Abolish
Abolish the Bill of Rights
Who is that in the picture? Tell us in the Comments
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
Show Only: News | Democrats | Republicans | Media
« Previous Good George | I’m John McCain… Next »
» 117 Comments
Get Daily Lol News Emails
RSS Lol News Feed
-
Recent Comments
Squiggly on What a relief you’re… Lefty on What a relief you’re… Igor the Vigorous on This one Igor the Vigorous on HYPOCRISY Igor the Vigorous on HYPOCRISY gmc360 on HYPOCRISY gmc360 on HYPOCRISY Igor the Vigorous on HYPOCRISY gmc360 on HYPOCRISY Igor the Vigorous on HYPOCRISY
And thankfully no one is there to sign them.
And thankfully no one is there to sign them.
Only because B. Hussein Obama hasn’t won.
l o l f a g
The good news is that even Rove, everyone’s favorite Republican Kingmaker, accepts that if the election was held today Obama would win (and with the market the way it is it sure isn’t going to get better for McCain). So we can all take amusement that when B. Hussein Bin Laden Ayatolla Hitler Antichrist Microsoft Obama wins Naqamel will shit a brick composed of severe intolerant anger.
Um, fail. His name actually IS B.HUSSEIN OBAMA. I can haz phonics?
You see, people? THIS is why first cousins shouldn’t be allowed to marry.
You fail at an intelligent response.
Obama Youth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAkc03uHmeU
Obama Youth 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt6JWzBqLWs
Obama.
Fascism We Can Believe In.
Regurgitated idiocy win.
You seem to forget about all the other groups who do the same thing with children. Children are the future, all groups both negative and positive are going to pass on their agendas to the youth to keep the message going.
I also find it amusing that the second video is obviously just a black youth group taking a positive stance on their lives and crediting a black man who has a major chance at becoming president. I recall the same thing happening with other black leaders in the past. Hell, the same thing is happening among girls because of Hilary and Palin. God forbid the youth be positive about their futures these days (though I think they should credit someone for their merits, not because of race or color).
Remember folks, anyone with an agenda will twist anything they can get their hands on against someone they hate. Our own government isn’t innocent of that. Stick to looking at real news, not internet people, and even with real news, get several sources and form your own opinion. No one tells the truth anymore.
*race or sex, not race or color.
I’m sure Hitler said the same about the Hitler Youth .
As much of a monstrosity Hitler was, he did quite a bit of good also. It doesn’t make anything better for the horrible horrible things, but people will follow those who will make them feel good- look at the times now for god’s sakes!
Amen to last statement. Along with ‘radical activist judges’ (which is
bullspeak for renegade violators of oath taken under penalty of perjury,
always a felony in California) who make up their own laws as the go
along, police who “enhance and fortify” their affadavits and cases (see
parentheses above) to get their own way, legislators who pass laws
protecting criminals from prosecution if they are committing a crime
that benefits the police agenda (legal or otherwise, and to support that
I include a reference to California Penal Code 148.5 subsection e which
prohibits prosecution of an acknowledged and intentional crime by
persons who are legally mandated to report actual known or suspected
abuse) such as obtaining unlawful search warrants. I call this law the
skeleton key act, permitting access otherwise prohibited by law to a
persons private papers (in this case computer documents).
This election is way off base, with a notable lack of any positive
plans or constructive suggestions to real problems on the McCain
side.
Sorry, but he did not win the war in Viet Nam. His main experience
in that war was surrendering to the enemy and being captive for
five years. Anyone ever see the movie “Manchurian Candidate”?
To tout that ‘heroic endeavor’ as experience in how to end a war -
well, I guess surrender IS one way to end a war, and he HAS had
experience…
I don’t care what color, race etc. a candidate is. Is the man going
to do his honest best to do the best job for the greatest number
without ripping the protections from the individual?
The UN charter states that the basic unit of society is the family.
More bullspeak for ‘fascistic socialism is good’.
Anybody with two living brain cells that still communicate on good
terms knows that the individual is the basic unit of humanity, ie
society comprised thereof. Amen.
Soldiers are dying in foriegn lands, the lonliest kind of death, put there
on a ‘go follow orders or go to prison’ basis. Anyone who has been
in the military knows that.
they are allegedly protecting our rights under the Constitution and law -
while the politicians and ‘radical judges’ and ‘proactive police’ are
taking them away from us.
Go figure.
