A different kind of MILF:
A different kind of MILF: Moron I’d Like to Forget.
(Ann Coulter)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: violynn
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous If you’re President and you know it… | Why yes, this is EXACTLY what I invented the internet for! Next »
» 562 comments
-
Recent Comments
I want to beat EWAda… on TRAIN ORIGAMI Rattus on WOOPS Danbala on Let’s imagine the look o… Ivan The Patron Sain… on TRAIN ORIGAMI Nucky, the Official … on TRAIN ORIGAMI The Steve on Let’s imagine the look o… The Steve on Let’s imagine the look o… mabsba on TRAIN ORIGAMI Nucky, the Official … on TRAIN ORIGAMI mabsba on WOOPS 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Eww. Just ewww!!
Good caption. I just don’t even want to see her.
Her?!? Take a look at the dude’s neck. See that Adam’s apple? That’s a pretty prominent protuberance for a chick. Not that there’s anything wrong with being a transsexual.
Not to mention that her neck appears to be at least a foot long.
I wonder if she can unhinge her jaw and swallow a person whole?
I believe so; but if you zig and zag, you can outrun her.
Nah, she doesn’t swallow people, just souls. But she is HOT… well if you go for an anorexic, Nazi, she/he with a cross dangling between the cleavage of her/his plastic breasts.
I would talk about my wang but you made me throw up a bit.
sometimes you just need to keep the wang sheathed!
Safer for the wang that way!
In this case, safety first!
Point of order… she’s too right wing to be Fascist.
As long as I can use a gag.
Uh, that would be an alligator that you can outrun by zig zagging. That doesn’t work so well when running from a snake.
To me, her looks and “personality” resemble a preying mantis more than either an alligator or a snake, but I think your comment was correct. Science win.
I laughed
SEE I know how to take a joke. Some of you people need to calm down when I comment. I really am a sensible likable person……….unless you are an English Major, then I am your worst nightmare.
hey trainwreck, i’ve always thought that you were funny…a bit odd, but who on this site isn’t a bit odd? Well there is guinny, eddie, jane (but i may be prejudiced there), lowly grunt, ema, froofrau, they’re not really odd, hell just about anyone, except you…and me, of course.
hey trainwreck, i’ve always thought that you were funny…a bit odd, but who on this site isn’t a bit odd? Well there is guinny, eddie, jane (but i may be prejudiced there), lowly grunt, ema, froofrau, they’re not really odd, hell just about anyone, except you…and me, of course.
I take exception to being labeled ‘not odd’.
Ok, boss, you are officially CF labeled as odd…welcome to the machine!
I still question your oddity…sorry!
Ok, how so? I can haz sources to my lack of oddity?
Why, certainly! Click my name for proof of your complete *eek* normalcy.
LMAO
Ironic response, considering.
My goodness…I got Hip–no–tized by those… what were those anyway, I lost at least three days staring at my computer screen while it shook!
[nasal voiced lawyer from the Simpsons]
You are hereby issued a cease and desist order from using images of my client’s hiney.
(That lawyer is based off Roy Cohn, by the way.)
weird double post, I must be repeating myself in my senility.
So I fall into the odd category as a given?
I am a D&D nerd and politics junkie. I guess that qualifies me.
D&D nerd, BDSM Master to Lynn, video gamer, overall wacko… Wait, I think I just walked myself into self labelling. Wacko it is then.
I’m old school D&D, late 70’s before it turned commercial.
… back when one had to know advanced math just to find out if you successfully opened a door. Ah, I do so miss those days. Now it’s just so… table top WoW.
(And all I have left to show of those days is a copy of the Fiend Folio.)
well, there’s things to be said foe each of the editions, but I am glad the integers are gone. Not that I can’t do math, just I’d rather spend more time playing and less doing math. I like 3/3.5e. I am still reserving my verdict on 4e. I’m going to have to gm it I think. I started playing on a campaign with a power gamer WoW guy for a DM, so….
It is definitely too commercial. I think they don’t get that not everybody is spending parental money on it and can’t really afford 100 books.
Here’s a nostalgic look at stupid d&d monsters. check my link.
I am a different kind of nerd. It annoys the hell outta me when tv shows have someone in a hospital, and the EKG is just random squiggly lines. My brothers got irritated with me when i saw that and said if the man’s EKG really looked like that, he is in ventricular fibrillation and about to DIE lol
You mean you don’t just watch the medical shows for the sex?
Also reserving judgment on 4th as I haven’t played it yet and haven’t had an urge really. I am digging 3-3.5 myself.
i like 4e and 3.5 as two seperate entities. 4e is more streamlined and I’m glad i started with it. it’s easier to just make a character and go for a one shot thing. 3.5 has a lot more in terms of character building i think, but it took god awful forever trying to figure it out. they have their goods and bads. I
d say 4e was an excellent start, i just wish there was more content.
My first D&D set was the blue boxed basic set, my dad introduced me to it in the late 70s. I stopped playing D&D the moment Steve Jackson released GURPS.
@ Faile So far I am finding the 4e too combat centered. All the powers the classes have are combat centered. It could be because of my GM, but I’d like to see more skill use, puzzle solving, other options for things to do for my char. I thought 3.5 better in that part. Like I said. Maybe if I GM a campaign I can see how it will work for a different play style. I am glad in either case to e rid of thac0.
I am interested in some of the ideas for 4e but I am not convinced to leave behind my couple thousand dollar 3-3.5 collection for it though.
Now all my links came through so it now looks like I was a serial poster about the dumb monsters.
4e is supposed to have online functionality so you can play at a distance?
We lost all my gaming stuff in a house fire. It never got totally replaced. I had a Drizzt mini that I bought cheap, that got vaporized. Now, I have a mix of 3/3.5 and the core books for 4e. I hope to replace more of what I lost in the future, but I’m too broke for any gaming stuff right now.
PK eated my post 2x now. See if it goes through this time. Here is a nostalgic look at d&d monsters for those looking at old editions.
Try to see if it will go through this way. Click the top link for a nostalgic D&D funny. Apologize in advance if my other posts go through multiple times, but I couldn’t get anything to post with that link, even in the body or the url line.
I lol’d muchly and referred the Orgy rules to Lynn at home.
Unfortunately i didn’t get into it earlier (lack of groups and knowledge) but i make up lost time by carrying my dice set around and using them to make decisions.
“It’s…a pleasure to meet you!”
20? Are you my soul mate?
minerva, you ARE odd, as stated before… welcome, my friend…to the machine!
It’s okay to be odd, Min. We can make fun of all of those “evens” out there. Besides, we odd ones are vital. Without us, they would spiral into mathematical collapse!
I’m ok with being odd. It’s much less boring than being a sheep! Much preferred in fact.
Yes, and the clothes are better, too!
May I be declared odd as well, please?
Until CF makes it official, I declare you temporarily odd.
Yay!
Sorry, I’ve been away…sometimes I do have to work…however, Kuromisa, I confirm your oddity.
That’s not an Adam’s apple. It’s just the curve of her neck. You can barely see the voicebox but it’s not sticking out.
I’m not *defending* her, mind you, but I really wonder about all the guys who say this… wishful thinking, maybe?
For Pete’s sake, she’s probably anorexic. At the least she’s got a massively high metabolism. There is no padding in her neck. You’re gonna see stuff.
Waaaay too many cervical vertebrae, though. I think maybe she is part snake?
“For Pete’s sake, she’s probably anorexic.”
I don’t think there’s any “probably” about it…
protuberance or not, I’d still do him er her
There have been lots of captions on this one. This was in the top three, easily! Has anyone noticed Ms Anne has gone radio-silent this whole political season? Surely she could figure out how to draw attention to herself, yes?
My suspicion is that she didn’t want to burn crazy-cred with any McCain support. I suspect she liked Palin better, but she would’ve preferred Huck. Just my $.02.
I’m wondering if she has moved to Montana, barricaded herself in a hillside compound with a stock of military-grade arms & ammo and some crazy followers.
We’d could only be so lucky.
no that’s not luck. I live in montana :< send it to the moon.
I think they usually end up in Idaho- send her there…too bad such amazing natural beauty is contaminated with the freak show parades though…
Hopefully, she’s forgotten rations and anything she could use to communicate to with the outside world. She always made the me wonder “Why the hell does she keep talking?”
she hasn’t. She coming’s to my school on December 3rd so we are already planning protestst like crazy.
Why? Why give attention to someone you hate? I’ve never understood this…you aren’t going to change her mind.
/me acknowledges the irony of saying this in these comments…
But then, I don’t hate her. I just don’t pay attention to her.
generally the idea is to get a message to other people (in this case other students) not mad ann herself.
But…(and I ask the people doing the shouting)…do you actually listen to what someone is trying to tell you when all they are doing is shouting and screaming? I know I don’t — instant tune-out.
It seems to me that on the whole, protests often are more about the protesters than the issues.
I think the protesters in Tiananmen Square raised international awareness of their plight. Do you disagree?
But were they shouting? The most enduring image of Tiananmen was the one lone person standing in front of a tank. Not much shouting is going to work there, I think.
OK, how about the protesters in Argentina that year their economy collapsed and they went through how many Presidents? They all went out into the streets and banged on pots and pans and made a hell of a racket.
Or the Serbians when they finally had enough of Milosevic.
And y’know, sometimes it’s just nice to see protesters when you agree with what they’re saying. You don’t feel so alone.
Therefore, the only way to get anything done is to raise a ruckus, shout down the opposition and throw a tantrum until your oppressors give up and let you have your way?
The examples you provide here, were not solved by shouting. Argentina is still a goddamn mess. There STILL are NATO forces keeping peace in the former Yugoslavia. Did shouting solve any of that?
Who said the only way? I think we should encourage our young pp to use their First amendment OBLIGATION to speak out when they disagree with something- Bush would have LOVED your viewpoint to take dominance before the invastion of Iraq- then those of us at his ranch would not have been there causing international embarrassment- protesting does not mean shouting down the other guy- it just means saying something else. And quietly can be effective- but so can loudly- MLK I have a dream speech was part of a rally that I woudl say was a protest..
You may, perhaps, acknowledge that one photo, no matter how poignant, cannot fully capture the deaths of 2000-3000 people, with many thousands more injured. And, yes, they were shouting, until they couldn’t.
You know what Stalin said about the death of one versus the death of thousands…
You are one solidly brilliant dood! Thank you–I needed that!
I’ll wager that, in your life experience, you have witnessed shouting which you deem unnecessary. Truly, most people would agree that campus parking issues don’t warrant a screaming protest. However, you may have the ability to see beyond your own experience, and realize that some causes are worth raised voices. Raising awareness is key, especially against oppression.
Now, c’mon…give me that broad brush. I’ll return it when you can use it appropriately.
Lynn likes my broad brush…
So true! Protesters so often seem to fall into the ’smelling their own fart’ genra.
They seem to care (get off on) caring, and being seen caring and current then they do about making any progress.
::sigh::
**They seem to care more about**
well, we plant to walk out and try to take like 80%-90% of the
audience with us when we walk out. I am also furious that my
tuition money is going towards a rcist like her who speaks for
about 5% of my campus
Are you sure that your tuition money is paying her fee? Or is it a privately- or separately-funded organization that is paying for it?
And what is wrong with being exposed to alternate ideas than your own? Are you that afraid of it?
Are you seriously trying to tell me that racism is some kind of “alternative idea” that people desperately need to be exposed to? Are you trying to imply that we aren’t exposed enough to it already?
Dude. Get stronger meds.
Do words threaten you that greatly? Dude, get a thicker skin.
I agree with the challenge to the question of tuition money – whenever a student organization to which I belonged wanted to bring in speakers or host events, we had to appeal to their better nature and/or raise some funds, after clearing the whole thing with the administration. As strongly as I disagree with her politics, as long as she doesn’t have strong support among the students or teachers, all her presence will do is stimulate dialogue – not poison the very air you breathe.
That being said, the “alternate ideas” comment is a straw man, as is the “do words threaten you?” response: they’re great ways to create a fight you cn win without addressing the issue at hand. Free exchange of ideas isn’t just about politely hearing her out because someone invited her; it’s about making the dissenting opinion known as well. Walking out is a valid form of dissent, and if 90% of the audience dissents, well so be it.
Granted, it may be more courteous to hear her out, but people have to make their own judgments about just how much courtesy is required.
As for the “words” thing, sometimes threatening is what words DO. Language is the foundation of ideas and intent. My relatives and former classmates back home may be entitled to spout all the ignorant bile they can get away with, but that doesn’t mean they get to do so unopposed, and anyone who thinks the thoughts behind those words are never put into action is hopelessly naive. While a thicker skin might make the words feel less threatening, I doubt it helps much once the threat is acted upon.
Yes, this is an extreme case, and I doubt Ann Coulter’s appearance at JJ’s school will spark some kind of riot, but where that line gets drawn is a personal decision.
But the fact remains that protesting Coulter’s presence is as much the expression of “alternate ideas” as it is the fear of them. And to be honest, there is a point at which you are allowed to think “I’ve heard enough of this crap” and walk out. While people may be entitled to express their views, that doesn’t mean other people are obligated to listen. And the walk-out that is to be staged is as valid (and harmless) an expression of those ideas as the speech itself. And much more polite than hanging around to argue or heckle.
*opens bag, finds treat*
An internet and a half to you, sir.
*applauds*
I think it is unfair to conservatives for her to be there. If she is the main (or only) conservative speaker to address the campus, conservatism isn’t being well represented. It would be like representing animal rights activists with PETA. I’m a moderate, if she was the only conservatism I was exposed to I would be extremely liberal
I don’t see her as a conservative. I see her as the Howard Stern of politics. She is a shock jock, not a political commentator.
Every group has its posers, but having some posers in the midst does not negate the matter under dispute.
Nesting fail. This was in reply to Odie.
I agree with you I don’t listen to crap being yelled at me unless it’s something along the lines of “hey, free icecream!”
However i think more calm forms of protest can be very striking. Does anyone remember a protester that is known for accomplishing something through yelling? I can’t think of one, however Martin Luther King Jr., Ghandi, so on. the peaceful protests seem to strike a chord.
I think they mentioned walking out on the event. I dunno how much that would help. people that are unaware of coulter’s suck wouldn’t know beforehand. Holding a seperate engagement, and passing out flyers. trying to get the talk as empty as possible the day of would seem the better plan.
Exactly. When I see or hear countless shouted arguments between factions (here in the Bay Area there is no shortage of them), the first thing I think of is King, and the quiet dignity that his followers employed, in changing the course of a nation.
Did Rosa Parks shout? No, she simply said “I ain’t movin’”. Three words that changed history.
MLK and Gandhi were as successful as they were because in each case there was a more militant group that they were contrasted against, both among U.S. civil rights leaders and among the independence movements (yes, plural) in India. Basically they were playing Good Cop, Bad Cop. The peaceful guys would get no attention at all if there weren’t other people yelling. This is probably a big reason Obama won the election. People have been yelling about Bush for eight damn years now.
Yes, Indian rioters and Malcolm X provided a nice contrast for the more peaceful tactics of Ghandi and MLK, but you really can’t expect anyone to believe that it was *because* of those rioters or the black militants, that Ghandi and King succeeded. It was the non-violent approach to change that effected the change. That would have happened without either the Indian rioters *or* the Nation of Islam.
Shame old Mal was offed by the Nation of Islam really…
As a side bar, NoI always been a source of amusement to me. Talk about not getting who was supplying the Western slavers to such a degree that Islamic slavers were allowed to raid the remoter bits of Western Europe for ‘white gold’ until the major players in Europe abolished slavery. For the most part US slaves were captured by either Islamic traders, or sold as ’spoils of war’ by tribal leaders to ‘whitey’.
and that’s why I’m not a ‘liberal’ in the American sense…
I’m quite happy to dance with the history.
History simply states that we are all a pack of bastards and that not paying attention only continues the paths we claim to be opposing.
Silence implies acceptance.
Rage against the machine, etc.
Lights out, guerrilla radio
Turn that shit up
*turns sh!t up*
No one said that you have to be silent. But like I heard (perhaps you) someone say in another thread, you attract more bees with honey than vinegar. It *is* possible to get a point across, to disagree, without becoming disagreeable. It’s just unfortunate that it happens all too little in these forums, and in real life.
You know, liberals have been saying that crap for years, and what happened? Too many people were nice. And we got run over.
If you want to turn the other cheek, go right ahead–may I remind you that the “peaceful” students in China were gunned down or imprisoned.
So, by your own reasoning, the only recourse is shouting? Like, crying babies, seeking attention?
A baby learns that crying gets it attention for what it needs done. A problem, if unannounced, go unreconciled.
May I remind you of some notable liberals such as Malcolm X, Rosa Parks, everyone who fought against segregation in the US…
If you don’t say anything, they’ll think you don’t mind…
The by-line of one of my fave sites ‘Jews on First’
Some folks (like me) like taking a big stick to a hornet’s nest.
She did say that she would support the Democratic party if McCain were selected as the Republican nominee. (Click my name for the video) I don’t know if she feels the same way about Obama as she did Hillary, but she might have felt that it was a sure bet that McCain wasn’t going to get nominated.
Oh that’s right–She famously hates McCain. I had forgotten about that! Now it makes perfect sense that she went radio silent for this campaign season. She couldn’t move over to the left far enough to support McCain, even as the lesser of two evils. I think Anne Coulter is the only one who truly believes all of that maverick business, including McCain. I think your other point is well made. The McCain campaign was probably going down for the 2nd time when that show aired. Thank you for linking!
It’s funny I didn’t even notice until you mentioned it. We really have had a lovely break from that …“woman”. I’m using that term very loosely as I don’t know if the creatures from her planet utilize sexual reproduction. I hope they do b/c if she starts eating a ton of Thai food and splits in two we are totally hosed
LMAO!! I read in National Geographic magazine that Anne’s ssssspeciessss lay eggs.
She does look somewhat reptilian doesn’t she?
I think her venom spewage is the dead giveaway.
She looks like an alien in this picture.
There was a caption up for votes that called her Jar-Jar in drag. It’s linked to my name on another post here.
Jar-Jar has far better manners and a much better personality. It’s even more pleasant to hear him speak.
On that note: where are all the people who should be up in arms about George Lucas’ racism? OMG is he really that powerful?
She’s only a visitor to the planet Common Sense, never a resident.
LOL!
Not even a legal alien…
She was actually spawned from the imagination of Robert E Howard…
Are you quite sure you don’t mean L. Ron Hubbard?
Serpent Men of Valusia was REH…
I was thinking of those octopus-like aliens in L’s “books”. I haven’t yet read Robert E. Howard. Should I grab a-hold of him at the library?
I’d give him a go. Bit dated, casually racist and very sexist at times… He did some pretty good atmospheric passages though.
From the photo, I would wager on Dr. Seuss.
he wrote some weird shit, but i doubt he would set loose such a terror. Perhaps she was spawned from Lewis Carol’s nightmares.
Edward Gorey!
sssssspppppiiiiddddeerrrrrrrrs lay eggs
Big Bang Theory reference FTW!
Thank you
Funny, I always thought “robot.”
Celene Dion is the lizard woman from Alpha Centauri, though.
I think it’s interesting anyone can look that much like a George A Romero undead without make up and be alive…
LOL
Hey Unc! Click my name for another fun comparison.
She’s more irritating than Jar-Jar…
I prefer to think she looks like one of the aliens from Independence Day.
That’s harsh… on animatronics every where…
Some of the SFX from the ‘82 version of The Thing?
She sort of has “man hands” to go with her adam’s apple.
@ Musicmom. Ewww is always my first reaction to this person.
LOL! One of the other captions said, “That’s not an Adam’s Apple, I just ate a mouse.”
It’s like the elbow of a conjoined parasitic twin…
LOL, thanks, I just spit my drink out.
I had to wait to stop laughing so I could reply. Yeah, but only if the parasitic relationship were reversed. Anne would never let anyone get a word in edgewise, have his/her own opinion, so I’m guessing she’s not sharing any part of the 1/2 carrot she ate this week, either.
Click my name for another caption. If you haven’t read the quote before, it’s pretty much Anne in a NUT shell (her natural environment).
I do like that one better! But I am a D&D nerd.
Oh I love it too………. I might have to do that to my players now.
I’ve been meaning to learn it for a couple of years now but never seem to have the time. Also, a friend is trying to get me to play WoW, which might happen when I have more cash.
D&D better than MMORPG’s imo. NOthing ever happens in those except going on raids to kill monsters for xp. At least with d&d you also get to find treasure.
Or get laid. Or use cunning social skills to get teh succubus into bed without killing you and then kill it for its treasure. Or convince it to be your sexual pet for further mischief later and get its treasure…
Book of vile darkness has lots of campaign arc ideas for this.
Got it. And Exalted Deeds. And Book of Erotic Fantasy. I had fun with a lot of the books.
Fable 2’s not an MMO, but you can get laid in that. In a group if you choose.
Yep, yours is better than the one above. But I also am a D&D nerd, and at times roll CE myself.
love it. i cant pull of a CE chara that doesnt die fast. LE is fun though
Is your unername a Wheel of Time reference?
Yes and no. Someone mentioned it and I liked the name. I had thouroughly adopted it before i realized where it was from >.>
~
truth be told i dislike Faile in WoT quite a bit.
I only wondered about the name. I think the Faile character is rather a high-maintenance whiner myself. It’s a pretty name though.
CE is something you have to think about in terms of gray and exceptions. A CE character could be very nice to a certain group of people and just disturbingly violent and wicked to other people.
Like how I planned a character who would bond with members of the party but then disfigure and maim anybody who dared to hurt them. Works even with intelligent creatures. Then again, I like being odd and wicked so meh.
Ever read Elaine Cunningham? She writes Elaith Craulnober just beautifully as a CE elf.
Is there a quota? I am having trouble getting my posts to work now. At any rate. I asked if you’d read any Elaine Cunningham. She writes Elaith Craulnober beautifully as a CE elf.
More serial posts. I guess the filter really had a problem with something entitled “head injury theater” even though this link was harmless.
I have a chara much like that, completely batshit insane, but steadfastly loyal to his cult, His passtime is stealing organs. I always described him as LE because he associates with the evil cult. otherwise he’s a crazy guy…with a bonesaw…and organs
CE can be organized, they can even be very strict taskmasters. They just have to have a chaotic goal. At least the smart ones, anyway.
Yep. Elaith Craulnober is one of these.
Nifty, speaking of evil elven bitches, Lynn and her sister will probably be playing this Friday…
Elaith’s a man, but it is sometimes hard to tell with elves. Thy do wear some pretty fancy pants.
Pretty nifty crimelord.
Get. Out. Of. My. Head!
LOL! D&D Nerds, unite. Wonder Dork Powers, Activate! Form of… An original Dieties & Demigods with the unauthorized ‘Fafhard & The Grey Mouser,’ ‘Elric of Melnibone’ and ‘Cthulhu’ mythos included.
Can we throw in 3e Faiths and pantheons for FR? I’m in.
*sigh* D&D. Hate it. Never played it. Never will. Ugh.
So you know you hate it quite how?
I’ll take a 2/2 flyer for 2w anyday!
Magic reference WIN! *loves*
Finallt!!
Can’t really hate playing something you haven’t tried. Why hate it? Most gamers, though dorks, are fairly nice people in my experience.
That makes as much sense as hating gays without ever meeting one.
To be fair, according to what he indicated, i_tego *doesn’t hate the players, just the game.* Gawd I’m good.
or good at it!
*hugs* If ya can’t be good…
DWN’s assessment still true in either case. Never played is the same as never met.
Yeah, that would be acceptable…if I were arguing a point, and not making a joke. If you’re still confused, I was paraphrasing a saying. (click name)
Link doesn’t work. (PK keeps borking on me!) “Don’t hate the playah, hate the game.” Anyway, explanation kills jokes.
I wonder if this person is a wow player >.> I find it hilarious the number of WoW players I run into who “hate” D&D without ever playing it.
I prefer the Chaosium stuff in hindsight.
Delta Green is my current opiate of choice…
Jesus Ann, try the lasagna…
Ouch, pepsi out the nose.
Thanks
Behold the power of the hatred of the Liberals !
?
That’s Bob. He only just rants. Leave him in his corner wearing whatever socks he’s got on today, to froth at his leisure.
You think he would learn how to troll relevantly, tho. Now he looks stupid and rude, instead of simply rude. I guess for what we’re paying, PK can’t afford better trolls. *sigh*
OOOH PICK ME COACH
Liberals are the vile and evil force that is sapping this country;s life force. The mayans predicted the world would end in 2012 and Obama will be the antichrist to end the world.
Good enough or do you need better trolling? lmao
Not angry enough Matthew. We really need to SEE the hate.
Wait, on second thought, we’re better off without. You can go back to being your more reasonable self.
Well i would, but i don’t have the patience to draw out the middle finger made of dashes
The hatred is reserved for wankstains.. Besides, shouldn’t there be a ‘d’ at the end of Minitar’s name?
LOL
…or a “t” if it’s a girl troll?
or a “p” if its an inanimate object?
Maybe he’s an itty-bitty sailor.
I’m sorry, Matthew, but your therapist has done too much good work with you. You don’t seem to have any troll in you anymore.
To wit, the request for other-user feedback totally violates Troll Rule 54 (a): We don’t take frickin’ customer surveys. The “lmao” is too jovial and happy, a clear violation of Troll Rule 142 (c): We are never jovial and/or happy.
*A+* for eagerness and effort, though.
No therapist, I just got to see my girlfriend for the first time in a few months
So THAT explains the big smile on your face and the sticky hands!
Okay, how does this sound: If you start getting moody again, we can use a code phrase like, “Have you seen your GF lately?”
lmao sure. I get to see her next week, and next fall, she is transferring to Texas A&M.
The funniest thing ever is that she is a vegetarian and has cooked me chicken
That’s consistent with how I am. I don’t eat red meat, but it’s a personal decision for me, so there’s nothing to flame about. Though it’s not my favorite thing to do, I’ve turned steaks on the grill for others. No bigs, really.
I went to Mayhemfest and some peta2 (yes apparently the original peta isn’t quite crazy enough for some) twits were harassing me about the chicken nuggets in my hand. I was a murderer and a heartless being…..
You tell them then that many mice, insects, moles, voles, possibly bunnies and woodchucks died for their farmed veggies. Also trees for farmland. Not hurting animals is a sort of misguided reason to be vegetarian. Most people have no idea what goes into producing food before it gets to the grocery store.
Not enuf mispeling and WACKY CAPS!!!!!!!
Nice try, though.
Commie.
Ah got it, thx.
*blows kisses to Bob, whoever you are*
There was one up for voting that said, “Oh, no! I couldn’t *possibly* eat that whole carrot!”
I made two LOLs. Click my name for one of them.
Here’s the other one.
You know she’s crazy when conservatives don’t even want to be associated with her.
I wonder how much they paid her to stay away from this one.
I read that Anne Coulter and Bill Maher dated in 2002. After you go EWWWW!! (regardless of persuasion), click my name for one of many sources.
I really like Bill Maher but I honestly think he will f*ck just about anything. Oh god…you don’t think her species can inter breed with ours do you?
With her calorie intact, she’s probably infertile
Spell check fail – in take!
I think it was a Freudian slip…as in, she only takes in one calorie per day!
I’m guessing she eats her young.
One morning she made eggs… so she fried them up and ate them…
I was picturing something more like the MST3K movie with all the squiggly worms.
LMAO!! Breeding? Any children she would have had would have run to sea shortly after hatching, lived a couple years as plankton, then crawled back to shore. Have there been reports of missing beachcombers yet?
.
As for Bill Maher, he’s sort-of famous for frivolous choices, but this one takes the cake. The visual makes me throw up a little in the back of my throat.
That would eliminate you from Bill’s choices then… he prefers them not to gag…
If Satan doesn’t gag her, I doubt Bill Maher would.
Gag…whom?
Anne C… although maybe that explains her long, long, neck.
LOL–You had me worried there for a minute. UF was talking about me, so, WHEW! You’re right about that neck. It adds a reptilian element to her looks, and that Adam’s apple is screaming for a scarf–d*mn!
Haw! This made me picture a fashion show in Hell, with a runway of jagged rock, techno pop music, and Satan narrating in the stereotypical basso profundo scary Satan voice:
“And here, Anne is wearing a jumpsuit made out of the souls of homeless children, which she has accessorized with a kicky scarf.”
I think my lack of “bimbocity” took me out of the running from the get-go, but he has plenty of company for the taking. His proclivities aside, I think a lot like he does, so the idea of him with…that…makes me ookie.
Maher hates women, so that explains a lot.
I think you may be confusing cause with effect.
LMAO!
WIN
Sorry, but Maher is a moron.
I find Bill Maher to be yet another comic who began taking himself way too seriously (yes, I am looking at you Al Franken). He seems to want to be seen as far left as he perceives guys like O’Reilly to be far right, but I still get the feeling that it’s all an act with him.
I find politics are so much better in the hands of guys like Stewart, Colbert and Lewis.
Xavier, I just swallowed my gum! I…uh…ah…a-gree with you…
*checks overhead for parting clouds*
Colbert almost manages to enact Poe’s Law…
“Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of Fundamentalism that SOMEONE won’t mistake for the real thing”
My dad, who would probably be considered a troll if he ever found PK, watched The Colbert Report with me once, nodding approvingly and agreeing all the while. I didn’t have the heart to tell him it was satire.
You are a good child. And you won’t be cut out of the will!
I don’t want to shatter his illusions…it’d be like telling a kid Santa Claus isn’t real.
Have you shown him the Correspondents’ Dinner? If he doesn’t get it by the end of that, there’s no hope.
Not yet. Actually, I missed that one myself. Is it online anywhere?
Truly! Colbert has made a lucrative career out of Poe’s Law, extending it into the realm of right-wing political thought.
THAT’S why she gave a glowing review for one of his books! O_O I wondered what the hell was up with that!
I’m going to go to the potty now, and not drink while facing the screen, just in case someone who likes Anne makes a comment on here.
Hurry back, we’ve got one. Either that or someone isn’t very good with the sarcasm
LOL–Sorry I missed the action, but I had to do some yardwork before dark here. I see the thread starter to which you refer, but it doesn’t look very smart. Oh, well–cover me, I’m going in!
I ened up cutting out too, silly work meetings. How do they expect us to get anything done if we’re forced to sit in a room for 2 hours with no internet?
LOL–The shaking right hands should be the tip-off that the meeting has gone on too long.
Ann, don’t feel bad. Liberals just don’t like it when you get all “truthy” on ‘em. They sure do love Michael Moore and Al Franken though! And God knows Olbermann isn’t a nutbag at all!
It’s sad, I liked Keith so much more when he was just a funny sportscaster — you know, before he started taking himself so goddamn seriously…
But wow, thanks for dredging up Michael Moore…and here I thought we were rid of him for good.
Yeah, I never liked Michael Moore, and I liked Olbermann before he shoved his head up his anus. But that’s just the social climate nowadays: people are more responsive to bashing of opposing ideas rather than listening and thoughtfully making your decision.
Agreed, truly unfortunate.
There’s nothing much to like about Moore.
I think it’s pretty safe to say that we just don’t like pompous, arrogant asses.
You’ve just itemised my salient features…
… in bed.
That’s funny–I didn’t know you were pompous.
He misread it — thought it said “pompadour”. Retro hair is in.
Somehow, the visual of “Uncle Fester” with a pompador hairstyle is wicked-stylin-cool. Creepy and Ookey, even.
Okay, I’ll be the one to stick up for Michael. I find his movies sometimes funny, sometimes informative, and wickedly provocative, though I’ll admit he’s pretty much the mirror image of a Fox News producer.
Yeah, they’re giving us Anne, so giving them Michael is a fair swap. Besides, if they ever want to take another one of our nut-jobs, we have a great pound-to-pound argument that way. Michael gets heavy (no pun) and highly selective on his facts, but he doesn’t spew venom and hate the way Anne does. Michael also engages in self deprecating humor. Anne would kill her flying monkeys before she would admit having burped once.
She writes her books as fact while stating few references for her info, except sometimes she cites her own books. Laughable. Apparently you fail to understand the satire of Colbert as well.
I was even taken in by Colbert’s performance for a while.
Poe’s Law.
…applied to conservative politics…FTW!
ann wouldn’t know the truth if it reared it’s ugly head and bit her in the ass.
It may get its teeth stuck in her leather–um, I mean–skin.
Teeth stuck in the *ass skin* of Ann…. brrrrrrr where is DWN’s wang…carefull DWN, don’t bring it out here!
My wang is at home with a good book, he won’t deal with this faggotry.
There’s not much hide of any sort before you’d hit pelvic bone…
Other than the implants, it must be like seeing a mediaeval image of death when she’s naked…
I read somewhere that a drop of her blood can eat through 6″ solid steel.
??? I thought that was Keith Richards.
no that’s kill 20 men
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Rush, O’Reilly, Hannity et al are just sweeties, but anybody who stands out on the opposite side is eeeebil! Okay, just think your thinks.
Go away Ann – you boney wh*re.
now, now… bony yes, but we don’t know she charges.
Smartass answer A: Who’d pay her?
Smartass answer B: You’re quite right, Unc; the correct term in this case would be “skank”.
Questions regarding Answer B: Why isn’t anyone a slut anymore? Why is everyone a skank now? I miss the good ol days when all we had were sluts, and everyone was happy. Okay, some more than others.
The cultural impact of Blaxploitation films and Gangsta culture on mainstream American thought…
Your answer spurred me into intensive research. I now have the first use of the word pinned down to 9 July, 1964, with the birth of Courtney Love.
Who would pay? Hell, who would hit that for free, except with a truck or a baseball bat?
Not Larry Craig, at any rate.
i would pay to see the scars under her skirt where the manbits used to be.
O_O
Those would have been very large man bits. Unfortunately, she ate them. …last thing she ever ate, in fact.
I wasn’t aware that her kind ate anything other than their mates.
Well, there was that orphan…but that brat had it comin’.
You remember the flashy-thingy from MIB? I would pay you to use that on me and erase any memory I had relating to that comment!
Ewwww!!!
You SICKO! I’m impressed…
mymymymymymy – can’t back off for a bit and leave it alone can you?
just remember, 2010, 2012, 2014, etc are yet to come.
I think you’re in the wrong place.
Cogent thought fail…
Election year knowledge fail
actually, there ARE elections in those years (Senatorial and Gubernatorial) , so the fail is on you.
Annie is running for President? Maybe she’ll pick a shoe-in for VP… I wonder who she could pick to beef her up in the polls enough to carry the election…hey i hear Alaska has a governor they want to force on the rest of the country just to prove they really are a state, therefore capable of shoving their crooked politicians on the rest of us.
Wait, is this the Olympics thread?
I hope so, then I get to see those German chicks in the boat again!
I hope so, then I get to see those German chicks in the boat again!
Is she still around? I think she wised up and stopped flapping her yapper.
I don’t think Satan skates to work regularly ATM
Nope. She didn’t wise up. She stopped flapping because McCain is too liberal for her, seriously.
Alright, y’all made me curious. I had to go and look up what she’d been up to lately. Click my name, apparently the new book drops after Christmas. Link includes some humorous guesses as to it’s title.
HAHAHAHAHA. some of the comments below are hysterical
er, “the secret diet of a mom who lost 44 lbs with $10″?
I hate Anne Coulter, but, honestly: She needs to fire Random House. What true-blue (okay, wrong term) conservative wouldn’t enjoy reading a book like that, with his family and loved ones, on a frosty Christmas day? What means right-wing whack-job dysfunctional Christianity more than hating together around a cozy fire? With chestnuts?
Liberals gathered around Punditkitchen hating conservatives along with their families?
I don’t hate your family. I don’t even know them!
What did you say? I can’t speak whine-ese, maybe you can learn American.
At least you didn’t say ‘English’
I’ve heard a rumo(u)r that American is based on English, and some of our words can be traced back to that source.
Of course, it may only be a coincidence.
Etymology is a black art…
No, clearly that would *not* mean “right-wing whack-job dysfunctional Christianity.” Reading comprehension FAIL.
.
To clarify: This only applies to you if you think Coulter’s book would make a sweet lil’ Christmas gift.
I think it would make a sweet lil Christmas fire…
*unbends coat hangers*
*grabs bag of marshmallows*
It’s the purging of her crap from literature that makes them taste so good.
~
Also…someone described her commentary as “Swiftian”…I died a little inside.
Although I could totally envision her eating Irish babies.
alive
with a side of puppy knuckles
It’s best to just ignore bob.
Oh, yeah. This is the not-too-bright one. Sorry, Min–It’s been a long day, and I’m only registering names in terms of “know ‘em” and “don’t know ‘em.”
Did the site eat my post?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmLJDrsaJmk
Best potrayal of her yet.
*bookmarks*
*cries* he gets links! I want links, why can’t I have links (without resorting to that stupid URI field)?!?!
The filter will delay or block those such links. URI is the safest way to go.
Here ya go.
Thats ok, I had one link that wouldn’t go through in either place. Maybe the name of the site got stuck in their filter? Anyway it was a harmless one about D&D monsters. *sigh*
I Heart U!
Amen to that.
Coulter.
Limbaugh.
One gallon of Astroglide.
Enjoy the visual and have a nice day.
limbaugh would be wearing the ball gag while Coulter does him from behind.
-
*brainbleach*
Commissar Fuklaw declares, “Double Heresy!”
OK… note for the diary… That comment impressed me.
The visual accompanying this would be the Edvard Munch painting “The Scream”.
Epic win on that caption!
I’m generally a democrat, but among many others, I certainly add her to the list that truly destroyed the GOP… which sucks, because she’s not even a politician!
In the newsroom where I work, we call her “The Fox News Crack Ho.”
Thats funny whenever I am with my friends we refer to Chris Matthews as the CNN crack ho! And Keith Olberman is his pimp!
Ha that’s good stuff
Why must the majority of pics on here be anti-republican?
Wasn’t eight years to destroy the country enough for you? You gotta take over all the blogs too?
I think “take over” implies that those views were fairly represented (or at least given equal time) in the media or on blogs like this one)….
for goodness sake. make some and submit them or vote for the others people have submitted.
I have, and have yet to see them come up. On the other hand, I keep seeing crap in the “Upcoming” queue that I’ve not seen in the “Vote” list, so I honestly wonder if there’s any point in it.
So yeah, PK shows a distinct bias, it’s kinda indisputable.
Ps. They actually have to be funny
Truly though, you can link us to some of yours and we will check em out.
I tried to get one up in time for the Jonestown 30th anniversary, link in name.
And another (click name), totally devoid of political commentary, but “just fits the pose” (like the McCain FUHGEDDABOUTIT! one)
OK those made me smile… and I voted…
This bitch looks like the anorexic version of Fabio…
I’m a moderate conservative and that woman sends chills up and down my spine. She’s pure evil.
Why don’t you just say you are a liberal “moderate conservative” means that you support liberal ideas and actions….
Nah. I’m a liberal, and I have a good friend who is a moderate conservative. There really is a difference. Unless you are a right-wing nutjob like Ann up there?
““moderate conservative” means that you support liberal ideas and actions”
Jared’s grasp of language seems adequate to express his opinions, but since you’re apparently psychic, how about putting that to constructive use by telling us which stocks to pick…
Oh, crap. Never mind.
God, I hope someone sets her on fire.
If any of you actually read her books, you’d realize she isn’t a fascist (Fascism and Nazism is socialism and inherently left-wing). She backs up every statement with fact…something libtards conveniently ignore when it shoots down their little ivory-tower worlds.
Jonah? Is that you? (Seriously, if fascism is inherently left wing, why were Communists all over the world opposed to Hitler, Mussolini and Franco? And why were Communists and Socialists summarily executed after the Spanish Civil War? History FAIL.)
Fascism is on the opposite end of the spectrum from communism.
She has nice cans but her face could use a few brown grocery bags. Her neck does seem to be extremely long!
I like Ann Coulter.
I LOVE YOU ANN COULTER!!!!
I DON’T CARE WHAT THESE CRAZIES SAY ABOUT YOU. YOU ARE BEAUTIFUL AND INTELLIGENT AND COULD MAKE THEM QUAKE IN THEIR BOOTS WERE YOU TO ARGUE THEM ON FACTS AND NOT EMOTIONS.
SORRY PK BUT ANN COULTER IS THE REAL DEAL!
i’d hit it
With a bat, maybe.
Ann Coulter makes you all so upset because you know you could not hold a candle to her in an intellectual conversation. Is it the fact that she is right so often that makes you all mad or is the fact that the media tells you to hate her?
Anyone capable of independent thought gets upset listening to or reading Ann Coulter. She doesn’t fact-check anything, and spews the most vile crap. “…the fact that she is right so often”…. can’t recall a time that happened. Your logic = fail.
So now would be a good time for you to porve to me where she has been wrong, your inability to recall a time when she was right is not proof that she is wrong, cite me one example of her being incorrect, just one I DOUBLE DARE YOU
Your rebuttal= FAIL
Oh and bye the way I am very capable of independent thought, hence the reason I refuse to believe everything my newspaper/CNN/Foxnews/internet tells me until I research on my own.
Actually, a better way for you to prove your point would be to cite an instance where she was overwhelmingly right. I don’t know much about her myself, but that seems to be how debating works.
“So now would be a good time for you to porve to me where she has been wrong,”
Well, for starters, she called John Edwards a “fag”.
“So now would be a good time for you to porve to me where she has been wrong”
Well, for starters, when she said John Edwards was gay.
People who cite themselves aren’t reliable, nice fail attempt at trolling.
Sorry, I know how upset commenters on PK get when someone who can actually think shows up. I’ll make sure to keep my opinion to myself since it upsets your pretty little liberal world. I know how devastating truth can be.
Sounds like somebody missed their nap today.
Nope, I just get tired of people slamming someone with no factual evidence. Ann Coulter does a great job at commentating and also comes up with very impressive points. Maybe not everyone sees it that way but at least they could prove it before they start calling her a liar.
Someone gnawed through the straps and stunned a guard to get to the internet room?
She makes up her facts, cites few references of source material, except sometimes her own books as sources. She has NO info to back up her claims. It’s complete fiction that she markets to gullible frothers like you, evidently.
Again I will pose my challenge. PROVE IT. You can make bold statements all you want, it sounds like mumbling at this point. You no longer warrant attention to your argument unless you can prove her facts are incorrect.
Your argument fails Minerva146 unless you can prove to me that her facts are incorrect. Go on prove it. If you can show me factual evidence of an Ann Coulter lie I will apologize for defending her. Until then, just keep talking to your drone friends here about how “evil” she s. I will assume you think she is evil because she tells the truth on you and you don’t like it.
Oh and by the by, what is a frother? Sounds like an insult but I find no definition for it out there.
“You no longer warrant attention”
I, personally, wouldn’t miss attention from this poster. How about the rest of you guys?
Not a bit. Too much of a “NO U” kind of mindset going on there.
I realized I probably should have explained that more a second after pushing “Add Comment.” What I meant was, we’ve been saying, “Show us an instance where she was right,” and in response, we get, “NO U.” Plus, I lose all sympathy right after someone uses “liberal” or “conservative,” or any derivative thereof, as an insult.
Yeah totally, oh wait not once did anyone ask for an instance where she was right. But if you want one she was right about John McCain, he didn’t win the White House. She was also right about Joe McCarthy, he wasn’t a witch hunter, he was a patriotic American doing his job, and everyone on his list was found to be linked with Communism, what did he get for that? A medal? nope he got blacklisted so that the very mention of his name inspires the words “witch hunt”
Ah the return of the sock…
Ah, the “invisible IOU”. That’s my shorthand for any argument that asks the other party to prove/disprove it, as in, “I have a piece of paper in my pocket where you wrote ‘IOU one million dollars’ and signed your name to it. Prove that I don’t.”
Actually, there’s a smorgasbord of stuff available on Coulter’s lies, half lies and avoiding the point…
But to dignify the necrophile with more than mockery is just pointless…
again, a plethora of information available on her lies but no single citing of ONE of them. Way to go Uncle Fester, you have proven to me that I am wrong…Oh wait, yet again you fail to provide any evidence. Necrophile huh? We are going to resort with sticks and stones, because you can’t make a strong argument. I think I will stick to just viewing the captions as opposed to posting, since the majority here are not smart enough to argue their points. And my energy is wasted on trying to explain to you. All I asked for was a cited example of Ann being wrong, and not one person provided it, oh sure there were plenty of allusions to her being wrong “out there” but not one citing. It must be nice to live in a world where it does not phase you to be so ignorant.
No puppetmaster, I’m just mocking you for the loud idiot you are…
but please, feel free to take your massive intellect somewhere that appreciates it…
And I’m not indulging you by citing anything, since it’s like teaching a pig to sing
It wastes my time and the pig would be none the wiser…
i love that saying, i’m stealing it.
Yeah I see why no one would miss him, since not a person has made a case other than name calling or emotions to refute his initial point.
Ah, now we have a sock… handy hint: It doesn’t add gravitas, simply more mockery…
No thats right no one could refute PKisfullofLibs points. I don’t think anyone here has made a better argument than that poster. perhaps instead of slinging more insults uncle fester you could maybe show how this poster is wrong?
Ah and yet another sock…
You really have nothing better to do… like torture small animals or beat a loved one…
On behalf the loved one I beat for her pleasure, I resent that, Good Sir…
My real feelings are a sock? I’m confused now.
No… I think your feelings would be more freshly ironed linen on a sunny day…
Get ready to apologize, then. Oh wait, you are totally incapable of that, and all you will do is claim that my sources are biased. But everyone rational will believe, so you fail. I don’t need to convince you, you are only one person. Click my name, that is one lie. Google ‘anne coulter lies’ or ‘anne coulter debunked’ for plenty more examples of her dishonesty.
Correct, blogs are biased. Pull it from a dependable website and prove it, don’t give me the Ann Coulter talked about NYT but cited Playboy crap. Or Frank Rich said we should meet with planned parenthood, not that we should talk to people who support abortion (planned parenthood)
You fail. That page was not from a blog, but from Media Matters, a non-profit organization. And it goes on and on, debunking dozens of Coulter’s traitorous, slanderous lies. You are a fool who has made up his mind and will never change his beliefs, but as I said, I don’t need to convince you. I need to convince the hundreds of normal people who read this site. I can do that, and you can’t. You fail at your attempt at propaganda, and your failure makes me all war and happy inside.
–
If you can disprove what this respectable website has found, I suggest you do so, or you lose in the eyes of the readers here. Go ahead, prove ANYof these allegations are false. I dare you to try. If you can’t, then everyone will know you have lost. You don’t want to big a loser, do you? Then prove me wrong.
Exactly we will argue over who is right or wrong in the matter of Evolution vs Creation, yeah and if i can prove my side or you can prove yours then that will prove whether Ann is a liar. Seriously the debate comes to who can prove or disprove evolution. A totally one-sided argument about how dumb Coulter is because she doesn not believe in Darwin’s theory is the basis for her being worng. This site only slams Coulter for not expounding on the fact that evolution is the only explanation. Yeah I can see that there is no bias in media matters.org they are totally balanced especially when it comes to evolution. But its cool, toss around word like fail and loser and throw in some good ones like non-profit and you got yourself a factual argument.
Evolution is not a theory. It is a set of very curious facts that need explaining. The specific interrelationship of species. Ring species. The archeological record. The evolution of entirely new traits, such as the ability to digest nylon. Speciation of fruit flies in the lab. The list of facts that need explaining goes on and on. The THEORY is called natural selection, not evolution. Get it? We have seen evolution happen in the lab. SEEN IT HAPPEN, okay? You can argue that scientists are all liars or something, but the facts stand: we have witnessed evolution happen.
–
It’s like gravity. Things falling is a fact. Gravity is a set of theories that attempt to explain why, and make predictions. I say ’set of theories’ because there are at least two in common usage. And we know both of them are wrong, but we still use them. Newton’s theory is the most commonly used every day, even though it is the most incorrect. Einstein’s theory works in more circumstances, but still not all circumstances, and so it must be wrong too.
–
You have a fundamental misconception as to what science actually is. Theories are never proven true in science, they are merely shown to be useful at making accurate predictions in certain well defined circumstances. Understand? Science can never tell us what the truth is. It doesn’t pretend to.
–
Evolution makes accurate predictions. Intelligent Design makes no predicitons. Because of that, evolution is science, ID is not. We don’t know, or even care if evolution is ‘true’ or not. What we do know is that it makes accurate predictions that have not been proven false in over a hundred years.
–
If you want an argument about evolution, do not try to raise any of the arguments that have been debunked over and over again if you want to be taken seriously. I suggest you take a look at a site like talkorigins.org, where all the common arguments against evolution have been debunked again and again. I’m not into repeating myself, so have a look there before you try to step to me with some stupid, out dated, debunked failure of an argument.
Let me consult my magic 8 Ball to predict the answer:
1.A. You can’t cite a source to back up your contention, therefore it’s only your opinion; B. The source you cite backs up your contention, therefore it’s biased and unreliable.
2.A. You’re not disputing my point, therefore I must be right; B. You are disputing my point, therefore I must be really getting to you.
3.A. I have more facts at my disposal than you do, therefore I’m right; B. You have more facts at my disposal than you do, therefore you overthink everything and/or it’s not really a question of fact.
Is there a name for this sort of thing, other than being a colossal pain in everyone’s ass?
Here is another site showing Coulter’s lies.
Aaaaand some more. Click my name for more Coulter dishonesty! I could do this all week and not even begin to touch on all of her lies.
I know how much you love being proved wrong and forced to apologize, so here is some more good old Coulter debunking fun!
Ahh you are so right I do need to apoligize, you have cited 3 blogs as credible sources, wow that’s so Wikipedia-ish of you. And then you come up with the final link to a factchecking group that splits hairs between the New York Times and Playboy. That’s all you have on her lies. That she started talking about the New York Times and then cited Playboy as well. Or that Frank Rich wasn’t insisting that we meet with pro-abortion planned parenthood, he was just insisting we meet with pro-abortion planned parenthood? Come on, little nuances taken out of context to make her look bad, let’s get with program, if your gonna slam her just stick to insulting her like your frineds here. Come on Seth lets dig a little deeper. Maybe you can find something really bad on her, or you might have to resort to calling her names and making fun of her looks. I will refuse to accept any facts from a blog, since anyone can put those out there, but God knows you will probably accept them as truth. Oooh I know, maybe you can come up with an obscure reference that shows her to be Rush Limbaugh’s drug dealer, oh and while you’re at it why don;t you make Sean Hannity the money launderer, now that would get everyone going here!
Wow. Just wow. This was a link to the Columbia School of Journalism, one of the most prestigious schools of journalism around. You fail. But as I said, I don’t need to convince you, do I
You are one lone wingnut. When people see this page, and they see how easy it was for me to find plenty of Anne Coulter debunking sites, and they see how I predicted you would act, and you acted exactly that way, they will believe the facts, and not your crazed lies. SDp, you failed badly at what you set out to do, and I succeeded.
Man, I lost this argument based on taking things out of context, who would have thought it. I thank you though for at least citing something, although I figured the Frank Rich thing and the Playboy thing would come up, especially since she talks about it in her book. Woe unto me for being bested by the likes of you. You are right, most people who look at this will find you as the winner, mostly because they won’t take the time to look at the context of the so called errors. Your’re right Seth I caouldn’t hold a candle to your argument because it was the Columbia school of journalism, journalism is all about integrity and they wouldn’t you know take something and drive it way out of proprotion or anything now would they, especially not to espouse their own beliefs. You are also right Seth and it saddens me that people will agree with you on this. But don’t worry there are plenty more like me out here and we know how to read between the lines. Seriously it’s not like she made up some huge myth about the enviroment being destroyed by man and how the world was going to heat up eight degrees and kill all the penguins and melt the ice caps, or wait is it going to cool down and cause an ice age, I can’t remember which is in this week but we should go green.
Look, even after being a total douche, if you back down a bit and start to debate ideals instead of slinging around slander, lies, and insults, people here will respect you. There are some VERY smart, funny, and kind conservatives here. It is no right wing echo chamber like freep, but it isn’t a left wing echo chamber like dailykos, either. Try debating on the positive points about your political philosophy instead of negative stereotypes about your
opponents.
–
American liberals are smart and decent patriotic citizens, for the most part. Just like most conservatives. Get it? We all love our country, and we all want it to be better. That is the most important point for you to remember, but the second most important point is that you will never change anyone’s mind with your current tactics. You need to convince people that your ideas are good for them, not that your opponent’s ideas are bad. What do you like about conservatism? Lower taxes? Smaller government? States rights? A focus on the constitution? Arguments in support of your ideals may convince undecided people. Disrespecting your opponents will not work, as we all witnessed in the last election.
Thank you!!!
Personally, I am somewhat put off by all this evolution squabbling. I am upset that the only sources cited are secondary sources, sources citing sources that cite sources. I call for anyone who has actually conducted an experiment (experiments) that either support or refute evolution to speak now!
…
No one? Ok, then everyone just drop it. Seriously, why are we arguing aout science?
You’re right Seth, there are a lot of fair minded people on here. People who automatically call Ann Coulter names becasue they don’t like her policy or who call Evoluton proven science even though it is hotly contested as a subject among scientific communites, except of course as I am sure you will point out, the places where you go for science. You are so right Seth, by nearly every comment I have viewed here I have seen there are PLENTY of conservatives roaming about and open debate is always welcomed. And you are such a legend in your own mind and the minds of others around here. I hope your little hierarchy of worshippers here always has your back so you can puff your chest at you so-called facts.
You are so awesome and enviable!
Don’t be flippant toward Seth. He has his beliefs and sticks to them, and very rarely delves into petty name-calling and sarcastic idiocy, as you have done here.
-
Unless the topic is Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin, and then he goes and gets his ill-tempered sea bass.
@ yourface Evolution is ONLY “hotly contested” by fundamentalist christians.
BTW, Froofrou is a conservative but can show respect for others and their opinions whether she agrees or not. It’s called “maturity.”
Also, Ann Coulter has been proved as a liar for a long time now.
Do you find the rock you live under comfortable?
@ yourface
P.S. You’re really not adding credence to Seth’s assertions that most conservatives are smart and decent, patriotic citizens.
Sometimes when Seth speaks I hear music in the background…….is “She Blinded Me With Science” a normal soundtrack for someone’s life?
How dare you! He’s not a lone wingnut… he has imaginary friend ‘Josh’ and his sock puppet army for company…
“Ann Coulter does a great job at commentating and also comes up with very impressive points.”
Translation: Ann Coulter has long blonde hair and wears the shortest hemlines on earth.
Sounds like someone is jealuous of the little black mini.
I, for one, favour a burka for Ms Coulter… with the mask and the mesh over the eyes…
Yeah, what other explanation could there possibly be?
“the lady doth protest too much”
You’ve spent too much time going “I can think, I can think intelligently, I don’t just believe whatever the media tells me” without any facts for me to take you seriously, that and you rather enjoy ad hominum abusive which further makes me think you have less than important things to say.
~
As for the subject of Anne Coulter, I looked her up and I still dislike her immensly. I’m not afraid of people that i can’t hold a candle to intellectually, I make a point of seeking out such people so there goes that theory of why i dislike her (assuming that I believe she is more intellectual—I do not)
The fact of the matter is I dislike her ideas, such as her idea that women are too stupid to vote and the right for women to vote should be removed (cause that’s the only reason dems get elected you know). Certainly my opposition to her ideas is not a normal mark that I hate a person, but it is the way she portrays these thoughts is deplorable. She describes herself as “stirring the pot” she is looking for a fight, not in the fashion of socrates by questioning the firm beliefs of others, but simply spewing her thoughts and shooting down opposition by calling them “liberals” in a way that seems to mutate the word to “leperous baby eater” her unappologetic, unforgiving stance that she is never wrong but the other side is just made up of monsters who can only throw jaunts and rocks in defense.
~
No sir, I do not dislike her because I believe I can not hold a candle to her in intellectual conversation, because that is not intellectual conversation that she partakes in. She has no spirit of debate, she does not accept different views with equal respect and consideration, she is simply a mean hearted bitch that is interesting enough for people to watch her, covering her hate speech with the mask of “it’s satire” so she can never be told she is wrong.
Maybe she had second thoughts about the sex change, but it’s too late now. Self abuse?
Yeah I understand that backing up a statement with fact can be confused as hate speech. I am also sorry that when you hear the word liberal it makes you think “leperous baby eater”, a little strange that your mind wanders that way. What I do find funny is that her rhetoric cannot be considered intellectual by you, because as you so eloquently put it “the way she portrays these thoughts is deplorable” that doesn’t like a good way to decide whether or not a conversation is intellectual. Pretty funny that you cite that she says women shouldn’t be allowed to vote, which was a joke, something you might understand better if it was about the President or the Vice President.
Your rant was very nice, I almost thought you were going to make a point other than “I just don’t like her”. Maybe you should go back out to recess and play dodgeball with your friends.
You looked up Ann Coulter and found out only negative things about her? Man, I would check a different source then, sounds like the one you got was biased.
I hate this woman and everything she stands for. But for some reason when I look at this picture my first impulse is to feed her a sandwich.
I have no idea who that is… But i bet YouTube does
It looks like a dude. The only thing remotely feminine is the bra stuffed with kleenex.
It’s silicon, not Kleenex
The reason the Commies hate Fascism and Nazism is because they are all in competition for the same sheeple…the liberals who vote with feelings rather than intellect. I’m not Jonah but I am a member of the military who has seen how messed up libtards make things (Sierra Leone, Bosnia, Kosovo).
Broad brush fail from Rightwingtard…
The only people who get upset with Ann Coulter are ivory-tower libtards who don’t know their backsides from a hole in the ground. Liberals think they are so nuanced and intellectual when, in reality, they are educated idiots. They are great at lying (Hitler and Mussolini both courted communism and when you strip away the rhetoric, they and communism had no differences in ideology- history fail back at you!).
Ah, finally something of vague sense about something historical… as to the rest… spleen fed garbage
Fascism not the same as communism.
You’re Right! Communism is responsible for way more death than Fascism!
Grouping communism and fascism together, how dare you insult fascism that way!
Depends how you’re defining ‘Fascist’. Most ‘Country First’ initiatives are fascist with a small f. Most religious movements have have had, or still have, a social hierarchy which owes much to fascist thinking, replete with ’sinners’, ‘heretics’, ‘apostates’ and ‘unbelievers’ to be reviled and either converted or removed…
There are a lot of socks on here today. They’re supremely Pissed about the monkeys.
No but both Hitler and Musollini dallied with the idea before going Fascist.
My wang, has no words.
wasn’t Max supposed to contribute body parts at this point too?
His nose actually since the C word was used.
It seems that UF doesn’t have the brainpan of a hamster.
1. Ann Coulter’s books are thoroughly researched and footnoted…have you read any? Come to find out, McCarthy was right about those left wing traitors he was going after.
2. Liberals/Progressives (notice how they are always repackaging themselves to hide the true commie ideals they have deep down) hate being shown their own stupidity. When faced with fact, they immediately make character attacks.
3. I have yet to meet a liberal who has a clue about history…UF included. They take snapshots of an event and ignore the greater reasons and that means they make the same mistakes over and over.
4. I have yet to meet a liberal willing to shed their blood for an ideal. They are great at demonstrations and slogans but you can’t find a single one when it really counts. 17 years in the military and the only liberal “heroes” I’ve seen are Kerry and Murtha and they are both guilty of treason!
And yet another sock… my this adds gravitas to the argument…
How nice…
and you idiot, I’m not a Liberal.
1. Those footnotes are all made up. People have tried to verify them, and they couldn’t. See footnote A
2. Conservatives wouldn’t know a fact if it bit them in the ass. Just making something up and claiming it’s a fact doesn’t, you know, actually make it so.
3. Care to dance? Give it your best shot, I will demolish you in regards to knowledge of history, both in recall of facts, and in analysis.
4. I have shed blood for my ideals. Food not Bombs, San Francisco. The mayor had a special police task force crack down on us for giving away free food. I had my head stomped on by the police for trying to feed homeless people. My grandfather was a staunch liberal, and he served with distinction in the cavalry in WWII, eventually becoming a base commander in Germany.
–
Footnotes:
A.) “I’m a total liar. I just make things up to piss off liberals.” Anne Coulter, ‘What a Big Douche I Am!” p178, Doubleday 2003
You can claim whatever you want UF…if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. Keep insulting conservatives and praying for the government to run your life and you’ll end up no better than a prisoner in a soviet gulag. That is when you’ll call for someone like me to rescue you from your own stupidity. I doubt you have ever been outside the country (I’d bet you are early 20s from the way you put thoughts to paper) and have never seen the results of liberal treason.
ROFL… you really are a keeper…
You are hilarious. Serious delusions of grandeur, paranoid fantasies: you make conservatives look idiotic. Good thing there are some real, intelligent conservatives here for us to debate. You know what happens when UF insults those conservatives? Liberals and conservatives both band together to defend them. Have any conservatives here rushed to your defense? No? I wonder why not.
Seth, I insult EVERYONE…
your mother smells of wee…
Equal opportunity insults. Yay.
Well, honestly I’m trying to stay out of this lol because it’s just so hateful and vitriolic. I wonder how the atmosphere would be if there was a lol on Bill Ayers on the front page? Probably not near as bad as this one.
Could be because there aren’t any conservatives here.
Could be the Conservatives there are may have an IQ over 8, possibly one or two into middle double figures.
Let me guess…you are probably an anarchist from the tone of your religious comment. That makes you even more misinformed.
You have an imaginary friend too? Cool! What’s he called?
And believing in magic really adds to the depth of your shining whit(sic)…
Feel free to koin the long line of people who think Old Uncle Fester is an idiot btw, I’d hate you feel alone… you’ll have lots of company here
When I was 8 I had an imaginary friend. He was a badger called Sprout. Me and my friend had about 12 each actually, but I started it with wee Sprouty.
Cool… how many people did he tell you were evil?
Just our supply teacher….
(Actually she was a demon from “Railworld” in disguise (Yes, we invented Railworld too))
Cool.
Just because someone has disdain for organized (or any other kind) religion doesn’t make them an anarchist. Society doesn’t need religion to form a cohesive whole and function.
Im not defending the words he chose, but i will back SK up (in a weird sort of way) UF again randomly interjected how crazy christianity is, calling God an imaginary friend who orders hate. Isn’t hating people for hating others… well hypocrisy?
Yeah, but anarchist? Not really the same thing at all. I don’t always agree with Fester, but I see his point that a lot of people hide behind a religious shield to excuse their hate, bigotry, whatever. In the case of modern christians, a lot of them pick and choose a few parts of the bible that fit their latest convenient target, while ignoring passage after passage that say the opposite.
Example, they point to Leviticus to “prove” their god is against homosexuality, while ignoring the possible implications of David’s love for Jonathan. It’s very hypocritical. You can interpret the bible in many different ways. Nobody can possibly know the original intent of any of it, as we have no contemporary people to interpret the writings.
Fester does go about it in a condescending fashion, which I try to not do unless some troll deserves it. I do, however relate to his implication that religion, particularly christianity and the other abrahamic, or “revealed” religions, can really color people’s views in some really crazy ways, including blinding them to the bare bones facts sometimes.
Side note: Not only David and Jonathan, but also Paul and Timothy. It would make sense in the context as well. Paul is described as having a ‘thorn in his flesh’ that caused him all kinds of problems, and most mainstream Christians want to see that as something like an eye problem. Well, Paul was a voracious reader and writer, and eye problems wouldn’t fit. He didn’t have a scribe, after all. He was a Roman citizen, which means he cavorted in that world, which included huge doses of homosexuality, especially with young boys. Paul knew that homosexuality isn’t the best path, but he struggled with it (in my opinion), and possibly carried through with it after his conversion. He had many young male friends who were closer to him than brothers. It would stand to reason that his ‘thorn in the flesh’ was being gay.
-
…..in bed.
Like I said, i didn’t defend SK calling him an anarchist. But UF did randomly interject “Oh, BTW, christians are crazy” and I already pointed out the saddening truth that many christians do ignore the law Jesus said was the greatest, and that was “Love your neighbor as yourself”. But to slander an entire religion based on the actions of a few. When someone makes a generalized statement about a group based on the actions of a few, that is called bigotry, hate etc, jut look at the list of words he provided about Christianity.
Min, it’s not condescension… it’s ill concealed contempt
Matty! Bubba!
I usually find that the loudest most crazy reactionaries (like you) seem to prop their world view up on some god or other. You assume I simply am anti Christians… nope, bless your tiny superstitious head, I regard all religion a lot like Homer Simpson regards beer: It’s a solution (since it stops people like you going insane in a crowded place with a fire arm) and cause ( it means that people have a reason to be able to call other people ’sinners’ and justify whatever bull they like) of all our problems.
No, I would like to see her….and violate her in perverted ways.
I think it’s nice you have an interest in something other than the internet…
that bitch needs to eat a sandwich
If only we COULD forget her.
You are sexist, friggin idiots. Diversity is fine as long as it agrees with you. Brown shirts!
look… I don’t really like her views a whole lot all of the time… but seriously people, grow up.
whether you like her or not.. she is one hot MILF.
I may not always agree with Barack either, but he looks way cooler that the McCainiac.
Hot MILF? Ecco da puta, you like people without the healthy glow one associates with someone who’s been dead a week!
You are sexist, friggin idiots. Diversity is fine as long as it agrees with you. Brown shirts!
Sock puppet fail!
That explains a lot…you are a brain-dead troll who just likes throwing insults rather than providing any intelligent comments. I don’t hate you, I pity you. People like you make me wonder why I reenlist to protect this country. You should try shovelling out your crap in places where I’ve been sent to protect your rights…you’d be killed in a matter of minutes by those third-world thugs.
Object lesson of the day there from SK: When in doubt, invoke macho posturing and patriotism…
Gimmie a big wet kiss, butch boy… I bet you have the BIGGEST Tom of Finland collection in your unit…
“You should try shovelling out your crap in places where I’ve been sent to protect your rights…you’d be killed in a matter of minutes by those third-world thugs.”
~~
So… You’re protecting our Constitutional rights, presumably including free speech, but are offended when we actually use them?
He’s not protecting mine, but I’m English.
Besides her various acts of a**h***ry she just creeps me out to look at. Her bodily proportions are just wrong. Arms and legs and neck are all too long. How do you end up looking PhotoShopped in real life?
By throwing up everything you ever ate…
By throwing up everything you ever ate and having implants
Some how it took a moment to vomit forth my original deathless prose…
Yeah, but, presumably, since he’s single-handedly saving the world (and telling us all about it) he protects sassenachs too.
Stinking, mucked up, nesting…
When you’ve lived as long as I have, in the environments I have, and stayed as pretty as I am, you really don’t need pumped up, ‘roid using, posturing degenerates, who mouth bellicose inanities to look after your interests… there are few problems diplomacy, a well placed thumb, three feet of rubber hose, cold steel or hot lead can’t settle reasonably quickly if you know what you’re doing…
The above was in reply to the post Below by AC
I’ll take door #1 …
Yeah, but, presumably, since he’s single-handedly saving the world he protects sassenachs too…
Yeah, you do sound quite old. Didn’t SK decide you were in your 20’s?
Presumably, he’s just turned 30 and so can afford to be patronisng about them…
NESTING!!!
That was @ UF…
I guessed…
I didn’t even think as old as 30… the noise reminded me of some 18 year old squaddie, all piss and vinegar, with a fresh buzz cut, somewhere between Steve Rogers and Rambo… ready to save America from Gah-dahm lbruls for mom and apple pie on Sunday (although why incest mixed with food fetishism is so popular I’ve yet to see)
Wow. Someone give that woman a burger.
Just about what I figured…UF is a typical moron who insults anyone who has the least bit of honor and integrity. I have served for 17 years and in 16 countries. I have buried 6 friends after Khobar Towers and fought in Bosnia and Kosovo. I’d love to meet you face to face and see if you have the guts to insult me then. You are a big man when hiding behind a computer and are typical of the libtard, daily kos, moron-dot-org crowd. You are a coward and an ingoramus. How about you get off the kool-aid and do something with your life. If it wasn’t for people like me, you’d have been beheaded by now.
Wow, how judgmental. I forgot, only conservatives can be patriotic or have any integrity or be allowed to have opinions of any consequence. Nice broad brush you’ve got there. if you’ve a problem with Fester, address him. Don’t insult everybody who may have a different viewpoint.
Doesn’t the ‘Starship Trooper’ line get old fast?
From a man who’s only ever defended oil and mineral interests, too…
The idiot with a neck wider than his head is still hanging in there…
This is too much fun!
And I’d say you’re the one making threats from behind a computer screen while trying to make Audie Murphie look a pouf…The real men don’t need to actually ’strip their sleeves and show their scars’ to know they’re men.
Trying to give some Avuncular advice: Currently you’re just making the services look bad, laddie. Posturing is for those who were ‘there’ but did nothing. The ones who were REALLY there wouldn’t be troubling us with what hell they’d seen unsolicited, and often not even when asked.
You really are a terrible, terrible example…
No. I only insult fools who don’t know a thing about how the real world works. Liberals are destroying this country and it will collapse because of them. Then it will fall on people like me to bail you all out. I have yet to meet a patriotic liberal…all I hear from them is how bad this country is and how they hate conservatives. Liberalism is a mental disorder. You don’t see conservatives throwing rocks in riots. You don’t see conservatives going to meet with dictators and bad-mouthing America. Joseph Kennedy (a hard-core liberal) thought Nazism was a good idea. Senator Byrd (D-WV) never renounced his KKK affiliation but kisses butt with Obama. Liberals love to riot, throw trash and waste at the military (I have been spit on while on the DC metro while going to the Pentagon for being a “Baby Killer” just 6 months ago). Liberals want to destroy the Judaeo Christian values that our Founding Fathers used to build this country and dumb down the population to make us all the perfect sheeple. Wake up Minerva and live up to your name as the Goddess of Wisdom and War.
First of all, We were founded as a secular nation, not a christian one. That Wall of Separation is supposed to remain firmly in place. There are man, many sources to support this.
I, for one, sir, am very patriotic. I have family values. Sorry, conservatives don’t have a monopoly on patriotism and family values. Seth had a great post about this the other day. I don’t insult people who haven’t deserved it. When arguing a point, I speak respectfully and provide sources to back up my suppositions. Apparently you never heard “Dissent is the highest form of Patriotism.” –Thomas Jefferson
Liberals throw rocks? When has that happened, like once, twice? “Conservative Christians” think it’s ok to bomb abortion clinics. (See how that broad brush works?) Do you see many of the liberals throwing the “—tard” descriptor around like the conservatives do?
Meeting with dictators? Care to be more specific? Presidents of all party affiliations have met with the leaders of countries that are ruled by “dictators” for a very long time. Musharraf was Bush’s ally supposedly. What about the Saudi Royals. Saudi Arabia houses terrorists, but they are supposedly our allies too.
You have a lot of hate and misinformation considering you think neo-cons are the only ones with any knowledge, wisdom, and morals.
“You don’t see conservatives going to meet with dictators and bad-mouthing America.”
“
Bish plz.
Conservatives have backed dictators like Somoza, Pinochet, Joseph Mobutu, and the former Shah of Iran, just to name a few. We have, at various points in our history, supported Saddam Hussein when he was of use to us against Iraq and Al-Qaida when they were of use to us against Russia in Afghanistan. I see no reason to suppose that they won’t continue meeting with, kissing up to, and financing dictators, up to and including Satan, if said dictator makes the right noises about being against the communist/terrorist/whatever boogeymen of the moment. Our country’s history of backing the wrong horse would be funny in a reverse-psychology, Bill Kristol-esque way if it hadn’t had such tragic results.
He said it….
“Liberals want to destroy the Judaeo Christian values that our Founding Fathers used to build this country and dumb down the population to make us all the perfect sheeple.”
ROFL… the man has the intelligence of a gnat! Critical history fail…
i don’t know who this lady is, but i’m not sure i want to!
i might get pissed off!
How is it that no one has shot this woman yet?
You might enjoy our discussion on this lol regarding how best to do away with her.
I would force her to blow me!
the evil spawn of Eva Braun
Her name is Anne Coulter, and she’s so far to the right, she can’t even live in Earth’s atmosphere. Okay, I may be exaggerating. There are a lot of videos about her on YouTube.
I don’t ascribe to Ann Coulter’s views, but I do have to admire her zeal. She believes something, and she doesn’t waver. I may not like it, but I respect it. How many people do you know who believe something and won’t let public opinion change their minds?
-
Dont’ flame me. I don’t particularly like her
yo watched her on utube. dmn that would be a quiet disturbin fetish bondage
milf porn. nooooo i don´t want imagine any farther, bad thoughts go out of
my head. rofl.
No flamet the only thing that she believes in is sucking money out of really dumb conservatives.
Hmm, you admire her, I want to disappear somewhere with her for several days, and then scrub myself in a hot tub full of alcohol. Which of us is more reprehensible?
That’s a point of view I see often but just don’t understand.
Why is not wavering and being totally inflexible a good thing? Why is not letting in any new or different ideas admirable? Why is being totally venomous and hatefilled ok if it’s sincere?
I hope you don’t consider this flaming, but I just don’t understand that viewpoint. If you care to take a crack at explaining it, that would be appreciated.
That’s not a virtue. I have more respect for someone who is willing to look at the available evidence (and not poll results either) and adjust their beliefs accordingly.
Do you know, I don’t believe that woman has ever spoken to an actual liberal in her entire life? She rants about strawmen, not about real people.
I don’t think she actually believes most of what she says, as much as she says it because there’s a big market for it, and because she gets lots of attention when she talks. She’s an IRL troll. That’s why normally I would support a counter-demonstration to a speaker like her, but in this case I think ignoring her completely would be better.
Hey, what you do in the dark with yourself and others is your business
I’d suggest a bath in Everclear for your naughty bits when you get done, though 
PM, you have issues, SRSLY. Do you have alien abduction fantasies, too?
would the hot tub of alcohol be to remove forensic evidence? I’d consider the Dexter method, since it’s pretty practical, as long as they don’t find the dumping ground…
I agree wholeheartedly. Blind devotion to an idea even when presented with facts to the contrary points to an inflexible mind, incapable of assimilating new ideas. there is a difference between flip-flopping and actually allowing yourself to be open to new ideas and persuaded by evidence/facts/science.
Intransigence is NOT a virtue. Regardless of how loud/obnoxious/judgmental you are.
The only reason I can respect blind devotion is because I see people in my own religion (to use it as an example) swayed by the ‘masses’ all the time. People give up what they truly believe simply because it isn’t popular. Like I said, I don’t agree with it, I don’t particularly like it, but it’s interesting to see someone who can’t be swayed from her beliefs.
-
As far as blind devotion goes, I’m not stupid. I realize that it has caused massive amounts of devistation over the last several centuries, the least of which was the Crusades. God forbid you actually have good reason for your blind devotion, no, let’s just follow like little lemmings off the cliff.
-
I’m simply pointing out that you don’t see people who actually have a belief system and stick with it any more. That’s not commenting on the right-ness or wrong-ness thereof, simply that it IS
Everclear on the naughty bits? Ow.
(Not that she does anything for me, so therefore a hypothetical) I would just coat myself in several layers of latex, somewhere between 9-12 mil.
Ooh, cleansing and numbing, good thinking!
I would do an entire body latex suit, personally. Even though latex isn’t a kink of mine, I just don’t know where that’s been. And knowing that it’s been around Bill Maher……..ick! *crawling skin*
That’s the smartest thing I’ve seen posted so far. Do I get on your odd list, now???
Oh, now froo… You know you want that screaming libbie for some angry sex. You’re among friends here–It’s okay.
*whug* I think I just threw up a little in the back of my mouth.
-
I’ll stick to angry sex with angry Repubs, thank you! They have better toys anyway
I’ll go with you on that one. Those flippin peace pipes are splintery!
Really? Repubs have better toys. Maybe I’ll switch…or at least go toy shopping with one.
As a moderate with awesome toys, I sent that, girl…
As a moderate with fun toys, I resent that…
I see – sort of. The reason you cite for changing one’s mind (popular opinion) is indeed a stupid one, and I can respect someone for not changing their mind on that account. I just don’t see that that’s the same as a person who won’t change her mind for any reason.
I actually know a lot of people who refuse to change their minds because their opinions are unpopular, but can be swayed by other reasons. Maybe I’ve just been lucky in the people I’ve found, and if so, I’m grateful for that.
New and proper evidence should always change one’s mind…
Blind devotion to anything usually leads to lynch mobs and mass graves.
I have yet to find a reason to respect a person for beating their head into the wall because they can’t be deterred from further head to wall smacking. I call that ignorance.
Adapt or die. Principles can be worth dying for but if your principles require a lot of dying, perhaps you need new principles…
k, thx. So she also wanna have kids from a ugly dwarf that is tottally insane,
hey wait history is reapatin, mc cain is down so no addequet father available.
mehehee
I don’t understand all of this talk about alcohol cleansing, anyway. I have it on good authority that her kind eats the male soon afterwards.
I was think of merely chopping it up and hoping one didn’t grow from each bit
LMAO!!
Something about evil, crazy women just does it for me. I ain’t proud of it, and I try not to indulge in it, but even when I think I meet the nice ones, it usually turns out I chose badly again. When I haven’t, they’re to vanilla normal for us to have a decent amount in common.
And no, alien abduction fantasies would just be crazy!
Reread what I said. I never said I agreed with her, only that it’s difficult these days to find someone who isn’t swayed by mass opinions and the popular beliefs. Ann Coulter isn’t leading a crusade to convert or die, but she is sticking with her particular set of morals. I can respect her for not swaying.
She has morals? Somehow monomania and narcissism don’t seem to be indicators of strength of character.
She doesn’t have morals. She considers herself an entertainer, not a pundit. She doesn’t really believe most of the things she says, especially the really radical things. She is a professional troll, she makes money by stirring up controversy. That is why I don’t like her. Not because she really thinks liberals are traitors. Because she doesn’t think that, yet she says it anyway. I think in her head, her audience ‘gets’ that it is all a joke. They don’t. She is stirring up real hatred, fear, and divisiveness to get a laugh.
I did, you said that you respect the fact that she isn’t swayed. That sounds like appreciating Ted Bundy for keeping to the cause despite all illegality and him being a psychotic.
I can respect unwavering zeal when I see it applied to something worthwhile. When I see it applied to something overall appalling, I don’t say that I appreciate their gusto. I simply ask myself why they can’t see what I see when they probably have as much or more access to information as I do.
If I somehow got your husband into a position where I was just kicking his nuts in, day in and day out, unstopping, unflinching, would you want me stopped or would you play Devil’s Advocate and admire my unwavering drive as I hammer your man’s crotch into the wall?
That is how I feel about good ole Ann the Man. She is just kicking them nuts in, over and over again, not stopping to evaluate if she should or not, just making up more reasons to keep kicking. Why on Earth would I respect that level of foolishness?
HER morals, not mine
I dont’ agree with her! And you can’t tell me that you don’t fit at least one of those……possibly mysogeny thrown in the mix for some spice 
I know your morals are flexible… I was just surprised one could scratch up respect for someone who clearly has less respect for others than I do …
My DETAILS are flexible; my basic morals haven’t changed and won’t.
No, I’d say you were flexible…
Gays – let god judge em
Murderers – I want to slip the needle in myself…
that’s flexible…
Wait a second, look at the apples you’re comparing to oranges. One has a choice in what they did, the other doesn’t. See the difference?
In Froofrou’s defense, she hasn’t stated any violent intent against gays. Simply stated her stance and that it wasn’t her place to judge. It was God’s. As for Murderers, I am for the death penalty if we can actually prove that the person did the deed.
See the difference? Not really. Isn’t that for God to decide? Does God’s
forgiveness not extend to murderers who truly repent? Can you see into their hearts? Can you see into the past with perfect clarity, so as to know the truth of their actions, and what was in the heart at the time?
–
I understand your feelings. I really do. But people’s feelings are not always accurate guides towards right actions. Consider, even if you see someone murder, even if it is in cold blood, even if it is your family member. The murderer is a son of God too. What happens if you kill them? What if they have not accepted Jesus as their savior, and are not in a state of grace? What are you taking from them? What if they were just about to realize their sins, and ask forgiveness, and you kill them before they can? You do not know the future. You do not know if they will, or when they will, ask for God’s forgiveness. It is not your place to kill them.
–
And that is only considering the spiritual harm that you may cause them, not the certain spiritual harm you cause yourself if you do not forgive them. Sure, one can make the argument that one can forgive and yet carry out capital punishment. But that argument can only be made on pragmatic grounds, and based on the emotional content of your posts, I do not believe you have forgiven the people who do evil in the world.
Actually I don’t look at murderers from the viewpoint of Godlyness, I think you would have realized that by now, Seth. So your religious argument doesn’t mean anything to me. I approve of Froofrou’s view on gays because it means she leaves them alone and doesn’t judge them. As for murderers, I see it from a practical standpoint.
If you take a life, your life is forfeit unless you are defending the life of yourself or those you love. It isn’t that hard and doesn’t require some cosmic justice from a boogey man in the sky to do justice for me.
So I am afraid that you wasted a lot of words about a system of beliefs I only agree with sometimes because of the practical nature for the common good. I do not know the future thus I don’t pretend that a guilty murderer will repent but I certainly believe that he should face consequences for what he has done.
I certainly do not believe that I should pay for his repentance as a taker of lives as I am not compensated for obeying the rules. I understand that petty crimes do not deserve death and money for their incarceration is required so I deal with that as a necessary annoyance. However, I do not believe in coddling any criminal based off their “potential” good nor do I believe that murder deserves less than what they gave their victim.
And I suppose I will wait for your slippery slope argument.
Well stated, DWN.
I see your point, and I think we’re agreeing on part of it
The bit about ‘unwavering zeal…..applied to something worthwhile’ has my vote as well. Ann Coulter is putting forth a line of thought that is extremely right wing, but not completely off the wall (some of the time). THAT is the part that I admire, coming from a right wing stance myself. I guess because I’m further to the right than you are it doesn’t seem AS extreme to me. It’s extreme, but not the gut-busting ‘oh my god she’s a damn freakazoid’ that you’re seeing. It’s all perspective.
Especially since I figure that you and Seth would get together and bury me in a mountain of corroborating evidence stating that it was necessary for the good of humanity and the planet and any after life for you to bust in my hubby’s nuts 
-
And if you had a good reason to bust my hubby’s nuts day in and day out, I guess I’d have to let you do it
Thank you, I try to simply things as best I can. @_@
I disagree. It’s not a good analogy at all. In the two cases described, both are breaking laws and/or causing bodily harm to another. Neither of those are equivalent to holding onto an ideology, which hurts no one and breaks no laws.
…and a screwy fashion sense.
It’s holding on to the ideology that the kicking is the best course of action, he meant the idea of it, not the action itself.
Hmm, not seeing it — pretty clearly stated that in both the nut-kicking as well as the mass-murderer, the actions continued while zeal was admired. Except, in the case of Coulter, unless I missed something somewhere, she hasn’t killed anyone or (at least directly) kicked anyone’s nutz — she’s just, well, Ann…
The point is sort of that her ideas are also dangerous, albeit by a varying degree. She incites hatred in the slow-witted and/or sheep like followers. Fanaticism is dangerous in almost any subject as it can lead to violence and a whole lot of other things in the name of an ideal.
And the same can be said for any number of zealots, activists, whatever, on the left as well. Someone here (froo I think) pointed out that Ann looks so “dangerously” right to so many in here, because so many of you are so far left. Likewise, someone like, say, even Al Franken, looks like a potential crazed liberal pipe-bomber to someone to the right of Froo — just as “dangerous” in perception, but in reality, not.
Coulter is no more dangerous than any other pundit. If some crazed wackjob (of any political persuasion) decides to go on a killing spree, it’s because they were predisposed to do so beforehand, not because of what someone said on the radio or TV.
You can disagree if you want, but I haven’t seen even the most liberal pundit saying the type of hateful vitriol that Ann spews. She almost literally says liberals eat babies.
You can’t be serious… Did you… Did you just take my exaggeration as something more than an exaggeration meant to simply my point so it would be more clear?
…
I guess I have to dumb it down even further.
I do not see zeal when used for negative affect as anything positive to admire. I do not admire zeal for zeal’s sake.
You have no idea how much contempt I have for your thickheadedness right now Xavier. I wasn’t saying that ball kicking or murder is admirable and if you think that, then you didn’t comprehend my words which just… Galls me and leaves me without any recourse than to ignore you going forward since you won’t understand what I am saying in the first place. I… I’m just going to stop.
*simplIFy
Heh, thanks.
Feel better now? The lack of vocabulary was particularly evident there. I’d recommend remedial English classes… relying on profanity is no way for a putative doctor to speak, or write, no matter how hag ridden by medieval superstitious nonsense he is….
LOL, I can’t argue with that glowing compliment.
Gah, BAD PK…
Was going to add that I am glad you clarified your point as a matter of perspective. You do have a very good point. We see things differently and I respect that about you. Don’t ever change… Much… >_>
I know that you odd…you’ve always been odd. (very loose rock song reference)