Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

ADAM’S APPLE



Ann Coulter

ADAM’S APPLE
That damn sure ain’t a banana!

(Ann Coulter)

picture: RamonaQ. lol caption: heatherjlc

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 254 Comments

  1. Austin says:

    I can’t laugh at her–she’s too scary.

    • lowly grunt says:

      EEK!!!!!!!!

      • lowly grunt says:

        AHHH!!! She’s all over the page!!!!

        • Captain Wow says:

          I noticed that too. I was a little scared.

          • Uncle Fester says:

            I’ve handled scarier than her… of course, they had no limbs and were in the top ten deadliest snakes in the world, but I’ve handled worse…

            • ubr says:

              oh yes, mighty fester the snake wrangler… how many poisonous snakes are there in britain?

              • Literal says:

                Wrong country, silly. St. Patrick was from Ireland …

              • He has traveled while in the military. So he has seen foreign lands.

              • AC says:

                One species, I think. Just adders…

              • Uncle Fester says:

                If you must know, the Krait was in an amiable mood, since it
                was daylight, and by the feel of it, it had recently fed. That’s
                called ‘blind luck’
                -
                The coral snake was actually a friendly little chap, who
                seemed to appreciate the body heat as I moved him into
                bushes… although peeling him off without upsetting him gave
                me pause…
                -
                You got a problem, Gobshite?

                • ubr says:

                  yes, the internet tough guy…
                  .
                  pray tell us what possessed you to pick up a coral snake in the first place? your stories of how you did this and did that ring hollow after all the times i’ve heard you rip into other people on this very forum for posting similar tales…

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    *shrug*
                    same way anyone picks up a snake… just behind the head.
                    and the reason I picked it up was because it was better than killing it, which the drama queens I was with wanted to. The Krait was a more dangerous prospect than the Coral, but it was asleep, recently fed and docile. Coral’s are pretty good natured for snakes.
                    -
                    As to ‘tough’… by 18th century standards, I’m quite
                    frighteningly butch… does that count?
                    -
                    I can’t help you being a retard, you sorry data puncher to a loan shark…

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      As an addendum
                      I’d not move a constrictor with anything other than a long stick…
                      The don’t strike, they try and wrap…

                    • rhorho says:

                      I totally hate that! As soon as most people see a
                      snake, they think “Kill it!” Snakes do a great job
                      in keeping insects and rodents under control, and
                      most of them will leave, if they’re not cornered.

                      • Aedriel says:

                        I always got in trouble when I was a kid for picking them up to play with them out in the woods. They kept telling me I was going to get bitten. They wer all harmless :( silly adults…

                        My good friend has a 12′ Burmese Python, he’s teenaged so he’s kind of an arse… if he’s having a bad day he’ll wrap your arm… once he bit her in the face while she was asleep, so she shuts him in a different room when she goes to bed

                        /ramble

                        • rhorho says:

                          Non-venomous snakes will bite, and it doesn’t
                          tickle. Most of the time, it’s best to leave them
                          to conduct their little snaky business alone.

                          Your friend is lucky that she got away with a
                          bite. I hope she keeps him well-fed.

                        • Aedriel says:

                          She takes excellent care of him. She got photos of the aftermath, it wasn’t pretty. I can only imagine waking up to see the throat of a snake over your eyes. She’s fairly sure she turned and hit him in her sleep.

                          She’s much, much more careful now.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Pythons are usually reasonably good
                          natured… a 12′ could probably dislocate
                          your elbow it it was seriously constricting, if
                          not completely disarticulate it…

                        • rhorho says:

                          It’s good that she learned her lesson before
                          he got any bigger. She probably shouldn’t
                          handle him alone. Do you know how much
                          he weighs now?

                        • Aedriel says:

                          Well, he’s a typical teenager – moody, irritable… he does it to express himself (so we assume – perhaps we give him too much credit). He’s never actually hurt anyone, just turned hands purple and scared the sh*t out of some.

                        • Aedriel says:

                          I think he weighs about as much as she does, actually. She’s a very tiny person. She seems to do fine with him, though.

                        • rhorho says:

                          @Aedriel: I’m glad you caught my faux pas
                          there. Sundays are usually slow posting, so
                          I don’t refresh like I should.

                          Your friend should begin to think about
                          having someone around when she handles
                          him. As Unc said, they’re usually docile,
                          but it only takes one time for her to get
                          hurt.

  2. Kraas says:

    phear the madam’s apple

  3. Not a Troll says:

    So . . . she’s a man? I’m sorry, but that kind of seems like grasping at straws to me.

    • Paul says:

      Comments about her gender are certainly jumping the gun, since we’re not even quite sure what phylum she belongs to.

      • lowly grunt says:

        LOL! I suggest arthropoda.

        And as someone else somewhere else on this thread pointed out, she uses her appearance as a marketing tool (heh, tool) so her looks are fair game.

        • Paul says:

          She uses her appearance as a marketing tool? Good god.

          That reminds me of that scene in the BBC “Planet Earth” series, in the “caves” episode, when they discover an underground mountain of bat droppings being picked over by about a billion cockroaches. There’s no accounting for taste, I guess.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Since you socked me the other day, I’d say you were a troll, cretin.

  4. Uncle Fester says:

    It’s not an adam’s apple. It’s the elbow of a parasitic conjoined twin…

  5. Jexxa says:

    Of all the things wrong with this woman, people are making fun of her appearance? srsly?

    • Uncle Fester says:

      It doesn’t stop Rush Limbaugh et al… so one can only assume it’s ok…

      One only has to look at the political weight that ‘hur… hurr… Michelle is ugly… hurrrr’ has from the right…
      Doesn’t help Coulter is still sold as a ‘babe’ by some, when she’s less mutton dressed as lamb and more a grinning sheep’s skull on a desolate moor remembering pretending it’s still alive…

  6. Rikoche says:

    How very _dare_ you compare this witch to the many fine and upstanding transgendered persons of my acquaintance? Pah, I say, pah.

    • AnnaBanana says:

      I find irony in it, due to the fact that Ann Coulter is one who loves to rail against things she disagrees with, including homosexuality. Yes, I’m aware that many transsexuals consider themselves homosexual following life transition and surgery, but even those who do not still are included in “the community” because the gay community, for the most part, embraces trans-persons as one of their own.

      Thus, by inferring that Ann is a transsexual, she is being placed into a group she has such serious disdain for. Personally, I don’t like considering her as part of the human race, much less as a woman.

      • chuckles says:

        “because the gay community, for the most part, embraces trans-persons as one of their own.”

        Actually, some of the most rabid anti- trans women hate speech comes from gay notables like Barney Frank, Julie Bindel, and just about any Second Wave lesbian feminist.

        And then of course, there was that whole business where gay pundits were trying to justify abandoning transfolk with ENDA, SONDA, and a whole slew of other gay special rights legislation.

        Wasn’t it a lesbian feminist who said trans people shoyld be “morally mandated out of existence?”
        Yes.

  7. Captain Wow says:

    A little off topic but doesn’t she kind of (and I by no means am saying this as an insult to him) resemble Ralph Fiennes? From the nose up?

  8. Elsie says:

    That’s not an adam’s apple.. i have a slight bulge in my neck too. She probably just has a bony neck… like me.

  9. deseeded says:

    I wonder if her vagina has a set of testicles…

  10. Steve says:

    Take one of the most vapid, obnoxious, and outright idiotic women on the planet and the best we can do is make fun of her physical appearance?
    -
    WTF?

    • ubr says:

      seconded. she’s annoying and crazy, but still people would rather insult her on a basic level then expend any effort to really debase her…

      • You ever take notice of how some things are just so big you can’t really see it? I consider Anne to be like Godzilla and her appearance like grafitti on his foot. It is much easier to deride the graffiti on the foot than it is to attack Godzilla on any realistic grounds. So people go the path of least resistance.

        On a creature that banal to intelligent thought, where exactly do you start once you break the surface of her skeletal exterior?

        • ubr says:

          i guess i just wanted something more than skin deep…

          • Literal says:

            But … she’s mostly skin and bones, so I *guess* I’ll try to make a *bone* joke next time … oh, nevermind. ;)

          • Try a stun gun to the heart. Even my best crack at Coulter was calling her a reptile, which is only a tiny notch above beauty comments. I might as well call her a doodie head. We can debate Coulter because that can go in depth but comedy that has to be explained usually isn’t funny.

      • jim says:

        because what she says is usually the truth, whether people believe it’s venomous or not. so since they cant attack her ideas, they attack her. She says things to that are going to get a reaction. when she talks about the 911 widows she is referring to the fact that these women went public and made political statements which then opened them up to criticism on their views but the left did what they always do and put victims out there to make political statements and then say that if you attack their views you are heartless because they are victims after all. Ann doesnt play that game so she comes across as cruel.

        but while i really enjoy the Lolcats , the lol politics extremely one sided and very leftist every “joke” is conservative bad nd Liberal great, I’d love to see one of these jokes mocking Obama in some way other than making a joke about how wonderful and terrific he is, i hav eyet to see one putting him or his wife down. and I love how people call her anti-american that is just ridiculous you guys probably think Bill Maher is a great Patriot.

        • Danbala says:

          There is no Truth.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          You mean like Al Franken supported terrorists? That sort of ‘truth’?
          -
          Lying about when the NYT reported an event? That sort of ‘truth’?
          -
          Lying about the paternity of Evan Thomas? That sort of truth?
          -
          “Liberals hate all religions except Islam”? That sort of truth?
          -
          I could continue, but filling a page with a Coulter gaffe and then the question “That sort of truth?” is dull
          -
          Coulter wouldn’t know ‘truth’ if it bit her bony lying ass…

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Oh, lighten up… the woman makes anorexics go ‘Girl! You SKINNY!’ and she’s hard faced too…

    • Paul says:

      Take one of the most rabid anti-American media stars in the country and the best you can do is point to her vapidity, obnoxiousness, and idiocy?

  11. Anniee451 says:

    Palin/Rice 2012 (maybe 2016) with Coulter for Attorney General. Hottest administration EVAH!

    I’m noticing in the upcoming stuff that no one seems to understand those “KKK” guys are PETA members being the filthy pigs that they are?

    • Uncle Fester says:

      That sounds a social conservative wet dream. I’d not expect fiscal responsibility, decline in the size of government nor repealing of the ‘Patriot Act’ under that hellish ensemble…

      Have you been taking oxycontin and reading Leviticus again?

    • I thought they might be from what I could see of their flyers.

    • ubr says:

      i figured as much considering they were trying to roast the akc…

    • IowaSucks says:

      why yes, yes they are.
      [linky-thing]

    • PortlandMark says:

      [LINK]

      The PETA ad in question.

      Are you against PETA’s goals, or do you just find the KKK imagery to be too hateful to be a used as a tool? Maybe you think PETA is actually promoting the KKK’s goals?

      Myself, I think that once again, PETA shows a marked lack of understanding of the realities of the situation; after all, there wouldn’t be any dogs left if they weren’t bred by humans. Heck, in the USA, there are hardly any wolves left in the lower 48! Biologists in the Northwest are excited because they’re pretty sure there’s around 200 wolves in the states of Montana and Idaho, and this shows a marked growth for the species.

      I disagree with most of PETA’s extreme views, but I find them harmless. I’m glad they’re there holding up the extreme end of their particular spectrum. Society needs the freaks to keep us going.

      • lowly grunt says:

        Hence, Ann Coulter.

        EEEKKKK!!!

      • charro says:

        I don’t think they meant breeding in general, but the breeding people do to get these “pure pedigrees”. There’s a lot of incest that goes/went into the purebreeding and now they have things like hip dysplasia in some breeds of dogs. It’s (IMO) cruel to the animals to breed them for looks, or for show, or for whatever it is rich people do to have prize winning dogs. I don’t have a problem with people breeding dogs, but it seems unecessarily cruel to subject a life (any life) to all those risks for something so trivial.
        It’s just something I’ll never understand. I have a mutt and he is the sweetest dog ever and he is very cute. [LINK] I just don’t understand the point of showdogs. I’d much rather save a mutt from the pound than spend ridiculous amounts of money on a dog for show.
        Though I do understand the point you make about their extreme views. I’m just a big softie when it comes to animals.

        • Danbala says:

          Hear, hear and HEAR. Goal-oriented breeding can be great – but I can’t understand the ethics behind breeding for a particular look when it means making the health and well-being of the animal is in jeopardy. That’s just nasty, imo.

