Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

THOUGHTS



Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

THOUGHTS: Our President now has them.

(Barack Obama)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: woodgod23

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 844 comments

  1. bobblehead says:

    First!

  2. Seth says:

    Now this is just unfair. Bush’s thinkerator was just full of cool thoughtchamajiggies.

  3. Jack Squat says:

    Technically not our president until Tuesday.

    Also it more looks like he’s thinking of where the penny the Secret Service hid is more than coming up with something to rule the nation. Not making a comment on his abilities, just on the image.

  4. Mike says:

    ” Where now should I build the first “Re-Education camps” for the masses?”

  5. faetal says:

    The look on his face is more along the lines of “I’m thinking cream upholstery with tangerine accent pillows” Pensive yes, not overtly deep however… not enough scowl for a deep thought.

  6. ubr says:

    ***boring***
    .
    can we have some more interesting LOLs?

  7. Mac Tips says:

    Best picture let. I laughed so hard.

  8. First says:

    boring…
    How did this make the home page? I’m not saying it’s not true, but there are some really creative captions waiting in the wings. How do some of these really boring ones make it so quickly?

  9. Beth says:

    Looks more like he’s thinking ” Can’t I find ANYONE in the Democrat party to nominate for a position who won’t cause a scandal over unpaid taxes, illegal nannies or outright criminal activities?”

    • Scum says:

      Could be, you never know.

      On the other hand, it looks like the Republicans always look for those with the most extensive criminal experience in order to give them the most influential positions.

      Which behavior would you rather see in the POTUS?

      • Beth says:

        Haven’t listened to the news today, have you?

        • Scum says:

          My point was that at least Obama is attempting to find people above reproach, where the Republican party seems to reward illicit behavior, as long as they’re not caught. As soon as they’re caught, they’re thrown under the bus, but that’s right-wing politics for you.

          So again, which would you rather have in office, someone who actively tries to find the best, and most honest people for a position, or someone who rewards and enables corruption?

          Personally, I don’t think there is any such thing as an honest politician who has been in office more than one year, but at least Obama is trying.

          • Tessie says:

            “As soon as they’re caught, they’re thrown under the bus,”
            `
            Or whine about how they’re “victims”.

            • Scum says:

              Very true. I am so sick and tired of the right-wing, political and religious, playing the part of ‘victim’.

              I am equally sick and tired of the left-wing falling for it every frickin’ time!.
              ‘Oh my god, you’re a victim? How can we slit our own wrists in order to help you feel less like a victim?’

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Like Bill O’Reilly and the few thousand oxycotin tabs and the collection of forged prescriptions…

                • slan agat says:

                  And let’s not forget stand-up comedian Rush Limbaugh.

                  Wait, wasn’t he the oxy and BillO the Clown something else? I can’t keep track anymore.

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    Bill was Oxy AND he had Viagra in someone else’s name… which was in violation of his probation, and should have had his ass thrown in jail, but for some reason didn’t…

                    • pdq says:

                      And it was all the fault of that liberal atmosphere he had to breathe during the Clinton era. And to add insult to injury, he had to endure the liberal rehab. Poor, poor baby.

                      • pdq says:

                        Finally! The intertoobz has been nomming my comments this morning. I been sittin’ here talkin’ to meself. If folks find numerous doubles, it’s all becuse the interwebs like me not :(

        • Scum says:

          Oh and no, I haven’t seen the news yet today, but have you been watching the news for the last 6 years? Please, Republican, Corruption is thy middle-name.

          • Beth says:

            Use your real name Seth.

            • Scum says:

              Sorry, I don’t know Seth, but if you think I’m him, I’m sure he and I would get along well.

              Seriously, if he has a pictures page here, would you please point me to it? I’d love to see who your mistaking me for.

              • rhorho says:

                It’s a huge compliment. If Seth has a page, I’m not aware of
                it. Maybe someone else will know.

                • Scum says:

                  After reading some of Seth’s posts, I thought so too. Then I considered the source and realized that this Beth person hasn’t had an original idea
                  since, well, since her pastor shoved them into her head.

                  She seems to simply spew forth that which she thinks will insult the other person.

                  All well and good since I’m not trying to emulate anyone up here anyway.

              • Scum says:

                Damn Damn Damn! I can’t believe I posted “your” instead of “you’re”!

                I hate when people do that. Now I’m going to have to be punished.

                • viking gal says:

                  Preferred method?!

                • Paul says:

                  Here’s your reward: I made a similar mistake yesterday (left “-ed” off the end of a verb that I meant to be in the past tense). Seeing your mistake is comforting to me.

                  • Scum says:

                    Thanks Paul.

                    Simple mistakes don’t bother me too much.

                    What bothers me, is either that education in the US has taken a dramatic turn for the dismal in the last two generations, or, the advent of the internet has simply given us all a better glimpse into the minds and hearts of the truly stupid and/or ignorant. I suspect it’s a bit of both. What bothered me about my post is that I made one of the most common mistakes made by the stupid and/or ignorant, and that takes away my right of righteous-indignation toward these people, unless they are consistent repeat offenders. I like being righteously indignant! (occasionally) ;-)

        • Paul says:

          Haven’t listened to the news the last twenty-nine years, have you?

      • ubr says:

        huh? i don’t understand the point you’re trying to make… republicans did what?
        .
        and btw, do you really want the sec tres to not be able to fill out his taxes properly?

        • Mike says:

          That would be helpful to the Democrats though….

          • slaggingham says:

            If they were any good at math, they wouldn’t be Democrats.

            • chickiepickle says:

              HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. yes. i like. maths. *sigh*

            • Uncle Fester says:

              Republican Math – Banks, screwing each other over, driving the world economy into the ground at speed. So, we pay them for the excellent job…

              Yes, that balances…

              Retardedness, you has it…

              • Literal says:

                Wait, UF, I thought you were unaffiliated.
                How about a little balance to that thought? I’m intrigued regarding your perception of of Democrat Math.
                Care to elucidate?

                • rhorho says:

                  Unc is an equal opportunity castigator, indeed.

                  • Mike says:

                    Like H*ll he is- he’s a Liberal sock puppet all the way! Why are you Libs so afraid to admit what you are ?

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      No you reatrd, I’m not a liberal… But, just sine you have the attention span of a gnat, accompained by a taste for mind altering drugs and opioid painkillers…

                      I realy don’t care what filthy, corrupt, foetid pile of pigs entrails you elect, be it from Ru-Paul to Denny the Hose Kuch (although I can more happly look at Denny’s wife than I can the other first ladies prospective)My interest is trying to keep the worst zombies real… people like you… who really can only spout their party election rhetoric like it meant something (hint: didn’t then, don’t now, you lost. Suck it up and quit whining like a little kid)
                      Same as I regard people,and there are some, who think that the sun shines out of the arse of lanky black guy with big ears (and I don’t mean Will Smith, y’all) as too dangerous to be allowed to have sharps or live unattended.

                      Now, maybe Obama IS the greatest thing since the invention of the cordless power drill. He’s probably not… not more than the bald cripple and the wilderness retard were going to change the world for the better (like getting American troops out fo most ofd it and curtailing the practice of US business being warfare carried forward by other means)

                      So, you stupid, stinking, idle, neo-facist bag of pus and bile… stick that up are arse when next you’re abusing oxycontin…

                      Oh, and I’d refrain from tellg you better their politics… it just annoys them, troll boy

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  Democrat Maths – Equally corrupt and equally stupid. However, to claim high ground on the ‘mathematics’ of the Republicans is simply loud, stupid and hypocritical, especially in view odf the Emperor’s new outfit of ‘banking bail out’… i

                  So, Literal, up your sorry arse with that one…

            • bluejade says:

              I am NOT a dem, but I fail to see the relevance of that statement.
              Republicans make lots of noise about how cautious they are with other peoples’ money, but every Republican regime since Reagan has reamed the budget.
              I now believe that is their intent; that the surest way to “fight big government” is to bankrupt the nation, preferably with war so that it can be cloaked in patriotism.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                TBH, Govt expands too… the Republicans don’t and never have ‘fought big govt’

                Rule of thumb – no government is going to approve it’s own reduction of spread and power.

                • slan agat says:

                  Yes, but the purposes are different.

                  Democrats generally believe they can accomplish some social good by using government as a tool (often a very large hammer). You can debate all you like about methods and about whether the goals they pursue are more appropriately pursued individually or collectively, but broadly speaking the intent is to use government to improve people’s lives.

                  Republicans’ mistrust of government, OTOH, is so all-encompassing that they go out of their way to undermine even what are generally considered legitimate government pursuits. Simultaneously dismantling regulation and stunting competition for instance, choking off funding for essential services, and placing incompetent people in key positions erode the functionality of government, which then allows them to point and tell us how horrible a job the government does at everything it tries, so of course we shouldn’t trust it. Never mind that they never wanted the government to succeed in the first place and set it up to fail, the failure is proof that we cannot hope for it to succeed.

                  • chickiepickle says:

                    on the other hand, the government was set up to limit it’s own federal power – hence the 10th amendment. The states/colonies were given power to govern themselves as they see fit and thereby the federal government should only be there to keep the general peace.

                    Democrats feel as though the federal government should control our individual lives, hence Obama’s promise to ‘think daily of those lower middle class Americans’ for whom he promises to pass legislation. They tend to forget that the best way to govern is to keep at a distance and correct when necessary – not make everyone into drones to stay in line (oh sorry – you said “social good” as if everyone thinks the same things are important).

                    Repubs think the only way to keep us from having an all-encompasing federal government is to make sure the federal government fails to hold water. That way, it can remain a constant across the nation without affecting the rights and privileges of state governments. Since when do the laws is Maine affect people the same way in Michigan?

                    Essential services, as you put it, vary from state to state, thereby making the federal government impotent in the matter unless the feds take over individual needs of state. In that case, why would we need state government?

                    Legitimate government pursuits as you say generally have many ways to look at them, and because something may seem legit for one person, it may be extraneous/unnecessary for another. Definition and interpretation is in the eye of the observer, and although you may think that gay marriage is in dire need of legislation, I may think it is superfluous and petty and should not bog down the government.

                    Dems do not want government to improve lives – since each life is different, the more laws you pass to ‘improve lives’ will very well hinder others, in which case the legislation is a failure. But Dems want that ‘big hammer’ to smash every square peg into the round hole…not feasible. And though they may think they have the best intentions…well we all know about the Road to Hell…

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      Actually, the Reps wrapping themselves in ‘Pro-Life’, Hard ball Law enforcement etc, are more socially interventionist against the individual than the Democrats

                      • chickiepickle says:

                        First of all, who started it? Roe-v-Wade is the public explosion of ‘keep your laws off my body.’ The deal Repubs have (well, more like conservatives since not all repubs are pro-life) is in the original constitution whereas every human is giving the rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness. So because each side is using the argument “when does life begin?”…who exactly is the unsinful ones who threw the first stone? who cares? But unfortunately each side will not back down until something happens. Sad reality of stubborn human nature, but still.

                        The fact is, one side is lobbying for the big human, the other is lobbying for the little one on its behalf. They are both human, but one side is more selfish than the other. You know, since the small one is relatively easily ignored. Until it is gone…but then it is too late. I don’t want to get into that discussion since there is one going on already farther down. And it might hurt people to read.

                        • PortlandMark says:

                          “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness” are from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution. It’s a fine document, very moving, but it has no legal standing.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Constitutional knowledge win…

                        • charro says:

                          THAT deserves at least a whole internet.

                        • rhorho says:

                          I was thinking 2 internets, but we can haggle.

                          I love the notion that Chickie argues states’
                          rights to govern and people’s rights to liberty,
                          then puts down California’s Prop 8, which
                          contained both of her jealously guarded
                          elements…Weird, if not altogether wacky.

                  • Tessie says:

                    “Republicans’ mistrust of government, OTOH, is so all-encompassing that they go out of their way to undermine even what are generally considered legitimate government pursuits. … Never mind that they never wanted the government to succeed in the first place and set it up to fail, the failure is proof that we cannot hope for it to succeed.”
                    `
                    A friend of mine compared this to letting people who don’t believe in cars build cars.

                  • Paul says:

                    Nicely said, sir.

                    Were the media even remotely liberal, we’d have heard this one already.

                    • slan agat says:

                      It is shocking to me that the punditry are still going with the conceit that the Bush administration was trying to make government work. Except for the military and intelligence (which it turned against its own people), it has manifestly been trying to keep government from working, in a manner that it is impossible to argue credibly was not deliberate.

              • Tessie says:

                “the surest way to “fight big government” is to bankrupt the nation, preferably with war so that it can be cloaked in patriotism.”
                `
                And then say, “See? Big government doesn’t work”. It’s a well-known strategy informally known as “starve the beast” (see link). It would be political suicide to close down, for example, FEMA, but to defund it so that it collapses on its own is much safer.

                • slan agat says:

                  Exactly, and that is why chickiepickle’s argument falls flat. If the government functions under examination weren’t important, it wouldn’t be political suicide to close them down, now would it?

        • Scum says:

          The point I was trying to make?

          Neocons – evil (Ok, that wasn’t in the original point, but I’ll add it here)

          Republicans – corrupt

          Democrats – less evil, less corrupt; try to be ‘fair’ to everyone to the point where nothing gets done.

          As for the tax comment, I’d rather see the tax laws rewritten and simplified to the point where it’s harder to make a mistake than it is to get it right. Everyone talks about it, but no one does anything about it.

          • rhorho says:

            I’m with you on the tax simplification.

            The labels are broad-brush fails. You seem more intelligent than this,
            somehow.

            • Scum says:

              First rhorho, thank you for the compliment.

              Second, of course you are correct. That brush is wide enough to paint a barn wall with one swipe. This is the internet, and the hyperbole was intentional. I do however believe that the foundation of the statements is accurate. Every stereotype has a basis in reality. Inaccurately applying that to everyone in the referenced group is what makes it a stereotype.

              • rhorho says:

                Then we’re agreed. So, party labels aside, where do you find
                yourself on the political descriptive spectrum?

                For myself, I go with “Left-Wing Nut-Job,” also a barn-painter,
                but fine tuning happens enough in the thick of battle.

                • Scum says:

                  ‘Nut-job’ works for me for a political affiliation. 30 years ago I was a Republican, believed in sky-ghosts and voted for RR the first time. During his first term I realized I had a brain just aching to be used, so that’s what I’ve tried to do ever since; I’m not sure if I’ve always been successful. I’ve been a registered Dem since ‘84(or thereabouts), but have voted Republican when that party had the better person for the job in question.

                  If the Republican party were still the party of 50 years ago, if they had not let themselves be taken over by the vacuous, world-domination seeking religious reich in this country, I might actually be a Republican today. The old Republican party was nothing like they are today. They actually believed in ethics instead of pretending to. They believed in smaller government instead of pretending to. They believed in not attempting to legislate personal behavior. They were financially conservative and socially liberal (in the sense that they understood that government is not and can not be your moral compass).

                  I am still a Dem because they are less evil; less-effective, but less evil.

                  Speaking of using a fine brush, have you seen this?
                  youtube. com/ watch?v=cdGJxSDgWlo

                  (kill the spaces in the url to get it to work.)

                  • rhorho says:

                    Cool! I’m so glad that guy found a way to express
                    himself artistically, but I hate how frustrating his work
                    is. His tale of breathing in Alice made me laugh. Do
                    you think snorting her forced him on a trip through
                    the looking glass? Thanks for that!

                    Oh, BTW, if you want to include a link in with your post,
                    you can paste it, as is, into the field marked “URI.”
                    The field is just above the larger field where you type
                    your comment. Then, your name will be blue. People
                    need only click your name for the link. you can add
                    links in the comment area, too, but sometimes doing so
                    causes a delay in the appearance of your post on the
                    thread. I added your link under my name for demon-
                    stration.

                    • Scum says:

                      I suppose if his medium of choice was a rock of crack, then yes, he may have gone through the looking glass.

                      Thanks for the tip on the linking. I figured that out later and have been using it to link to my page here, but I’ve also since seen others using it in the way you described, so I’ll keep that in mind for future posts.

                      Thanks!

                      • rhorho says:

                        I didn’t mean to ignore all that you posted about
                        your political history. I think you’ll be in good
                        company (save a few trolls) here. You have the
                        benefit of insight from different angles, so it’s
                        great to have you aboard!

          • Uncle Fester says:

            Democrats – Less evil?

            They’re politicians, dammit! They’d roofie their mother and sell her to coked-up frat boys if they thought they’d get one more minute in power. Same as anyone else who goes for elected office.

            • ubr says:

              so we should go back to a divine monarchy
              i hear lots of complaining about how everyone and everything is corrupt and the system runs poorly, but still not even a single iota of thought towards a solution…

              • Uncle Fester says:

                No, we don’t but you’re an idiot and probably can’t find your own arse with both hands without help…

                And I’m not in this to solve problems… if I wanted to solve problems I’d not be posting on a satire site, now would I? Hmm? Try wrrappin gyour tiny, reptile, brain around that one…

                • ubr says:

                  my point exactly.
                  .
                  when someone disagrees with you or forces you to take a stand you just attempt to insult them. the good thing is that your insults are barb less and strikingly similar to the kinds of things you hear from 8 year olds.
                  .
                  so… go on being so intelligent that you cannot hold a conversation with anyone.

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    Then enjoy the warm, wet, feeling of being vindicated in your own mind.

                    I still haven’t seen anything form you that’s worht taking seriously… unless it’s current firearms knowledge… You’ve impressed me with that…

                    as to the rest; its the usual, dim, parochial, expansionist, cookie-cutter nonsense I’ve spent most of my professional life listing to from your big island.

                    you’re not actually worth conversing with… only mocking.

              • Don’t expect one. It’s easier to complain and say they are all corrupt than to address the paradox that we put them into power so we can have a scapegoat for our own failings. We can’t have a leader without politics because that is essentially what happens with power, it becomes political. We live in a world of gray and expect black and white.

                But yea, I am just babbling now. I need to nom more caffeine.

                • ubr says:

                  i figured as much from fester after reading his other posts, but i wanted to see what kind of reaction i could get out of him… and the reaction i got was pretty much what i expected. lots of talk about how everyone else is stupid…

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  The paradox is easily addressed – you vote for the one whose lies you like best.
                  However, that doesn’t make them any more trust worthy or less likely to void their bowels on you from a great height. If someone tells me that
                  Obama’s pee has a lemony freshness and he makes St Francis look like a footpad, I’ll tell them exactly what I think… same with the ones who seem to think that the Republicans walk on water…

                  You got a problem with that Wurm?

                  • ubr says:

                    here i’ll agree with you… all politicians around the globe are paid to tell you one thing to your face and do another behind your back… if we wanted honest people to run our governments we would set up a system that actually rewarded honesty instead of deceit…

                  • Mostly just headdesking at our We are our Problem scenario.

                    I don’t begrudge a politician just because. We the people supposed asked him to fill the office and he does the best he can. If his best sucks, sure, hate him. Hating him on principle of filling a position we asked him to fill… Just gives me a headache.

                    I feel the same way about soldiers. We send them to hell and then fuss if something horrible happens. I get mad if there is a screw up but I don’t blame them just because they are soldiers.

                    But yea, I am babbling us in a circle.

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      Respect is earned…

                    • Tessie says:

                      “I don’t begrudge a politician just because. We the people supposed asked him to fill the office and he does the best he can. If his best sucks, sure, hate him. Hating him on principle of filling a position we asked him to fill… Just gives me a headache.”
                      `
                      Agree in general, but…
                      As others have pointed out, the qualities that make a person fit to govern and the qualities that make a person likely to win a political office are becoming increasingly mutually exclusive.

            • Paul says:

              The generally correct Fester wrote “Same as anyone else who goes for elected office.”.

              That’s not true. I give you for one shining example the best of all Senators, Wisconsin’s Russ Feingold. He’s not alone, though there aren’t many of them.

              It IS possible to have responsible and moral representation. It’s just very difficult. The sex-and-race obsessed Democrats and American Taliban Republicans do hold most of the cards.

        • PortlandMark says:

          He hired someone to do his taxes for him. Y’know, free market and all that. The tax preparer signed a statement saying our nominee didn’t need to pay self-employment taxes. When it was pointed out the preparer was wrong, the late taxes were paid. All good, no?

          • Beth says:

            Didn’t Bush use that excuse for invading Iraq? And look how much leniency you gave him for THAT!

            • PortlandMark says:

              Your comment makes no sense. If Bush had removed the troops and paid a lot of money to the Iraqis after he found the lack of WMD, you might be in the ball park, however.

            • paying back taxes = lives lost in war?

              Where is this planet you’re from again?

            • ubr says:

              the point beth was trying to make… (but not effectively) is that if you made lots of self-employed income and someone told you that you owed no taxes would you believe them? if someone told you that iraq had wmds but no proof, except for the when he gassed the kurds, would you believe them?
              .
              either way, they both were stupid for taking such important things on faith alone.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                You missed out that the stuff they gassed the Kurds with was sold to them by the US (more of the US making the world a better place, I presume), so, yes, they knew exactly how many WMD they had (around the time of the ’super gun’ and the dead Canadian)… but that was over a decade before the current adventure, which was based on known falsified information and and undergraduate thesis someone found on the internet…

                • ubr says:

                  just to clarify, the line about the gas and kurds was to dispel anyone who would reply stating that “THEY HAD WMDS THEY USED THEM AGAINST THE KURDS!”
                  .
                  and no. i don’t trust anyone that much with money or lives. and i do check my own accounting… and c’mon… if you made $150k in a year and your accountant told you that you didn’t owe any taxes would you believe him? you might be unfamiliar with US self-employed taxation, but you have to file and pay your 1099 taxes quarterly, it is not automatically deducted from your paycheck like it is with wage-earners…

              • Uncle Fester says:

                And you’re more likely to believe an accountant than you are a spook…

                Or do you send your accounts out for a second opinion every time…

                • froofrou says:

                  But we want this guy to run the damn Treasury department? Hmmm.

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    since when did mathematical ability have anything to do with the ability to run the treasury?

                    I’ve said for years (since Thatcher’s time to be exact) if you tried to run a business like they run a country, you’d be on the street before year end…

                    • froofrou says:

                      I’m agreeing with you! Dammit!!!! *sulks off to the grocery*

                      • froofrou says:

                        TBH, not being able to do math or understand tax laws isn’t a problem for working in the government. But, if you went to church, would you want the preacher who was screwing young boys to tell you how to get to heaven, or the one who actually lives what he preaches? You want the guy to actually get the concept before you put him in charge.

                        • pittypat says:

                          You two just need to have sex already.
                          Sheesh :P

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          TBH, not being able to do math or understand tax laws isn’t a problem for working in the government. But, if you went to church, would you want the preacher who was screwing young boys to tell you how to get to heaven, or the one who actually lives what he preaches? You want the guy to actually get the concept before you put him in charge.

                          You’d think that… doesn’t work that way…

            • Tessie says:

              “Didn’t Bush use that excuse for invading Iraq?”
              `
              Analogy fail. When you have your taxes done by a professional, you take their advice. b*sh’s advisors told him ahead of time that there was no credible evidence of WMDs in Iraq, no connection between Iraq and 9/11, no intelligence to support the war (pun not intended), and insufficient resources to conduct a successful invasion/occupation. He basically told them to f*ck off, that he was going to do what he felt like, and to distort or cherry-pick the evidence and then lie about it on national television.

              • rhorho says:

                Exactly! Bush told the CIA what he wanted to see on his desk
                from them. That would be like me telling my accountant how
                much tax money I intended to pay, then forcing him to create
                a tax return ending with the figure I told him in advance.

            • Paul says:

              Er, perhaps you’re choosing to ignore the fact that Bush spent the end of 2002 and the beginning of 2003 lying over and over again, both personally and through numerous surrogates speaking for the administration, in support of his efforts to wage war against Iraq.

              You can try to rewrite history and pretend that Bush was honestly mislead, but the fact of the matter is that anyone – ANYONE – could easily tell during those months that Bush was lying for the purpose of justifying his war intentions.

              You can pretend that you believed him, but unless you’re completely dead to the world around you, you couldn’t miss the fact that he was lying. Retroactively pretending that we didn’t know that isn’t going to work, because I am going to remind you: we all knew at the time that he was lying, and of course we turned out to be right.

              Deal with it.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      As I’ve said before, he’s choosing from a bunch of politicians, worse; American Politicans.

      If he eliminated everyone who had a skeleton in their closet of some sort, he’d be on his own.

      • ubr says:

        yes, british politicians are much better at… um… doing something… not really sure what it is though… but they sure do look spiffy in their wigs and capes…

        • Uncle Fester says:

          UK politcos are cheaper and have less chance of damaging the rest of the world.

          • ubr says:

            wow. you’re really pining away for the return of the british empire… remember, they f—-ed up a lot of the world in the last couple centuries…

            • Seth says:

              Just the opposite, I think. The Brits have learned their lesson and given up their dreams of empire, thus they have less of a chance of damaging the rest of the world than we do.

              • ubr says:

                the point your making is that it’s better to be powerless and watch the world burn?

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  Ah, the white man’s burden comes to the fore again from our little Teddy Roosevelt wannabe there

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  and as an addendum, American Interventionism has managed to ignite more fires than it’s put out… but those who refuse to learn the lessons of history are doomed to repeat them…

                  I still think it’s some sort of lingering inadequacy for not being the ones to carpet bomb Dresden…

        • Steve says:

          That and they not only realized that their Social Security system was flawed, but they DID SOMETHING about it!

          We know ours is broken, but we continue to drive it down the street praying that the wheels don’t fall off!

          • PortlandMark says:

            I’ll fix it for you tomorrow: remove the income cap on Social Security taxes. Alternately, if that’s too radical for you, then only institute it on income over, say, a million dollars a year. Either way, the wealthy pay their fair share and SS is fixed for another generation.

            • Paul says:

              If you’re a politician and you propose that, you’re targeted for having proposed a tax hike, which is apparently one of two unforgivable sins that politicians can commit (the other is making racist or sexist comments). You will find that you are no longer in office after the next election (and quite possibly earlier, in light of the wave of recall elections).

              Exercise for the reader: identify national-level politicians in the U.S. who have gone public with proposals to remove the income cap on Social Security. You’ll be looking at a list of politicians who have put their nation ahead of their own self interest. I suspect it’ll be a short list, and I bet I’d be surprised at some of the names on it.

      • chickiepickle says:

        you think he doesn’t have a skeleton in his closet? Let’s wait and see…:) Something will come up from some time in his life that will shed light. And when it does….BAM he’s only human! OMG he’s not a messiah? Oh. Well. Ok. Whatever.

        • Tessie says:

          “BAM he’s only human! OMG he’s not a messiah?”
          `
          Debunked repeatedly in previous threads. Try harder.

        • Uncle Fester says:

          He’s just becoem president asn has been involved in Illinois politics… he has a WWI graveyard’s worth of bodies. However, unless he’s stupid, he’s not goingn to fire himself for it, is he? God’s stripes and wounds, but we seem to have a new influx of low calibre idiots and loudmouthed morons, completely devoid of wither wit or originality.

          Have you considered being euthanised? Medical science needs to know how you live in something that small and still function highly enough to use the internet

          • chickiepickle says:

            You know, you need to learn some manners. I don’t plan to teach you -you appear to be arrogant and impotent, and probably short. at least i know how to type and hit the keys properly…

            sometimes short, concise answers are less incriminating toward a poster than long-winded, offensive ones. Mine was meant to be taken with humor.

            Do you really get your rocks off by posting unnecessary vile retorts? Do i need to type long words (verisimilitude….for instance) for you to bother your superior, weary eyes to read my post? Or do I just need to ask you to please go shut your head in a car door repeatedly until you can behave nice around the neighbors?

            • pdq says:

              Mmmm, luv, you may want to read and then read some more. Unc has a concise way about him, and a fine disregard for sides. As for the rest of your noise, is that all you got for ammo??

              *hands Unc a pack of matches*
              You have the gascan?
              *runs for the bunker pulling helmet low over eyes*

            • Uncle Fester says:

              Valid comment about the typing. Unreserved apologies.

              As to the content. Get on some big girl panties!

  10. steroid says:

    Not good thoughts. . . not thoughts that aren’t based in socialism. . . not thoughts about American exceptionalism. . . not thoughts about helping the country if it damages his poll ratings. . . but thoughts.

    • charro says:

      Dirty thoughts.
      With a penis.
      In bed.

    • PiMan says:

      I recommend you research socialism, and then compare them to all of Obama’s promises. Then compare them to the policies of conservatives in Scandinavia if you have the time.
      .
      Notice how Obama is extremely far from socialism? Its true!

      • Mike says:

        Yeah…right…. (maintains eye contact with crazy person while backing up)

      • Tessie says:

        Not that I disagree with any of your statements, but… Research? Compare? Rational thought? This is roid you’re responding to. Not gonna happen.

      • steroid says:

        Let’s put it this way: Maybe wealth redistribution and high progressive taxes and crippling economic regulations and government spending both to stimulate the economy and for the people’s “own good” isn’t socialism. And maybe Obama isn’t a socialist. But whatever those policies add up to, he’s it.

        • PiMan says:

          You are almost entirely correct. Correct enough that I won’t bother correcting you where you are wrong.

          • Uncle Fester says:

            THe fact he’s stating “Obama’s stated policies are the stated policies of Obama” really makes him hard to disagree with… except are those Obama’s stated policies?

        • Paul says:

          “Let’s put it this way: Maybe wealth redistribution and high progressive taxes and crippling economic regulations and government spending both to stimulate the economy and for the people’s “own good” isn’t socialism. And maybe Obama isn’t a socialist. But whatever those policies add up to, he’s it.”

          High progressive taxes – nope. Pay attention to the REAL news, not the Fox News broken record. At most, he proposed allowed Bush’s tax cuts to expire. That’s not remotely establishing high progressive taxes. Look at the history of the highest marginal tax rate. You’ll find it revealing: the Fox “the sky is falling!” whining is just childish fantasy, not surprisingly.

          Crippling economic regulations – nope. Have you perchance been asleep for the past year? This particular piece of right-wing whining is thoroughly refuted.

          Government spending to stimulate the economy – yes. And of course he’s right about that. Failure to do so would be tragic in the short-term.

          Government spending “for the people’s own good” – yes, and he’s right again. And of course every Republican president in modern history is also on board with this, though they tend to have very different ideas about what “for the people’s own good” means.

          • rhorho says:

            I appreciate your point-by-point rebuttal, but, boiled down, steroid
            isn’t able to see past his Kool-Aid haze.

            In related news, have you heard that right-wingers can now receive
            a Limbaugh-O’Reilly-Coulter cocktail via IV drip?

          • steroid says:

            “Allowing tax cuts to expire” – euphamism for raising taxes. Not being taxed is the natural state; taxes are government interference. Obama doesn’t view low taxes as an end in itself, and that’s what I disagree with.

            In fact, that’s my sole complaint here. Not the policy, but the principle. Obama doesn’t believe in small government, the free market, individualism, getting rich, and all the libertarian politico-economic ideas that I do. I don’t care if his policies help the nation by his or anyone else’s standards. I have my own and they’re not his.

            • Uncle Fester says:

              ah, the refreshing breath of ‘leave the wounded and run’ laissez faire economics of the loud idiot…

              The thing is, I’d lay money on you being a retarded pauper who eats cold bean and clips coupons while claiming the government largess you claim to despise…

              • steroid says:

                Calling me an idiot does not disprove my point.

                And please do lay money on that; I’m fine with taking money from others who want to give it.

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  Who was sying anything about your ‘point’ (which I’ve yet to fully
                  decipher – I think it’s proving you’re mostly crazy)?

                  and from the level of posting – I’d say it’s like dear old Sammy-Joe… dreaming the American dream while other people get rich off your work… when you’re not claiming welfare

                  • steroid says:

                    “Sanity is not statistical” -George Orwell

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      “In times of universal deceit, telling the truth will be a revolutionary act.”

                      Old George had your sort pegged… every comment a new deceit…

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        and as to the rest of your faeculance… I’d point you a Jean Genet (who’s French, so you’re not allowed to quote him after Gulf War II, being a
                        ‘patriot’)

                        “Tout homme aime l’odeur de ses pets”

                      • steroid says:

                        What deceit? I’m simply stating what I want. I’m not saying that laissez nous faire is going to keep us at the current level of prosperity or procide any specific benefit. I suspect it maximizes economic advancement, but that’s not my motivation. I am saying that laissez nous faire is the only fair and just system, and that even if it resulted in no prosperity, it should be implemented because of that. Whom have I deceived and how?

                        • PiMan says:

                          If that is the case, then it tells me that fair and just should not be the end goal. The end goal of society should be prosperity for the people, and if laissez faire is not going to get us there then it is not the system we should use.

                        • steroid says:

                          Which is a matter of value and of choice. But it remains the fact that I am not permitted in any way to avoid the state’s confiscation of my property or life at will, which I mark as a criminal act, which authorizes me to take action in retalliation.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          I think you’ll find you’re in a minority… We’ll come laugh at you in jail….

                        • steroid says:

                          So you’re criminals who are justified in your own minds. That’s fine, but don’t expect me to agree with you.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          No, actually, you’re the one making threats, and saying “a fie on your laws, and let each man be his own judge” like some low rent Anarchist…, so I’d say we’re just waiting for you die in a hail of FBI gun fire…

                          but please… tell us more of your dastardly pan Emperor Ming…

                        • steroid says:

                          “Don’t attack me or I’ll attack you back” isn’t a threat; it’s a principle.

                        • FaileV says:

                          it’s a strikingly flawed principle. it leads in an endless circle of violence

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          and so, what, other than using a mix of gas and weed killer on a federal building, are you planning?

                          And I think that Law Enforcement would see that as a threat…

                        • steroid says:

                          Tax avoision.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          The got scarface on tax evasion, but one must ponder how close the federales are to someone whose wit can’t manage to spell “evasion” or worse, thinks the etymological root of the word is common with ‘avoid’

                        • steroid says:

                          . . . or has watched The Simpsons.

                        • Scum says:

                          @steroid

                          Don’t worry about Fester. Avoision is a perfectly cromulent word.
                          You embiggen us with your wisdom.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Ah, steroid is back to peddle crazy like it’s going out of style and prove once more he has the depth and breadth of a de-cerebrated gnat…

      Do they really let people with that limited capacity near things that can break into sharp edges?

    • Steve says:

      SOCIALISIM – OMG – SCARY WORD!!!

      Meanwhile the Bush administration has nationalized the financial sector…

      I love how people think by using the word socialism, they have automatically won any disagreement or debate.

      • FaileV says:

        that’s because the people that use it to win a debate, aren’t entirely sure how to effectively debate a subject

      • Tessie says:

        “I love how people think by using the word socialism, they have automatically won any disagreement or debate.”
        `
        It’s because they’re dimly aware that “pinko” and “commie” don’t have the scare value that they used to. Then again, they’re dimly aware of most things…

  11. Mike says:

    More like ” How the Heck am I gonna keep all of those Campaign Promises?”

  12. nicanfhilidh says:

    “Aaaaahhhhh … that last fart was a truly religious experience.”

  13. Uncle Fester says:

    Yond Cassius has a lean and hungry look; he thinks too much: such men are dangerous.

  14. Present says:

    He’s thinking about one of the following:

    1) Whether the President still gets to vote “Present”
    2) Baby killing
    3) If Rahm will be as bad to him as Cheney was to Bush

      • Present says:

        I thought it was pretty self-explanatory, actually…

        • phaelin says:

          Self-explanatory, sure. It was also completely idiotic, and that’s not another matter. I’m really disappointed if that’s all you can manage to come up with. The “Present” issue died quite a while back, baby killing is just a fundy propaganda buzz-word, and Rahm (while I don’t much care for him) is not Joe Biden, so that’s hardly a good enough parallel.

          • Noob says:

            Just a thought, so don’t rip my head off, okay?
            I totally support right to choose, and did so myself as a terrified teen, but now that I have a great life, job, hubby and fam, I have come to realize that it really is the death of a person. I’ve also counseled (not professionally, mind you, but as a part of my career choice) young people considering the option. Some have opted to follow through with it, others haven’t, but I continue to support whatever is right for their lives.
            Please don’t just unilaterally dismiss it as a fundy buzz-word. “Baby killer” is meant as a slam, and it works for shock effect. But the fact one realizes it is a person (eventually) is real, does have painful ramifications that ripple throughout one’s life. I look at my sons and daughters and can’t help but be regretful. Not that I am suggesting others should do so, just offering anecdotal evidence.
            Again, not ripping on, or trying to undermine, anyone’s politics or belief system. I just want anyone considering abortion, or who has undergone one, to make sure they have the support they will ultimately need one day. And I also want those who call it “baby killing”, or those who dismiss it as a “a fundy propaganda buzz-word,” to take into consideration the effects those words have on others who have exercised their legal right to choose.

            • rhorho says:

              Here, “baby killer” directly relates to a right-wing smear tactic
              that failed. Obama was falsely accused of writing legislation that
              would teach young children sex education. The right-wing
              extremists clung to the buzz-word tightly, despite all evidence to
              the contrary. The use of the buzz-word has nothing to do with any
              concern about or respect the serious, difficult nature of unwanted
              pregnancies. Phaelin was totally correct in dismissing the term
              out of hand.

              That said, your plea was sincere, and respectful. If anyone
              trashes you, please just consider the source.

              • rhorho says:

                ^respect *for* the

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  When people grizzle at me for my opinion on that subject, I just point out that I’m less pro-choice and more anti-life… that confuses them no end, and while they’re struggling not to have an aneurysm, I can make my escape… :¬>

                  Apropos little, but I thought I’d share.

                  • Noob says:

                    That’s a perfect response, Uncle Fester.
                    Thanks.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Baffling the opponent is a time-honored tradition. Thank
                    you for the idea. I’ve been going with calling the other
                    side “Anti Choice.” The ones I’ve used it on don’t seem
                    to like it. They pretty much don’t like anything they
                    haven’t been taught to call themselves, though.

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      I call them ‘anti-choice’ too… since they’re really not ‘pro’ anything, unless you count the death penalty

                      • charro says:

                        See now why is the Death Penalty legal but assisted suicide is not? The criminals “deserve” to die and the people in pain… don’t? They don’t deserve a painless end to their pain but we can FORCE someone into being killed?
                        *disclaimer: It is not up to me to dictate who gets the death penalty nor the ethics of it. But I think it is pure hypocrisy to kill people for killing people and turn around and say “Suicide, and ASISSTED suicide, is immoral, wrong and illegal”.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          You answered your question – hypocrisy.

                        • charro says:

                          Damn you and your logic.

                        • Tessie says:

                          “See now why is the Death Penalty legal but assisted suicide is not? ”
                          `
                          A former classmate of mine had a spouse on life support after a catastrophic car accident. The doctors advised against pulling the plug. She ran out of money. The doctors pulled the plug. The guy died just like he would have anyway, but had a few weeks longer to suffer and deteriorate.
                          ???

                        • I’m generally in favor of suicide and assisted suicide being legal, but would add the caveat that the world is full of a$$holes who would gladly stop feeding Great-Uncle Roy whether he likes it or not if they thought they could get anything out of it. I guess what I’m saying is there needs to be some objective criteria.

                        • charro says:

                          @Tessie ??? indeed. That doesn’t seem right..

                        • Jane St.Clair says:

                          @Tessie: You mean a few weeks longer to milk money out of a grief-stricken spouse?

                        • Tessie says:

                          Yeah, she actually ended up having to declare bankruptcy on top of all the other stress. Nice, huh?

                        • rhorho says:

                          Well, at least her money went to doctors and
                          hospitals, who support the AMA and various
                          insurance companies with powerful lobbyists.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Now, now… the American system is the best in the world. They tell you this and they wouldn’t lie to you…

                          The land of the free to die when the money runs out… nice…

                        • charro says:

                          I know! Totally! Each year my company has been kind enough to raise our prices AND reduce the coverage!! I love it so much because now I pay more money from my check AND more money at the Doctor! Thank god I’m on so many drugs that I get to take FULL advantage of this!!!

                      • AC says:

                        Well, I’m against (most) abortions as well as the death penalty…

              • Noob says:

                Apologies. I honestly didn’t know about the legislation issue. I pride myself on my interest and ability to stay abreast of current events, but apparently missed that one, or if I heard about it, it was dismissed out of hand.
                And I don’t see a problem educating young children about the realities of their bodies. We don’t have “hoo-hoos” or “haw-haws” in my house. We have penises and vaginas that are used, at the appropriate age, in the appropriate manner, to procreate and for pleasure. I don’t see that as a problem.
                But what do I know, except for the fact that I am educating and caring for the upcoming generation and could honestly use all the wisdom and support I can get.
                Thanks for your thoughtful response, and I’ll take anything I get with a grain.

              • charro says:

                OH MY GOD OBAMA WANTS TO TEACH OUR CHILDREN SEX EDUCATION?!?!?!!! That is SO wrong on SO many levels. I mean, abstinence is the ONLY sex ed a child should EVER learn and they should learn it from their PARENTS on their 18th birthday (because before that the kid won’t even know what sex is). Teaching children to be responsible and safe is garbage! Sex is evil and dirty and if we teach children how to be responsible they will start to have UNRESPONSIBLE SEX!!! If we give them condoms, there will be more teenage pregnancies and more of these terrible baby killings!!!!!! If we teach them safe practices we will be sending them to the Devil’s own bedroom!!!!
                Sarah Palin is right, abstinence only education is the way to go!!
                Look how well it worked for her daughter…….

              • froofrou says:

                FYI, the ‘baby-killing’ thing was due to the fact that he was against legislation in the Illinois Senate that would allow an actual doctor to save a baby born in spite of a late term abortion. If the baby, now out of the womb, was alive, the legislation said that a doctor needed to step in and save the baby. Obama voted against it three times, on the premise that Roe v. Wade would be infringed upon. When the legislation was changed to protect Roe V. Wade, he still voted against it, saying that the intent was the death of the baby, so not letting it die after birth was a violation of the woman’s rights.
                -
                No judgement calls here, I really don’t feel like fighting right now, but that’s where the ‘baby-killer’ label came from.

                • rhorho says:

                  I cleared that up above, with two links. I was confusing
                  right-wing attacks. The mud bombs were being slung fast
                  and furious at that time, as the polling numbers didn’t
                  tighten after the conventions, and the economy was
                  teetering on the brink.

            • slan agat says:

              You have my respect, both for your perspective on what you’ve been through and the way you express it.

              Of course you realize that this is an intensely personal and difficult subject, as does anyone who’s had to face it. You seem able to keep in mind as well that expressing your concerns the way you’ve expressed them can be perceived as talking down to women in much the way society has for just about ever – telling them what they can and can’t handle, imposing external judgment upon their ability to make mature decisions and deal with their emotional ramifications.

              I know that wasn’t your intent. But even in the Supreme Court, the argument has been resorted to that women must be restricted in choosing abortion because of the emotional issues and need for therapy they’d be letting themselves in for. It’s a patronizing, infantilizing argument when leveraged inappropriately.

              • charro says:

                I think it is pathetic how people think the government should tell us how to handle our personal affairs. It comes down to “I don’t like what you are doing/going to do/have done, so I think there should be a law against it”. Unfortunately people like that (may be the majority I don’t know) do not speak for everyone. Gay marriage anyone?
                While I can understand the argument “Life begins at conception” and the feelings behind it, a woman has the right to not subject herself OR THE UNBORN child to a life that could/would become infinitely more difficult.
                I’m not sure if this happened or if it was just a discussion but I read an article once about women being locked up and forced into sobriety because they were pregnant and being an addict “harmed the unborn child”. I know people feel that drug addicts should be locked up and forced to give birth so there are no abortions. I find this absolutely preposterous and isn’t there something called “wrongful imprisonment” and “cruel and unusual punishment”?
                It seems to me that people who want to make abortion illegal think that women are good for one thing: to produce babies. You’re right slan, it IS infantalizing. “Aww, isn’t that cute. You think you have the right to make your own decisions about procreation!”
                I don’t agree with the argument “Oh you’re pro-baby killing”. I am most certainly NOT. But I am all for allowing a human being to choose how to conduct their private affairs. I think what people DON’T realise, is that if we do ban abortion we will have a situation where women are now putting their lives in danger to terminate the pregnancy. Back alley abortions, recklessness (like purposely trying to force a miscarriage) and so forth would happen. Women, and their unborn children, will die. And when they do, the same people who say abortion is wrong will say they deserved it for attempting to kill their unborn child. Hypocrisy, FTW. No sanctity of life there….
                Sorry if this post is incoherent I am not feeling well.

                • charro says:

                  You know, it’s like the whole “assisted suicide” debate. “Awww.. Isn’t that cute. You think that since you’re confined to a bed and poop and pee into tubes you have the right to painlessly end your life”.
                  Or the “persistent vegetative state” argument. “Awwww isn’t that cute. You think that since your loved one has been in a coma for 12 years and has now suffered atrophy of brain and body that we should pull the plug”. The argument should ALWAYS be “Quality of life” and NOT “Quanitity of life”. If you haven’t seen that movie “Million Dollar Baby” see it. It illustrates my point perfectly.

                  • froofrou says:

                    After what my grandmother went through, I am firmly in the assisted suicide camp.

                    • rhorho says:

                      A lot of people talk out of hand about the topic, with-
                      out trying to empathize with what the dying person
                      and the family have to endure. Most of the people
                      who rail against the notion haven’t been in your
                      family’s situation. Trouble is, they don’t understand
                      how lucky they are.

                      • charro says:

                        When I was a wee lass, my paternal grandma died, and my paternal grandpa (who had polio) killed himself shortly there after. Once I became old enough to understand what suicide is, I thought it was very sad but in an oddly touching manner. He was so dependent on her that he did not want to live his life without her. I can fully understand that, even for those who are not confined to a wheelchair.
                        Even if I didn’t understand, it’s not my say so who wants to end their own pain (physical or mental) in a painless fashion. Even though it may be hard on loved ones, it would be much harder to see someone you love go through pain every single day until they die “naturally”.
                        My thoughts are with you froo.

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        From the ‘pulling the plug’ POV… my personal experience is that having the balls to do does not equate to having the stomach to do it…

                        Having said that, if I had to do it again, I would, despite the fall out .

                    • viking gal says:

                      Charro, you were totally coherent in your posts. First of all, I read a couple articles about women who WERE put in jail to keep them ‘clean’ during the pregnancies. And I have read an article in a legal journal regarding the ‘pluses and minuses’ of that sort of incarceration. Scary.
                      Second, as the daughter of a nurse who practiced pre-Roe v Wade, your description of the results of illegalizing abortion sounds just like her recollections of Emergency room practice.
                      And as someone who was at her father’s death bed just a couple years ago, if I could have pushed a button to further ease his passing, I would have.

                  • Interloper says:

                    +1

                    I agree with everything you have said here, and I think you expressed it very well in fact. As Uncle Fester said in reference to “pulling the plug” I know that I personally could not and would not have an abortion. Then again, I’ve never been in a position to have to make that decision, nor will I ever make that decision for someone else. I am not pro-abortion as some right-wingers try to paint it, but I am pro-choice, meaning it is the choice of the people involved. And just as you said, outlawing it will not stop it, but will only send women to back alleys with wire coat hangers and worse.

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      Least you know that you’ve not ridden the trail to try and take the moral high ground… that’s a helluvalot. It’s surprising how people get all high and mighty when you’ve had to kill a loved one (which, with the best will in the world is how it feels… even when you’re keeping the promises made to them)

                • Kuromisa says:

                  Wow…Char, that was amazing. You pretty much covered all my opinions on abortion in one post. All I can say is, seconded.

            • *hugs* (No comment necessary.)

            • I sympathize as Lynn and I nearly made the same choice with Mikey. I look at him and realize what I could have condoned and it breaks my heart. I don’t pretend to dictate the choice of a woman over her own body but it is a weighty choice to make. It is pretty much the middle ground I take in any of the Abortion debates. I think it should be an option but I also posit that it is a grave option not to be taken lightly and that the majority of people who take that option don’t take it lightly.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                I’ve never met anyone who took it ‘lightly’… it’s a myth that people dance into the clinic singing ‘The Sun HAs Got His Hat On’, or leaves it singing ‘Sweet Mystery of Life’…

                • charro says:

                  As with ANY system, there are people who abuse it and take advantage and don’t properly consider a choice before making it. But in the abortion clinic, those people are the minority. Women who go there are scared for themselves, scared for their unborn child, scared of the reason they got pregnant, etc.
                  Many women regret it, but I think most will acknowledge it was the right choice at the time. We can only play the hands we’re dealt and UF is right.. It’s not something women just shrug off. It is a decision process that isn’t taken lightly.

                  • AC says:

                    I sometimes think that maybe if girls had more help and information about childcare, ways to complete their education, what to do with a kid etc. As well as pregnancy not being treated as a terrible curse -then it would hold a lot less terror and perhaps wouldn’t lead to a lot of girls making a decision which they often regret and feel guilty about.

                    • charro says:

                      I agree. Education (like I said) is the answer.
                      Perhaps if more young women and men were more educated about sex, there would be less teen pregnancies.
                      Perhaps if there were better education, there would be less impoverished (hey a girl can dream, right?) people who can’t afford a pregnancy, much less a whole baby.
                      Perhaps if there was more funding two income families would have somewhere for their baby to go while they are at work.
                      Perhaps if there were better benefits (for all people) a woman could take off more time from work during her pregnancy without losing income and doesn’t have to worry about things like having to eat for two for 9 months when she can barely afford to eat for one.
                      Perhaps if there was more aid women could get tip-top medical care and not be worried that they are uninsured and afraid that they can’t take care of themselves during pregnancy.
                      Perhaps if there were more educated people, and we could srpuce up the world and public aid systems, more women (and families) would choose adoption over abortion.
                      Perhaps if there were more education there would be less drug addicts getting pregnant. I know it’s a stereotype, but drinking and doing drugs really can lead to more promiscuous behavior.
                      And maybe, just maybe, if there were more education people would be less “OMG! ABORTION?!?!?!!? You are a monster” and more “It is not up to me to dictate the terms upon which you live your own life”.

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        Another myth – all abortions are third trimester. If you look at the figures, they’re not. The vast bulk are first, and then there’s a faster than exponential decayon the numbers into the second trimester, with slightly about statistical noise on the third trimester. At least, that’s UK figures, based on 03 stats…

                        It’s not a subject I’ve kept my finger on the pulse of since, unless I grow a uterus, it’s not really something I would want to moralise on.

                        • charro says:

                          And, if I’m not mistaken, part of Roe V. Wade has been overturned and it is now illegal to perform 3rd trimester abortions here in the states.
                          Most “abortion clinics” will not do an abortion outside of the first trimester. The abortions performed after that are done for the most part if there is grave danger to the woman or the fetus.

                        • Tessie says:

                          I read a firsthand account of a woman who had a late-term abortion after having her first three pregnancies end in miscarriages. The gist of it was that somewhere around her 6th or 7th month, they discovered a severe malformation that threatened both the fetus/baby’s life and the mother’s life. Granted that she’s one person, it certainly didn’t sound to me like the sort of thing anyone would take lightly.

                        • rhorho says:

                          This *is* a LOL site, so what the heck:

                          According to FOXNews (!), 91% of U.S.
                          abortions are performed during the first
                          trimester.

                          Only 100 (out of 1.6 million) are performed
                          per year during the third trimester.

                          [LINK] to full article.

                      • I find that education in most things, sex, war, abortion, choices, etc would solve a lot of problems. If we know what sex is actually about without freaking out, we can educate it and let people make their own decisions. If we educate about war without the pomp and parade, perhaps we wouldn’t jump into it so fervently. Same for abortion, I find that people who actually feel they have a choice tend not to abort. Having the choice was enough to step up, be a man/woman/cabbage, etc etc and love the child. Of course, all the disclaimers about rape/incest/etc apply.

                        As for the choice part, I find that when you actually know all your choices, you can actually make the best choice. Ignorance is not understanding your choices, thus you choose rashly out of desperation. This is where proproganda comes in, muddying the waters, and thus forcing desperation onto people who might otherwise make a saner choice. An overwhelming number of people don’t wake up wanting to get pregnant, abort a fetus, kill a bunch of people in another country, have their marriage condemned, or whatever else we are whining about. They just lack the information to make the informed choice.

                        If you want to have sex, know the risks and how to lower them. If you get pregnant, know your options and/or your own willingness to handle the task of being a parent. If you are going to abort, make sure you’ve considered all your options. If you’re going to war, make sure it is based on facts not fiction.

                        /rant

                        Crap, I do hope I am not going to do this all damn day…

                        • AC says:

                          No, no, that wasn’t a rant. Just a lot of good points stuck together.

                        • Thank you. I may be a horrid pervert butI believe that if you are going to do something, sex, war, drugs, skin somebody who has wronged you, etc, you should at least do it right and for the right reasons.

                          You only get one body, use it well but use it wisely to get the most use. You only get one mind, use it constantly to get the most from it. You only get one conscience/soul so use it so things won’t haunt you later.

                          Oh and know when to compromise because nothing is ever perfect.

                          /sappy DWN moment.

                • I actually have, although as it wasn’t somebody I knew well it’s possible it was just “whistling in the dark”, so to speak. Creeped me out a little, though.

                • I have an inlaw who has spoken of her seven abortions. I am still trying to wrap my mind around that… Even seriously considering it once was enough to chill my marrow and distance me from Lynn a bit. Luckily, we had an almost cliche’ crying and talking moment in bed and made amends. Though I still get chills when I look at my oldest and think he might not have been.

                  *shudder* I’m getting sincere and sweet. I need caffeine before there is anymore share time.

                  • charro says:

                    See now that’s just disgusting. I mean.. as a sweeping generalisation note. Anyone who has 7 unwanted pregnancies is doing SOMETHING incorrectly. Now, if a person were to have 7 abortions because 7 fetuses are threatening.. I’d think that would be too hard emotionally to have to make that choice 7 times.
                    Your in-law seems to not have a grasp of the term “birth control”.

  15. Unknown says:

    ˆ å©®´´ ∑ˆ†˙ π®´ßˆ∂´˜†⁄  ˆ† ˆß √´®¥ ß´¬ƒ–´≈π¬å˜ˆ†ø®¥≤ ˆ †˙ˆ˜˚. LOL computer speak! Try to figure out what it says. Your reward is feeling good about yourself. How great would that be?!

  16. Jam Jar says:

    ¬ø¬ ∂¨∂´≤ ∑˙冠†˙´ ƒ®ˆç˚ˆ˜© ç®åπ¿¡ ˆ ¬ˆ˚´ †˙ˆß çøµπ¨†´® †å¬˚!

  17. Tessie says:

    I, for one, welcome our new intelligent overlords.
    `
    *waits for someone to fail to get the Simpsons reference and get all hysterical about the word “overlord” in 3… 2… *

  18. ubr_alice says:

    So, he’s president already? Rilly? Wow! I always thought presidents were inaugurated on January 20th. What change! What hope! What utter bull$shit!
    :) <— this is my ‘I love dummycrats’ face.

    • Jam Jar says:

      Dummycrats! yeaaa i would have to agree.

      • Uncle Fester says:

        I think it’s the Republicans spitting the dummy… but, you friendless retard, it’s about all you’re capable of…

        • Beth says:

          For a European, you sure act like a uberLiberal Left Wing Tool! I wouldn’t know where to begin making fun of the House Of lords, much less rabidly pick sides!

          • AC says:

            So, Fester is wrong for being more informed than you?

            • FaileV says:

              No see, she doesn’t have to be more informed, you can’t make fun of the most perfect government ever! Obviously Fester could never actually find fault with the US so he’s just copying those libtards. silly redcoats thinking they know anything about america

          • Seth says:

            The right wing in Europe and the rest of the world would be considered center left here. Obama is fairly right wing by European standards. Americans, especially uneducated right wingers, know nothing of the rest of the world. People like you, Beth, think that America is exceptional and the rest of the world mundane and beneath notice. Unfortunately, America chooses to impose it’s will on the rest of the world, and so our decisions effect others. Is it any wonder they choose to be informed about our politics, and have opinions?

            You know, all you’ve brought to the table are unoriginal insults, stereotypes, and childishness. You’ve added nothing original to the conversation. There are plenty of intelligent, insightful right wingers. You aren’t one of them, and you
            embarrass yourself and your party with your continual grade school insults parroted back from your oh so clever commentators. Even the right wingers here think you are a hindrance to their cause.

            • ubr says:

              seth, you just showed the amount of bigotry you have towards
              americans and therefore have proved that the “uneducated right wingers”
              are right in thinking that the rest of the world is a backwater. when people
              don’t agree with your ideas you claim that they are uneducated. people can be just as intelligent and still come to differing conclusions. if that wasn’t true this world would be a very boring place…
              .
              and YOUR stereotypes of americans are even uglier than beth’s and your insults are even more unoriginal. you keep making the same claims that the world would be a better place if we kept our nose out of things. tell that to the people buried in mass graves in bosnia, cambodia, chile, and etc. the united states has a higher standard of living and more military and economic might than most of the world. with our station in life we have a moral obligation to help make the world a better place.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                No, you have a moral obligation to stay the hell out of the way, you power hungry madman…

                As I’ve said before, American Exceptionalism is exeptional like hanivng a duplicated Chromosome-21 makes one excepetional… it’s not a ‘good’ thing…

                • ubr says:

                  who said anything about american exceptionalism?
                  the point i was trying to make is that stereotyping all americans as holding stereotypes is rather ironic to begin with… but i guess your guile at the power that america holds blinded you.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                and as an addendum – the ‘moral obligation to improve things’ is nothing new.

                It was called ‘the white man’s burden’ back in Kipling’s day of the British Empire. Look at the mess that made… somehow, in the way that America tries to be the stumbling, demented, child king of the world, I don’t see an improvement over what’s gone before…

                • ubr says:

                  yet again, you’d rather no one did anything so that you could be satirical about everything…

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    I think we should keep our noses out of other people’s domestic squabbles…

                    You think that the US has a God given mandate to fix the world so it looks just like America…

                    • ubr says:

                      nope. i don’t think that the US has a God given mandate on anything. What i do believe is that everyone has the responsibility to expose and attempt to correct any and all atrocities committed against any people.
                      .
                      you’re taking it on face value that i agree with the US foreign policy for the last 50 something years… i don’t agree with most of it. but what i will agree with is that when people were being thrown into mass graves and killed simply because they were slightly different than others the US stood up and attempted to do something to stop it. you are correct that this did not always work out well, but i believe that it is better to attempt to destroy great evil than to sit back and watch it engulf the world.

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        Cept the Kurds… but they don’t count…

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Nor do we mention ‘Burundi’…

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          But look at what evil things the English have done for a thousand years- start with Ireland and Scotland. Then throw in Africa, South Africa, the Carribean, India, Afganistan, Austrailia,etc..etc.. etc…….

                        • AC says:

                          @ AF: Hey! Scots can slag the English all they want. Americans don’t get to.
                          Go conduct your sad little vendetta in the playground. I’m sure the other 8-year olds will love you for it.

                        • AC says:

                          …And learn to spell “Australia.”

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Actually the cretin has a point… and I can happily
                          discuss great British horrors
                          He missed our conduct in the Opium War which is one of my favourites…, and the genocide of the Tasmanian aboriginies, which was British lead…

                          Unfortunately the bulk of America’s great dropped bollocks are in the past 60 years, rather than ancient history… so all he’s proving is his esstntial idiocy…

                          I’m happy to dance with our atrocities… the inability to look at one’s country’s monstrosities is a weakness…

                        • AC says:

                          Oh, I’m not being patriotic or anything. I agree: we’re a horrible people. I just don’t like Anti fester. Anyway, it’s the right of a Scot to slag the English. I don’t want him (it’s definitely a “him”) nicking it from me.

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          And how many Americans are of Irish-Scottish descent? Answer- a LOT!
                          There’s no monopoly on picking back at the English. Now, get back to class you little bugger!

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          I hope you’re happy. You just made me
                          pee myself!

              • Tessie says:

                “you keep making the same claims that the world would be a better place if we kept our nose out of things. tell that to the people buried in mass graves in bosnia, cambodia, chile, and etc. … with our station in life we have a moral obligation to help make the world a better place.”
                `
                The “World’s Policeman” argument? Even setting aside the fact that our “station in life” is, well… debtor nation… and even accepting hypothetically that we actually have some sort of moral obligation to mind other nations’ business for them… we have a long and sordid history of consistently backing the wrong side of most, if not all, conflicts. The people in mass graves in, just to name a few, Iraq, Nicaragua, and Vietnam would probably, if they could, wish we had just stayed out of the horse race.

                • ubr says:

                  i’m not arguing for the job of world’s policeman for the US, but rather we, as a nation, should be able to uphold a moral standard for the rest of the world to follow without having to resort to violence…

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    this, I can agree with. However, what you’ve been saying doesn’t mean that…

                    • ubr says:

                      i’ve been trying to say that we need to do something…
                      the what we need to do i’ve been extremely vague on…

                      • OhMyGoodness says:

                        Unfortunately, some have been a lot less vague than you. “We need to do something” is about as eloquent as any of the other excuses to jump into Iraq. The fact that you consider it your country’s business to somehow fix the moral, ethical, governmental or (for all I know) cholesterol-intake dilemmas of other nation-states makes me just a little wary of you, my friend.

                      • Anti Fester says:

                        Well, the UN peacekeeping forces are a joke- why don’t you call them?

                  • Tessie says:

                    You have a valid point but it’s somewhat of a slippery slope. I’m not in favor of standing by while someone else is shooting babies or herding people into camps because “They aren’t coming for me yet, so what do I care?”. That said, the kind of countries who do things like that in the first place aren’t too receptive to another country teaching them ethics by setting a good example.

                  • Danbala says:

                    Being “leading the free world” through good example instead of through force or bullying? I vote “aye”.

              • Seth says:

                I’m sorry, but facts are facts. Americans are woefully uneducated about the rest of the world. It’s not that I’m slamming people who disagree with me, unless you are talking about people who disagree that Africa is actually a continent, not a country.

                Please, elaborate on the ’stereotypes’ I’ve been using. Which stereotypes? How are they unoriginal? Where do I EVER say that we should keep our nose out of things? I agree we should try to make the world a better place. That is kind of a hallmark of liberals in general. I may disagree about HOW we should go ab out it.

                Are you sure you’re not mistaking me for someone else? Because you seem to be accusing me of things that I know for a fact you can not back up with any proof.

                I like that you always jump to the defense of America. I think we are a great nation founded on great ideals. But you need to think about something: a true patriot is like a true friend. A true friend will tell you when you are screwing up. They will still love you, but they will tell you. Get it?

                • Uncle Fester says:

                  There are very few ‘true’ patriots… They’re usually like the Borg…

                • ubr says:

                  seth, you used the phrase “people like you” how is that not a stereotype?

                  • Seth says:

                    Let me give you some advice, ubr, that will help your reading comprehension levels. Read ALL the words, not just some. Here’s what I said, “Americans, especially uneducated right wingers, know nothing of the rest of the world. People like you, Beth, think that America is exceptional and the rest of the world mundane and beneath notice.” Now, how IS this a stereotype? Is ‘Beth-like’ a stereotype now? Below, you agree that we need to work on educational standards and cultural knowledge. That is all I was implying, so, we are in agreement. I never said or implied that Americans were uneducated in general, or even that right wingers are. I just said we tend to be quite parochial. What I IMPLIED was that Beth is an uneducated right winger who knows nothing of the rest of the world.

                    • ubr says:

                      the phrase i latched on to was…
                      .
                      “americans know nothing of the rest of the world.”
                      .
                      but i brain froze when writing…

                      • Seth says:

                        Well, that was a bit of an exaggeration, I admit. But how far from the trth is it, really? I wasn’t saying Americans are stupid, or uneducated in a general sense. I was saying, we are parochial, concerned with local and national issues, and quite unaware, on average, of the rest of the world. Do you know how many Americans can’t even find AMERICA on a globe?

                        • …we are parochial, concerned with local and national issues, and quite unaware, on average, of the rest of the world.

                          Arguably true to some extent, Seth, but I think that’s human nature in a large part and not something that’s really US-specific.

                        • Seth says:

                          True, true. But I have traveled quite extensively in Europe and I found Europeans to be much more knowledgeable about world affairs, in general, than Americans.

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          Then please, please move there immediately. You’ll increase the IQ of both continents when you move !

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          Oh- and since you think Americans are too stupid to be helping other countries and should stay out- what about The Chosen One saying he wanted to send One Trillion in aid to Africa? (start conniption fit now)

                        • Anti Fester says:

                          I made that last part up, because I don’t get
                          any attention from my mother.

                  • Uncle Fester says:

                    Or ‘People like us’… that’s another great phrase used I remember Sen Palin’s marvellous bit of pathetic FUG to a pack of howling Red Necks…’He doesn’t see America like WE see America’ – I think that’s mostly because he’s not cross eyed…

                • ubr says:

                  i strive to be a true patriot… it’s something i’ve been working on for a long time… and i agree with your assessment that our nation needs to work on educational standards and actual cultural knowledge but anytime i hear the argument “american’s are uneducated” it strikes me as bigotry. there are dumb people everywhere. everywhere needs more education. your statement sounds too much like “all americans are stupid.”
                  that was the point i was trying to make…
                  i need some more coffee…

            • Scum says:

              Oh you’re the Seth Beth accused me of being. I was right, from the two posts of yours I’ve seen so far, I do like you.

              I don’t remember the specific details, but there was legislation in Florida a few years ago which would have forced teachers (grade school I believe) to teach that America is the greatest country to have ever existed. Patriotism and pride are fine, but blind, ignorant allegiance is, well, it’s religion.

          • Uncle Fester says:

            No, Beth, you’ve ‘misunderestimated’ me… I think ALL politicians are venal, corrupt and greedy, and interested in extending their own power over my sordid existence. I just happen to think that, based on your near religous zelotry that one political view is the global panacea, that you are as thick as a fence post.

            But feel free to lace in to the Lords… I’ll help with pointers. Having said that, the Lords HAVE broken some of the nastier excesses of government over the past 10 years. That’s why parliament wants to destroy them, then the only thing between them and total autonomy is the Queen… which I don’t think is a good thing… no matter what side is in power.

            • Jane St.Clair says:

              Far be it for me to stereotype, but as a fun fact I’ll add that everyone I’ve ever met named Beth has been a couple rocks short of an avalanche.

    • Nixer says:

      They are too ineffective to be dummies. And therein is why I like them more. If they aren’t doing or changing anything, at least they are leaving me the hell alone! The other side LOVES screwing my entire world up.

      It’s like when a cat spends lots of time grooming then you come along and pet it. You know that dirty look they shoot at you before they start grooming all over again? That’s how I feel every time a Right-Winger gets a policy passed.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      This is my ‘bored of right wing retards’ ‘face

      (_!_) Feel free to kiss it… with tongues.

    • George says:

      Are you actually upset that, rhetorically, Obama is labeled “president” prior to the actual ceremony? Seriously? Because if you are, that’s pretty goddamn hilariously pathetic. And I could use a good laugh.

  19. Unknown says:

    ø˙ µ¥ ©øß˙≤ π´øπ¬´¡¡ ©´† ˆ† †ø©´†˙´®¡  ˆ† ˆß ´åߥ †ø ßø¬√´¡

    • Jam Jar says:

      ∑´ ©´† ˆ†≤ ¥ø¨ ç嘠†å¬˚ †˙´ ˜´∑ †å¬˚¡  ˆ† ˆÍ ´åߥ †ø ßø¬√´¡

  20. Nixer says:

    There are now this many people in government that are competent (new caption)

  21. She says:

    *Yawn* What a boring lol.

    Heh…there are way better captions in this thread than the one in the picture.

  22. rock says:

    Looks like he’s saying: “Hmmm, I know I HAD some thoughts at one time, what where they?”

  23. bogie says:

    Sure looks like he’s thinking 143 days worth of deep thoughts… Or did the teleprompter tell him to “look serious and pensive?”

  24. DD says:

    Caption should read – Americans = Smugness we has it, even though we elected Bush twice !

    • AC says:

      OOOOhhhhhh………..
      Can’t wait for the responses to this one…….

      • Uncle Fester says:

        *tumble weed rolls past*

        • OhMyGoodness says:

          Hey, Unc – I’m not big on insects; you may be able to help. Are crickets found in the same places as tumbleweeds, or do crickets require more moisture?

          • viking gal says:

            I think Mormon crickets would be appropriate?

            • OhMyGoodness says:

              *Has a truly appaling mental picture of Mormons attempting to play cricket*

              • *has a truely appaling mental picture of crickets marrying multiple underage crickets and wearing that weird morman underwhere*

                • Jane St.Clair says:

                  Damn. Pay no attention to that link. It belonged with the angst discussion.

                  • rhorho says:

                    What’s underwhere, Jane?

                    • froofrou says:

                      Semper ubi, sub ubi baby.

                      • Scum says:

                        Never I tells ya!!!

                        TMI, right?

                        • rhorho says:

                          America’s The Land of the Free, so NP.

                          *whispers*
                          Just watch it around froo. She’s with the
                          GOP, and they hates free expresshunz!

                        • froofrou says:

                          Well we do have that sheet with the hole in it…….

                        • Scum says:

                          Your KKK robes?

                          (Sorry, just too easy, especially since rhorho mentioned that you’re a GOP stobber)

                          ;-)

                        • froofrou says:

                          Dude, we totally don’t use sheets anymore for that! We have custom-fitted Egyptian cotton robes! I mean, please! Sheets??? That’s so…..so……RETRO!

                        • rhorho says:

                          Okay, froo-Hilde, get that garb off of you.

                          *grabs at froo-Hilde’s ridiculous get-up*

                          Hey! This was my sheet set–1000 thread
                          count!

                          *collapses into nearby chair*

                          Oh, the humanity! Those ebil GOP stobbers
                          stob at nothing!!

                    • OhMyGoodness says:

                      It’s when you have no idea where your small ended up after that huuuge party (which may be really interesting in a Mormon cricket party).

                      • OhMyGoodness says:

                        Umm.. should read *smalls*
                        Brain not right – was about to lay down for a nap when wee Maggie woke up screaming. She’s taken her nappy off, managed to poo ON her nappy, rolled over… and indulged in some Jackson Pollock.
                        *Watches sadly as his nap walks away, whistling*

                        • viking gal says:

                          Bummer!

                        • froofrou says:

                          Yours takes hers off, mine just poos through them. I don’t know how many onsies I’ve had to throw away or bleach within an inch of their lives because she has managed to poo OUT THE FRONT of her diaper. There is no poo in the back. think my kid is set up wrong.

                        • OhMyGoodness says:

                          Oh, very much. Very very much.

                        • OhMyGoodness says:

                          Sorry – the “very much” was to VG – you must have beaten me in by a second or so. Onsies? Forward-poo is no fun at all – probably only beaten by pool-poo. It’s not a plumbing problem, it’s just that they often sit down and kinda rock back… umph.
                          Now I’ve got to see if the washing machine did its job right.
                          *male scared of confessing ignorance about getting poo out of sheets*

                        • froofrou says:

                          Onesie, I guess is a better spelling. The little outfit that opens from the bottom for easy access of the diaper.
                          -
                          Believe it or not, baby wipes are EXCELLENT for getting out poo stains before you put the outfit in the wash. Do you have an Aussie equivalent of Greased Lightning? Because that’s the shizznit for getting out stains in baby-wear.
                          -
                          I have no idea how mine poos out the front. She can’t sit up on her own yet. I’m thinking it may be while she sleeps. She wiggles around a lot on her tummy in her sleep, and that’s when it usually happens.

                        • OhMyGoodness says:

                          Oh, cool – I did the right thing then! Baby wipes – dad’s best friend. Also good for getting ink and grease off hands, and for getting dirt off white leather joggers.
                          I don’t know Greased Lightning, but there are probably similar things that Mrs Goodness uses – as much as I detest the idea of males who leave it all to the women, I don’t exactly have a doctorate in the home sciences. She’s having a weekend away With The Girls – high tea, exotic cocktails etcetera – and I’m having a one-on-one with Maggie. I didn’t want to confess abject failure so early!

                        • rhorho says:

                          Go ahead–Do it! She’ll feel needed, and
                          it’s pretty derned cute, besides.

                        • OhMyGoodness says:

                          Right now, with three kids, a full-time-studying husband, packing-up & moving-house… she’s going to shoot the next thing that makes her feel needed right in the head. No X-ring crap – double-tap ‘atween th’eyes (and she HATES guns!).
                          I suspect she gets the giggles with my attempts at creativity, but she reckons I’m the most inefficient house-worker she’s ever seen.
                          *Sigh* We try. Ooh Lord, we try…

                        • rhorho says:

                          Okay, but she may appreciate a question in
                          the spirit of “a stitch in time saves nine”
                          rather than returning to a toxic waste dump
                          full of stained laundry and exhausted man of
                          the now-soiled cloth. But don’t listen to rho…

                        • OhMyGoodness says:

                          As ever, your wisdom surpasseth… I’m still curled up about the new-soiled cloth. It’s not a bad one at all.

                    • Jane St.Clair says:

                      Yeeeeeaaaaaahhhhh… I knew that looked wrong right as I was hitting the post comment button. I meant to correct it when I took the link out but forgot. I would say I fail but it spawned a fun discussion, so kudos to me?

          • Uncle Fester says:

            I’d go for cicada…

  25. kr0w says:

    Hrm..not reading through all those comments, so if anyone else said it already, I apologize.

    He’s not our president yet. Granted unless some miracle happens, he will be in 5 days. Yet still not our president at the time of caption or post.

    • Yes, the obvious was already obvious before you pointed it out. However, president looks better than president elect on a lol and it is less than a week from being true anyway.

  26. Abeotch says:

    Or…he’s hiding a zit!

  27. Ignatz says:

    No doubt he’s wondering if the White House kitchen staff can make shave ice and moko loko.

  28. Robert says:

    Mostly “Sweet holy God, I’m in over my head…”

  29. Daave3 says:

    not the best photo to use to express intelligence IMO.

    he kinda looks a bit dumb here

    • BDRM says:

      He IS a bit dumb- and thinks America is too.

      • Scum says:

        Well of course he is, but aren’t we all when compared to you?

      • slan agat says:

        Well, that’s nice. For comparison, what was your class rank at Harvard Law?

        • Anti Fester says:

          And what was Obama’s? Oh, thats right- neither he nor Harvard will release his school records. And he got in via the Affirmative action plan.

          • Scum says:

            I’m beginning to think you’re the real Uncle Fester, just showing his nasty side

            Who’s next, Nephew Pustulous Zit?

            • froofrou says:

              Um……have you MET Unc? He’s nasty all the time. And he certainly doesn’t need a sock in order to say what he thinks.

              • Scum says:

                I haven’t met him in person no, but he did provide us with his picture over in the Technology News Thread [Link]

                I just think that the Fester we see up here isn’t really his nasty side. I think it’s his normal, day-to-day persona and perhaps Anti is Hyde to Uncles’ Jekyll.

                • froofrou says:

                  You haven’t been here long enough to ‘know’ Fester. He has no problem being nasty about anything that he feels warrants the nasty. He also NEVER socks. He doesn’t need to. The Uncle Fester you see IS his mask that shields him from revealing his actual persona, which is a little more squishy and huggy than he’d prefer be known.
                  -
                  In other words, Anti IS NOT Fester. It’s a common stalker-troll that thinks its being cute by post-stalking a regular and trying to refute him. The blatant political sides are what give it away. Fester is neither right nor left, but holds a healthy dislike and disdain for the idiots on both sides. He is stunningly apolitical, and an equal opportunity lampooner. I suggest you do a little more reading before you try to saddle someone with a non-deserved slight.

                  • Scum says:

                    Calm down a tad. It’s called feeding the fire. :evil:

                    …but holds a healthy dislike and disdain for the idiots on both sides.

                    My only issue with this statement is that it’s becoming increasingly clear that Fester thinks everyone other than himself falls into that category. He’s free to feel that way, as free as others are to point it out.

                    • rhorho says:

                      Observe for a while longer, and you’ll see what we
                      mean. True, Unc doesn’t pull punches in disagree-
                      ments. When you’re not on the other side with Unc
                      you’ll start to notice his consistency. Froo and I,
                      among others, have learned quite a bit from him.
                      I daresay that you will learn more from Unc than
                      95% of the rest of us, self included.

                      A cool bath will help with some of that butt burn:
                      Trust me on that one.

                      • Scum says:

                        Yes, the consistency is that he thinks he’s smarter than everyone else and therefore, feels justified in basically calling anyone who doesn’t bow to his genius an idiot. I’ve been reading quite a bit up here and have seen it time and time again both toward those who may ‘deserve’ it, and those who don’t.

                        No one actually thinks that Anti and Uncle are the same person. I am beginning to think that neither you nor FrooFrou have a sense of humor though. Pity.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Breathe. Relax.

                          I’ve been on PK a smidgen longer than you.
                          For that reason, I feel confident in advising
                          you that a little Vaseline will help you get
                          that stick out.

                          You’re the one who has lost your sense of
                          humor about this situation. Look at who’s
                          being angry, and look who’s not, okay?

                          You’re having a few growing pains, and
                          that’s all. You’ll feel better soon, promise.

                        • Scum says:

                          Well, when you don’t get it, you just don’t get it.

                          Maybe I need to telegraph the jokes better ’cause it’s obvious there’s a communications breakdown here.

                          I fear that there is nothing I could say now to allow you to understand, since you’ve apparently already made up your minds that I’m somehow nursing an anal wound which just isn’t there. You think I’ve lost my sense of humor? Which jokes of yours in this thread did I miss? Please, point me to them and I’ll reassess. If you didn’t make any, then how do you figure that it was I who lost his sense of humor?

                          Vaseline? Not a good idea (there are also a few good jokes in there, but I’m batting 0 at this point, so I’m not going to bother).

                          As I said before, calm down a tad. If one needs to explain the jokes, they obviously failed. Consider this dropped from my end.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Okay, so you’re not hurt, and we didn’t get
                          that you were just feeding a troll.

                          We stepped in on your fun, took you
                          seriously, and what you said about Unc was
                          a tie in, having something mysterious to do
                          with the initial troll feeding that we missed
                          because we’re dull.

                          Gotcha.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Consider this dropped from my end.

                          LOL–Done!

                        • Scum says:

                          @rhorho
                          Perfect. I couldn’t have said it better myself, and the gods
                          know I tried! :oops:

                          Thank you for finding the words I couldn’t.

                        • rhorho says:

                          SUCKER!! :twisted:

                        • froofrou says:

                          *pops popcorn*
                          *sits back and watches Scum roast*

                  • Scum says:

                    but I am beginning to think that someone has a secret crush on Uncle Fester… ;-)

                • rhorho says:

                  What froo said, plus the syntax is wrong, the opinion is
                  wrong, and the education level is wrong.

                  Further, Unc sent me a more recent photo. [LINK]

            • rhorho says:

              Froo’s right. This is just a common troll.

  30. Mookie says:

    ” Do I put a DJ in the White House or Air Force One- or both? Fo Shizzle!”

    • Uncle Fester says:

      You have a lot of black friends… I can tell…

      [link]

      • Holy crap, did you see the letters on there from people who thought they were serious? Funny as hell, though.

      • rhorho says:

        Funniest thing I’ve seen in a while. I’ve emailed a link to my trainer already.
        He’s going to love it!

        • BDRM says:

          Good to know you have a trainer ! Have they got you housetrained yet? Still biting people? Got the muzzle on ? BWAAHAHAHAHA!

          • rhorho says:

            Jealousy rears its ugly head…or is that its rear…?

            • OhMyGoodness says:

              Rho – I think between the two of us we might just be able fo fart this little bastard into oblivion? My all-Indian diet this week, your aspara-gust, one match…

              • rhorho says:

                That’s overkill, don’t you think? A simple thumb-forefinger
                flick is all we need here.

                But save that curry-powah: The night/day is young! ;-)

          • Seth says:

            You ride the short bus to school, don’t you?

            • Scum says:

              Except in his case the short bus is just a Big Wheel that his mom pushes from the bedroom to the kitchen where he’s home-schooled, while mom works her day job answering questions like:
              What are you wearing?

              • froofrou says:

                must……..*twitch*……not…….*twitch*………reply to…….*twitch*………part of………..*twitch*………this post…………..AAAAAAAGH!!!!!
                -
                DAMMIT I HATE MISCONCEPTIONS!!!!! ARGH!

                • rhorho says:

                  Okay, froo: I’ll say it!

                  NOT ALL forms of homeschooling are bad.

                  There. Happy?

                • scum says:

                  Interesting ‘constraint’ mechanism *twitch*

                  No, not all home-schooling is bad, ok? Feel better?

                  However, when CA passed a law stating that a parent who wishes to home-school their kiddies must first show that they’re, hmm, what’s that word, QUALIFIED!!
                  Right-wingers went nutso.

                  Ok, let’s try this. I have no children and I will not be fathering any children, ever. I help to pay for schools and other services for children. Part of this bothers me, but another part of me realizes that in the proper education of those children, I am helping to ensure a brighter future for my community (however I choose to define it).

                  It’s the same thing when it comes to those of us who are concerned about the quailty of ‘edumacation’ that these chidren are getting at home. Does that make sense?

                  See and I did all of that without once insulting religion!

                  • froofrou says:

                    Anyone who wants to homeschool their kids needs to either be given a competency exam, be a teacher already, or submit their children for standardized testing once every (whatever). I’ll even settle for two out of three. The point is that homeschooling is another one of those areas that is misrepresented, and given the whackos as examples whenever it is invoked. How would you like me to use Michael Moore as a shining example of liberalism at work every time it’s mentioned??

                    • scum says:

                      Yours is not the typical response. Homeschooling is heavily weighted to the side of no regulation, and from what I’ve seen, most home-schoolers prefer it that way as they are very anti-government.

                      If Michael Moore (who is also heavily weighted) were a fair representative of liberals, it would be fair to bring him up as an example, but of course not as proof of how every liberal thinks.

                      I made a joke, which you took very personally. I never said, nor meant all home-schooling, however, I stand by my assemsment that many if not most home-schooling environments are under qualified.

                      • froofrou says:

                        I didn’t take it personally, don’t misunderstand a comic response for soemthing serious :-) I have a vested interest in making sure that homeschooling as a whole is properly represented, that’s all.

                        • Scum says:

                          Ok, cool (even though you tried to eradicate me).

                          I have a lot of issues with home-schooling, only one of which is the qualifications of the teachers, but we can leave the rest of them until they come up ‘organically’…

                        • Froo, one of my daughters homeschooled her senior year, one has homeschooled since, oh, halfway through 10th grade (she’s now a senior), and my youngest did 8th grade homeschooled due to extreme dissatisfaction with our middle school and is now happily back in 9th at our local high school. I think a lot of it depends on the kid and the parent; in other words, you’re going to get out o it what you put into it. Same goes for regular school, of course, just there’s more objective oversight on what the kid’s actually getting out of it. I’m fortunate enough to have bright & self-motivated kids; it’s pretty much a matter of “give them the tools & they’ll soak it up like a sponge”; I’m lucky.

                          Tell you one thing, I’ve been quite happy to get through two senior years without all the overpriced social crap that they aren’t particularly interested in. (One went to a prom at someone else’s school & had an ok time, the other just really isn’t “into” all that).

                        • Mike says:

                          Then why do home schooled kids score consistently higher on SAT’s than public(government run) schools do? Sounds like someones trying to protect their government job.

                        • rhorho says:

                          I haven’t had any luck finding an unbiased
                          source for your information. Perhaps you
                          could say that, of the youngsters *taking*
                          the SAT, the self-reported home-schooled
                          ones tend to fare better. There are many
                          examples of incompetent parents (many of
                          whom did not complete high school) using
                          the unregulated home school status to keep
                          their children away from life outside of their
                          immediate family surrounds.

                          I’m not denying that there are success
                          stories related to home schooling, but, to my
                          knowledge, no representative sample has
                          been studied and the difference between
                          duration of homeschooling has not been
                          explored. I’ve found nothing unbiased about
                          socialization impacts, either.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          IF they were anything other than Chrisitan, people would be howling ‘Cult!’ and sticking the kids in the foster system

                        • Homeschooling’s not always about religion, Unc. Sometimes
                          it’s a matter of “our local public high school is a) not challenging enough or b) downright scary” or, hell, both. Homeschooling is cheaper than private schol, so for some people it seems like the best option.

                          My daughter that’s in college right now had high school classes where you couldn’t learn much due to the behavior of the other students, and these were the honors level classes. Kids would do stuff like sit in the back of class and not whisper or pass notes, but carry on full normal voice conversations, or sing. It was pretty bad and many of her teachers seemed without a clue as to discipline.

                        • Scum says:

                          Thanks rhorho, very well put.

                          @Mike, if you’re referring to me, I’ve never done any kind of work directly for any government office or agency. I’ve been a mentor, but never a paid teacher. I have no direct immediate personal stake in whether or not someone home schools or the quality of education they receive there.

                          (Warning froofrou, if you read further, your head may explode).

                          Most of the people I see for home schooling are radical right-wing fanatics who want to ‘protect’ their children from the evils of gays, blacks, hispanics, thought, reason, science – you know, all of those non-christian values. They want to teach their children to be as ignorant and xenophobic as they are. They want to perpetuate the beliefs in the mythologies which they’ve spent a lifetime using to justify their hate and ignorance. Isn’t it interesting how everyone’s chosen ‘god’ hates all of the same things they do…

                          My stake in this, if you will, is to try to ensure the long-term survival of this country as one of the better places for all to live, and to not allow it to descend further into the religious ‘dark ages’ that the mythologists would love to see happen.

                        • froofrou says:

                          Some of them ARE in cults, Christian or otherwise. And many of them are removed from said parents, or at least made to go to public or private school when their lack of knowledge is revealed.
                          -
                          I’m far too invested emotionally in this topic to be unbiased when talking about it, so I’ll let it go.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          TBH, I’d have loved to have been home schooled… I loathed the other kids, and the place was something between a holding pen for prison and a baby farm. The fact I’ve turned out able to turn a sentence was down to one or two decent teachers (luck of the draw) and my parents…

                          If you want someone to blame… blame them. I do.

                        • rhorho says:

                          My area is rich with resources for home
                          schoolers. Responsible home-schooling
                          parents can network to co-op tutelage, field
                          trips, materials, etc., with remarkable results
                          in both socialization and academic
                          achievement.

                          On the downside, the three most famous
                          murdering moms in recent Texas history
                          were home schoolers.

                          I agree with froo that testing is needed to
                          ensure that home-schooled children are being
                          taught academics, at the least.

                        • @scum: Just to play devil’s advocate here, you could argue that having the kids from ignorant and xenophobic families OUT out of the public schools makes the schools a marginally better place for the rest of the kids. Also, while I’ll certainly admit that homeschooling does seem to get you targeted by
                          groups organized by “that kind” of homeschooler, that most
                          of the homeschoolers I am personally acquainted with are somewhere to the left of Michael Moore. As a somewhat centrist Independent NutJob, they make me look like a far-rightie. Which, I am definitely not, at least not on social issues.
                          The ones you are talking about are out there, for sure, but I think they just tend to be more vocal/visible than the non-nutty homeschoolers.

                        • froofrou says:

                          I’ve now got this vision of Fester as a young lad, looking as he does now only with a tiny body and a giant Fester-head, sitting in a corner and playing with his toys by himself. Every once in a while you’ll hear him call someone a festering bag of pus and mutter about his @ss-grapes, all while sounding like a tiny little Malcolm McDowell and just oozing with hatred for his fellow man.
                          -
                          Now I can’t get that image out of my head.

                        • Scum says:

                          Love it!
                          :twisted:

                        • Scum says:

                          Sorry, the above ‘Love it’ :twisted:
                          was @ FrooFrou

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          You attended my school? Do you have a oval bald patch… if so, it means we had a fight in ‘The Cage’…

                          (And yes, my school DID have a place called ‘The Cage’ and since it was the farthest ‘playground’ from the staff room, was the arena of ‘choice’. It was also neigh impossible to leave unless you were prepared to go through the larger members of the baying mob… rather like they’re thick organic fog that bleeds…)

                        • Hmm….considering that the main reason my daughter that’s
                          now a senior wanted to homeschool is that she was “Sick
                          and tired of spending her days packed like a sardine into a cesspool of babbling idiots”….oh, crap, have I raised a tiny, female, American Uncle Fester? :twisted: She’s really quite nice aside from only liking maybe 10 people.

                        • froofrou says:

                          I believe you pre-date me by quite a bit, Fester dear. :-)

                        • rhorho says:

                          Froo’s mother was the one with the oval bald
                          patch, iirc…

                          :razz:

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          I suddenly realised… I’m wearing underwear older than Frou

                          Sorry about that

                          *sniff*

                          no, still lemony fresh… they’ll do for another month…

                        • Scum says:

                          @ dissimilitude

                          Yes, one could argue that removing those kids could make it better on those left behind (sorry, couldn’t resist). One could also argue that by leaving them in class not only will they benefit from being exposed to reality outside of their parents fantasy world, but the other kids will quickly learn that not everyone thinks the same way, or believes the same things.

                          Rhorho covered one of the big concerns when she said “socialization and academic
                          achievement”. My biggest concerns are lack of social skills (not that attending a public school guarantees any of those either), and valid, academic training. When I was in school, my class sizes were in the 30-40 range, far higher than is deemed acceptable today, yet in spite of a few bad eggs (I was actually one of those), we all learned quite well.

                          Yes, as always, I think the troublemakers are simply the vocal crybaby right-wingers. I’m not 100% against homeschooling, but I am vehemently against uncontrolled, unregulated schooling, in the home or elsewhere.

                        • @scum: Actually, I think we agree…I do think there needs to be more oversight (in general) over homeschooling; at the very least, have the homeschoolers turn up to take the annual achievement tests.

                        • AC says:

                          I don’t know anyone who is homeschooled. Kids with those sort of parents (if they were rich enough and had no scruples about involving themselves with capitalists) went to private schools….

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          Engalnd and Wales have a very different system to the US.
                          The Scots system is similar to the E&W one but is radically differently funded and has some significant differences in curricular emphasis (or did)

                          and what’s wrong with capitalists? Word to the wise… the great socialist experiment failed in the 1970s. It may still cling on with atavism like The Socialist Worker’s Party, but it’s a spent force. As laissez faire capitilaism is noy beging to be see for the Emperor’s new clothes it is, socialist ‘credibility’ was mostly loudly ill educated people who wanted to keep every one as drastically ill educated as them. One thing about Capitalists, they value education, and will pay for the best of it.

                        • froofrou says:

                          My big thing with homeschooling is that it allows parents who don’t have the money for private schooling, but still want to remove their children from the sometimes damaging influence of peer groups that are more and more driving each other into depression, suicide, and other more damaging exploits, to be able to do so without bankrupting themselves. I don’t think that it should be regulated to the point that the government tells you exactly what you have to do, when you have to do it, and the like (I’m far too conservative to ever agree with that), but the kids at the very least should be held to the same testing standards as everyone else.
                          -
                          In my case, I scored off the charts on every test I ever took, including the ACT. If my math scores hadn’t been so low (I have a severe mental block when it comes to math), I would have gotten 98th percentile or above in every section. The socialization wasn’t an issue, because my parents made sure that we had peers to play with, both in and out of homeschooling venues. We were also socialized around adults, and could carry on conversations with people three times our ages and hold our own. We were the exception rather than the rule, however, the ability to homeschool should not be taken away from the masses simply because of a few nuts who make it look bad.
                          -
                          Sorry, didn’t mean to go all troll b on you. Like I said, I’m emotionally invested in this.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          We were the exception rather than the rule, however, the ability to homeschool should not be taken away from the masses simply because of a few nuts who make it look bad.

                          So, you’re saying that, for the most part, the overall
                          standard isn’t that good, but it’s a minority that make it so?

                          you really did flunk applied maths (stats) didn’t you…

                        • froofrou says:

                          I’m saying that for the most part, homeschoolers aren’t schooled any less than an average public schooler. What makes us all look bad are the nuts who dress their kids alike and make all of the own clothes at home. My sister and I were the above-average examples.
                          -
                          As far as applied maths, I loved statistics, but lock up when I see algebra, trig, or any other advanced math. It’s a personal thing, and has nothing to do with my schooling. On the ACT I scored a 65% in math, which was enough to pass. Everything else was 98% and above.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          :) I wanted clarification… I got it :)

                          And I’m all for Home schooling… but I’m not for the idea of it being a free for all in terms of content and quality…

                        • AC says:

                          @ UF (in EngALnd? You been drinking on a Sunday?) : what’s wrong with capitalism? The clue is in the name: capital. Money’s the answer to everything isn’t it? If you have money you deserve to have a “better” education. I don’t see how anyone with a sense of social justice could fail to be disgusted by this.
                          -
                          It is Scotland’s decidedly anti-capitalist government that means that there are no uni tuition fees in our country. Normal people now find it
                          much easier to get their qualifications.
                          -
                          Also, smart people are perfectly able to get a decent education from normal schools. Private schools just give rich stupid kids more tutoring and kill the scottish accents of the rest. Private schooling is just a way of “bettering” oneself class-wise. It is an atavistic anomaly left over from Victorian Britain.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          To get my University Education, my dad, Craftsman Welder, worked all hours god sent and few hours that were invented by the Axis in WW2 to break the Allies spirit to make sure I got what I needed. He did the same fo rmy brother.

                          The father of the only Turkish painter exhibited in the Guggenheim, NYC was a fruit packer. He worked 4 jobs to ensure his son got the support and trianing he needed (the support was hard since the guy was born blind, and no, I’m not making that up [link])

                          The socialist idea that folk can’t afford it is not wholly true…
                          a lot of people’s family just don’t support them. Wailing “I can’t afford it”, while smoking and drinking it away really donesn’t cut it for me… I saw a lot of families like that. Whelped too many times and both parents happily bovine with their fags and booze… There are genuine cases… a few form my hell hole comprehensive have put themselves through Uni as mature students…

                          Having said that, if you can get the grades, there should be funded places.

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          A fine and balanced reason for disliking the idea… I’m not in the mood for arguing working class cred with a foetus…

                          My dad worked to get both my brother and I through university… but it was a cushy being a craftsman welder… hanging in cooling blast furnaces making repairs at 3 in the morning… He didn’t smoke, nor did he drink… and put his family first. Rare bird…

                        • AC says:

                          Sorry, I really don’t know what you’re getting at…
                          Foetus? What?
                          Working class cred?
                          I’m presuming you were addressing me but I don’t know why you brought up the aforementioned. Nesting fail? Please clarify.

              • rhorho says:

                I think that’s his dad…

  31. BDRM says:

    Oooo! Oooo! If I “forget” to pay $34,000 in income tax, can I be in charge of the IRS too!!!

    • Uncle Fester says:

      No, but you can be Joe the Plumber

      *Nelson Muntz*

      ah-HAAAAA!

      */Nelson Muntz*

      or you can try to establish mens rea on the non payment…

      • BDRM says:

        I am so proud that all my taxes this year probably did not even pay for 1/40,000 of the cost of the Inaugural Ball. Gee- I wonder what else we could have spent that money on? Body armor for soldiers, free vaccinations for underpriviledged kids, getting people out of FEMA trailers…..Yep- you liberals sure know how to “Spread the wealth around”!!!!

        • rhorho says:

          How much did you pay in taxes off your paper route, Skippy?

          • Mike says:

            I paid 40,000 -this quarter alone. Suck on that, Liberal.

            • Uncle Fester says:

              You’ve been tweaking again, haven’t you mike…

            • rhorho says:

              @Mike/Jam Jar/Beth/et al:

              Looks like you’re doing a great job of sucking by yourself.

              • Mike says:

                Rhorho, Seth, N8,HHNF, etc….
                If no one paid income tax in this country for one year, the loss would be One Trillion dollars- exactly the same cost as Obama’s Economic Stimulation plan. Think about that. Who’s better to decide how to spend your money- the government or you? It also means that to pay for this plan of his, taxes would have to DOUBLE on everyone in this country who works. You think businesses are outsourcing overseas now? Just wait and see. Personally, I’d rather keep my own money, pay off bills , etc than double my taxes so BHO can give my money away to his friends.

                • viking gal says:

                  Sure, fine, if you are lucky enough to have gotten a good education, landed a job that pays well (unlike say daycare or nurse’s aide or sales clerk or administrative assistant), and not gotten a debilitating illness which causes you to lose that job, or become permanently disabled due to a car accident caused by an uninsured driver…
                  The fact that you paid 40K in quarterly taxes means that even if you are self-employed, you have a serious income. So pull up your big-boy shorts (or tighty whities, I won’t judge), and pay your part to support society.
                  Consider enlightened self-interest, since you are so tied into your own ‘needs’. As FDR figured out, if the government does not providing opportunities in times of severe economic crisis (ie. massive unemployment and loss of savings) the result will most likely be riots and revolution. When people can’t feed their families, and have nothing to lose, they will take it out on everyone…including those who ‘have’.

                  • Mike says:

                    Pay my part to support society?
                    We’ve only had income taxes since WW2- how the heck did our government “support society” for all the years before that? Support who ?illegal immigrants, welfare queens, CEO’s receiving $50,000,000 severance packages after getting bailed out with my tax money? My lazy ass sister who lives on welfare because she’s too lazy to work and admits it?
                    Yeah, right…”Spread the wealth around”, huh?
                    I wonder how many people would get off their rear ends and get a job if their “benefits” were cut off.
                    Now THAT would stimulate the economy!

                    • Uncle Fester says:

                      Actually, the 16th Amendment was ratified Pre-WW1, although there was a lot of tooing and froing until 1955…

                      and if your family are welfare frauds, don’t blame anyone except your parents… they raise you to be a moron and your sister to be idle and dishonest… I’d say ‘deal’ Just because you and yours are degenerate, freeloading , doesn’t mean everyone else is…

                      Retard.

                    • FaileV says:

                      We had a large class gap, those not born into, or lucky enough to gain wealth generally married early and had very large families as a form of social security, we had a much lower life expectancy, and to get extra income by sending the kids to work in factories.
                      the government has helped many people to live as opposed to simply survive.

                      • Uncle Fester says:

                        the government has helped many people to live as opposed to simply survive.

                        Filthy commies! Part of the American dream is crushing poverty and the freedom to starve in the street…

        • Uncle Fester says:

          You mean like the Republicans did for Bush in 2001 and 2004? That sort of party? Balloons and cake were least excesses of those little, intimate, ‘cheap’, soirées…

          You really are desperate… and pointless…

  32. Dylan says:

    Obama Sucks, he’s not our president even! Not until the inauguration!

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Well, thank you for clarifying that… I’m sure a lot here were confused…

      Do you attend a day centre or are you cared for at home?

      • rhorho says:

        Hey, leave my kid brother out of this. He’s only 18 months old, and rather
        smart for his age. He’s not happy with Obama, but he really enjoys playing
        with his toes. He also likes to play with his …uh, we just don’t leave him out
        of a diaper too long, let’s just say…

      • BDRM says:

        This childish insult brought to you by the ObamaTron Network ” Just relax ! You don’t have to think anymore! We’ll do it for you!” and the letters I, D and T.
        Now back to our regularly scheduled conservative bashing..
        Back to you, Fester!

        • froofrou says:

          Well, in all honesty, as badly as I hate defending Fester (ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch ouch), he’s an equal opportunity basher, and doesn’t just bash conservatives. He pretty much bashes anyone he feels needs bashing, and some who don’t. And, he enjoys pushing old ladies down stairs, taking candy from babies, and kicking puppies.

          • Uncle Fester says:

            Thanks for the glowing character assessment, Frou. It’s all true, although you missed my love of infecting kittens with anthrax to watch their skin fall off…

            • rhorho says:

              That one of your hobbies is best for one to witness first-hand.
              Descriptions pale by comparison, and some of your mystique is
              lost in the tip-off.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Mystique? I’m as open and sunny as the day is long

                (Unit: ‘day’ – the length of daylight from sunrise to sunset, measured in late November, 75 miles north of Murmansk, in medium haze)

        • Uncle Fester says:

          BDRM,

          If you think I have any love for the jug eared Akhenaten lookalike that got elected in November (link behind name), then you really should consider stopping huffing lighter fluid, or, since you seem to be a Republican, sticking oxycotin pessaries up your arse… it’s damaging your critical faculties. How anyone of discernment or taste can presume to defend the sort of troglodyte ravings of
          ‘he sux s0 bAd’ style posters quite makes me despair for the future of our stunted, venal, unpleasant little species…

  33. John M. says:

    President ELECT

  34. Sarah says:

    I don’t understand how almost none of these comments are even remotely about the picture. It’s so rediculous.

    • viking gal says:

      No, it is pundit kitchen. Read for a while, and maybe you’ll start to get it…or maybe not.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      and, perhaps in some far off time when I’m being abused in a ‘care home’, between violent outbursts and forced injections of anti-psychotics, and you’re a lot older, you may have learned that, even in Doctor Webster’s illegitimate version of English they use in you demon haunted chunk of the third world, the word is ‘ridiculous’. It’s an ‘I’ you muppet, not an ‘E’…

      If feel so purged now…

  35. lovely.SJ says:

    THOUGHTS
    he don’t has em
    but he pretends pretty good though

  36. B-HO says:

    ” Hmmm…What name can I come up with for my new Communist Youth Police…something pleasant…How about “Organizing for America? “That sounds innocent enough. We’ll do to anyone who speaks out against me the same as we did to Joe the Plumber and destroy them.We’ll start by ending all home schooling and enrolling the children in my indoctrination centers- public school.
    We cannot tolerate dissent at all- I’ll have to ask my buds Putin and Chavez how to manage that….Hmmmm…”

    • B-HO says:

      ” And I must reward my loyal protectors well….Perhaps a cabinet Post for Uncle Fester and Seth ?…”

    • Uncle Fester says:

      I think the Patriot Act and Presidential Veto sorted all that out… as to the rest… well, I look forward to someone prying your AK from your cold dead hand in the news soon…

      So, which one of the usual arsewipes are you with a new name?

    • Ceefax says:

      Look, you tried all this BIG SCARY OBAMA IS GONNA ENSLAVE US AAAAAALLLL HE’S A SOCIALIIIIIISTTT, HE’S A MUUUSLIMMMMM, HE’S THE AAAANTIII CHRIIIIIST during the campaign and it resulted in the Republican Party getting its ass handed to them and having the biggest cry-baby butt-hurt fest the world has ever seen. You’d think you’d have learned your lesson by now, but no.

  37. Ello says:

    let me get this strait. We got from being the first comment to strippers to homeschooling to what im typing! Wow…..

  38. brohammed says:

    failblog worthy


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    dissimilitude on Get of your
    dissimilitude on Let’s imagine the look o…
    Lynx318 on Let’s imagine the look o…
    LarsVonLederhosen on TRAIN ORIGAMI
    bob on Shhhh…be…completel…
    Xenon on Let’s imagine the look o…
    Xenon on Let’s imagine the look o…
    paws4thot on Let’s imagine the look o…
    paws4thot on Get of your
    Default User on Get of your
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz