IRS AUDITOR

IRS AUDITOR
If Barack keeps nominating, everyone who EVER dodged taxes will be paid in full!
(Barack Obama)
picture: Unknown. lol caption: bexareeni
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous HONESTY IN POLITICS | You win this round, Blagojevich Next »

IRS AUDITOR
If Barack keeps nominating, everyone who EVER dodged taxes will be paid in full!
(Barack Obama)
picture: Unknown. lol caption: bexareeni
To infinite tax dodgers, and beyond !!!
oh, and er…….. FIRST !!!
*Runs away from first-hater mob again*
The name of the state of Connecticut comes from the Algonquin word meaning “big, noisy river.” thus, the Connecticut River is the Big Noisy River River.
According to wikipedia, “connecticut” comes from “(beside) the long tidal river”.
That makes the connecticut river the “river beside the long tidal river”
There is some scholarly dispute over the exact translation. Growing up in Connecticut, I’ve heard ‘big noisy’ a bit more often than ‘long tidal’, but that’s far from conclusive.
This is like being back stage at an Alice Cooper concert…
WE ARE NOT WORTHY!
straight from the Department of Redundancy Department
FAIL! You included actual content in your “First” post, thereby making it relevant, not trolling.
You, sir (or madam) fail at being an “FIRST!” troll. If you keep this up, there is a terrible danger of you becoming a useful, productive member of society. So for heaven’s sake, do it right next time!
Yeah Chigou. You should be ashamed of yourself! Making worthwhile posts… what is this world coming to?
Heh. Keep it up and we’ll be out of this recession in no time. Next up, nominate from UBS clientele.
This is not a “first” comment. Continue posting normally. Also, I don’t think I get it.
I think it’s translated from the original Latin…
He’s nominated some people who hadn’t paid their taxes who were forced to pay them once they were nominated. And they’ve all been publicly castigated for it, and Obama’s taking heat for not vetting them before nominating them.
ALso, I like it. Good one.
The under-reported part of all this is that in all but one of the cases in question, the back taxes were paid in full, with interest and all applicable penalties, before the nomination was considered.
Yeah, but it’s still pretty funny and somewhat ironic, given all the bitching about Cheney’s vetting Palin
Actually, no, since most of the Palin stuff was ongoing and buried until after the election, where as the tax evasion stuff was done and dusted well before the election or even their selection was considered…
-
God’s death, there are some idiots with access to technology….
Eff off, jerkwad
Have a fine day one-hand typing, now!
If Unc is typing one-handed that can only mean that some poor soul is getting the life choked out of them.
you know me too well…
*massages bruised larynx* I try to make mistakes only once.
Oh yeah, some poor thing is definitely getting the life choked out of it
Thank you, sockette, for the reasoned response. I think you’ve proved all I wanted proving…
Come, prance some more to amuse the grown ups…
You’re funny!
“It is generally inadvisable to eject directly over the
area you just bombed.” – U.S. Air Force Manual
Perhaps the best directly applicable response in recent memory…
Not ironic at all. While Obama’s nominees might have committed past transgressions, they made their amends and were the most qualified people for the positions. I “bitched” about Palin’s nomination because she was a blatantly underqualified person.
Ah yes, and Obama was massively overqualified. Don’t try to create an intelligent debate over candidates that are so similiar in one area. simply say, “I’m a liberal, I don’t like Palin, I like Obama.” Trying to rationalize the difference between a rock and a stone is just silly.
[LINK]
I assume you already know about Palin’s ongoing tax problems right? Can you imagine what fun we’d be having if she was already VP and this stuff was still coming out?!?
I don’t think Cheney was responsible for vetting Palin.
I don’t get it either. What are those who have dodged taxes getting paid?
Or does “will be paid in full” mean that nasty things happen to them?
I think “will be paid in full” refers to the way in which people who suddenly realize that their finances may be subject to scrutiny will scurry to pay their back taxes.
But it refers to those who have dodged their taxes? It says they will be paid in full? Not the taxes.
You’re right. It’s a sentence structure fail. Obviously intended to
mean that the back taxes and penalties would be paid, but
structured to mean the people would be.
Good catch for Sweden!
Maybe I have a tendency to read things a wee bit slower* and therefore more careful, when it’s in English. Especially when I don’t get it. :p
*)Than someone who has it as their first language would, I mean.
Okay, well, perhaps you read English more carefully than
we “home” types, but I’m still going to chalk this one up
to your awesomeness!
@Danbala: I was asking myself the exact same question, the sentence structure got me really confused
@rhorho: thanks for the explanation
Any time, Dear.
A cheery fellow you are…
I am intrigued by Bob’s notion that Obama pulled a David Copperfield like magic trick on the public consciousness and tricked us into believing the economy is failing. No, no, silly people. You didn’t lose your job, it was a trick by Obama! You’re still gainfully employed and in no danger of losing your house, DON’T BELIEVE THE LIE!
And he managed to dupe the whole world into believeing there was a dire crisis, and he’d done all that even before being elected, basically. Maybe there is some reason to ascribe him some god-like attributes after all. :p
I know, it’s like we elected Darth Vader. Or better yet, the Emperor! When do you think Obama will begin construction of the Death Star?
“begin”?
They’re just putting the finishing touches on it now. (You know, curtains and cushions and other fluff-fluff.)
And here I thought such a large construction project was the perfect opportunity for job creation!
The contract went to them thar darn forners. :/
I never did like outsourcing.. there goes our knowledge base!
American jobs should stay in American owned parts of space, gosh darn it! Now we’ll have to bargain with the Chinese before we test our Death Star by blowing up Pluto (it’s okay, it’s not a planet anymore).
A planette!
Don’t remember who, but a comedian on TV the
other night said (paraphrase), “Everybody is all
over Bush about what he’s done to the economy,
but no one seems to mind that he lost Pluto as
a planet. George Bush lost 11% of our planets!”
H. R. 645
So that’s what Shanklin meant by “magic negro.”
Shanklin didn’t make that up. It came from the left side of the aisle, and he ran with it.
It’s a literary term… characters like Coffey in The Green Mile is a primacie example… IIRC, the term was appropriated by the literary community from the sporting one in the 1950s
I think that the bt about the “dire crisis” refers to when the news came out that the Congressional Busget Office had predicted that the economy would start to get better by the latter half of the year, even without the stimulus bill.
Although I think that prediction was revised later… after the bill passed.
Now they’re saying it will continue to suck. Also, they say the bill will end up depressing real wages.
But hey, for our $4300 apiece, we’ll all be getting $13 per paycheck for the rest of the year!.
(Administrative math fail?)
The Kool-Aid is strong in this one…
The fail is strong with this one.
What, you don’t watch CNBC?
@Jane: “…that Obama pulled a David Copperfield like magic trick on the public consciousness and tricked us into believing the economy is failing.”
[LINK] for explanation
Better the money spent on social reform to improve your own country than billions of dollars invading Iraq for…?
The same reason we invaded North Africa in WWII.
oh noes he used the communist buzzword, now we must fear
Really? All I heard was WHARRGARBBLE!!!
Do you just copy and paste that comment from thread to thread?
TBH, she puts more thought into her posts than you clearly
do, arsewipe, along with blow Bama’s butt hurt wininng about
how nasty lazy people are. Usually the nasty, lazy ones, the
ones you have to kick their arse to get anything like a job out
of them are the ones who sit on their big, butter basted, ass,
while bellyaching about how lazy welfare cheats are.
Take that in the constructive sense it meant, but you’re a cretin,
and so’s your buddy…
Well, he/she IS aptly named. In response to my accused “repetitive” post, if they aren’t going to make original accusations they shouldn’t get original responses, IMO.
My apologies, good lady, that you assumed sarcasm where none existed. My point WAS that the rhetoric is so ridiculously cookie-cutter that the only appropriate response is a copy and paste job. I assumed the wordpress smiley would convey that; apparently I was wrong.
Additionally, I may be wording things not entirely appropriately, as I am ESL — 20 years ESL, but ESL all the same.
So again, apologies.
Ahhhh, you’re so cute when you’re spewing vitriol
The person with this username HAS been posting this comment a lot (seems to have to). I found that amusing, and was asking her, and not you.
