Of course she’s qualified…
Of course she’s qualified… Alaska is way bigger than Texas
(John McCain)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: RexSpeed
Show Only: News | Democrats | Republicans | Media
« Previous Could be worse… | last happy family Next »
» 71 Comments
Get Daily Lol News Emails
RSS Lol News Feed
-
Recent Comments
Bare Dirt on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… Igor the Vigorous on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… eddiepscetti on See, I drew eyes, a nose, and … froofrou on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… Igor the Vigorous on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… Bare Dirt on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… Semperfidd on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… Igor the Vigorous on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO… suicide_blonde on HYPOCRISY Danbala on THE ORIGINAL BORDER PATRO…
Spreads hands to show the size of Obama’s ears!
Oh no you didn’t!!!! That subject is off limits. (Please refer to the Obama Campaign Code)
You must have missed that earlier lol on PK with Obama’s ears and plane engines. Not one leftie here was outraged. Lose.
Hah!
Palin is now more popular than Obama.
“A week ago, most Americans had never heard of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin. Now, following a Vice Presidential acceptance speech viewed live by more than 40 million people, Palin is viewed favorably by 58% of American voters. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 37% hold an unfavorable view of the self-described hockey mom.
. . . .
“The new data also shows significant increases in the number who say McCain made the right choice and the number who say Palin is ready to be President. Generally, John McCain’s choice of Palin earns slightly better reviews than Barack Obama’s choice of Joe Biden.
“Perhaps most stunning is the fact that Palin’s favorable ratings are now a point higher than either man at the top of the Presidential tickets this year. As of Friday morning, Obama and McCain are each viewed favorably by 57% of voters. Biden is viewed favorably by 48%.”
How’d that smear thing work out for you, Democrats?
Smear thing?
So, when’s Palin going to drop McCain from the ticket?
Yes, the smear thing where lefties attacked Palion’s children and told lies about her family. There was plenty of it in the threads here.
As for the Palin presidential ticket — 2012 or 2016.
When he dies. Could be any day now.
Sarah Palin is better qualified and more experienced than Obama. She’d make a fine President.
Pregnant 17 year old daughters for everyone!!!!
Keep up the smears, liberals.
It’s worked so well for you over the past week.
Good God Almighty, you are evil. It is breaking the commandments to say things which you know to be true.
What smears? That she espouses abstinence-only education yet her underage daughter has become pregnant, largely out of that very sort of sexual knoedge?
That she has without quibble used numerous earmarks to slash social prorams particularly for women while endorsing high-cost low-yeild oil company projects?
That she was willing to sell out her own state’s natural resources at ANWR?
Or that she is under investigation for supposedly firing a state trooper out of personal vengence?
Which of those, you evil and hell-bound heathen, are false? None, and you know it.
Satan is waiting for your kind. The liars, the hypocrites, the malicious, and those who never learned to love their fellow man. Your antipathy for that greatest commandment to Love Thy Neighbor has reached fever pitch.
I beg of you, Mr. Pundit. Return to the flock of the good, honest, and compassionate before it is too late. We are not spiteful; we will let anyone back in.
Come back before your soul has finished turning coal black.
You assume she believes that her daughter getting pregnant is some sort of “punishment”. Now, who do we know who thinks that?
Ooh! Ooh! I know that one!
Right wing fundies.
guess again…
Your mother.
too late…
*BZZT* Wrong!
“I wouldn’t want my daughter to be punished with a baby.” — Barack Obama.
Thank you for playing!
Bingo!!
ema, I may, on occasion, well maybe more than on occasion, disagree with you, but we can tell when you are making a statement and when a non player is, so for the record, keep up as you do and we’ll love to debate with you. Although, a little below here I believe that your stalker accidently made a humorous point.
Black people shouldn’t have babies anyway.
Cut it out, I did not say this, someone is stalking me…
You know, this is pissing me off, if you don’t like what I have to say why don’t you just counter it with your own name instead of using mine. Jerk! Also, what if we all started doing this? The whole board would be reduced to gibberish. Would that make you happy? Are you all of 10 years old? Coward!!
Actually, I think 10 year old boys are hawt.
Has to be Jellybeans- she’s stalked Hueydoc before…
That is completely false. When I post I do it under my own name. and I did not stalk Hueydoc, I told someone else that if they were all that interested they could post-stalk him using cntrl-f
-
Of course given your candidates it is obvious that truth has very little to do with your style.
Cheezburgers, please, for the love of God, do something about this fake name thing! This person is ruining what was a really good site!
