Not far from the Bill Clinton Center
Incorrect source or offensive?
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous I will not speak | Breaking News Next »
» 143 comments
-
Recent Comments
Brak the Asgardian Z… on MRE Emylie on MRE Dhoti the anti EWAda… on ABSTINENCE Emylie on MRE Brak the Asgardian Z… on Always keep Brak the Asgardian Z… on Always keep Wino on SPEECHLESS I Like Peanut Butter… on SPEECHLESS I Like Peanut Butter… on SPEECHLESS Wino on MRE 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Déjà-vu…
wasn’t the same thing here already with another Center… thingy?
actually its named after George Herbert Walker Bush, not George Jr….
thats named after george bush senior who actually had brains.
YOU FAIL!
Yes, and when has anyone ever *seen* a chicken cross a road???
Sites???
/outraged
the bill clinton library and massage parlor is in a double wide trailer in arkansas
j/k
well, there is a pretty boring Bill Clinton museum in Arkansas…you’re not far off.
you misspelled ‘boning’
But is boning every ‘pretty’?
Honey in my world yes just about every boning is pretty.
Hot damn… Sign me up.
*stands behind Death waiting to take number*
OK, since you drive such a large hard-on, I mean,
such a hard bargain, I’ll take you on as a pro boner case.
LOL! Attacking both parties win!
Ok, now THAT was funny
Stealing a joke from another website AND a book(signspotting).
Not cool…
Named for the FIRST President George Bush – who was director of the CIA before coming President. Captioners need to have more brains – so do commenters.
This is PropagandaKitchen, what do you expect? But to be fair, this one is reasonably funny if you put aside the fact that it is about the wrong George Bush, and the wrong definition of intelligence.
Hey, you got your Clinton-bashing in the same lol. Go sit in the corner and gnaw on your red meat like a good little attack dog.
I guess you didn’t read the caption, which bashes Clinton…
It has bipartisan funny. Cram it.
And here you are to show us the lack of reading comprehension. So to sum up, we have the wrong Bush, wrong definition of intelligence, a lack of reading comprehension, and your unequaled ability to be an wanker with delusions of wit.
Oh and can’t forget me, a pervert with an unequaled ability to be cranky and a somewhat unequaled ability to be a twit.
THIS LOL HAS IT ALL!!!
dwn, you used AN incorrectly…
That I did, apologies.
That’s a bit strong. It’s been nearly 30 years since HW was in the CIA, and they don’t show the middle initials. I didn’t know he was CIA until a few years ago, I think my US history classes stopped at the Nixon times.
Well, it was named that before Dubya became president, so it’s quite likely that no one thought they’d ever need to use 41’s middle initials.
History fail! He was director of the CIA before becoming VICE President to Regan. He was elected President after Regan’s second term.
haha I laughed, used or not.. I drove by that sign once and laughed for about a mile.
Same here.
This one made me lol. Awesome!
I think it’s safe to say the biggest mistake Bush Sr. ever made was naming his son after himself…. Jr. has ruined it for all eternity.
That was his 2nd biggest mistake.
His biggest mistake was not using contraceptives.
Not eating a bullet when he was 23
Yeah, I went there = )
yeah, f— bush sr. he only piloted an avenger in the pacific theater of ww2 dropping bombs on target with an engine on fire…
Much as I hate the Bush clan and their position as one of America’s ruling families, I have to agree with your point: anyone who risks their life serving in the armed forces deserves our respect and gratitude. Not our worship, but at least a quiet “thank you”.
Hear hear!
and also close to the Howard Taft weight loss clinic.
all 3 (Bush + Clinton + Taft)= pee in your pants funny.
…and only a stone’s throw away from the LBJ Charm School.
which is next to the nixon school of ethics…
Um, ubr, Pitty already made a comment about Nixon’s ethics…
Maybe ubr is commenting on the geography?
Possible, though the rewording makes me think he believed it an original idea. However, I get cranky at this time of the evening so I am probably being harsh.
Time for a snack, I think!