          • Danbala says:

            Pz 2 ignore mah grammar. :p

          • charro says:

            People are cruel cruel cruel beings.
            Off topic, but I was watching the hIstory Channel – Cities of the Underground – and they were in Turkey. I caught it at the part where they were under this huge bath house and were talking about the slaves they used to run it, and I just started thing “My god, we really are a horrible creature”. Slavery was the norm up until the very recent past of humankind. To subject people to things like slavery and torture (which was also stopped very recently – relatively speaking) is just… disgusting. And shameful. And so many other things that just will not fit in here. Countries still do it. It is very sad and sometimes when I see or think about all the things humans have done to themselves, other species and the planet.. all for selfish reasons (progress, bah!) makes me ashamed to be a human. *sigh*
            /end I hate people rant.

            • Danbala says:

              Yeah.
              I just wish people would own up and admit to themselves that they, mostly, are enablers to rotten systems. And yes, I am one myself, as I will buy meat even though I don’t know that it’s locally bred, raised and slaughtered. I suck at that. :p
              I’ve seized to be amazed at what some people will do – such as owning/buying/selling slaves. I am more sad about everyone else going “Hmm, it happens in another place, so it’s an SEP.”
              (Somebody Else’s Problem)

            • Uncle Fester says:

              We technically still use slavery… who do you think makes $5 jeans?

        • PortlandMark says:

          Well, it’s certainly true that any mutt is smarter than most purebreeds, I’ll give you that.

          Except Border Collies. Somehow, they just keep getting smarter and smarter.

    • Paul says:

      Er, are you suggesting that Coulter is “hot”? Ann Coulter?

      You might want to check with human beings on that one. I think you’ll find that no member of our species agrees with you on it.

  12. cretarta says:

    I would like to make slow passionate love to Coulter. She’s probably a demon in the sack.

  13. Literal says:

    After which she would bite off your head and eat it.

  14. Jahwio says:

    Women do have an adam’s apple too. Sorry to tell you guys but this might only be A) anorexia or B) a hormone disorder :)

  15. Seriousfail says:

    Wow, serious sexist, bigoted fail on the creators part. Not to mention completely unoriginal since people have been using that as a bashing tool for about 6 years now

    • Literal says:

      Why? I assumed that IS an adam’s apple, and it ISN’T a banana.
      -
      Your filthy little mind did the rest.

      • Seriousfail says:

        Riiiiight. “Are those grapes in your eye sockets or are you just flirting with me?”
        The author failed. She knows she failed. If you want to bash her for being a f#@$ loon fine but the trans thing is old not funny and childish.

        • Literal says:

          I AM the author, you insufferable twit.
          -
          It’s LOL politics. If you can’t handle having your whackadoodle idol joked about, don’t look.
          -
          You are indeed the one with the dirty mind. I said nothing sexist in the least.

          • Seriousfail says:

            Sex-IST not sex-UAL you moron.
            Damn you really are stupid!
            The best you can do with her is to pick on her looks?
            Try listening to her words sometime and you will have plenty to pick on.

            • Literal says:

              I said SEXIST, not SEXUAL. You may filthy mind read the word wrong, and you may want to go back to my comment and read it without rage eyes.
              What’s sexist about pointing out someone’s adam’s apple isn’t a banana?
              Did I call her a tranny? NO! You did.
              Idjit.

              • Literal says:

                *filthy mind may

                • froofrou says:

                  I think the Adam’s apple comment was taken as referring to Coulter as male, or otherwise NOT FEMALE, hence the confusion. It’s rare to refer to a woman’s Adam’s apple, as on a woman it’s so small as to be non-existent. So, whoever this was is taking your words as sexist. Which is logical, based on the caption.

                  • Literal says:

                    Ah, yes, froufrau, I agree, but the beauty is that YOUR mind has to take you there — I can’t force you to the conclusion that Anne is a transvestite: I’m just pointing out the obvious, that her adam’s apple isn’t a banana! ;)

              • Seriousfail says:

                Which are you, too stupid or too dishonest to admit that you were making a tranny joke?

                Which are you, too stupid or too dishonest to admit that your ‘filthy mind’ and ‘dirty mind’ comments are sex-UAL, not sex-IST comments?

                • Literal says:

                  Why are you so rabid about it? Are you pre- or post-operative?
                  -
                  Otherwise, your mind took you there. Feel free to cry about it some more, and I’ll continue to enjoy how much you obviously hate me for poking fun at what is obviously a woman who purports to be attractive as an element of her schtick.

                  • Seriousfail says:

                    So then your answer would be both too stupid AND too dishonest.
                    Thanks
                    Now be gone, before somebody drops a house on you too.
                    Oh wait. I meant the word that starts with a ‘b’ not the one that starts with a ‘w’

                    • Literal says:

                      Oh yeah, I’m a stoopid liiiaar, and you’re a ridiculous care troll.
                      I tremble in terror at your house threat. Drop it on me, it’s not like you’d get my ruby slippers: you’d have to be an actual girl. Drop that house, tranny!
                      And I’m a bitch for pointing out obviosity. Keep crying over the fact you were born “different.” I’d have some respect for you if you’d just out youself and be honest rather than throwing a care-troll fit over a LOL.
                      Say something relevant that begins with “b”.
                      I eagerly await your response.

                      • PdeV says:

                        Are you always this vile of a human being or did you just lose a child or something? You seem to have an amazing about of hate and self-loathing. Why else would you lash out so hatefully to someone who is critiquing your art? You seem to think you have wit and that it makes it ok. You don’t and it doesn’t. You obviously need the attention up here to make up for the lack of love in your life so I won’t try to deprive you of that. Everybody needs to feel loved. I’m just very sorry for you that this is the only place you can get it. Maybe if you washed that acid out of your system, you might not destroy all the real people.

                        • Literal says:

                          Is this a joke?
                          Otherwise, yep, I am a vile human being full of self-consuming vitriol.
                          Cry about it for me, willya?
                          Sheesh.
                          Crawl back under your bridge.

                      • lowly grunt says:

                        “obviosity” is going into my lexicon. Thanks, Literal!

                    • Grumpy Curmugeon says:

                      Thanks. The overwhelming vitriol and over-reaction of your diatribe was so intense, I connected my jumper-leads to the screen, and recharged my plug-in hybrid. I won’t need to add petrol till April!

                      • Literal says:

                        I think it’s Anne’s’s mom. Or her shemale lover.
                        Meh. Who cares! Glad to be of service for the betterment of the planet!
                        :lol:

                        • Could be Anne. The level of vitriol and hatred seems about right and the poster seems to be Taking It Personally.

                          So, hey, if it is, a word for you — stop making people think all conservative
                          women are hateful raging idiots. It would be appreciated.

                        • To clarify, that last was to Anne should she actually be our troll. ;-)

  16. Laughing at life! says:

    Best. Uniting-divisive. LOL. EVAH!
    *
    Libtards hate it because it’s sexist and bigoted and anti-woman and/or tranny. Rethugs hate it because it’s dissing their self-purported pundit goddess.
    *
    Everyone’s totally confabulated about whether to side with Coulter’s wyminism as an ism or Coulter as a an ism representative of conservativism!
    *
    Total and complete f*ck with everyone’s worldview WIN!

    • rhorho says:

      Either that, or it’s just another LOL. Extreme much? ;-)

      • Laughing at life! says:

        Nah. I just love seeing everyone unite under conflicting ideals!
        *
        “Wait … whut? Sexism … but against Anne Coulter … wait, whut? Messing with Anne Coulter but saying it’s sexist and wymynistic … wait, whut???”
        *
        A confused — this lol gives you one!
        *
        But it is just another lol, and the best part is too many people getting rabid and taking it too seriously.
        HAH!

        • rhorho says:

          This LOL doesn’t give me a confused, any more than any of the other
          LOLs similar to it. Here’s the same topic, covered March of last year.

          (Link under my name)

      • Laughing at life! says:

        Oh yeah, I jsut noticed — that’s why it’s exactly 2.5 on the ratings — think about it. That’s just further evidence of my point exactly.

        *
        Fundamental ideology struggle WIN!
        Truly hilarious!

        • rhorho says:

          The low ratings may be due to the overworked topic. Ann is well-worn
          material.

          [LINK] to the best Ann Coulter LOL evAH!

        • rhorho says:

          (PK keeps eating my posts. It’s not liking links, suddenly.)

          Anyway, the low ratings on this one may be a result of Ann Coulter
          being a tired topic on PK. Since I can’t link, if you search “coulter,”
          one LOL begins with “So wait, if…”. To me, that’s the funniest one
          evAH!

          :lol:

          • Literal says:

            Well, hell, rhorho. I know this reply is to someone else, but I just clicked your links, and I wasn’t around to catch those original lols.
            No need to defend myself regarding my opinion on the woman, other than to say she’s bat- and bug-s*it crazy all rolled into one lithium- and vodka-chugging skeletal package, but I made this LOL without prior knowledge of others pointing out that particular feature. I tend to go for the lowest common denominator regarding what’s obvious.
            Thanks.

            • froofrou says:

              Nice that you’re giving the woman the rep for ‘chugging vodka and lithium’ without any proof. Nice. Very classy.

              • Literal says:

                I only wish I had that kind of power with the MSM ;)
                Kidding. If I had that kind of power, I’D be the one being joked about.
                Don’t worry too much about sullying Anne’s rep. If it’ll make you feel better, I think Arianna Huffington is a tequila and ‘lude popping whackjob who blows donkies at a naughty circus sideshow for dope money.
                But what do I know?

                • Literal says:

                  Oh, and Anne’s ultimate revenge is all the topic-specific advertising that’s popping up now on this webswite because I created a LOL about her and it appeared on the front page. And the newbs who have never read her before are increasing the traffic on her website.
                  -
                  Any publicity is good publicity … capitalism, baby!

  17. ptrance^raYn says:

    Republican or not. If she was a guy before (as is transsexual), then leave her be.
    If she has an hormone disorder or something else, leave her be.
    Questioning her political opinions, you can do but stuff like this is just insulting and stupid.

    Lamest lol I’ve seen for a while.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Based on her comments about the GLBT community, I’d suggest a big steaming cup of STFU. The steam of the one can complement the steam off what you dropped just there… fckwit!

  18. kat says:

    What a vile “wo-man” >_<

  19. TheCake says:

    That picture should go under “Being a human FAIL”.

  20. mehhhhhhh says:

    Stupid posts like these show how this site is biased against intelligent conservative people who make valid points ..

    • Literal says:

      And right below your complaint is an Anne Coulter ad.
      -
      G’won. Ask her if it bothers her to have her hard-earned advertisement dollars well-justified by those who take offense to this and thus click the link below.
      -
      Anne’s not crying about it, so why are you?

    • slan agat says:

      I have nothing against intelligent conservatives who make valid points.

      I do, however, have quite a bit against Ann Coulter.

  21. slan agat says:

    And I still would NOT fnck Ann Coulter. [LINK]

  22. lowly grunt says:

    But this link right here at the bottom of the page says she’s FREE!

    Horror, trauma, weeping and gnashing of teeth is going for NOTHING these days?

    Wow, the economy really is in the toilet if Ann’s just giving it away….

  23. cheezy says:

    i dont care what she is she is kinda hot

  24. RedstarChimera says:

    I have to object in the strongest possible terms! Comparing us trannies to her is just plain insulting!

  25. tigerlily says:

    hehe, mAnn Coulter

  26. Fester'sMom says:

    Personal insults on Ann Coulter: Because we just hate her, but we can’t come up with any good comebacks to what she says.

    Say why don’t we attack her personal appearance or say that she’s a man, or just call her filthy names, then everyone will understand Ann Coulter is wrong and we must be right.

    • Sproggie says:

      God! Lighten up! She’s an unattractive woman who packages herself as a beauty, so she’s opened HERSELF up to this kind of ridicule.

    • Says the person lacking the testicular or ovarian fortitude to come up with a personalized name instead of stating they are an obvious troll. Let alone that you are just insulting those giving insults instead of giving any kind of counter information.

      You could go into the fact that she calls anybody a f@g who dares not agree with her. Or you could go into the fact that she spouts off hairbrained ideas that would only end up with her own boney @ss as a broodmare for the government. Hell, you could even go into how she constantly makes inflammatory statements without any kind of substance.

      Oh wait, that is my stance. I suppose I am expecting you to actually say something counter to that instead of just proving why she is an object of ridicule by being one yourself…

  27. Lance E Sloan says:

    Looking for a banana? Check her pockets!


Your Comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    Ash on 50. cals and an ipod
    Eddie the Floydist on Vladurday: My name?
    bad fairie on Vladurday: My name?
    flodnak on Vladurday: My name?
    Eddie the Floydist on Vladurday: My name?
    n00bs on TIANANMEN SQUARE
    mej on Vladurday: My name?
    n00bs on TIANANMEN SQUARE
    kg333 on Vladurday: My name?
    Eddie the Floydist on TIANANMEN SQUARE
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz