Biden eliminated in first round
Breaking News – Biden eliminated in first round of armed forces ‘Simon Says’ competition
(Joe Biden)
Picture by: dunno source. Caption by: dunno source via Breaking News Builder
You May Like:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous What a relief you’re here. | POLITICIANS Next »
» 195 Comments
-
Recent Comments
bitter troll on JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES pittypat on NERDS pittypat on JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES pittypat on JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES HelOnWheels on NERDS HelOnWheels on JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES MRob on NERDS Seriously?!?! on NERDS bitter troll on JEHOVAH’S WITNESSES bitter troll on NERDS 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Secret Service agent refuses to play, but offers to enforce the “out” policy.
LOL
Blarg’s Comment > Photo Caption
First!
you’re wrong… and you invoked ordinal post rule.
Vaginal douches may consist of water, water mixed with vinegar, or even antiseptic chemicals. Douching has been touted as having a number of supposed but unproven benefits. In addition to promising to clean the vagina of unwanted odors, it can also be used by women who wish to avoid smearing a sexual partner’s penis with menstrual blood while having intercourse during menstruation. In the past, douching was also used after intercourse as a method of birth control, though it is not effective (see below).
Many health care professionals state that douching is dangerous, as it interferes with both the vagina’s normal self-cleaning and with the natural bacterial culture of the vagina, and it might spread or introduce infections. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services strongly discourages douching, warning that it can lead to irritation, bacterial vaginosis, and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Frequent douching with water may result in an imbalance of the pH of the vagina, and thus may put women at risk for possible vaginal infections, especially yeast infections.[1]
In May 2003, a randomized, controlled, multi-center study was conducted with 1827 women ages 18–44 who were regular users of a douche product and who had been treated recently for a sexually transmitted bacterial infection or bacterial vaginosis. Women were randomly assigned to use either a newly designed and marketed douche product or a soft cloth towelette. There was little or no indication of a greater risk of PID among women assigned to use the douche product (versus soft cloth towelette). Douching may be related to a lower probability that a woman becomes pregnant.[2]
Antiseptics may also result in an imbalance of the natural bacteria in the vagina, also resulting in an increased likelihood of infection.[3] Furthermore, unclean douching equipment may also introduce undesirable foreign bodies into the vagina. For these reasons, the practice of douching is now strongly discouraged except when ordered by a physician for specific medical reasons.[3] Douching may also wash bacteria into the uterus and Fallopian tubes, causing fertility problems.[4]
In May 2007, 40 women were enrolled in a open-label trial. The women all had bacterial vaginosis as defined by Amsel’s criteria and were treated for 6 days with a douche containing Lactobacillus acidophilus. Vaginal smears were collected from the patients and analyzed according to Nugent’s criteria at the time of diagnosis, after 6 days of treatment, and again at 20 days after the last treatment. At the same times, determination of vaginal pH and a Whiff test were performed. RESULTS: The Nugent score decreased significantly from bacterial vaginosis or an intermediate flora toward a normal flora during treatment, and remained low during the follow-up period for almost all of the patients, indicating bacterial vaginosis in 52.5% and in 7.5% of the patients before treatment and at follow-up, respectively. After treatment, significant decreases in vaginal pH were observed, to less than pH 4.5 in 34/40 women, and the odor test became negative in all of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, treatment of bacterial vaginosis with a vaginal douche containing a strain of L. acidophilus contributed to the restoration of a normal vaginal environment.[5]
Douching after intercourse is estimated to reduce the chances of conception by only 15-25%. In comparison, proper condom use reduces the chance of conception by as much as 97%. In some cases douching may force the ejaculate further into the vagina, increasing the chance of pregnancy. A review of studies by researchers at the University of Rochester Medical Center (N.Y.) showed that women who douched regularly and later became pregnant had higher rates of ectopic pregnancy, infections, and low birth weight infants than women who only douched occasionally or who never douched.[3]
The practice of douching is now largely restricted to the United States, where douching equipment is often available in pharmacies. A 1995 survey quoted in the University of Rochester study found that 27 percent of U.S. women age 15 to 44 douched regularly, but that douching was more common among African-American women (over 50%) than among white women (21%).[3]
The irrigation of the anus is also known as an enema.
Slang uses
Douchebag, or simply douche, is considered to be a pejorative term in North America. In other English speaking countries the term is not well known. The slang usage of the term dates back to the 1960s.[6] The term implies a variety of negative qualities, specifically arrogance and engaging in obnoxious and/or irritating actions without malicious intent. It is generally used for males only.
I am SO in love!
tee hee. i feel just SO lucky. *blush**blush*
*applauds* Good form, Shortright, good form!
*takes a bow*
NB: this is preemptive for all the people who will say that biden is an idiot and is making an unbelievably insensitive gaffe.
believe it or not… but biden’s actually doing this correctly. unless you are in *uniform* you are not supposed to salute the flag/military officials, you are supposed to put your hand over your heart.
I believe you’re referring to the national anthem and/or colors, however he can return a salute from military personnel. And yes Biden is doing it correct, for the most part, he does have his hand awefully low………
That’s where the heart is in his species.
lol…name that species!
Pikachu!
Bulbasaur!
Charzard?
Damazat?
Oh oh Chupacabra!
Chupa-thingy!
Fresh!
*hits Eric in head with handbag*
No no no no no. You don’t understand. [link]
Chupa means suck.
Suckthingy?
I can help them find something to suck.
Chubby- thingy!!!!!
I like it…. got a rrring to it.
Chalupa!
What, you mean the Puma?
AYA-FRICKA!
I can appreciate that…they say the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach. I know mine is pretty close because when I bite into a perfectly cooked sirloin or a big juicy cheeseburger I sometimes think I’m in love…then I realize it can’t be love because there’s no boobs involved.
Shortright is correct though, the same rule applies to Boy Scouts and the national athem/colors. In-uniform, you salute the flag and you may leave your hat on. Out of uniform, you remove your hat and place your hand over your heart.
that’s where i learned my flag/military/anthem etiquette! 2 summers working boy scout camp staff yelling at kids for wearing hats during flag. aaaaah good times.
My ex used to say “the way to a man’s heart is through his sternum with a sharp knife”. Scary, scary girl.
it sounds like i would like her… but i’m not scary. just pragmatic.
I’ve always wondered where one could find that kind of information…
Sounds like you and I both married the same woman at some point.
No, the “best” way.
You can also reach down his throat and rip it out, if the conditions are just right.
No no, you’re all wrong.
The *shortest* way is through the sternum, with a knife or bone saw (recommended for speed).
Lacking proper tools, the *best* way is through the stomach, then turning upwards, thus bypassing the ribcage altogether.
But I like Ivan’s ex anyway. Deadly women are hot.
“I can appreciate that…they say the way to a man’s heart is through his stomach.”
Um, no. Good cooks come and go, but boobs are forever.
heart
The heart is not the protruding object south of your navel.
Yeah that’s my hernia!!!
The two usually have to come to a consensus. When one of the two gets left out, it’s not pretty.
“Boobs are forever.”
BWAHAHAHAHA!
How old are you, Eric? Because unless you plan on trading in for ever-younger models, the boobs (as you know them today) are definitely not forever…
///she says as she adjusts the shoulder strap on her bra to hoist the damn things up AGAIN.
A good cook, however, will usually only improve over time. Gravity rarely makes an impact on one’s culinary skills, except for the occasional egg on the floor.
Good point.
I’ve been getting the impression lately that the effects of gravity don’t seem to bother menfolk in quite the same way as it bothers those of us having to purchase those more structural bras…
But then again, a good cook can have a good impression on the ladies, too!
My husband was an excellent cook, and used to have the most amazing ideas for foreplay …. having a delicious dinner cooked and ready for me when I got home, or cleaning the bathroom, or cleaning out the cat’s litter box….. THAT’S the way to a woman’s …um… womanparts.
He thought of cooking and cat poo when he was thinking of foreplay?
O.O
No, silly. Well, I’m pretty sure his line of reasoning was “what will help me get lucky?” and just improvised from there. Sometimes it was cooking, sometimes it was cleaning up cat poo that got him where he wanted to go.
Yeah, but you said “most amazing ideas for foreplay …. having a delicious dinner cooked and ready for me when I got home, or cleaning the bathroom, or cleaning out the cat’s litter box…”
I don’t think those count as ideas for foreplay, PC
However, they are GREAT ideas for how to get foreplay, at the very least.
Duly noted.
He’s patriotic, but equally hungry.
Yep. I’m wondering, what’s up with the dude in the shades doing neither?
He’s almost certainly secret service, he’s too busy looking serious to be patriotic.
I don’t get the point of a Secret Service guy LOOKING like he’s in the Secret Service. It negates the whole “secret” part.
Misnomer for sure.
The shades guy is actually a robot. He’s not programmed to acknowledge patriotic themes.
Domo arigato Mr. Robot-o!
That guys not Obama!!! What are you talking about? (Sorry had to go there…. I know I disappoint, but it was TOO open).
HAHAHAHAHA *inhales* hahahahahah…
-
oh wait, wrong comment.
erm, maybe the secret service is exempt because it would make it harder to reach their guns or something??? good question…
Is it me, or are the soldiers flanking Biden wearing bullet-proof vests… while it appears Biden is not.
“We’re sure that we’ve secured the area, sir. There should be no attempts on your life, but since we have to stand so close…”
they don’t look really bullet proof vest to me. more like flak jacket (i think that’s the wrong term but i’m brain farting on what they’re really called). but it’s still odd that the 2 nearest to him are wearing things different than everyone else.
Those are LBV’s (Load Bearing Vests) with MOLLE straps on them, to put on additional pouches for magazines, iPods, puppies, or in this case, strangely located Berettas. They wouldn’t stop a b-b gun.
Secret Service Agents aren’t supposed to do anything that distracts them from their job, which is constant surveillance and security with a VIP present, therefore they are exempt from patriotic moments, since when the VIP stands up, that is when he is most vulnerable to attack.
ya, what he said.. (i was actually there when that photo was taken… I’m actually in the background)
I guess the secret service guy is too concerned with the VP’s safety. I mean why take 30 seconds to pay respect to your nation. I mean there one of him and 1,000 soldiers. He needs to be on guard.
Meanwhile, unbeknownst to us but knownst to everyone else, a lone sniper takes aim from a building a half a mile away. He waits for the SS man to lower his guard and pay his respects to the flag. Cursing when the SS agent refuses to follow in line with everyone else, taking his attention off the vice president, the sniper decides to move on to easier fodder. Collapsing his rifle and breaking down the stand, he considers a career in selling houses, as the market is very good right now.
While I get what you mean (I would not want bodyguards to be distract my what is essentially etiquette) – what could he possibly do against a sniper?
“be distract my” really was meant to be “be distracted by”. My fingers had a will of their own there, apparently. :p
Happens to the best of us.
I forgot to add about the vests…
It’s surprising that the armed men to the sides of Biden *aren’t* wearing some sort of protective vest (though they may be underneath their ACU coat), as that is military policy, as I understood it.
Hell, I don’t know. It seemed like a good scenario at the time I wrote it. Maybe he could see the bullet whizzing in and throw himself in front of it? I have a vision of the bullet traveling at super slow speed, a la “Wanted”.
Aah, okay.
Indeed. I can see some Matrix-like scenes in that too.
Secret Service is there to stop more conventional attacks, what you can’t see in the picture are the dozens of secret service snipers and spotters preventing sniper attacks, while the agents near Biden deter short range shooters or suicide attackers.
my college invocation was given by barbara bush in 2005 or 2006… it was interesting to see just WHERE the snipers were and the secret service guys who tried to blend into the crowds. the spire of the church in the middle of campus had 4 guys on it. it’s a white spire, they were in all black… it was like elmer fudd “be vewy vewy qwuiet wes huntin wabbits”
I had Hilary Clinton when she was running for Senate in 2000. I was interesting to see how much make-up she caked on even then. Actually she started off pretty decent, and then turned it into a campaign speech. I went to a fairly conservative school, so you could se quite a few glossy eyed people.
i went to a super liberal school so i understand the glossy eyes.
however, barbara was very well spoken. didn’t talk any politics and focused on issues she felt near and dear to her… like libraries among others. she also threw in a couple rather funny anecdotes about “little george” (as she called him).
But why would one campaign speech at a quasi military school graduation? I don’t get it……… after that I totally lost a lot of respect for her (ok what little I still had).
i think hillary would have given a campaign speech to a preschool graduating class too. that’s kinda how she ran her camp…
My nephew worked in the White House; he says the Secret Service has ways of protecting the pres and vp that you can’t even imagine, but if he told you about it they’d have to kill you and him both.
There’s always a story behind the picture.
And when there isn’t a story, you make up one worthy of a child’s bedtime story.
Secret Service doesn’t pray either.
Damn Commie Bible-hatin’ bastards….
He saluted me when I graduated from the Air Force Academy, shook his hand, and gave him a salute. I think it’s a spur of the moment decision on what he feels like doing.
the_orginal_shortright, you have it right. for the national anthem only military personel are supposed to salute the flag. as for I Like Peanut Butter below you, yes biden can salute if they salute him but they are very obviously in the middle of the national anthem or presenting of the colors. either way civilians aren’t supposed to salute. even if his hand is low, who cares. this should be more about the secret service guy i mean, do we really want someone protecting our vice president or even the president that doesn’t acknowledge the flag? i mean wtf?!
“do we really want someone protecting our vice president or even the president that doesn’t acknowledge the flag? i mean wtf?!”
Um, yeah. It’s been pointed out above ^^^ that the secret service guys are supposed to be thinking about protecting the pres or the vp, not about acknowledging the flag – which, when you think about it, seems a rather arbitrary way for one to prove one’s patriotism. Makes me think of a quote by George Jean Nathan:
“Patriotism is an arbitrary veneration of real estate above principles.”
No no you guys have it ALL wrong. They ARE playing Simon Says! Can’t you people read?! Biden lost! Him and the SS guy.
“Simon says to touch your privates…”
“Uhhh… WHAT?!”
That was me explaining how the Secret Service guy is actually the only one WINNING at Simon Says, by the way.
He has an erection?
? O.O
Nevermind.
This one is a legitimate LOL. Biden isn’t making a mistake, but I do think he missed his heart. Better then that famous pic during the campaign of Obama who didn’t bother at all.
hold on, i have a joke! bush is dumb…
get it? bush is dumb! ha ha ha. oh, and if you want to say something “bad” about obama, it must be biden. because he hasn’t made any bad decisions or anything.
geezus. just make one joke that criticizes obama. throw us a bone.
So make one!
I agree with Danbala. If you have a good Obama joke, please put it on a LOL.
we make them. they don’t make it to front page…
because they’re ………….. wait for it…………………….. no, really, wait for it………………………………. not funny!
i’m a republican. but the shit you guys make then complain doesn’t make the front page is NOT funny. a picture of obama with a caption that says “ebil socialist” is not funny.
yeah, in comparison to pure crap that makes the front page, OUR stuff isn’t funny.
i doubt you’re a repub, or that you bothered to look. nice trolling tho.
Pot, meet kettle. I believe you’re both black.
well, this started with me saying that obama jokes that are really about bush aren’t really obama jokes. so i’m not sure how that could make me a pot calling a kettle black.
pray tell.
You’re accusing someone of trolling. Meanwhile, your troll horns and warts are showing. Nice broad brush there, calling a known Republican a non-Repub, and accusing her of not doing something you’d have no way of proving anyway.
-
Speaking as a far righty, I haven’t seen much funny from the right. Also, the LOL’s on the front page are all voted on by the registered people here, who trend toward lefties. It’s a democratic procedure, so what’s the big deal?
*hugs froo*
point taken @ trolling.
well, if someone wants to say my lolz aren’t funny, then i guess it will have to balance out with those that say they’re funny. but to be honest, the lamest ones i have are better than the best ones obama jokes that say “obama, i’m glad you’re here because the last guy was dumb.” you go to the republican side and they make fun of repubs. go to the democrat side and they make fun of repubs. call me crazy, but that’s not bringing balance to the force.
and aside from mine, there is plenty of gold out there. i kid you not. the problem is you have to wade thru the stuff to get to them, because they never make the front page.
I have a feeling that the really funny ones that get a lot of votes that are on the repub side might get set as offensive by someone so they never really see the light of day… Just a thought, otherwise I can’t figure it out myself. I see a lot of hilarious ones that never make it.
Funny is an extremely subjective thing, as we all know. And I’ve found myself guilty of voting “Win” on LOLs that weren’t funny to me simply because they were controversial and I know that we’d have some good conversations out of it. Oh, and I’ve voted “Win” on some just because they were offensive to the other side, but those usually had a negative number already
If it makes you feel any better, I’ve voted win on some actually funny ones that make fun of Obama. However, shortright & froo are right that the majority of the ones attacking Obama just aren’t funny. And you’re right, most of the Obama praising ones suck too. I come here to see funny captions, not just praise of any given politician.
Ding ding ding ding ding! We have a winner!
The Democrats are in charge!!!!!
i did troll a little. but bitching about it on this LOL is rather stupid considering it’s one of the least partisan ones to make the frontpage in a LONG time.
Win
yes, because i don’t find unfunny LOLs funny i’m obviuosly a democrat.
scroll back a handful LOLs… or better yet… go back to the election LOLs and take a look you dumb fcuk. my party affiliation has been clear this entire time. i’m just smart enough to realize that this site if followed by mostly liberal leaning folks. so when the LOLs are voted on *by the followers* they’re being mostly voted on by liberals.
and even if you removed the liberal/conservative aspect of the voters… shit’s still gotta be funny to make it to the homepage. all the obama bashing ones on the voting page blow chunks. find or make something funny and it’ll get voted through.
otherwise, just shut up you make the rest of us look bad.
actually my statement was not about finding something unfunny, rather than something else might be funny that you said was not.
also the name you called me was a lot worse than troll.
are you really that thin skinned to get upset because i “called you a name”??
if you get upset that easily i don’t think you’ll be long for PK.
MAN!!!!! There cowbell I called her a name too… much worse than the name she called you..
that’s the second time today too.
*pulls on fighting gloves*
you’re going dooooooown, ILPB.
I’m a lover not a fighter…… where’s Froo? That’s my fighter!!!
no fair! you’re not allowed to use the pregnant chick! the hormones are off the chart… it’s basically doping.
Hormones => Super human strength. Unless you have Haggen Daz ice cream, I W-I-N!!!
i have one better than that. STARBUCKS ice cream. coffee. ice cream. caramel. and cookie dough. all in one.
shortright – 1
ILPB – 0
*shakes self away* Huh? Someone called me? Oooh, cookie dough!
-Puts on bright orange boxing gloves and grins- ILPB, I heard there were trolls? Can I fight them?
Did somebody say caramel, cookie dough and ice cream in the same sentence? You have my attention.
Original: Has caffeine, which means Froo can’t have her morning coffee. So I’ll just pop open some Eddies Overloaded Cookie Dough and Peanut Butter Cup, and throw in a Tag-Along Blizzard from Dairy Queen.
ILPB: 1
Original: 0 (Since she looses morning coffee)
Who says Froo can’t have caffeine? Froo has caffeine all the time! It keeps the baby happy and the ebil hormones at bay! *sips diet Dr Pepper straight from the keg* You don’t take a pregnant woman’s caffeine, especially when her doctor was strangely silent on the issue!!!!
see ILPB… i win.
**puts on I’m going to mettle hat** How dare you have caffine…. don’t you know that there was a study that showed that caff makes you child born with 14 heads, eight legs, and no arms!!!!! I bet you even talk on the cell phone too!!!!!!
FINE THEN BE THAT WAY!! Froo I have a nice warm foot bath for you here. Massaging with warm water, and Pablo to rub your shoulders as you sit down.
ILPB- 1
Original- 1. :-p
no shit… I’ve been looking at PK’s comments for at least a year and it was only today I decided to stop lurking b/c people get blasted so easily on here.
Pretty much the rule here is, you want to make a political statement on PK, you better know your shit first.
U r a trol and u suk!! Nobody likes u!!!!!!
(just kidding)
You forgot to misspell “likes” as “lieks”
Aw, crap. I can’t even troll correctly.
and you need to misspell “and” some new horrific way. Tap into your inner troll and see new possibilities of douchebaggery.
I personally like it when I accidentally type “nad”. I get a giggle out of it.
It doesn’t matter if you do. And even if you cite sources, it’s never going to satisfy everyone. It’s not THEIR sources. And have mercy if you make a typing mistake. (Even if you can’t get used to a *&%$&^%$&%*(&& laptop keyboard 18 months after buying the thing)
Though I will admit it can be entertaining to read sometimes. Uncle Fester was a hoot, even if you didn’t agree with him.
*has a sad*
This may come as a surprise to you, but there are generally accepted guidelines for what makes a credible source.
In general, unless a position is specifically focused around public opinion or popular culture, it is not recommended to include blogs, public commentary, unreferenced articles, or general information from “.com” sites.
The most reliable sources for appropriate information on the internet will come from “.gov” or “.edu” sites, or sites specifically devoted to scholarly writing such as websites of scientific journals, well-known encyclopedias, and archival sites that include referenced newspaper articles or official publications.
If your position involves explaining official positions on political, ethical, or special interest group issues, websites of organizations that end in “.org” or “.net” can be very helpful, but should not necessarily be represented as unbiased sources. Many websites with “.org” exist to promote a particular viewpoint or to advertise a cause and should be cited as such.
The surest way to determine whether an article can be considered scholarly is to determine where it was published. The most credible types of publications are peer-reviewed journals, official government publications (including census information), and books from peer-reviewed or reputable publishing companies (think Oxford, Harvard, or Yale University presses).
If it is unclear from the title of the journal or the name of the publisher whether it is peer-reviewed, try checking the website of the company in the informational section. This should include background on the editorial review process and publication standards. If not, check this list of peer-reviewed journals.
An excellent place to start the search for scholarly sources is on Google Scholar, which primarily returns sources from peer-reviewed journals. One handy feature of this service is that it also displays information on the number of times the paper has been cited and how recent the publication is. Both may be useful in determining the relevancy or quality of the source.
Depending on subject, sources may be considered unreliable if they are older than five or ten years (though this may vary by field – scientific information should generally be as recent as possible).
Newspaper articles are usually unacceptable, unless you’re making a point about current events or media coverage of the topic. The same goes for magazine articles, though in some specialty magazines the feature articles are often well referenced and written by experts in the field.
See? Unlike god’s will, citing credible sources isn’t a mystery!
just a leap to name calling makes me wonder. you can call me whatever you want and i pretty much wouldn’t care.
and btw, when i said the democrat thing, i said you were either not a repub or you didn’t read the lolz. so it just wasn’t one thing.
Ass Monkey!!! that’s all I have to say about that. (Note sarcasm)
Great, ILPB….now I’ve got “Brass Monkey” stuck in my head.
…that funky monkey…
Now I’ve got it stuck in my head too. Just the chorus though. Which makes it worse.
Thank you Thank you!! **takes a bow**
Yeah, people gotta remember that we’re not the only ones who use this site. Many, many other people who never comment are voting on this pictures, and clearly a lot of them favor the jokes (some of them fairly lame) about Obama being awesome and the Republicans sucking.
it would be nice to have a more balanced site. or at least with people who can think beyond “i’m mad at bush”
Well, give us a decade or so and maybe we’ll be over it.
Then find or make one. ‘Cos you’re not likely to start a revolution to revamp PK. I’d be surprised if there wasn’t some sort of website out there devoted to bashing Democrats in caption format.
Lol…..if you think about it, that’s the way it should be, but we do get the odd total clunker on the homepage, too. Generally not as bad as the median level of dreck in voting, though. Median being on the “pull my finger” level. *sigh*
Speaking of which, I so totally do not miss that ‘Heather’ person’s contributions.
SNAP!
I remember Heather’s contributions. That was when I first got here and I wasn’t impressed at all.
I’ve read a few of her posts due to the fact that I’ve seen 98% of all LOLs due to hitting “random” and reading till I hit one I’ve seen.
I wasn’t impressed either, but I’m pretty sure I was less impressed with… this one gal on one thread… Elle, or something feminine, and then she tried to post as Jane. Using a sock.
And forgot to change her email.
**pulls Diss’ finger** hey it didn’t work….
It should at least say “socialest”.
Obviously he doesn’t, because no matter how hard you try, you aren’t able to make a funny LOL. So if even the fiercest opponents of Obama have to admit this way that they cannot make fun of him, then please accept it and stop crying like a three year old.
And since you chose to go with the “There are tons of Obama LOLs, they just don’t get appreciated” – well, name five. I will look at them, and when they are actually funny, I will fav them and say so. Until now, I’ve only seen one real LOL – Obama standing in front of two giant black jet turbines, one to the left of his head and one to his right, the caption reading something along “Hiding your ears – you’re doing it wrong”. And that wasn’t even from this year!
Heehehe. Yeah, a bit funny.
OMG!
Here’s a bone
…. ROFL!
Yeah, also a bit funny.
Really funny when you’ve been raised religious… JC the Carpenter, dontchakno… lol.
Indeed.
(Still just a bit funny. ;p )
Humor is subjective and somewhat experentially-based, I believe: I don’t find Margaret Cho one bit funny, but others really seem to like her…
Of course it is! That is one reason the whole “nuh-uh there must be a conspiracy becuase I have seen plenty of hilarious anti-Obama jokes”-palaver is a bit silly.
I agree on Cho – don’t get the funny there.
…but I do find Chris Rock and Eddie Murphy hilarious, even though I can’t directly relate to their experiences… so there has to be other elements to humor, as well.
NSFW: Eddie Murphy “Raw”
-
-
I liked this one, too.
Hopeychange.
Poor Bidey, he’s got a mean pout going on there…
BRILLIANT!!!!
Now, why can’t more lols here on PK be more like this–simple, innocent fun without descending into bitter politics?
AGH!!! Too Late!!!! *see above*
No bitter politics in MY post….just laughter because someone FINALLY managed to make a funny caption for a funny picture.
I was going to say “in before the self-appointed experts on everything start defending Biden.” Except I wasn’t. Heigh ho.
Biden’s in the right. He’s not in uniform, so he’s supposed to put his hand over his heart instead of salute.
Correct.
This is just another terrible caption by some smug a-hole who doesn’t know what he/she is talking about.
Really? And here all this time I just thought someone was trying to be funny….thank you for showing me the light! I guess it’s only funny when it’s making fun of Bush, huh?
Nope. Joe Biden is a legitimate target, oh and so is Dan Quayle.
But who’s more stupid?
This fall on ABC: Are You Smarter Than a Vice-President?
Yes.
It was going really well until Al Gore ate Dan Quayle. That was an unpleasant moment.
Well yeah… Dan left the light on… it was pretty inconvenient.
It was either gonna be Gore or Cheney getting him. Cheney heard there was gonna be Quayle there and got the wrong idea and brought his gun.
Yeah, but the other guys made him put corks in the barrell!!! Dan wasn’t hiding stage right and popping up or anything.
Wow, for the first time, I can honestly say that is actually a really good pun! You should be a pun-dit!
I haven’t seen nearly as many Biden quotes. I think the fact that you’ll never have to caption Quayle with anything but his own quotes (a picture isn’t necessary) for the lols, speaks tons for Quayle in this competition.
Or perhaps the person was just making a joke that besides the secret service memeber EVERYONE else in the picture is saluting. WOW!!! DAMN you’re worst than most of the conservatrolls!!!
Yah two funny ones today!
hi, I’m from Vietnam. Nice to visit your blog
I hope people here realize that Biden is doing nothing wrong. He is not in military service, he is a civilian, and thus he puts his hand on his heart, rather than saluting the flag.
And yes, I found the caption amusing.
Finally. i’ve been waiting for some good lulz.
Whoever posted this was never in the military…
Biden is a civilian. The rest are military. He’s actually doing it correctly.
It’s a joke. You failed.
Understood – But if you’re going to make a joke, it shouldn’t make yourself look unknowledgable about the subject. That’s my only and last comment on it.
PLEASE say more…. PUHLEEZE!!!
Dude, look at the 200 comments above you discussing EXACTLY that.
FIRST!
Banana Hammock imo.
Ummm… he’s a civilian, no saluting… surprisingly he actually did it right.
It’s all over the thread, and three posts above you.
LEARN TO READ.
Isn’t the military supposed to salute and everybody else supposed to put their hand on their heart when hearing the national anthem (in America)?
So isn’t Biden doing the right thing?
have you poeple ever heard of J-O-K-E-S maybe fred and george weasley can give ya’ll a helping hand
this post is BS. he’s a civilian that’s why he puts his hand on his heart instead of saluting the flag. they’re saying the pledge….
You guys are dumb-asses, if your are wearing a uniform, you salute, if not, you put your hand over your lest breast.