He just made another
He just made another dumb face, didn’t he?
(Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
Show Only: Captions | Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous was this the “folksiness” | This is totally going up on my MySpace Page! Next »
Add this to your blog:
» 102 comments
-
Recent Comments
dissimilitude on AFRICA shortright; founding… on Watch Out Terrorists… jklinders on Interrupting Kanye: I’m … shortright; founding… on Watch Out Terrorists… Shaks on AFRICA Shaks on At Least They Won’t Be… murky 2.0 on Watch Out Terrorists… Shaks on Watch Out Terrorists… Dontmonkeyk on Ministry of Silly Walks: Aztec… Dontmonkeyk on Will There Even Be A Next… 
Cheezburger Network Blog
How on earth did this make it to the main page?
I tend to wonder the same thing.
I mean… seriously!?
o.o This one’s…lame…to say the least…
yeah, I found plenty of funnier things.
Yet it has a 3.5/5. C’mon people, don’t just click the fifth Abe-head! It’s not asking how awesome of a president he was!
why can’t we add a fail option once they are on the front page?
Seconded.
Very lame. Mine LOlz have been way better.
Everybody’s LOLz have been better, except this one! I odn’t blame the person for not putting their name to it.
what’s weird is we all complain, yet for whatever reason, this reaches the home page.
There are a lot of lurkers, I suppose…
I voted the hell out of it.
I noticed… *shotguns*
But, mine was dumber!
It’s quite apparent that only democrats make the “lolz”, or atleast only theirs makes it to the main page.
I get so sick of this song. Now it’s stuck in my head, thanks a lot.
It’s called a democratic option, in other words, the people vote. I know that conservatives hate it when everyone has an equal say, but that is what America is all about.
Hah ! It’s the Dems that don’t want anyone to have a say- just like this site !
And yet, here you are, having your say. Look, there’s a difference between us saying, “You can’t talk here,” and saying, “Anytime you say something stupid, we will refute it and mock you mercilessly.” The first is attempting to limit free speech. The second is exercising free speech.
–
Letting you have your say and agreeing with your ideas are two different things.
Still a failure to understand democratic process. Let me explain: There are more people here supporting Obama than McCain this year. Therefore you will see more people expressing viewpoints that don’t agree with yours. This is because the overall feelings of the American People agree more with Obama at this point in history. Your views are in a minority in general. AS Seth Says, you still have your angry say, but don’t expect it to be 50/50 because that’s just not the mood of the people. We know you’re against the fairness doctrine, so you really wouldn’t want to go against majority rules and falsely put in more Right-wing viewpoints than was actually represented, right?
Um, er, seeing as there is just the Democratic symbol on the upper left of the PK page and no elephant and an ad for “Yet another Bush we can’t trust”, I don’t think it’s too far of a throw to say that this is a Democrat biased site which would tend to lure more Democrats than Republicans. I’m not sayin’ nothin’ but I’m sayin’.
Not a democratic symbol. Look closer. The Donkey has a trunk on it’s back leg. They have the symbols combined. The elephant is there.
How do you spell Bob backwards, megabob?
Then if its an “option” why do you have to lie and sugar coat your positions to get people to vote for your candidate? Why do you only run the candidates that act like they are the smartest person in the room when they are just preaching the same class warfare BS that weve had coming from them for 60 years? Do you even know your party’s principles? Do you even have principles? Why cant your candidates just come clean and say what they want to do? Oh yeah because no one would elect them if they came right out and said “im going to raise everyone’s taxes, screw up the military by cutting it in half, enact legislation to “protect the environment” when we dont know if anything we do can truly affect the planet, and cap it all off with massive spending increases”. No your “option” isnt much of an option unless it sweet talks americans into voting for it with smooth words and a nice face.
“candidates that act like they are the smartest person in the room ”
-Sorry if intelligence intimidates you, but since when is intelligence a liability? When did being average become the ideal? This mentality is what is holding America back amongst the world’s best thinkers, scientists, etc.
