Comments on: Dear Lord,

By: Evil Pundit's Evil Twin Brother

Evil Pundit's Evil Twin Brother — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:22:57 +0000

I am forced to agree with you. The apocalypse is coming.
What does Jesse Jackson saying that we must neuter our politicians have to do with this!?!?

By: Mutta

Mutta — Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:45:17 +0000

Thank you

By: Jpers36

Jpers36 — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:12:33 +0000

Photo is by Chuck Berman for the Chicago Tribune.

By: Jpers36

Jpers36 — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 15:11:28 +0000

And here’s the original with attribution: http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/health/chi-rush-cancer-free-web-aug05,0,7981908.story

By: Jane

Jane — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:59:20 +0000

ouch, and I’m not even a dude.

By: Trainwreck Chaser

Trainwreck Chaser — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 03:06:16 +0000

Those bastards.

By: Free2B

Free2B — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:45:23 +0000

Yes, he was forced to resign. He wrote a book all about it that I highly suggest you never read.

By: Free2B

Free2B — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:38:53 +0000

I claim no side, no party (you can’t fly with only a right or only a left wing). You present a fallacious argument. You cannot claim that an evil man who has acted hypocritically against a set of morals makes anyone who follows that set of morals a hypocrit. It makes no logical sense. It is not the fault of the ideal, if the ideal was never persued. It is the fault of that truely evil man, and anyone who defends him. If the Republican party, as a unit, defends him then they are guilty. The people involved and responsible for any sentance less than life imprisonment, castration, or death are also quilty. But, you can not blame a group of people for the sins of the one who claims an association.

By: hueydoc

hueydoc — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 22:58:46 +0000

Castrate with a weedeater….

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Sat, 09 Aug 2008 03:54:44 +0000

totally agreed. Our guys may be hound dog douche bags but they aren’t criminals parading around on high horses.

By: Evil Pundit

Evil Pundit — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 23:09:02 +0000

Or Ted Kennedy?

By: EF-AH-GEE

EF-AH-GEE — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:46:08 +0000

Of course what you say makes perfect sense, that is if you completely discount an unborn babies right to be considered human. Yes it is unspeakably horrible that someone would become pregnant as the result of a rape. But does that mean we condemn the innocent baby to an unspeakably horrible death by abortion. Rape used to be a capitol offense crime, but we became too “”civilized” to put the offenders to death for their crimes. But now we put the unborn children to death in ways that no semi-civilized nation would do to the most heinous of murders.
The only way someone can justify abortion is to ignore science and try to pretend that a “fetus” is not a human being. Which any honest, thinking human being cannot believe for a second.

By: lowly grunt

lowly grunt — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:20:06 +0000

You mean like Larry Craig?

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:58:07 +0000

for the record – I would be the first in line to vote against partial birth abortions and abortions as “birth control” I don’t think however that the mother’s life should be less important than the baby’s or that victims should have to carry the children of their attackers.
I think in cases of rape and incest the mother should have a choice.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:55:10 +0000

So .. no marriage for agnostics?
Freedom of religion?
If more parents actually taught their children about sex and consequences there would be fewer abortions.
Women should have the right to chose what they do with their bodies. Sometimes that right is taken away as in this little girl’s case. Would you honestly condemn a 14 year old rape victim to a life of misery by making her carry that child? Sorry Becky, no future for you. I guess you should have been a good girl and not gotten yourself raped.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:15:12 +0000

Republicans are not against sex ed, they disagree about who should be doing the educating. Why are we going to let school systems that fail to teach elementary math and english teach about sex? As far as gay rights, I would argue that Gays have extra-equal rights in terms of protection under hate crimes legislation. Marriage is not a right under law, it is a privelege. I cannot marry whomever I want to either. Marriage is granted as a right only by certain states and several churches. Want to make things better all the way? Get government out of the marriage business all together and let people’s churches decide. All legal issues should be handled through contract law. And we Republicans must apologize for fighting for babies’ rights more than we do women’s rights. I wish that Dems would consider babies’ rights once in a while. I cannot believe they get away with hating babies the way they do.

By: ema

ema — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:13:07 +0000

Just because a person does not live up to the rules, does not make the rules bad, or others who claim to want to live by the rules bad. Also, I would like to see some details of the case, who and how the sentence was decided by, etc. I am not sure at all the light sentence had anything to do with his party affiliations. I still think it is wrong what he did even if she was consenting I would think it wrong.

By: steve

steve — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:08:16 +0000

Actually, all complaining about “McCain is old” and “Bush is Dumb” jokes aside, the Republicans by and large have been happy to, once again, sit by and let the Douchnozzles continually shoot themselves in the foot.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:06:38 +0000

You are missing my point here though Ema – your party in general are against Sex ed, Gay rights and Women’s rights (in so far as abortion and birth control are concerned). So far your party officials have been caught in situations involving gay airport sex, gay underage solicitation for sex and raping a minor.
To add insult to injury this rapist is not charged with statutory rape or with rape at all. He is charged with a class C felony and will be softballed on the sentence.
Yay for Republican morals!!!

By: steve

steve — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:04:32 +0000

So because one does it, that means the point is wrong? Hardly. Republicans do claim the moral high ground. The result of the claim is that when one does something wrong, they are forced to resign. The result of Democrats constantly avoiding any sense of morality is that when they do something they shrug their shoulders, say “What did you expect?!”, and pretend like nothing happened.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:02:04 +0000

From you guys? maybe.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:01:37 +0000

Lifetime = Republican propaganda.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:00:49 +0000

Some in less than 7 years! I bet he gets house arrest.

By: Trainwreck Chaser

Trainwreck Chaser — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:39:23 +0000

ANyone see the add below this (may have changed) that endorses ‘John McCain’ and it isn’t the current McCain running?

I’m guessing the name John and Jon play a significant difference here, but if not, FAIL!!

By: Trainwreck Chaser

Trainwreck Chaser — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:37:48 +0000

I honestly believe that those who molest underage children need castration. But I am not a law maker so my opinion doesn’t matter.

By: Trainwreck Chaser

Trainwreck Chaser — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:34:09 +0000

You…since you did type first.

By: ema

ema — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:32:57 +0000

Democrats are against the death penalty and killers routinely get out of jail and rape and kill children again.

By: hergieburbur

hergieburbur — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:03:28 +0000

Adblock fail?

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:54:23 +0000

She wants to protect the nuts of her husband? Or if she wants grandkids she will need to protect the nuts of her sons?

By: Jane

Jane — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:53:16 +0000

We have to claim Bill Clinton too, however when politicians engage in sexual acts I would rather they be with consenting adults, even if they are interns and hookers.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:52:03 +0000

It is a “republican” issue because your party tries to claim some sort of moral high-ground on sexual issues but then your elected officials are the ones breaking all these highminded ideals.
This baby raper signed a bill toughening sentencing for sex crimes against children – he gets “not to exceed 7 years or $5,000″?
Your party is against gay marriage and pretty much gays in general and yet 2 of your officials have been busted in lurid gay sex scandals including soliciting teenagers.
Your party is full of hypocrites it seems.

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:48:57 +0000

Ah but the laws seem to go more gently for some … less than 7 years for raping a 14 year old?

By: Phaelin

Phaelin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:45:09 +0000

Quite possibly. Unless the mother was like EVERY SINGLE MOTHER ON LIFETIME. Then it’d be loved no matter what. ._.

By: Phaelin

Phaelin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:43:31 +0000

penis!

By: Phaelin

Phaelin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:42:59 +0000

OHNOES SELLOUTS

By: Phaelin

Phaelin — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:41:02 +0000

Tiz the point. It’s just funny. =P

By: ema

ema — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:59:12 +0000

Exactly, it has nothing to do with Republicans or Democrats, there are assholes in BOTH parties, also we have laws that take care of these things.

By: Evil Pundit

Evil Pundit — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:52:17 +0000

I don’t see what this has to do with Republicans, though.

It’s just a smear. Expect a lot more as Obama slips in the polls.

By: ema

ema — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:47:59 +0000

ANYONE that rapes a 14 year old should be shot. First neutered, then shot.

By: ema

ema — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:46:32 +0000

Obama has a thin lead in the polls and Hillary is demanding her supporters be counted at the covention – bad news for Obama. Expect more shreaking…

By: Evil Pundit

Evil Pundit — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:34:06 +0000

No, this is my response when a libtard goes hysterical for no apparent reason.

By: Seth

Seth — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:22:30 +0000

That’s your response when one of yours rapes a 14 year old? Are your TRYING to earn the name ‘Repug?’ I guess defending the indefensible is what you do best, and you’ve got plenty of practice.

By: Evil Pundit

Evil Pundit — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:01:25 +0000

Take your meds and lie down.

By: Kroenen

Kroenen — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:57:33 +0000

not to mention that the kid’s life would be hell. he’d be a social outcast and even his mother would hate him

By: Kroenen

Kroenen — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:54:13 +0000

seriosly. who wants to 1)get raped 2)find out they’re pregnent 3)find out they can’t stop said pregnancy!

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:49:58 +0000

oops – Eliiott Spitzer was one of ours … OK, I claim the hookers but you get the gay airport sex, rape and child solicitation of the pages.

By: Kroenen

Kroenen — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:49:05 +0000

what, you haven’t noticed?

By: Kroenen

Kroenen — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:48:26 +0000

bad joke WIN

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:47:43 +0000

PS – Baby killing? Oh, you mean abortions?
Is it more evil to prevent a baby of rape than to commit the rape in the first place?

By: jellybeans

jellybeans — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:46:31 +0000

You can talk about democrats having no morals? Seriously?
You have one guy caught soliciting sex in an airport bathroom.
One guy using the page system as a dating service (starting when they are underage)
One guy getting caught with hookers on the tax payer’s dime
The new guy raped a 14 year old …
Thank GOD Democrats don’t share your morals.