You’re about to find out JUST how dangerous
“You’re about to find out JUST how dangerous smoking is to your health!”
What is happening in the picture? Tell us in the Comments
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Yurii
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous It was at this moment | Arabian Playboy Magazine Presents Next »
» 112 comments
-
Recent Comments
wickets ebil twin on GOD HATES FAGS Danbala on GOD HATES FAGS AngelicaDemone on GOD HATES FAGS viking gal, original… on RAINBOWS viking gal, original… on RAINBOWS viking gal, original… on RAINBOWS clueless on RAINBOWS wickets ebil twin on RAINBOWS Ivan, Socialist Belg… on RAINBOWS mabsba on RAINBOWS 
Cheezburger Network Blog
I can’t imagine the amount of restraint it took to keep from choking the life out of that arrogant little bastard.
+
I don’t have that kind of control…
Hey, just because there’s no picture of it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen…
you know, maybe it was just really cold that day and the guy on the right is just moving in for a kiss, you know? whispering sweet nothings to mr. police man and getting all foggy-breathed, you know.. just saying. it’s possible.
So he was saying “I love youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu……………..” ?
A kiss, well it doesn’t matter… The policeman will slap her anyway. He wouldn’t want a kiss or HER!
That’s a dude. See the adam’s apple?
It’s a girl with a large adams apple.
lol that is no girl unless they had a sex change..
if i was that police man and if i happened to have super speed reflexes i would stick the tazer gun in his mouth…
That’s no moon…
No sh!t Captain Obvious! The being perfectly spherical, made of metal, and covered in hatches and gun turrets gave it away huh?
If you like this kind of humor try yakkering.com. Its really funny.
Go away. Your ever so subtle advertising is irritating.
I know. I hate these guys.
Don’t worry, they hate you too.
Agreed. *sighs*
Is it just me that wants to shout “kiss him, you fool!”
Um… Probably. I never found smoking conducive to any kind of amorous activity.
Sidenote: I can’t bring up the Another patriotic lol so if you said anything to my recent post, I won’t be able to see it until late tonight. If you didn’t respond to me, carry on and ignore this message.
Wow, that’s the best caption I’ve seen yet!
Mexico.
i like the little signature above the cop’s name tag… i might start doing that…
.
wait… i’m too lazy to do that on every lol…
It looks like effort and I avoid that. You can see my newest lol for proof.
It’s funny how dissing a cop is a right of passage for American lefties… they pretend like they are being brave like the courageous/stupid kid in the picture above.
Good thing I’m a moderate or I would be offended.
But he said lefties. So the real question is, are you left-handed, right-handed, or ambidextrous?
Or maybe bi-dextrous?
Is this some new propaganda chocktaw is spouting? Because I missed the memo where I am supposed to dis a cop. I respect law enforcement and teach my kids to do the same. I didn’t know that wasn’t allowed?!?!??! :-/
it is. In the Netherlands we can smoke weed and blow it in the cops faces! Perfectly legal, although it is kinda sad to do so.
Yup. You’re on to us. This kid is totally serving the leftist agenda. Man, I knew it was too good to last.
In bed but not with me.
Maybe, but that’s not an American leftie. This LOL is clearly happening in one of those little countries that don’t matter.
The brave lefties are the ones actually peacefully letting the cops drag them off. There are fewer places you’d want to be in LESS than in a jail in one of those countries.
Speaking of peacefully dragging…….
-
It brings to mind the “lay-downs” to protest lax guns laws and ask for more regulation…..the protest I saw pictures of had counter protesters with signs reading “Here lie those who weren’t armed when they were robbed”. Total win for me, but then, I’m bloodthirsty
I share similar bloodlust though I don’t own a firearm. Still support gun ownership.
I have no problem regulating assault weapons. If you’re taking an Uzi or an AK47 deer hunting, you have bigger problems than needing deer meat. But leave me the hell alone when I want to carry my legally purchased, background checked, licensed handgun into my bank just in case some nutjob tries to hold it up.
Ditto for me, I’m all for collecting but you don’t need an assault rifle for deer hunting. Unless the deer have risen up and…
I’ve said too much.
Zombie deer can be taken out by flamethrowers. You still don’t need an Uzi.
I would prefer to avoid being chased by flaming zombie deer…
But flaming zombie deer are so pretty as they run through the snowy forest, setting the trees on fire! And, they can serve as a really tasty entree’ for Zombie Jesus at the Last Supper.
Unless they are coming right for you…
Don’t be silly! Jesus didn’t become a zombie until after the last supper… the rising from the dead happened later…
He ate bread and honey after he rose again, so we can add flaming zombie venison to that for some protein
Tastier than fish! And more fun to catch.
“But flaming zombie deer are so pretty as they run through the snowy forest…”
Oughtn’t that be “prancing through the snowy forest”?
Its’ difficult to prance when your hoofs are falling off due to the decomposition.
Not to mention the flaming part tends to take a little something from the prance.
Pun denied? Dammit. I’m rusty.
Ah, well. Bioengineering combined with nuclear research will combat the flaming zombie deer anyhow. [LINK]
They might be “dashing”, like the reindeer do at xmas.
(btw – marry me, herb, for your pertinent use of the word “oughtn’t”.)
Mental image win
what really pisses me off is when rifles that are completely safe (compared to other non assualt rifles) are outlawed simply because they have a pistol grip or collapsible stock… the brady bill always made me laugh because they outlawed both of those things but not the guns themselves and what happened? the gun designers came up with the thumbhole stock…
tangent: did you hear that LA county outlawed 50cal ammunition? and not 50AE rounds (desert eagle) but 50BMG rounds (m2 heavy machine gun)…
That’s like outlawing pot, but not paraphernalia. Or vice versa.
That’s the case over here. Pot is illegal, but bongs, papers, weed tins, seeds etc are all legal. Which makes complete sense in my opinion, it’s the substance which is banned, not a piece of glass or a piece of paper.
did you hear about the bill where there is going to be tracking numbers on all ammo? if you’re caught with bullets without the tracking info it will be a big misdemeanor and fine…. supposedly the tracking no. is supposed to be linked back to stores that sell ammo to minors?….. uh, yeah, that’s going to work well, especially if you are a reloader…. but even if not, you ever seen a neat enough slug dug out of a target that anything could be read on it (other than that gel on mythbusters that is)?
The bill is being pushed by the company that does the microstamping.
It’s been up the past couple years and has been tabled every time, I’m waiting for the idiot company to run out of enough money to pay for a lobbyist.
There is a lot about that which gives me a twitch…
“Total win for me, but then, I’m bloodthirsty”
Ooh, good, an opportunity to ask a question that bothers me a lot: how can an evangelical christian, follower of the “Prince of Peace”, *not* believe that using a firearm for defense is wrong? I thought that one was supposed to abhor violence, turn the other cheek, and follow Jesus’ example. When did you guys become so blood thirsty, and how can you say it’s okay to ignore some parts of the Bible (Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not wear clothes of two different cloths) but not others (Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live, hate teh gehs)?
By the fact that they are still human I would suppose but then again, I am not the focus of your question.
Also, Turn the other cheek was Jesus saying that he wanted to be slapped as an equal, not slapped dismissively. That would be a history and interpretation fail on your part. You also forgot the parable about Jesus beating people with a length of rope for making a financial mockery of the temple.
The books of the bible that vaguely and possibly don’t even reference gays are those most contended in the first place. Jesus annulled the old covenant making the laws of Leviticus nullified so the two fabrics law doesn’t apply.
As for the thou shalt not kill, you seem to be forgetting the Eye for an Eye bit.
Soooo, I think you need to re-evaluate your knowledge of the bible.
You mean the eye for an eye bit that Jesus nullified?
Shh, if he wants to use outdated biblical thinking, then I’m allowed too for the sake of making a point.
don’t forget beejeebuz never said what to do after turning the other cheek – doesn’t that imply (by lack of direction) that after getting both cheeks slapped, you can beat the snot out of the slapper?
At least a field goal kick to the twins…
good place to start at least ;p
OK, I think we can all agree LEV 18:22 is pretty clear:
“thou shalt not lie with a man as with a woman; it is an abomination”
while jesus did do a lot of revising, he was also pretty clear on his position via a vis the law, MATT 5:17:
“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them”
The bible has a lot of horiffic things to say; never apologise for them. It says them clearly and unequivocally (my favourite being 2 Kings 2:27, bear time).
If you’re a christian, you have to think long and hard about what these passages mean to you, and if you should really put so much wight behind a book penned by men. Anyone willing to take a selective, context-driven view of the bible will find it a valuable resource of inspirational quotes and sound moral advice, christian or no. Anyone trying to interpret it literally, even if they cope with the rampant contradictions, will be unable to ignore the misguided and plain horribly wrong parts.
For the record, I’m an atheist, and I have no beef with any kind of faith, only with insistence on the superlative value of a rehashed version of something written to further a political agenda.
Jesus was all about peace, love, and beads, with a side of light slamming thrown in for spice when people insult the Lord. Paul was the homo-hater, for the record.
-
The Old Testament is a squinky subject for a lot of Christians, who misinterpret the Bible as a whole in order to either make a point or judge people without feeling guilty.
-
Mark, to answer your question, the Lord never spoke specifically about the defense of home and hearth, so that’s one of those grey areas. As a Christian, I can say that I will love you as the Lord has asked me to do, and as I should with a fellow human, but if you break into my house with the intention of robbing or harming my family or myself, then I will deal with the Lord being pissed at me for taking a life later.
didn’t paul hate women too?
No. That’s a common misinterpretation by people who do. The church he was writing that letter to was in Athens (I think….I’m having to do this by memory), and was entirely peopled by former temple prostitutes. Well, not entirely, but the women in the church were not exactly known for decorum. What that letter says is that for the church to be able to prosper, the women need to quit disrupting and actually let the church get some work done instead of trying to run the church like a pagan temple. Paul was actually pretty progressive with women for the times, considering that he had many women missionaries and teachers that he guided.
-
Now, if you had Teh Ghey, then you might as well jump off the cliff with the pigs, cuz Paul thought you were teh ebil. Personally, I think that’s because Paul was dealing with his own ghey problems. He had an awful lot of male “companions”, and his best friend was a young man named Timothy, who brought him comfort. Hmmmmmm……….
Should we make reference to Closets and Narnia right about now?
I hope you know, Froo, that I think you’re an neat lady, and I hope you don’t take too personally the fact that I needle you about this stuff. That said, I always thought that the last days of Christ were meant to be an example to Christians about how he expected them to live, and to die. He didn’t strike down the Roman soldiers that came to take him away, and even healed one who was attacked by his followers. He had the power to escape his fate at any time (well, if He was really divine, which I doubt but will stipulate for the sake of argument), and chose, instead, to show his followers for all time how he expects them to deal with “those who transgress against” them.
Personally, that doesn’t work for me, but finding out that it didn’t work for those who kept pushing religion on me was one of many factors that helped form the opinion of Christianity that I have today.
I’ve always found attitudes toward the OT hard to wrap my head around. If you’re a christian and believe that, to some degree, the bible is God’s word or law or at least His sound advice, how can you gloss over the OT? I am aware of the importance of context and other significant factors, it just always comes across as ‘this half’s kinda optional really’, which I don’t get at all.
I can’t speak for everyone but, as a Christian, I believe the Bible to be God’s word. I don’t believe it to be the fourth part of the trinity or anything. We’re seeing “through a glass, darkly” and I think the Bible is as close as we get to seeing clearly. There will always difficulties and differences in reading and understanding the bible but I’m inclined to say “close enough.”
As for the OT being optional… If it’s good enough for the son of God, it’s good enough fo us. The NT is a natural progression of the OT. The OT is about God’s way for us to live & judgement when we won’t live that way. The NT is about mercy & escape from that judgement when it comes.
Someone mentioned an eye for an eye/ turn the other cheek. An eye for an eye was justice with a limit on vengeance, dead fair. Turn the other cheek is allowing someone who wrongs you mercy…
Hey, I believe that if someone comes into your home with the intent to rob them, you should have the right to capture them, “play” with them for a while, and then when you’re done, display their head on a stick on your front lawn as a warning to others.
(Bloodlust one-upmanship! Ain’t it grand?)
So if this kid got the shit kicked out of him and is then arrested for assaulting a cop, he deserved it, but when it happens to a guy like Pastor Steve Anderson it’s not ok? Is that how this double-standard works?
[link]
For those, who, like me, didn’t know who Steve Anderson is.
@ choctaw – that’s only because the right is too busy goose stepping, conforming rigid stereotypes, and calling everyone else commie pinko socialists
If we weren’t doing it, someone else would, you damn pinko commie socialist. *goosesteps away*
*videos and sells, sending Froofrou her 50%*
nope, not me – i’m too busy trying to figure out how the new camcorder works so i can sell film of police brutality and punk stupidity to the networks and double checking that i’ve got a copy of my fake journalist pass and constitution handy (wrapped around my luger sounds about right)
My favorite response to this would be a bumper sticker I saw recently “Since when did unquestioning obedience to corporate interests become patriotic”
I saw a bumper sticker just within the last hour that said:
I’m sorry officer. I thought you wanted to race.
Ya know, I am reminded more and more of a campaign I ran with Heroes in the Paladium system about a dystopian future where corporations became like a literal nobility with members of congress becoming dukes while the position of president was nullified because it was decided that it was stupid to give that much power to one man…
That’s the stupidest thing I’ve heard today.
be sure to come back later, there is bound to be some comments that will make this one almost brilliant by comparison
The truth of this statement makes me sad… Then I watch failblog and get a cheap laugh.
it is painful to see how dumb some folk can be and still walk upright, and yet somehow, i keep getting the feeling my ex is related to at least a couple of them….
Does your ex work for me? I’m not sure how some of our people remember to breathe without being reminded on a breath-by-breath basis.
no, but i’m sure some of his in-bred cousins could
I also am saddened by this reply.
HEY! I’m left handed and I’ve never done that to a police officer!
What weed?
*cough*
He’s just shotgunning the cop. After all, sharing is caring.
isn’t that why the cop is leaning so far with that smirk on his face? so he’s got the perfect excuse when he fails his ua – “but sarge, the punk blew in my face, i had to breathe it in so others wouldn’t be affected by second hand smoke”
Line of Fire Win!
all i can say is thank the gods that ua’s were just being developed when i was that punks age
4:20
We have it wrong…the guy on the right is sucking in smog surrounding the cop. He just doesn’t want the cop to get sick, you know.
KIRBY WIN!!!!
Does anyone else think the cop looks a little like John Travolta or is it just me?
I can’t see why the cop would mind, at least the kid isn’t blowing smoke up the cops a$$.
I feel an epic ‘Totally Looks Like a howler monkey’! coming on…….
I imagine most of the folk posting about how this “ignorant punk kid” desreves a throttling or whatever have no idea at all if that cop is working on behalf of a right-wing, left wing, capitalist, socialist government, religious theocracy or what, or indeed what the person blowing smoke in his face believes in or why he’s showing dissent. I’ve got a funny feeling if you find out that the government in question is one you disagree with this “punk kid” will suddenly become some kind of hero to you.
What about when this New World Order I’ve been hearing about comes and NATO and the Barack Obama secret conspiracy police take over America, take away your guns, swap your dollars for Amros, force you into a gay marriage and redistribute your wealth to the French? Would someone who blew smoke into the face of one of those police officers as they were getting out of their black helicopter be an arrogant punk or a hero?
You forgot about when Obama sends in a squad of flying monkeys and imposes anal-raping robots into EVERY school in America which will, however, then be allowed to pray but only due to forced conversion to Islam. Oh dear God! The bleak future! The terrible, terrible, false, right-wing propagandized future!
I don’t think antagonising cops is a very bright thing to do, regardless of the standpoints of the cop or the protestor.
You can protest with dignity, or obstinacy, or with dignified obstinacy. This kind of behaviour is staggeringly arrogant, and marks the punk as an immature, more-testosterone-than-brains phuckwit.
Although, if he can actually think, maybe he’s _trying_ to get beat up, and incite a riot, to make the cops look bad. In which case, has he asked all the _other_ protestors if they’re willing to be martyred for the cause?
@ ceefax — oooh, can i has one that is ocd so he can do the cleaning?
so how are those closet issues working out for you?
My closet issues are all sorted now thanks, just needed a little bit sanding off the top of one of the doors and some WD-40 on the bottom left hinge.
wd-40 is too light for hinges, try ordinary household oil (not cooking oil) or even a drop or 2 of 10-40
The only appropriate intellectual response I can give this is…
Lolwut?
I just can’t get past that kid’s hair. It’s not quite the mullet of doom, but damn close. He deserves a beat-down just for that.
Your all wrong! Its Shang Sueng. YOUR SOUL IS MINE!!!!
All I can think about in this pic besides how annoying that kid would be is that I think his skull really looks like a H. Erectus skull.
Ya know, now that you say that…
However, I have a flameshield and nachos for us when people start screaming racist. *eats nacho*
I think it’s Lou Diamond Phillips.
“Your comment is awaiting moderation”? Duuuuude. You just enabled that while I was sitting here.
That’s almost fvcking cool, man.
That’s not a regular police officer, judging from the collar and appellate pins he is some sort of royal guard to the Chrysanthemum Throne of Japan.
this is from a movie… i can’t remember what it’s called but its about skate punks from LA who just get hassled a lot. good movie, wish i knew what it was