Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

IRS AUDITOR



barack obama

IRS AUDITOR
If Barack keeps nominating, everyone who EVER dodged taxes will be paid in full!

(Barack Obama)

picture: Unknown. lol caption: bexareeni

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 261 comments

  1. Chigou says:

    To infinite tax dodgers, and beyond !!!

    • Chigou says:

      oh, and er…….. FIRST !!!

      *Runs away from first-hater mob again*

      • slan agat says:

        The name of the state of Connecticut comes from the Algonquin word meaning “big, noisy river.” thus, the Connecticut River is the Big Noisy River River.

      • Grumpy Curmugeon says:

        FAIL! You included actual content in your “First” post, thereby making it relevant, not trolling.
        You, sir (or madam) fail at being an “FIRST!” troll. If you keep this up, there is a terrible danger of you becoming a useful, productive member of society. So for heaven’s sake, do it right next time!

      • HDL_CinC_Dragon says:

        Yeah Chigou. You should be ashamed of yourself! Making worthwhile posts… what is this world coming to?

    • Kathryn in MA says:

      Heh. Keep it up and we’ll be out of this recession in no time. Next up, nominate from UBS clientele.

  2. Evertide says:

    This is not a “first” comment. Continue posting normally. Also, I don’t think I get it.

  3. AC says:

    A cheery fellow you are…

    • Jane St.Clair says:

      I am intrigued by Bob’s notion that Obama pulled a David Copperfield like magic trick on the public consciousness and tricked us into believing the economy is failing. No, no, silly people. You didn’t lose your job, it was a trick by Obama! You’re still gainfully employed and in no danger of losing your house, DON’T BELIEVE THE LIE!

      • Danbala says:

        And he managed to dupe the whole world into believeing there was a dire crisis, and he’d done all that even before being elected, basically. Maybe there is some reason to ascribe him some god-like attributes after all. :p

      • rhorho says:

        @Jane: “…that Obama pulled a David Copperfield like magic trick on the public consciousness and tricked us into believing the economy is failing.”

        [LINK] for explanation

  4. B-79 says:

    Better the money spent on social reform to improve your own country than billions of dollars invading Iraq for…?

    • slaggingham says:

      The same reason we invaded North Africa in WWII.

    • FaileV says:

      oh noes he used the communist buzzword, now we must fear

      • Jane St.Clair says:

        Really? All I heard was WHARRGARBBLE!!!

        • No one else interesting says:

          Do you just copy and paste that comment from thread to thread? ;)

          • Uncle Fester says:

            TBH, she puts more thought into her posts than you clearly
            do, arsewipe, along with blow Bama’s butt hurt wininng about
            how nasty lazy people are. Usually the nasty, lazy ones, the
            ones you have to kick their arse to get anything like a job out
            of them are the ones who sit on their big, butter basted, ass,
            while bellyaching about how lazy welfare cheats are.
            Take that in the constructive sense it meant, but you’re a cretin,
            and so’s your buddy…

            • Jane St.Clair says:

              Well, he/she IS aptly named. In response to my accused “repetitive” post, if they aren’t going to make original accusations they shouldn’t get original responses, IMO.

              • No one else interesting says:

                My apologies, good lady, that you assumed sarcasm where none existed. My point WAS that the rhetoric is so ridiculously cookie-cutter that the only appropriate response is a copy and paste job. I assumed the wordpress smiley would convey that; apparently I was wrong.

                • No one else interesting says:

                  Additionally, I may be wording things not entirely appropriately, as I am ESL — 20 years ESL, but ESL all the same.
                  So again, apologies.

            • No one else interesting says:

              Ahhhh, you’re so cute when you’re spewing vitriol :)
              The person with this username HAS been posting this comment a lot (seems to have to). I found that amusing, and was asking her, and not you.
              And when you say my buddy, to whom are you referring? I’d really like to know, so that I can contact this person. Might it be “No one interesting?” Because I really don’t have the first idea who no one interesting would be.
              You just can’t resist making a pointless comment, followed by an ellipsis, as if your pontificating is such an epiphany that the rest of us are breathlessly awaiting the continuation of your rant ….
              :lol:

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Still dancing to my tune… figured you’d not be able to resist…
                but please, continue…

              • No one else interesting says:

                I should have added, to Ms. St. Clair, that I found it amusing that she had to continue posting the same comment repetitively, as she’s refuting the same rhetoric from thread to thread.
                Must you interfere with even the most innocuous comment, and interpret it as inflammatory, or is that just how you amuse yourself?

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  My, I hit a nerve… this is fun…
                  Please continue trying to claim you have a point…
                  I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds the defence
                  amusing…

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  It’s the oxycontin suppositories that make them think that’s ‘innocuous’

                • No one else interesting (Mr. Probstian) says:

                  I didn’t say that. Someone else did. I asked a question of Jane, and was responded to with this, and that’s what I was talking about.

                  TBH, she puts more thought into her posts than you clearly
                  do, arsewipe, along with blow Bama’s butt hurt wininng about
                  how nasty lazy people are .
                  … and there’s more.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Of course you didn’t say what I quoted. I
                    made no such claim, either.

                    In your comment, you began talking about
                    Jane, then switched over to addressing
                    Unc. I see it, now that you have clarified.

                • Jane St.Clair says:

                  Rho, dear, I know how you love your little projects, but if you keep feeding this troll it’s never going to move out from under the porch and then we’ll have to call Animal Control before it starts breeding with the neighborhood cats.

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    I did not do anything wrong except make a joke and word something a little wrong; I DIDN’T say that of which I was accused and I can not understand why some people are being rude just because someone else offended them by using polite “ms.” language.
                    I went back and read as was suggested to me to do, and here’s what I saw: most people here are happiest when they have a new person make a statement so that they can attack that person and make them go away. Lots of you here jump on that person; you interpret statements that aren’t against your beliefs as being so, so you accuse people of being underhanded when the’yre really not. It is pretty sad, really, since I thought people who said they are liberals are supposed to be open and accepting for new people and their ideals. Perhaps I am wrong there.
                    Jane St. Clair, there was no need to insult me. I wasn’t trying to insult you.

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    Oh! You’re so right, I’ve been a such a wretched b*tch taking offense when someone interjects into one of my conversations by implying that my posts are unoriginal. I feel so abashed and ashamed. I’ve seen the error of my ways, no more shall I… Aw, who am I kidding? *yanks Rho’s kibble bowl out of the bushes* No more scraps for you, troll! When I call the pound I’ll request that you’re neutered.

                  • ACSIS says:

                    Yes, please remember to spay or neuter your trolls.
                    Feral trolls are the worst – nasty tempered things.

                  • rhorho says:

                    *huffs up because Jane always takes the troll
                    bait away, just when things are going nifty*

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    I’m just saying, don’t come crying to me for a field tourniquet when the next one nibbles your fingers off.

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    Why, yes, that is the truth as you see it, and now that I’ve interacted with you, thank you for being honest about the truth in yourself. Remember, I never called you that, or any, name nor did I insult you.
                    And I could link to where you have said that particular phrase many times; it is true that this is a joke, as I see.
                    One last time — I was trying to commiserate with you for having to keep repeating yourself many times over.
                    It is a shame that you do not see that, and I am sorry for you that you are angry.

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    Honestly Rho, what’d you put in this kibble, growth hormones? Maybe some of that weird plant growth stuff you use? Dear god, woman, do your experiments know no bounds? *huffs off to investigate Rho’s secret labratory*

                  • rhorho says:

                    *dashes via short-cut to evil botanical lab*

                    *hides evidence in the super-secure-safe*

                    *turns to see Jane approaching*

                    *initiates Jedi Mind Trick*

                    Hi Jane. We’re having a nice day, with no
                    trolls, aren’t we?

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    It is a shame that commenters would equate someone who did not know your rules, site-usage normals and inside jokes with someone who was denigrating your religion or politics or just being a mean spirited jerk.
                    If I knew making jokes was called being a troll, I’d naver have done it. From what I was reading here that was the best way to start out — make some jokes, funny commentary and then start talking about politics.
                    I guess that does not really work like I thought.

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    Now I don’t understand at all what you are saying to me, or even if you are saying it to me. It doesn’t make any sense to me, sorry.
                    *sigh*

                  • ACSIS says:

                    @Mr. Probstian (et al.)
                    Stop talking.
                    Move on.
                    You’ll be fine.

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    @ACSIS:
                    OK! I will do that. Thank you.
                    :)

                  • rhorho says:

                    Time will tell: You have changed your name
                    so that it is no longer similar to the other,
                    but, in the course of apologizing for the
                    misunderstanding, you managed to come up
                    with a lame excuse (that your comment was
                    one of commiseration).

                    Start over, and we’ll see how you act from
                    here. At least I will.

                    There. How does that grab you?

                  • rhorho says:

                    *is really sick of her F5 fails*

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    @ACSIS: You’re so succinct, it brings a tear to my eye.
                    @Rho: Your Jedi mind tricks do not work on me! *tries peeking behind her, sees nothing but an empty labratory with some suspicious stains on the tables* Someday you won’t be so quick, I’ll be on to your secrets then!

                  • rhorho says:

                    @Jane: Yep ACSIS was too quick for me, and
                    I was too quick for you!

                    Ironic to hide my latest experiments from
                    you, considering how Max commissioned
                    them, and all…

                  • ACSIS says:

                    @Jane
                    Slight headache.
                    I’m sure I’ll be back to my verbose self by morning.
                    ;-)

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    *sniffs* I feel as if Max and I have grown so distant of late…

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    @ACSIS: I feel it was the best course to sail in this instance. My poking-it-through-the-bars-with-a-stick-and-laughing method seemed to only be making the problem worse (and hilarious).

                  • rhorho says:

                    @Jane: Max is just busy evil-doing. Dark
                    Overlording is hard work, and don’t forget:
                    He kidnapped you because he evil-loves you.

                    What greater ties can bind?

                    Oh, and I read a book on what you’re going
                    through. You should start a weaving project
                    to stall your suitors until Max returns…

                  • Mr. Probstian says:

                    I am sorry, but I simply don’t understand what you are saying.
                    I guess I won’t try.

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    You’ll always be ‘uninteresting’ no matter
                    what name you use is the point they are
                    making, methinks…

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    @Rho: That just might work! Especially if I get them all drunk and undo all my work overnight…

                  • rhorho says:

                    @Jane: Update: Kill the maidens!!!

                    (I re-read the story. Good thing there wasn’t
                    anything good on TV last night!)

          • rhorho says:

            Regular troll with security sock is brave.

          • No one else interesting says:

            Ah yes, I see it now. It should have said; Do you “have to” just …
            Does that make more sense now, Ms. St. Clair?

    • I’m confused…if you hate the guy so much, why does your username indicate that you want to blow him? :???: Is it some type of love/hate psychodrama?

    • rnwen says:

      Yeah, I really hate it when my president wants to invest in our country’s future, rather than effing with big toys on foreign soil.

      • rhorho says:

        Yeah, I really hate it when my president listens to people and actively
        seeks to repair and salvage what’s left of our country.

        • BattleCry says:

          Yeah, I really hate it when my president listens to His party and his party only and actively seeks to repair dead socialist programs and salvage what’s left of marxism at large.

          FXT for accuracy.

          • rhorho says:

            Still doing the tired Jesus thing and throwing references to
            socialism and Marxism around like you have a clue, I see.

            WHARRGARBBLE from BattleCry: What a shock!!! *yawns*

  5. rnwen says:

    Tell me, when Bush wanted to spend billions in Iraq and in international corporations, did you blink?

    I love that when we start investing in our own country, it’s called socialism.

    Jon Stewart was right.

    • rhorho says:

      I know a fun game! Why don’t we ask Mister Bob exactly how Bush
      didn’t lead our troops needlessly to slaughter? I would love to hear another
      meaningless justification for that quagmire.

      Bob seems to believe that changing the “American” destruction of our own, tackling the problems within the black community, and seeking to soften
      the hit our nation faces economically is somehow bad for us.

      Mwen, perhaps you can help me. I’m having trouble understanding Bob.

      For starters, exactly *what* needs to stay the same???

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Actually, since the Americans have a nasty habit of charging the people they ‘liberate’ (or ‘help’ in wars) it’s more ‘business by other means’

    • BattleCry says:

      Ok, let’s analyze what you just said. “Invest in America”. In order to call it investing, there has to be an expected return. Now, not all returns are monetary. In Government there is a thing called social return. For example, as a society we benefit greatly from people receiving a good education. It leads to less crime, higher pay, better quality of life etc etc.

      However, this spending package does not assure any kind fo return, economic or otherwise. The TARP package did nothing to stem the downturn in the economy and it was actually applied to the wound directly. It wasn’t 4 billion dollars going to a pool for entities like ACORN which is about as valiant as the French in front of a German advance.

      There is no real return coming from this money. It is totally temporary and the long term effects of it will be far more devestating than any good it will do in the short term.

      • rhorho says:

        The following is from Fact Check, linked behind my name.

        McCain: The ACORN Fables

        In another attempt to paint groups and people with whom Obama has some connection in as unsavory a light as possible, McCain has gone after the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. And we’ve gone after him, for an ad accusing the group of “massive voter fraud” and for saying in the final presidential debate that ACORN is “now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy.”

        Both claims are breathtakingly inaccurate. There’s a huge difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud. And while ACORN, which hires part-time, $8-an-hour canvassers to go door-to-door and register people to vote, has had widespread problems with phony registrations invented by employees who don’t want to work, the problem has never been that it sent people to the polls using bogus identities or to vote in any other fraudulent manner. Even the Republican prosecutor of the largest ACORN case to date said the shenanigans of ACORN workers were “not intended to permit illegal voting.”

        To be sure, Obama’s interactions with the group have been greater than he has let on. But whether those ties can accurately be called “long and deep,” as McCain’s ad claims, is highly questionable.

        ACORN, itself, separated questionable voter registration forms, and
        turned them in FLAGGED as such. Your effort to equate ACORN
        with corruption indicates your lack of motivation to know the truth of the matter. You don’t question anything you hear that is consistent with
        what you *want* to hear, and it shows. Very little is as black and white
        as you wish it to be.

  6. Multi-Facets says:

    (laughing helplessly) You guys ROCK.

  7. immrlizard says:

    With as many folks being caught owing taxes, I wouldn’t be against mandatory tax checks on them every year. No wonder we come up so short on taxes.

  8. Char says:

    If Obama keeps nominating people, the Government will probably get enough in unpaid taxes to counter the stimulus plan. :)

  9. Paul Engler says:

    Man… that caption had nothing to do with the picture, at all.
    If it were a little more clever, the hating wouldn’t seem as blatant.

  10. colonelpopcorn says:

    Still funny.

  11. clamboy says:

    This “lol” (using the term quite loosely) must be the illustration next to the text definition of “meh”.

  12. bobbintb says:

    that caption makes no sense. im still scratching my head trying to figure out what he’s trying to say.

    • rnwen says:

      It took me a bit to decide whether it was really offensive or not because I couldn’t figure out what it meant. I feel it suffers from grammar clarity fail. The way I see it is they are saying that everyone Obama nominated for things had not paid back taxes, but did once they were nominated. So, if he keeps nominating, all of the people who owe back taxes will eventually “pay up.”

  13. slaggingham says:

    The process is:

    1. Don’t pay taxes.
    2. Get informed that you’re being considered for nomination.
    3. Pay your unpaid taxes.
    4. Get nominated.
    5. Media looks into your tax history.
    6. Scandal.
    7. ????
    8. Profit.


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    creaturefeature has … on And then the nasty ol…
    froofrou on Giggity Giggity
    Pleasant Troll on And then the nasty ol…
    Chandu The Neopolita… on Giggity Giggity
    The Amazing Rando on Mr. Yang Was Just Asked
    The Amazing Rando on Giggity Giggity
    The Amazing Rando on Giggity Giggity
    wickets ebil twin on Giggity Giggity
    Bix Nood on Mr. Yang Was Just Asked
    suicide_blonde on Mr. Yang Was Just Asked
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz