Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

What the Government bail-out



Scooter Libby

What the Government bail-out should have looked like!

(Karl Rove)

PS. Thanks for the heads up PKers! We’re pretty good about catching Photoshop jobs most of the time, but not all of the time.

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: darthvenom17

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 228 comments

  1. Fred says:

    Meh…. 1/5.

    • Literal says:

      Agreed. Ack!
      We wants teh funneh!

      • Matador says:

        Also, this is Karl Rove, not Scooter Libby

        Also, also, this is photoshopped.

        • Stephen says:

          It’s not even a good photoshopping… Karl Rove is noticeably chubbier. ;)

          however, even if it weren’t photoshopped, not only would it still not make cents, but it’s still not a funny caption. …and I’m certainly not a Karl Rove fan.

          Perhaps if it were a picture of Paulson getting dragged away in cuffs?

          I usually find the least funny of these at least mildly amusing. Unfortunately this just doesn’t have it.

          • Militant Moderate says:

            Pfeh. Photoshop talent wasted.

            Now if they’d have been able to pull it off with Anne Coulter, THAT would be much more impressive (from an artistic standpoint, of course).

          • Matador says:

            Actually I thought it was pretty clever and amusing, despite the ’shop, even though I could be accused of being a Right Wing Conspirator.

    • jwd says:

      srlsly, you guys won. give it a rest. there’s such a thing as sore winners too…

  2. Fred says:

    Arresting them wouldn’t really have helped. And what’s with people and their desire for revenge? Its not like they did anything illegal or anything?

    • pittypat says:

      The Republican base is furious. They are saying it is wrong to convict someone
      of perjury and obstruction of justice unless there is proof of an underlying blow job. –Bill Maher

    • Siava says:

      REVENGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Matador says:

      Idiots in congress urged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on, saying there was no problem. There were warnings then of what would happen. Here we are a few years later with evidence of accounting fraud on behalf of these government funded mortgage giants, and the same idiots point fingers at the free market and say we need more government control. Sounds pretty illegal to me. Barney Frank is at the top of my list of America’s Most Wanted.

      • PortlandMark says:

        I’m pretty tired of righties trying to blame this mess on poor homeowners. The below from Wiki on Barney Frank:

        In September 2003, Frank, then the ranking Democrat on the Republican-led Financial Services Committee, opposed Bush administration proposals for transferring oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac by creating an independent agency to supervise. “The administration’s proposal, which was endorsed in large part … by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, would not repeal the significant government subsidies … [it] does not alter the implicit guarantee that Washington will bail the companies out … Nor would it remove the companies’ exemptions from taxes and antifraud provisions of federal securities laws.” The proposal would have moved oversight from Congress and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to the new agency. Frank stated in 2003, “The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”[40] Frank stated that the bill would potentially “[weaken] the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing”.[40]

        Conservative groups have criticized Frank for campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ($42,350 between 1989 and 2008). They further claim the donations influenced his support of their lending programs, and they have partially blamed Frank for not playing a stronger role in reforming Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the years leading up to the Economic crisis of 2008.[41][42] In addition, Frank’s former partner, Herb Moses, was an executive at Fannie from 1991 to 1998, where Moses helped develop many of Fannie’s affordable housing and home improvement lending programs. In 1991, Frank pushed for reduced restrictions on two- and three-family home mortgages.[43] Frank and Moses’ relationship ended around the same time Moses left the company; Frank’s support of Fannie and Freddie predated and continued past that relationship.[44]

        Frank has responded that he “opposed right-wing efforts to put Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac out of business, while simultaneously supporting strong regulation” and “voted against the [2005 reform] bill in protest of those restrictions, while making it clear that I was for the reforms it otherwise contained.”[45] Lawrence B. Lindsey, former chief economic adviser to then-President Bush, states that Frank “is the only politician I know who has argued that we needed tighter rules that intentionally produce fewer homeowners and more renters.”[46]

        • Matador says:

          Nice copy-paste, but if you were responding to me I’m pretty sure I never once mentioned homeowners in my post. I called out CEOs Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson for accounting fraud as well as Barney Frank for denying there was even corruption to begin with.

  3. hissy says:

    I want to see this in real life.

    • truthtold says:

      Me too, except with Barney Frank instead.

      • mothergoose says:

        I’m still hoping for a Bush/Cheney warcrimes perp walk…unfortunately don’t think it’ll happen…

      • Scum says:

        You want to see Barney Frank in handcuffs? Ooo, kinky.

      • Forge says:

        For the horrific crime of… getting reelected by his constituency again and again for the last 28 years? He must be doing *something* right.

        • froofrou says:

          You CAN fool some of the people all of the time, after all.

          • Scum says:

            I agree 100%. Just look at religion for the proof.

            • froofrou says:

              Now see, you took that in a mean direction and that was unnecessary.

              • Scum says:

                I took it in a mean direction? I think not.
                -
                I think ’twas you who implied that only fools are voting for Barney Frank. As an ex-Massachusetts resident, I thought that was rather mean, uncalled for, and simply not demonstrable by fact.
                -
                Now, I took it with some degree of humor, which I assume
                was there, and I replied with a bit of humor.

                ;-)

                • rhorho says:

                  Don’t sweat it. She calls me mean all the time, and never
                  with any proof. Just be glad she didn’t hit you over the
                  head with her Ryrie Study Bible. She put weights in it.

                  • Scum says:

                    Hehe, nah, I’m not worried.

                    I just wanted to point out that even though I’m sure it wasn’t thought of at the time she wrote it, what I said was no more mean than what she said.

                    I really don’t take anything said or done up here personally. Y’all don’t know me from Steve

                    • rhorho says:

                      Steve? The drunk guy I just put into a cab bound for
                      Amarillo? Trust me, I can tell you two apart…
                      ;-)

                      • Scum says:

                        No, you know, Steve, of Adam and Steve.

                        But now I have to ask. Is that your normal operating procedure? Invite some guy over, get him drunk, do whatever it is you did to him, then ship him off to Amarillo?
                        -
                        Is this like a slave trade ring you’re involved in or something?

                      • Steve says:

                        I’m enjoying my time in Amarillo by the way, now that the hangover has subsided!
                        I found a fantastic BBQ joint…yummm!
                        *looks around*
                        Which way to…anywhere?
                        Rho…did you send me to the middle of nowhere!?!
                        -
                        Oh well, at least it’s above 0 here!
                        *dons flip-flops and buys a 6 pack of cold brews*
                        *strolls down the street looking for a hammock*

          • Michael says:

            You nailed that one…Well other brain would the following idea come from than that of a full time fool? “I know George Bush inherited the largest government surplus of any President ever, but the recession and the greatest deficit we have ever faced 8 years later is still Bill Clinton’s fault!”
            These last gaspers are clearly suffering from Brain damage!!

            • rhorho says:

              “Last gaspers” I like that, and good point. ;-)

            • JasonTD says:

              ““I know George Bush inherited the largest government surplus of any President ever. . .”

              Just so you know, those were projected surpluses, not money actually in the bank. They were based on assumptions of how the economy would perform in the future that turned out to be wrong when the bursting of the dot.com bubble started affecting the rest of the economy. And while I wouldn’t say that the recession was ‘Clinton’s fault’, there is some debate about whether it started during his last term of a couple of months into Bush’s first. So, it’s hardly ‘Bush’s fault’ either. Recessions are cyclical anyway, there isn’t much government can do to avoid them, but they can make them less or more painful depending on how they react to them.

              Oh, and for the record, I never voted for Bush. I voted for Nader twice. ;)

              • PortlandMark says:

                “Just so you know, those were projected surpluses, not money actually in the bank. They were based on assumptions of how the economy would perform in the future that turned out to be wrong when the bursting of the dot.com bubble started affecting the rest of the economy. ”

                The “wrongness” had a lot more to do with the Bush tax breaks for the wealthy, and increased spending. Because, you know, Republicans are all about fiscal responsibility.

              • TheOtherMike says:

                “Oh, and for the record, I never voted for Bush. I voted for Nader twice.”

                So in other words, you voted for Bush once, and wasted your vote the second time (assuming you live in Florida, anyway… if not, your vote was wasted both times).

          • Steve says:

            But you can’t fool all da people all da tiem!

            *starts quietly desk-jammin’*

  4. truthtold says:

    I think they are arresting him for his tie.

  5. sam says:

    Actually, this is Karl Rove, not Scooter Libby…

  6. FactChecker says:

    Lies, that’s Karl Rove!

    • Uncle Fester says:

      You Americans all look the same to me.

      • Scum says:

        That’s cool, and we Americans love our British friends. [link]

        • Uncle Fester says:

          Nice set… but it wasn’t Doctor Hibbert who had The British Book of Smiles, it was the Quack dentist whose name escapes me…

          It has one of my favourite Simpsons’ scenes ever

          Photographer: 2C’mon simle of the camera…”
          Lisa smiles

          Photographer: (recoiling in horror) “*Gasp* There is no God!!!”

          • Scum says:

            I know, but I couldn’t find the actual screen caps or find it up on youtube.
            I’m sure it used to be up there, but I think the studios are all cracking down on posting their materials.

  7. jeeprod says:

    funny that you’d choose a member of the Republican administration…regarding the ‘bailout’ and the need for it, etc.
    1. I’m a registered and voting Democrat.
    2. Even I recognize it was Obama’s (and yes, i PROUDLY voted for him) present economic advisors who ran Fannie, Freddie and AIG.
    3. It was THEIR criminal activity and malfeasance that started the ‘dominoes’ of the economic problem we’d had, NOT a single Republican.
    4. UNFORTUNATELY (egg on our Democrat faces)..the Federal Registry and Archive CLEARLY shows the Republicans (4 times), President Clinton (2 times) and the Bank Registrars (3 times), testified to the Democrat-controlled Banking and Finance Committee (Barney Frank) that there were ‘irregularities’ and “problems we can’t begin to imagine”….ever since 1998….
    So, when we see the former heads of Fannie, Freddie, AIG, Franks, Dodd, and Cobb arrested and dragged through the streets behind a stretch Hummer limo…..
    we’ll know someone sought and found justice.
    P.S. My diverse 401K lost over $230,000 US in the last 19 months, so I KNOW.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      First of all, your 401k… well, if you make that size bet with the world’s largest floating crap game, expect a loss… Only the house wins… that’s the nature of anarcho-capitalism.
      As to the rest, well, who, other than an idiot thought Nyarlathotep was going to be a ‘change’ of anything, other than face in the White House?

      • Danbala says:

        “As to the rest, well, who, other than an idiot thought Nyarlathotep was going to be a ‘change’ of anything, other than face in the White House?”
        You’re referring only to the economy and closely related topics, or?

      • ubr says:

        fester, your apparent jealousy at his retirement plan is noteworthy… and “expect a loss” further solidifies your lack of training or education in the financial sector… but keep festering… it works well for you…

        • Mike says:

          Stop, or he and his henchmen will accuse you of being AntiFester….

        • PortlandMark says:

          Historically, unregulated capitalist economies tend to have major meltdowns every twenty to thirty-five years. In the US, since the first Republican Great Depression of 1929, we managed to avoid a major collapse for decades by regulating commerce and industry pretty carefully. Along comes Reagan, who initiates the deregulation of business, and we get the Savings and Loan collapse almost immediately, followed by the second Republican Great Depression, (wow, almost thirty years exactly!)

          So, yeah, I’d agree with Fester: booms and busts are a sign of a poorly regulated capitalist system.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          I know he’s not AF, just a ‘Financial Advisor’ (pronounced ‘Con Man’)

      • Steve says:

        Fester – I’m pretty sure the word “diverse” means that it encompasses world funds, not only US funds. I’m curious as to how the Great and Wise Fester invests his money. Did you bury it in a mayonnaise jar in your garden? I suppose you wouldn’t expect losses that way, but gains are unlikely as well.

        I myself have only 50% of my pension in US investments, the rest are world funds, overseas commodities, etc. I ‘lost’ $25,000 myself this year. Everything suffered nearly the same 40% decline, not just the US portion of my investments.
        -
        Thankfully I haven’t actually lost anything, as I have no intention of retiring any time soon. The silver lining is that I can use this as an opportunity to buy more shares at these great sale prices!

        • Uncle Fester says:

          I think the phrase ‘None of your business’… but I can only assume you’re like ubr, just another croupier in the world’s biggest roulette game…

          Articles of faith and bones of saints… nothing like it for gulling the rubes. :twisted:

    • Uncle Fester says:

      The myth of infinite growth with finite resources.

  8. PortlandMark says:

    Today I hear some of the banks who were bailed out are using the money to lobby against the employee free choice act. Can we please have that money back now?

    • pcflamingo says:

      They are also using it to pay bonuses to the pin heads who helped drive the train off the tracks (AIG) and were trying to buy a $50 million jet (B of A?). They really have no shame. Or sense.

      • ubr says:

        $50M jet was CITI… but they are trying to sell their other two jets for $27M a piece…

      • Susan says:

        Actually, the jet was ordered a LONG time ago…it wasn’t ordered on the bailout money. That said, it was a stupid idea to order it when they were already in trouble.

        And what is funny about the photo anywa? Photo isn’t and neither is the caption or the proposed one.

        And again, nothing submitted that criticizes The One.

        • mothergoose says:

          Oh that’s right..they didn’t use bailout money…just the money we had ALREADY trusted them with…hmmm..I also don’t think they’dve had a problem using bailout money to fuel and maintain the damn thing….

          • I have a bit of a problem with the banks/financials in particular spending great wads of cash (for example, the AIG corporate spa retreat timed the week after the bailout) and innocently blinking and telling everyone “Oh, we already paid for that….that’s just business as usual.”

            Gee, dipsh!ts, you think that might be contributing to why you needed to be bailed out? Maybe?

            • froofrou says:

              They needed to be bailed out because of the massive number of unsecured loans, not necessarily from monies ill-used. Although, I guess that could all fall into the same category.

              • mothergoose says:

                If I secure a loan from a bank to buy a $50,000 Humvee, then can’t make the payments on it because I mismanaged my household funds, do you think the bank would offer you or me a bailout?!!

                • mothergoose says:

                  Froo, I hope that my post didn’t come off sounding like a personal attack…I re-read it and it may have sounded a bit “bitchy”…*hugs*

                  • froofrou says:

                    Oh, I didn’t take it as you being b*tchy! I took it more as frustration for the broken system, not as directed at me :-) *hugs*

                • froofrou says:

                  No, they wouldn’t. Nor should they. But that’s not exactly what happened. Barney Frank, in all his wisdom, used his influence (along with the influence of cronies) to push through legislation to either allow banks to relax their loan standards to loan money to those who would be unlikely to pay it back, or to force banks to made said loans.
                  -
                  Would yo give your jailbird cousin, who had been in and out of jail for theft, any money and expect him to pay it back, especially considering that he has no job? That’s an exaggeration of exactly what happened.

                  • mothergoose says:

                    Wow!! You must know my deadbeat cousin!!! I guess what I’m pointing at is the “double standsrd” that the banks are using…it was ok for them to loan out money to high-risks and then expect a bailout..(I understand about Barney and the legislation), but the poor schmo who couldn’t make his payments wound up foreclosed on…no “bailout” for him…

                    Ultimately, even though the legislation allowed the banks to make those loans…They really had the ability to NOT make those loans in the first place.

                    • ubr says:

                      in the industry it is known as responsible lending practices… it’s a relatively new term…

                    • froofrou says:

                      What if your mother was pressuring you into loaning your cousin money, because ‘he’s family’? Would you do it? :-)

                      • ubr says:

                        family and business should never exist in the same sentence…
                        unless you’re in the mob.

                        • rhorho says:

                          And that always goes so well…

                        • froofrou says:

                          The point I’m trying to illustrate is that the banks were a little like you having a deadbeat cousin (brother, uncle, dad, what have you) who needed money, and your mom is pressuring you to give him money. You have the choice not to, but you pay for it in other ways. The banks had the choice NOT to loan to iffy borrowers, but there was an understood pressure from ‘Mommy’ (i.e. Barney Frank and the like) that told them to loan to these people.
                          -
                          That’s a bit simplistic, but it illustrates the main point rather well, I think :-)

                  • PortlandMark says:

                    Froo, could you please provide a link that shows how one democratic congressman pushed through legislation against the combined weight of a Republican house, Republican senate, and Republican president? I believe I smell some cognitive dissonance.

                    • froofrou says:

                      I can’t do that, because it isn’t that simple. I’ve admitted that. I’m just trying to distill it down to something that’s a little easier to understand. I can (if you’ll give me a little bit) give you sources that Barney Frank fought against regulations for Fannie and Freddie.

              • Yeah, I mean ridiculous business practices in general. Which, making loans like a drunk guy handing out tips at a strip club is not the greatest business pracite either.

                • Steve says:

                  At lest you get an instant (if brief) return on that investment!

                  • Yes, the ephemeral pleasures of the rented flesh…although I have to admit I don’t entirely understand that, but I just view it as one of those charming differences between men and women.

                    • Steve says:

                      Women don’t understand strip clubs. Every guy that has ever been nice to you is just trying to get in your pants. I bet guys hit on you daily.
                      -
                      Men go to strip clubs because it’s the one place where gorgeous women will flock all around us competing for our attention(money). They come up to us, buck naked, and put a hand on our shoulder, or thigh, and whisper into our ear “Would you like a lap-dance darling?”
                      -
                      And for one brief moment we have the power, and can answer “Nope!, you’re not my type!” and then the next beautiful stripper is right there for us to reject! We then continue that process until we find the one girl in the club who is EXACTLY our type.
                      -
                      Strip club is an exact reversal of the traditional bar scene. Instead of men making advances on women, it’s opposite. The difference is simply less clothing, and the men are still the ones spending the money.

                      • You know, I don’t think I’ve ever heard it explained that simply and candidly. Thanks!
                        *feels one step closer to understanding the mystery that is the opposite sex*

                      • Tessie says:

                        “Men go to strip clubs because it’s the one place where gorgeous women will flock all around us competing for our attention”
                        `
                        And what do women get? Romance novels. Feh.

                      • Kuromisa says:

                        I believe I heard that on Comedy Central once.

                        • Steve says:

                          You probably have, but it seems fairly true, so I paraphrased and repeated it here.

                          I’ve only been to a strip club a couple times in my life, it’s fun once in a great while. I wouldn’t spend money there on a regular basis.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                I think the problem was less unsecured loans and more the
                financial institutions selling on higher risk debt as a AAA rated
                investment with tacit approval of pet ‘independent’
                “regulators”. Typical scheme was Institution A sells Institution B a AAA rated package of investments. Post sale the package was then loaded with things that should never have had a AAA rating, but, “temporarily”, did. Along came an audit and suddenly AAA rated investments are being dropped three to five points in hours, when, typically, a rating won’t vary by more than a point up or down in a 30-90 day period… some (most) don’t vary more than a point for their lifetime)
                It was the Casino stuffing the Casino that caused the ‘lack of confidence’ since no one knew where the crappy stuff was, and who would be holding the bomb when it stopped ticking.
                It’s interesting to see the number of Ponzi schemes that are now coming to light.

            • PortlandMark says:

              Then, when I come in with a paycheck drawn on their bank, they ask, “Do you have an account with us sir? No? Well that’ll be an additional charge”. Not to mention all the other ways they nickel and dime us.

    • froofrou says:

      That’s a falacy, from what I’ve heard. None of that money was from the bailout, it had been contracted out a while back. I’ll try to find a source from that to make sure, but that’s what I heard.

  9. Mike says:

    ” Child molester, also known as “Uncle Fester” was arrested today at his home…”

  10. TeeBee says:

    This is dumb.

    The people who created this mess are the predatory lenders and the idiots who thought that just because some prick at a bank said they could afford a $400,000 house on a $50,000/yr salary they should buy one, the banks and the supposed bipartisan “oversight” of which every politician got a little bonus.

    In a country that truly believes in capitalism and the free market, these aholes would have been out of business long before George Bush I got in to office…

    Carry on, soldiers of tomorrow! :p

    • ubr says:

      stated loan programs were the start of this whole mess… did you know that with a 680 FICO and 3 months of liquid reserves you could buy a house up to $650k with no mondy down and without anyone checking more than the fact that you had a job?

