Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

For what we are about to film…



Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

For what we are about to film-Lord we are truly thankful

Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Dom

» Recaption This

» See All Captions

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

You May Like:

» 266 Comments

  1. Rofl says:

    Epic.Win.

  2. Q says:

    wow. legs. get over it.

  3. Paul says:

    Good lord. Where do I go to support whatever program those women are in? We definitely need to make sure it’s well-funded.

    • PiMan says:

      But if it is well funded, then they might be able to afford pants. Do we really want that?

      • Point taken. We all have to make cutbacks…

        • telefil says:

          Not at all, they spend their pants funds on shoes, so no worries :)

          • Tessie says:

            I’m sick and tired of MY TAX DOLLARS paying for shoes that don’t match!! Lazy hussies… what is the world coming to when women can’t even go shoe shopping properly… hell in a handbasket…
            *grumble*

            • I, for one, haven’t noticed a damn thing about their shoes… : D

              • B. Phil says:

                They wear shoes?

              • forge says:

                I did, as such: What fricking military service makes their troops march arond in fricking high heels? Shouldn’t that be registered as a form of torture?

                • Booshee says:

                  I don’t know if they are military, and if they are, it’s not USA military. Someone mentioned the mis-matched heels before. Plus, while they all have their hair tired back, it’s still down. Both big no-nos in US Military.

                  • SPCOsborne says:

                    Second that.

                    Looking in the background (as little of it as there is)

                    Looking in the background (as little of it as there it seems that it might bbe a european military force. What bugs me is that there seem to be 2 US Army looking “Class A” uniforms in the background, so maybe german or italian? I know we’ve got installations there. Not too sure to be honest though.

                  • Klieu says:

                    … and the skirts are at knee, not at upper thigh. US military outfits for women are rather dowdy.

                    • kitten53325 says:

                      yeah, I have to agree, probably not military. Maybe a pep squad though.
                      though. While the current Army dress uniform *is* grey (arggh! I
                      miss the dress greens!!!), the insignia on the arms looks all wrong, plus the current dress uniforms have knee-length skirts and the heels are much lower.
                      lower. Both of my parents are ex-military and my husband is
                      serving currently, and I’ve never seen a women’s skirt
                      shorter than knee length. It should be noted also that only the
                      formal uniforms have skirts; all other female uniforms are
                      virtually identical to the male ones.

      • Tessie says:

        Also, the pants should be allocated where they’re really needed, i.e., the Polka Dot Underwear Brigade.

  4. i_am_#1 says:

    All right, guys quit drooling or you will damage your computer keyboards :)

  5. Steve says:

    The camera man: “I’m not looking at your legs, I’m not looking at your legs…GOOD LORD THE VIEW SCREEN ON THIS CAMERA IS TERRIFIC!!!”

  6. legion says:

    great way to start the morning :)

  7. Steve says:

    Something about dress uniforms…ladies don’t pretend a man in uniform doesn’t get your attention!

    I really approve of this dress code…the skirts and heels are a nice touch.

    • lowly grunt says:

      I hope for their sake that the parade is a short one. YOWCH!

    • Siava says:

      I’m not going to pretend anything! Men in uniform is hawt.

    • rhorho says:

      The first thing I noticed was their shoes don’t all match. We straight femmes are weird that way, I s’pose…

      • Danbala says:

        It made me flinch a bit too. :o )

        • rhorho says:

          …and the hats are crooked, and the hair isn’t consistent, and their gloved hands are balled up into fists (probably from the tight shoes)…
          There, straight guys: Now you have information it would have taken a week for you to discover on your own. ;-)

          • Danbala says:

            I wonder who they are. Definitely not military. (If they are, they need a spanking.) Is it just the light, or is the colour quite different on the various jackets too? Looks a bit like a “territorial army”-thing which has no budget but haven’t realized that they’re shut down. Didn’t get the memo. :o /

            • Celeste says:

              umm i think its just the lighting that makes the jackets look different
              colors…. but the hats, and shoes bug me too (I think i spend to much
              time with the perfection obsessed cadets at my school)

            • rhorho says:

              I was hoping you would know. They appear to me to be northern European by phenotype (mainly). LOL–I’m sure many guys would line up and march for the chance of a spanking with these women, giving or receiving, as it were. Considering they don’t look battle-ready, I’m thinking this is some sort of morale-boosting secretarial, nursing, or other such military-attached squad. A show of a different kind of force…?

              • Danbala says:

                I am irritatingly clueless here. :o (
                (The more I look at it, the more I am thinking “air stewardesses” or something. Nothing with any military connection should be allowed to be that sloppy.)

                • rhorho says:

                  Agreed. To me, the abundance of long hair and the lack of thick ankles was the deal-clincher, after the sloppiness.

                  • FaileV says:

                    yeah it made me think stewardess too. mostly the hair and the fact there are some looking around. There’s no way in hell any military gig would allow that to happen in a public parade. The shoes too, nice as they are (and i am impressed, I can walk in heels much less march) I don’t think they could do any turning or whatever because you turn on the ball of one foot and heel of the other..
                    Maybe it’s a parade the Airport or something put on

                  • um says:

                    I didn’t have thick ankles in the military. Most female soldiers didn’t. You can have long hair in the military if you’re female, too. You just have to wear it off your collar. I think the standards used to be more lax in the Navy (I saw women in ponytails when I was a Navy brat) but they’re more, eh, “uniform” now.

                    • Navygrl says:

                      Actually, the Navy makes us wear our hair either up or short, and never touching the bottom of our collar. I have seen pictures of the Australian Navy’s females having ponytails while in uniform. Don’t know when the USA ever let females in the Navy wear ponytails in uniform.

                • dropping in says:

                  I was thinking nothing military should have that high of a heel for marching in…cute, but DAMN…also I think there is a limit in US mil for style and hiegth that these violate…

                  • viking gal says:

                    If you want women to march in heels, have them wear dancing shoes, like the
                    capezios that dancers wear on broadway. Heels, but solidly
                    made: stable and designed for comfort.

              • Uncle Fester says:

                Spanking? naa

                But they can clamp their thighs over me ears…

                (Fester’s hint of the day: when muff diving, if you can feel the bones in your skull creak, you know you’re doing it right)

            • Spanking? You have my attention. *grabs flogger and puts on proper scowl*

              • Lenwë Mithrandír says:

                Dude, that’s your leaf blower. Quick, get back to work before the foreman catches you on here again.

                *Insert clumsy “leaf blower” rebuttal here* Just thought I’d save you the time.

                • *lacks a foreman and lacks a leaf blower*

                  What are you going on about now?

                • OhMyGoodness says:

                  Yewhut? Get out of DWN’s way – it could be very educational. Like the ginger tip (which, incidentally, certainly does not work for everyone… there was nearly a fatality! One person’s ginger is another’s wasabe.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Oh My Goodness!!
                    Perhaps you should start with something less, uh…potent?
                    *visions of sugar plums immediately cease, pack up equipment, and move to another head*

                    • OhMyGoodness says:

                      Lordy, I wasn’t recomending wasabe at all… jes’ that m’ poor wife is a little too tender to try the ginger trick. *sighs deeply, takes small breath* Point being, that ridiculous leaf-blowing Gandalf just distracted DWN from a potentially fascinating thought. Mea maxima culpa. If leafblowers are distracting, I guess wasabe’s not nice either.

          • Steve says:

            Hey, I noticed the shoes on the blonde in the second row from the front, nearest the photographer! She has sexy straps on her heels, none of the others do.

            I’m straight AND I notice things!

          • luke says:

            their hands aren’t exactly “balled up”. that’s the way you walk at the position of attention in the military. and their legs are hot, so it doesn’t matter.

          • Forge says:

            Bah, I noticed the shoes the very first second. And I’m not even a fetishist or nothin’. I don’t remember any uniforms having that short of a skirt anywhere in the world either, and I noticed the long hair after someone else mentioned it.

      • Uncle Fester says:

        I like the strappy ones on the blonde second from right

        in fact I like the blonde second right.

    • Danbala says:

      Men in uniform don’t do much for me, no. :o (
      But the uniforms can. If they’re right.

      • rhorho says:

        I think it depends on the uniform, and how it’s worn. A Texas sheriff’s deputy with a big belly, in uniform? Nuh-uh. A buff, dirty fireman who needs a bath and a good meal? I can haz Donkey Kong?

        • Captain Wow says:

          Here in Kentucky our troopers are the epitome of hot. If you get pulled over it’s not hard to try to flirt your way out of a ticket.

          • rhorho says:

            Oh, I’m not saying I’m above getting out of a ticket, and the pot-bellied ones are a lot more susceptible to flirting than the buff ones, imo.

            • Captain Wow says:

              True, but it’s easier for me to flirt with the buff ones. I’m on my a-game with them.
              :-) That probably makes me sound shallow. Oh, well.
              *sighs*

              • rhorho says:

                Well, mark me down in the shallow column. One time, I talked my way out of a speeding ticket by a total hunka-hunka. I was thoroughly disappointed that my warning citation listed his name, but no telephone number. ;-)

                • Captain Wow says:

                  Damn. Hate when that happens. You know, I feel sorry for guys *sometimes*.
                  We females can chat our way out a ticket most of the time, where as if they get a female cop she isn’t going to listen and more than likely slap them with a ticket. A male cop for that matter.

                  • rhorho says:

                    Years ago, when I lived in an apartment complex, a stolen car was parked in my designated parking place. I called the police, and a female cop chewed me up one side and down the other for opening the door before asking who she was. She didn’t shut up until I told her that I had seen her marked car pull up from my window. With less trouble, I could have had the car towed away. No good deed goes unpunished, it would seem.

          • peppercorn says:

            just admit it, you just speed so you can drool at the eyecandy in uniform :)

      • OhMyGoodness says:

        Hate to say it, but they don’t look like men in uniforms to me…

    • mkb says:

      The heels would be a nice touch if they all matched! HAVE A UNIFORM UNIFORM! Some are far more strappy than others!

      • B. Phil says:

        Incidentally, you’d be amazed how much variation we have in footwear in the military. For the Air Force, boots can be black, green, or tan (black or green with the BDUs, green or tan with the ABUs), and the black boots must either be polished or appear polished. With the blue dressier uniforms (like what we’d wear for parades), polished black boots, polished black leather shoes, or even “shineless” plastic dress shoes that you shine by wiping the dust off.

        I wanna say that for the dress shoes, females have their choice of heels, pumps, or low-quarters. Most of the girls I know, when they have to wear their blues, opt for the heels and the skirt, because it looks better (and because they rarely ever have to march in parades)

        That said, yeah, I’m amazed that these women would willingly march in heels, depending on if their route includes any pivot movements.

  8. chris says:

    great googly moogly

    • Captain Wow says:

      is that from the movie evolution?

      • FaileV says:

        it’s from a kids show last i checked something about an imaginary monster

        • Captain Wow says:

          I watched a clip from Evolution, he says great googa booga I think. You can see how I made the mistake?

        • Kuromisa says:

          It was called Maggie and the Ferocious Beast. I don’t watch so much Nick Jr. now that my little sister’s grown up, so I could be wrong, but I think they took that show off the air.

          • Bill C. says:

            I heard “Great Googly Moogly” in a Snickers commercial before Maggie and the Ferocious Beast was ever on, but I don’t think it was new there, either.

            • Stardrake says:

              “Great Googly Moogly!” dates back at least to 1974. It appears on Frank Zappa’s first hit single, “Don’t Eat The Yellow Snow”. (Actually, it appeared on the track “Nanook Rubs It” on the APOSTROPHE (‘) album, but bits from both that cut and “Yellow Snow” were edited down into the single version.)

              Now whether Frank made it up, or just heard it in his neighborhood while growing up, , I got no idea…

              • pcflamingo says:

                Or….”great googa mooga can’t ya hear me talkin’ to ya….just a ball of confusion” from one of the 4 or 5 guy groups of the ’60s. Temptations? Four Tops? Some such.

  9. Kraas says:

    *made speechless by the hotness*

  10. The TX says:

    I think that camera is the Canon XL2.
    Look it up, you’ll see I’m right.

    Oh yeah, and LEGS!!!!!

    • rhorho says:

      Are you from Texas? If so, what area?

      • The TX says:

        Nope, TX is my name, it does not mean ‘Texas’. Please please PLEASE do not let yourself be stereotyped as being a self-centered American by assuming something that just-so-happens to be the same or similar to something American is in fact American. Lookup ‘TX’ on wikipedia – TX means LOTS of different things, the postal abbreviation of Texas is just one of them.

  11. Des says:

    They aren’t wearing their wedges all uniformly . . .

    Speaking as someone who wears a uniform a lot, yes, this bugs me.

  12. Doubts says:

    Who care how they are wearing their uniforms???????!!!!!

    I have been a nuaghty warlord and need my dictatorship overthrown….yummy

  13. Rafiq of the many says:

    I hope they are marching over to join my “unit”.

    I am all for corpral punishment, if these are the ladies dishing out the spankings. :-D

  14. LEILA says:

    What’s with the itty bitty skirts? I don’t get it.

  15. grandgrrl says:

    They look like Rockettes (or similar to me) sporting some silly costume designer’s idea of what “sexy military ladies” wear.

    • Duffy says:

      I don’t even think it’s a dance troupe – they’d all be wearing the same shoes.
      And flight attendants ditto.
      A puzzlement…

  16. caturday says:

    maybe an ROTC group?

  17. Sasamigirl says:

    WIN! It’s the Ukrainian military reserve!
    According to my fiance, Ukraine doesn’t allow women to serve in active duty, so most that want to enlist end up as reservists at desk jobs.

  18. Maksim says:

    Hate to (possibly) disappoint people, but looking at the carpet, and the badges on their uniforms, these women are Belarusian policewomen. Soon they’ll be sitting in offices and sending people around, making people wait, wasting time, feeling powerful at the expense of the poor people they’re supposed to serve.

    Then they might write up arrest warrants for some kids who said Lukashenka should go….

  19. Green Is Good says:

    One of these police officer’s will be chasing a perp in those high heels, and she’ll have to break off pursuit because she got a run in her stocking.

  20. Anon says:

    Looks like Roy Mustang has become Fuhrer…

  21. Danbala says:

    They look quite a lot like these gals. (Click my name for other photos of “uniform-chicks”.)

    • Blatant Coward says:

      Yup think you got a winnah there, the shoulder flashes match real well, and one of the girls in the formation have ankle strapes like one of the ladies on patrol.

      • Danbala says:

        Yeah, there’s a lot that looks the same. The sloppy hair and the non-fitting clothes as well. (They seem to have bought a lot of the “one size fits no-one”.)

  22. um says:

    I know it comes off as “no sense of humor” but although I sympathize with the fact that women drool over guys in uniform (and I do as well, though not as much as most of ya, I lived around that stuff the first 2/3s of my life and it’s old hat), there’s a certain element to women being drooled over that really bothers me. Because women in the service still get treated like the only reason they’re there is to “service” the men. Then you get the civilian yahoos who go HOLY COW LOOKIT THEM LEGS after three or four years of military guys pawin’ at ya and it kind of… no. Creepy. Ew. Google “Maria Lauterbach” to get an idea of what we go through there if we are any degree of “hot” whatsoever, and sometimes even when we’re not. And God help us if we were normal 18, 19, 20 year olds with our own hormones raging. Then we got blamed for anything the guys did. On top of that, the dried old conservative biddies in D.C. (for U.S. military) trying to convince the Pentagon that women don’t belong in the military. WTF. Can we just do our frigging JOBS without troglodytes turning it into a pr0nfest? I think female firefighters and cops would say the same damn thing if you asked them, too. Except maybe the ones who posed in Playboy. Puke.

    • Wow, I sense a lot of bitterness. I do not support any of the policies enacted against women to keep them from doing their jobs and being respected as the sexual beings they may or may not be. Nobody should be blamed for another’s actions if they haven’t done anything.

      However, in light of that, I will state that I will make pr0n out of whatever the hell I damn well please. I have not oppressed, hindered, or even implied anything horrible against women. I rather adore them and find myself in awe of them most of the time. Then again, because of all the pricks who put women in this paranoid situation, I have to be paranoid and overly cautious about what I say or do lest I get screamed at for being some kind of monster.

      Rather frustrating when I haven’t done anything. But again, isn’t a jab just an observation of the effect of what you mentioned.

      As for the women who pose in playboy, be their servicewomen or otherwise, that is their decision. Isn’t disgusting as the body isn’t horrible or evil. It just is. Sexual freedom shouldn’t be shunned. Last thing we need is women being put back into sexual repression in the name of freedom.

      • Danbala says:

        I agree with both of you. Most frustrating. :o P

        • Indeed and it is why Um has my sympathy. Took forever for women to be open about their sexuality. Still haven’t gotten their pay as equal yet. Hell, we just now got our first four star general that is a woman here in the states. Tis craziness I tell you.

          • Danbala says:

            I think the saddening problem is when gender gets in the way of one’s professionalism. Doesn’t happen often to me personally, fortunately, I tend to get mistaken for a man instead, so meh. ;o)
            .
            I can really relate to* the frustration over The Way Things Are, though, and I have met many women who find this most problematic (without being overly bitter).
            .
            So yeah. Anyway. Power to everyone! (Or something like that.)
            .
            *) I hate clichée expresseions like that, but sometimes I find them to be apt. :o /

          • Danbala says:

            Uh. My response became a little detached from your post there along the way. Gender issues tend to make my fingers start typing too fast for their own good. So, yes. I hate when women or men get treated differently becuase of what they happen to have between their legs. Or protruding from the chest area. And that goes for people in all professions, including pr0n and the like.

    • Lenwë Mithrandír says:

      @ um: I’m impressed. Your post was up here for more than half an hour before one of the Pundit Kitchen resident dorks came down to flame you. They don’t like people who form their own opinions here. Prepare for a sh*tstorm and don’t bother to respond to any of them. It’s like any other message board – logic, reason and original thought don’t work with them. Group-think prevails here.

      One other thing. They’re not troglodytes. They’re all Dark Lords of Something or Another or Priestesses Supreme of the Underworld. Be careful. Some really badass dweebs, they are.

      • dissimilitude says:

        Hm. So what you are saying is that any response to her rant other than “Oh, you’re absolutely right!” constitutes flaming? I think we’re all capable (including Um in the “we” here) of having a coherent discussion on a topic where we may agree, disagree, or both (hi, Danbala!).

        Anyway, while I agree that we should all be able to do our jobs without having our asses grabbed if we don’t want ‘em grabbed, I don’t see that making “drooly” remarks over a photograph of a group of what appear to be attractive young women is hurting anyone. I mean, good grief, did you see the comments on the hot shirtless military guys a while back? This is tame in comparison! ;-)

      • Kuromisa says:

        Obvious sock is pitifully obvious.

      • SPCOsborne says:

        “I cast magic missle”
        “What are you casting it at!?!?!”
        “At….THE DARKNESS!”

    • Ugh, having reread my post, I am going to apologize. It came off way more harsh than I intended.

  23. Amy says:

    that ist the proof that russian girls are hot!!!^^

  24. Fruitcup says:

    Oh, they have to wear heels. Far more impractical than anything the men have to wear. Guess it’s more important to sex those women up than take them seriously at their job!

    • Sexiness of the picture aside, you do have a point. I don’t see skirts and heels to be very tactical in whatever job is having them march about. Luckily, if I am to believe the above posts, they have a mostly sit down job. Though that still means they are marching in heels. @_@

      • Fruitcup says:

        There’s nothing wrong with appreciating attractive women, but I don’t think there should be such an emphasis on attractiveness when it has nothing to do with (or may even hinder) their capabilities of doing their job. It would be like making the men wear short shorts or something equally ridiculous and impractical.

    • Blatant Coward says:

      May I point out there is a world of difference between parade/dress uniform and everyday uniform for men too? Dress Greens for army looks nothing like the BDU MARCAM or “Chocolate chips” for combat.

  25. soop says:

    Dats da fack Jack.

  26. Jocasta says:

    There were some great captions on this one.

  27. Sakuso says:

    Oh wow…this seems so humiliating to me. I’m actually ashamed.

  28. froofrou says:

    Dominus Possum Pox Probiscus Postmortum Et Tu Brute Bruella CarberUndum.
    -
    Ten points and my undying respect for the person who can tell me what this is from and why it’s contextually accurate :o )

  29. the pixinator says:

    “What fricking military service makes their troops march arond in fricking high heels?”

    Well, I was wondering this myself, and as I am too lazy to read through all the posts to find out if the answer to that question has been posted, I’ll go with my first guess: Italy.

    Let’s face it, if this is an actual military march (I’m thinking it’s actually some kind of stewardess uprising), then what country that allows women to serve in the military would also require them to dress like this? The answer HAS to be Italy. Only Italian generals would allow one of the recruits to wear sling-back stillettos instead of practical pumps.

    Yes, I am female, and half-Italian, so I like to think I can say that without it’s being considered too snarky. But I’ve never been in the military, and I don’t think I’d want to march in that army at my age. My feet couldn’t take it.

  30. FireNova says:

    Wow! If I can look that hot in uniform-sign me up!

  31. Vuducow says:

    They are Russian. How do I know? I know. I’m Russian.

  32. North Jericho says:

    Movie scene!

  33. Anastasia says:

    Of course, only in Russia this would not be considered a short skirt :) Take a look at Russian Bride websites to see what girls are wearing there :)

  34. D-Day says:

    if i was one of those girls i’d be nervous about where that camera is.

  35. djeison says:

    They are female cops in Russia. They really do dress like that sometimes. This country is so like America in the Hollywood version of the 70’s where feminism is a dirty word, men are expected to cheat on their wives, and uniforms for young women are meant to attract attention

  36. Lee says:

    They look like mercenary flight attendants. If I had to guess a military I’d say Finland, though.


Your Comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    viking gal on Urge to join Army…
    alex on Who is that homeless dude…
    alex on Who is that homeless dude…
    alex on Who is that homeless dude…
    lolwut on Who is that homeless dude…
    Kraas on Who is that homeless dude…
    factory on Who is that homeless dude…
    twot on Who is that homeless dude…
    Jefafa on Who is that homeless dude…
    Ruski on You’re wrong about …
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz