Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.
 

« Previous | Next »

Block party, January 20th.


Obama Pictures and McCain Pictures

Block party, January 20th. 300,000,000 invited. Be there.

(Barack Obama)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Mijan

ยป Recaption This

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 240 comments

  1. Trainwreck Chaser says:

    Are you using my money to pay for it?

  2. pittypat says:

    I, for one, welcome our new African American overlord.

    • Anony says:

      Yeah except hes not really African American. He’s mixed.

      • PortlandMark says:

        Yeah, I’ll say the same as I do about Tiger Woods: if either one was not famous, and was pulled over by a small town cop on a deserted country road, could their race become an issue? Since the answer is obviously “yes”, I say that makes them functionally black.

        Reminds me of an old Doonesbury cartoon. A black man is working as an aid to a wealthy republican senator. He’s pulled over while driving through her neighborhood to deliver some papers, and the police start to harass him. After trying to explain that he’s not breaking the law, he finally hangs his head and says “This is definitely because I’m black, isn’t it?”

        The police officer answers, “No, sir. Latinos are entitled to the same treatment.”

      • DRich says:

        Yup… a mix of African (Dad) and American (Mom)

  3. KaBooM says:

    Anyway you slice it, this was not funny. *sigh*

    • n8 says:

      Q: How many sad republican bastards does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
      A: That’s not funny. *sigh*

      • Delphi says:

        And here shows the “understanding”, and “acceptance” of the democrat party.

        • eddiepscetti says:

          It was a retort to KaBooM.. I know n8 doesn’t think of ME as a bastard and has actually been quite accepting and understanding of my viewpoint. It’s the nutjobs he has an issue with..

        • Seth says:

          Prove you are worthy of understanding and acceptance and maybe you will get it. Typical Republican, wants something they didn’t earn. Guess what, we aren’t required to respect or accept you. We are required to uphold the rights we all share. That is all we are required to do. You have free speech, you can complain. but we don’t have to listen to your whining.

          • ema says:

            “Typical Republican, wants something they didnโ€™t earn” – I don’t think that’s typical of Republicans, probably a lot of that on both sides of the street.

            • eddiepscetti says:

              ema, you have to admit some of us tend to buck the trend..

              • !kca says:

                on a philosophical note (wrong place?)…
                shouldn’t “rights we all share” (i.e. equal rights) be predicated on respect & acceptance of individuals as human beings?

                • n8 says:

                  That would depend on your philosophy. If you are a secular humanist, then yes, very much so. If you believe that your rights are granted by a deity, and that said deity grants rights differently to races, genders, etc., then perhaps not.

                  As for me, I tend toward secular humanism, since agnosticism doesn’t shed much light on the topic.

              • ema says:

                Well, I would say most of us, but I’m an optimist! ;)

            • n8 says:

              Yeah, the incidence of people wanting handouts seems to be randomly distributed among the political persuasions. The difference is that those of the Republican persuasion tend to loudly decry handouts, even while accepting them.

              • ema says:

                I think the Republican party is suffering from multiple personality disorder right now…

                  • ema says:

                    Really! I just can’t understand all the bail out stuff they’re doing, it’s not conservative, I don’t know what it is.

                    • rhorho says:

                      *slightly lifts head*
                      .
                      Socialism? Bail Out = Hand Out? Rich white guy insurance?

                    • n8 says:

                      It’s corporate welfare. Real Republicans used to rage against that sort of thing, but the current crop doesn’t seem to mind it too much. It’s a pity, that was something I respected about them. Corporate welfare is a pox, it directly contravenes the “invisible hand of the market”, keeping corporate darwinism at bay. Basically it keeps buggy-whip manufacturers in business. *shakes head ruefully*

                      • minerva146 says:

                        We used to enforce anti-trust laws.

                      • eddiepscetti says:

                        Which is why I’m a ‘Wobbling Down the Center ModRep’..

                      • ema says:

                        Trouble is, I think the Democrats will be about doing the exact same thing. There is no difference between the two anymore when it comes to these bailouts and they don’t seem to have any respect for the taxpayer anymore. Maybe Obama will have other ideas but judging from what Pelosi has been saying it will be more of the same.

                        • n8 says:

                          Perhaps if the Republican Party can successfully disentangle itself from the so-called “social conservatives” (aka fundamentalist whack-jobs), it can then get back to its fiscal-discipline roots and become a party worth considering again.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          I honestly think this last campaign, along with Bush’s policies may just be the thing that turns them back. God I hope so because I honestly get tired trying to defend some of the platforms.

                        • n8 says:

                          I give you serious props for trying, for what it’s worth. Real conservatives don’t have much of a party to call home right now, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t any good ideas buried under all the neo-con crap.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          That’s why some of us are roosting here. I don’t know why we can’t take the best of both sides, toss them together, and voila! A government that makes sense.

                        • rhorho says:

                          Not that I want to get all Kumbaya, but don’t worry. The Democrats were in your shoes a VERY short while ago, remember? We were all, “Where’s our d*mn cohesive message?”, “How come we can’t win big elections?”, et c. Nobody needs to waste any time worried about whether the GOP will survive: I’m not *that* lucky!

                        • pittypat says:

                          Someone’s LOL’ing, m’Lord!

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          and I happen to like Kumbaya and swaying and all that other smarmy stuff..

                        • Uncle Fester says:

                          “God I hope so because I honestly get tired trying to defend some of the platforms.”

                          Then don’t defend them. Simple as that.

                          Simply since you vote in a particular way means you like the *bulk* of the lies they pump out. It doesn’t mean you have to accept all the crap like it’s prime steak, nor do you have be silent on the subject. Object and object loudly. If you keep quiet, they’ll think you don’t mind, and if you pay lip service to something you don’t agree with, then you get all you deserve, you hypocrite.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          wow, that came out of left field..

                        • rhorho says:

                          I agree with Unc, except I think he should do “take backs” on the “you hypocrite” part. We’re all hypocrites, to a certain degree. I’m a hypocrite when it comes to keeping my job, for example.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          It’s not that I disagree, it was the hypocrite comment that I thought was wrong. I do voice my opinion not on the platform as whole, but on individual items that I either agree or disagree with. As I have mentioned in the past, I am a Moderate Republican (or as some would call me, a R.I.N.O.) But, I would hardly classify myself as a hypocrite.

                        • rhorho says:

                          It may have been the way you expressed it, but I got the impression that you were tired of defending planks with which you didn’t agree. I assume that Unc read it the same way I did.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          Ok, I think it’s probably the phrasing. When something is put forward by the Republicans that I don’t agree with, I will be one of the first to say so.

            • rhorho says:

              Good catch, ema. As soon as I saw “Typical Republican,” I thought “Oh, this always works out well!” *cringes*

            • Seth says:

              Sorry, I was being a little trollish there and reversing the usual canard you folks level against us, that we liberals are all welfare cheats who want something for nothing. I should have used a winky to show it was a joke.

          • fxquant says:

            AH but your incessant pissing and moaning for the past eight years was different?

            Get over it, your were poor losers in ‘00 and ‘04 and you are graceless winners in 2008. OB did NOT get 99.7% of the popular vote, the Democrats do not have 100 seats in the senate, etc. The attitude that all Democrats are fine upstanding citizens and all Republicans are theiving corrupt scum ain’t gonna help fix the mess the past two adminstrations, WJC and GWB both, foistes on the American public.

            • rhorho says:

              Broad brush FAIL

              • eddiepscetti says:

                Where the hell is Jane and her Big Stick of Logic when we need it? What a slacker!!

                • rhorho says:

                  No shidibitz! We are definitely suffering from the lack of her wisdom here. Call it our “Jane Addiction?”

                  • Jane St.Clair says:

                    I was at work losers! Some of us can’t do our jobs in a substandard way because we have access to PK on our computers. It happens to be blocked on mine! :) It was Friday movie day. I spent most of my time watching my students like a hawk to see who WASN’T moved by Hotel Rwanda and mentally marking them down as lost causes.

                    • rhorho says:

                      Where do you work, Dear? Darwin Elementary?

                      • Jane St.Clair says:

                        If only, these kids are so pampered they wouldn’t know true hardship if it bit them on the ass. That’s half the problem, they can’t even relate to a movie like that because it’s so out of their scope, they think it could never apply to them. Meanwhile in the next breath they’ll complain about the fact that they have to stay after the bell. I’m like, srsly? You just watched a movie about the genocide of nearly a million people and you’re telling me it’s an injustice that you have to stay two minutes after the bell for talking? I hate high school, I can’t wait until I’m back in Elementary where I belong. *sigh*

                        • rhorho says:

                          That would be a tough row to hoe! I can’t imagine how you hold up, facing all of those zombie-looking blank faces. You could probably make more of a difference with the younger ones. What state are you in? I’m in Texas, so our kids are just “learning the test,” and have been for years. (Bush implemented his program here before he was unleashed on the rest of the states, mind.) I have a ton of teacher friends, and even the righties are looking forward to a different plan for our schools!
                          .
                          I’m sorry for the upset yesterday. I come from a large military family. You’re smart, so you can guess the rest, surely. I get upset by *very* little, otherwise.

                        • THE JABBERWOCK says:

                          Beware the Jabberwock, my son:
                          the claws that catch, the jaws that snatch.
                          Beware the Jubjub bird
                          and shun the frumious Bandersnatch!

                        • Jane St.Clair says:

                          I wasn’t upset with you, I was attempting to joke, I thought the smiley explained that, but I guess I wasn’t clear enough. Sorry if you thought I was yelling at you, I would never! Well, I would, but you’d probably deserve it if I did. ;)

                        • rhorho says:

                          I was referring to the problem with GOM, but that’s old news.
                          …And yes, there’s no doubt in my mind that if you were yelling at me, I would truly deserve it! :D

                    • viking gal says:

                      Ooo. Good selection technique for the ‘little darlings’!

            • n8 says:

              You might notice that Obama didn’t have to bring in the Supreme Court to arbitrarily award him the victory, nor did he resort to smearing his opponent’s military service. You might, on reflection, admit that “we” had legitimate grievances, whereas “your” pissing and moaning reflects little more than an inability to get to grips with your own butthurt from the spanking Obama delivered.

              • eddiepscetti says:

                man, I hate when logic rules the day.. but yeah, as a ModRep, there was more butthurt over McCain’s choice of running mate rather then his loss to Obama.

                • Kuromisa says:

                  I can’t vote since I’m underage, but if I had been able to, Sarah Palin would have been the deciding factor in my choice. I thought either candidate would do a good job, but I do not want that woman anywhere near my national government.

                  No offense to anyone who likes her.

                  • rhorho says:

                    I think you’re in good company here! That said, I feel a little sorry for Sarah. President Bush provided a great head wind for Senator McCain. I don’t want to see the GOP blame the whole failure on her. (I totally reserve the right to make fun of her, though!)

            • Tessie says:

              “AH but your incessant pissing and moaning for the past eight years was different?”

              Um, yes.

              If and when Obama blatantly steals at least one and possibly two elections, ignores warnings so that an attack occurs on American soil, attacks a sovereign country for profit and/or spite, appoints his unqualified cronies, takes us from a fair-sized budget surplus to a huge deficit, strips away Constitutional rights, bungles the handling of a natural disaster and its aftermath, etc. etc. etc., I’ll piss and moan plenty about it, and I would hope everyone concerned for the well being of our country would speak up, too.

              As of this moment, he hasn’t done any of those things — in fact, he won’t even take the oath of office for another two months. Nobody has to LIKE the man if they’re not so inclined, but complaining about him at this point in time suggests sore loserdom, if only by process of elimination, since he hasn’t yet done anything but win an election.

              • comment cop says:

                “you people” who are you calling you people…sry, couldn’t resist. Back to all the political pissing and moaning (from both sides) ;)

              • Tessie says:

                “the elections were not stolen? I cannot count how many different independent organizations did recounts of their own after the 2000 election, and every one of them came out with the same result as the first one.”

                I’ve read many sources that seem to pretty definitively state that at least the 2000 election and probably the 2004 election were stolen. The votes were never counted accurately in 2000 (as has been exhaustively discussed elsewhere), and Diebold promised and delivered Ohio in 2004. You of course have the right to disagree; I will say, however, that the very fact that elections CAN be stolen is deeply disturbing to me.

                “Can we not just be happy that the guy is finally gone after Jan 20th, and good riddance?”

                I’m happy about that, but I don’t think it makes the last 8 years un-happen. My point in replying to the original poster was that Bush, as contrasted with Obama, has actually been in office and done things that were worth pissing and moaning about, and so the analogy was not a valid one.

                “If the Democrats had bothered to put up someone worth voting for in either of those elections”

                I’ll certainly grant that both Gore and Kerry ran generally half-assed campaigns, and that each made their fair share of mistakes. Whether or not they were worth voting for is a matter of opinion. My opinion is that just about anyone short of an axe murderer would have been worth voting for if it kept Bush out of the driver’s seat, and everything he has done or failed to do in the past 8 years has not only reinforced my opinion, but actually been worse than my worst fears.

                RE the “why can’t you just get over it?” issue, which I’ve heard and read many a time: up until two weeks ago, I think Jon Stewart expressed it best when he said, “How can we get over it? He’s still here!” Getting over a fair and square election that didn’t go my way is one thing, getting over a subversion of democracy is quite another.

                “I know that I simply am looking forward to being represented to the rest of the world, by someone (a) who can speak full sentences, (b) knows how to make those sentences up himself if need be, (c) doesnโ€™t piss off every other nation in the world with his arrogance, and (d) FFS, is the first goddamn black president in the history of the country!!!!”

                Agree wholeheartedly. Amen and hallelujah to that!! What’s FFS?

          • Xavier says:

            Wow, thank you for succinctly making the case for all of those pro Prop-8 folks…

      • eddiepscetti says:

        WOW! Turn your flame thrower down a little.. The assumption was made because ’round these parts, historically Republicans (and I am included in that category by the way) have made it a point to bitch and whine about the lols. Based on that, I can understand how n8 lept to that conclusion.
        -
        You on the other hand have made the incorrect assumption that n8 is a f*cking moron, a$$hole, or any other name you can toss about.
        -
        So, here’s one directed at you that you can include in your limited vocabulary – Wankstain; a person of such low intelligence that only a clump of dried dead sperm are a comparison.

      • n8 says:

        Wow! How could anyone NOT be swayed by such a well-reasoned and persuasive post? You can always spot a winner… just look for the profanity!

      • rhorho says:

        REVEAL: KaBooM is that annoying tv commercial guy who sells cleaning products. *covers ears*

      • minerva146 says:

        McCain and Obama want to get over the campaigh ugliness. Here’s to the spirit of unity! If only the sore-a$$ supporters would get over it and try to get along too. Nobody says we all have to agree all the time. Just being civil and having discussions is what the country is supposed to be all about.

        On one hand, those that were whipped into such a frenzy by the campaign are having a harder time letting go because some of their pundits continue to push the hate, in spite of their candidate asking for unity. They should be haranguing those who can’t get over their own agenda and push the division, but they stay all angry at us instead.

      • PortlandMark says:

        Stop! You’re KILLING me! LMAO

      • steve in Miami says:

        Republicans don’t screw in light bulbs. The screw in a twin bed. Every other Thursday night at 9:45 Pm in the missionary position.

        (Unless thay are in a bathroom in the Minneapolis airport that is)

  4. Amber says:

    I’d love to come! Thanks Barack :D

  5. Susan says:

    Don’t forget we’re also paying for the transition, etc. He’s keeping that $605M….

    January 20, 2009
    Beginning of an Error

  6. ladyrazzle says:

    I am bringing pie. NOBODY ELSE BRING PIE.

  7. Jocasta says:

    I wish I could go. I’m not about to buy a scalped ticket, though.

    • mothergoose says:

      Got three tickets from our State Rep (in Pa)…where are you, maybe I could get an extra…

      • Mijan says:

        I wish I could go, too. I volunteered on the campaign, and so did my mother and sister. I’m also an Army veteran who got out of the service last year. It would be nice… but I’ll watch it from home. :)

      • Jocasta says:

        Eee! I’m in Illinois (so yeah, I’m doubly proud), but I doubt I could get down that way anyway. So sad! Thanks, though. :D

  8. cobrajoe says:

    I love his anti-gravity tie.

  9. sally says:

    f*** yeah!

    (?)

  10. danyell says:

    At least we can all agree that he’s the most hip president we’ve ever had.

  11. Uncle Fester says:

    I travelled though DC airport on Inauguration night 2001… I’ve never been to a place that was so palpably miserable to be missing the biggest party night in 4 years…

  12. Frank says:

    It looks like Obama was Photoshopped into that picture.

  13. podgirl says:

    Please, for the sake of those of us who HAVE to live and work in and around DC, don’t come.
    I can’t even get out of my work parking garage right now because of some political mess that is tying up every lane of traffic on the NW side of the city. 7:30 p.m. on a Friday. I just want to go home! :-(

  14. Pirate77 says:

    I’ll pass. I’m sure I’ve got something much better going on.

    • Uncle Fester says:

      Peter Cook was once approched by an Member of Parliament he loathed who said to him ‘We must have dinner sometime’

      Cook replied ‘I sorry, but I’ll be watching television that night’ and walked away.

  15. Sorry, no party.
    The Washington Metro is in dept with a Belgian bank (KBC) and it will probably go bankrupt if it can’t pay back its loans.
    So that means no metro for you Merkians on 20/01/2009. Gotcha!

  16. foomanchu says:

    I don’t get the lol in this.. unless it’s the 300 million nbr. In actual fact, I think 58 million or so Americans voted for obama, and something like 52 million voted for Obama (just rough numbers)

    • foomanchu says:

      Err. 52 million or so for McCain

      • foomanchu says:

        I didn’t vote for either one. They are both too the same.

        Both want to continue war.

        Both were/are for the bailout (and stooges of the private corporation The Federal Reserve)

        Both are members of CFR.

        Both are for Big Govt

        I wonder how they stand on the NAFTA/The North American Union? (No press even seemed to get an that out as a question, let alone an answer.)

    • rhorho says:

      Yeah, those numbers are pretty rough. Obama won by 8.5 million popular votes.

  17. minerva146 says:

    What, no one complaining this photo is “shopped”? The original is floating around as a new one to be captioned still. This wasn’t taken in front of the white house OMG false advertising?

  18. AKS says:

    You had your 8 years and f’d it up royally. Get over it and just enjoy the ride.

  19. j-steen says:

    will ther be glowstickz?

  20. pb says:

    There aren’t words enough to express my disgust with this clown and donothing nobody.


Your comment

 

 

Search

Get Daily Lol News Emails


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Recent Comments

    Default User on GRAPE KOOL-AID
    Trollhunter on Ask Mitt Anything
    wickets ebil twin on GRAPE KOOL-AID
    mcolsen on GRAPE KOOL-AID
    mcolsen on GRAPE KOOL-AID
    wickets ebil twin on GOD HATES FAGS
    wickets ebil twin on GOD HATES FAGS
    theydbeshotinrussia on GOD HATES FAGS
    Irishdrunk on GOD HATES FAGS
    wickets ebil twin on Vladurday: Your attempt to cap…
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz