Fun with politics and news! Covering Lol Politics and Lol News. Breaking news — lol-style.

Show Only: News | Democrats | Republicans | Media

 

« Previous On My Honor | papa likes Next »

Actually, you can. (Sarah Palin Bikini Picture?)


Sarah Palin Bikini Pictures - Photoshopped

(Sarah Palin* photoshopped)

picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: mbf203

Actually, you CAN make this stuff up.

Photoshopped head of Sarah Palin on Someone else’s body – to see the original click the image or link.

Original source of Sarah Palin bikini photoshopped picture

Photoshop source of Sarah Palin bikini picture
Click to see the original pre-photoshopped photo.

Incorrect source or offensive?
Reddit This
Stumbleupon This
Post This to Facebook

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 186 Comments

  1. fale says:

    Right….

  2. Eric says:

    If I didn’t know that photo was ’shopped, I’d believe it.

  3. dude im on it says:

    That’s a pretty good ‘Shop…

  4. bittervoter says:

    My first reaction was “yikes….” my second reaction is, “Hey! Photoshopping is cheating!”. At least it’s a well done photoshop, I’ve seen really bad ones.

  5. ashlee1313 says:

    Wow, that’s some pretty good photoshop. I thought it was real at first. Funny shit.

  6. Horse says:

    BBGun… Lol.

  7. Jane St.Clair says:

    Meh, that pic would have made a good caption on its own, photoshopping makes it lame.

    • dude im on it says:

      I kinda like the visual representation of what everyone makes her out to be.

      • fjaradvax says:

        *either* the face *or* the cap, would be pretty funny, in a straightforward LOLpol sort of way, but taken together they carry a darker, subtler humour: an autodeconstructed snapshot of the process by which the collective mind (consciously and unconsciously) projects archetypal imagery onto social and political figureheads. Or something. Perhaps I’m thinking too hard…

        • Charlie Foxtrot says:

          Yeah, this time I think that you are, respectfully. I thought it was lame when I voted against it, but, on a side note, you notice whose smoking a cigarette and whose ready to go. The GOP does use subliminal messages in their compaigns.

  8. jd says:

    I want to like it (as I hate Palin) but *knowing* it’s shopped makes it lame. :-(

  9. TimBob says:

    Of couse it is ’shopped. Governor Palin wouldn’t be caught dead posing like that with a fricken BB gun, she prefers AR-15’s.

    • ema says:

      Ha! and she’s gunnin’ for Biden! Can’t wait for the debates…

      • n8 says:

        Ditto that. It’s gonna be like Bentsen & Quayle all over again. She’ll actually need the gun if she wants to walk out a winner.

        • Lolnathan says:

          Considering the debates are a measure of who can bullshit other people the easiest, hands down for Biden. You don’t spend that long in the senate without being able to bold faced lie and make people believe it is the gospel truth.

      • Joey Jojo Shabbadoo says:

        Yeah. ARs with no mag, a laser down the barrel and not properly using the optics. Oooh. Aaaah. She can pose with a gun. Whoopity doo.

  10. Ceefax says:

    She actually looks less unhinged in this ’shop than she appears when she opens her mouth. This lady’s belt doesn’t go through all the loops, not surprising considering the wing-nut churches she’s attended in the past. Probably ducked out of her speech due to a snake-handling injury.

    • daveynelson says:

      Heh…. yer gunna need more glue if yer gunna try and put that Glass Ceiling back together, boyo.

      • Ceefax says:

        Oh, stop playing the gender card, it’s pathetic. It has nothing to do with her being a woman or ‘breaking glass ceilings’, it has everything to do with her being unhinged, inexperienced and unfit to govern. If McCain knew what he knows now about her, he’d never have picked her and it’s still more than possible that he’s going to dump her.

        • jellybeans says:

          Shhh, it’s all they have.
          McCain/Tits ‘08!

        • Lolnathan says:

          Your kind didn’t have much nice to say about Hillary either, and she’s one of your own kind. You political types on both sides of the aisle just hate women, it’s that simple.

          Politics and the partisan hacks on PK are full of spiteful hating individuals who have nothing better to do than bring someone else down. We can’t even have a good “lol” anymore without you people ruining everything.

          • jellybeans says:

            I am assuming you include yourself in the “you people”
            No?
            Of course not …
            Hilary is awesome, I like her a lot and will vote for her in 2016 after Obama’s 8. I don’t think she would have been a good VP, she is a very strong woman and she would have had a hard time taking the second spot I think.
            She will make an awesome President though.

            • n8 says:

              Seriously. I’m not a big fan of Hillary, but Palin couldn’t carry her jock (wait… that doesn’t work… brassiere?)

            • Lolnathan says:

              Obama’s 8? LOL. Such blind loyalty in someone without a proven track record one way or the other. I’m not saying he’ll do a bad job, but you don’t know tht he will.

              You’d think the guy was the second coming the way you worshippers treat him.

              Maybe if you partisan idiots had half a brain, instead of jellybeans for brains, you’d choose someone from your party who is a known quantity.

              • n8 says:

                Like… Palin?

                • Lolnathan says:

                  Hence why she isn’t the Presidential nominee, McCain is.

                  But that’s okay, you douchenozzles don’t seem to know who is running. Half of you think it’s Bush running in ‘08, the other half think its Palin.

                  • n8 says:

                    Bush, McCain, what’s the difference?

                    • Lolnathan says:

                      Carter, Clinton, what’s the difference?

                      See? Doesn’t quite work does it, despite all their political similarities.

                      • n8 says:

                        Uhhh…. nope, not seeing it. McCain would be a Repub follow-on to a sitting Repub administration, and would uphold just about every policy currently existing. Clinton and Carter were separated by three opposition-party administrations and had entirely different geopolitical situations to deal with. You fail.

                  • D'oh says:

                    Bush apperantly thought the same if you heard him talk about McCain being a good successor and all. If McCain actually voted with Bush 90% off the time, it’s not that wierd if you start to think that policy-wise, Bush and McCain aren’t thát different.

                    PS: Generalisation is a bad thing, mkay?

                    PPS: I fell for it the first 3 seconds, then started paying more attention to the head. Still dig the body though, beats the hell out of those uber-skinny models ;) Literally and figurally probably.

                  • 1.618 says:

                    Palin is still one step away from being President should McCain drop dead or something.

                    If you really think that being a VP is not as important as being Presidnet, then you need to brush up on your non-existent knowledge of politics.

                    Dickhead.

                • Shawna says:

                  Oh, Snap!

              • jellybeans says:

                You always complain about personal attacks … and yet you lead the way with yours. I guess you are just like Palin: Do as I say not as my family does.

                • Charlie Foxtrot says:

                  Her family is irrevelent, she on the other hand is an idiot and McCain is worse because knowing all of these issues he went for her anyway. What it says is I picked a VP that had she been a man, would never have stood up to GOP and general public morality, yet because she is a woman, you can’t pick her or you will look bad.

                  • victimoftheswirl says:

                    Actually, her family is quite relevent. You can tell a lot about someone’s management skills based on the way they manage their home life. Her management skills aren’t up to par for my choice for second in command of our government.

              • bittervoter says:

                Um, dear, it’s “entitity”,”known entity”. Proper English is your friend.

                • Lolnathan says:

                  Um, dear, it’s “known quantity.” Even it wasn’t, it’s still proper English since they are both English words in their proper places.

                  Google Results for “known quantity” 304,000, the top few listings being sites that reference such sayings.
                  Google Results for “known entity” 64,000, all being random crap.

                  Sorry “dear.”

            • Jane St.Clair says:

              I also love Hillary, I in fact voted for her. Many republicans are forgetting the abuse they heaped on Hillary while she was first lady and later senator and would have continued to heap on her had she won the nomination. The cries of “poor Hillary, look at how bad she’s being treated” is nothing but situational politics designed to stir up dissent and it makes me sick, how hypocritical.

              -

              As for her being VP that would have been a bad decision. Having a former president in the white house when he is married to the president is one thing. Having a former president married to the vice president would have undermined Obama’s authority. I agree that she will still be young enough to run in 2016 and I’ll happily vote for her again, if that’s the case.

              • Gorgonzola says:

                Agrees (except for the voting part, being from Scotland)

                On the part of the campaigning it seems ridiculously negative, I mainly hear that they’re attacking each other on the news and media (I listen to and watch quite a bit of the us media)

                Here in the UK its a hell of a lot more boring.