      • ubr says:

        mondy = money… stupid keyboard… i need some coffee…

        • rhorho says:

          I’ve noticed that my keypad gets smarter when I drink coffee, too…

          *hatches idea of conspiracy between Folgers and HP*

          Six years ago I bought a house, and was surprised to discover how much
          loan value for which I was “qualified.” Luckily, the amount was out of my
          comfort zone. Having said that, I can see how someone would trust the
          word of a broker over his/her own estimation, because of the feeling that
          the broker would naturally have expertise. Surely s/he would have no
          reason to lend an amount greater than the borrower, right?

          Remembering what *could* have happened to me makes it saddening to read/hear people blaming struggling homeowners for not having bought
          within their means.
          borrowing responsibly in the first place.

          • rhorho says:

            than the borrower *can afford

          • Scum says:

            Folgers? Really? People still drink that?

            I though Juan Valdez admitted years ago that it was really donkey droppings.

            [link] for a different take on coffee

          • ubr says:

            i actually work for one of these large mortgage companies on the secondary marketing side and i really don’t have much sympathy for most of the borrowers… i know how much i’m willing to devote to my living expenses and wouldn’t borrow any more than that payment…
            who i do feel sad for are the borrowers who go cheated into the so called ‘pay option arm programs’… it started with a 1% payment rate for the first three years, the problem was that the mortgage was still accruing interest at around 7% annually… and you couldn’t get out of the loan for 3yrs without paying a huge (2-4% of the loan amont) prepay penalty…
            so even though you’re making payments your mortgage balance increases monthly… and the brokers who sold them these loans usually made about 4% of the loan amount in fees… just ridiculous…

          • Steve says:

            I just purchased a home in July, and I too was “qualified” for a much larger loan than I could actually make the payments on. What confused me is that the same lending institution also carried my auto loan, and knew how much my weekly payroll deposits were. They had to have known that I couldn’t pay a mortgage that large, where did they expect me to get the money?
            -
            Fortunately I purchased something well within my means, but I understand how someone would take the word of a banker without taking the time to do the math. Some people are just bad at managing money, and don’t realize how much they spend each month.
            I don’t think it’s the borrowers fault. The bank should know better, after all they are bankers, they handle money for a living.

            • Uncle Fester says:

              The bank should know better, after all they are bankers, they handle money for a living.

              They mostly do… what that banker was doing was trying to take you up the arse, dry… which is what they do… they can’t help it…

          • TeeBee says:

            I just bought my first house in October and I was shocked to head how much my lender, a friend of my family for many years, told me I could “afford”. Then I added up my car payment, heat, electricty, cable, food, alcohol requirements, hand sanitizers, lubricants, etc and decided that my lender was full of tihs and told him what I wanted to spend. He kept telling me to go for more and check out these numbers! I bought my house for my price and I can still afford to drink…

            The way I see it, if you are about to spend anywhere from $100,000 to $500,000 on something, you better be able to balance your effing checkbook and you should have already figured out that loan officers are the car dealers of the housing industry and trust them only as far as you can punt them.

            rhorho, you and I thought about our situation before jumping in, which is simply common sense. Common sense is entirely uncommon and to the guy that bought three houses for $300k each, you are a douchebag, eff you painfully. :)

            • Tessie says:

              @Steve and TeeBee above:
              `
              Is there a formula or rule of thumb that expresses housing cost relative to income? There used to be an old rule that if you were a renter, your month’s rent should be equal to one week of your take-home pay. I know, good luck doing that now, but still… Is there a rule that anyone knows of to the effect of your house [insert ratio here] your annual salary, or your monthly house payment [insert ratio here] your take-home? Cause if there is, I’ve never heard it.

              • rhorho says:

                I was told I could afford a loan that was 8 x my annual gross
                income, but the industry standard is anywhere from 2-6 x
                annual gross income.

                If I understand correctly, according to the old-school 28/36
                ratio, your house payment should be 28% or less of your
                monthly gross income, and your overall minimum payments
                + house payment should be no more than 36% of your
                monthly gross income.

  11. dr42ix says:

    FAIL. scooter libby is totally cuter.

  12. Martha says:

    OK, how naive am I!

    I thought it was Karl Rove; had to Google-images Scooter Libby to confirm my original thought: the face is Rove’s.

