Do you think we got enough flags?

Do you think we got enough flags?
(Barack Obama and Stephen Harper)
Picture by: dunno source, via Advanced Lol Builder. Caption by: Estarfigam
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Politics | ALASKA Next »

Do you think we got enough flags?
(Barack Obama and Stephen Harper)
Picture by: dunno source, via Advanced Lol Builder. Caption by: Estarfigam
MEh… somewhat whitty, a political.. I give it a B.
I respect the effort, but I don’t think it deserves front page. At least it wasn’t some blatant attack on one side or the other. I guess I’ll agree on the B just cause they gave the old college try.
USA > Canada
O_O
Yes, you do have enough.
Every time I see a Canadian flag I think about South Park.
*BLAME CANADA!*
This made me lol more than the lol
Timely humour there, Cpt. Wow
That hallway would be way cooler with suits of armor….
But I do think they have enough flags.
That is definitely cooler. It’s more intimidating. Fill the halls with musty curtains and torches! Put crossed swords and the head of an elk on the wall! Huzzah!
But, but … The ceiling is all empty.
MORE FLAGS!
More cow bell!
After writing “more flags”, I actually had to watch “more cowbell” again.
I know, isn’t that hilarious?
Although, I thought writing “more cowbell” would summon morecowbell. Maybe later…..
Nope. Nowhere near enough flags.
I misread flags as something else the first time I looked…
I may come to regret this, but what did you misread it as the first time you looked?
fags?
just a guess…
Yeah, that’s definitely the misread I’m thinking Squiggly had.
That completely changes the meaning of the image. O.O
Totally. You should not be allowed to smoke in that building.
Agreed. It’s a fire hazard, the flags might catch fire.
Actually I misread it as lays with an extra l at the beginning… serious eyesight fail on my part.
No, because there isn’t a flag covering Stephen Harper’s face.
Damn Straight. Fuck him
Well.. you paid 15,000 bucks for just a hotel room.. what’s a little more on flags?
cause nobody else in politics ever paid for stupid things (bridge to nowhere) I don’t necessarily like his policies either but I think we all need to let the anniversary thing go
Were public funds used for the date? If not, I’ll let it go.
If this is the event that I think it is, Pres Obama was only in Ottawa for a couple of hours. No hotel, but big, big bucks on security.
Shouldn’t it be: “Do you think we have enough flags, eh?”
Win! Really people, get the dialect right!
Win.
PSSST- Jon, how do you use a computer in the Outback?
Then could someone call someone else a hoser?
Imagine if, every time there was a picture of an American, some idiot posted in the comments, “Shouldn’t it say “y’all”? Cause, you know, all Americans say that”
Everyone would rightly think, pfft, what an idiot.
“Eh” is a regional tick lampooned by a pair of local comedians who accidentally stumbled into an international audience in 1983.
But really, there’s no point in getting upset about it, after all, Australians have had to endure “g’day mate!” everywhere they go since 1988.
And besides, there’s no way that “eh” is as grating as “Y’all”.
Bork bork bork!
You must be Swedish!
And you’re quite obviously not from the US! (They aren’t that smart, you see.)
More seriously though, I wouldn’t mind those language stereotype quirks if they were replacing all more sinister stereotypes. They’re pretty harmless, after all. Still, there being none would be even nicer.
right, in one guess!
Really, I don’t think it’s local at all. I used to work with a guy from Wisconsin and every one in his family said “eh”. As for the Aussies saying “g’day, mate” a lot of them do. So many in fact that I have even started saying it. Or, just “mate”. And lastly, why can’t Canadians say about instead of aboot? What’s up with that?
I say about….O.o
But I do say “eh” a lot, though.
Does one cancel the other one out?LOL
Eddie, if I say ‘aboot’, I’m referring to footwear. Example, “I’m about to put aboot up your ass.”
Well, at least is wasn’t about mayonnaise on the french fries.
I live in NY, and was raised in NJ. You don’t have to tell me about language stereotypes, I’ve lived with them my whole life. And I find them humorous, because I’m not some overly sensitive pansy Canuck.
Oh yes, you are definitely not bitter about that AT ALL.
Actually, no it wouldn’t. “Eh” has grammatical rules it follows. It is used in a situation where we would say, “right” or “yes”. For example, if I said, “These flags are ridiculous, right?” a Canadian might say, “These flags are ridiculous, eh?” Or if I said, “You had too much Moosehead lager last night, yes?” a Canadian might say, “You had too much Moosehead Lager last night, eh?” At least, these were the rules laid down by my Canadian sister-in-law.
Besides, if you spent anytime in the parts of Canada where people say “Eh” you’d know that it’s never added to the end of a question, it’s used on statements, as in “you’ve got more than enough flags, eh?”
I think I said that.
” No way, Hoser!”
“Take off, eh?”
I just watched “Strange Brew” again this morning. It’s still as ridiculously hilarious as I remember!
Grammar nazi post for the day: Shouldn’t it be “have enough”??
You’ll be one overworked grammar nazi if you keep looking at this group of sites. My advice: stay out of the LOLcats forum.
That mangled syntax is done that way on purpose. It’s also a large part of why I don’t post there anymore. I like to lurk.
I know it’s like that on purpose, I can’t even look at it. Feels like I’ve stumbled into a teletubby chatroom.
Which sorta sucks because the quality of the lolz over there has this place beat all to h*ll. It used to be the opposite.
*SIIIIIGGGGHHHHH*
No. Got is used as an active verb in this instance.
“Do you think we got (acquired) enough flags?”
“Should we get (acquire) more?”
Fail.
Now part of me wonders if the handling of the Huge Amount of Flags is a part-time or full time job.
Obama’s creating jobs!! Yeah!!
As long as it’s ADA , affirmative action, equal opportunity, stimulus package oriented and governmentally approved.
Full Time Job.
Canada has large quantities of flags for all the countries in the world, as well as flags for different colonies, states, provinces and the middle earth.
Now I’m picturing the Six Flags commercial with the creepy old dancing guy.
“More flags, more fun!”
Yeah, because those “Five Flags” amusement parks just suck.
Amusement park=6 flags
Six Flags commercial=no flags
Brutally beating and killing the guy in the commercial=10 flags
More flags, more fun!
Eric, you’re forgetting the best part.
The skullfcking and chaining him to the bottom of the Marianas Trench with a huge, carnivorous sea creature.
I always get giddy whenever I see Stephen Harper on this site, even if I don’t like the guy. Yay Canada!
Me too! We Canadians are kinda sad, eh?
drinking age at 19, no wars, and the place is pretty clean ….damn im bitter over it
Drinking age is also 18. The US is ass-backwards. You can buy cigarettes and vote at 18, but you sure as shit can’t drink.
The reason for the drinking age being so high is because the brain develops well into the twenties. Lungs stop growing when body finishes, so therefore the drinking age being later is much more logical. Maybe not the nicest thing, since there’s the “people can make their own decisions” argument, but if we’re talking age minimums, it’s a logical decisions. Drinking can impair the brain permanently, and it’s especially bad when it’s still developing. Therefore they aren’t being allowed to impair a part of their body that’s still going, whereas the lungs which are affected by the smoke are fully developed.
…’check your ammo…that’s the last checkpoint before the final boss’…
Hooray! Go Lilll.!
Thrill us with your random indecipherable posts!
I ♥ you!
…call me…
…Li!i!…
…ad fartum…
…(*reboot*)…
…welcome…
…♫♪♫♪♫♪…
…(*fritz*)…
…uh-oh…
No amount of american flags could be used to cover the mistake of Obama’s presidency.
Just like no amount of Preparation H could cover up that butt-hurt, eh?