And when you say my buddy, to whom are you referring? I’d really like to know, so that I can contact this person. Might it be “No one interesting?” Because I really don’t have the first idea who no one interesting would be.
You just can’t resist making a pointless comment, followed by an ellipsis, as if your pontificating is such an epiphany that the rest of us are breathlessly awaiting the continuation of your rant ….
Still dancing to my tune… figured you’d not be able to resist…
but please, continue…
….. WHARRGARBBLE!!! ……
+
Very amusing, indeed.
I see you’ve got how you sound most of the time to sane people.
That’s a long way in one day…
I should have added, to Ms. St. Clair, that I found it amusing that she had to continue posting the same comment repetitively, as she’s refuting the same rhetoric from thread to thread.
Must you interfere with even the most innocuous comment, and interpret it as inflammatory, or is that just how you amuse yourself?
My, I hit a nerve… this is fun…
Please continue trying to claim you have a point…
I’m sure I’m not the only one who finds the defence
amusing…
WHARRGARBBLE!!!
He *is* getting to you, isn’t he?
Not at all! I’m merely putting into words what I am hearing in my head
I do believe Ms. St. Clair has this one nailed, and I will be implementing her strategy post-haste!
They’ve realised they’re unoriginal cretins and are embracing it…
I think it’s cathartic moment for them… they’ve realised that the words of some no mark on the internet is pissing them off, especially when the no mark is calling the shots
-
Go on… do something mildly risible again…
Would you please tell me of whom you are asuming I am buddies, If you really believe it? I’d really like to know, so I can watch out for this person.
And again… this is SO much fun…
Do it again…
Would someone else please tell me with whom I am buddied?
+
Uncle Fester, I haven’t done anything to you other than a mild joke with a eufamism I thought was funny, so kindly refrain from commentarying so someone else can, or else be honest.
It’s actually spelled “euphamism.”
My apologies.
It’s obvious that you have been paired up with ‘no one interesting’ as you both have a similar name, and apparently the same way of thinking. I would have thought you would have been able to figure that one out.
-
You may think you haven’t done anything to Fester, but I believe your problem started when you decided to interject a comment when it really wasn’t called for (go back to the top and reread the comment you left about some poor thing getting the life choked out of it.) From that point forward you opened yourself to every bit of abuse that has been hurled your way.
I guess you were going for “euphemism”.
Thank you for your information.
I guess I am bad with subtelty because I was joking both times, and I just borrowed the name because I thought it was sort of funny.
I guess the word is you’d use is “whatever.”
Looks like France and Sweden are tied at
one each, and the US is down two…
(above @DaYaoiFan)
Ha ha, yes, it is spelled euphemism, but that might not even be the right word?
My suggestion to you, stop while you’re behind. You really aren’t helping yourself here, so you might want to just acknowledge and wait for the next lol. There is hope of redeeming yourself, but only if you let this particular train of thought fade away.
@rhorho: my secret ambition is to be a spelling troll
@no one else interesting: I wouldn’t know what word would be “right” since you’re the one that came out with it
what’s your point?
I would say he/she should work on their name as well, but I suppose we should just take troll reforming one step at a time. Last time Rho tried it she lost some vital limbs.
@DaYaoiFan: Trolls don’t have points, trolls just are. This one didn’t understand an inside joke and made an ass of himself/herself.
@Jane: do you think he/she is gonna react to your last statement by specifying his/her gender?
No, I fear some condescending version involving my fake last time and the inoffensive title of Ms. might be involved.
*time = name* I swear, some days it’s like my fingers are thinking for themselves. I did just type an extremely long summary of my reading case study, however, so my lapses aren’t surprising.
I apologize. I really do.
fake? (maybe I don’t come here often enough…)
@Jane: oh, ok (slow typing)
I see what you mean, Mr. eddiepscetti. I will be adopting this new name and I’ll be back next lol soonest!
He/she is refering to me as Ms. St.Clair, which would be like me refering to Unc as Mr. Fester or Max as Mr. Silverhammer (which I admit I sometimes do but only when he asks me in that special way of his). Point being, Jane St.Clair isn’t my real name and so refering to me as Ms. St.Clair is condenscending at best.
@ “whatever” troll: You seem to be having
trouble keeping your socks on as it is. Might
I suggest you stick to just one?
This reminds me of the infamous “clean behind the dryer” episode of ‘97. All those socks, the sights I saw can never be unseen…
@Jane: “Last time Rho tried it she lost some
vital limbs.”
It was only a flesh wound!
It’s getting better…
OMG multiple screen names, and I thought the sentence structure of the lol was confusing! Ok I guess I’ll just have to wait till I know everyone better…
@jane: I often have synapse misfires.. don’t worry though, they become more frequent with age and people around you adjust accordingly.
@DaYaoiFan: it’s ok, we’ll guide you through troll land where, at the end of the journey, you will be a troll identifying adept. Be strong and have courage, you will survive, but only if you listen to wise counsel.
@DaYaoiFan, that’s cool, it’ll actually come pretty quickly. There are a lot of weird inside jokes and old references that float around, don’t be afraid to ask if you get too confused and we’ll explain them. I think it goes without saying that when you DO ask, you shouldn’t be an ass about it, like a certain poster and his/her sock drawer has been doing today.
@Eds: Synapse misfires? Is that what they’re calling it these days?
Mr. eddiepscetti said my name needed to be changed and that I should come back next lol. Is this not sound advise?
@eddiepscetti: I will Maître. *bows respectfully*
@DYF: I officially invite you to join our merry
little band of grammar police. Your secret
code name is *whispers* Snidely Spellright.
@Eds: You’re not fooling me! You’re “senile
like a fox,” you rascal, you!!!
oh, you didn’t get the memo? I’ll get you put on the distribution list.
But Ms. Jane (is that right?) I wasn’t trying to be mean or be an ass! I was genuinely asking a question of you, if you had to do that. I”m really sorry I asked it wrong.
*sigh*
Lurk a little. Go back and read some of the old comment pages. Then start carefully….and, yes, pick a name that’s not close to someone else’s. Or whatever. Also, only use ONE name and use it consistently.
You mentioned that you’re ESL? You won’t be the only one here, but it might make some of the nuance a little more difficult.
@rho: I’ll do my best, as an ESL agent I suppose.;)
Please see this comment that I left for you.
+
http ://punditkitchen.com/2009/02/21/political-pictures-barack-obama-irs-auditor/#comment-127670
@dissimilitude: are you talking to me or No one interesting?
@DYF: I see a bright future for you here!
@everyone in the thread: don’t you just luuuuv that nesting comment system?
@eddie: I see lots of fun ahead!
@DYF: the other person.. you’re good.
@DYF: Diss was not referring to you, so
I second Eddie’s opinion, with certainty.
It’s always good when Rho backs you up.. (wink-wink,nudge-nudge)
ok
+
btw, is it really 2:50 pm in America?
It’s that time on the west coast. I’m in the
central time zone, so it’s 4:53 for me.
@DYF: Well, it might be, somewhere. I don’t know what time zone PK follows but it’s ten till six where I’m at.
9:54 am for me, but it’s tomorrow here.
You’re welcome, DaYaoiFan!
Anything for a friend.
As always, rho gives the comprehensive answer seconds before my vague attempt to help!
@Eds: You owe me a bit of lemonade and a
screen wipe…
@Eds: You mean you’re from… THE FUTURE?! Teehee. ;D
@No one interesting: uh, sure…?
+
almost midnight here, yeah my small country fits in one single time zone
I am! The numbers you need are: 12, 22, 25, 37,42 and the Poweball is 3. I’ll send you the details for the wire transfer in e-mail.
@eddie: you made me rofl!
@rho: Sorry.. *hands over a freshwipe towelette*
@Eds: I knew it! Don’t worry, your checks in the mail, which, since you’re in the future, you already have it!
@no one else interesting: the link you posted is not working.
Thank you, Ms. dissimilitude. I will definitely heed you advise.
Why are you denying me now, sweet-ums? You got what you wanted!
@jane: Thanks, the wire came through and you’re now gold in my books!
I have put it in the “URI” box, so try there, sir.
This is enough to make one un poco loco!
Do you guys always put up with this level of craziness?
I can see why you’d be defensive, then.
Couldn’t have done it without you Eds! Same time next week?
@no one: It’s “Miss”. Glad I could help.
@DYF: Obviously clicking on your name was beyond them, otherwise they would have seen in your profile you were not male.
-
@Jane: Count on it!
Did I call you Mr.? I didn’t realize I did, and I’m sorry for doing that! I’m guessing everyone’s sex based on the contents of some of their posts I have read. I guess I wont do that anymore so I won’t offend anyone. Thank you for your help, and the other poster posted the link for Jane St. Clair for me, so I hope you can read it now.
@eddie: it’s the very reason I keep a link to my dashboard in my name.
guess it’s not helping everytime.
@no one else interesting: I was talking to “no one interesting” assuming the “sir” was for my benefit. I wasn’t offended whatsoever.
@DaYaoiFan: It’s okay if you don’t like the
idea, but you may want to change your
name temporarily to DaYaoiFangirl. I think
the male image in your avatar may prompt
some more mistakes until everyone gets to
know you.
@DaYaoiFan: (See? I can learn
)I understand that, and thank you a lot! I will go and look at your dashboard now to see your profile.
@rho: maybe you’re right, but adding “girl” in my name takes the irony of it reaaaaally far.
@Mr. Probstian: sure, we’re cool
This is the longest unnested nesting I’ve seen to date.
How do I get in on it?
@ACSIS: I’m not sure. Gee, how would one
go about joining such a thing…?
That’s why I was asking. I haven’t a clue.
.
It seems that the uninteresting twins have gone away.
No. Not away. Just reading other posts and learning, as advised.
At least you know you’re uninteresting… self reflection is always a good start…
And at least you know you’re a supporating ulcer spreading infectious material. However, the “uncle” part does not seem appropriate given what seems to be your refusal to ever give in or even concede a point that you lost.
Maybe “Uber-Dictator Fester,” would be more appropriate, then?
What a time for the Wang to be out of
commission!
It’s the oxycontin suppositories that make them think that’s ‘innocuous’
I didn’t say that. Someone else did. I asked a question of Jane, and was responded to with this, and that’s what I was talking about.
TBH, she puts more thought into her posts than you clearly
do, arsewipe, along with blow Bama’s butt hurt wininng about
how nasty lazy people are . … and there’s more.
Of course you didn’t say what I quoted. I
made no such claim, either.
In your comment, you began talking about
Jane, then switched over to addressing
Unc. I see it, now that you have clarified.
Rho, dear, I know how you love your little projects, but if you keep feeding this troll it’s never going to move out from under the porch and then we’ll have to call Animal Control before it starts breeding with the neighborhood cats.
I did not do anything wrong except make a joke and word something a little wrong; I DIDN’T say that of which I was accused and I can not understand why some people are being rude just because someone else offended them by using polite “ms.” language.
I went back and read as was suggested to me to do, and here’s what I saw: most people here are happiest when they have a new person make a statement so that they can attack that person and make them go away. Lots of you here jump on that person; you interpret statements that aren’t against your beliefs as being so, so you accuse people of being underhanded when the’yre really not. It is pretty sad, really, since I thought people who said they are liberals are supposed to be open and accepting for new people and their ideals. Perhaps I am wrong there.
Jane St. Clair, there was no need to insult me. I wasn’t trying to insult you.
Oh! You’re so right, I’ve been a such a wretched b*tch taking offense when someone interjects into one of my conversations by implying that my posts are unoriginal. I feel so abashed and ashamed. I’ve seen the error of my ways, no more shall I… Aw, who am I kidding? *yanks Rho’s kibble bowl out of the bushes* No more scraps for you, troll! When I call the pound I’ll request that you’re neutered.
Yes, please remember to spay or neuter your trolls.
Feral trolls are the worst – nasty tempered things.
*huffs up because Jane always takes the troll
bait away, just when things are going nifty*
I’m just saying, don’t come crying to me for a field tourniquet when the next one nibbles your fingers off.
Why, yes, that is the truth as you see it, and now that I’ve interacted with you, thank you for being honest about the truth in yourself. Remember, I never called you that, or any, name nor did I insult you.