    BUT: http://www.politicalhumor.about.com indicates this is a doctored photo (“Karl Rove Arrest Picture – Doctored Photo of Karl Rove Perp Walk”). Dammit — I have SO wanted to see arrests of Rove, Cheney, & a few others of their coterie.

    BUT unfortunately, I don’t think Rove’s ever been arrested. At least not in the last 8 years in WDC.

    So what do y’all think the photo is? Libby’s body, Rove’s face?

  13. Tessie says:

    As much as I’d like to see Rove doing the perp walk (especially now that he’s basically flipped the bird to TWO subpoenas), I don’t get the connection between that and the bailout.
    Am I missing something?

    • ubr says:

      nope… just people trying to play connect the dot with lols…

    • jerseygirl in GA says:

      I agree… I thought this was a reference to the spy revelation scandal. On that case he should be arrested and tried!!! I feel he was involved and did compromise national security. But instead, he is a commentator on Fox (fair and balanced my ass) and wrote an editorial about Bush in the Wall Street Journal a few weeks ago. BLAH!

  14. penguin_man says:

    If they send him to jail, won’t we be paying for him to be in jail.

  15. IPG says:

    What has happened with PK? All of a sudden all lols with a hint of criticism towards conservatives get voted down, receiving significantly higher numbers of votes than other lols. Yet voting numbers on individual voted-down lols vary a lot as if to ensure that lols get about 2 Abes. Still 90% of the comments are by the same 5 or 6 people.

    Not that some of the lols necessarily deserve more than 2 Abes, but voting behavior has become pretty odd. Seems as if somebody is gaming the system.

  16. Matt says:

    FYI thats Karl Rove… not Scooter Libby. Besides, this is probably a photoshopped picture.

  17. hotsauce says:

    Also what the inauguration should have looked like, rather than a helicopter ride.

      • Scum says:

        Treason would be a good place to start.

          • Scum says:

            Who flew away in a helicopter on inauguration day?

            • Uncle Fester says:

              Oh, right… sorry… I avoided it like the plague… but I can guess who.

              • Scum says:

                Even if you did avoid it, I’m sure you’ve seen some of the pics up here of him boarding the ‘copter or of new administration waving ‘bye’ as it took off. Possibly you’ve also seen video clips of the crowd singing/chanting:
                “na na na na, na na na na. Hey hey, good bye” as it flew overhead.
                -
                Petty and childish, yes, but still funny as hell and so appropriate. Sometimes you just have to let out that inner child-ishness.
                -
                Anyway, that’s how I interpreted hotsauces comment.

                • rhorho says:

                  Childishness is a useful outlet for expression of impolite
                  emotion. I giggled waaay too much at a caption recently.
                  The photo showed Cheney in a wheelchair, being pushed
                  by a woman with a sarcastic expression on her face. Her
                  thought bubble read, “Where’s a cliff when you need one?”

  18. funk says:

    this would be funny if it was labeled correctly.

  19. B. says:

    OMFG. ROFLMFAO. NAACP.

    How many people think this is funny without realizing the picture is of Karl Rove= amusing fail.

    How many people think this is funny because they think it’s L. Scooter Libby= depressing fail.

    Liberals: even in victory, they’re still ignorant frakking morons.

  20. Anniee451 says:

    Awww. Isn’t that CUTE?

    Condi Rice had the morons at The View spellbound today – poor Joy Behar looked like a deer in the headlights faced with actual intelligence in her presence; couldn’t think of a single stupid wisecrack. For once the collective IQ on the stage soared into the triple digits :D

  21. V. Henry says:

    I don’t care if it was photo shopped, it was still hilarious!

  22. Casez says:

    He seriously looks like my physics teacher……….
    weird……


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    Rando at #13 on GOD HATES FAGS
    Cynical-Vegemite on GOD HATES FAGS
    Cynical-Vegemite on GOD HATES FAGS
    Schwinehund on Fear leads to anger.
    Justin on GOD HATES FAGS
    Hakencat on PULL!
    Cynical-Vegemite on Ask Mitt Anything
    Hakencat on Rule 34
    Hakencat on I see it!
    Default User on Ask Mitt Anything
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz