Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

lol! ozone layer!



obama pictures and mccain pictures

lol! ozone layer!

(Sarah Palin)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: matty

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 252 Comments

  1. Kel says:

    LOL indeed.

  2. Hardcore Bob says:

    Brilliant, win

    First? >.<

  3. Hardcore Bob says:

    Seems not

  4. Uncle Fester says:

    Do her sect believe in the Ozone layer?

  5. Azrael says:

    Ozone in the 90’s

  6. D'oh says:

    I don’t get it, is this supposed to be another “lulz palin is liek teh stoopid!11!” caption? If so, it’s REALLY late. Or did Palin come in the news again with something regarding the ozon layer?
    Must say that the presidential race wore me out a bit, so I’m leaving international politics to rest for a while ;) Gotta preserve that energy for the Obama ‘era’.

    • AC says:

      Yeah, I find myself rather unimpressed…….

    • Uncle Fester says:

      She’s not been out of the news, what with Bristol whelping, then the paternal grandmother being in court for possession of a class-a drug with intent to supply, then naming the whelp Tripp, in honour of Grandma Johnston’s profession of supplying hillbilly heroin to the Alaskan gentry…

      • Seth says:

        What is it with right wingers and OxyContin? Does the Republican party hand out free samples to new members or something?

      • Paul says:

        You forgot “and whining yet again about the media when some two-bit make-believe documentary-maker showed up at her doorstep”.

        She’s as whiny as Bill O’Reilly, which is quite an accomplishment.
        The next level is “As bat-shit crazy as Ann Coulter”. I don’t think she’ll achieve that, but it’s definitely in her sights.

      • Tessie says:

        “what with Bristol whelping, … then naming the whelp Tripp”
        `
        Thank goodness there are no Jews in Alaska, because if one of the chosen people fathered her next spawn, she’d name if Trayf.

      • Tessie says:

        “She’s not been out of the news,”
        `
        Didn’t she just try to scrounge a 16th minute of fame by giving an interview where she whined that Tina Fey and Katie Couric were, I don’t know, picking on her or something?

        • srab says:

          yes, i saw that one (my name is a link to the interview on youtube). she basically just whined for about eight minutes about how the media respected barack’s boundaries with his family and not hers and how tina fey and katie couric made her look stupid. it reminded me of a middle school girl complaining about not making the cheer squad.

          • mothergoose says:

            Except that she keeps bringing her family up in the media…and the whole “family values”-thing….and the whole “I have a special-needs child”-thing….so, in essence, ya’ gets whatcha paid for….

            • froofrou says:

              Well, the Obama kids get trotted out almost as frequently. Going to school, getting the puppy, and the like.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Asa photo op, not a talking point… and lets not forget the junky, vadalising son in Iraq, shall we? Family values fail…

                • slan agat says:

                  And the abstinence-only education platform. How’s that working out for you, Bristol?

                  • froofrou says:

                    That’s been debunked as an urban legend. Or a left wing talking point.

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      Actually less ‘debunked’ and more ‘not proven’… no one actually knows… she could have been fitting condoms on bananas since she was six, or maybe she still thinks that ‘IUD’ is something that Islamic terrorists leave by the side of roads to kill ‘our boys’…

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        the Conservative Right Party line is ‘abstinence only’, as is the guidelines from most of the Baptist sects and the Roman Catholic Communion in which MAdame Palin was raised… so we have a three for three in likelihood of what Bristol was taught at home (along with bad science)

      • PortlandMark says:

        And the “The media are unfair to me!” interviews she keeps having with various members of the media.

  7. Steve says:

    “Honey, I have an idea! Oooops…there it goes!”
    “I saw it Sarah, that was almost a complete thought!”

  8. Czernobog says:

    It is like a finger pointing up at the moon. Don’t focus on the finger, or you will miss all that heavenly glory.

    • Seth says:

      The moon is cold, hard, and lifeless. It only looks bright in comparison to all the dim around it. It has the IQ of, well, a rock. I would never have sex with the moon, no matter how cute it is. So, yeah. Apt comparison.

      • mothergoose says:

        The moon is cold, hard, and lifeless just like Sarah Palin’s chances of becoming President in ‘12…

        • PortlandMark says:

          Maybe her chances for the presidency are small, but I think her chance for the nomination are pretty good, ekshually!

          • Uncle Fester says:

            Republicans like their leaders to be dead behind the eyes…

          • Kuromisa says:

            I kind of hope she does get nominated, since there’s no way she’ll actually get elected.

            • mothergoose says:

              It’ll at least keep Tina Fey employed!!

            • slan agat says:

              Last poll I saw, 63% of Republicans want Palin to run in oh-12.

              So do 99% of Democrats.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Ba-dum SPASH!

              • Paul says:

                You’ve got to love a Republican candidate whose campaign strategy is “I’m only going to go after the votes of people who live in really small towns, and actively reject the voters in big cities”.

                Yeah, um, that’s going to work. Right. Good luck, hon.

                Do you think she knows that the point of campaigning is to get a lot of votes? She didn’t seem to know that this time around.
                =================
                On top of that, she apparently now thinks that if Caroline Kennedy isn’t crucified in the media, it’s because of liberal media bias. Now I don’t remember Caroline running around the country telling people that they’re not real Americans, and I don’t remember her going in front of angry mobs and inciting them to shout violent threats against Americans.

                Part of me suspects that if Sarah Palin got treated badly by the media, it might have something to do with her consistently anti-American and totally irresponsible behavior. She in fact didn’t get what she deserved: the media treated her FAR better than she deserved. No-one would have put up with a Democrat acting like a terrorist-inciting Imam, but Sarah Palin managed to become the darling of the extreme right with that behavior. I find that very revealing.

                • froofrou says:

                  “Terrorist inciting Imam?” Yes, the left is so very very tolerant and open-minded, they don’t throw around silly names at ALL.
                  -
                  She’s controversial. She’s not a terrorist any more than Obama is a Muslim.

                  • slan agat says:

                    False moral equivalency fail.

                    Calling someone out in harsh terms for inciting hatred

                    DOES NOT EQUAL

                    Inciting hatred.

                    .

                    That said, you’re right, she’s not a terrorist any more than Obama is a Muslim. So why in hell does she get a pass for insinuating that Obama is a Muslim terrorist? Answer: She doesn’t.

                    .

                    Radical cleric inciting violent hatred

                    is a lot closer to equal to

                    Radical politician inciting violent hatred.

                    • PortlandMark says:

                      Win!

                    • froofrou says:

                      Radical cleric inciting violent hatred……..Jeremiah Wright?

                      • Scum says:

                        Oh please, most of the christian pastors/ministers who are in the public eye have said far worse things in public, to the media, on their tv shows, on their radio shows, than this guy ever said, to his congregation.

                        Face it, the face of christianity today is hate, dissension, divide and conquer, power, money and control. I know you don’t want to hear that, but it’s true, and if you’re honest with yourself, you’ll admit it, at least to yourself.

                        I am not only atheist, I am one of those anti-theists. I find the whole notion that people in this day and age still believe in the old ghost stories told by cavemen, revolting, and yet, I was pissed off that Obama separated himself from Jeremiah Wright.

                        • rhorho says:

                          As Uncle Fester puts it (paraphrasing), how
                          much do you want to trust a man with an
                          imaginary friend named Dave?

                        • froofrou says:

                          You’re taking it a step too far. You’ve described the face of RELIGION today, not Christianity. The two are not interchangeable. Nor should they be. I don’t know what churches you’ve been to that have spewed more hate-filled crap from the pulpit than Jeremiah Wright did (“God DAMN America! God F*CK America!”), but I feel sorry for you that you’ve had to hear that. It’s not mainstream, it’s not right, and it’s not Christianity as a whole. Not even close. You may be referring to teh more insidious factions on the radio, in the media, and the like when you’re talking about ’said far worse things in public’, but people like Jerry Falwell are hardly embraced by the religious right as their beacons of light. I’m sorry you’ve had such a rough time with religion. You’ve gotten the dregs, as I have of the Left. It makes me suspicious and skeptical about everything they say, which is where you seem to be about religion.
                          -
                          Also, Jeremiah Wright was spewing this sh!t from the pulpit for 20 years, and for no one to have noticed either means they are the worst church-goers ever (meaning they never went), they slept through the services, or they agreed.

                        • PortlandMark says:

                          “Also, Jeremiah Wright was spewing this sh!t from the pulpit for 20 years, and for no one to have noticed either means they are the worst church-goers ever (meaning they never went), they slept through the services, or they agreed.”

                          I haven’t seen more than the fifteen minute portion of the sermon that Fox News kept playing fifteen seconds of, but speaking as a white guy, I found his sermon to be not at all hate filled. It was a thoughtful and incisive commentary on the abuse blacks have suffered in our country, and a deflation of the idea so many Americans have that we are somehow better than the rest of the world. You know, the kind of hubris that says a bomb which kills a family is heroic if fired from an airplane circling miles away, but is evil if it’s driven to a location and detonated.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          I’ve seen the whole thing… and as much as I don’t respect a man with an imaginary friend, the collective guilt thing wasn’t that far off the mark.
                          Knowing a lot of the hisroty of slavery, ‘God Damn America’ was pretty tame…
                          I wonder if he’d been a Native American, as opposed to a Black American he’d be accused of bile by whitey?

                      • rhorho says:

                        You mean the man whom Obama renounced
                        and rejected 10 months ago?

                        • dissimilitude says:

                          …when it became politically expedient to do so?
                          Nothing against Obama; I think a lot of people don’t pay that much attention in church…but I’m fairly cynical and I’ve always thought he joined the church to add to his credibility as a black politician, and then left when it was hurting more than it helped.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Well, since America is vying to become a third wolrd hell, I think it’s great that a place that prides itself on the seperation of church and state won’t countenance an atheist standing for election is a great start.

                          Over here, where we have a state religion (the Anglican communion) if a politician started invoking God in his speeches or in his electoral cant, he’d be dismissed as the sort of loon we don’t want in power. There are a goodly number of atheists in Parliament, and they do a fine job…

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    Yes, the left is so very very tolerant and open-minded, they don’t throw around silly names at ALL.

                    compared to the steady, George A Romero stylee- Zombie litany of ‘OBamessiah’ and ‘The Chosen One’ and ‘Obama-bot’ I think you’ll find that it’s
                    pretty rare on the left, so as to be negligible…

                    Seems the Right want to throw the names round with gay abandon, yet have an aneurysm if some one dare to do it back

                    Frou, pull on the big girl panties and stop being a bloody hypocrite. You’re better than that…

                    • Fester, I seem to recall hearing a lot of “McSame” and “Caribou Barbie” comments pre-election as well; while I think it’s juvenile either way I think it’s facile to argue that it’s entirely (or even mostly) right-wing
                      name-calling. For what it’s worth, I don’t give Palin a pass for the ugly crowds, either.

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        The right wing certainly have more Obama synonyms than McCain’s one (which was widely used by people who didn’t like McCain in the Rep camp and by Libertarians) and ‘Caribou Barbie’ which I think originated
                        with Fox to emphasise her all American Frontier spirit, and her allegedge good looks… also, certainly here, the use of those names has largely gone by the bye, it’s only the right wingers who cling to the rhetoric of the usual na

      • AC says:

        It’s really the sun that has all the glory since the moon is just a giant mirror…

        • n8 says:

          Since the moon has no light of its own, and merely reflects sunlight, why then do vampires not die in the moonlight?

          • Kuromisa says:

            *opens mouth to make a crack about sparkly vampires, then closes it* No, I think I’ve killed enough of my soul today. *sigh*

          • Uncle Fester says:

            It’s polarised light… so it’s obvious…

            • Scum says:

              I think you meant that the moons light is diffused not polarized. This is the same reason the light from the planets doesn’t ‘twinkle’ the way a stars light does when it passes through our turbulent atmosphere.

              As to vampires, I’ll leave that to you all.

          • AC says:

            hmmmmm……

          • Recycled sunlight provides no real warmth at night from how cold I have seen nights get with the full moon out. No UV radiation either since nobody tans at night.

            The lack of UV is what I am going with.

            • froofrou says:

              Well, if you watch Angel, he can be out in the daylight, as long as it’s diffuse light. Also, Dracula could go out in daylight. I’m not sure when the ‘vampires die in the sunlight’ came from. Maybe Ann Rice?

              • Dracula could go out because he was Dracula. Anne Rice got it from somewhere but I can’t think of the original and exact mythos that crispy sunfriend vampire idea came from.

                • OhMyGoodness says:

                  Stoker certainly used the device, but for the life of me I can’t recall if he explained the why.

                  • froofrou says:

                    I don’t think he did. I just remember that Dracula was seen in broad daylight more than once with no ill effects. In the Anne Rice stuff, even diffuse light would hurt, direct light would kill. As you get into more mainstream vampires (aAngel, Spike, and others (Twilight), the rules change. Angel and Spike could go out in sunlight as long as it didn’t directly hit them. Edward Cullen could go out in sunlight just fine, but didn’t because he was sparkly (ick). And there are other permutations of the legend that get too squinky to try to parse here.

                • slan agat says:

                  Vlad could be out and about in sunlight, but IIRC he was powerless.

  9. rock says:

    and, it’s STILL there! I guess us evil humans aren’t as powerful as we think we are…

    • Kuromisa says:

      Not that the human race isn’t doing its best to screw the planet over, so just wait a couple decades.

    • pdq says:

      That’s RIGHT!! Despite all we’ve done to feck it all over, the planet is STILL THERE!! All those jackasses who cry ‘planet in danger’ are SO overstating the fact – after all, it’s OUR asses in the fire, n’est c’est pas mon ami? We’ve only killed off… how many species? And ours is… how far down the list?

    • mothergoose says:

      And if we keep going at the present rate, this planet will be nothing more than your screen name…

      • me says:

        i believe you overestimate mankind (or underestimate the sturdiness (sic?) of nature). life on this piece of rock has survived through more than us feeble humans. there have been five major extinctions (ordovician (50%), devonian (50%), permian–triassic (90% sea, 66% land), triassic–jurassic (50%-80%) and cretaceous–tertiary (50%)) the last one was that pile o’ rock that hit the planet, while the big ones are believed to be connected to an incredible amount of volcanic activity. so trust me on this: whatever we do and no matter how bad we fuck up, give life a couple of millenia and it’s back for more…

      • slan agat says:

        George Carlin put it succinctly: “The earth will be just fine! Humans? Are fncked!”

    • Uncle Fester says:

      It’s still there in patches, you moron…

      • rock says:

        It’s closing up now. I guess that’s because we have all been such good humans
        lately.

        • AC says:

          Well, banning CFCs was a good move…

        • PortlandMark says:

          I believe you are mistaken. This from Wikipedia. Link in my name:

          Since the adoption and strengthening of the Montreal Protocol has led to reductions in the emissions of CFCs, atmospheric concentrations of the most significant compounds have been declining. These substances are being gradually removed from the atmosphere. By 2015, the Antarctic ozone hole would have reduced by only 1 million km² out of 25 (Newman et al., 2004); complete recovery of the Antarctic ozone layer will not occur until the year 2050 or later. Work has suggested that a detectable (and statistically significant) recovery will not occur until around 2024, with ozone levels recovering to 1980 levels by around 2068.[30]

  10. ubr says:

    yet again…
    .
    ***boring***

    • Uncle Fester says:

      I’m not sure satire has to be amusing…

      • Scum says:

        True UF, but there should be some wit or some semblance of irony.
        Unless it’s gone completely over my head, this has neither.

        The previous post, ‘Thoughts’ had something to which people could relate, so it’s meaning was understood, but it wasn’t witty, so at least some of us thought it was boring.

        This one, well, I can’t say I understand what the poster was even trying to convey. There are several possibilities, none of which I find witty, but that could just be my issue.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          I think the general belief by both Crazy yonug earthers (like her) and Crazy right wingers (like her) that the ecological problems that the earth currently faces are not down to humanity. This is for two reasons

          1) It makes us a bit too god like (although, if one takes the Eden myth literally, the fear of humans becoming as gods was the thing that got us kicked out)

          2) It screws up her deep pocketed corporate friends (although they’re now realisng they can make money out of the whole ‘Chicken little’ smorgesbord of indifferent to bad science and lazy media who just peddle hysteria)

          • Uncle Fester says:

            Jesus, Mary and Joseph… I should wear my glasses when I type more…

          • Scum says:

            You’re reading an awful lot of ’smart’ into that caption that I’m just not sure was there. I could be wrong.

            You are demonstrating why art is subjective. What do you, the viewer get out of it, which usually says more about the viewer than the art.

            From the TV show Taxi: they were standing around discussing a piece of art, and what it meant. The painting was a red circle in the middle of a rectangular white canvas. They were debating whether it meant loneliness, despair, maybe strength. Alex Rieger says “It’s the flag of Japan!!!”.

            I think this caption was the flag of Japan, but you saw more so kudos to you.

            • Uncle Fester says:

              I think you don’t get context…

              • Scum says:

                No, I’m just too literal for my own good. Most of the captions up here have little or nothing to do with what’s in the actual picture, so they fail immediately. Of course most of those don’t make the home page.

                In this picture, she is clearly pointing at something visible because they are both looking and smiling/laughing at it/them whatever it/them might be.

                Since she wouldn’t be able to see the ozone layer, I discount that as a possibility. Stretching it to indicate their beliefs/policies on global warming is, well, a stretch.

                In the post above I did say: “This one, well, I can’t say I understand what the poster was even trying to convey. There are several possibilities, none of which I find witty, but that could just be my issue.”

                What you laid out was one of the possibilities, and I still don’t find it witty.

                That’s ok, if we all had the same sense of humor, irony, or flavor of chewy center, it would be a boring world.

      • Scum says:

        Ok, I just created a very simple one from this same pic that I think works better than any of the other ones I see in the list. It’s not ‘funny’, but I think it works on two levels.

  11. MLD says:

    I can oddly hear her saying this… Complete with “Lawl”

  12. NinjaPacman says:

    You know you’re in a bad place when the COMMENTS are more amusing than the pic.

    …Actually, I take that back. That’s PK in general.

  13. Lauren says:

    Haha, look at there faces- Priceless.

  14. tyroan says:

    People, people, people…

    She is obviously saying, “Russia!”


Your Comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    dissimilitude on SCIENCE
    dissimilitude on Gay or straight…
    dissimilitude on Gay or straight…
    dissimilitude on Gay or straight…
    Catholic and proud o… on Invisible 10 year old boy
    Catholic and proud o… on Invisible 10 year old boy
    Catholic and proud o… on Invisible 10 year old boy
    meglet on CURIOUS GEORGE
    Catholic and proud o… on Invisible 10 year old boy
    Default User on Gay or straight…
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz