<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weekly Recount</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/</link>
	<description>Lol News and political photos including Barack Obama, Sarah Palin, John McCain, Joe Biden and more Politicians like you&#039;ve never laughed at before.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MaMaQ</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-203813</link>
		<dc:creator>MaMaQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-203813</guid>
		<description>Ah - but to those of us mere end-users who don&#039;t live here but love a good laugh...   
-- And who have seen both Red Sox fans AND Gay Pride marchers...  

Thank you.  My Monday is brighter and my smirk is happier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah &#8211; but to those of us mere end-users who don&#8217;t live here but love a good laugh&#8230;<br />
&#8211; And who have seen both Red Sox fans AND Gay Pride marchers&#8230;  </p>
<p>Thank you.  My Monday is brighter and my smirk is happier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danbala</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-129585</link>
		<dc:creator>Danbala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-129585</guid>
		<description>Congrats!
You have, in my opinion, written the funniest PunditKitchen comment this week (so far).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats!<br />
You have, in my opinion, written the funniest PunditKitchen comment this week (so far).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neutral</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-129582</link>
		<dc:creator>neutral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-129582</guid>
		<description>Congrats.  You guys have turned what is supposed to be light fun into a politcal debate. Please grow up and get over yourselves.  Nobody cares about your political opinion and I really don&#039;t want to have to scroll through a billion comments to get to someone who actually commented on the PICTURES.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats.  You guys have turned what is supposed to be light fun into a politcal debate. Please grow up and get over yourselves.  Nobody cares about your political opinion and I really don&#8217;t want to have to scroll through a billion comments to get to someone who actually commented on the PICTURES.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-15131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-15131</guid>
		<description>It says that half of the voting populace is in the bottom half of human intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It says that half of the voting populace is in the bottom half of human intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flantastic</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-13806</link>
		<dc:creator>flantastic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-13806</guid>
		<description>does it count if the election was rigged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does it count if the election was rigged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-13220</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-13220</guid>
		<description>Nice of you to put in the effort.

However, your analysis does not invalidate either of the points I made:

That Bush beat Kerry, receiving the greatest number of votes of any President, ever. This is still true in terms of absolute numbers.

More importantly, it shows that Seth&#039;s ‘everyone hates Bush’ theory fails miserably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice of you to put in the effort.</p>
<p>However, your analysis does not invalidate either of the points I made:</p>
<p>That Bush beat Kerry, receiving the greatest number of votes of any President, ever. This is still true in terms of absolute numbers.</p>
<p>More importantly, it shows that Seth&#8217;s ‘everyone hates Bush’ theory fails miserably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Locke</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-13214</link>
		<dc:creator>Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-13214</guid>
		<description>It seems the old saying is true: Statistics don&#039;t lie, but liars use statistics.
In actuality, absolute numbers of votes only tell part of the story in any election. At least two other factors, percentage of popular votes received and percentage of electoral votes recieved, must be included in order to accurately report the results of an election. Since I&#039;m only evaluating Evil Pundit&#039;s statement about vote totals, I&#039;ll confine my investigatoin to the absolute numbers and the percent of popular votes.
In 2004, Bush did indeed receive 62 million votes, and that number is in fact the &#039;greatest number of votes of any President.&#039; This is all the more impressive since the previous election George W. Bush only carried 50 million. He must have been quite popular, especially considering his 2000 result blew Clinton&#039;s 1996 total of 47 million right out of the water. There appears to be a trend developing here. Let&#039;s think about this for a moment.
Between 1992 and 2004 every elected president won more votes than his predecessor. Clearly that means that in this timeframe each elected president was mor popular than his predecessor (even if that predecessor was himself). Right?
The percentages seem to tell a different story. Lets first look at the previous record holder, Ronald Regan. In 1984 he carried 54 million votes. Undoubtedly a respectable number, but certainly less than Bush&#039;s &#039;04 total of 62 million. But which of these two men was the more popular candidate? Bush beat Kerry by 2.46% of the popular vote in 2004, whereas Reagan beat Mondale by 18.2%. How to explain the descrepancy? Simple: populaiton growth. The CIA world factbook estimates US populaiton growth at .88% annually. This number fluctuates from year to year, but has remained consistently in the positive. If we assume .88% annual growth compunded annually, we will see a population increase of roughly 3.57% over 4 years. This means that every election will have a higher absolute population than the election prior to it. While this does not result in a 1:1 increase in the voting populatoin, we would expect to see some increase in the voting population nonetheless. So it seems rather logical to conclude that the observed trend of absolute numbers of votes for elected presidents increaasing over time is positively correleated to the increase in population over time. Put simply, there are more votes because, in part, there are more people alive that are capable of voting. 
In fact, Bush&#039;s margin of victory in 2004 is decidedly on the low end. In the last 24 years, 6 full election cycles from 2004, only one contest has been decided by a narrower margin: The 2000 election was decided by .51% of the vote...in favor of Mr. Gore.
I realize that I&#039;m weeks behind in this post, and it will likely remain unread. However I can&#039;t abide would-be pundits posting skewed statistics in an attempt to dupe readers into subscribing to their philosophy, especially when said pundit has repeatedly encouraged posters to &#039;look it up and put it all together&#039;. As if the rest of us are somehow incapable of comprehending complex political situations. As if only he has the mental fortitude to sift through media bias and find &#039;the truth&#039;. And notwithstanding the fact that the bulk of his posts rely on cheap rhetoric and statistics which are, themselves, either skewed or misrepresented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the old saying is true: Statistics don&#8217;t lie, but liars use statistics.<br />
In actuality, absolute numbers of votes only tell part of the story in any election. At least two other factors, percentage of popular votes received and percentage of electoral votes recieved, must be included in order to accurately report the results of an election. Since I&#8217;m only evaluating Evil Pundit&#8217;s statement about vote totals, I&#8217;ll confine my investigatoin to the absolute numbers and the percent of popular votes.<br />
In 2004, Bush did indeed receive 62 million votes, and that number is in fact the &#8216;greatest number of votes of any President.&#8217; This is all the more impressive since the previous election George W. Bush only carried 50 million. He must have been quite popular, especially considering his 2000 result blew Clinton&#8217;s 1996 total of 47 million right out of the water. There appears to be a trend developing here. Let&#8217;s think about this for a moment.<br />
Between 1992 and 2004 every elected president won more votes than his predecessor. Clearly that means that in this timeframe each elected president was mor popular than his predecessor (even if that predecessor was himself). Right?<br />
The percentages seem to tell a different story. Lets first look at the previous record holder, Ronald Regan. In 1984 he carried 54 million votes. Undoubtedly a respectable number, but certainly less than Bush&#8217;s &#8216;04 total of 62 million. But which of these two men was the more popular candidate? Bush beat Kerry by 2.46% of the popular vote in 2004, whereas Reagan beat Mondale by 18.2%. How to explain the descrepancy? Simple: populaiton growth. The CIA world factbook estimates US populaiton growth at .88% annually. This number fluctuates from year to year, but has remained consistently in the positive. If we assume .88% annual growth compunded annually, we will see a population increase of roughly 3.57% over 4 years. This means that every election will have a higher absolute population than the election prior to it. While this does not result in a 1:1 increase in the voting populatoin, we would expect to see some increase in the voting population nonetheless. So it seems rather logical to conclude that the observed trend of absolute numbers of votes for elected presidents increaasing over time is positively correleated to the increase in population over time. Put simply, there are more votes because, in part, there are more people alive that are capable of voting.<br />
In fact, Bush&#8217;s margin of victory in 2004 is decidedly on the low end. In the last 24 years, 6 full election cycles from 2004, only one contest has been decided by a narrower margin: The 2000 election was decided by .51% of the vote&#8230;in favor of Mr. Gore.<br />
I realize that I&#8217;m weeks behind in this post, and it will likely remain unread. However I can&#8217;t abide would-be pundits posting skewed statistics in an attempt to dupe readers into subscribing to their philosophy, especially when said pundit has repeatedly encouraged posters to &#8216;look it up and put it all together&#8217;. As if the rest of us are somehow incapable of comprehending complex political situations. As if only he has the mental fortitude to sift through media bias and find &#8216;the truth&#8217;. And notwithstanding the fact that the bulk of his posts rely on cheap rhetoric and statistics which are, themselves, either skewed or misrepresented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaledonian</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9916</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaledonian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9916</guid>
		<description>&quot;he’s still only 3/5 of a man&quot;

Racist, much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;he’s still only 3/5 of a man&#8221;</p>
<p>Racist, much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: watermoon</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>watermoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>why not s/he/it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why not s/he/it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hana</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>Hana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>Me too.  It&#039;s the same everywhere. All the media is pro-Obama, and anti everyone else, because they don&#039;t want to be labeled as &quot;racist.&quot;  We&#039;re giving the man way too much power.  Personally, I don&#039;t care if the next president is black, white or purple. I&#039;m just hoping for an intelligent one. Which leaves Obama OUT.  He talks ALOT...and says absolutely NOTHING.   Yet has millions who agree with him. WHAT does that say about the intelligence level of our country???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too.  It&#8217;s the same everywhere. All the media is pro-Obama, and anti everyone else, because they don&#8217;t want to be labeled as &#8220;racist.&#8221;  We&#8217;re giving the man way too much power.  Personally, I don&#8217;t care if the next president is black, white or purple. I&#8217;m just hoping for an intelligent one. Which leaves Obama OUT.  He talks ALOT&#8230;and says absolutely NOTHING.   Yet has millions who agree with him. WHAT does that say about the intelligence level of our country???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hana</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>Hana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>Well said, DRH.  Obama is great at reciting memorized speeches that someone wrote for him. BUT....try to get him to answer something off the cuff and he makes Bush sound like a genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, DRH.  Obama is great at reciting memorized speeches that someone wrote for him. BUT&#8230;.try to get him to answer something off the cuff and he makes Bush sound like a genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hana</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>Hana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>Everyone ALWAYS says the president who&#039;s currently in office is the &quot;worst president ever.&quot;  The sitting president is merely the most convienent target for the nation&#039;s anger. As soon as he gets out, w/i 6 months, whoever the NEW president is will become &quot;the worst president EVER!&quot; and they&#039;ll be wishing Bush was still in office. LOL. Just wait. It happens every election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone ALWAYS says the president who&#8217;s currently in office is the &#8220;worst president ever.&#8221;  The sitting president is merely the most convienent target for the nation&#8217;s anger. As soon as he gets out, w/i 6 months, whoever the NEW president is will become &#8220;the worst president EVER!&#8221; and they&#8217;ll be wishing Bush was still in office. LOL. Just wait. It happens every election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillerbunny</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9539</link>
		<dc:creator>fillerbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9539</guid>
		<description>If anything that gets posted by you is EVER truth, I will (briefly) stop referring to you as Mouthpiece... (goes back to waiting for Mouthpiece&#039;s next Limbaugh/Fox instilled Zombie Talking Point)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything that gets posted by you is EVER truth, I will (briefly) stop referring to you as Mouthpiece&#8230; (goes back to waiting for Mouthpiece&#8217;s next Limbaugh/Fox instilled Zombie Talking Point)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9515</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9515</guid>
		<description>Truth hurts, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truth hurts, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herr Kub</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9511</link>
		<dc:creator>Herr Kub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9511</guid>
		<description>Most Americans could not handle pure conservatism and to be honest, pure conservatism in a historical context is unAmerican. It requires a monarchy. 

The kind of true conservatism that I would like to see is a return to the ideals of our country&#039;s founders. Those libertarian and classical liberal ideas that have keep us alive and well for well over 2 centuries. 

It would be nice if we could return to the world before the government bloat of FDR and tried to solve the problems of that generation with more libertarian and Austrian economic models. But alas, I am afraid it is just too late for that. America is a big government nation. Our only hope at this point is to shrink the government down to a moderate level that is controllable and contained. McCain might be the person to do that. I don&#039;t know. All I do know is that Barack will add to government bloat and deficits. It will not be a return to the &quot;fiscal responsibility&quot; of the Clintons. Or the responsible diplomacy of the H.W. Bush years. 

Obama speaks in RFK and LBJ terms, but I am very frightened that we are looking at another Jimmy Carter or Dubya. Nice words and policies from the point of view of their supporters, but in the end... all hat, no cattle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most Americans could not handle pure conservatism and to be honest, pure conservatism in a historical context is unAmerican. It requires a monarchy. </p>
<p>The kind of true conservatism that I would like to see is a return to the ideals of our country&#8217;s founders. Those libertarian and classical liberal ideas that have keep us alive and well for well over 2 centuries. </p>
<p>It would be nice if we could return to the world before the government bloat of FDR and tried to solve the problems of that generation with more libertarian and Austrian economic models. But alas, I am afraid it is just too late for that. America is a big government nation. Our only hope at this point is to shrink the government down to a moderate level that is controllable and contained. McCain might be the person to do that. I don&#8217;t know. All I do know is that Barack will add to government bloat and deficits. It will not be a return to the &#8220;fiscal responsibility&#8221; of the Clintons. Or the responsible diplomacy of the H.W. Bush years. </p>
<p>Obama speaks in RFK and LBJ terms, but I am very frightened that we are looking at another Jimmy Carter or Dubya. Nice words and policies from the point of view of their supporters, but in the end&#8230; all hat, no cattle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9480</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9480</guid>
		<description>Damn it.  Well I suppose it had to happen sometime, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it.  Well I suppose it had to happen sometime, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chatty</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9428</link>
		<dc:creator>Chatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9428</guid>
		<description>Um, the &#039;slamming Obama&quot; LOLz aren&#039;t as funny because so many of them are done by people that don&#039;t check to see if the words all fit, or are just humor challenged...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, the &#8217;slamming Obama&#8221; LOLz aren&#8217;t as funny because so many of them are done by people that don&#8217;t check to see if the words all fit, or are just humor challenged&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillerbunny</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9422</link>
		<dc:creator>fillerbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9422</guid>
		<description>NOOOO!!!!! You just gave away the ultimate secret of Douchenozzlery!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo........................

(And kudos on working in an evil laugh!  BTW- www.drhorrible.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOOOO!!!!! You just gave away the ultimate secret of Douchenozzlery!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>(And kudos on working in an evil laugh!  BTW- <a href="http://www.drhorrible.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.drhorrible.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillerbunny</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9419</link>
		<dc:creator>fillerbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9419</guid>
		<description>And again with the Zombie Talking Point...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And again with the Zombie Talking Point&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillerbunny</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9417</link>
		<dc:creator>fillerbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9417</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called context, Mouthpiece....  And you are definitely not one to talk about brains, apart from the context of the Talking Point Zombie that you are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called context, Mouthpiece&#8230;.  And you are definitely not one to talk about brains, apart from the context of the Talking Point Zombie that you are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fillerbunny</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9416</link>
		<dc:creator>fillerbunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9416</guid>
		<description>and you would be wrong, my dear Jane....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and you would be wrong, my dear Jane&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9414</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9414</guid>
		<description>But even now, more people hate the Democrat controlled congress than hate Bush.

So Seth fails again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But even now, more people hate the Democrat controlled congress than hate Bush.</p>
<p>So Seth fails again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9406</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9406</guid>
		<description>Of course, I meant 2000.
FAIL for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I meant 2000.<br />
FAIL for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9405</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9405</guid>
		<description>The &#039;everybody hates Bush&#039; theory is actually quite valid.

Though he may have received the &#039;greatest number of votes of any President ever,&#039; that doesn&#039;t truly mean much of anything.  Sure, they all liked Bush in 200, but 8 years later, not so much anymore.

Bush = FAIL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;everybody hates Bush&#8217; theory is actually quite valid.</p>
<p>Though he may have received the &#8216;greatest number of votes of any President ever,&#8217; that doesn&#8217;t truly mean much of anything.  Sure, they all liked Bush in 200, but 8 years later, not so much anymore.</p>
<p>Bush = FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9400</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9400</guid>
		<description>You have to make allowances for fillerbunny. She&#039;s not very smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to make allowances for fillerbunny. She&#8217;s not very smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9398</guid>
		<description>Ahh, good plan...  We should strive to offend people only with our political viewpoints.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, good plan&#8230;  We should strive to offend people only with our political viewpoints.  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinson</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9395</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9395</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just going to start using &quot;(s)he&quot; on this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just going to start using &#8220;(s)he&#8221; on this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9394</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9394</guid>
		<description>I could be wrong, but I think fillerbunny is a girl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could be wrong, but I think fillerbunny is a girl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincinatus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>cincinatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9393</guid>
		<description>ummm.... not really.  The choice of front page pictures is **related to**, but doesn&#039;t follow, the voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummm&#8230;. not really.  The choice of front page pictures is **related to**, but doesn&#8217;t follow, the voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincinatus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator>cincinatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9392</guid>
		<description>Um... Ema didn&#039;t say anything about &quot;President Obama&quot;; Ema merely stated that Obama would lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; Ema didn&#8217;t say anything about &#8220;President Obama&#8221;; Ema merely stated that Obama would lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinson</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9384</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9384</guid>
		<description>Oh, well I don&#039;t think he achieved that textbook sarcasm he was speaking of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, well I don&#8217;t think he achieved that textbook sarcasm he was speaking of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9380</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9380</guid>
		<description>Well treekid, it&#039;s very complicated.  You see Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and other top democrats see Barack Obama as their greatest hope for having a democrat in the White House, thus securing their party&#039;s power in the executive as well as the legislative branch of government.  This is very important to them and so they had to devise a very clever plan that would help them win the election in November.  This plan includes taking over popular internet site &quot;icanhazcheezeburger&quot; and it&#039;s sister sites, including the one we&#039;re on, &quot;punditkitchen&quot;.  By supressing anti-Obama lols and churning out poor quality anti-McCain lols the site administration (controlled by the democratic party of course) have launched a complicated mind control plan that will force Americans to vote for Obama out of a fear of being seen as &quot;racist&quot; if they don&#039;t.  It is a brilliant plan and the best part is, by claiming the site works on a &quot;voting&quot; system, the site administrators (and through them the democratic party) will succeed with their evil plot and no one will ever be the wiser.   

*cue evil laugh*

MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well treekid, it&#8217;s very complicated.  You see Howard Dean, Nancy Pelosi, and other top democrats see Barack Obama as their greatest hope for having a democrat in the White House, thus securing their party&#8217;s power in the executive as well as the legislative branch of government.  This is very important to them and so they had to devise a very clever plan that would help them win the election in November.  This plan includes taking over popular internet site &#8220;icanhazcheezeburger&#8221; and it&#8217;s sister sites, including the one we&#8217;re on, &#8220;punditkitchen&#8221;.  By supressing anti-Obama lols and churning out poor quality anti-McCain lols the site administration (controlled by the democratic party of course) have launched a complicated mind control plan that will force Americans to vote for Obama out of a fear of being seen as &#8220;racist&#8221; if they don&#8217;t.  It is a brilliant plan and the best part is, by claiming the site works on a &#8220;voting&#8221; system, the site administrators (and through them the democratic party) will succeed with their evil plot and no one will ever be the wiser.   </p>
<p>*cue evil laugh*</p>
<p>MUWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9379</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9379</guid>
		<description>Actually, I don&#039;t think fillerbunny made up either &quot;crotchwaffle&quot; or &quot;douchenozzle&quot;.  &quot;Crotchwaffle&quot; was first introduced to us on the Rainbow Bright Death Squad thread by someone else and was quickly taken up by anyone wishing to point out an utter lack of anything resembling a working human brain.  &quot;Douchenozzle&quot; is a bit more recent and not as widespread.  Sadly I can not pinpoint exactly which thread it originated from.  As to what fillerbunny was trying to say, dear friend, was an attempt at humor directed at ALL of us posters who get self-righteous to the point of ridiculous in the midst of our debates sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think fillerbunny made up either &#8220;crotchwaffle&#8221; or &#8220;douchenozzle&#8221;.  &#8220;Crotchwaffle&#8221; was first introduced to us on the Rainbow Bright Death Squad thread by someone else and was quickly taken up by anyone wishing to point out an utter lack of anything resembling a working human brain.  &#8220;Douchenozzle&#8221; is a bit more recent and not as widespread.  Sadly I can not pinpoint exactly which thread it originated from.  As to what fillerbunny was trying to say, dear friend, was an attempt at humor directed at ALL of us posters who get self-righteous to the point of ridiculous in the midst of our debates sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinson</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9367</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9367</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about McCain being the real conservative change.  Differrent than Bush, yes.  Better than Obama? Oh, god, yes.  The republican party has swung too far left.  I wish it would get back to real conservatism, as do many others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about McCain being the real conservative change.  Differrent than Bush, yes.  Better than Obama? Oh, god, yes.  The republican party has swung too far left.  I wish it would get back to real conservatism, as do many others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That guy ---&#62; over there</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9365</link>
		<dc:creator>That guy ---&#62; over there</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9365</guid>
		<description>He tried to handle that many people?! O.o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He tried to handle that many people?! O.o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Pundit</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9353</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9353</guid>
		<description>Except Bush beat Kerry, receiving the greatest number of votes of any President, ever.

Therefore your &#039;everyone hates Bush&#039; theory fails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except Bush beat Kerry, receiving the greatest number of votes of any President, ever.</p>
<p>Therefore your &#8216;everyone hates Bush&#8217; theory fails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincinatus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9333</link>
		<dc:creator>cincinatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9333</guid>
		<description>Yeppers.  What is the point of a &quot;recount&quot; where at least one of the &quot;recounted&quot; images is STILL ON THE HOME PAGE at the time that the &quot;recount&quot; is posted?

Massive feature FAIL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeppers.  What is the point of a &#8220;recount&#8221; where at least one of the &#8220;recounted&#8221; images is STILL ON THE HOME PAGE at the time that the &#8220;recount&#8221; is posted?</p>
<p>Massive feature FAIL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincinatus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link>
		<dc:creator>cincinatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9331</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s trying to say that she&#039;s angry and like to make up &quot;clever&quot; words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s trying to say that she&#8217;s angry and like to make up &#8220;clever&#8221; words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cincinatus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>cincinatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>Oh, I hear ya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I hear ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GomerPhyls</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9317</link>
		<dc:creator>GomerPhyls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9317</guid>
		<description>If you could please direct your attention to directly above the pictures, you&#039;ll realize that those 2 pictures are &quot;The Most Voted&quot; and &quot;The Most Commented&quot; pictures of the last week. If you&#039;d like to then verify that fact you can look through the last week worth of photos and you&#039;ll quickly realize how much suck and fail your comment is full of. Pundit Kitchen&#039;s front page material is selected through a democratic process. Republican conservatives are a minority on Pundit Kitchen, therefore,  Bush bashing will continue until the Douchenozzles grow tired of it (which isn&#039;t likely to be anytime soon). Get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you could please direct your attention to directly above the pictures, you&#8217;ll realize that those 2 pictures are &#8220;The Most Voted&#8221; and &#8220;The Most Commented&#8221; pictures of the last week. If you&#8217;d like to then verify that fact you can look through the last week worth of photos and you&#8217;ll quickly realize how much suck and fail your comment is full of. Pundit Kitchen&#8217;s front page material is selected through a democratic process. Republican conservatives are a minority on Pundit Kitchen, therefore,  Bush bashing will continue until the Douchenozzles grow tired of it (which isn&#8217;t likely to be anytime soon). Get used to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9298</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9298</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with you on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with you on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lolnathan</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9293</link>
		<dc:creator>Lolnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9293</guid>
		<description>Clearly, making fun of Obama is racist because he is biracial. Making fun of a rich white guy is not. 

You&#039;ll notice none of the Obama lolz really say anything bad about the guy, and aren&#039;t really funny. But don&#039;t worry, once he is President Obama he&#039;ll start screwing up and we&#039;ll get to make lolz about him. Maybee.

I suspect Obama will have a great approval rating because disapproving would be racist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, making fun of Obama is racist because he is biracial. Making fun of a rich white guy is not. </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice none of the Obama lolz really say anything bad about the guy, and aren&#8217;t really funny. But don&#8217;t worry, once he is President Obama he&#8217;ll start screwing up and we&#8217;ll get to make lolz about him. Maybee.</p>
<p>I suspect Obama will have a great approval rating because disapproving would be racist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9265</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9265</guid>
		<description>Well, it is true that he opens himself up to it. It is also true that a lot of people are uncomfortable making fun of Obama for obvious reasons. It is also true that there is much more history with Bush that we have to draw from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it is true that he opens himself up to it. It is also true that a lot of people are uncomfortable making fun of Obama for obvious reasons. It is also true that there is much more history with Bush that we have to draw from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9263</link>
		<dc:creator>Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9263</guid>
		<description>Figures that the two &quot;best&quot; photos are the Bush bashing ones.

Left-wing political agenda win?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Figures that the two &#8220;best&#8221; photos are the Bush bashing ones.</p>
<p>Left-wing political agenda win?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bus</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9261</link>
		<dc:creator>Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9261</guid>
		<description>Zing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TritonBoat</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9235</link>
		<dc:creator>TritonBoat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9235</guid>
		<description>You wouldnt stand a chance.  My Obama only asking for 3/5 of your vote would be the winner since he&#039;s still only 3/5 of a man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wouldnt stand a chance.  My Obama only asking for 3/5 of your vote would be the winner since he&#8217;s still only 3/5 of a man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flingdecow</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9230</link>
		<dc:creator>flingdecow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9230</guid>
		<description>I like the recount. New feature win!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the recount. New feature win!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danyell</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9229</link>
		<dc:creator>Danyell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9229</guid>
		<description>Maybe if he didn&#039;t have such a stupid face and lousy track record it wouldn&#039;t be so easy!



Though, that banana thing still would have been funny if it were someone else making the exact same face as far as I&#039;m concerned...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe if he didn&#8217;t have such a stupid face and lousy track record it wouldn&#8217;t be so easy!</p>
<p>Though, that banana thing still would have been funny if it were someone else making the exact same face as far as I&#8217;m concerned&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinson</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9223</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9223</guid>
		<description>I chuckle at his teleprompted speeches, too.  Then I feel bad, because, he just might be president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chuckle at his teleprompted speeches, too.  Then I feel bad, because, he just might be president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kinson</title>
		<link>http://punditkitchen.com/2008/07/14/political-pictures-weekly-recount-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9221</link>
		<dc:creator>Kinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punditkitchen.wordpress.com/?p=2440#comment-9221</guid>
		<description>FDR is praised and he royally messed things up in ways that are still seen today.  Just one example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDR is praised and he royally messed things up in ways that are still seen today.  Just one example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
