into the open, making it a real fashion statement. But could a woman’s bra actually be dangerous to her health?” Our research has shown that the bras issue, we believe is the leading cause of breast cancer”, said Sydney Ross Singer, who wrote a book about what he believes is a link between breast cancer and bras.” In fact to look at breast disease and ignore bras is like looking at foot disease and ignoring tight shoes,” said Singer. Singer’s center conducted a study involving five thousand American women, half had breast cancer.t”Risk Is Increased By Wear A Bra Or A Bra That Too Tight The America Cancer Society Work With The Governmental The Garment They Say Parole with a smile that did cosset cancan thing about what they say about at the time smoking an bra wear did cosset wear , band years 1960 poltergeist right to go braless there was a voice disapproval at the 1960 movement , four the risk of wear a bra heart cancer backbone, now 2009 but could a women “s bra actually be dangerous to her health ?” our research has shown that the bras issue, we believe is the leading cause “ said they believes is a link between breast cancer and bra,. They looked at past behavior, including how tight the bras were and how long the women wore them. Here’s what they found:
Women who wore a bra for 24 hours a day, had a 3 out of 4 chance of developing breast cancer. If a bra is worn 12 hours a day, there was a 1 in 7 risk. And women who didn’t wear a bra had about the same rate of developing breast cancer as a man. “So what’s happening with the bra is that women are preventing the proper flushing of fluid and toxins out of their breasts,” said Singer. Singer claims a bra is too constricting, interfering with the body’s lymphatic system. This causes toxins to build up, eventually causing cancer. “If you get rid of the bra, your breasts will finally be able to flush out the fluid,” said Singer. But mainstream medical doctors dismiss the study.” There’s no evidence in any of the world research data that I’m aware of that supports the fact that breast cancer risk is increased by wearing a bra or a bra that’s too tight,” said Dr. Emil Barrera of the American Cancer Society .Dr. Barrera says women should get mammograms to reduce risk factors and not worry about their bras. “Watch their weight, exercise, drink only in moderation and don’t smoke,” said Doctor Hussein. Doctor At if Hussein, Medical Director at the Memorial Cancer Institute calls the bra study interesting, but said, “it really is hard to tell you wearing the bra in itself was the contributing factor.”
He says it’s not the bra, but the risk factors of the women who wear them that is the deciding factor. “Women who may be overweight tend to wear bras, therefore I would say the factors that contributed to those women wearing the bra contributed to their high risk rather than the bra itself,” said Doctor Hussein. He said the issue should be studied more.
But despite criticism from the medical community, Singer is sticking to his mission saying, “there’s absolutely nothing good about bras, it’s completely a fashion accessory.”
He is encouraging women to banish their bras for better health, saying, “We live in a culture where women feel insecure with a natural bust line, but if the price of fashion is disease, then you have to decide whether you want to participate in that or not.”
Singer is now studying women who go bra-free to find out if they have lower rates of breast cancer.
New England News