Maybe if we all notify the site? Personally I think we should have to login before we can post comments. It would certainly stop the faking that’s going on.
What a silly comment.
I believe the smears referred to are the ones claiming her 5th
child Trigg be her daughter’s child with her pretending to have the pregnancy as a coverup. It was disproven by her amazing admission that here daughter was actually pregnant now, so could possibly have had the boy 5 months ago or what ever the timing was. It was an incredibly malicious rumor that was never substantiated, and since been disproven, and apparently forgotten about too. I’m no Palin fan whatsoever, but these tactics are fucking disgusting tbh.
That being said I think her early popularity wave will plateau, and quite possibly lose ground, once the scripts and obliging devoted audiences are taken away.
That was funny, Filler!
Any ratings I saw showed her about a million behind Obama … but then facts don’t bother repugs (as seen in that widely watched speech you mention)
You are an idiot. I’m talking about approval ratings, not TV ratings.
Click my name for the full report.
(P.S. McCain’s speech actually had more viewers than Obama’s, so you lose on that score too)
showcased his lousy speech before a wide audience. good.
PLUS – you mentioned the “40 million viewers” the ratings reports I referred to showed her under 38
Umm, wait… you guys think being popular is equal to being a lightweight… why are you bragging?
shhh, we don’t bring up the obvious gaping holes in their logic. That is sexist you know. Or in my case, since they give me my own special derogatory, it is racist.
Besides, it’s only when -our- candidate is popular.
Their reaction to the DNC: “So what? That was just a speech. Speeches don’t mean anything.”
Their reaction to the RNC: “Holy ow! Did you hear that speech? We ahve this in the bag!”
The current GOP candidate for VP is qualified to skip any mention of original constructive plans or thought processes, focus on extolling nothing but personal attacks, manufacture false accusations against her opponents, try to play big, but break down and cry when things get too tough, submit her own personal information to use to her own advantage, then cry foul when she doesn’t like how it plays out, then falsly accuse her opponent of using it against her. Typical for the ticket that first bemoans Obama’s inexperience then picks someone without any, bemoans Obama’s message of change then gives a speech about change. If McCain didn’t setal Obama’s ideas, he wouldn’y have any at all… guess the GOP beat it out of him when they beat out any independent thought that he may have once had.
Palin has more experience than Obama. And she has a higher popularity rating, too.
It sure must suck when the Republicans’ veep pick is better than your candidate for President in every important respect.
Actually she doesn’t. What she has is different experience. The major focus of the GOP convention was negative attacks. The major focus of the Democratic convention was planning for the future and how to fix the nightmare left by 8 years of GOP mismanagement. I choose to look towards the future, not to waste my time on the GOP plan of when you have nothing to offer, attack your opponent’s credibility. I haven’t been in this forum for long, but the only posts I’ve seen from you have been negative, derogatory personal attacks upon Sen Obama, Sen Biden and “liberals” in general. I’m glad I don’t live in your “family values” world.
Actually, Obama’s speech contained more attacks on McCain than Palin’s did attacks on Obama.
Democrats have been running the politics of personal smears against George Bush for years.
And in just one week, we’ve seen an incredible amount of filth flung at Sarah Palin’s children by Democratic Party operatives.
This has blown back in your faces, as now Palin has the sympathy of the public, while Obama and his cronies are rightly seen as the slime-merchants they are.
See, what’s fun about you is the whole “I like making ridiculously noncontextual claims” and “I like making completely opinion based claims.” I also like how you slather hypocrite sauce over it too. Does it taste good that way? Om nom nom.
Palin was chosen by God, did you hear? Because Alaska is where “we’ll have to go in the end times.” And that is why I don’t listen to you bloody fundies.
Seriously, I’ve been lurking for almost 4 months, and you are the most banal and obnoxious person here. We could discredit the entire Repub party by having you as its spokeperson.
And then you’ll say something like “oh, you’re obviously a liberal mouthpiece, why didn’t you bash on Seth?”
You might even through in some adjective like slimy, or idiotic. Maybe you can even discredit TIME magazine like you did about a month earlier as a liberal dishrag.
Seriously, I bet you stick up your keyboard every time you post.
Want to censor any books while you’re at it?
Books are bad. Only terrorists read.
WIN
My claims are factual and can be easily verified.
That you fail to argue against my claims, and instead resort to hysterical personal attacks, merely reveals the weakness of your position.
“Easily verified” = “I found them on a FoxNews blog”
I didn’t say that all of them weren’t factual, yet so many of them are taken out of context. And many of the things you say are just straight opinion. I notice how you call the Obama speeches slimy and vicious, but you like harping on Edwards having an affair. Isn’t that his personal life? Why do you have to single someone out? Unless it’s that hypocrite marinade you like so much. You carry that like a cross.
And srsly, hysterical? Fap fap fap. Got any more?
Palin is pro-life enough to scare off Mrs. McCain, fundie enough for the endtimes believers to support, and just closeminded enough to feel like banning books isn’t a return to the stone age. Isn’t part of McCain’s platform defending our rights in the Constitution? Protect the Second Amendment, that’s just fine. But protect the first too.
The worst part is, I liked McCain! I had a hard time between Obama and McCain. But Palin just takes the cake.
Please go back to lurking. I liked you better that way.
Don’t worry, I liked you quiet too. ^_^
Nope, throwing the BS flag out on this one. Palin brought the “attacks” if you can call them attacks on herself. She entered the arena as a relative unknown, using her special needs child to prove her social conservative credentials. ALL other candidates have been veted by the press throughout the long histories of their careers. She chose to enter the arena, she released the details of her family life, therefore the press had an obligation to investigate her background to the extent required, centered on McCain’s validation process, not her family. Having said that, the personal life of her children is irrevelant and off limits, except when she uses those cirmstances to bolster her political credibility. But, as stated by the Democratic national candidate, and as acknowledged, publically, by Palin herself, her family is off limits, something the GOP and its “operatives” don’t abide by.
you’re right. 20 months as a governor of a state where she was handed a balanced budget, surplus of dividends from oil, and social programming that has a ridiculous amount of funding SO qualifies her over someone who actually had to WORK for any sort of social change in a city and state without such abundances of resources and fiscal budgets, and a Senate which has more dysfunctionality than an entire day’s worth of soap operas.
yeah, you just keep clinging to that raft in your river of denial. i’ll be over here in reality-ville, where real-life keeps on going.
Obama never had to work to change anything in Chicago. He was a part of the ruling political machine all along.
The only actual “work” Obama did was to preside over the Chicago Annenberg Challenge with his terrorist friend Bill Ayers. That project spent $110 million on “educational reform”, yet its sponsors judged it a failure.
Unlike Sarah Palin’s successful career, Obama’s only leadership position was a dismal failure.
at least he spent money on educational reform. Palin cut the special needs funding by 62% … but hey, all you special needs moms have an advocate now … according to her speech.
don’t forget she left Wasilla 20 million in the hole even after lobbying and receiving $27 million (for a town of less than 7,00 at the time) in federal earmarks
7,000
Pork-Barrel Palin supported the Bridge to Nowhere before she opposed it.
Obama has the same experience as Lincoln. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
A Foot Long and only 5 Dollars!
McCain-Palin ‘08. Building A Bridge To Nowhere.
You are The Boss… which team would you hire?
With America facing historic debt, multiple war fronts, stumbling health care, a weakened dollar, all-time high prison population, skyrocketing Federal spending, mortgage crises, bank foreclosures, etc. etc., this is an ***unusually critical*** election year.
Let’s look at the educational background of your two options:
Obama:
Occidental College – Two years.
Columbia University – B.A. political science with a specialization in international relations.
Harvard – Juris Doctor (J.D.) Magna Cum Laude
& Biden:
University of Delaware – B.A. in history and B.A. in political science.
Syracuse University College of Law – Juris Doctor (J.D.)
vs.
McCain:
United States Naval Academy – Class rank 894 of 899
& Palin:
Hawaii Pacific University – 1 semester
North Idaho College – 2 semesters – general study
University of Idaho – 2 semesters – journalism
Matanuska-Susitna College – 1 semester
University of Idaho – 3 semesters – B.A. in journalism
Now, which team are you going to “hire” ?
Unfortunately, the voters proved 8 years ago that they’d go for the simple minded moron over the guy who can actually fix our problems…
That’s because they like people just like them! You know, people with 5 houses who leave their wife for a a 25 year old millionaires, women who wear $200,000 outfits. You know, men and women of the people. Not people who are ‘elite’ because they worked hard from nothing and made something of themselves. New money is so tacky.
Five houses? I’ll have my staff get back to you on that.
7 houses, and the earrings alone were estimated at $283k
Not to be a nit-picker
Plus, you forgot the wife was crippled and he was banging Cindy before the divorce.
Oh, and Palin has been accused of sleeping with her husband’s business partner. The same business partner that sought an injunction to make his divorce records sealed … that was denied so let’s see what comes out next!
The media just LOVES scandals. Shouldn’t take long.