reflex to check
reflex to check for wallet & credit cards not suppressed
(Ehud Olmert & Barack Obama)
picture: dunno source, via our lol builder. lol caption: myprecious
Show Only: Democrats | Republicans | Media | Military
« Previous OH MY GOD! | In communist society… Next »
» 111 comments
-
Recent Comments
Classicist the Zappa… on Get of your ba12348 on Let’s imagine the look o… paws4thot on Get of your The Steve on TRAIN ORIGAMI pittypat on KINDNESS pittypat on KINDNESS Rando the Filthiest,… on TRAIN ORIGAMI Rando the Filthiest,… on Get of your n10bettes on TRAIN ORIGAMI Rando the Filthiest,… on Get of your 
Cheezburger Network Blog
woot first next poster is gh3y
You bet ya! ”winks”
Why would you suppress that reflex? The guy’s a liberal. He’s always aiming for your wallet.
You exhibit ignorance of the highest caliber. The republicans are the ones who want to take your wallet and give it to the rich.
P.S. I don’t mean conservatives, I mean republicans, there’s a difference now.
This one actually made me lol.
tru dat
It’s funny because stupid white people are prejudiced and think black people always steal things. It isn’t making fun of Obama at all, so I can’t understand why you think it’s funny. Oh, it’s because you are stupid and thought it was saying Obama is going to pinch the nation’s wallet? I see. Well, you know, raising taxes is always better than just raising spending and making our kids pay for it like the Repugs do.
It isn’t making fun of Obama!! It isn’t!! Stop lauging I say!!
Here’s something that will cheer you up.
I heard that McCain is OLD! HAW HAW HAW!
Funny how stereotypes are just fine with you, when they’re applied to Republicans.
Unless you’re referring to previous posts from Seth, you do of course realize that’s not any better. Filthy partyist.
wow … thanks for the racism, pal.
Well spotted!
Bad Seth, making racist comments about white people.
No, no, making racist about white people *being* racist is enough of a departure from “traditional” racism that it can be considered a joke *about* racism as opposed to a racist joke. The PC movement won’t catch on to that for two years, at least.
It’s a joke…on the white guy for supposedly having an inappropriate defensive, racist reaction to being in proximity with a black man. Comprehension fail. Over-developed defense mechanism and racism win. Hey, that makes it an irony win!
And, in case anyone thinks there’s a difference, Prime Minister Olmert is ethnically Jewish.
(I am ashamed to say that I did not recognise him at first >.<)
Uh, it’s implying Olmert is subconsciously racist, that’s all.
Why? Is he buying lunch? I don’t get it.
Nope. ‘cuz ‘Bama is lookin’ out for your wallet, but not in a GOOD way.
Because he is black?
I think that’s the idea.
hmm… I s’pose one would think that, if one were a racist…
so….. either : (1) you see a black face and think “criminal” or (2) you see a white face and think “that guy must think all black men are criminals”?
Both (1) and (2) are racist concepts…
Makes it an interesting social experiment. Who found it funny, for what reason? There are obviously two different camps of translation. I would love to take this to the street.
I found it funny. It’s like a huge “Yep, this is what happens every day” for black people – more ironic since ya’know, Obama is a Presidential candidate. Sort of sad too, though. It reminded me of this one “The Awful Truth” ep where M.M. gave black people day glo orange wallets just so the cops wouldn’t shoot them for “mistaking” the wallets as guns.
You are pathetic.
Oh, save the rich old white dudes, they are so downtrodden!
The caption was fairly obvious and trying to paint everyone with your brush isn’t going to work for anyone but the fanatical cronies you and EP seem to have built up … or created.
It’s implying all the old white guys are still fundamentally racist, even if they pretend they are not.
You forgot to all-cap OLD.
As in:
Obama is black and McCain is OLD – which of these descriptors will most adversely affect performance?
Reply: As with sexual intercourse; the presidency will be adversely affected by the advanced age of the subject in question not the race or ethnicity.
Yes, “sexual intercourse” is exactly what Obama will do to the country if he gets in!
please it regularly for four years?
So you are saying that is what George Bush did?
No, Bush anally raped the country for eight years, roughly, without lube. There’s a big difference. I think its sad how a small minority of people are so stubborn they can’t admit they were wrong to support the man. Being able to admit when you made a mistake is a large part of being an adult. Go ahead, admit you made a mistake by supporting Bush. We won’t ridicule you for it, and you will feel so much better without all that cognitive dissonance interfering with your thought process.
Well I know he anally raped the terrorists who want us dead – he gets major points for that.
Really? You KNOW this? Or you saw the media report the capture and deaths of people labeled as terrorists? I am not saying they are or they aren’t, but people seem to forget that a lot of these “terrorists who want us dead” are pissed because we invaded their homeland, and would have been perfectly fine leaving us alone if we had stayed out of there. We created a lot of our own problems over there with Shrubs foreign policy.
I don’t think Iraq caused 9/11.
And if we’re referring to Israel, that was long before, and not just the US.
Also, ema probably got one of those dirty pop-ups with the pics – you know, Bush giving a peace sign to the camera while… well… dammit. *pokes out mind’s eye*
Hmm, no comprendo Larrikin – do these pop-ups exist? I know I have been seeing some wild ads on this site…
“Well I know he anally raped the terrorists who want us dead” -ema
A sight gag that I’d never want to see. That help? *gag*
It seems to me that we all see what the media wants us to see. We don’t get to see the good that we’ve done either. And I’m not talking about the emails that get passed around with all of the pictures and patriotic words and music. I mean the stuff that isn’t controversial. And what about the televised beheadings of Americans? I guess it wasn’t terrorists that were performing those, huh? Or how about when they flew planes into buildings here in our homeland? That wasn’t terrorists, right? As much as I dislike how Bush has handled his second term, if he didn’t do anything after 9/11, he would have gotten raked across the coals. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.
Actually, if you read my post clearly, you would see that I did NOT say that none of them are terrorists, NOR did I say that we’ve done no good there. I ALSO didn’t say anything about 9/11 (how many of them were Iraqi BTW?) I merely said not all of them are terrorists, some of them are just trying to defend their homeland (regardless of how despicable their methods) from an invading force. And once again, though I know I will never get an answer, exactly what did Iraq have to do with 9/11? You can make that argument for afghanistan (where I think we should be), but not for Iraq. Iraq is about two things: Money (both oil money and defense spending), and revenge. Its that simple.
How much more good could we have done spending those billions elsewhere, like on education or healthcare?
Amen. I am quite certain that the money spent on the war could have found a cure for AIDS as well as cancer. And if not a cure, then certainly some very excellent treatment.
If I had a ‘ruler’ of any type killing off millions of the populace, I’d count myself lucky to have someone step in and help.
Sorry to be pedantic Larrikin – but where do you get this idea that ‘millions’ of people were dying under Saddam’s rule? Correct me if I’m wrong but I’m under the impression that Iraq, while corrupt, was doing much better under his rule than they are now. We (and by ‘we’ I mean your laughably ridiculous president and our brown-nosing, yellow bellied PM) single handedly went into that country, for no understandable or justifiable reason, and tore out their infrastructure, thereby allowing two factions/tribes/political parties (call them what you will) to rise up and start tearing their own country to shreds. And need I remind you that it was the West that gave Saddam his power in the first place?
If you’re going to try to be all high and mighty about how magnanimous we are for ‘liberating’ the Iraqis, please first explain to me why we have not also stepped in to help to ‘liberate’ all the other countries of the world that have corrupt leaders and suffering populaces (i.e. Zimbabwe). Oh yea, it’s because they don’t have any oil.
Aren’t the Iraqis ‘lucky’.
Zero were Iraqi. Iraq was no more responsible for September 11 than Turkey, or Japan or Italy.
Most of them were Saudi Arabian.
You don’d hear anything about all the ‘good’ that you’ve done because (and here’s the shocker) YOU HAVEN’T DONE ANYONE ANY GOOD. Yea so a few hundred american and british soldiers have ‘given their lives for the greater good’ but what about all the tens of thousands of Iraqi men, women and children who have died? I bet you never hear about that on FOX news.
Literally LOL.
(To Seth’s metaphor)
You mean eight
At least he will be young enough to do it without chemical enhancement … or a tiny forklift.
Not important to me how the president does or does not have sex… It could be said that younger candidates would be better off with a less stressing occupatons, they may have their minds on other things when there are important decisions to be made, if you know what I mean…
And it will be more of the same that we’ve had if McCain is elected, only on a smaller scale.
I want something different.
heehee … smaller
… Ok, I am 12
Unfortunately for you (and all of us, for that matter), nothing ‘different’ is being offered this campaign – just the same-old politics. *sigh*
Kind of a mean generalization don’t you think? I’m surprised at PK for letting this one through, they are usually so good at censoring things like this.
I LOVE IT.
Because you also think all black men want to rob you?
Well, perhaps just this one? I don’t necessarily agree with this picture, and was surprised that it got onto the front page, but not _everything_ is a generalisation.
Also, don’t you usually keep your credit cards _in_ your wallet? So… why would you have to check both?…
Not funny
Yes, yes… making fun of your magical overlord is very bad.
K THX BYE
I dislike him and have donated and volunteered for McCain actually.
But naturally you must assume someone is biased if they disagree with your sense of humor.
Funny…
WilliamCA
LMFAO!
He’s a politician. Any sane person, after meeting a politician, WOULD be checking for their wallet & credit cards…..
Now here’s a interpretation I like!
And he’s a Lawyer ! Definitely check for the wallet.
“In my left pocket I keep one testicle of the American President. In my right pocket, I hide the irony about relegating people of a different race to certain walled-off sections of land patrolled by soldiers. That’s how we roll.”
I guess if Obama gets in, Jesse Jackson can help him out with the left pocket thing…
omg I love you!
what different race? they are the same race, they differ in ideology.
Gitmo – the “NEW” Japanese internment camps.
At least we were smart enough to have it outsourced to Cuba?
Um….. you do comprehend the difference between terrorists caught on a battlefield trying to blow other people up…. and the rounding up of thousands of US citizens based solely on ethnicity…. right?
Your “clever” comment ain’t so clever, there, Chester.
Um, not all of the “terrorists” at Gitmo were caught on a battlefield trying to blow other people up. In fact, the USA gave a bounty to any Pakistani who turned in anyone else for being a “terrorist.” In other words, Ubamo Q Muhammad was GIVEN MONEY BY THE US to turn in his next-door neighbor, Ahmed T Mandvi, for “terrorist acts” even though Ahmed may have never done anything at all. And now Ahmed is stuck at Gitmo without the ability to protest his illegal incarceration, and without being allowed to talk to his family or a lawyer.
Luckily, it appears that this is starting to change, that alleged terrorists are being allowed to challenge their detention now.
Brilliant.
The funny thing is that it is Obama who should be checking his wallet around that guy.
I LOLed. Actually, Obama’s biggest worry was passing security at Ben Gurion airport: having Hussein as his middle name must have kept him there for hours.
I like how the people who think it is Anti-Obama are like NOOO NOT FUNNY YOU CANT MAKE FUN OF TEH OBAMA. But the people who realize it’s actually a “white people are all racist” lol actually find it funny.
Heh. I thought it was pretty good myself. But then, myself and my friends that are various minorities always get on each other about these stereotypes pretty hardcore.
It’s funny how people can actually explain the joke, but you’ll STILL get people not understanding it.
We have to take our anti-Obama jokes where we can find them around here…
It’s not anti-Obama. It’s making a funny against Israel’s (very Jewish) prime minister.
Right, but some have interpreted it as a joke against Obama because he will be taking our money in new taxes if he is elected, so hide your wallet. Hey, it’s all we got…
Funny thing, though…. if there is even a shred of doubt as to whether Obama is being made fun of, lotsa Obama followers howl anyway.
no kidding, but we are not allowed to make a peep when Bush or McCain are attacked on a regular basis.
Oh please, you’re all wrong. The white guy is describing the man-boobs reduction surgery he had a while back.
Now that is an interpretation we can all embrace. Moobs for Big-Tittied Bob in ‘08!
I voted for some of those, I saw much better captions for this.
Naw, he actually had his eyelids lifted.
Wait…Obama is black?
This changes -everything-.
If anyone is stealing anyone’s wallet, it’s McCain’s tax policy ideas. Unless you make more than 600,000 a year. In which case, he’s your BEST friend.
Everyone else kinda gets it in the shorts.
My caption for this one (in my head) was something along the lines of Molly Shannon’s character from Superstar. The one that stuffs her hands in her armpits, then smells them. Yeah. That’s all I had.
Don’t be silly; McCain hasn’t proposed tax hikes for anyone; Obama has.
Actually … he has clearly stated the income tax hikes are NOT off the table in an effort to shore up social security. He is pulling a Bush SR. and saying no new taxes then saying … well, ok … maybe some new taxes but please don’t call me on that.
There’s a subtle level of of jew joke in this too if you look at it right. I’m thinkin this one get’s sent off to my fave Terrorist!
It has a little something for everyone!
Obama : uniting racists of all nations!
Maybe he’ll buy the world a coke.
Well, the racist world.
Always check your pockets when you meet a corrupt Chicago politician.
exactamundo
Chicago? I could name a few hundred other cities that applies to. In fact, you can probably just ditch corrupt as well, its redundant. And Yes, I know the point you were trying to make.
That’s nice, but Chicago has a “proud” longstanding tradition as a leader in the field of theivin’ politicians.
… ya gotta honor it!
It’s funny cause Olmert (the white dude next to Obama) is a bigger thief than all of Harlem put together
Um……. “Harlem”, Gracie?
He and his countrymen are the thieves of the life of Palestine. http://www.ifamericansknew.org
Palestine? I haven’t heard of such a country….
Does it have a currency? A land? A goverenment?
Palestine is a term the Romans used to describe a region of the middle east under their rule. It never described a race of people or a culture.
Not if Israel has anything to say about it!
Such irony.
It’s the Palestinian leaders who are solely responsible for the lack of a Palestinian state. If they stopped trying to kill all the Jews they could have their own country tomorrow.
Palestinian leaders have only started gaining any kind of influence on the political landscape around there in the past few decades.. which they’ve used to faction up and kill each other, of course.
But no, if the zionists hadn’t done back-room deals with the Hashemites and the Brits, there might have conceivably been an Arab-Palestinian state for the past 60 years, alongside a Jewish-Palestinian one.
As things stand now, if Palestinians just sat back and stopped their armed resistance, they’d probably have to look for a new place to live tomorrow.
Oh, and by the way, Jews were calling this place Palestine, too, as late as the ’50s.
The only real mistake is the one from which we learn nothing.JohnPowellJohn Powell
“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newpapers.” Thomas Jefferson
I guess if Obama does not win, he can start his own cult ?
This is pretty funny, I loled. I don’t know why some people are making such a fuss over this, I mean its okay and funny to show Bush as a natzi but this is completely unacceptable!? It’s just a joke, lighten up!
IT’S A BLACK JOKE DAMNIT!
-_-;;
Is that the Israeli bitch?