                In fact the most interesting thing to happen in politics is when Prescott punched a protester in the face back in ‘01

          • n8 says:

            You’re just pissed because it isn’t a Republican circle-jerk anymore. Go cry, emo kid.

            • Lolnathan says:

              When was it ever?

              You’re just pissed because you’re not old enough to vote for your Lord and Savior.

              • n8 says:

                Am I not? I suppose I’d better hand back this voter registration card then… pity, I’ve rather enjoyed the use of it since voting for the second Clinton administration. Good times.

                I don’t blame you for confusing admiration for religious fervor, though. As a Republican, it must be a really alien idea to have a candidate that inspires enthusiasm.

                • Lolnathan says:

                  Actually I’m a registered independent and my voting record since being of age is Clinton, Clinton, Bush, Kerry. Though my local government votes are distinctly democrat because republicans dont even run here. State votes are a mixed bag.

                  And no candidate in the last 8 years has inspired enthusiasm. I was pushing hard for Hillary, but that was only out of fear of the other options. Senators make bad Presidents in general, but she has more exposure to executive governing than any of the other candidates.

                  • n8 says:

                    I think it would be more accurate to say that no candidate has inspired YOU in the past 8 years. Obviously there are many who do find Obama to be inspiring, myself included. Of course there will be cynics ready with their mockery, but those kind of people will mock one for being enthusiastic about anything, so there’s no need to pay them any attention.

                    • Lolnathan says:

                      I don’t get dazzled by hype, that’s the thing. The fact is, I don’t think I’ll ever be inspired. The era of the inspiring politician is over. To paraphrase something I read a while back: The crown of government has been too tarnished, and there is no cleaning it. Once I grew up and learned more about the political system in the U.S. and how it works, I realized there will never be a candidate who can deliver on their promises. The system does not allow it. You cannot succeed in American politics without money, lots of money, and who has 99% of the money? The richest 1%. So the various industries and organizations line up on their preferred side of the aisle. In my opinion the only smart choice is to pick who you think is going to be able to do the most from within the system. There is no revolutionary candidate, they are bound by the realities of the position. Maybe that’s cynical, but I believe it’s just reality.

                      • n8 says:

                        I respect your view, and to an extent I agree. However, I think that Obama will follow through on the majority of what he’s setting out to accomplish. I think he’s got the leadership to make it happen. Thus my enthusiasm.

                        • ema says:

                          Obama wasn’t promising anything new, tell me one thing he promised that was new or revolutionary? One thing that hadn’t been promised by Carter, or any of the others at one time or another. He was towing the old party line and was beholden to the Chicago political machine many of whom were his backers. There was no change!

                        • n8 says:

                          There’s way too much ground to cover. Read his speeches and check his website, everything he wants to accomplish is in there. I couldn’t do it justice here. I wouldn’t go so far as to say anything he’s talking about is brand spankin’ new, but it’s definitely a major shift away from the current administration’s policies.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          As I mentioned in a previous LOL, whether it’s McCain or Obama, they will be done in by Congress.

                        • herb says:

                          You know, eddie, pros and cons are opposites, so the opposite of Progress…

                        • crystallinequantity says:

                          FTL.
                          Everybody on top (Obama, Biden, McCain) are out of the Senate. Which is part of our Con-Gress. Therefore this new administration will be closer to Congress than anytime since, like, Washington was giving blow jobs with his walrus teeth, or whatever he did to become el Presidente… That prospect excites me. That and a Milfs Gone Wild Oval Office Orgy. What this country needs, clearly, is more booze and sex in the White House.

                          Shots for Everybody 2008! Don’t Worry, we took Cheney’s guns!

                        • herb says:

                          *sigh*

                          It’s called “friendly banter”. Try it some time.

                        • Kurt says:

                          Wow, just wow. Does anyone else want to take this one? (Crystallinequantity’s post) there is just so much fail there. I think this one is open for either side to rip on.

                        • eddiepscetti says:

                          Kurt, why bother? It’s obvious this persons family tree never branched.

                    • D'oh says:

                      Inspiration doesn’t buy you good policies ;) Stop looking at the advertisements, start looking at the product itself. To bad the product isn’t discussed that much. I’m still longing for seeing the economists and sociologists discuss the things that réally matter.

                      • n8 says:

                        That’s the thing. If it were just fluff, I would’ve lost interest
                        a while ago. Having listened to his speeches, I’m convinced that he’ll provide action to accompany his words.

                        And hey, even if he only gets half of it done, he’s a far cry better than the alternative!

                        • D'oh says:

                          I’m not convinced of anything untill I see evidence, support from actual experts ;) I will never trust politicians because they make me enthusiastic, the job they have is WAY to important for that (especially a president).

                        • n8 says:

                          Ok, but where does that leave you vis-a-vis McCain? Sure, he’s uninspiring, but that’s hardly reason to trust him. Besides, given the past eight years, I’d as soon elect Paris Hilton’s dog to the presidency than entrust it to another Republican.

                        • D'oh says:

                          Don’t write a politician off per definition just because of his brand ;) Judge them as individuals, of what they want to do themselfs. I don’t care that McCain would be a Republican, nor that Obama would be a Democrat. I only care about the actual policies, the things they want to do with the country. Less brand, more product.

                    • bittervoter says:

                      I remember something from Obama’s new hampshire speech, and I quote it here because I think it’s relevant and I think it was very beautifully said, not because I worship the man and think his word is law or anything : “We’ve been told we cannot do this by a chorus of cynics. Their voices will only grow louder and more dissonant”.
                      It’s true what you say, some people can’t distinguish enthusiam from worship and make fun of anyone who shows it. There’s no hope for them, but they’re the minority I think. :)

                  • jellybeans says:

                    I don’t believe a word of what you said about your voting record. You are about half a shade from EP level.
                    You bash me for having views about ecology, censorship and a woman’s right to chose.
                    I am thinking you are a conservative trying to be heard by claiming to be an independent.

                    • Lolnathan says:

                      I’ve said nothing about those opinions, and I happen to agree with them. It’s the ridiculous exaggerated way in which you portray them that I disagree with. I don’t disagree with the views of many of the left-aligned people here, but I do dislike their attitudes, and I dislike partisanship as a whole. The only reason I come across as being harder on the left-aligned people than the right, is because there are about 500 times as many democrats as republicans here, and a TON more vocal ones. All the right-hand side has is Evil Pundit, and he gets picked on enough. In fact I’m probably about one of the most socially liberal people there is. Here are some of my views:

                      1) War on Drugs = A joke. It’s about as effective as prohibition was. Legalize certain drugs and strictly control their sale, educate people about the possible negative consequences of using various drugs. They’d instantly remove the violence from the drug trade, and turn it into just another business.

                      2) Abortion should be completely available up until the child has a good chance of being viable if they had been born prematurely. Of course, even this has some flaws because eventually science will reach a point where we can take a 2 week old fetus and raise it into a fully grown child without its mother being involved at all. But that’s neither here nor there. Beyond viability, I think that certain ailments that can be detected make a strong case for abortion being preferable to a short and painful life.

                      3) Marriage for all. Why not really? Marriage is going to be gone in the future anyway once people realize its just a vestige of ancient religious mumbojumbo.

                      4) Government assistance. Not necessarily a social view, but… I believe that while the private sector should be left largely to their own machinations, that certain cases really require government intervention for the good of the people. As far as individual assistance, I feel that anyone who is doing their part to contribute to our country should not be left in the cold, or at the mercy of some bank.

                      5) Women’s rights: I don’t see any particular reason women should be barred from anything or discouraged from anything. Sadly there is a lot of latent sexism out there. It’ll die down once all these old codgers kick the bucket.

                      But yeah, my views probably coincide a lot with yours. However, I still think you act like an utter moron on these boards, and make the rest of us who share your beliefs look like a bunch of whackjobs who will attack anyone or anything that disagrees with us.

                  • cey says:

                    First thing we learned in Poli Sci in HIGHSCHOOL.

                    Registering indi is dumb. It limits your own power to influence the politiccal system.

              • Gorgonzola says:

                What??!!!?!?!?

                We can vote for the next messiah?

          • bittervoter says:

            Hahahahah! Dude, you just made me laugh so hard, how can I NOT mock that?
            As a feminist, let me tell you that Hillary, Palin, and women in general don’t need your defense or protection. Hillary has been the object of such animosity from right-wingers for YEARS, but now they’re trying to pretend they feel sorry for her to gain votes. Hillary and Palin are political figures, and if you’re going to be in politics you better be prepared to take whatever shit is slung at you.

          • gypsimoon says:

            Oh please Lolnathan, Palin is working her femaleness to the hilt. Lets see. Has five children one who has Down syndrome (due no doubt to what is called a ‘change of life’ baby and generally is a surprise), but she CHOSE to have the child as did her 17 year-old daughter who pundits extole how as a great mother, she supports her child (as moms should do).

            During the convention, Palin can be seen handling her kids lovingly and showing them off at every opportunity, especially Bristal, who is constantly holding her widdle brother. What a lovely family they are attempting to project. So don’t go with not liking women. Although, the Republicans picking a ultra conservative, gun-toteing, salmon fishing, moose hunting and a huge religious right wing nut is far and away any hint of femanism, unlike Hillary. Most people who turned away from Hillary, like I did, did so because she is too ambitious and is viewed by many as too power hungry.

            Now as far as hateful. What the……. Palin’s speech at the convention was basically a rant against democrates in general and Obama in particular, I heard absolutly no substance. Ummmm, gee what about the economy stupid? She was the one talking about inexperience, she spoke about community service is basically bullsh#*% as far as experience is concerned. Yet, her experience as Mayer and later govenor is frought with dubious dealings.

            GET A CLUE

        • hobo sapiens says:

          dude…. you’re the one that equated “unhinged” with a woman in a bikini.

  11. Rawr says:

    I was a little excited for a second. I was like, dude, flag bikini wielding a gun… I’d vote for her.

  12. Dregs says:

    wow…. lrn to color correct noobs… body is waaaay too pink for the head, head is taken from a smaller pic too, you can see the grain. those of you even fooled by this… fail

  13. rachel says:

    Its an obvious photoshop – you can see the difference in skin tone. Any decent graphic designer would have done a better job.

    • Lolnathan says:

      The Obama campaign volunteers aren’t the best Photoshop artists in the world, give them credit for at least trying.

      • Whatev. says:

        Right… because the it’s *always* the other campaign’s doing as soon as stupid shit like this crops up. You don’t get to get away with saying ‘Hey, I wasn’t blaming Obama DIRECTLY I said his VOLUNTEERS,’ either, because everyone knows exactly what you meant, and who you were attacking.

        • ema says:

          so? maybe he doesn’t care what you think

        • Lolnathan says:

          It’s always the opposing campaign or one of their affiliates. ALWAYS. No one else has enough connections to spread a proper smear campaign. And both parties do it.

          Something like this pops up, or some other smear campaign crap, they publicly denounce it because they know it can’t be tied directly to them. If it does get tied to the, they fire the person and all is well.

          You’re naive if you believe Presidential candidates are above this kind of thing. VERY naive.

          • imitation tofu says:

            McCain is still trying to figure out if photoshopping is some kind of terrorist tactic.

          • D'oh says:

            Since when is this picture a part of a smear campaign?? Are you that paranoid? It’s a LOLPAGE for f*ck sake!

            • ema says:

              understanding sarcasm fail!! (even though there is a touch of truth there)

            • Lolnathan says:

              It wasn’t sarcasm as much as it was a general statement only loosely related to the picture. The current smear campaign doesn’t involve this picture, though I’m sure it inspired it.

              Also, the double-sided edge of the “Its a lolpage!” argument is amusing. You can’t have a serious discussion because its a lolpage, but at the same time it’s perfectly acceptable to post something entirely unfunny.

              Here’s a tip for future lol-artists and lol-voters: Just because it’s true, doesn’t make it funny. Just because you agree with it, doesn’t make it funny.

              • D'oh says:

                Yes you can have a serious discussion, you can also have one on the crapper. You can have one (almost) everywher. But always keep in the back of your head what the use or purpous of this site (or any other place) really is.
                By the way, you can turn that around: just because you don’t think it’s funny, doesn’t make it not funny. Humour is something subjective, everybody knows that.
                And about that smear campaign, since when is there 1 going on? You just mean these jokes? Is 1 of the previous lol’s about Obama’s ears also part of some smear campaign then? I think you’re taking these pictures WAY to serious.

          • jellybeans says:

            How is this false? She likes guns and hunting, she wears fur, she is supposedly hot.
            So you have a woman in a bikini with a gun … Sounds like accurate portrayal.

  14. Trainwreck Chaser says:

    Jane, where are you? I miss talking to you.

    • Jane St.Clair says:

      I’ve been here all along, where have YOU been?! Although I haven’t really weighed in on the pic much ’cause I think it’s kinda stupid. I’m waiting for the debate to heat up, which I think is in 3..2..1…

  15. Bob says:

    Palin looks better in a swimsuit than Obama does…

  16. FC says:

    MILF???

    Regardless of Photoshoppedness, I think she’s still a MILF.

  17. Ding Dong says:

    It’s photoshopped, you idiot.

  18. Jami says:

    Obviously someone didn’t check Snopes.com before making the caption.

    Or maybe they did – in which case it would’ve been funnier to include an * followed by the Snopes URL to this story.

  19. Dave says:

    Thank God that’s photoshoped – I’d like to think her body is 10x hotter than that.

    Kinda CBF this “leftists are easily fooled” garbage. Seems to me the McCain camp honestly feels that you guys on the right are easily fooled enough to believe that being an ocean away from Russia gives her foreign policy experience…

    • ema says:

      What does Obama have for foreign policy? A trip to Europe? Also how about that Biden? Saying that Israel just has to “get used to a nuclear armed Iran”?

  20. D'oh says:

    You really think her real body is hotter? I really like this body to be honest, it’s not meager like what’s “hip” nowadays, but a healthy, firm body. Yummy ;)

  21. Marshy says:

    Wow, I thought it was real for a second and thought “Wouldn’t this cause some political controversy?”, then I saw it was shopped. That’s good photoshopping. Didn’t Palin used to be a beauty queen in some Miss Alaska type contest? Anyone know where I can get a swimsuit like that?

    This reminds me of the photos I’ve been seeing in celebrity magazines lately of Barack Obama in the “Best Beach Bodies” issues… He’s not that great. I’m surprised no one has gotten one and added an LOL caption yet.

    • ema says:

      Yea! I’d love to see someone get a hold of that one of him in the ocean and photoshop a squirt gun in his hand!!

    • Hueydoc says:

      Thou hast forgot the First Commandment here- Thou shall not portray thy Savior in a negative light, nor shall you use His image in vain…for the Obama is all pure and powerful and none shall taint Mohamme..er.. Obama!

  22. herb says:

    Can you believe the audacity to this intolerant, liberal-centric, Marxist, Obamessianic website to actually -point out this is fake-? They didn’t even do so for the ’shopped pics of Obama, which just goes to prove their hatred of right-wing America.

  23. kevin says:

    Please take down this fake picture of a major public figure.

  24. dianna says:

    I would believe it …. did you see in the news the animal skin of a fox hanging on her wall? That was real. Just look into the eyes they covet power!!!
    I read she goes for all that trophy hunting stuff …..
    Hmmm I wonder if that is her future son-in-law (shot gun wedding) in the back?
    Who ever did the photoshop is really really really good ….. cause it looks real to me…….Kudos

  25. Jason Winfield says:

    Have any of you leftist morons realized yet that she’s holding a bb gun?

    • Jane St.Clair says:

      Yes, because we read all the comments in the threads and know that several people have mentioned it before. We also know no one was talking about the gun so its type is irrelevant. We know also know that Jason Winfield is an A-hole. Thanks for playing.

    • Josh says:

      Not really. You see, us leftists noticed the chick in the bikini, not the gun she’s holding. Republicans love their guns, Democrats love their tuna. That’s why Bush worshipped the gun and Clinton, well, you know.

  26. You all know that’s a BB gun she’s brandishing there. I have one exactly like it. You can get one at Walmart* for about thirty bucks including the semi-useless scope.

  27. DW says:

    I don’t like her politics, but this demeaning and unnecessary.

  28. Edward says:

    The curious thing in both the critics and defenders is that at first it is believable. It does reflect her philosophy and background. I would like to McCain for this choice. We have not had a clown in the political arena like this since Dan Quayle. I don’t think we need photos like this though. She will provide plenty of opportunities to lampoon her. Why just for starts she has a daughter, whom I sure supported her mother’s position on abstinence, turn up pregnant. That is priceless.

  29. Rex Hondo says:

    For a fair comparison, we’ll just have to wait for her first campaign trip to Indiana, home of the “Show us your tits!” sign.

  30. Miss Antipodes says:

    this is definitely photoshopped….Ms Palin has a better body!

  31. John Q. Public says:

    If the heartbeat issue is of major concern for Gov. Palin then all attention should turn first toward Obama. Should he be elected there would be no heartbeat between the inexperienced Obama and the presidency.

    Be still my beating heart (from panic.)

    • Ceefax says:

      I’d rather have someone with absolutely zero experience than someone like Palin, who only has experience of being an insane religious zelot.

      • hobo sapiens says:

        OK, you hate her based on her religion as well as her sex. We get it. You can stop.

        • Ceefax says:

          All right thinking Christians hate her as well, for her bastardisation and cynical exploitation of their religion. If I heard someone use my God in the way she does, saying that we have to build a pipeline for such and such a company because it’s “God’s will” I’d be livid.

  32. tb says:

    Actually if you examine the skin tones in both pictures (including the man in the background) neither head and neck match the rest of the body tones;

    both Elizabeth’s and Sarah’s face and neck are darker and different toned than the body, and you can see a line that ends at the base of the neck.

    So where does this leave us ? Actually the “Elizabeth” picture looks more fake than
    “Sarah” to me

  33. Sure you can… and this one was.

  34. Skuzzoh says:

    Who’s to say they didn’t put that girl’s head over Sarah Palin?

    • Kate Wetherall says:

      YESS!!!!! Good point Skuzzoh! Exactally! You’re right!
      HAHAHA!!

      • May says:

        Uh-hu. Ya right “Katie.” Palin probably doesnt’ go to beach anywaz. look for girlz pic on enternet anywaz.
        May Wright

        • Kate Wetherall says:

          May,
          Do not call me katie. call me kate or the great kate weather machine. and do not think i am saying my name is the one of mysteryous benedict society. it is my real name.
          Kate

  35. eddiepscetti says:

    “I got it on eBay!”

  36. Pacifus says:

    Political Talk:

    You’re doing it wrong

  37. anim13 says:

    OMG! and I was REALLY excited for a second there til i doubled check for any statement saying about it being photoshopped…wah!

  38. Joe says:

    Haha look at everyone on both sides get all worked up. You could put ANYONES face on it and its funny. Try imagining Biden’s face on it, still funny. Or try First Lady Bush’s face on it, still funny. It cracks me up how people can spend so much time sweating such little things. I;m gonna keep laughing at these comments, they are almost as funny as the pictures.

  39. Chewybunny says:

    Fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap

    waitaminoot…dey got pools in Alaska? Iz frozen?

  40. Bob Tallon says:

    Did you ever hear of being up shit’s creek without a paddle. Well I think we are there now. And I hope who ever gets in can work toward getting a paddle . That modifies all the corporate and banking hubris and greed of the past 30 years. If we do not redirect and change direction, we are in for a long hard road. Even with a change it is still a long hard road. I do not give a rats ass who gets in I will vote my conscience and pray for us all.

  41. Wah-ooo says:

    THIS IS GREAT!!!!!!



Your Comment

 

 

Search





Get Daily Lol News Emails

Enter your email address:


RSS Lol News Feed


  • Recent Comments

    Dongsun on …and then we tweaked it …
    Kyouchou Budgie on Be the worst president of the…
    Jane St.Clair on AT&T – More bars in …
    Ceefax on Pentagon launches $200 million…
    Zib on Be the worst president of the…
    Igor the Vigorous on …I wanted this
    Igor the Vigorous on …I wanted this
    Igor the Vigorous on Pentagon launches $200 million…
    Igor the Vigorous on Pentagon launches $200 million…
    Igor the Vigorous on Pentagon launches $200 million…
  • Tag Cloud

  • The National Archives

  • Most Popular Pictures

  • Even More Lulz

 

Quick Sprout