And I could link to where you have said that particular phrase many times; it is true that this is a joke, as I see.
One last time — I was trying to commiserate with you for having to keep repeating yourself many times over.
It is a shame that you do not see that, and I am sorry for you that you are angry.
Honestly Rho, what’d you put in this kibble, growth hormones? Maybe some of that weird plant growth stuff you use? Dear god, woman, do your experiments know no bounds? *huffs off to investigate Rho’s secret labratory*
*dashes via short-cut to evil botanical lab*
*hides evidence in the super-secure-safe*
*turns to see Jane approaching*
*initiates Jedi Mind Trick*
Hi Jane. We’re having a nice day, with no
trolls, aren’t we?
It is a shame that commenters would equate someone who did not know your rules, site-usage normals and inside jokes with someone who was denigrating your religion or politics or just being a mean spirited jerk.
If I knew making jokes was called being a troll, I’d naver have done it. From what I was reading here that was the best way to start out — make some jokes, funny commentary and then start talking about politics.
I guess that does not really work like I thought.
Now I don’t understand at all what you are saying to me, or even if you are saying it to me. It doesn’t make any sense to me, sorry.
*sigh*
@Mr. Probstian (et al.)
Stop talking.
Move on.
You’ll be fine.
@ACSIS:
OK! I will do that. Thank you.
Time will tell: You have changed your name
so that it is no longer similar to the other,
but, in the course of apologizing for the
misunderstanding, you managed to come up
with a lame excuse (that your comment was
one of commiseration).
Start over, and we’ll see how you act from
here. At least I will.
There. How does that grab you?
*is really sick of her F5 fails*
@ACSIS: You’re so succinct, it brings a tear to my eye.
@Rho: Your Jedi mind tricks do not work on me! *tries peeking behind her, sees nothing but an empty labratory with some suspicious stains on the tables* Someday you won’t be so quick, I’ll be on to your secrets then!
@Jane: Yep ACSIS was too quick for me, and
I was too quick for you!
Ironic to hide my latest experiments from
you, considering how Max commissioned
them, and all…
@Jane
Slight headache.
I’m sure I’ll be back to my verbose self by morning.
*sniffs* I feel as if Max and I have grown so distant of late…
@ACSIS: I feel it was the best course to sail in this instance. My poking-it-through-the-bars-with-a-stick-and-laughing method seemed to only be making the problem worse (and hilarious).
@Jane: Max is just busy evil-doing. Dark
Overlording is hard work, and don’t forget:
He kidnapped you because he evil-loves you.
What greater ties can bind?
Oh, and I read a book on what you’re going
through. You should start a weaving project
to stall your suitors until Max returns…
I am sorry, but I simply don’t understand what you are saying.
I guess I won’t try.
You’ll always be ‘uninteresting’ no matter
what name you use is the point they are
making, methinks…
@Rho: That just might work! Especially if I get them all drunk and undo all my work overnight…
@Jane: Update: Kill the maidens!!!
(I re-read the story. Good thing there wasn’t
anything good on TV last night!)
Regular troll with security sock is brave.
*shhhh* “They won’t know it’s me under here!” *giggle/snort*
*whispers* Oh, okay! *snicker, snicker*
Ah yes, I see it now. It should have said; Do you “have to” just …
Does that make more sense now, Ms. St. Clair?
Yes, I have to. It’s in the rules.
No, I’m still saying it wrong.
Maybe it’s “are you forced to”?
Damit I thought I was getting better at this.
Better at creating sock puppets? No, you’re not.
The jig is up! Or rather, the duo-troll is outed.
Hey, it’s just Mr. Cooper, owner of the creepy amusement park!
“Those darn meddlin’ kids..”
And I would have gotten away with it too, if it hadn’t been for you meddling PK’ers!
Ok, who wants Scooby Snacks?
*munch munch* Wha ‘ooby ‘acks are ‘ou ‘alking ’bout?
Rooby-roo!!!
Ok!
Some people are really odd and hungry for affection. I guess this would be my buddy, indeed, as it would seem.
Odd about sums it up..
On the other hand I haven’t had so much fun since I made that offensive abortion comment last weekend.
*snort*
*pretends to be offended so Jane will
perk up*
*percolates instead*
Wat? Abortions for percocet?
Is that like toys for guns?
What’s the difference between a pig’s after birth and an abortion?
You can’t gargle with a pig’s afterbirth…
vodka
spearmint oil
tincture of myrrh
eucalyptus oil
1 pig placenta
green food dye if desired
(Note: if you prefer, you can substitute 3 aborted fetuses for the 1 pig placenta)
.
Place all ingredients in blender and blend on med. high for 3 minutes.
Strain through cheesecloth.
That’s disgusting!
Why would you bruise good Vodka?
And what about the garnish?
*tsk, tsk*
Garnish for mouthwash?
OT, I found some relatives of yours [link]
And here I was, looking for another cocktail
recipe…
I LOVE the picture! Is it okay for me to use
it as my summer avatar?
BTW, my daisy’s “smile” was made by a
caterpillar. He was quite an arteest! He was
working on another flower (doing an abstract
piece) when I discovered this one.
I’m confused…if you hate the guy so much, why does your username indicate that you want to blow him?
Is it some type of love/hate psychodrama?
self loathing, butter basted ass, wannabe-welfare fraudster…
helluva catch for someone at their church…
*taps Fester on the shoulder*
Just poking at them with a stick…
I’m not really confused.
*hands diss a shorter stick*
-
If you’re really a thrill seeker, try that one on!
-
*let the fun ensue*
She’ll need a chemical resistant apron if she gets *that*
close, Eds. You know, for the spew and all.
Heck, “blow” is in his name, even…
LOL! Point made..
Anyone got a hazmat suit? Or a full-body condom?
…with a lead apron, just in case?
Sorry, mine was ruined at the last troll-fest..
Oh, that’s right…the one with the soldering
iron did that apron a mischief…
I’ll say! The entire crotch area was burned away..
Good thing you’ve got harbles of steel, or
that could have been life altering…
I knew that, but I wasn’t going to miss another chance to smack him with a rip bar a few times…
Yeah, I really hate it when my president wants to invest in our country’s future, rather than effing with big toys on foreign soil.
Yeah, I really hate it when my president listens to people and actively
seeks to repair and salvage what’s left of our country.
Yeah, I really hate it when my president listens to His party and his party only and actively seeks to repair dead socialist programs and salvage what’s left of marxism at large.
FXT for accuracy.
Still doing the tired Jesus thing and throwing references to
socialism and Marxism around like you have a clue, I see.
WHARRGARBBLE from BattleCry: What a shock!!! *yawns*
Well, when the the hammer and sickle fit….they aren’t just buzzwords.
Tell me, when Bush wanted to spend billions in Iraq and in international corporations, did you blink?
I love that when we start investing in our own country, it’s called socialism.
Jon Stewart was right.
I know a fun game! Why don’t we ask Mister Bob exactly how Bush
didn’t lead our troops needlessly to slaughter? I would love to hear another
meaningless justification for that quagmire.
Bob seems to believe that changing the “American” destruction of our own, tackling the problems within the black community, and seeking to soften
the hit our nation faces economically is somehow bad for us.
Mwen, perhaps you can help me. I’m having trouble understanding Bob.
For starters, exactly *what* needs to stay the same???
Spending monies on teh BOMBS is so much more fun and kewl than spending them on stiff old schools, and health care and Boring Stuff That Don’t Go Boom. Duh.
And schools and healthcare policies don’t fill Bush and Cheney wallets.
Just the NEA’s….they, and the teachers unions are so large a pig at the trough no one else can get to the feed.
The O&G and Pharmy lobbyists are starving! Oh noes!!!
Preach on, oh Blithering Idiot!
Not to mention war’s amazingly effective to take people’s mind off real problems.
Well, the schools did a great job of educating Dub, right? Why would we need more money there?
DURRR! He went to a private boarding academy, not a publicly funded high school. Is your brain even turned on?
And did you get into Yale? Jealous, much?
Spell it with me, rtard “O-c-c-i-d-e-n-t-a-l-i-s-n-o-t-i-v-y-l-e-a-g-u-e.”
Liberal drillhole.
Yikes! I surely was not trying to piss someone off with my comment. Sorry to have offended you so deeply!
Consider the source. S/he was born pissed off, and is still
quite achy with post-election butt hurt. Nothing to see
there, so… *shrugs.*
Most of us didn’t have fathers who could lay used $5 bills down until Yale said ‘Yes, Massa Bush’…
Psh. Silly infrastructure.
Money is for WARS!
Actually, since the Americans have a nasty habit of charging the people they ‘liberate’ (or ‘help’ in wars) it’s more ‘business by other means’
Ok, let’s analyze what you just said. “Invest in America”. In order to call it investing, there has to be an expected return. Now, not all returns are monetary. In Government there is a thing called social return. For example, as a society we benefit greatly from people receiving a good education. It leads to less crime, higher pay, better quality of life etc etc.
However, this spending package does not assure any kind fo return, economic or otherwise. The TARP package did nothing to stem the downturn in the economy and it was actually applied to the wound directly. It wasn’t 4 billion dollars going to a pool for entities like ACORN which is about as valiant as the French in front of a German advance.
There is no real return coming from this money. It is totally temporary and the long term effects of it will be far more devestating than any good it will do in the short term.
The following is from Fact Check, linked behind my name.
McCain: The ACORN Fables
In another attempt to paint groups and people with whom Obama has some connection in as unsavory a light as possible, McCain has gone after the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. And we’ve gone after him, for an ad accusing the group of “massive voter fraud” and for saying in the final presidential debate that ACORN is “now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric of democracy.”
Both claims are breathtakingly inaccurate. There’s a huge difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud. And while ACORN, which hires part-time, $8-an-hour canvassers to go door-to-door and register people to vote, has had widespread problems with phony registrations invented by employees who don’t want to work, the problem has never been that it sent people to the polls using bogus identities or to vote in any other fraudulent manner. Even the Republican prosecutor of the largest ACORN case to date said the shenanigans of ACORN workers were “not intended to permit illegal voting.”
To be sure, Obama’s interactions with the group have been greater than he has let on. But whether those ties can accurately be called “long and deep,” as McCain’s ad claims, is highly questionable.
ACORN, itself, separated questionable voter registration forms, and
turned them in FLAGGED as such. Your effort to equate ACORN
with corruption indicates your lack of motivation to know the truth of the matter. You don’t question anything you hear that is consistent with
what you *want* to hear, and it shows. Very little is as black and white
as you wish it to be.
(laughing helplessly) You guys ROCK.
With as many folks being caught owing taxes, I wouldn’t be against mandatory tax checks on them every year. No wonder we come up so short on taxes.
If Obama keeps nominating people, the Government will probably get enough in unpaid taxes to counter the stimulus plan.
I think you’ll find the people have already paid the back taxes, interest and penalties…
So, that was just another ‘The stupid! It burns!’ comments one expects from the terminally ill informed…
Or… it was a joke, you humorless moron.
Man… that caption had nothing to do with the picture, at all.
If it were a little more clever, the hating wouldn’t seem as blatant.
Still funny.
No, it’s really not. It’s poorly phrased, has nothing to do with the photo and is not even close to witty, funny or clever.
But other than that, yeah, it’s a riot.
If you’re such a connoisseur of great wit, where’s yours? Hmmmm?
Go make something funny instead of crying about how these aren’t.
Show me yours and I’ll show you mine.
It’s not that funny, sock…
This “lol” (using the term quite loosely) must be the illustration next to the text definition of “meh”.
that caption makes no sense. im still scratching my head trying to figure out what he’s trying to say.
It took me a bit to decide whether it was really offensive or not because I couldn’t figure out what it meant. I feel it suffers from grammar clarity fail. The way I see it is they are saying that everyone Obama nominated for things had not paid back taxes, but did once they were nominated. So, if he keeps nominating, all of the people who owe back taxes will eventually “pay up.”
The grammar is not just unclear, it’s just plain wrong. SICK AND WRONG, I tell you. ;p
The process is:
1. Don’t pay taxes.
2. Get informed that you’re being considered for nomination.
3. Pay your unpaid taxes.
4. Get nominated.
5. Media looks into your tax history.
6. Scandal.
7. ????
8. Profit.