*hands over cookies*
*noms*
I’ve learned to ‘hear’ my late afternoon grouchies as low blood sugar. *noms a few cookies, also*
Want some milk with?
Well I for one think it was worth repeating
and the Lincoln Dental Clinic
Just around the corner from the Gerry Ford Center for Grace and Poise and the George Washington Dental Hygiene Clinic.
Across from the Nixon Institute of Ethical Conduct.
Isn’t that close to the Teddy Roosevelt Sanctuary for Exotic Animals?
+
ROFL!
Are there any US Presidents not worth dissing?
Nope! No perfect humans, yet, either!
How about the Thomas Jefferson Center for Freedom and Equality?
Which is made all the funnier by his number of illegitmate children with his slaves…
The Ulysses S. Grant Institute for Integrity in Government
naw, grant formed the first alcoholism research center…
AND he did a lot of the research!
It’s called the Museum of natural history in NYC. :/ If anything, he respected wildlife more than any of the other presidents before him, I believe…they freaking called the “Teddy Bear” after him.
Oh, and don’t forget that “Silent” Calvin Coolidge’s Speech Therapy Clinic is around the corner!
Not so much. Link.
All told, Roosevelt and his companions killed or trapped over 11,397 animals, from insects and moles to hippopotamuses and elephants. 512 of the animals were big game animals, including six rare white rhinos. 262 of these were consumed by the expedition. Tons of salted animals and their skins were shipped to Washington; the quantity was so large that it took years to mount them all, and the Smithsonian was able to share many duplicate animals with other museums.
Well, I didn’t deny that he DIDN’T hunt down animals, but in the end at least the animals were used for a good purpose. At least he was one of the first to set up an environmental protection policy regarding natural parks.
Around the corner from the site of the annual FDR Marathon Race.
Isn’t that across from the William Henry Harrison Center for Longevity Research?
No, no, no. You’re thinking of the Reagan Center for Memory Research. The Longevity Center is right next door.
You’re both wrong.
It’s the Andrew Jackson Multicultural Rape Crisis Center!
Across the street from the Thomas Jefferson Center for Orphans
Is that in the same block as the National Headquarters for JFK’s Sex Addicts Anonymous?
Why yes, yes it is.
And the Andrew Jackson Anger Control Center.
Next is the President Nexus Massage Parlor and Erotic Library…
I fail to see the humorous irony in this submission… unless you’re either asexual or dead.
Sometimes, it is about truth, not irony…
Oh. I see. It’s both.
You would be surprised what necromancy does to your libido but no, I’m not Dick Cheney…
And the Monroe Center for Latino Self-Determination
Down the street from the William McKinley shooting range.
And across the mall from the Zachary Taylor Food Poisoning Clinic and Research Center.
I know that building – it also has the George W. Bush School of Elocution.
That’s fricken’ awesome! (And WHH was my great-great-great-grandfather’s first cousin)
I’m not a President but I think I’ll build the AC school of organisation, punctuality and common sense…
How do you know a politician is lying?
His lips are moving.
I drove by that sign last weekend! I almost stopped to take a picture until I remembered it was Senior, but it still made me laugh all the way to Great Falls
Soon we’ll have the Obama Center for Narcissistic Personality Disorder…
Do you actually know anything about clinical narcisssism? I do, because I’m a narcissist. The Bush administration actually showed more signs of narcissism, such as believing that other people are extensions of yourself so it’s okay to impose your way of thinking on them, i.e., Iraq. Also, refusing to admit you’re wrong no matter how glaringly obvious it is – once again, Iraq. That doesn’t mean I think W has NPD; the source of the problem was Cheney.
Ah but this person is dealing with projection, so your explanation is probably falling on deaf ears since none of it is them but the other person…
First, W’s IQ was actually about 125 or higher, not that it matters.
Secondly, I believe that it’s wrong to torture your own people by making them watch as their family is raped, or putting them into human meat grinders, etc. I have no problem imposing that belief on another person.
Third, Iraq was in direct violation of U.N. (as impotent as they are) resolutions. According to the U.N. definition of “weapons of mass destruction” Iraq had them all over the place. We were already at war with Iraq years ago. Then we had a treaty. Then Iraq broke said treaty all over the place. The war is totally justified.
One more thing; notice I have attacked no person in my arguments, only ideas or points of view. Fell free to rebut my view I only request that any of you treat me with the same respect I have shown you.
Thanks
The Iraq war is a serious point of contention in not only world, but especially U.S. Politics. Polling shows that it is an extremely unpopular war, now lasting almost five years. We are told by pundits on the left that we never should have gone, or, by those on the right, that it doesn’t matter because we are there now and must do what is right. But doesn’t it make sense that if people thought our motives were just, they may support such an effort? Perhaps with more public support the war could already be over. I believe both are true and I will attempt to show why we had to go into Iraq and why we need to stay. I will show whose fault it is that this war effort doesn’t have the support that it should.
Reason number 1: UN Resolution 687
United Nations Resolution 687 is the cease-fire agreement that Saddam Hussein signed to end the first Iraq war in 1991. It basically stated three things: 1. That Iraq will leave Kuwait immediately and from that point respect its sovereignty. 2. That Iraq will dispose of certain weapons (we’ve all heard the term “weapons of mass destruction”) at once. And 3. That Iraq will submit at once and continually to weapons inspections from UN weapons inspectors (R-687 1-13). Iraq was blatantly in violation of at least one, and eventually two of those three terms. They toyed and mocked the UN weapons inspectors by not letting them into certain parts of certain facilities and stashing their weapons in facilities unrelated to the government like milk factories and nurseries. Sometimes they would haul weapons out on trucks as inspectors were coming in. By 2003 the weapons inspectors were gone from Iraq. This reason was never really given emphatically by the Bush administration and would fall into the poor execution file. They were playing games with inspectors when they did let them in, and eventually kicked them out. Breaking UN Resolution 687 gave the U.S. and the world the at least the legal grounds to resume a war with Iraq. Many have never thought of it that way, but that is what it is, Saddam picked up where we had let him off 12 years prior.
Reason number 2: Weapons of Mass Destruction
Sometimes I get the impression from the media and some politicians that anything short of an atomic bomb being found just isn’t a weapon of mass destruction. UNR 687 clearly defines what these weapons are. The world intelligence community knew that Iraq was stockpiling them. Could they all be wrong? Yes. But they weren’t. We did find WMDs, many times. In June of 2006 portions of a report from the National Ground Intelligence Center were declassified and discussed in congress. “This says weapons have been discovered, more weapons exist and they state that Iraq was not a WMD-free zone, that there are continuing threats from the materials that are or may still be in Iraq,”(WMDs in Iraq) said Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Senator Rick Santorum went on to read from the report of over 500 weapons munitions found since 2003 that contained weapons listed in UNR-687. Accurate reporting of the wmd situation in Iraq would have been extremely helpful to the world community and public perception.
Reason number 3: Saddam Husein
Saddam Hussein was a murderous dictator who killed his own citizens and was a leading proponent of terrorism. Numerous mass graves have been uncovered that prove Saddam Hussein was using the wmds he might have had on his own people. “We’ve already discovered just so far the remains of 400,000 people in mass graves,” (Mass Graves) said British Prime Minister Tony Blair on November 20 2006 in London. He allowed and even invited Al-Queda to open up terrorist training camps in Iraq. Writer Stephen F. Hayes obtained some leaked classified documents and wrote a very compelling story proving the link between Al Queda and Iraq. He found this in a memo in the report from a defector, “…Iraq sought AL Queda influence through its connections with Afghanistan, to facilitate the transshipment of proscribed weapons and equipment to Iraq. In return, Iraq provided AL Queda with training and instructors” (Hayes). That’s not even the worst of it. Saddam Hussein offered to pay the families of Suicide bombers $25,000 U.S. to murder innocent people (Saddam funds). This appears to be public knowledge as it was reported by all major U.S. news outlets and the BBC, but again, Bush fails to preach this from a bully pulpit. These three things alone should be morally enough even without UNR-687 or wmds to take out Saddam’s regime.
Conclusion – Remembering History
I’ve tried to show how the Iraq war is both legal and moral, so why doesn’t the public see it this way? President Bush’s reason for not putting more effort into explaining his past actions is because he is looking to the future. But maybe he should take a lesson from some of the great communicators of the history of the United States Presidency like Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Regan. Besides being great communicators with the American public and with the world, these presidents also had to deal with conflict with evil. Two of them avoided war, but two of them did not.
Sometimes we forget about things of the past. It is important to look at current events through the scope of yesterday. For instance, the evils of Nazi Germany were well known to the world and America in the 1940s. Franklin Roosevelt, known as one of America’s greatest presidents, is known as such partly because of his handling of the military in World War II. Few people today realize that FDR censored both Hollywood and the media in order to keep our enemies from knowing key information, and to help keep America a united front in the war. Can anyone imagine what the response would be now if George W. Bush used the same tactics?
How about in our dealings with Hitler, would FDR or Winston Churchill have given the Nazi’s a deadline of when we would give up like many in our government today are proposing? What would have happened if Hitler knew he only needed to hold out a few more months? I can tell you what probably would have happened – Vietnam. The communist regime in North Vietnam is open about the morale booster that the anti-war movement and the media were to them in the 1960s and 70s. Maybe if we had taken the same stance with Ho Chi Minh as we did with Hitler, they would have both met the same plight.
We even need to look back at history to see how long these types of things really take. The international community, including the United States Military, occupied Germany for nearly fifty years. That same military presence is still in Japan and Korea, yet nobody bats an eye.
So Bush has done a horrible job with the war, not with the war itself per se, but the public relations of the war. He believes that he has the moral high ground and therefore has no need to explain his position further or support it like we have in this work. His is a noble idea, but faulty nonetheless. It’s not that people around the world believe that mass murder and terrorism are okay, they just don’t believe that that is what Iraq is about. It is the president’s job to let the people know that they have the moral high ground and that their cause is worth fighting for the way FDR did in World War II. Abraham Lincoln had to tell people that not only would the Union fall apart, but the evil of slavery would continue and that it was in fact evil. His side won and he is seen as a hero, and rightfully so. President Bush sees leadership as doing what is right even when nobody else follows. But that’s just having integrity. A leader is someone who does what is right and gets people to follow. President Bush should have taken a page from Lincoln and Roosevelt. Until he does I will, and will continue to seek out the facts that he should have already given us.
Works Cited
Hayes, Stephen F. “Case Closed.” The Weekly Standard 009.11 (2003): 1. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/378fmxyz.asp
“Iraq’s Legacy of Terror: Mass Graves.” USAID. 6 May 2008 USAID. 6 May 2008 http://www.usaid.gov/iraq/legacyofterror.html
“Palestinians get Saddam funds.” BBC News. 13 Mar. 2003. 6 May 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2846365.stm
“Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found In Iraq.” FoxNews.com. 22 June 2006. 6 May 2008 http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html
“Resolution 687.” 8 Apr. 1991. 6 May 2008 http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0687.htm
That was from an essay my brother wrote a few years ago. Forgive the formatting sloppiness, this paper was written before he had the writing experience he has now.
long post man – i appreciate your approach the topic and desire to civility.. be back in 30 minutes while i read the prev. post
*hoooonk-shoooooo*
Oh, what? yes, I totally agree! Giraffes and cebus!There won’t be a test on this, will there?
The only part I can and will rebut is the reason for the Iraq war. If GWB had come out and said what you just did, that Iraq was in violation of the UN resolutions, instead of trying to sell the fact that they had nuclear weapons and were involved intimately with Al Queda, there probably wouldn’t be all this uproar over an “illegal war”. There should have been honesty about the whole situation, instead of him riding a wave of patriotism after the Towers fell into finishing up a grudge match between “the bad man who made my daddy look bad”.
Did he say WMD’s or Nukes? I honestly don’t remember. I also don’t think Saddam made Bush 41 look bad. The regime was tied to Al Queda, including paying a $25,000 incentive to the families of suicide bombers. George W. admitted that the intelligence reports on nukes were bad. Narcissists would not have admitted that.
He admitted the intelligence was bad, but that was after we were already mired into Iraq long-term. There is some serious debate as to when he knew the intelligence was bad as well. If he knew before we went in, then he lied.
-
And the WMDs were portrayed as anything from chemical to nuclear, of which there was no actual proof found, regardless of what type of support he had going in (Dems supported the war in droves……100%, IIRC). Now, making the main cause of the invasion WMDs was the mistake, not the actual invasion. GWB should have just said that we were going in to clean up the mess that the UN allowed to happen, instead of saying we were going in there because there were WMDs scattered like candy across the plains.
Also, the suicide bombers Hussein paid off were Palestinians, not AQ, and while AQ (in the form of Ansar al-Islam) had a presence in Iraq, it was in a northern part under Kurdish control, and they didn’t actually interact with the Iraqi regime in any way.
In any case, its’ a lot more likely that it will be Iran who develops nuclear weapons and then turns them over to their pet terrorists in Hamas or Hezbollah… one of the reasons the other Arab states are concerened about the “new direction” of US negotiations with Iran.
The rest of the Arab world is more scared of Iran than they’d like to let on.
Well, when you’ve got a 3 foot tall dictator with little man syndrome and a nuke, you’ve got a right to be a little nervous. Personally, I wouldn’t have a problem with launching a preemptive strike against both Ahmenidjad (sp?) and Il, but then, they make me nervous and I’m bloodthirsty
Once again. Short guys make the best evil dictators. Which means when I’m elected president of the United States, watch out! MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!!
I said that out loud didn’t I?
Are you friends with H. Ross Perot?
I’m scared of Iran. I’m scared of N. Korea. Oh well. If they want to nuke us, BRING IT, MOFO!!!!!
The regime was not tied to a-Q. That was a lie Chalabi sold to Bush, and Bush bought it because he wanted the excuse. He had a raft of intelligence reports making it quite clear it was BS, but he and Cheney picked the reports that told them what they wanted to hear and ignored the rest. Same with WMD – we still haven’t found anything he didn’t have in the 1980s, and the chemicals he had in the ’80s were what we sold him. Once our troops got into Iraq and looked around, what do you know, it turns out sanctions were working.
The war was initiated on pure pretense.
Fine, Saddam was a bad man. There are lots of bad men in the world. We don’t – and we can’t – march in after all of them. The real reasons Mr Bush chose this one have more to do with oil and with finishing what his father started and he thought he could do better, and to get us to go along he LIED TO US.
And you (and your brother) have bought into the fraud.
At least he didn’t lie about WHERE HE WAS BORN, or his grades at Yale (which he had to PAY to go to I’m sure, since he’s white).
So…just how much “free oil” are we taking out of Iraq…since that’s all you idiots can come up with?
Every word out of Obama’s mouth is a lie but you people don’t seem to have a problem with that.
Wow you’re an idiot.
Obama worshipers really can’t call anyone an idiot.
So, do you actually BELIEVE the so called “president” when he said he “didn’t know” his plane was out terrorizing the people of NY for an hour?
so, who’s the idiot?
PS: tell us about Obamas grades at Harvard, he loves telling everyone he went there, why won’t he say what kind of grades he got?
I’m hardly an Obama supporter, but even I know where he was born. Also, the grades thing is the best you can come up with, along with accusing him of taking advantage of Affirmative Action? Can you back yourself up, or are you simply making it up as you go?
The majority of better college students do not brag about grades…especially if they are very good grades. It is considered bad form. However, most graduate/professional schools will ‘invite’ you to leave if your grades fall below a B.
That said, time for “No Bama” to cite sources, or be ignored by the rest of us.
You still pay attention? You’re a better man than I am, Gunga Din.
you “know” where he was born? Were you there?
You certainly don’t “know” by seeing his birth certificate because NOBODY has and he’s spent a great deal making SURE nobody sees it because it doesn’t exist.
I said nothing about him “bragging” about his grades, he did the same thing with them that he did with his nonexistent birth certificate. How ironic that a bunch of liberal pukes who get all their “news” from CNN claim to have never heard of these things.
FrooFrou is a republican. Go back and read some lols before the election instead of willfully jumping to conclusions and you’ll see her political leanings are well documented. She’s never been an Obama supporter. Since she also doesn’t froth at the mouth and wish for her fellow Americans to suffer simply because she wants the president to fail more than she wants to be wrong, she’s sitting back and giving him a chance until next election and critiquing whatever current policies she disagrees with. I mean, really, even if it was true I’ve heard the whole birth certificate nonsense AGES before the election. If it wasn’t enough to keep him from the office what good do you think it’s going to do to ramble on about it now?
And no one has SEEN the birth certificate because he was never BORN. Obama is an evil construct built to lead all the liberals to there doom and destroy America. He is a construct of the Islamic Indonesian government built and raised to bring us to our knees by starting multiple wars and deregulating the financial industry so that it grows top heavy and brings down the world. AND he invented swine flu… wow your argument makes it all so plausible.
(sigh), him again? I swear, this guy just shows up drunk, spitting inane remarks wherever he can. I imagine him getting spittle all over the keyboard as worked up as he gets.
At any rate – the whole argument of Obama not being an American citizen is equally moronic for pretty obvious reasons. It’s just more whining and moaning from a memeber of the losing party who refuses to do their part to help America be what it is because they’re too busy throwing a temper tantrum over the results of a democratic process (that’s the election, by the way NO_BAMA, my name links to the definition just for you).
Besides, it’s bad form, to use a phrase someone else said above, to come in being all pissy and rude when the argument started intersting above was well worded and thoughtful and continued on in a civil manner until an idiot like you showed up.
p.s. you did indeed imply obama needed to “brag” about his grades, and as of yet i’ve not seen a decent argument come from your postings.
did i make ya mad?
barrier guy, i just read what you wrote. that cracked me up, thanks! i needed a laugh today
(i work in the news, so all we’ve been listening to is swine flu this, swine flu that, omg north korea is threatening to bulid a nuke! egads… anyway, it was a nice change of pace, thanks).
Obama’s birth certificate doesn’t exist?????? OMG, OBAMA WAS NEVER BORN!!!!!! That IS a scandal!!11elebenty21!1
I don’t get spending this much time obsessing over his birth certificate. He’s elected. He’s been president for 3 months now. It’s a moot point. I also don’t get the same lunatics screaming that Obama isn’t their president. Uh, actually, yes, he is. You don’t have to like it, but he is President of the United States.
If froo’s an “Obama worshiper”…..that’s like calling Uncle Fester a devout Christian.
No, she’s calling you an idiot because you sound like you’re frothing at the mouth and ranting at nobody on a street corner. Take it down a notch and (possibly) get taken more seriously.
That sound you hear is the Baby Jesus crying at the thought of Uncle Fester as a loyal follower
LOL!
It does have a certain humor to it…
@no_bama — obama graduated from harvard law school as magna cum laude – suggests pretty darn good grades wouldn’t you say? sure beats being in the bottom end of the class!
and as for obama being “so called” president – he was chosen by the people and the electoral college, had to be declared eligible before being listed on any state ballots, and
he’s in office now so get over your petty @ss self
furthermore, airforce one is his to use at his convenience, but it still belongs to the airforce (hence the designation AIRFORCE ONE) and if you seriously think he makes decisions regarding what happens with that plane when he is not on board, you are a bigger idiot than you accuse everyone else of being.
Okay, let’s assume everything you are saying is right (it’s not, but spouting of talking points without credible cites has already been addressed) and we come to some flaws in logic. You responded to Slan’s post about Bush and the Iraq war starting with, “At least he didn’t…” and so on. This implies a few things. The first is that you have nothing to refute Slan’s argument with, which is an indirect admission of Slan being correct. Next, the rest of your statements about birthplace and grades make it seem as if you believe those are worse crimes then starting a war on false pretenses that continues to cause the deaths of thousands of American soldiers. Maybe you should rethink your rebuttal skills.
“You people”?
What do you mean, “you people”?
Let’s see…”Bush lied…” Well, not only the CIA and NSA report the WMD assessment to him, but also the British MI-6, French DGSE and Russian SVR reported the same assessment. So if ALL of the major intelligence-gathering agencies in the world reported to Bush that Iraq had WMDs, pray tell how does that make Bush a “liar?”
Here’s what happened – Iraqi intelligence told Saddam that if the Western powers believed Iraq had stored quantities of WMDs no one would DARE attack them. They did such a great job making it look like they had lots of WMDs is what caused them to be attacked.
BTW, Bush has a higher IQ than John Kerry and got better grades in Law School – and his IQ is equal to that of Obamessiah, 125.
A real giggle – Gore, the “inventor of the internet” – flunked out of Divinity School. I still can’t figure that one out.
You forgot the Israeli and Iranian inteligence agencies, who believed Iraq had them, too.
“BTW, Bush has a higher IQ than John Kerry and got better grades in Law School – and his IQ is equal to that of Obamessiah, 125.”
Funny that. He nevef went to law school. And the grades he got with hi MBA were payed for with a building.
For the record, Geodub’s IQ estimates range from the very kind 125 by those who favor him, to 87, by those who don’t.
If I had to put a stake in the ground and stick to it, I would say he is fairly intelligent, but incredibly ignorant.
And.
[“The real reasons Mr Bush chose this one have more to do with oil”
Reality Fail.]
That is a partial reality fail. Oil had weight. But the biggest factor was that they knew they were in deep manure in Afghanistan and they thought they could go in and win Iraq quickly to drum up support for the war on terror.
Also Iran did not think they had weapons of mass destruction.
Israel and England did, based on intel given them by Rumsfeld.
“The real reasons Mr Bush chose this one have more to do with oil”
Reality Fail.
The only oil companies operating in Iraq are Dubai, Chinese, and Dutch.
That only works out to “Bush Oil Cronies” in some weird parallel universe where everyone’s insane.
True, there’s an American logistics company in Iraq, but there are only two companies big enough to handle that job, and the other one is TotalFinElf, and is French, so the choice was between ghetting an American company to handle it, or not handling it at all.
You believe many myths.
Bush ALWAYS defined WMD as chemical, biological, or nuclear. And we know Saddam had some of them because we’re the ones who sold them to him. To this day, some are unaccounted for and probably in Syria. People forget that the cache of chem/bio we were looking for could fit in a semi truck.
“First, W’s IQ was actually about 125 or higher, not that it matters.”
Maybe when he was in high school before he started drinking and snorting cocaine.
Just a comment on drinking and snorting cocaine…..I believe that the current POTUS admits to being completely torn up on illegal drugs when he was in highschool and college. Are you now going to slam his intelligence the same way you’re slamming Bush’s?
At least Obama admitted it. If you compare the wikipedia pages between the two, Obama admits to his drug use as “his greatest moral failure” whereas you don’t see an iota of Bush’s drug use in the article.
I think I would rather be intelligent then be chaste.
I know that I wish you were more intelligent than chaste…
Or do you wish you were intelligently chased?
While having a smart girl chase me could be fun, I’m fine.
More likely to be chased than caugt?
That implies that I am chased to begin with but I can always pretend. I usually have crazy chase me instead of simply being smart.
Those using Lynn as example must take note that she is a loon, just a damn lovable and smart loon. Still a damn loon. I mean, cmon! She’s been with me for ten years. You don’t think that requires some kind of mental damage?
No caption needed.
O think its referring to George Bush SR. Not George W. Bush.
Oxymoron, personified.
With extra attention to the moron part.
Wrong Bush that first one wasn’t as stupid as Clinton was a man slut.
…and the obama center for consistency
…and Verbal Eloquence!
pls tell that is photoshop
Ha! That’s too funny! I love Clinton, but this is quite a lulzy picture.
hey, that was already done by signspotters!
I Live THERE!!!! and I drive past it everyday!!!