Maybe – on a slightly different note – if the US gov was not so dependent
on the fuel taxes collected on gas and diesel at the pumps, maybe
alternative fuels (think moonshine wars) which would be harder to
tax effectively – would have a chance.
God help us all, especially if we cannot get it together to help ourselves.
Amen to that too.
Goodnight Gracie.
Its better than future reincarnations of t-pain, souljaboy, lil
wayne and every other fucked-up, sellout, minstrel looking for a
quick buck. its pretty damn weird, but this is more common to the
strong traditions of black fraternities stepping shows centered on a
spoken word piece. the quick comparisons to hitler youth is a far
reach and a desperate comparison to obama’s so called socialist ideas.
i dont care about obama or mccain, because the two party system is
what’s fucking us over.
Whoa whoa…. wait a minute…. did you just form you political outlook from
videos on freaking YOUTUBE?!
I…..
I…
I..
I.
Screw it… ’nuff said.
Watch Jesus camp and tell me again you’re afraid of the left.
They might be chanting and marching, but did you look to see what they’re chanting? Obama is giving them hope to become the next architect,
engineer, lawyer. You can’t blame a politicians supporters for what they do on their own. Now, if Obama decided he needing a personal chorus of cute schoolchildren singing about how great he is everywhere he goes, or if we are presented a national song to sing about him in front of a flag, then I might be worried.
Wait, why am I arguing on the internet? This is basically pointless. Sorry.
video 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CgvgjfwyPs
video 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwBK31tC5QM
There is a difference between debating and arguing. Personally, I think (mature)debate should be encouraged more frequently on the internet. Oh, and hopefully they are TRUTHFUL and respectful debates… I’m asking for too much, aren’t I?
sorry, but… did you use mature and internet in the same sentence? And not pause for major LOLs? While I agree that it SHOULD happen, it’s one of those things that SHOULD happen, but then again, there’s a lot that SHOULD happen…
Ultimate showdown!
I’ll be glad to render an intelligent response just as soon as you raise an argument that merits one. In the meantime I’ll be satisfied to mock you and your unbranching family tree.
You ever see the scary movie “Jesus Camp”?
lol democrats
lol bipartisan system
true that
Socialism looking better and better…
Really? Seems to me that government interaction is what caused all this. I mean, Freddy and Fanny were both government institutions designed to socialize the banking industry. Not directly, of course. But a government owned company that does nothing but buy mortgages? Helloooooo. “Oh hello, bank. You want me to buy that sub-prime mortgage off of you? Okay. No. Don’t worry. We’re so big that the government will have to bail us out if things go bad. Here’s your money. Have a nice day!” Socialism fail. This and FDR’s other brain child social security are going to go down as the biggest mistakes of the last century. Capitalism works great when the government keeps its nose out of it.
Boris history and economics knowledge FAIL.
Actual counter argument FAIL.
I know! We could create socialist institutions within a capitalism and then conclude that socialism is a bad thing when they fail for some reason.
Are you serious? It was major GOVERNMENTAL DEREGULATION of the housing industry that cause this whole mess. When companies are left to do whatever they want, nothing but bad things happen in the end (Enron, S & L). Fanny and Freddy were giving out loans willy-nilly and nobody in he govt. was paying much attention. When everyone realized what happened and decided to call in the loans…oops, no money to be had! Now that the govt. wants to step in and take measures, everyone wants to cry “foul”. If they had been looking out for the long term effects of the bad business practices they let happen, it wouldn’t have come to this. It may have taken them the better part of 60 years to figure out how to run their country without a riot every other month, but China’s economy is a helluva lot stronger than ours right now.
Socialist Party USA has your vote?
Like I said…looking better and better.
The government has a long tradition of privatizing the benefits and socializing the risk. The commoner loses every thing in a Ponzi scheme backed by the government and the CEO of the corporation gets millions of dollars and then the taxpayer has to pay to fix the problem. Anyone involved in the Savings and Loan crisis should be in jail to this day (John McCain) and anyone involved in the Enron scandal should have had a felony conviction, all assets “nationalized” and been forbidden from public office (Dick Cheney).
How quickly they forget…
So why aren’t we frog marching the guys who are at the heart of this financial crisis down the the local slammer like they did with Ken Lay and Enron? Hmmmmmm???????? Be that John McCain or not (he warned this was coming many years ago), they all need to be perp walked. But guess who all that would take down……….
Impeach ‘em all. Let God sort ‘em out.
lol, I actually agree with that.
Why is it that the guys that are supposed to be working for us…. arent able to be fired by the people they’re working for? Thats always perplexed me.
It’s what they call ‘market correction’ Capitalism has been allowed to run away with itself and people have realised it doesn’t ’self regulate’ if you take it to extremes, so the only way to fix it is to flirt with socialism. Thems the breaks, have fun.
This isn’t Capitalism. This is some bastard form of sociocapitalism that doesn’t need to exist anymore than ManBearPig
it’d be funnier if “separation” was spelled right.
And multiple.
But we’re a society that praises mediocrity and not falling on your face now apparently, so let’s just praise the image poster for using the correct version of “you’re”!
No it wouldn’t!
It’d be even funnier if they’d get their facts right.
What do you mean by that, Mr. Fox News Viewer?
pwnt
Not
I think he means it would be funnier if it wasn’t full of libtard idiocy following their messiah blindly into change and hope and stuff
What does this have to do with a Messiah? Or hope? Or change? Or anything that has been painted liberal at all. Last time I checked, both major parties enjoy the Bill of Rights. Both major parties respect the Constitution in that is has a system of checks and balances. And both major parties are for getting the actual terrorists and not throwing the term around.
Ah.
1. The Bill of Rights is still in effect.
2. The U.S. is not a Police State. If you see martial law enacted anywhere, let me know.
3. There’s technically no such thing as an “illegal war” since all states don’t have to answer to each other. The US also never signed the Geneva Convention, but we follow it (for the most part) anyways.
4. There is no bill called the “If You Don’t Like It You’re a Terrorist Act.” Which exactly is being referred to?
Don’t confuse the poor Liberals with facts ! They pull their hair out and call you a Poopy head and make fun of your children !
ROFL.
TTTBF! (Too true to be funny.)
i think they were referring to the Patriot Act
and i’ll be changing my name to Capt. Obvious soon
That was my first thought, but I figured I’d wait and see…even so, the USA PATRIOT Act doesn’t change us being spied on. We’ve been allowing Canada to do that for awhile now, as well as scanning anything international with ECHELON.
And Besides the spying thing, it’s basically the same as the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798…it’s nothing new.
You mean besides the attempts at circumventing the Fourth and Ninth Amendments? Isn’t that like saying that apart from the landing the 1928 voyage of the Hidenberg went smoothly?
The Bush Administration has had nothing to do with promoting illegal search and seizure.
As to the suspension of Habeas Corpus, I’ll just quote Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution:
“The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.”
9/11 was an invasion of public safety, something I assume you’ll agree with (or did you feel safe?)
As I said before, the USA PATRIOT Act only brought out what we’d been doing for awhile anyways.
Can the 9th Amendment even really be uprooted? All it says is we’ve got some rights that aren’t listed.
Just one thing, Jack:
9/11 was neither a rebellion nor an invasion.
Right. It was an unprovoked terrorist attack designed to kill as many innocent civilians as possible and take out major targets in the US in order to damage morale. I say turn it into a parking lot. Maybe with a Wal-Mart. Burkhas at half price!
A mass attack on American soil isn’t either an invasion or rebellion? What other options are there?
Dictonary.com shows “Invade” to mean
“to enter and affect injuriously or destructively, as disease.
to intrude upon.
to penetrate; spread into or over”
Just because they got past our security doesn’t mean they didn’t invade.
Dictionary.com is not an accepted source for legal definitions. Did terrorists attack? Yes. Did they invade? No. Invasion, by the legal definition, menas an attack with intent to occupy and displace the existing systems of governance. The attack was intended to kill civilians and damage morale, but it was never intended to occupy. Hence the attack was not an invasion; hence your citation of Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution is not applicable.
Oklahoma City was an invasion of public safety too-carried off by an american, even.
Frankly, and I say this with a straight face, I feel as safe now as I did before 9/11. Well, from terrorists… from the government… not so much (thanks Patriot Act)
3. The war in Iraq is almost as illegal as a war can be. The US asked the UN to approve it, they said no. US went in anyway. UN went in after them.
The US did sign and ratify the four Geneva Conventions, just not the three protocols written in the last 50 years.
(click name for more)
As I said before, there’s no such thing as an illegal war. The UN has no jurisdiction to actually enforce what it says. It’s a big pact of countries, but as has been shown time and time again, they can’t actually do anything when someone doesn’t comply. No nation is governed by anything higher, regardless of what we’d like to think, so nothing a nation does as a whole can actually be illegal.
The UN enforces what it says through the International Criminal Court (which the US doesn’t support in any way, and through trade embargoes and other actions.
Of course, the UN can only be as powerful as the nations willing to support its actions, which is probably why you believe that it has no jurisdiction whatsoever.
(new link under name)
I personally see the ICC as a kangaroo court. I can see it’s use for things such as trying a ruler who tortured/killed his own people; although I also believe it’s better suited to try those people in their own country if possible.
The UN was never designed to govern over countries; it’s original purpose was to stop wars from happening through open communication. Just because the UN doesn’t see it fit to send in their troops as well means the war is “illegal,” they try to keep their people to peace efforts; especially considering they get the sloppy seconds of NATO and have trouble holding their own against some guys with AKs and RPGs. Even in the UN-sanctioned Korean War, over 90% of troops were US; asking permission is more of a formality than anything.
But I think it is a formality that must be adhered to.
The way I see it, one of the worst things about the US is its unilateralism. Multilateral diplomacy is the most powerful way on Earth to ensure peace.
There is no way to ensure peace. People will always have differences, and we are naturally a violent being. Just because we can talk to each other doesn’t mean we’ll all get along happily. Even if countries stop warring with each other (incredibly unlikely), there will still be violence within countries. The UN was a good idea, but when the Vietnam war starts because the China representative was out of the room when it was voted upon…or when no country is actually willing to enforce anything the UN does (how many times have inspectors been booted out of N. Korea and Iran? What’s been done about it?), there needs to be a huge restructuring of it from the ground up before I feel we should give them any merit.
Also, your link is broken….not sure why you’re linking through the Red Cross for treaties anyways.
It was supposed to be a link to a pdf saying what countries had ratified what parts of the Geneva convention and related conventions.
Perhaps this link will work better.
Yeah, that works. Thanks
The US was party to the 17 resolutions against Saddam’s regime, as were all other members of the Security Council. The penalty for noncompliance was use of military force by the international community. Saddam did not comply. A *coalition* of nations invaded with the aim of removing Saddam as dictator. A smaller coalition (others having been intimidated by the very people who were supposed to have been displaced) remains to provide a civil infrastructure.
Neither is it an occupation. If it were so, we and other coalition members would be running the government, the courts, the police, the schools, etc. We are not; we are simply providing security until the Iraqis are self sufficient in this regard.
1. The Bill of Rights is still in effect.
Except for the fourth amendment. And, my gun loving friends argue, the second.
2. The U.S. is not a Police State. If you see martial law enacted anywhere, let me know
Ask the liberal activists in Minnesota who were harassed by the police if they agree.
3. There’s technically no such thing as an “illegal war” since all states don’t have to answer to each other. The US also never signed the Geneva Convention, but we follow it (for the most part) anyways.
UN Charter baby! We started it, and now that it pinches *our* expansionist goals, we whine about it.
4. There is no bill called the “If You Don’t Like It You’re a Terrorist Act.” Which exactly is being referred to?
USA Patriot Act includes vague language that makes it a crime to speak out against the USA Patriot Act. (Well, in theory, anyway. I admit I don’t expect to see it used against me personally.)
1. The U.S. Constitution states that all treaties the U.S. has signed are law.
2. The U.S. signed the U.N. Charter and the U.N. Treaty.
3. The U.N. Charter specifies that no signatory nation may declare war without U.N. approval.
4. The U.N. did not approve Bush’s plan to go to war in Iraq.
Therefore the war in Iraq is illegal. QED.
All y’all see my post above.
…yet it’s the U.N. Security Council that determines whether a country has been non-compliant, not the U.S. The UNSC did not make that determination before the U.S. invaded.
Pathetic-attempt-at-an-insult-fail, Mr. L. If you need a step ladder to stick your nose in because it’s waaaay over your head you should just keep quiet.
I find it sad to see people actually getting pleasure from saying people fail over teh interwebs.
Facts? There are FACTS? Ohhoho, I doubt that matey….
Looks like just another day on George Bush’s agenda to me.
Thank God that clown is outta here soon.
counting the days
They’re just waiting for Obama to sign them…
Clever *and* original.
No, wait–
How did you find out my agenda !!!!!!
We didn’t have to. It’s the same agenda the Democratic Party has had since 1972.
Win.
win-fail
Fail detection fail, half-name win.
wail and fin
FISSION MAILED.
And I actually voted for that poor SOB. It took me about 10 more years to wake up.
“Anyone under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart. Anyone over 30 who is not a conservative has no brain.” -Unk.
I have a heart, i just keep it in the freezer.
Ok, this lol is really not at all funny. Just kinda scary and depressing. And people who are saying this is Obama’s agenda are full of FAIL. Undermining the bill of rights and seperation of powers, starting wars, and saying anyone who disagrees with them supports terrorists is the Bush administration’s track record.
Where was the Bill of Rights undermined? (DC v. Heller upheld the second amendment, AFAIK, none of the others were an issue) Where are sources saying that they claim anyone opposing them are terrorists?
Clinton started a war as well, along with aiding in others…No one seems to object that we still operate in Kuwait or Bosnia.
As to undermining separation of powers, last I checked, Congress is in Democratic rule, and the Supreme Court is an inherently apolitical institution. Seems fairly balanced to me.
Common sense EPIC WIN.
See I hestitated to even post, because I think it’s a waste of time to argue with somepeople on here. The U.S.A Patriot act is a violation of so many of our rights, giving the FBI permission to eavesdrop on phone calls with no warrent etc is a gross violation of our rights.
People on the right saying saying anyone who opposes the Iraq war or talking about pulling on are damaging the troops morale and aiding terrorists has happened, and it’s insane. Bush said it himself “you’re with us or you’re against us”, not something a global leader should say in my opinion.
As a matter of fact, I DID oppose Clinton’s wars, and am not pleased that we’re sitll in Bosnia and Kuwait. I protested our bombing of Kosovo back inthe 90s, so don’t go assuming things about people you don’t even know.
Bush has pushed throughout his years in office to get conservative judges onto the bench, and the act he got congress to sign in the wake of september 11th gave him the power to send the military wherever he wants, do whatever he wants, without reporting to congress. Unconstitutional, only congress is allowed to decalre war. Of course, congress is just as guilty in that respect. I haven’t excluded congress from fault in the mess we’re in now.
I never said we were a police state, I said things have been undermined, and the fact that it’s not obvious or blantant is all the more nefarious to me, because most people in the country don’t realize the extent to which they’ve been screwed.
Probably because “most people in the country” aren’t affected. Regardless of what you may believe, the “system” is still very much intact. If something is believed to be unconstitutional it can be challenged in the courts. If the courts say that there is no Constitutitional issue, then there isn’t one. If they determine that there is one, then whatever law is concerned is struck down, regardless of what the President says.
You can run around saying the whole system has been corrupted, but that’s tinfoil hat nonsense. The only people who have been “screwed” by broader law enforcement powers are criminals. I don’t see thousands of innocent people being rounded up and locked away like during WW1 and WW2 right here in our own country. Hell I think even in Gitmo there are only a few hundred people, and none of them is Joe Average American Citizen with no ties to terrorists.
The government isn’t going to waste their time arresting people that are just going to waste space and money unless they have a damn good reason. These academic arguments about rights are fine and dandy, but lets look at the reality of whats happening. There hasn’t been this massive usurping of rights that has just devastated the freedoms of all Americans, like some around here want us to believe.
I have all the same rights I had 10 years ago. In fact the only way I’ve been affected personally with the new laws since 9/11 is inconvenience when travelling via air.
Let’s be frank here, unless you’re an Arab American with a close family member or acquaintance who is affiliated with terrorists, you’re probably not going to attract much attention from the government. They don’t have the time, money or resources to go around wiretapping random Americans without a court order, like some here would have us believe is going on.
It still holds that many in Gitmo are guilty of nothing more than being in the wrong place at the wrong time, and being the wrong color, and regardless of guilty or innoncence, the torture going on there is unAmerican and reprehensible, and on that point I’m absolutely immovable. Things like due process and habeus corpus are only right and sensible, for our own sakes.
It’s all about precendents being set, it’s a slippery slope, and people thinking “well, I didn’t do anything wrong so I’m not at all concerned is naive. I don’t believe in equating Bush to Hitler or Pincohe or anything of the kind. I think the way people on the net particulary throw the words ‘nazi’ and ‘facist’ around is not ok. However, I’d recommend *everyone* read Naomi Wolf’s book “The End of America: A Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot”, she says it better than I can.
I don’t believe there IS a slippery slope. And if there is, theres a nice big boulder stopping us called the court system. There may be many things bad about our government, but it has ample checks and balances that no President can override if the courts or congress don’t want to let him.
If precedent being set is what you’re concerned about… it was already set. Have you forgotten our imprisonment of German Americans in WW1 and Japanese Americans in WW2? Not only did the government not have proof they did anything wrong, the government _admitted_ they had done nothing wrong and that it was just a preventative measure. Thousands lost their homes, businesses, and land. Familys were split up and people lost everything.
It was worse than anything in Gitmo by an order of magnitude. So, if there was precedent set, it wasn’t by Dubya. If anything we have shown restraint compared to what our country has done in the past.
I just don’t think it’s wise to leave so much faith in the court system, especially if a bunch of ‘activist judges’ (either liberal or conservative) get placed on the supreme court, and we all know Bush did all her could to get ultra-conservative judges into the Supreme Court, and that Monica Gooding debacle didn’t inspire a lot of faith in me either. As U.S. citizens it behooves us all to scrutinize the governments actions and stay concerned about our rights, regardless of who is in office.
It’s also arguable, that given technology like the internet, the government doesn’t need to intern people, because it can watch them via technology.
While the interments were terrible, extememly terrible, I don’t recall learningt about any actual *torture* taking place, and thus I don’t thing it’s right to say internment was *worse* than Gitmo. I don’t want to try to prove that one is worse than the other, I don’t think that that’s fair or right. I don’t think it’s right to minimize or ignore human rights abuses *anywhere*. As MLK said, “an affront to justice anywhere, is an affront to justice everywhere”.
Hmm. The displacement of over 110,000 members of an ethnic group, with concomitant confiscation without compensation of their homes, businesses, and other property doesn’t equate to torture. Why don’t you ask some of them, if you could get them to speak to you.
Versus a couple of hundred NON-CITIZENS who just happened to be shooting at us, transporting weapons, or otherwise engaged in activities inimical to the civilized world (not just the US).
IMO they should have been, and (NOT my opinion, but liable under provisions of the vaunted Geneva Conventions) shot where they were found. They have no rights under US law. AFAIC, those who argue that they do are enemies of civilization as well. If we need to get time-critical information from them in a timely manner, I say go for it, using the most effective means possible.
‘Course, you and yer pals’d rather go over there and chat ‘em up while drinking tea with your pinkies extended . . . until they sawed your heads off.
Please, in your counter-argument, do not point out your precious left-wing studies that claim that torture doesn’t work. A study can be made to show anything, and I’ve looked at the data they used for those studies. Their interrogators were amateurs at best, with little to no idea what they were doing.
From what I saw, yes-or-no questions with obvious answers were used multiple times, which is a novice mistake during an interrogation, since anyone allowed on the front lines is taught to withstand interrogation via admission to whatever the enemy wants to hear, so that the truth is therefore masked. Admit to everything, even contradictory statements, and the interrogator has nothing useful to take from you. The only way to successfully prove or disprove the use or lack thereof of torture would be with trained professionals handling the interrogation, and not one of your published studies on the subject has used that.
Sorry, had this debate one too many times with co-workers, so I can smell that argument coming.
Nihilism looking better and better. Anarchy is for pansies.
Separation is spelled like this . . . separation. Did W write it too?? ;0)
If D.C. ever got nuked by terrorists, would you be more upset over losing our politicians or losing the poor kitties and puppies in D.C. ?
I’d worry more about the monuments and stuff…
How long do you think it’d take to rebuild the tribute to Clinton?
The Clinton Library and Massage Parlour? Isn’t that in Hot Springs?
*snort* you know, we have very different politics, but you crack me up!
I’m an equal opportunity lampooner
ANd I have to admit that I sort of stole that. It doesn’t make it less funny though 
Equal opportunity is what America is all about! That’s one reason SNL holds a special place in my heart, I know they’ve been having a hey dey with Palin lately (and come on, it’s too easy, how could they not) but *no one* absoulutely no one, is above their mockery. It’s wonderful.
Which is exactly why I love South Park
*gasp* all those poor kittehs and goggies! And cool buildings! *sob* noooooooooooo! Oh, politicians? Hmm… theyre a dime a dozen >_<
Mission accomplished.
Police state, mmhmmm ok.
Name 3 rights that we’ve all lost since 2001. To be fair I have already included the rights to express, view, read, write, talk about, demonstrate, buy, sell, compare, advertise, be pro- or agin- that we deal with in our daily lives with no fear of retribution, with money in our pockets and a cup of starbucks in our hand…all of which have been taken from us.
and if obama wins our country will fall further into financial ruin.. read your history books people.. use your heads…
Barack Obama’s Inbox for Jan 21