It has nothing to do with opposing views. It has to do with their unprofessionalism & hate mongering. I swear each one of them has to argue with whoever their guest is that has an opposing view to them. And then call their opposer crazy. It’s ridiculous.
Well, for me anyway. I can’t speak for anyone else hating Fox.
I have never seen another site as full of hate as this one- and all coming from the Liberals ! How do you people sleep at night? What a bunch of Trolls ! I’ll stick to kitties and leave you to you rself-righteous hate fest here.
Troll on !
Wow, you have absolutely no idea what goes on here, do you? While there are opposing views and the debates do get a bit heated, I don’t sense any hate. What I do know is that the majority of the regular posters here are passionate about what they believe in. Is that so bad? Does that make a person hate filled? As a registered Republican, I can honestly say that I have been shown some respect for what I believe in and not been accused of hating. Neither have I accused (at least not that I can remember) the other side of hating.
-
So yeah, go back to the kitteh’s where you don’t have to have a brain or an original thought.
I would have to say, the only hate I have noticed, is from the trolls…
The folks that show up, spout off at the mouth like they know something
then run away because they know if they had to defend their views, they’d
be buried in the mound of stupid that they brought in.
Us regulars would rather degenerate into a giant orgy than a hatefest…
I think most of us… actually…. LIKE each other…
Holy hell… did I just admit that out loud?
I LOVE YOU GUYS!
Wow everyone gets up in arms over this picture seriously it is the about the most mild of all…………..Plus it is right after all she is kind of a airhead.
I don’t like this woman or mccain but this just isn’t funny. It’s actually quite boring. Can we have some actuall lols. This is just going to turn into another whinge fest, theres nothing funny about it.
Ha! I love it! Not only is the woman dumb, but she’s dangerous… to her own campaign! According to McCain staffers she’s “a diva” and out of control. She’s already preparing for the loss next week, planning to use it to position herself as “party savior” for 2012.
Good luck with that, is all I can say. I’m going to enjoy watching her get shredded in -that- primary!
“I love the fact that you used this picture as a political springboard for your own biased views instead of commenting on the lol!”
My god! How DARE n8 do something so terrible, so inappropriate, so -unheard of-, because nobody has ever found a loophole excuse to espouse politics on this site, often to a completely unrelated lol…
True and having been around both genders growing up, it depends on the age range. Girls are more verbal on the average so they tend to whine more. Boys tend to fuss and brood. However, in the teen years both whine equally.
No kiddin’! Just look at her college transcripts! If she were so smart, she would have gone to an Ivy League college, then on to Law School. Idaho? Yeah, that’s a real clever bunch up there. A degree in Journalism? What is that – a degree for someone who likes to write, but couldn’t make it as an English major?
Nope – Journalism – One of the few really good careers for former beauty queens – all you need is a pretty face and they park you behind that desk… oh, it helps if you can read a teleprompter too..
I have a feeling we will be seeing a lot more of Palin on Fox News. Well, people who watch Fox News will be seeing a lot more of her. I hear she already has offers on the table.
I understand she went to school because she wanted to work @ ESPN. When she got out of school and applied, she discovered she would have to move to Massachusetts where the studios were and changed her mind. Imagine that: four years preparing for a dream, and never looked into what the job would actually entail. What, did she think they were going to send her video of games occurring and record her commentary for later broadcast?
“four years preparing for a dream, and never looked into what the job would actually entail”
..
What’s that tell you about her ‘preparations’ – or lack of – to be VP?
This is my right wing nuttery coming out here, but I honestly believe that she was having to hold herself back a lot in that interview to appear less right wing, and she came off sounding stupid. She wasn’t able to be honest, therefore she had to really think about what she was saying instead of giving gut answers, and she came off as fake and vapid. A VP can’t go against the party leader, and her being so much more right leaning than McCain forces her to hold back her natural conservativeness (is that even a word?). I think the same applies to Obama when he stutters during non-telepromtered speeches (especially at the beginning and all the way up until the first debate). He’s not being completely honest, so he has to think about the answers he gives in order to give the ‘right’ answer.
-
That’s a long way of saying that I think Sarah Palin knows good and well what newspapers she reads, but she had been told to keep her damn uber-conservative views caged up, and it forced her to act like an idiot. If she had been allowed to speak as she really thinks, she would come out as an uber-conservative, but at least she would come out as more honest and intelligent.
Politics aside, why insult the population of a whole state? Certainly you are not suggesting that all idiots have gathered in one state. If that were true, Idaho would have a much larger population.
Wow, just wow…any excuse eh? In case you hadn’t noticed, all the losers we have in congress got their degrees from those same Ivy League schools. These are the same people that have created the current mess we are in, and by people, I mean Democrats and Republicans.
Boo Kitty, that’s the worst logic ever. George W. Bush went to a freakin’ Ivy League School. I think it’d be safe to say you’re not about to ramble on concerning his utter brilliance.
If you think a straight C student got into an Ivy League school because of
his merits Froofrou… well Im not going to finish. You cant honestly say that
W. was Ivy League material.
Isn’t it kind of safe to say that you’re going to get people in the C to A range no matter what school you look at? Those are some damn hard schools, so I’d like to think that a C coming from an Ivy League school is something to be proud of.
Where was the talk of her ‘ineptness’ as Governor? Was there any? Is it only after she comes on to the Federal scene that a *maybe more family oriented, wholesome* picture of American values, scared the social liberals into a freenzy? Then this picture of a successful family woman (which I thought was desirable in progressives/feminism) all of a sudden is the antithema of it all? Maybe if she aborted that last child, she would be more respectable to our cultures eyes?
Just asking. Cuz it seems the charicature of her grew and snowballed way before a fair assessment could even gain ground.
Anyone else thought that?
signed,
just a wondering observation..
There was talk of her ineptness as Governer, but only in Alaska. Remember, Troopergate started way before she flounced onto the national stage. No liberals were ever scared by her, we knew America was not that crazy and our citizens would see right through her, which they did. The right wing has been drinking its own ‘all real Americans are conservative’ brand kool-aid, so they never realized how completely the real America would reject her.
Ineptness as governor? She had like a 90% approval rating. And it amazes me the speed at which the Troopergate thing came to a head. When exactly did the investigation start?
Except she’s not, is she? She’s only distributing the wealth to her kin and buddies up in her quaint little state without any consideration of who actually needs it.
As for doign what the left wants – oh, please, even if you take that one aspect of her views look at all the rest. Anti-Choice, thinks gays can be curesd scoffs at research backing evolution because she can’t or won’t understand it, stands opposed to seperation of church and state, why the hell would anyone on the left, centre or centre right of politics even give her the time of day?
I believe the deal about the oil profit checks was that it goes to every resident of Alaska. If she knows that many people personally, then we’ve got a different kind of politician on our hands. Otherwise, she’s just using the same type of thing that you guys are screaming about wanting from Obama.
-
As far as her policies, she’s a Reagan Republican, and that’s what they believe. Why is that so hard to take? She has a different belief system than you do, and even if she somehow did get to take over if McCain croaked his second day in, she’d never get to actually implement the policies she wants to implement because of the checks and balances of the system. Something that Obama WON’T have if he gets in, so he will basically have free reign until the Dems are voted out of the majority in Congress.
-
And I think you are grossly oversimplifying her views, but that’s your choice.
The profit from the oil is in the state Constitution because it says that the people own the public land and are to share in the profits made off of it. Maybe Palin helped to enforce it, but it was not her idea.
Then once again, why are we constantly slagging her for it? You guys are killing me here! She’s evil because she’s a socialist. She’s evil because she didn’t come up with it first. She’s evil because her daughter managed to do something stupid and get pregnant. *sigh*
I don’t think she’s evil. I do think that she’s naive to downright ignorant of some issues (esp. science), polarizing to a point where even the McCain and Palin camps are divided, and did mediocre to poorly in interviews and the debate.
What I mean is that she’s distributing it to people like her and used it cynically to increase her approval ratings rather than for the good of people who needed it. I can’t remember Regan being such a frothing religious extremist, but then maybe I was a bit young then.
As for “Why is that so hard to take?”
I know what her belief system is, I completely disagree with it. Why is that so hard for *you* to take? She’s a polarising and divisive character so a lot of people are going to have a lot of criticisms of her. Maybe you need to get over that.
From where I’m standing (admittedly a lot further right than you are), Obama is just as polarizing. As shown by poll numbers split exactly down the middle. Neither candidate has much to bring to the table aside from being able to whip the other side into a frothy mess trying to discredit everyone they don’t agree with.
At least Obama hasn’t been accusing large swathes of America as not being “Real America”. And if you look at humankind as a whole, Obama is no-where near polarising, with people and politicians from all parts of the world and all sections of the political spectrum favouring him over McCain and Palin. All 3 main parties in the UK seem to the “In the tank” for Obama from where I’m sitting.
I’m not looking at mankind as a whole simply because they can’t cast their ballots in a few days. It does no good to see what the rest of the world thinks of our president any more than we can look at who the new president of France is. We don’t have a say in that, so we can’t complain if he’s an idiot (I don’t know if he is, I’m just using an example). F’instance: I can’t bitch about the governor of, say, Indiana because I’m not from that state. Granted, the president is going to be dealing with countries all over the world, but that doesnt’ mean they should get a say in who they’re dealing with. It’s a like it or lump it proposition.
I think looking at who the President of France and any other country is is absolutely crucial, as is considering the standing of our own countries and their leaders on the world stage. Not caring about such things is exactly the kind of pig-ignorant insular thinking which has caused the US and the world so many problems in the past.
I can also say the President on the US is an idiot, whether or not I live there or not. The President of the United States is an idiot. There we go.
The irony is absolutely dripping if this comes from someone who supported Bush, who ran a policy of stomping around the world telling other countries and leaders what to do.
It’s simple Froufrou. If they are female and Democrat-that’s good. If they are female and Republican-obviously they are evil. If they have a rich heiress for a wife and are Democrat- that’s good. The same but Republican- that’s evil.
If they help the poor but are Republican- that’s evil. If a Dem does it-that’s good. Ad nauseum.
It’s called the hate filled hypocrisy of the Left and there is no limit to it.
Jesus Christ almighty, have you listened to yourself? Did you not see the mountains of sh*t that Kerry got over the Heinz stuff? Obama being painted as an evil socialist for his plans on helping the poor? Hillary being told that she wouldn’t be able to cope with the “Big mean boys” or Iran and Korea? You have the cheek to start accusing just the LEFT of hypocrisy?
The Republican campaign has been at another level of gutter politics this times round and they’re paying for it. Enjoy!
July 2008
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Public_Safety_Commissioner_dismissal#The_Political_Response_to_the_Dismissal_of_Public_Safety_Commissioner_Walter_Monegan
LOLOL who do you think makes up these numbers? You really think it’s real people that are actually surveyed on what they think of her? Whoever spews information like that just makes up whatever sounds good at the time, depending on who they want it to benefit.
Ok, so that’s the line we need to use when we’re looking at Bush’s approval ratings, Clinton’s approval ratings while he was governor, Pelosi’s approval ratings as Speaker……..It’s all a conspiracy based on who They want to look good. Got it.
She’s an exact mirror image of Bush in terms of intelligence, arrogance and views and policies which swing from the laughable to the obscene. Why on earth did you think voters outside of Neo-Con evangelicals would like her any moer than they liked Dubya? Just because she’s a woman? How very patronising.
She’s also not remotely a feminist. Feminists don’t spit on the achievements of the feminist women who came before them by using the advantages they gained as a result of those struggles to take away other’s women’s rights.
I don’t think a pregnant, underage daughter would generally be considered “wholesome”, certainly not by the religious types who try and dictate who is and isn’t morally wholesome.
It;s not as if the pregnant, underage daughter was put out in the cold. She was loved and accepted in spite of her faults, which is one of the main teachings of Christianity. Love the sinner, not the sin.
It’s not the response to the pregnancy, it’s that she got pregnant in the first place. Underage and not married. Find me any religious leader that would consider that wholesome.
Once again, it’s not the action that’s considered wholesome, because teenagers will be stupid. It’s the reaction to the stupidity that makes them wholeseome.
I’m neither. It just irritates me when people try to portray people as evil, or not Christian based on the actions of a free-will holding teenager. Sure, that family has its problems. But I think that may be part of the ‘grassroots appeal’ that everyone keeps touting because apparently the ‘perfect Palin family’ has its problems too. I don’t agree with teen pregnancy, but I also don’t think it negates her ideas on birth control and abstinance. Bristol is a perfect example of it not working all the time, just like birth control of any kind doesn’t work all the time.
And it irritates me when people have double standards and accept “immoral” acts because the “sinners” in question are on one side of the political fence, while they would have no problem bringing out the hell and brimstone bullshlt if said sinners were on the other side.
Proof that hippos are awesome:
–
“They call me the Hiphopopotamus
Flows that glow like phosphorous
Poppin’ off the top of this esophagus
I’m not a water-dwelling mammal
That moved to the metropolis
And learned to breakdance,
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis?
Did Steve tell you that?
Steve.
What kind of rapping name is Steve, anyway?”
–Flight of the Conchords
If you’ve never seen ‘Flight of the Conchords,’ you really need to check out their HBO special. They are simply New Zealand’s best digi-folk comedy band ever.
“In that same 2006 questionnaire, the soon-to-be governor said she would fund abstinence-only education programs in schools. “The explicit sex-ed programs,” she added, “will not find my support.”
The entire LA times article attached. Here is a quote: “No, I’m pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don’t have a problem with that. That doesn’t scare me, so it’s something I would support also.”
Are you trying to say that the quote in that article is fabricated? Because I can find you other sources other than the HP if you’d like. If Sarah Ppalin is saying that she will not support it through legislation and then allowing her daughter to have explicit sex education AND paying lip service to it later on then yes, I think she’s the worst kind of hypocrite. Did you post that piece of flip-flopping double-speak thinking that it actually made her look better or have you finally joined the winning team?
What the F are you talking about? Did you read the article I posted? She says in her own words she does not oppose the teaching of the use of contraception. What more do you want? See this is why I don’t go runing around all over the internet for proof for you guys! It’s never accepted anyway and it’s a waste of my time!
I’d like her to back it up! Saying one thing in the media and legislating another is not a virtue!
Have you actually read the whole of the article, which is seemingly written expressly to highlight the mixed messages and contradictory positions in the McCain/Palin ticket on this issue?
I think the missunderstanding comes from the fact that she supports teaching abstinence as a method of birth control IN ADDITION to condoms and other methods, they can be taught together.
*SIGH* Do I have to copy the entire article over here:
‘Palin wrote, “Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.”
But in August of that year, Palin was asked during a KTOO radio debate if “explicit” programs include those that discuss condoms. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms “relatively benign.”‘
What she calls “explicit” obviously does NOT include condoms.
The headline doesn’t make her look like an idiot, I don’t get that at all. But you already think she is an idiot, so it wouldn’t matter what the article said.
I think the real problem is that the US Department of Education, since the Bush Administration, has labeled any sex education beyond abstinence only as explicit sex education is the real problem. Palin’s idea of “explicit” is different than te definition that has been put forth by the USDoE.
correct. the issue is response to mistakes- not the mistake. We all make them, yes, even while striving for that *wholesome* standard of life.
I find more people villifying her/the daughter because people see this “hypocrisy” over this sex matter, but yet all these crooks on the public stage almost get the free pass.
The closest person I’ve seen as late for squeeky clean and consistent “wholesomeness” are Ron Paul and possibly the past Governor of New Mexico, chriminey, brian fart, I can’t think of his name… known for riding his bike for miles and picking up trash… for years…
And look what our sold out media whores did to limit Ron’s message and appeal to the people.
Good gods no, the majority of people who hold high levels of power have been corrupted by said power, some worse than others. That doesn’t excuse the religious right brushing Palin’s family problems under the table with a pat on the head when you know full well they’d be sitting on their high horses smug or screaming if if was Obama’s family instead.
I still haven’t seen any skits accusing Obama of having an incestual relationship with either of his daughters.
-
Media bias? Different treatment of the candidates? Nah.
Ok, so if we’re going with stereotypes here, what about a skit where Obama is a drug dealer who pimps out his young daughters and his wife while wearing a fur trimmed, floor length coat and a hat with a feather in it?
Especially since she wouldn’t *be* pregnant before marriage if Mother Palin would have just explained the importance of using proper contraceptives. THat whole “just don’t do it” thing hasn’t worked in 4000 years of recorded human history, why do people think we just need to try it for one more generation to get it right?
The teen pregnancy rate in Texas is ridiculous…
just read it is 1 evry 10 minutes.
yea Red States?
Sure, just keep pretending they won’t do it…
*head explodes*
Neither you nor I knows exactly what Sarah Palin told Bristol regarding
sex, contraception, and/or abstinence. Plenty of parents who have told
their kids “I’d rather you waited, but if you don’t, tell me and we’ll get you
on the pill” or “I’d rather you waited, but if you don’t, here’s a box of
condoms” have ended up with pregnant teenagers anyway.
A lot of people, possibly including Palin, think that sex is a matter that
should be discussed with kids at home rather than taught in schools
because of the emotional/moral/ethical issues that come along with the biological
issues involved. The fact that she’s advocated teaching abstinence in schools
doesn’t mean that she wouldn’t be more in-depth at home, or that she doesn’t
think other parents should be.
Personally I’m in favor of making sure they get all the biological
basics of reproduction, contraception, std’s, etc. at school just in case they
don’t learn it at home, but I don’t think that absolves parents from their
responsibility to discuss sex with their kids.
Why wait for her ineptness as governor. Lets go back to when she ran a city of four to six thousand that had never had a budget deficit. When she was done with the place, it was 22 million in the hole. Quite a bit for a tiny town. Yes, lets take her tactics national!
I swear, all of you who are getting seriously offended and defensive on a SATIRE site, should be punished by sitting through 983457694865 hours of political debates. No matter what party you claim, that kind of behavior makes you dirty Commies. *defeats own purpose by starting a fight with the ‘dirty Commies’ comment*
…..but if you hold Sarah Palin up to your ear and listen closely, you can hear the Bering Sea
Hmmmm. Obama just went to Hawaii and suddenly the Governor of Hawaii seals Obama’s birth certificate so no one can see it. Coincidence? Nor has Obama given a single open press conference since he spoke to “Joe the Plumber”. He’s running scared !
this morning i got into my car at 6:50am, turned on the radio, and heard a voice that sounded very much like that of obama. i thought surely this is an ad, but come to find out he was giving an interview to a local radio station (i’m in texas). i found this extraordinary, and wondered if mccain was going to be on next.
the dj’s actually lamented the fact that mccain had repeatedly denied their requests to have him on their show (5 minute interview, with caller questions added). minutes after this lamentation of not getting to interview the other side of the camp, a lady called in complaining the show was “slanted” and she would no longer listen because they only gave obama air time. apparently, she has selective hearing. her man just simply refused to show up.
interesting point: another woman called in who related that that interview pulled her over to the obama camp, because in a few short examples he described what he would *like* to do for normal, average, everyday people like her (she said she’s a middle class mother, wife, and high school government teacher), and it bothered her that all she heard was rhetoric, but no real explicit plan, from the mccain camp.
it was all very interesting, as well as, for the most part, refreshingly civil and rational.
If you can come up with captions that are clever or witty, I’m all for making fun of pretty much anyone, but if it just comes down to petty name-calling, it’s not worth the time to check out the blog – the cats ARE funnier (and so are the dogs.
I’m not a Palin fan, but that’s based on her policies and stance on issues. I think referring to her as dumb isn’t funny, but more importantly, it’s dangerous because she isn’t stupid, and putting her down as an airhead means you aren’t taking her seriously. Some people like her, they like what she appears to represent, and they will vote for the McCain/Palin ticket because of the Palin half – don’t misguide yourselves into thinking that because you disagree with her, or because she’s been uninformed in interviews, that she is dumb and therefore not a threat. She’s proven she’s a savvy politician and good at reading people…and those traits will take her far.
The LOL was amusing. Reminding me of the old joke – picture someone flapping their hands on each side of their head at a furious rate – an airhead refueling.
But, I get more amusement from the comments. Following the line of thought has been an interesting exercise in my efforts to stave off chemo-brain.
Oh, well if you want to go down that road.. what do you call a blonde with her hair died brown? Artificial Intelligence
-
My aplogies to all the blondes out there, I just couldn’t resist.
It has come to my attention that not all blonds are airheads and not all airheads are blonds. Read some of the comments you find here and on other blogs.
Ha-Ha! Am I first???? Good morning everyone
barble barle BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA garble garble COMMUNIST mumble mumble JOE BIN LADEN mabumabu TERRORIST CHURCH grumble grumble MAVERICK blublublu REVEREND WRIGHT grahgrah BILL AYERS blahblah ACORN blusdflkjs NIGG-
*foams at mouth*
Aww, it’s ok! It will all be over in a week.
FRUIT FLIES
So you watch Fox News too, huh? Jk, I hate Fox News.
Most Liberals hate opposing views.
Spoken like a true opposing view hating Rep.
It has nothing to do with opposing views. It has to do with their unprofessionalism & hate mongering. I swear each one of them has to argue with whoever their guest is that has an opposing view to them. And then call their opposer crazy. It’s ridiculous.
Well, for me anyway. I can’t speak for anyone else hating Fox.
I have never seen another site as full of hate as this one- and all coming from the Liberals ! How do you people sleep at night? What a bunch of Trolls ! I’ll stick to kitties and leave you to you rself-righteous hate fest here.
Troll on !
Troll ON!!!!
..
SET THE HOOK YOU FOOL!!!!!!
.. ok ok.. now let him run a bit…
Fishing… You know, I should get a fishing permit and go fishing sometime. Might even get the fish that ate one of my batteries.
Wow, you have absolutely no idea what goes on here, do you? While there are opposing views and the debates do get a bit heated, I don’t sense any hate. What I do know is that the majority of the regular posters here are passionate about what they believe in. Is that so bad? Does that make a person hate filled? As a registered Republican, I can honestly say that I have been shown some respect for what I believe in and not been accused of hating. Neither have I accused (at least not that I can remember) the other side of hating.
-
So yeah, go back to the kitteh’s where you don’t have to have a brain or an original thought.
I would have to say, the only hate I have noticed, is from the trolls…
The folks that show up, spout off at the mouth like they know something
then run away because they know if they had to defend their views, they’d
be buried in the mound of stupid that they brought in.
Us regulars would rather degenerate into a giant orgy than a hatefest…
I think most of us… actually…. LIKE each other…
Holy hell… did I just admit that out loud?
I LOVE YOU GUYS!
xxxxxxx
Xtasy – Stick to kitties, they’re cute, cuddly, easy to take care of. Us big boys with brains will handle the rest!
Wow everyone gets up in arms over this picture seriously it is the about the most mild of all…………..Plus it is right after all she is kind of a airhead.
acorn? i like acorns? teehee
Holy crap, I haven’t laughed this hard at a PK post since the Shiny Object one a few weeks ago. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
For those of you playing at home, Maverick!
Lame
Nice use of the advanced lolbuilder!!!
Seriously! this one is the best since “oooh shiny object” indeed.
kudos !!!!!
It’s not that funny. It’s just stating the obvious, really.
I don’t like this woman or mccain but this just isn’t funny. It’s actually quite boring. Can we have some actuall lols. This is just going to turn into another whinge fest, theres nothing funny about it.
Aww, but to the semi-lurkers like me, the whinge fests are the most entertaining!
QQ some more please, we all love to hear it.
QQ = ;_; ?
yeah, take that!
I make one funny and get ripped for lampooning Obama,
but it’s ok to belittle the other candidates…hmmm?
click my name or see: http://images.icanhascheezburger.com/completestore/2008/10/28/128696960653152342.jpg
Ha! I love it! Not only is the woman dumb, but she’s dangerous… to her own campaign! According to McCain staffers she’s “a diva” and out of control. She’s already preparing for the loss next week, planning to use it to position herself as “party savior” for 2012.
Good luck with that, is all I can say. I’m going to enjoy watching her get shredded in -that- primary!
Ha! I love the fact that you used this picture as a political springboard for your own biased views instead of commenting on the lol! Teehee!
This picture has no funny.
“I love the fact that you used this picture as a political springboard for your own biased views instead of commenting on the lol!”
My god! How DARE n8 do something so terrible, so inappropriate, so -unheard of-, because nobody has ever found a loophole excuse to espouse politics on this site, often to a completely unrelated lol…
No, wait–
What are you, new here or something? Tell ya what, why don’t you try refuting an argument instead of whining like a little girl?
(Careful with that “whining like a little girl” bit, n8. My kid sister beat the tar out of classmate for using a similarly dismissive line.)
Your sister is awesome.
In bed.
I did not have sexual relations with that sister…
You will be spared a yankee beatdown, then.
The same cannot be said of cobrajoe.
Alas poor cobrajoe, I knew him… Sorta.
And I wish I didnt..
I try to find middle ground so he and I talked picking up shooting clay pigeons. Best to make friends than enemies.
Ha! Fair warning, I guess.
I like it when women get rough!
but only if you’re wearing a gimp mask…
Yeah, little boys are definitely whinier. Especially when little girls hit them.
I’ve met some girls with a good punch but then again I’ve met the boys who they were scared of too.
Little kids are rotten in general…
Boys whine, too N8…How ’bout just say, “Whine like a child.”
How about “Stop whining like an emo”
Stop whining like a whiner?
Stop whining like a wiener?
Stop putting your wiener in my wine?
Would you like some cheese with that weiner?
Cheesy Weiners: live this Saturday night with special guests Revolting Cocks and Free Beer
21 and over
$5 @ the gate
.. it comes with cheese.
Ewwwwww.
My sentiments exactly.
*ears perk* did i hear my name called ???
*sprays Captain with a hose* WEINERS…. DONT…. TALK!
stop whining like a Maverick?
Stop whining like Seth ?
I don’t believe I have ever heard Seth whine, unlike you. Hey, didn’t we establish you as a sock puppet a few threads ago?
And a horrible mispelling.
Stop whining like Tom Cruise?
Scientologists will be at your door in 3, 2, 1…
As long as they’re below OT3 they’re easy to get rid of, just start chanting “Zenu” and they’ll have to run off to check their pneumonia implants..
Oddly enough, offering to tell them about the wonders of Celing Cat also works.
It is cause for *facepalm* that my anti-whining post has generated so much whining. Crimony!
True and having been around both genders growing up, it depends on the age range. Girls are more verbal on the average so they tend to whine more. Boys tend to fuss and brood. However, in the teen years both whine equally.
If you want vapid comments go back to lolcats or failblog.
LOL, It’s funny cause she’s so stupid.
No kiddin’! Just look at her college transcripts! If she were so smart, she would have gone to an Ivy League college, then on to Law School. Idaho? Yeah, that’s a real clever bunch up there. A degree in Journalism? What is that – a degree for someone who likes to write, but couldn’t make it as an English major?
Well, she’s not just another laywer…
she couldn’t be, she’d have to make some sense
Cobrajoe.. believe journalists should be running the country over lawyers… since….. uh… Well?
Nope – Journalism – One of the few really good careers for former beauty queens – all you need is a pretty face and they park you behind that desk… oh, it helps if you can read a teleprompter too..
I have a feeling we will be seeing a lot more of Palin on Fox News. Well, people who watch Fox News will be seeing a lot more of her. I hear she already has offers on the table.
Rumblings are she’s thinking of running for pres in 2012. Really, RNC? Surely you’re not that desperate.
You Betcha!
Like I said, I -really- want to see that primary! Mittens will tear her a new one!
A Hillary vs Palin election would be epic to watch. Both have charisma but I think Hillary wants it more. Palin seems to just be soaking up attention.
Diva.
President? Across the Atlantic, I shiver.
Which is where she will be once all this dust settles. The Sarah Palin Show is on the drawing board somewhere.
*shudders*
I understand she went to school because she wanted to work @ ESPN. When she got out of school and applied, she discovered she would have to move to Massachusetts where the studios were and changed her mind. Imagine that: four years preparing for a dream, and never looked into what the job would actually entail. What, did she think they were going to send her video of games occurring and record her commentary for later broadcast?
“four years preparing for a dream, and never looked into what the job would actually entail”
..
What’s that tell you about her ‘preparations’ – or lack of – to be VP?
A journalism major who couldn’t think of which newspapers she reads. Epic.
O_O… Before now, I hadn’t thought of that. Damn that is scary.
This is my right wing nuttery coming out here, but I honestly believe that she was having to hold herself back a lot in that interview to appear less right wing, and she came off sounding stupid. She wasn’t able to be honest, therefore she had to really think about what she was saying instead of giving gut answers, and she came off as fake and vapid. A VP can’t go against the party leader, and her being so much more right leaning than McCain forces her to hold back her natural conservativeness (is that even a word?). I think the same applies to Obama when he stutters during non-telepromtered speeches (especially at the beginning and all the way up until the first debate). He’s not being completely honest, so he has to think about the answers he gives in order to give the ‘right’ answer.
-
That’s a long way of saying that I think Sarah Palin knows good and well what newspapers she reads, but she had been told to keep her damn uber-conservative views caged up, and it forced her to act like an idiot. If she had been allowed to speak as she really thinks, she would come out as an uber-conservative, but at least she would come out as more honest and intelligent.
Politics aside, why insult the population of a whole state? Certainly you are not suggesting that all idiots have gathered in one state. If that were true, Idaho would have a much larger population.
This comment is a WIN.
Well, that would sure explain a lot about California.
Wow, just wow…any excuse eh? In case you hadn’t noticed, all the losers we have in congress got their degrees from those same Ivy League schools. These are the same people that have created the current mess we are in, and by people, I mean Democrats and Republicans.
Keep yapping lap dog, keep yapping.
PS…http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A37397-2000Mar18
Yes, we need more people who went to mediocre schools and got mediocre degrees.
Boo Kitty, that’s the worst logic ever. George W. Bush went to a freakin’ Ivy League School. I think it’d be safe to say you’re not about to ramble on concerning his utter brilliance.
Try thinking before you toss out insults.
LOL!! he only got in to an ivy league school bc of connections, surely not intelligence & merit, kthx.
Because that’s the ONLY way to get into an Ivy League school, don’tcha know *rolls eyes*
If you think a straight C student got into an Ivy League school because of
his merits Froofrou… well Im not going to finish. You cant honestly say that
W. was Ivy League material.
Curiosity…..didn’t Al Gore make pretty much the same grades?
They were. And at an Ivy League school no less! Guess it doesn’t take more than mediocre grades to get in or stay in
Isn’t it kind of safe to say that you’re going to get people in the C to A range no matter what school you look at? Those are some damn hard schools, so I’d like to think that a C coming from an Ivy League school is something to be proud of.
I think this is hilarious.
Flame on.
CAR!!
..
..
..
K, Flame on!
excellent reference, party on
The picture isn’t complete without the spew of her word salad.
Mmmmm word salad… although I think hers is more of a regurgitated word salad really.
i don’t get it….
… then I’m guessing your real name is Sarah Palin.
Gutted!
I can’t see this picture.
I’m at school & have nicked the teacher’s computer which blocks EVERYTHING humourous.
Stinking P.C. censorship…..
And now I laugh at you. HAHA.
I laugh at you because I am being paid to stay on at school. *laughs*
Hey, the other day during a “study” period I learned to play poker….
Is it wrong of me that I really want to stick my dick in her holes?
Aural sex! you pervert!
Sorry… Still can’t hear you.
Must be the sound of a brain fart.
Where was the talk of her ‘ineptness’ as Governor? Was there any? Is it only after she comes on to the Federal scene that a *maybe more family oriented, wholesome* picture of American values, scared the social liberals into a freenzy? Then this picture of a successful family woman (which I thought was desirable in progressives/feminism) all of a sudden is the antithema of it all? Maybe if she aborted that last child, she would be more respectable to our cultures eyes?
Just asking. Cuz it seems the charicature of her grew and snowballed way before a fair assessment could even gain ground.
Anyone else thought that?
signed,
just a wondering observation..
There was talk of her ineptness as Governer, but only in Alaska. Remember, Troopergate started way before she flounced onto the national stage. No liberals were ever scared by her, we knew America was not that crazy and our citizens would see right through her, which they did. The right wing has been drinking its own ‘all real Americans are conservative’ brand kool-aid, so they never realized how completely the real America would reject her.
Ineptness as governor? She had like a 90% approval rating. And it amazes me the speed at which the Troopergate thing came to a head. When exactly did the investigation start?
“She had like a 90% approval rating.”
Because she bribed the Alaskan citizens with her socialist wealth spreading programme.
I thought that was a good thing.
I thought it was a bad thing?
The point being that there is always wealth distribution. The only difference is who it’s distributed to.
SO why exactly are we debating the evils of Palin if she’s just doing what the left wants anyway?
Except she’s not, is she? She’s only distributing the wealth to her kin and buddies up in her quaint little state without any consideration of who actually needs it.
As for doign what the left wants – oh, please, even if you take that one aspect of her views look at all the rest. Anti-Choice, thinks gays can be curesd scoffs at research backing evolution because she can’t or won’t understand it, stands opposed to seperation of church and state, why the hell would anyone on the left, centre or centre right of politics even give her the time of day?
I believe the deal about the oil profit checks was that it goes to every resident of Alaska. If she knows that many people personally, then we’ve got a different kind of politician on our hands. Otherwise, she’s just using the same type of thing that you guys are screaming about wanting from Obama.
-
As far as her policies, she’s a Reagan Republican, and that’s what they believe. Why is that so hard to take? She has a different belief system than you do, and even if she somehow did get to take over if McCain croaked his second day in, she’d never get to actually implement the policies she wants to implement because of the checks and balances of the system. Something that Obama WON’T have if he gets in, so he will basically have free reign until the Dems are voted out of the majority in Congress.
-
And I think you are grossly oversimplifying her views, but that’s your choice.
The profit from the oil is in the state Constitution because it says that the people own the public land and are to share in the profits made off of it. Maybe Palin helped to enforce it, but it was not her idea.
Then once again, why are we constantly slagging her for it? You guys are killing me here! She’s evil because she’s a socialist. She’s evil because she didn’t come up with it first. She’s evil because her daughter managed to do something stupid and get pregnant. *sigh*
I don’t think she’s evil. I do think that she’s naive to downright ignorant of some issues (esp. science), polarizing to a point where even the McCain and Palin camps are divided, and did mediocre to poorly in interviews and the debate.
Nope, she is just evil, no other clarification is needed.
And because you can’t back up anything you say in the slightest, you’re an idiot (@Stone5150)
What I mean is that she’s distributing it to people like her and used it cynically to increase her approval ratings rather than for the good of people who needed it. I can’t remember Regan being such a frothing religious extremist, but then maybe I was a bit young then.
As for “Why is that so hard to take?”
I know what her belief system is, I completely disagree with it. Why is that so hard for *you* to take? She’s a polarising and divisive character so a lot of people are going to have a lot of criticisms of her. Maybe you need to get over that.
From where I’m standing (admittedly a lot further right than you are), Obama is just as polarizing. As shown by poll numbers split exactly down the middle. Neither candidate has much to bring to the table aside from being able to whip the other side into a frothy mess trying to discredit everyone they don’t agree with.
At least Obama hasn’t been accusing large swathes of America as not being “Real America”. And if you look at humankind as a whole, Obama is no-where near polarising, with people and politicians from all parts of the world and all sections of the political spectrum favouring him over McCain and Palin. All 3 main parties in the UK seem to the “In the tank” for Obama from where I’m sitting.
No- he just staed that they cling to their guns and bibles in desperation.
Pretty polarizing to me.
I’m not looking at mankind as a whole simply because they can’t cast their ballots in a few days. It does no good to see what the rest of the world thinks of our president any more than we can look at who the new president of France is. We don’t have a say in that, so we can’t complain if he’s an idiot (I don’t know if he is, I’m just using an example). F’instance: I can’t bitch about the governor of, say, Indiana because I’m not from that state. Granted, the president is going to be dealing with countries all over the world, but that doesnt’ mean they should get a say in who they’re dealing with. It’s a like it or lump it proposition.
@ Ceefax: PK ate my post. It was a really good reply, so give it a second to show up
I’ll take your word for it – that’s me told
As for Palin only being as polarising as Obama, she’s even divisive in her own party, never mind the country at large.
I think looking at who the President of France and any other country is is absolutely crucial, as is considering the standing of our own countries and their leaders on the world stage. Not caring about such things is exactly the kind of pig-ignorant insular thinking which has caused the US and the world so many problems in the past.
I can also say the President on the US is an idiot, whether or not I live there or not. The President of the United States is an idiot. There we go.
The irony is absolutely dripping if this comes from someone who supported Bush, who ran a policy of stomping around the world telling other countries and leaders what to do.
It’s simple Froufrou. If they are female and Democrat-that’s good. If they are female and Republican-obviously they are evil. If they have a rich heiress for a wife and are Democrat- that’s good. The same but Republican- that’s evil.
If they help the poor but are Republican- that’s evil. If a Dem does it-that’s good. Ad nauseum.
It’s called the hate filled hypocrisy of the Left and there is no limit to it.
Jesus Christ almighty, have you listened to yourself? Did you not see the mountains of sh*t that Kerry got over the Heinz stuff? Obama being painted as an evil socialist for his plans on helping the poor? Hillary being told that she wouldn’t be able to cope with the “Big mean boys” or Iran and Korea? You have the cheek to start accusing just the LEFT of hypocrisy?
The Republican campaign has been at another level of gutter politics this times round and they’re paying for it. Enjoy!
And the left hasn’t?
Nope, the most dispicable tactics have come from the right without any shred of a doubt.
Nice argument, accuse others of what you are doing so that when they confront you on you own BS it seems ‘Fair and Balanced’
“And I think you are grossly oversimplifying her views, but thatโs your choice.”
can’t help it; her views are gross & simple.
I think they had that program already.
She massively increased their cheques.
July 2008
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_Public_Safety_Commissioner_dismissal#The_Political_Response_to_the_Dismissal_of_Public_Safety_Commissioner_Walter_Monegan
“She had like a 90% approval rating.”
LOLOL who do you think makes up these numbers? You really think it’s real people that are actually surveyed on what they think of her? Whoever spews information like that just makes up whatever sounds good at the time, depending on who they want it to benefit.
Ok, so that’s the line we need to use when we’re looking at Bush’s approval ratings, Clinton’s approval ratings while he was governor, Pelosi’s approval ratings as Speaker……..It’s all a conspiracy based on who They want to look good. Got it.
95% of the time people do just invent statistics to bolster their claims.
It’s true!
That’s over half the time!!!
“There are three kinds of lies- Lies, Damn Lies and statistics”
unknown?
Isn’t that a Mark Twain quote?
78.71% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
That’s a damn lie!
She’s an exact mirror image of Bush in terms of intelligence, arrogance and views and policies which swing from the laughable to the obscene. Why on earth did you think voters outside of Neo-Con evangelicals would like her any moer than they liked Dubya? Just because she’s a woman? How very patronising.
She’s also not remotely a feminist. Feminists don’t spit on the achievements of the feminist women who came before them by using the advantages they gained as a result of those struggles to take away other’s women’s rights.
I don’t think a pregnant, underage daughter would generally be considered “wholesome”, certainly not by the religious types who try and dictate who is and isn’t morally wholesome.
It;s not as if the pregnant, underage daughter was put out in the cold. She was loved and accepted in spite of her faults, which is one of the main teachings of Christianity. Love the sinner, not the sin.
It’s not the response to the pregnancy, it’s that she got pregnant in the first place. Underage and not married. Find me any religious leader that would consider that wholesome.
Once again, it’s not the action that’s considered wholesome, because teenagers will be stupid. It’s the reaction to the stupidity that makes them wholeseome.
I can’t tell if you just don’t understand what I’m saying or if you’re trying to move the goalposts.
I’m neither. It just irritates me when people try to portray people as evil, or not Christian based on the actions of a free-will holding teenager. Sure, that family has its problems. But I think that may be part of the ‘grassroots appeal’ that everyone keeps touting because apparently the ‘perfect Palin family’ has its problems too. I don’t agree with teen pregnancy, but I also don’t think it negates her ideas on birth control and abstinance. Bristol is a perfect example of it not working all the time, just like birth control of any kind doesn’t work all the time.
And it irritates me when people have double standards and accept “immoral” acts because the “sinners” in question are on one side of the political fence, while they would have no problem bringing out the hell and brimstone bullshlt if said sinners were on the other side.
You and I are in agreement about that. I hate hipocrisy in all its forms.
Hippos are awesome though.
Proof that hippos are awesome:
–
“They call me the Hiphopopotamus
Flows that glow like phosphorous
Poppin’ off the top of this esophagus
I’m not a water-dwelling mammal
That moved to the metropolis
And learned to breakdance,
Where did you get that preposterous hypothesis?
Did Steve tell you that?
Steve.
What kind of rapping name is Steve, anyway?”
–Flight of the Conchords
But is is really a hippopotamus, or just a really cool opotamus?
is IT .. IT dammit.
Says you hippie!!!
If you’ve never seen ‘Flight of the Conchords,’ you really need to check out their HBO special. They are simply New Zealand’s best digi-folk comedy band ever.
Abstinance only education doesn’t work full stop, it’s a childish and naive approach to the problem.
Bristol didn’t have abstinance only eduction.
Then her mother is a hypocrite.
No, she doesn’t believe in abstinence only education, that is a myth.
What, someone forged her handwriting?
“In that same 2006 questionnaire, the soon-to-be governor said she would fund abstinence-only education programs in schools. “The explicit sex-ed programs,” she added, “will not find my support.”
The entire LA times article attached. Here is a quote: “No, I’m pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don’t have a problem with that. That doesn’t scare me, so it’s something I would support also.”
You may need to read something other than Huffington…
Are you trying to say that the quote in that article is fabricated? Because I can find you other sources other than the HP if you’d like. If Sarah Ppalin is saying that she will not support it through legislation and then allowing her daughter to have explicit sex education AND paying lip service to it later on then yes, I think she’s the worst kind of hypocrite. Did you post that piece of flip-flopping double-speak thinking that it actually made her look better or have you finally joined the winning team?
What the F are you talking about? Did you read the article I posted? She says in her own words she does not oppose the teaching of the use of contraception. What more do you want? See this is why I don’t go runing around all over the internet for proof for you guys! It’s never accepted anyway and it’s a waste of my time!
I’d like her to back it up! Saying one thing in the media and legislating another is not a virtue!
Have you actually read the whole of the article, which is seemingly written expressly to highlight the mixed messages and contradictory positions in the McCain/Palin ticket on this issue?
I think the missunderstanding comes from the fact that she supports teaching abstinence as a method of birth control IN ADDITION to condoms and other methods, they can be taught together.
oh so she doesn’t oppose the teaching of contraceptive usage but she will only FUND abstinence only education? talk about counterproductive..
*SIGH* Do I have to copy the entire article over here:
‘Palin wrote, “Yes, the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support.”
But in August of that year, Palin was asked during a KTOO radio debate if “explicit” programs include those that discuss condoms. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms “relatively benign.”‘
What she calls “explicit” obviously does NOT include condoms.
“Do I have to copy the entire article over here”
You obviously won’t, because the article you cited makes her look like an absolute idiot.
Of course you have already decided that.
The headline of the article might have given you a cluel
The headline doesn’t make her look like an idiot, I don’t get that at all. But you already think she is an idiot, so it wouldn’t matter what the article said.
I think the real problem is that the US Department of Education, since the Bush Administration, has labeled any sex education beyond abstinence only as explicit sex education is the real problem. Palin’s idea of “explicit” is different than te definition that has been put forth by the USDoE.
If she were poor and black, it would a terrible tragedy and failure of everyone involved, because she is white and rich, it is a blessed event.
correct. the issue is response to mistakes- not the mistake. We all make them, yes, even while striving for that *wholesome* standard of life.
I find more people villifying her/the daughter because people see this “hypocrisy” over this sex matter, but yet all these crooks on the public stage almost get the free pass.
The closest person I’ve seen as late for squeeky clean and consistent “wholesomeness” are Ron Paul and possibly the past Governor of New Mexico, chriminey, brian fart, I can’t think of his name… known for riding his bike for miles and picking up trash… for years…
And look what our sold out media whores did to limit Ron’s message and appeal to the people.
Good gods no, the majority of people who hold high levels of power have been corrupted by said power, some worse than others. That doesn’t excuse the religious right brushing Palin’s family problems under the table with a pat on the head when you know full well they’d be sitting on their high horses smug or screaming if if was Obama’s family instead.
I still haven’t seen any skits accusing Obama of having an incestual relationship with either of his daughters.
-
Media bias? Different treatment of the candidates? Nah.
Alaska is known for incest and rape. Wouldn’t make as much sense.
Ok, so if we’re going with stereotypes here, what about a skit where Obama is a drug dealer who pimps out his young daughters and his wife while wearing a fur trimmed, floor length coat and a hat with a feather in it?
Especially since she wouldn’t *be* pregnant before marriage if Mother Palin would have just explained the importance of using proper contraceptives. THat whole “just don’t do it” thing hasn’t worked in 4000 years of recorded human history, why do people think we just need to try it for one more generation to get it right?
The teen pregnancy rate in Texas is ridiculous…

just read it is 1 evry 10 minutes.
yea Red States?
Sure, just keep pretending they won’t do it…
*head explodes*
(mumble something about dinosaurs…)
Because it’s mostly the illegal aliens they are counting.
Good thing they aren’t counting all your sockies, huh?
Neither you nor I knows exactly what Sarah Palin told Bristol regarding
sex, contraception, and/or abstinence. Plenty of parents who have told
their kids “I’d rather you waited, but if you don’t, tell me and we’ll get you
on the pill” or “I’d rather you waited, but if you don’t, here’s a box of
condoms” have ended up with pregnant teenagers anyway.
palin approves of abstinence ONLY so you KNOW that’s ALL she’s ever said to her daughter.
A lot of people, possibly including Palin, think that sex is a matter that
should be discussed with kids at home rather than taught in schools
because of the emotional/moral/ethical issues that come along with the biological
issues involved. The fact that she’s advocated teaching abstinence in schools
doesn’t mean that she wouldn’t be more in-depth at home, or that she doesn’t
think other parents should be.
Personally I’m in favor of making sure they get all the biological
basics of reproduction, contraception, std’s, etc. at school just in case they
don’t learn it at home, but I don’t think that absolves parents from their
responsibility to discuss sex with their kids.
Because you have lived in her house for the entire time she’s had children and know this for a fact, right? Grow up.
I’d rather you didn’t, but if you do
– just don’t get pregnant…;)mommy’s career will suffer.. and better you than mommy’s career
…mmkay?
Why wait for her ineptness as governor. Lets go back to when she ran a city of four to six thousand that had never had a budget deficit. When she was done with the place, it was 22 million in the hole. Quite a bit for a tiny town. Yes, lets take her tactics national!
That sucking sound you hear… for once, is NOT our jobs going south!!!
If all our jobs are going south, why are they all coming up here?
i know, right
I swear, all of you who are getting seriously offended and defensive on a SATIRE site, should be punished by sitting through 983457694865 hours of political debates. No matter what party you claim, that kind of behavior makes you dirty Commies. *defeats own purpose by starting a fight with the ‘dirty Commies’ comment*
…..but if you hold Sarah Palin up to your ear and listen closely, you can hear the Bering Sea
I don’t think you understand that your idea is a reward to some of these people.
You are either on the inside here or you have no idea what the hell is going.
Go back to the first lol on PK, work yourself from there and you’ll see where we lost hope of straight up satire site.
Not only did I hear the Bering Sea, I saw a camel between her legs the other night. She should wear looser clothes.
Hmmmm. Obama just went to Hawaii and suddenly the Governor of Hawaii seals Obama’s birth certificate so no one can see it. Coincidence? Nor has Obama given a single open press conference since he spoke to “Joe the Plumber”. He’s running scared !
Comfortable lead in most major polls + estimated 350 electoral votes and 96% probability of winning at fivethirtyeight = running scared?
You learn well, grasshopper. Wax on, wax off.
first post ever, had to say something…
this morning i got into my car at 6:50am, turned on the radio, and heard a voice that sounded very much like that of obama. i thought surely this is an ad, but come to find out he was giving an interview to a local radio station (i’m in texas). i found this extraordinary, and wondered if mccain was going to be on next.
the dj’s actually lamented the fact that mccain had repeatedly denied their requests to have him on their show (5 minute interview, with caller questions added). minutes after this lamentation of not getting to interview the other side of the camp, a lady called in complaining the show was “slanted” and she would no longer listen because they only gave obama air time. apparently, she has selective hearing. her man just simply refused to show up.
interesting point: another woman called in who related that that interview pulled her over to the obama camp, because in a few short examples he described what he would *like* to do for normal, average, everyday people like her (she said she’s a middle class mother, wife, and high school government teacher), and it bothered her that all she heard was rhetoric, but no real explicit plan, from the mccain camp.
it was all very interesting, as well as, for the most part, refreshingly civil and rational.
Wow…..creative.
If you can come up with captions that are clever or witty, I’m all for making fun of pretty much anyone, but if it just comes down to petty name-calling, it’s not worth the time to check out the blog – the cats ARE funnier (and so are the dogs.
I’m not a Palin fan, but that’s based on her policies and stance on issues. I think referring to her as dumb isn’t funny, but more importantly, it’s dangerous because she isn’t stupid, and putting her down as an airhead means you aren’t taking her seriously. Some people like her, they like what she appears to represent, and they will vote for the McCain/Palin ticket because of the Palin half – don’t misguide yourselves into thinking that because you disagree with her, or because she’s been uninformed in interviews, that she is dumb and therefore not a threat. She’s proven she’s a savvy politician and good at reading people…and those traits will take her far.
*reads the comments* Today we learn that stereotypes exist for a reason: THEY ARE ALL TRUE.
you read ALL of them?
The LOL was amusing. Reminding me of the old joke – picture someone flapping their hands on each side of their head at a furious rate – an airhead refueling.
But, I get more amusement from the comments. Following the line of thought has been an interesting exercise in my efforts to stave off chemo-brain.
Oh, well if you want to go down that road.. what do you call a blonde with her hair died brown? Artificial Intelligence
-
My aplogies to all the blondes out there, I just couldn’t resist.
It has come to my attention that not all blonds are airheads and not all airheads are blonds. Read some of the comments you find here and on other blogs.
No really? Damn, there goes MY perceptions all to hell.. I do realize what you say is true, I was just making a joke.. m’kay?
ok ok