“Why cant your candidates just come clean and say what they want to do?”
-See Blueprint for Change on Obama’s website. he has details on many, many issues on just what he wants to do.
“when we dont know if anything we do can truly affect the planet,”
-Science is pretty united on the fact that people contribute to global warming. You should read more. Even the Bush Administration is going along with the reality of this now.
“sweet talks americans into voting for it with smooth words and a nice face.”
-You are too closed minded to even see past his face. If you actually paid attention to his true message instead of what right-wing talkers tell you he says, you might be surprised.
I’m about to oust both of your arguments. Ready?
You’re both gay. Dexter Morgan for president!
~Finis
Come on minerva, don’t you know that politicians should be appealing to Joe Six Pack with average intelligence? If politicians aren’t getting down with the masses at NASCAR rallies then they’re elitist scum. We don’t want smart people running the govt, do we?
He didn’t say he didn’t like the candidates acting like they were smart. He said, acting smart WHILE preaching etc. etc. rest of annoying sentence.
I don’t agree, but please just keep in mind he didn’t just say acting smart, there were more implications.
Taking phrases out of context, that sounds like the McCain campaign =(
NO, I took that phrase because it’s the same rhetoric the right wingers always say about Obama being educated and therefore an elitist. Maybe it wasn’t worded the same, but the meaning was still there.
Cue right wing lol conspiracy rant in 3…2…1…
-
Yes, yes for the love of God we censor the lols on this site to further our leftist commie views, can we ever get to the point where we don’t feel the need to have this debate on EVERY SINGLE THREAD? It was a stupid lol. I thought it was stupid, you thought it was stupid, we all thought it was stupid but somehow it’s here, mock it and move on.
There does seem to be a preponderance of left leaning lolz, and the right leaning ones are curiously absent…
see my above post. It’s because we have a democracy and more people are on the obama side of the ticket this year.
Be nice, Barack. He can’t help how he looks.
It means he’s a RACIST !!!!!OMG !!!!!
Racist OMG…Does that mean
R — adical
A — nti-
C — hrist
I — is
S — taging
T — errorist
O — rganizations
M — imicking
american G — reatness
holy crisis, MegabOB…the terrorists are coming, the terrorists are coming… save the wimmen, save the EP’s!! HALP!!!!
. . .
Just say no to crack !
It’s not racism that concerns me. Socialism or communism are of far greater concern to me.
What? Hating someone on account of their race is not as big a concern to you as something that *in theory* could create the perfect society?
Thank you for that insight.
I don’t think anyone is really concerned with the theories of socialism/communism at the moment. I mean, we all know it’s a nice idea. Or at least I think we all know that.
But I think he’s just saying, he’s not opposed to Obama because he’s black, but because he’s supposedly socialist.
Which by the way, LOL.
No, Obama is “socialest”. See previous LOL.
I love mavrik, how bout u
wait… he’s opposed to Obama not because he’s black, but because he’s supposedly socialist.
sorry
Ah, that explains it somewhat.
Also in reply to your by the way: In. Freaking. Deed.
PK has become remarkably less funny the last two weeks. Can’t wait till the freakin’ election is over and lolz will be funny instead of partisan. Gah…
i’m retty sure they’ll continue to be partisan because one half of the people will be pissed after the election
but hopefully, partisan or not, they’ll at least get funnier then this piece of crap…
Face it. Libs want to take your money, take your land, take your liberties, take your freedom, etc etc etc…and what do you get in return? Not even a funny.
Just for the lolz – which freedoms?
Freedom to spend your own money rather than have them spend it for you. Wait a minute! That happens no matter who is in office!
Why is punditkitchen not partisan??? All they show is 99% left jokes and 1% for the right??? or a least be 50/50 with the jokes.LOL
McCain cant make any faces his face doesnt move since it was broken several times by his captors. Maybe the jackass who wrote this “lol” should go spend a few years in a POW camp and see if he thinks this BS is still funny.
Sir, hold on. the Waaaaaaaaahmbulance is on its way.
Wut? McCain made that awful gagging face at the end of the last debate when he was trying to shake hands with the host. I almost feel sorry for the old fart.
He always seems to be making that gagging face. Odd.
Maybe it’s a manifestation of his disgust at his own campaign.
Maybe Obama farted…
Come to think of it, why do almost half of the US voting public want McCain to be commander in chief of the US military? He got caught!
(note: I stole this joke off an Australian comedian, who probably stole it off an American one.)
That’s my gig, bloke!
Probably got caught because his legs were broken? Sorry, I don’t really think this ‘joke’ was that funny.
The truth is often unimportant in comedy.
Not entirely true.. that isn’t comedy but making fun of someone’s handicap. It would be different if he was that way intentionally.
To be honest, McCain did graduate at almost the bottom of his class at the naval Academy and has crashed five planes. He wasn’t that good of a soldier. I don’t knock what he did for letting some of the other guys go home first, but all in all probably not commander material.
The fact that he graduated at the bottom of his class is certainly open for ridicule. I just have an issue making fun of someone because of a handicap.
Ok, I’m with you on not making fun of a disability. I didn’t get that out of the post. I think they just meant he wasn’t commander material based on his military record.
Had he been Obama, affirmative action would have put him at the top of his class!
BTW, where are Obama’s school records? They still haven’t been released ?
He graduated Magna Cum Laude and was head of the Harvard Law review. They don’t let just any chump do that. Also, Obama left race blank on his application to Harvard Law because he wanted to get in on merit.
You know the purpose of Mjolnir is to smite trolls, right, Min?
I guess I’ll have to get with the hammering more often. Their skulls are too thick to be penetrated by logic alone.
I almost got into a bar fight in Brisbane, Australia when someone called me a Canuck and wouldn’t believe that i was really a yank. Had a lot of fun that night…i think…those aussies can down the piss.
Probably got caught because his legs were broken? Sorry, I don’t really think this ‘joke’ was that funny.
Yes, mocking McCain’s funny faces means you hate all ex-P.O.W.’s!
No, sir, I watched Rambo and I think ex-P.O.W.’s are totally awesome.
RAMBO FOR PRESIDENT.
He’s too old
It’s funny. Yes, it is.
Personally, I feel like McCain’s faces are nothing compared to both Bush’s and Hillary’s. God did not bless them with good photo opportunities…
what a stoopid n1gg3r
Ok, who has the beating rod? DWM? Minerva? Guinny? Ema? n8? Jane? Charlie? Anyone want to help me hold this idiot down and give them a good thrashing?
Let me use my Hammer.. (it has lightning)
unsurprising form somebody who uses a name resembling Hannity. lol
Easy now, I kind of like Hannity. He’s less vitreolic than, say, O’Reilly
Still has a lot of hate, that one.
See, you say he has hate, I say he’s passionate. I think Jon Stewart and (crap, drew a blank) the other comedien (not Colbert) have their own brand of hatred, but it’s wrapped in a prettier bow.
(the other comedien to whom I refer wrote the book ‘Lying Liars….”)
Al Franken for Senate! That is a good book. It’s satire, so you take it with a grain of salt. On the parts where he’s trying to document things, he provides many references. It’s not made up.
Hannity lies to further his agenda. He’s been doing it for years.
HANNITY: “You’re not listening, Susan. You’ve got to learn something. He had weapons of mass destruction. He promised to disclose them. And he didn’t do it. You would have let him go free; we decided to hold him accountable.” (4/13/04)
FACT: Hannity’s assertion comes more than six months after Bush Administration weapons inspector David Kay testified his inspection team had “not uncovered evidence that Iraq undertook significant post-1998 steps to actually build nuclear weapons or produce fissile material” and had not discovered any chemical or biological weapons. (Bush Administration Weapons Inspector David Kay, 10/2/03)
HANNITY: “Colin Powell just had a great piece that he had in the paper today. He was there [in Iraq]. He said things couldn’t have been better.” (9/19/03)
FACT: “Iraq has come very far, but serious problems remain, starting with security. American commanders and troops told me of the many threats they face–from leftover loyalists who want to return Iraq to the dark days of Saddam, from criminals who were set loose on Iraqi society when Saddam emptied the jails and, increasingly, from outside terrorists who have come to Iraq to open a new front in their campaign against the civilized world.” (Colin Powell, 9/19/03)
HANNITY: “And in northern Iraq today, this very day, al Qaeda is operating camps there, and they are attacking the Kurds in the north, and this has been well-documented and well chronicled. Now, if you’re going to go after al Qaeda in every aspect, and obviously they have the support of Saddam, or we’re not.” (12/9/02)
FACT: David Kay was on the ground for months investigating the activities of Hussein’s regime. He concluded “But we simply did not find any evidence of extensive links with Al Qaeda, or for that matter any real links at all.” He called a speech where Cheney made the claim there was a link “evidence free.” (Boston Globe, 6/16/04)
HANNITY: “[After 9-11], liberal Democrats at first showed little interest in the investigation of the roots of this massive intelligence failure…[Bush and his team] made it clear that determining the causes of America’s security failures and finding and remedying its weak points would be central to their mission.” (Let Freedom Ring, by Sean Hannity)
TRUTH: Bush Opposed the creation of a special commission to probe the causes of 9/11 for over a year. On 5/23/02 CBS News Reported “President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11.” Bush didn’t relent to pressure to create a commission, mostly from those Hannity would consider “liberal” until September 2002. (CBS News, 5/23/02)
Where did you get your source material? Curious……
And like I’ve said in other posts, I think both sides are using the same arguments (or parts of the same arguments) merely twisted into what they want them to say. Clinton said there were WMDs in Iraq while he was in office, they had to go somewhere. I think that both sides are taking stuff out of context, making it fit their own world view. I just like listening to Hannity and Rush because of their fire and passion, and to my ears Al Franken sounds like a bitter old Liberal. It’s an opinion
I have my days when I think Rush goes over the edge a bit. And my days when NPR sounds like it’s whining for its momma. It’s a mood thing, I guess.
Many people said Saddam had WMDs but the Bush administration seemed rather focused on going far beyond that with their claims.
According to them:
Saddam could have a nuke in 6 months or has them right now.
Had advanced unmanned aerial vehicles which could deliver bio weapons to its neighbors and the US.
Could only use the aluminum tubes for nukes.
Iraq could attack us in 45 minutes.
Saddam was behind 9/11.
5 years after the 2nd Iraq war, I was having a conversation with a friend. She, very seriously, told me this:
“I watched this programme last night and, seemingly, some people are saying that the Iraq war was *dramatic pause* illegal!”
Ah, really?
She’s sweet…
It’s a progressive site, but they cite the quotes. When I did my search I was careful to stay away form hannityisamoron.com
Here’s another one where he lies to discredit Ron Paul.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2007/060907_hannity_lies.htm
I figure if we all do something, then none of us will go down, a la Oriental Express.
I’ll try not to use too much lightning damage then, as it would clearly implicate myself.
I cast Magic missile at… the Darnityness?
You know I was just thinking that. I recalled you taking it several threads ago
Well, he truly deserved it at that pint. It was the only humane thing to do.
*hands rod* Here ya go love.
Ha! You forgot me.. I have a most excellent beating rod..
That’s what she said
Oh! You heard about that?!?!
Over and over and over and over again
Ya this is lame, I,m going to FAIL blog. Mmm… FAIL blog, you always make me feel warm & fuzzy.
Obama wants pen0r in his mouth
*nod head, sip coffee* Yes, Senator Obama, he did!