you be america
you be america you be iraq i’ll fuck you both
(Misty May-Treanor, George W. Bush & Kerri Walsh)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: Luminarsi
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous Scaramouche | Did ya hear Next »
» 181 Comments
-
Recent Comments
jim on TIANANMEN SQUARE slaggingham on TIANANMEN SQUARE jim on TIANANMEN SQUARE pittypat on TIANANMEN SQUARE jim on TIANANMEN SQUARE creaturefeature on TIANANMEN SQUARE pittypat on SCIENCE Russian on TIANANMEN SQUARE pittypat on SCIENCE dves on TIANANMEN SQUARE 
Cheezburger Network Blog
Clinton who?
LOL! This is great!
?
I find it more Vulgar then anything else.
It’s also stupid.
That means it’s a typical Bush-bashing left wing LOL!
you two should get a room and express your nazi-like man-love in private. oh noes the freepers are getting boners!
LOL, godwinned.
heh
I’m sorry but it’s bad taste, I may be easily entertained in some areas, but here my sense of humor is more sophisticated. The corn picture was a good touch, but I could write this one……
‘hurr hurr, If I fuck both of you people will laugh and it’ll be like I fucked Iraq’ the fact that people are entertained by vulgarity of this pathetic level (sometimes swearing is funny/necessary) means your humor is not that sophisticate…
I don’t think the obscenity was the funny part….
Pretty sure the analogy was so aweful it was just ignored.
Apparently you didn’t get the point at all. And you won’t until at least
you turn 13, around 5 years from now.
Oop you got me, I’m 8. You’re so funny haha
I have no time to waste arguing with you on the internet.
So just explain to me, a stupid 8 year old with a key board, what the point of this is.
“I have no time to waste arguing with you on the internet.”
Sooooooooooooo, what the FUX you doin here, dude?
Making a huge long argument rtard, it takes 5 seconds to write things like this.
your mom must be very proud.
Yeah…..well….you’re just jealous that I have a mom.
After reading some of Trainwreck Chaser’s comments, it seems he’s probably under the age of 15, a right-winger, a huge faggot, and likes to pretend he’s smart and sophisticated.
Your “sophistication” bit is blow to pieces just by your bad grammar and bad spelling. But on top of that, you try to make a joke about somebody not having a mother.
You epically fail, kid.
Um… you ignorant loser….how did Bush fuck anyone? Or maybe i am just blinded by the fact that there hasnt been an attack on US soil since Bush took office.
Err… what was 9/11? Some people seem to have very selective memories.
Could be cause it’s hard to tell where he was when everything was going down…
yep, definitely blinded by SOMETHING.
You are the dumbest person I’ve ever seen.
Hasn’t been an attack on US soil?
Idiot.
Yeah!
Humor is not something that needs to be sophisticated. Saying so just makes you look like an ass. It’s ok to find it vulgar, but just because someone else finds it funny does not make them unsophisticated. Prat.
You should have read the other post, I find it funny at times, but this is just rediculously pathetically not funny.
Prat? Okay cabron.
I thought it was funny.
If you don’t want to pick your fights, don’t start them.
You’re only making matters worse.
So please. Take your little internet drama somewhere else.
you need to work on your grammar before you become sophisticated.
I dunno I am left-wing and I thought this was tasteless.
I agree. I am most definately not a fan of Bush and have no problems with vulgarity, but this one just isn’t funny. Now, if a Clinton joke was worked into the picture somehow, it would make more since, since he is known for his little sexual adventure
omg, bill clinton and monica lewinsky, now THERE’S timely, sophisticated humor. wow.
WIN!
Question is, what’s the story behind the photo? I mean, what the hell is he doing?
I puzzled over that one a long time. It sorta looks like he is comparing something on his palm with a tattoo on Misty May’s lower back.
OR She had some sort of bug on her and Bush offered to smack it away.
OR they are involved in some odd foreplay.
Dunno, really.
Bush was talking with the two volleyball players. One bent over and offered to let him spank her. He gave her a pat on the lower back instead.
That’s what I gather from the 32578249652387 news stories on this happening, anyway. There’s a war in Georgia and Russia, and all we can do is go ‘lol spankings’.
So are Georgia and Alabama duelling banjos or what’s their problem?
I don’t understand Russian, but on Pravda, they mentioned something about a fiddle made of gold…
Dueling banjos? Paddle faster!!
Squeel like a piggy!
The Devil went down to Georgia and said ‘Dasvedanya, comrade’.
Sigh… it just goes to show even the devil will result to tanks and violence when he can’t win by sheer talent
Foreplay, or as the republicans call it “Campaigning”.
And the democrats call it “Gangpaigning”. Same difference.
Stop both of you, I shouldn’t get excited at work.
LOL this will have the freepers in a twist. funny as hell though and accurate!
yawn.
As much as I despise Bush, I agree it is a little more vulgar than funny.
Yeah.. it’s the sort of picture that one pretends is funny, based on ideological sympathies.
Like Obama eating a hot dog, right?
No, that was actually very funny.
…yeah, actually.
No, that was actually funny.
Actually, this picture is funny. It’s the caption that is not-so-much. Whereas with the hot-dog one, the picture wasn’t funny, but the caption *was*. Kinda like opposites.
I admit, I have to agree. Much as it makes me ill to be pro Bush on anything (oh Jellybeans, I now understand your pain) I think this is unnecessarily crass, not to mention objectifying women. I don’t like it when their side demeans Mrs. Obama so I’m not going to play the hypocrite and pretend that this is okay. Of course, that’s just my opinion, enough people must have thought it was funny and voted it up here so… *shrugs*
actually, I’m starting to be a tad suspicious of what IS making the front page… I know I’ve seen and voted for much funnier LOLs than what’s been put up since the start of the Olympics… mebee tha ‘Burgerz are trying to be topical or something…. apart from that, what “Jane Says” (okay, now I gotta dig out some of my Perry and boys….)
Oh that’s funny, I didn’t even consider my name tying into other songs, I picked it because I’m a Barenaked Ladies fan!
i LOVE bnl!!!
How dare a douchenozzle be consistent in thought! I applaud your efforts. However, Ms. Obama does bring (or at least has in the past brought a lot of criticism on herself. Now where is the Whitey video?
I have no problem with criticism of her actions, politics, and beliefs if you have issues with those. However you must admit that in an attempt to be funny many criticisms of Michele Obama have also been demeaning to women in general. I also felt the same way towards Hilary Clinton’s campaign. Disagree with her politics, fine, but gender biased remarks set all women back. All these reasons are why I (personal opinion here, don’t freak out people) don’t care for this lol. For one thing, as it was mentioned earlier, say what you will about Bush but so far he has never had a hint of sexual scandal that I know of, which sort of makes this lol pointless. Also, in it’s attempt to be funny it is objectifying these two young ladies, and that is unfair, in my opinion.
I hear what you are saying. I try to stick to the issues, but sometimes (not in this particular lol) that fact that they are women makes it funny, where it would not if it were a man. I think as long as the lol is at least a little bit driven by issues, then it is fair game. And Hillary brought it on herself when she started talking about people liking Obama more cause America is sexist. She ran a horrible campaign. Horrible.
Oh no doubt about it, she fought dirty, I don’t deny it. However I was more talking about the media’s treatment of her long before she and Obama went head to head, and even before she ran for president. The same attitudes and behaviors that are generally accepted in male politicians had her labeled as a bitch, and that is something most women deal with on an everday basis. Be too upfront in the workplace, show your opinions and back them up with facts and you’re just asking for that bitch label.
And I agree with you, I’m not saying that for all womenkind we should always be serious and never poke fun at ourselves, I just meant that some things on both sides of the fence have gone over the line, and we shouldn’t be so enmeshed in our party politics that we see one side and not the other.
For those who are wondering, this exchange is what an “intelligent discussion” looks like. Notice the recognition given to one another’s ideas, and a lack of bashing. If you hamfisted jackbooted nazi conservatives and we free loving hippie commie liberals could discuss things that way more often, we *might* actually be able to pull this country out of its problems.
Maybe if you didn’t call us hamfisted jackbooted nazi’s, it would work better too. But good point.
no ‘ needed in the pluralization of nazis.
Man, I totally had this long reply to this earlier, where the hell did it go. I don’t want to reply again in case it double posts and I can’t remember all of it. Damn you PK!
I feelz your pain!! (wait- a little more to the left you say? Oh, there it is )
Hey it showed up! Glad I resisted the impulse to post again.
We’re glad too.
Because bending over for the president to smack your bottom/back isn’t objectifying yourself?
thank you! This Crotchwaffle appreciates you douchenozzles.
watch your language young man. it is not appropriate for an 8 year old to be spouting such profanity. stick to the classics such as sh*t, f*ck, and d*mn. Then when you turn thirteen you can use everything else
Ha, my bad
ROFL ROFL ROFL ROFL
I love it.
shouldn’t this be under a warning link or something.. i was under the impression this website typically tried to stay all-age appropriate
Here’s your warning: If you let your children look at anything on the Internet without checking it out first, you FAIL as a parent.
How’d that work out for you?
Well, you’re completely correct, ReTARDIS. The illusion of anonymity is enough to absolve us all from personal responsibility for our actions. No matter what we post, there should be nothing to prevent its viewing. Right?
If a place claims to be for a certain age group, it ought to take steps to ensure it is appropriate for that group. I wouldn’t expect to see a picture of GW in a porn site. Why should the F-bomb get dropped without consequences in a place that advertises safety for the entire family.
Or maybe “personal responsibility” is just a four-letter word now.
hey, i surf the web all the time without my parent’s permission and they’re not failures. don’t you insult my parents like that!
They are failures if they complain about what you see when they have the power to stop you.
Precisely!! It is a level of vulgarity that does NOT belong on this website, unless it is behind an age appropriate link.
Why come here and cry about it? Yell at the webmaster. Most of us don’t have brooms shoved so far up our asses that it bothers us.
your name…. all I can think is the “Ding Fries are Done” guy doing the “Doctor Who” theme….
Haven’t we seen enough of this crapweasel in here? NEW MATERIAL!
Probably the most ignorant, trashy and disrespectful Ive seen in a long time.
People are just brainwashed.
Mostly it’s the libtards who are brainwashed.
Google “Bush Derangement Syndrome”.
One could turn that around:
“Mostly it’s the conservatards who are brainwashed.
Google: Bush Idiot Iraq Treason.
(note – I have not actually googled that, but I predict it has exactly as much useful information to say about Bush as your Google search does).
Actually, people who see Bush clearly and understand just how bad he is and has been are MORE able to think for themselves and less likely to require others to do their thinking for them. Unlike myopic neocons.
Well, I guess we will just have to take your opinion as fact. You do not even qualify as a douchenozzle. You are just a plain old douchebag. Jane, now there is a fine example of a douchenozzle. You have been judged and found lacking. In other words, YOU SUCK.
Your support of Bush clearly shows you lack judgment. To be found lacking by anyone who supports such a treasonous ape is a high compliment. There aren’t two sides to this debate, and the truth is not somewhere in the middle. Bush is the worst, most treasonous president we’ve ever had, and history will vindicate that judgment.
SETH, haven’t seen you in awhile! As much as you hate us, we love you.
I think if I googled BDS I could find Seth’s real name.
I think if you Googled ‘wankstain’ you find his name as well. Seth, I’ll bet you were one of those (if you’re old enough) who said that Clinton didn’t do anything wrong by having numerous affairs. Aside from perjuring himself before a Congressional Committee, I guess putting the Office of President (and yes, Nixon was guilty as well) under the label of self-serving is fine. If you believe that, you have no right to call Bush anything but Mr. President.
One had sex and lied about it the other lied in order to invade another nation leading to the deaths of thousands and the enrichment of his cronies.
I can think of a few names other than Mr. President which would work, can’t you?
While I don’t agree with the war in Iraq, at least we’re rid of someone who practiced genocide, infanticide, chemical warfare and a whole host of other crimes. But hey, I guess it’s ok that someone wanted to completely eliminate an ethnic race, yes? Maybe the war in Iraq was contrived, but I think that country is a better place without that lunatic. But again, wankstain thinking (read Liberal) probably doesn’t see it that way.
Ha ha. Wankstain. That is a new one for me. Nice.
*bows* I just thought it was time to get past crotchwaffle and douchnozzle.
This comment has nothing to do with Bush, but with Cynics statement of opinion as fact. And Seth (AKA Asshat), you are dead wrong. There are two sides of the debate and the truth IS somewhere in the middle. You, a representative of the left (a poor one at that) should embrace the idea that there are certainly enough things to fault the man for but that there are things he had done well. I never said I support Bush, whim I kind of find lacking in many ways. But there goes seth, pulling Obama’s balls out of his mouth long enough to make broad sweeping judgement about what I believe. I have never once said that Bush is fantastic. I have been FAIR. Remember what that was, you kindergarted teacher probably told you about it last year. Here is the definition of treason: Treason is any attempt to overthrow the government or impair the well-being of a state to which one owes allegiance; the crime of giving aid or comfort to the enemies of one’s government. If you truly believe, under all of your bluster, that he is treasonous, then I would label you the same. I would argue that your labeling him as treasonous is giving our enemies true aid and comfort. Not because he is great, but because nothing he has done or not done can be truly labeled as treasonous. That is so serious an accusation, I do not think you understand what you are saying. Tim McVeigh was treasonous, the Rosenbergs were treasonous, Bush is not. I could make that same claim (just as preposterously) about Carter and his gutting the miliraty and the CIA, Clinton and his gutting the military, Kennedy and Johnson for getting us into WWII, Roosevelt for burdening every future generation with a welfare system that is nothing more than an overrated ponsi scheme. But that would be silly and irresponsible. Just as silly and irresponsible as you are being. He may be the worst president, and history may bear that out. I do not think that will happen. Not with the likes of Carter in the anals of the oval office. That is my opinion on it. Now, you have been judged and found, once again, to be a dumbfuck mouthpiece for the far left. You are to the left what EP is to the right. In other words, YOU SUCK and ARE AN IDIOT.
Asscrack, I am responding to the inaccuracies and judgements in his statement. First, Bush did not start out as a neocon but became one, unfortunately, after 9/11. Before Bush took office, he had a policy of avoiding things like nationbuilding, which he has done now. A true neocon is far closer to a liberal than a true conservative. That his how they got their name. They are neo (new) because they had been democrats. They switched to conservatives because they felt that strong national security was more (the most) important than domestic social affairs. As for you, I suggest you look for a definition of treasonous. It is a serious claim. In a nutshell, it is giving aid and comfort to the enemy. I could label you thst for speaking against our country’s policies (I am not, because that would be just as silly.). I could say Roosevelt is guilty for saddling us with a welfare system that is nothing but a government-sanctioned pyramid scheme, I could say Kennedy and Johnson are guilty because they got us into Vietnam, I could say Carter is guilty for gutting the CIA and miliitary, and I could say Clinton is guilty for gutting the military. I would never do that, because treason is so very serious to the strength of a democracy and nothing Bush has done, right or wrong, rises to that level. None of this is a defense of Bush, only a defense of fairness, which is something you must have failed to learn in kindergarten.
TL;dr
Still glad to see you again.
I am dumb, your not seth, read that way to fast…
EP would you give the conspiracy a rest? Everything is not always down the line left vs. right. Many of the commenters have said that they are no supporters of Bush but yet still found this to be in bad taste, that has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with personal morality.
So why come in here to bitch? Why not contact the webmaster and cry?
Well you certainly live up to your name. I never said it should be removed, in fact if you were able to read (although my doubts as to your ability to do so grows by the minute) you would have seen that earlier when I said I didn’t like it I followed it with the statement that obviously a lot of people thought it was funny otherwise it wouldn’t be here. I was giving MY opinion that I did not care for it, which is what the message boards are designed for. In addition to that I was giving MY opinion that this picture has nothing to do with left vs. right. The only one I see crying here is you.
Hands burn cream to ReTARDIS
Disrespectful? Darn right! Goofball deserves no respect.
Umm – what about the two ladies? Did they deserve something this vulgar?
I have to agree with Wendy here.. the women in this pic have been grossly objectified.
As a lady, I’m tired of any little joke called out as being sexist or demeaning or an objectification of women. This caption is a hypothetical situation in which the author has nothing against these women. The author is pointing out how absurdly lecherous the commander in chief seemed in these series of photos and made the correlation of *ahem* screwing individuals and screwing entire countries.
How are we going to make it, ladies, if we don’t develop some thick skin?!
Now, where’s the beefcake? Maybe I’ll look at the Putin picture again
Do you also think that women make the same as men in the workforce and so there’s no need to keep fighting that fight? The fact that the only pupose these women serve in the context of the picture is as potential sex partners is what is demeaning. It disregards any athletic achievement these women have made and simplifies them to “hot girls in bikinis”. Women are overwhelmingly portrayed in pop culture as sex objects and we are never going to make it, ladies, if we continue to think this is okay.
It would definitely help them to be taken more seriously if they had more clothes on though, although I do agree with you about the demeaning part.
This is one little snippet… and it says more about Bush than it does about the two athletes. Would you still find it offensive if it were Bush leering or behaving like a creep around two shirtless guys? In my opinion, the joke would work the same. I think you have to try really hard to look past the humor and only see what you find negative. This isn’t going out of its way to perpetuate a stereotype.
See, now you’re putting me in the position to defend Bush, which is going to make my dinner come back up. The thing is, Bush wouldn’t be leering at those girls if society wasn’t set up to make them think it was okay to ask a world leader to smack their ass! That is what I’m trying to say, we look at something like this and we say, it’s all in fun, it’s just a joke but then women, especially young women, grow up seeing “jokes” like this and they think that kind of behavior is okay. My mother would have had a heart attack if she heard that I asked the president of our country to smack me on the ass.
But, as you said, she asked him to do it. I think she actually probably saw it more as a power trip: and effective way to make one of the most powerful men in the world extremely uncomfortable
I say, if she is comfortable with it, no harm, no foul. When it comes down to it, we choose how we conduct ourselves… you can’t change how anyone else does. Give the girl some credit! I like to think she’s being a powerful woman, not a victim of society.
A “powerful” woman doesn’t willing make herself into nothing more than a sexual plaything. If you really think that then I think you’ve just proven my point.
It’s a smack on the butt… she’s not asking him to do her! She’s dictating how far things go. Playthings don’t have a say. And I don’t think she’s made herself into nothing more than a sexual plaything. She’s a great athlete. This is a nuance of her personality. I don’t think she’d give herself that label, nor would most people. I think the one who sees her that way is you.
Obviously the author of this caption saw her that way too, so you can’t just say it’s only me. And you really think it is okay for a women to ask the president of our country to smack her on the butt, really?
I wouldn’t do it myself, but that’s because I can’t imagine I’d be comfortable being that close to him. I believe in a woman’s right to make choices!
Um, is that really your call to make? Can’t a woman decide for herself if she is a sexual plaything, ninja, CEO, etc? I find your suggestion offensive to the idea of freedom of expression for women by trying to shoe horn them into what roles YOU expect them to fit into.
She asked for her ass slapped and he went for the back instead. Good for him, she still asked for the swat. Let her decide if she wants to be sexually viewed or not.
I think you are busy trying to establish a new stereotype instead of actually letting women make a choice. Perhaps you are the one needing to self evaluate.
One more thing, you also don’t see any of the male athletes trying similar “power trips”. That is because any meeting the male athletes may have had with Bush probably accorded him the respect he deserves because of his office (if not the man, of which I don’t have a lot of respect for) without stripping themselves down to their lowest most base forms of their sexuality.
Again, she drew the line. It’s a smack on the butt. And this is a man who was chest bumping military graduates. This is the man many elected because they wanted to have a beer with him. This guy can’t be taken to seriously I think. A person sets a precedent for how he wants to be treated by his actions.
Hey, I have never been and will never be his greatest supporter. I have voted against him in every election he has ran and I disagree with his politics and many of the actions he has taken on behalf of the american people. However, my mother taught me that one person’s bad behavior is no excuse for your own. I think Misty May-Treanor and Kerri Walsh are amazing athletes who have accomplished a lot. As such they are representatives of our country to the rest of the world. I don’t think asking a guy to smack you on the butt is a huge big deal. I DO think that when you are representing your country in the Olympics and you ask the President to smack you on the butt for all the world to see than yes, you demean yourself and women’s rights takes a step backward.
I tend not to agree. I think everyone sees it as her action alone and is not likely to throw all women in a group because of her. I don’t think having seen this will make my bosses smack my butt or expect me to offer my butt to them. And because she did it doesn’t mean I will offer my butt to anyone. One action, one decision… and we get to bid Bush adieu in January! We’re all gonna be okay
I’m not saying that because of her actions all women are going to automatically say, “well, I guess I’ll just go ahead and sleep with my boss now because he says I can keep my job that way.” What I am saying is that we as a society see one incident like this and we say hey that’s no big deal. Then we see another and we say that’s no big deal either and every time we say it’s no big deal we open the door for more and more acceptance of this behavior. In the end I’m not so worried about you or me, but when my eight year old niece sees this and thinks this is acceptable behavior because her mom thinks like you do, that it’s no big deal, then when she grows up and starts going to parties in high school and college, she enters the work force, she’ll expect to be treated this way.
I think you were exposed to the same society as most and you turned out fine
I was raised in an extremely conservative household and shielded from this stuff growing up. Yet, I haven’t adhered to everything I was taught. We all learn to think for ourselves. I think with the proper discussions, your niece will probably be none the worse for this, either.
I’m trying to use individual cases to illustrate larger points here. I had a mother that, due to certain childhood experiences, made it a point to raise a daughter that had respect for herself. My niece and myself are lucky in that we have a supportive family, but with many girls that’s not the case. I’m certainly not advocating censorship either, what I am saying is that such a general flippant attitude of acceptance hurts us in the long run.
Oh, and btw, in case it’s not clear I’m actually really enjoying this debate even when it’s clear we’re not going to agree!
It’s a case of just agreeing to disagree. We have different perception filters. I must say, you were a worthy adversary
I hope others may learn from our exchange that people can have adult discussions and not just melt into a puddle of name calling drivel. Rock on!
haha… you wrote that reply as I was writing mine… even if we disagree, we’re on a similar wave length
dude, meet Jane! That’s the way she is.
I am just curious why she is trying to establish a new stereotype based off her world view instead of letting women decide for themselves what they want to be.
It isn’t the parodical analogy that’s the problem, it’s the level of vulgarity to achieve it. You yourself used the word “screw”. For THIS site and setting, that’s OK. But, the other word, knowing there are people of all age groups coming here to view LOLs, it would have been best keeping for one’s personal folder to share with friends.
Oh, I respect that. Personally, I don’t understand why a younger person would even be interested in PK at all since many wouldn’t get some of the jokes, and perhaps that’s why it’s not under an age restricted link. *shrugs* But, yes, I can see what you’re saying.
I thought it was vulgar and highly undignified how he was behaving. He is supposed to be a head of state and he is acting like a middle schooler. There is no reason to overlook that.
Like Clinton and Monica?
Clinton was an idiot, but he kept it in private (or under the table, as it were). Bush has ALWAYS acted like a middle-schooler. He’s not completely through puberty yet. Can’t you tell the way his voice cracks when he talks? But, this is definitely beyond good taste. Had they said “screw”, then maybe. Same meaning, less vulgarity.
That lady asked him to smack her on the behind, she asked him. He tapped her on the small of the back with the back of his hand, how is that being vulgar? What do you think most men would have done in that situation? How can anyone say he was behaving vulgar? I’m sure there were plenty of people trying to trip him up and catch it on film, that to me is vulgarity.
He could have declined and/or said, “Thank you, but that’s highly inappropriate.”
However, I doubt he would have known what the word “inappropriate” means, let alone how to pronounce it.
Well, what would you have done? You weren’t there, he may have actually said no at first but she may have insisted. What was he going to do? Run screaming to Laura?
The vulgarity wasn’t in the photo. The vulgarity was in the caption, or did you fail to see that.
I wasn’t even talking to you, I was talking to Angela above.
Hmm… No me gusta. For o so many reasons
Man. Kerri Walsh’s legs just dont stop. Hot.
For once, we agree!!!!!
I love how this comment follows the long arguement about sexism and feminism ideals. *applauds*
What do you expect from someone completely out of touch with reality?
A vote for Obama.
Me.
Rather you. Saying that Bush ended the war….hilarious, I was suprised I could keep my coke from my pc screen.
Since we still have servicemen on duty in Germany, Japan and Korea and those servicemen still die, does this mean that WWII and Korea never ended?
Now if you say that the population are no longer hostile to the Americans there, I would invite you to visit the Marine Corps base on Okinawa, Any of the former bases in the Philippines or attend and anti-American rally in Germany.
And don’t even get me started on the American and North Korean snipers in the DMZ…
This caused me GR8LULZ.
“I thought it was vulgar and highly undignified how he was behaving. He is supposed to be a head of state and he is acting like a middle schooler. There is no reason to overlook that.”
haha…good one…how about when everyone complains when Clinton gets sucked off…but Bush (as direct head of the armed forces) is responsible for tens of thousands of middle eastern civilian deaths. There really is NO reason to overlook that! This also caused me GR8LULZ!
We’ve had way too many humans as president.
The biggest non-political differences are age and shade?
Puhhleaze, boorrriiinnggg.
I, Fluffy Mcfluffenstein, am too running for president. Vote for err…semi-happiness, vote for a cat, vote for Fluffy.
I don’t think we should be at war. I mean, seriously, why the hell would you attack Iraq for that crap? It’s like attacking a mouse cause it has teeth. Why not attack all the other mice too? Dogs have teeth too, attack them! Oh wait…we have teeth.
SO WTF?
The economy is in terrible shape. Imagine how good it would be if it was only dependent on the cat food industry? Life would be better for no apparent reason.
John Mccain is an old douche.
Barack Obama is…well…not me.
Ralph Nader — meh, nobody needs to worry about Ralph and his 2 voters.
Ron Paul – his name should be Lame Borington.
Mike Huckabee – You say huckabee, I say vomit! Huckabee! Go Vomit! Eww, a hairball.
Hilary Clinton – Anti-cat.
Pug Mcmuttenstein – Who would vote for a dog?
Fluffy ‘08
I have been watching the last few days, and you should stick to the lolcat page. Your not cut out for this. There are the edgy comments, the funny comments, the educated comment…and then there’s you. Your comments fall under the pathetic attempt catagory. Watching you try to be edgy, funny, or educated has made me feel embarassed for you. You parrot opinions, and you try to be funny while you do it. There are others on this site that so the same thing, but you lack the creativity and communication skills to pull it off. Go home Fluffy.
This is just extremely vulgar – and I can’t stand the guy. I have to wonder why he’s allowed to interfere with the athletes (don’t see him around any of the men), but this has no place in this site. I hope it’s removed – and SOON!
Vulgar? It just says “Fuck”.
If you don’t want kids to hear that word, then put ear plugs and blindfolds on every kid on earth cause they’re gonna discover that word from the next person that passes them.
There is a difference between knowing the word and using it without thought or class. Forgive these parents who are actually trying to teach their kids how to clean up their small corner of the world. If we each do that, then the world will be cleaner.
Personally, I happen to agree with Wendy. This site is supposed to be a “family”-style site. We don’t need the sexual innuendo nor do we need the vulgarity. After all, profanity is the last refuge of the scoundrel.
And the author of the caption is NOT Han Solo.
It does not just say Fuck. It uses the term in its most base form. The other uses, such as “What the fuck?”, Where the fuck?, Fuck this noise, get the fuck outta here, who the fuck, how the fuck, fuck me, why the fuck, fuckstick, limp fuck, Well fuck me softly, and my personal favorite, “”Fucking-A,” are all examples of using the word that are less crass than using the word in route to objectifying the women in question. Screw would have been a better choice by far. So, to conclude, fuck this, I’m fuckin outta here. For now. Fuck.
Look at the guy in the back that is like, “oh shit I gotta take a picture of this!”
Vulgar? All it contains is the word “fuck”, no sign of nudity, anything. Wierd prudish folk around here…
Anyway, what I find much more odd, is why the hรฉll that girl is standing like that next to Bush. Her face says a lot as well.
I wasn’t being prudish. I simply don’t think the word is appropriate for this site. I recaptioned the photo with: “You be Russia, you be Georgia…………….CAN SOMEONE BRING US SOME MUD OVER HERE?!??” You can have fun with the photo without using certain terminologies. And, NOT be prudish!
Might be a little vulgar for some but the analogie is profondly accurate.
Only if you’re profoundly brainwashed by leftist propaganda.
So i guess I’m profoundly brainwashed by evidence, facts and logic.
Leftist propaganda is not evidence, facts or logic.
You’re right, to me it isn’t but to any right-wing nut case, facts and evidence are leftist propaganda.
You really should get out of your mom’s basement more often. You could use some sun.
I think Evil Pundit has somehow found an auto reply feature on here… with a choice of responses that uses a clever combination from its database of words, such as: left-wing, leftist, propaganda, nuts, brainwashed
Really, so much less work he must do!
DUDE!!!! You just stumbled on it!!!!
Zombie Mouthpiece (aka “Evil” Pundit) is…..
……a BOT!!!!
AAAaaaahhhh! That makes a lot of sense! and teh BOT triggers when certain individuals post something!! Thanks, fillerbunny; you solved that mystery!
It’s only profoundly inaccurate if you have been sitting with your eyes closed, fingers in your ears, crying la la la la la la la for the past EIGHT years. The word STILL could have not been used, though.
So vulgar, yet so true.
Wow, another attempt at masturbatory humor by our ever so clever left wing members.
That’s right – most of the right wing is too busy building bridges to nowhere, accepting cash bonuses for “jobs well done”, flirting with pages, toe-tapping in airport restrooms and ordering massages from male escorts to be bothered with tongue-in-cheek humor. I mean, they are, after all, the epitome of morality and sexual decorum!
Only when compared to Democrats, Wendy, and that is saying a lot.
*elected Democrats.
Spankz me Mr. Prewzident! I sai Spankz me gud!
You know, it’d likely be a completely different, and less generally obnoxious, caption, with generally the same meaning, if the politician in the photo had been Bill Clinton…
WIN. EPIC WIN.
Um….Still, the fact that dear Prez Shrubbery is blantantly staring at her ass…
What normal male isn’t ?
Um…she’s not really that hot…I think porn would be a lot more efficient.
I can’t believe this made the front page… last I checked this was in the negatives… and it’s insanely vulgar and obscene… not funny.
um….. wth????
(yawn) The Libs call Repubs hateful.. yet, everytime, it’s the Republican photos ripped apart with vile, hateful comments… while the Dems get the nicey-nice “Oh, look I’m cool” and “Don’tcha wanna vote for me!” softball treatment. It’s very much in evidence here.
When you kids grow up and learn how to think on your own, instead of following the marching orders of your movie and rock stars, and their bosses in the Democrat Party – support this guy/tear down that guy – you’ll see how foolish you were.
OMG what is with all the democrats always bashing on the republicans???? it will make me sound like an ignorant little kid but THIS IS STUPID WHY CANT WE GET ALONG!!! plus that is probably the most disgusting caption ever. no offense but the person who captioned that needs serious help and needs to do something better with their LIFE!!