There’s no mistake
There’s no mistake, sir. These are all your supporters
(Condoleeza Rice & George W. Bush)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption:
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous TEXAS | Trollop Next »
» 112 Comments
-
Recent Comments
Ash on 50. cals and an ipod Eddie the Floydist on Vladurday: My name? bad fairie on Vladurday: My name? flodnak on Vladurday: My name? Eddie the Floydist on Vladurday: My name? n00bs on TIANANMEN SQUARE mej on Vladurday: My name? n00bs on TIANANMEN SQUARE kg333 on Vladurday: My name? Eddie the Floydist on TIANANMEN SQUARE 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Grassroots support. He haz it.
I disagree with almost everything you say, but…
COMMENT WIN
That really was a *great* comment.
Are you sure it’s not ass-roots?
whatever, Beavis
Wow- the Obamabots are getting desperate…
They’re really trying hard to make sure Bush doesn’t win in November.
LMAO… No, wait, are they really ?
I want to nominate my vag for president. She didn’t win four years ago last time she ran, but then again, neither did Bush, really….but she would do a really good job
A win for Bush is a win for your vag, no?
And vice-versa.
Can we please not bring anyone’s vag into this, ever again?
Oh thank you Jane for saying that.
What if it’s just referring to the 1967 Vaguar that I drive?
Um more like they’re maybe trying to make a joke. On a humour site of all places. I figured you’d just be glad it’s not a ‘bush is dumb’ joke.
But good christians don’t make/like jokes. And humor sites are for the non-patriotic.
Let’s go make an Americana quilt!
u mean McCain? they are easily confused, both old and stupid
*Looks around* Who mentioned Obama? Just because you dislike Bush doesn’t mean you’re an Obama supporter. Met quite a few at the bar the other day
McCain pulled ahead in the polling today…
The shine is starting to come off the false Messiah.
So you’re referring to a half black man as “shine”? FOR SHAME!
lol wut
That about sums it up, and I think he knows it too.
Of course, depends on where you look. I’ve seen a poll that said that McCain is gaining, but hasn’t caught up yet. Remember the early primaries. I want a job as a pollster! I could phone it in!
The poll that actually has McCain in front is from the highly unreliable Zogby outfit, so I’m not popping the champagne cork just yet.
But all the polls show the same trend — Obama’s lead decreasing over the past month, to the point where it’s small or nonexistent. This is good news for McCain and very bad for Obama. Considering the general political climate, any Democratic candidate could be expected to have a double digit lead at this point.
Cause Obama is bein a pusy about this ellection. He compliments McCain instead of attacking him, all Obama needs a a attack add with the clip where McCain wants 100 years in Iraq, and Obama wins
But since it doesn’t exist…..
I haven’t seen any such ads because I don’t live in the USA, but (based on what you said alone) it sounds to me like Obama is doing what all politicians should be doing. That is, supporting his own policies rather than attacking others.
Modern politics and elections are filled with too much slander.
What policies? Remember Kerry had a “secret plan” to win in Iraq? Still waiting to hear it…
Obama’s “policies” are the same…
I don’t know what the policies are, since I have little reason to research them.
Doesn’t matter. Obama changes his policies every day, and it’s all lies anyway.
And all McCain has to mention is “Sleeper” and he wins
So Iraq can turn into our friends over in Afghanistan. We fight to liberate a country that is being apressed, by some force that as no right to be in power,
reguardless of our reasons we can’t just leave that country to is own vises.
We leave and those people will kill each other until some religous right comes in and takes power, and 20 years later we’ll be fighting an new mujajadein.
If that is the only reason Obama has a shot at winning, fuck this I am going to Canada and socialized medicine. Before we create the newest fundamentalist muslim state, by leaving before the in fighting has stopped.
“These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world… and then we fucked up the endgame. ” to quote Charlie Wilson
Hmm, I love this gag, especially the “grass-roots” implications mentioned above, but… seriously… the bastard doesn’t even have the support of a few stems of dead grass left.
Any man who shits on the Constitution and whose sole selling point is the combination of “Smears, fears, and queers” should be relegated to talk radio. It’s no wonder the nation’s turned on him.
He turned on us first.
Wonder why those weeds are dead? Bush has been the Rid-X to the nourishing ideological and moral roots of this nation. His politics are antithetical to the progress of a healthy democracy.
But his eight years are almost up. Now if we can just get him to be put on trial as he oughta be, instead of being pardoned or ignored like those goddamn villains Reagan and Nixon…
George Bush has a higher approval rating than the Democratic Congress.
A fact often overlooked by his ignorant enemies.
I wouldn’t call myself an ally of Bush, but I knew that. I’m not the biggest fan of Congress, that’s for sure.
No, it’s not overlooked (well some people might, but they’re not worth mentioning). However, what IS sometimes overlooked is that the majority the Democrats have is so small it might as well be dead even. They don’t have the numbers to get anything major done, and they know that even if they passed something all the President has to do is veto it, and they certainly don’t have the two-thirds needed to override a veto. Basically all they’ve really been able to do is sit there and stagnate and let a bad situation get worse, which doesn’t help them when it gets time to vote in November.
BLASPHEMER!!!
How dare you bring truth and reason here? Don’t you go spouting your “numbers” and “facts” on this site missy!
Truth and reason are the bane of the Socalists… um… I mean Democrates.
True, because Republicans and conservatives , in general, have absolutly no connection with truth or reason.
And the Liberals do? Since when?
It’s politics. Neither side does.
Cause Repubplicans are assholes, Democrats are pusies, and both of them act pretty dumb
I really wouldn’t be calling anyone dumb my friend, not unless you take this post and the one you did a little further up on the page and ran them through a spelling and grammer check. Alas, there is not a moron check you can also run it through, so we’ll just have to go with what we can.
Tag! Nice one Jane..
i dont exactly try my hardest to get spellin/grammer right on internet, i simply dont care if its right, as long as my point gets across
But your point may carry more weight if you didn’t come across as ignorant.
another dumb one. Making fun of Bush got old a long time ago when the liberals wore it out
another great one. Making fun of Bush gets better every time the neocons complain about it
nope. definitely gets worse when retards like you have free speach on the internet
*speech
Free speachs?! Awesome, Speachs happen to be my favorite fruit!
Oooo- Not too fond of that First Amendment, are you ?
Maybe he’s annoyed that people like me can post when I don’t have the Bill of Rights to guarantee free speech. Yet somehow, free speech is there for me all the same.
Don’t worry, with the Unreasonable search and seizure and Cruel and Unusual punishment clauses already out the window, Free speech is without a doubt not far from the chopping block. The constitution? lolwut? The Bush administration wiped their asses with it long ago while those failbots in congress wimpered like impotent idiots.
Must be one of the Bush supporters … Wire tap all them Libs!
Does anyone ever support Congress? I think the last time that happened is July 1974 when they convinced Pres Nixon to resign, even then it didn’t last long. Pres Bush (current), on the other hand would have more support, I suppose, if he had any pissed away all shreds of his integrity. The Piรฑata thing is stupid. However, take a break on the woe is me… you mean ol liberals are always picking on us — when did conservatives become such candy-asses?
Change any for not and sign me up for grammer class
Yeah but we cant fire back or we’re called intolerant.
And when we take the first shot we’re either libtards or obamabots. I guess we’re just expected to sit here and listen quietly to whatever the cons have to say.
Oh, I don’t mind a little heat, but aren’t you conservative’s suppossed to be rough and tough little cowboy He-ro types?
stereo type! no, we believe in self reliance and personal responsibility although cowboys and heros are cool
Who doesn’t believe in self-reliance and personal responsibility? The difference is in how both sides approach those core values.
in simpler words, we don’t believe in the government giving us stuff…
so your second sentence is correct!
Hi honey how are you today?
Hi sweetie!
Which in the classical and technical sense, is actually liberal thinking. Economic liberty in not needing the support of the government.
Which *isn’t* the Democrat Party. *sigh*
So true. I’m just pointing out that people like Ema and EP like to
attack ‘liberals’ for things that are distinctly not liberal. It would be far more accurate to call these ‘liberals’ Democrats instead.
Here in Australia, the major right wing party is the Liberal Party. The Liberal Party here agrees with most of the policy points of the Republican Party.
Really? That’s interesting… Do you have a two party system? What do your “conservatives” believe, if you have those?
From furthest left to furthest right, our major(-ish) parties are:
Greens, Democrats, Labor, [center], Liberal, National, Family First
From most votes at the last federal election to least:
Labor (43%), Liberal (37%), Greens (8%), National (5%),
Family First (2%), Democrats (1%)
More details can be found on Wikipedia: Australian_federal_election,_2007#Results
.
The Liberal Party _is_ the conservatives. Their actual liberal policies are limited to economic policies (much similar to Republicans).
If we want to refer to social liberalism, then we have to qualify it with the term “small l liberal”.
And people thought American Politics was convoluted! I can’t vote here, but I wouldn’t have voted for Rudd!
It’s not that bad. What most people do is just pick the party they agree with most and tick the box next to their name. It is almost certainly the minority which carefully order their preferences themselves.
The rough correlation in votes, is that if you vote Republican, then you would either vote Liberal or National (it make no difference since
they team up in the end anyway). If you vote Democrat, then you would either vote Labor or Greens here, depending on how far left you considered yourself.
.
A major advantage of how we do things, is that we don’t vote for the President or other leader with all sorts of political powers. We just vote for
who will represent us locally, and they represent the area for three years.
But don’t you vote for PM?
Technically, we vote for the party. And whichever party has the most members/seats gets their pick for PM. It is like a better version of the electoral college, where we don’t lump states together and those who we elect aren’t irrelevant as soon as we know who is PM.
Also, that PM is like a figurehead. He doesn’t really have any greater powers than any other elected minister, of any party.
It’s almost as confusing as AFL! *Go Cats!*
Don’t diss Aussie Rules. Because it is certainly a better sport than the multi-man wrestling match you call football.
*Go Blues* (even though they can’t make the finals any more)
Except when you want the government to use its military to guarantee chea poil and freebie contracts for your corporation, or to save your sub-prime inv/fested bank from bankruptcy, or to strong-arm weaker foreign governments into buying up dollars in order to avoid your inflation..
So what is wrong with that?
Are you sure about that? I think that conservatives want more and bigger handouts for their special causes than the liberals do, and more importantly, conservatives want even less personal accountability. For example, business, and while I can cite examples across the board, lets say sports — how many pro sports teams extort public funds to build venues under the threat of a move — talk about mult-million dollar welfare for a couple of rich sports owners. How about corporate execs that run multiple corporations into the ground, taking their golden parachutes only to do it again, where is the personal responsibility ther? So once again, while chastising me for a general statement you employed an even more general one to tell me that I was wrong. What you are really doing is casting judgement on liberals because rightly or wrongly they want to help those who fall out on the less fortunate side of the pay scale, while conservatives, rightly or wrongly support business that do the same. Again, sme value, different application.
Well, it’s probably more efficient to use government resources to help businesses which provide jobs and keeps the economy from collapsing sending people into the streets and ruining 401k accounts. I bet keeping sports venues in a community helps local economies. I do give generously to charities of *my* choice and I encourage others to give as well. The government taking my money and doing what they decide is going to help people with it does not make me comfortable at all. I don’t believe leaving things like that to the government to decide is being responsible. CEO salaries and perks do seem outrageous but so do salaries for sports stars or Hollywood types, I don’t know what can be done about that in a free country.
Come on Ema, how is it that the government takes your money, making you uncomfortable, yet they are still be more efficient because in their “wisdom” they can pick the exact business that keeps us poor smucks alive? You cannot have it both ways. You said conservatives don’t believe in government giving them stuff, but you don’t mind giving really rich sports club owners stuff, because they may “provide” jobs. Personal Opinion — Business’s do not “provide” jobs, they simply exchange money for services that the owners prefer not to do themselves so they hire the BS out and try to make more money selling the services than actually doing them.
it’s not that hard to figure out which businesses provide the jobs or keep the economy afloat so investments like 401k’s do not fail. Do you have a retirement account? Want to depend on social security? I don’t, I would like to have it grow and be worth something someday. Is there corruption in business, of course there is! There will always be, but there is also corruption in the government especially when big money is involved. Business does not provide jobs? Who does??
No, businesses do not “provide” jobs. Business owners have an idea, they don’t want to actually make it happen, so they pay someone else to do the work. They make money in the difference between what they pay the worker, the cost of doing business and what they can charge the consumer. And guess what, investments are not a guarantee — why do you think that social security was invented to begin with? It was invented because private investment for retirement failed. It was a scam that we went through once before — result? The Great Depression. That is one of my main points. Back to the beginning of this interesting deviation, most liberals and conservatives believe in self relience and personal responsiblity. We differ in how we apply the principles.
I see so you’re saying businesses provide an income and something to do with your time between oh say 8 to 5, security for your family and maybe some insurance… but that’s not a job? I dissagree…
Ema, he was disagreeing with your use of the word ‘provide’ because he sees it with charitable applications. Perhaps he would be happier if you used the word ‘create’ instead, because I cannot see any argument or other way to twist the words there.
Fine, I’m not attached to that word…
Heros are cool, unlucky, but cool nonetheless!
why unlucky? they are heros and by definition they win
This is the easy response…True heros are cool because they do what must be done because it is exactly what must be done. They are unlucky because they are the ones stuck in that position, but they are cool because even though it sucks, they go ahead and do it anyway.
I like this answer! You are correct, but I think doing what must be done is its own reward – again the win!
I love this. You saying that ‘they do what they must because they can’.
Sounds like Aperture Science, yay!
quite possibly the dumbest thing i’ve ever read?
you get win for that.
Republicans have made a brand out of calling Dems whiners and crybabies – they are supposed to be stoic, heros and cowboys.
Most of the whining I see now if from the other side though. Must be the aging population – when SOME people get older they tend to get crotchety and think they should have everything their way and be given a pass on manners and sharing.
**Qualified that with SOME since I don’t want the angst.
PS – MCCAIN IS OLD
Ageist!!
Kind of like Al Gore in 2000? I just hate to think what’s going to happen when Obama loses. You think things got ugly when Gore lost?
I find it ammusing that you automatically assume Obama is going to lose just because you don’t like him.
that’s why they play the games
And you’re assuming Obama is going to win because you don’t like McCain? I miss your point.
Oh, and when was the last time anyone other then a Democrat went crying to the Supreme Court because they lost? Do you know?
give it a rest. there is too much mud from both sides of that stuppidity to continue to drag it up. The real deal…we changed government without fighting and blood in the sttreets, somethoing many countries can;t say.
CF, I don’t recall a time, except for ‘68, when there was blood in the street over a Presidential Election. But, you have to admit, 2000 was not a good year in terms of elections. As disingenious as you may think I’m being, the old saying still applies, “Those who forget their history are doomed to relive it.”
The only justice Bush et al will ever see is a bullet
As for McBush vs. Obama, well…if Obama ever had a chance…it’s sad to say but the feds would have him knocked off in a heart-beat -_-
Hail to the Revolution!
Wow, totally understandable why you would be anon.. what a wankstain in every sense of the word.
Another hate-filled liberal with murderous intent.
Desperation breeds contempt I guess.
Somebody sent death threats and white powder to two McCain campaign offices a couple of days ago.
Bush took Gore.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html
Bush is a Republican.
So the term clear as mud would most likely confuse you.
nature supports. yaaaay
Better support than the Senate